@gusmopi Esse assunto é mto interessante, eu gosto mto desse vídeo do Tom Scott sobre https://t.co/Ef0cKeJASs
Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers' conceptions of time.
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
Feb 2019 – Jul 2025Where it's discussed
-
X / Twitter76 posts
-
Blogs5 articles
-
Bluesky4 posts
-
News4 articles
-
YouTube2 videos
-
Facebook2 posts
AI synopsis
What people are saying
Participants demonstrate interest by referencing Tom Scott's videos on linguistic relativity and the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, with words like 'interesting' and mentions of debates and studies. The tone varies from curiosity to skepticism, with some posts expressing disagreement or critique, which reflects a nuanced but not deeply transformative impact on their views.
Many comments acknowledge the debate but do not strongly agree or disagree, reflecting mixed opinions or skepticism regarding the influence of language on thought.
Discussion participants show high curiosity, referencing various videos, theories, and examples about language and cognition, indicating engaging curiosity.
Some users briefly mention the topic or share links, suggesting moderate engagement but not deep analysis, although a few critique the video's claims, showing some critical thinking.
The discussions introduce the idea of language's influence on thought, but many dismiss or question it, signifying a modest impact on established beliefs or scientific consensus.
Abstract in brief
- The experiments show that different languages influence how people think about time, with English speakers viewing it as horizontal and Mandarin speakers as vertical.
- Bilinguals’ perception of time being vertical is linked to when they first learned English, indicating language exposure affects thought patterns.
- When English speakers were taught to describe time vertically like Mandarin speakers, they began to think about time in a similar way, suggesting language shapes habitual thought but doesn’t completely determine it.
Top posts
Most liked on X and BlueskyIt's a new Tom Scott Language Files video, co-written with me and Molly Ruhl, and this time debunking the ever-popular Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis! https://t.co/jrKF3abpvI
Does the language you speak change how you think? No. Mostly. https://t.co/u3zLkDd7g2
Genelde George Orwell'in 1984'ündeki Newspeak kavramıyla bilinen Sapir-Whorf hipotezinin (Dilsel Görecelik: Dil insan düşüncesini şekillendirir) yanılgısını açıklayan videoya denk geldim. Az, öz, 5 dakikada işin aslı açıklanıyor: https://t.co/cyCMsvPNpY
tom scott baru upload video baru yg isinya krg lebih kyk omongan gw. bahkan contohnya (yg terkait orwell) jg sama https://t.co/2TkAVicr4j https://t.co/u4ha9oM1lq
https://t.co/wPetCCOY4c Granted I don't watch a lot of his videos, but... is this the first time I've ever outright disagreed with Tom Scott? He uses weak examples to try to justify a strong conclusion I wonder if he speaks a native level second language
All mentions
Language Influences Perception of Time in English and Mandarin Speakers
The experiments show that different languages influence how people think about time, with English speakers viewing it as horizontal and Mandarin speakers as vertical.
Language and Thought: Exploring the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis and Brain Perception
This video discusses the influence of language on thought, focusing on the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis and recent cognitive research suggesting language can shape perception and thinking styles, especially in areas like…
Influence of Language and Culture on Spatial Perception of Time
An introduction to the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, examining how language and culture shape the spatial representation of time, influenced by reading and writing directions, affecting cognitive processes across cultures.
youtu.be/CmZdGo6b5yA?... I have lots of points to make about this post (not hating, but as a toki pona speaker I do have lots of criticisms about the points your making) but to start I’m just going to leave this here for now
RT @afterstrm: @gusmopi Esse assunto é mto interessante, eu gosto mto desse vídeo do Tom Scott sobre https://t.co/Ef0cKeJASs
RT @afterstrm: @gusmopi Esse assunto é mto interessante, eu gosto mto desse vídeo do Tom Scott sobre https://t.co/Ef0cKeJASs
RT @afterstrm: @gusmopi Esse assunto é mto interessante, eu gosto mto desse vídeo do Tom Scott sobre https://t.co/Ef0cKeJASs
RT @afterstrm: @gusmopi Esse assunto é mto interessante, eu gosto mto desse vídeo do Tom Scott sobre https://t.co/Ef0cKeJASs
RT @afterstrm: @gusmopi Esse assunto é mto interessante, eu gosto mto desse vídeo do Tom Scott sobre https://t.co/Ef0cKeJASs
RT @afterstrm: @gusmopi Esse assunto é mto interessante, eu gosto mto desse vídeo do Tom Scott sobre https://t.co/Ef0cKeJASs
@70spulp https://t.co/tpdzxDk3lj
RT @afterstrm: @gusmopi Esse assunto é mto interessante, eu gosto mto desse vídeo do Tom Scott sobre https://t.co/Ef0cKeJASs
RT @afterstrm: @gusmopi Esse assunto é mto interessante, eu gosto mto desse vídeo do Tom Scott sobre https://t.co/Ef0cKeJASs
RT @afterstrm: @gusmopi Esse assunto é mto interessante, eu gosto mto desse vídeo do Tom Scott sobre https://t.co/Ef0cKeJASs
@gusmopi Esse assunto é mto interessante, eu gosto mto desse vídeo do Tom Scott sobre https://t.co/Ef0cKeJASs
@filmbitten https://t.co/EVxygF1ECG
@adityarao310 There’s a lot of debate on Sapir Whorf though. Tom Scott has a nice video on the topic. The idea of Sapir Whorf sounds so cool though. I learned about it first from Arrival (the movie) - the movie literally centers around this idea. https://t.co/LBOKnqGKh2
@Nenia_da more like next tom scott (https://t.co/Lb9N7ezngO)
@WillyMacShow @AlexJayBrady @itsdeaann https://t.co/a3lph1y4VX
@lingosteve - Fun little video - https://t.co/hWAT1PU0nQ
@elonmusk https://t.co/koqSQyqVco @tomscott
過大評価されすぎたフィクションの似非科学を金科玉条のごとく崇拝するのをやめてください…アイアンマン! https://t.co/BeuUl6Vvh5 https://t.co/9sOqA312Ph
There is an argument that the language one speaks influences their thinking and subconsciously plants narratives, however I personally don't believe in this, as it has been disproven countless times. Here's a video by Tom Scott on this topic, for example: https://t.co/IFrhesl9tI
@moviemenfes https://t.co/yMi5AmTkBi
abri o youtube depois de ver o filme e esse video me aparece, ai ai esse algoritmo https://t.co/tn8puQXoZt https://t.co/TkUAl06hYs
RT @GretchenAMcC: It's a new Tom Scott Language Files video, co-written with me and Molly Ruhl, and this time debunking the ever-popular Sa…
RT @GretchenAMcC: It's a new Tom Scott Language Files video, co-written with me and Molly Ruhl, and this time debunking the ever-popular Sa…
It's a new Tom Scott Language Files video, co-written with me and Molly Ruhl, and this time debunking the ever-popular Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CmZdGo6b5yA&list=PL96C35uN7xGLDEnHuhD7CTZES3KXFnwm0&index=1&ab_channel=TomScott
It's a new Tom Scott Language Files video, co-written with me and Molly Ruhl, and this time debunking the ever-popular Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis! https://t.co/jrKF3abpvI
@pseudonymtra Tom Scott has an excellent video on this. https://t.co/9AVscfgYKh
Does the language you speak change how you think? https://t.co/N9bLBDysqd via @YouTube
https://t.co/PbQU0ONWuP https://t.co/ODQdwgNukq
@DoraOzsoy @tameryesildag Tom Scott’un dil ve düşünme arasındaki bağlantıyı sorgulayan yeni bir videosu vardı öneririm: https://t.co/oDUeh0isX3
@thatshirleylee Also more ammunition to disagree with Tom Scott https://t.co/3lKZw8X5Va
RT @_Do0p: @TheHatMadder https://t.co/DDTaeypCFx
@TheHatMadder https://t.co/DDTaeypCFx
@BowTiedPassport It’s a fun theory but most linguists disagree https://t.co/SCDA7dybv5
@techhsiren https://t.co/OCvlysAWsX
https://t.co/PH1v0zT4yH
@CartonCalderon Ignorance is not bound to language, but it is in fact a that many information is made or translated to English, in the scientific community is easier to release a document and to make it reachable. The video talks about another theory about language. https://t.co/Wn5lKztTcR
@TouristInSpace Du menar väl att västvärldens alfabet gett upphov till västvärldens linjära tankesätt? Har du några tankar om hur det fungerar i förhållande till Tom Scotts sammanställning att språk inte ändrar hur vi tänker? https://t.co/uHsLMQDlUU
อาจพิสูจน์กันแล้วว่าภาษาไม่มีผลกับความคิดคน แต่พอเรียนหลาย ๆ ภาษาตั้งแต่เด็ก ก็จะพยายามคิดตามกฎที่มีแล้วพัฒนากระบวนการคิดจากตรงนั้น แต่ต่อให้ไม่มีคำบรรยายมันก็ถูกสร้างขึ้นมาอยู่ดี Does the language you speak changes how you think? By Tom Scott on Youtube https://t.co/2sxJcqQHyc
https://t.co/RfHJF6fV39
@vaikomkaaran No. Probably https://t.co/J9GQY5nEMI
I've met so many people whose world view hinges on this https://t.co/6HarsgdK7N
aLi AkO KoRiStiMo rOdNo RavNoPrAvNi JeZiK, oNdA ćeMo LaKšE pRiHvAtATi ŽeNe u DoMiNaNtNo MušKiM zANiMaNjiMa, i NeĆe BiTi DiSkRiMiNaCiJe i PoDeLe Na MuŠkA iŽeNsKa ZaNiMaNjA (Koga jebe što je nauka odavno rekla da to nema veze s vezom) https://t.co/MfAqSUKfqn
I’m usually a fan of Tom Scott, but here he misses the point. Speaking different languages feels quite different. A study on languages won’t encapsulate the experience of multilingualism. And a comment from a monolingual won’t convince me otherwise. https://t.co/tHIVKdRuGA
Does the language you speak change how you think? No.* but Yes. https://t.co/ppukk0hFZp YouTubeより
tom scott baru upload video baru yg isinya krg lebih kyk omongan gw. bahkan contohnya (yg terkait orwell) jg sama https://t.co/2TkAVicr4j https://t.co/u4ha9oM1lq
Does the language you speak change how you think? No. Mostly. https://t.co/u3zLkDd7g2
https://t.co/wPetCCOY4c Granted I don't watch a lot of his videos, but... is this the first time I've ever outright disagreed with Tom Scott? He uses weak examples to try to justify a strong conclusion I wonder if he speaks a native level second language
Missing the notion of words being created precisely for the purpose of changing thought, as happens in most disciplines, the obvious example being math. Does the language you speak change how you think? https://t.co/vozZ6E7Uru
Does language change the way you think? Turns out no. https://t.co/CC5Vs5bcLS
RT @silentKrokodil: Me recordó las "teorías" sobre el lenguaje inclusivo @rod_villa1000 @danieloso https://t.co/VnbD72DgeM
사용하는 언어를 규제한다고 해서 느끼는 감정과 생각까지 규제되지는 않는다. 언어가 우리의 생각을 담는 틀이지만 생각은 언어에 제한받지 않는다 https://t.co/GyBnI90Dmo
Liked on YouTube: Does the language you speak change how you think? https://t.co/cnSZjHpd6t
Does the language you speak change how you think? https://t.co/cmaYvaptUh via @YouTube
The video conflates the idea by, ironically, being limited to English conceptualisation via language. The Orwellian concept is "think", not "feel". Those in 1984 can *feel* those feelings, but cannot *think* them, without language. https://t.co/WiThVGVxAa
Me recordó las "teorías" sobre el lenguaje inclusivo @rod_villa1000 @danieloso https://t.co/VnbD72DgeM
O como el lenguaje igualitario es una estafa ideologica. -La conclusion es solo mia. https://t.co/G6sHzmrkBv
Does the language you speak change how you think? https://t.co/Fd7wJ2Bym2
https://t.co/prIR7eADTe https://t.co/v56RkEekx2
RT @LXZE: Does the language you speak change how you think? https://t.co/RMWUyNLcaI
Does the language you speak change how you think? https://t.co/RMWUyNLcaI
Does the language you speak change how you think? https://t.co/7BZcAFFh4q via @YouTube
Oh boy he's done it. This might be the most controversial linguistics thing ever. youtu.be/CmZdGo6b5yA?...
I love Tom Scott "Does the language you speak change how you think?" สรุปที่พูดกันว่าภาษาสามารถ influence ความคิดเราได้นั้นจริงไหม? ถึงตอนนี้ยังไม่มีหลักฐาน support สมมติฐานนี้ได้ Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis ที่มีพูดในหนัง Arrival นี่ก็ไม่ได้รับการยอมรับ https://t.co/jdApPFPvGj https://t.co/KnXAD4XPLQ
youtu.be/CmZdGo6b5yA?...
@ScottAdamsSays https://t.co/4jZpPHVxnh
Another great language file by @tomscott and colleagues: https://t.co/FS8NIpSCWp
Genelde George Orwell'in 1984'ündeki Newspeak kavramıyla bilinen Sapir-Whorf hipotezinin (Dilsel Görecelik: Dil insan düşüncesini şekillendirir) yanılgısını açıklayan videoya denk geldim. Az, öz, 5 dakikada işin aslı açıklanıyor: https://t.co/cyCMsvPNpY
Great short video by the inestimable @tomscottabout linguistic determinism and how it doesn’t exist. https://t.co/yLyjyVjuos
Does the language you speak change how you think? https://t.co/gdE1iIzuIS via @YouTube
Does the language you speak change how you think? https://t.co/nhPoXwkec0 via @YouTube
@philosophytweet Conveniently, this video has now appeared. https://t.co/omQAkHQMhk
https://t.co/Xpc9vrFKFo
Droga https://t.co/FAve4stIgE https://t.co/zQ0eQyEWPT
This is why latinx is stupid and considered a slur https://t.co/623W3qcVDS
Make sure you checkout @tomscott's latest video where he explains how the language you speak might change how you think?
As Animals,Do Humans Have Visual Thoughts Or Sound Thoughts Or Vocalizing Thoughts Or Tasty Thoughts Or Smelly Thoughts Or Touchy Thoughts Or ONLY LANGUAGE THOUGHTS SUPERSEDING ALL OTHER THOUGHTS MEANING ABSENCE OF LANGUAGE KEEPS ANIMALS SANER THAN HUMANS? https://t.co/chEUSskTj3
@Hebezguo @SangBina @leraboroditsky The study "Does Language Shape Thought?: Mandarin and English Speakers' Conceptions of Time" conducted by Lera Boroditsky, the lecturer in this TED talk, discuss the way different language speakers describe time. The use of "上"(up) and "下"(down) is especially intersting.
@odony @jburnmurdoch Languages and cultures do seem to differ in their spatial conceptualisations of time, in Chinese for example, up/down seems to be more frequent than forward/backwards for talking about time https://t.co/0Set4EFAoB
@hautepop @zunguzungu There has been more recent research that rekindled the debate. Lera Boroditsky “Does Language Shape Thought?: Mandarin and English Speakers' Conceptions of Time” https://t.co/iQ7lC2emAc
DG
V
MP
TA