Correlation between (equipped) bench press 1RM and fat-free mass in 20 elite male powerlifters. R = 0.88 https://t.co/1CTS20dkVi https://t.co/AlKHpPuJcz
The role of FFM accumulation and skeletal muscle architecture in powerlifting performance.
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
Nov 2020 – Sep 2023Where it's discussed
-
X / Twitter2 posts
-
YouTube2 videos
AI synopsis
What people are saying
Overall, the discussions reflect a strong alignment with the article's findings, with comments like 'most good trainers/trainees do this' indicating recognition of the importance of muscle development, and references to specific data such as the high correlation (R=0.88) underscore interest in the scientific evidence. The tone and word choices illustrate a focus on practical application and the potential for improving powerlifting performance based on muscle architecture insights.
Most discussions acknowledge the importance of muscle morphology and FFM in powerlifting, as seen in comments emphasizing the correlation between muscle size and strength.
The posts show high curiosity about the research findings, particularly the significant correlation coefficients and practical implications for training.
Some discussions delve into training methods and the significance of muscle architecture, reflecting a moderate level of active engagement with the content.
The highlighted statistical correlations and emphasis on muscle properties suggest that the publication could influence training approaches and future research directions.
Abstract in brief
- This study examined how skeletal muscle size and architecture relate to powerlifting performance in elite athletes, highlighting the importance of muscle distribution and thickness at specific sites like the subscapular muscle.
- It found strong correlations between muscle size, fat-free mass (FFM), and lifting success, suggesting that greater muscle thickness, especially in the subscapular area, predicts better performance across lifts.
- Additionally, muscle architectural features such as fascicle length and pennation angle showed significant links to FFM and performance, with longer fascicles and certain angles indicating higher capacity, though pennation angle alone was negatively related to overall performance.
Top posts
Most liked on X and Bluesky@CoachFHM Most good trainers/trainees do this: but many who get caught up with just the main lifts for low reps think that any work beyond that is pointless. 60-75% of strength comes from cross sectional area of muscle. https://t.co/NwFYiXvP5N
All mentions
Key Fundamentals for Maximizing Muscle Growth and Strength
This umbrella review analyzed multiple systematic reviews to understand how resistance training variables affect muscle mass, strength, and physical function in healthy adults, emphasizing the importance of resistance…
Impact of Skeletal Muscle Architecture on Powerlifting Performance
This study examines how skeletal muscle size and architecture relate to powerlifting success, highlighting muscle distribution and thickness, especially in the subscapular area, as predictors of performance.
@CoachFHM Most good trainers/trainees do this: but many who get caught up with just the main lifts for low reps think that any work beyond that is pointless. 60-75% of strength comes from cross sectional area of muscle. https://t.co/NwFYiXvP5N
Correlation between (equipped) bench press 1RM and fat-free mass in 20 elite male powerlifters. R = 0.88 https://t.co/1CTS20dkVi https://t.co/AlKHpPuJcz
DS
HP