November 2003 PMID 14599253

A multidimensional structure for repetitive thought: what's on your mind, and how, and how much?

Suzanne C Segerstrom, Annette L Stanton, Lynn E Alden, Brenna E Shortridge

Download social card

Mentions

Peak: 9 in Aug 2025

across 3 sources since Nov 2021

Extended reach

2,490

potential audience

Total likes

Video views

2,021

Mentions per month

Nov 2021 – Aug 2025

Where it's discussed

YouTube9 videos
Blogs2 articles
X / Twitter1 posts

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The comments indicate overall agreement and interest, often describing the study as 'interessante' and discussing its relevance to understanding repetitive thoughts, with some participants reflecting on how these insights might influence wellbeing; the tone remains positive but not deeply analytical or critical.

AgreementModerate agreement

Most discussions agree that the study provides valuable insights into the structure of repetitive thoughts, as evidenced by positive language like 'interessante' and alignment with the research's focus.

InterestHigh interest

The discussions display a high level of curiosity and interest in understanding the concepts, with mentions of the 'struttura multidimensionale' and appreciation of its relevance.

EngagementModerate engagement

Participants engage by sharing opinions on the significance of these thought patterns, though the engagement remains somewhat surface-level, mostly consisting of acknowledgment and brief reactions.

ImpactModerate impact

While the discussion recognizes the importance of the research, it seems to have a modest influence on broader perspectives or practical applications yet, suggesting a cautious recognition of its potential impact.

Abstract in brief

The research explores a complex, multi-dimensional structure of repetitive thoughts (RT), focusing on their content valence (positive or negative) and purpose (searching or solving), and how these dimensions influence wellbeing.
Study 1 used multidimensional scaling to identify these two core dimensions among students, while Study 2 found that RT descriptions also included additional aspects like arousal and polarization, relating to the emotional tone and intensity of thoughts.
In Study 3, the valence and purpose of RT, particularly in women facing breast cancer prevention, were linked to their current affect and overall psychological and physical health, highlighting the importance of these thought patterns for wellbeing.]

Read the full abstract