Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
Many discussions refer to the article’s emphasis on how cohesion influences performance through specific components like behavior and efficiency, exemplified by phrases such as 'clarifies the relationship' and 'important for organizations.' The tone combines analytical commentary with moderate enthusiasm, reflecting an interest in applying these insights while acknowledging the research’s contributions.
Most discussions show support, highlighting how the findings clarify the link between cohesion and performance, especially in relation to behavior and efficiency.
Postings indicate a moderate level of curiosity, with some commentary on the nuances of the research but lacking deep technical engagement.
The discussions include references to implications and methodological details, suggesting a moderate level of participant involvement.
Opinions suggest that the article could influence future organizational practices and research directions, though the overall sentiment remains cautious.
Beal D. J., Cohen R. R., Burke M. J., McLendon C. L. (2003). Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 989-1004.
This episode explores the importance of team cohesion, emphasizing mutual interaction over mere team adhesion. It covers the three pillars of building a unified team and the patterns that undermine it, highlighting…
This episode explores team cohesion using a chemistry analogy, emphasizing shared purpose, culture, and mutual interaction as key to high performance in fields like medicine and military. Discover the science behind…
Beal D. J., Cohen R. R., Burke M. J., McLendon C. L. (2003). Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 989-1004.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.989. §Beus, J. M., Payne, S. C., Bergman, M. E., & Arthur, W., Jr. (2010). Safety climate and injuries: An examination ...
doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.989. Beersma, B., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2003). The aftermath of group negotiation: How social motives affect distal group ...
... 10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.989 search on the role of task and outcome interdependence as Beersma, B., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (1999). Negotiation processes and
doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.989. Beauchamp, M.R. (2005). Towards an applied model of role perceptions and group dynamics in sport: From theory and research to ...
doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.989. PMID 14640811. S2CID 1342307. 4. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Carron, A.V.; Brawley, L.R. (2000). "Cohesion: Conceptual and ...
doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.989.989. Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York, NY: Harper & Row. Campbell, J. P., Dunnette, M. D., & Hough, L. M. (Eds ...
meta-analytic clarification of construct relations”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 88 No. 6, pp. 989-1004, doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.989. Bettenhausen, K ...
https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.989. Zaccaro, S. J., Rittman, A. L., & Marks, M. A. (2001). Team leadership. The Leadership Quarterly ...
s://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.989). PMID 14640811 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14640811). 98. O'leary-kelly, Anne ...
A