org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa032867. Justin Granath ·
They ALSO knew SARS was airborne since at least 2004. If SARS1 was airborne, why did it take YEARS to admit the same was true of SARS2? Follow the
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
This collection of social discussions exhibits a strong consensus that SARS, especially SARS-CoV-1, was proven airborne as early as 2004, supported by references to studies like Yu et al. (2004). The tone is urgent and reproachful, criticizing authorities for ignoring or denying this evidence during the COVID-19 pandemic, which they argue has led to unnecessary death and suffering. Words like 'malfeasance,' 'negligence,' and phrases such as 'they knew' underscore the deep frustration and demand for accountability, reflecting a high level of engagement and recognition of the implications for public health impact.
Most discussions strongly affirm that SARS has been proven airborne since 2004 and highlight the failure of authorities to act on this knowledge during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Participants demonstrate high engagement, referencing specific studies, historical outbreaks, and calling for accountability, showing active and invested interest.
Many posts delve deeply into epidemiological details, historical data, and scientific studies, indicating a significant level of thoughtful involvement.
The discussions emphasize the critical importance of acknowledging airborne transmission to prevent future disasters, highlighting the high impact of forcing official acknowledgment and restructuring responses.
They ALSO knew SARS was airborne since at least 2004. If SARS1 was airborne, why did it take YEARS to admit the same was true of SARS2? Follow the
“Nobody knew in March 2020 that SARS-COV-2 was airborne!” We knew from SARS-COV-1 in 2004. And so did WHO’s Tedros. Then his boss told him to refer to “airborne” as a “military term.” https://t.co/HBOxaBBPQh
@mvankerkhove SARS1. Airborne transmission demonstrated in 2004. https://t.co/XJGEDcG1m7 https://t.co/115YySvpXc
@DaniBeckman Can I assist you with some studies? Because they didn't know what happens in the brain, they thought people had mental health problems. 2004: They knew SARS is airborne https://t.co/OpGyOBBcvp 2005: https://t.co/VHqGqa21kX 2009: Long-term psychiatric morbidities among SARS
@TaylorLorenz Mind you, this qualified sociologist could not be bothered to check if SARS-COV-1 was documented as airborne. Back in 2004. https://t.co/HBOxaBBPQh
The disparity was there from day 1 and many of us noticed they were cherry picking the science. So I started to do my own research into the first SARS outbreak. This had been described as airborne and they defeated it with good public health advice and masking. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15102999/
This video details the coronavirus incubation period, confirmed cases, deaths, and recoveries. Dr. Seheult discusses virus spread mechanisms, including potential fecal-oral transmission, and recommended prevention…
The study analyzed how SARS spreads within buildings, highlighting the role of airborne transmission via aerosols. Using airflow models, it showed virus-laden aerosols dispersing through airshafts, with higher infection…
www.denver7.com/news/local-n...
PRA CURTIR A SEXTA ATÉ O SOL NASCER Whisky Escocês Blended 10 Anos Ballantine's
it’s nice to be powered by love for steve + metalheads once more + unencumbered by the requirements of production, studio whims, and general dummies
Did a follow
I saw promo videos on the news last night. It seems the waitresses all wear those funky helmets. Still, it was very reckless to be using those sparklers in a building that’s got a LOT of wood in it.
#aknk_FA 鳥さんのお名前教えて下さい
불경기도 문제고... (아이러니하게도)민주화도 문제고... 그냥 여러가지 것들...
The Vision of the Prophet Ezekiel https://www.wikiart.org/en/mikhail-vrubel/the-vision-of-the-prophet-ezekiel-1906
index KAWADAダウンドロストミドルコート【撥水/洗濯機OK/2WAY/静電気防止裏地】《XS~3L》 インデックス ジャケット・アウター ダウンジャケット・ダウンベスト グレー ブラック 19,800円 https://ift.tt/1KQelFL ad
RIGHT?!
微笑ましいォョ好き☺️
The festive season is beautiful, but it can leave the body tired
Vaya tela
Well done!!
GM MJ
나 서브웨이 라즈베리치즈케이크쿠키좋아
Sympa! FAUSSE COMMUNE J'ai localisé correctement 9 régions sur 11 !
They be going at each other so hard in the game and the chat is unhinged.
open.substack.com/pub/heatherc...
之 永遠 好 RP
The cats are out of the binbag!
正月早々FF14の野良PT(高難易度枠ではない)でギミック処理ミスりまくってヘコむなどした(2マス戻って1回休み) シナリオ進行上必須の通常コンテンツ枠でも難易度についていけなくなってきたし、 復帰こそしてみたけど記憶力低下中のアクション苦手人間には合わないのかなあと思うなどした ソロゲーに戻るか……
A vote for Farage is a vote for self harm. Trump and Farage are politicians for the rich - dangerous for poorer people.
Earthwise SN74016 40-Volt Cordless Electric Snow Shovel, Brushless Motor, 16-Inch width, 300lbs/Minute (Battery and Charger Included) #16inch #snowthrower #snowblower #300lbs
씻고 흑백요리사 한 편 보고 그러고 자자!! 라자라자 화이팅! \^0^/
탐랩은 없고 겁나 어수선한 과정샷만 있는 그림
- What is common sense to one, is not always so common to another.
kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk 13 kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
>entire motivation is fucking & getting vored by a dog who doesn't even want her like that >rehearses every social interaction beforehand >apes what she thinks looks cool from her favorite movies >seethed so hard at pochita dating kobeni she made her brainwashed minions act like they'd want her
分かりました〜どちらかは完成後のお楽しみという事で...! ありがとうございます!
Another example of virulent leftist racism. I bet this bigot sees herself as 'antiracist' too. Mind you, the subject had nothing at all to do with Israel or zionism. The premisse was a Jew criticising a Jewish politician regarding AS in Britain, none of her Aryan ass business. Look at this filth
Suggestie. Drukken op verkiezingsaffiches/flyers met duidelijk de boodschapper er op.
El alcalde de la ciudad da la bienvenida a sus Majestades y les hace entrega de las llaves de la ciudad
gente, é simples:
What word does it contain:
왜 클립을 따면 0까지 듣고 ㅇㅋ했는데 결과물은 끝이 -1 아니면 +1로 뜰까 줘팸
“ now you flatter me. ”
(헐...대박...저거 사람 아니네 진짜.)(카페 옆자리에서 듣고 있음)
実は漫画書く人になりたかった→校内新聞でグロ系の四コマ描いて職員室で大問題になる→やめた→推しCPのアンソロにてノーマークだった字書きの小説に衝撃を受ける→私も字書きになりてぇ!!!!なる!!!!→現在に至る
Christianity and Game of Thrones have been a disaster for narrative media, every creator is like “who’s the martyr? We need a blood sacrifice!”
jag tror också att det är nåt som måste bedömas från fall till fall.
i've heard about this in a couple different vids & nobody has explained that part so i can only conclude that the creature's just THAT f****n' greedy
2. artikel des nicäno-konstantinopolitanums ist bekannt?
Pero mientras no salga de su carpeta pues mas o menos es fácil de solucionar, si llegan a internet ya olvídate, entre que las paginas no lo quitan y empiezan a resubirlas a otros portales al final no hay forma de detenerlo
As millions of Americans pull out of the Insurance industry’s pool, prices will rise for ALL Americans, because FOR PROFIT INDUSTRIES DON’T GIVE UP MONEY! THIS IS ALL TO SQUEEZE THE LAST DROP OF BLOOD FROM THE MIDDLE CLASS.
Snow Crash?
Thank you, Michael.
本編終わったし誰も書かないなら追記しようかな
du darfst sowieso alles
The Business Council of Australia is working with zionist Jillian Segal…surprise surprise
Βαποράκι κατά δήλωση της συζύγου του,στην παλιά μου γειτονιά στο κέντρο έδωσε σε βρεφάκι μηνών, δεν αποτελεί δικαιολογία προφανώς αλλά ήταν κι ο ίδιος χρήστης Αλισβερίσι γινόταν στην πλατεία καμιά 200 μέτρα παρακάτω, εκεί που κατά διαβολική σύμπτωση, στάθμευε μόνιμα μια κλούβα Περίεργα πράγματα!
Nem os giros grátis da Betano tão pagando Deus simplesmente me abandonou
美麗〜〜〜〜〜〜!!!!
仕事の同僚に〜してもろたとか、同僚が〜と言ってたみたいな呟きって、特定厨の格好の獲物だと思うんだけど、大丈夫なのか心配になるな とは言え警戒心薄くて仲良くなれやすそうではある 可愛いヤツだなとは思うが
차정우 즉 프라우/ 어쩌란 거예요
【AUTO】ヤアヤアッ!!
редовно слагам закваската в студено мляко от хладилника и пак става, само увеличавам времето с час-два. най-много да не е много кисело, но следващото ще е, ако ползваш закваска от предната партида, а не нова.
Nobody could touch them cuz they were "respectable" public office workers.
Pendientacos BIEN. Pendientacos > pendientitos
Na wer hätte das gedacht. Grasser bekommt durch ein neues Gesetz eine Fußfessel und darf den Rest seiner kurzen Haft zu Hause in Kitzbühel verbringen. Offenbar ist vieles möglich, wenn man wegen Bestechlichkeit verurteilt wurde.
通話にお邪魔するために寒さに挫けていたけど外に出ます
Perhaps it's one of those things that falls in and out of fashion?
昨日今日で30時間超働いたことにより、肩腰足が砕け散った
My goodness.
훈수둘거면 돈주면서해 2단어 이상부터 추가금 받습니다 (5만원부터 시작)
Oh nice
♡Kate
Five new coin designs have been revealed by The Royal Mint, commemorating milestones and anniversaries in 2026
去年の話です。
Io non ci sono! È uno scandalo!
無事!!!!帰宅!!!! つかれた!!ほんま弾丸やった!! ちょっとXに浮上する気力は無いっす
And I have to work Sunday too so I’m going to be all out of sorts
こんにちは 下手な絵や雑な文章を書く(自称)18歳のJKです
Just don't use "Kindle", it's owned by Bezos.
This concludes our regularly-scheduled indigestion hour
15.社会のせんせーがメロすぎて常にメロついてる
Enjoy the coffee while I suck your cock.
No man will say, "There is no God" 'till he is so hardened in sin that it hasbecome his interest that there should be none to call him to account.
やばいこれBL売りされてたの許せなさすぎる違う違う違う違う違うそうじゃ そうじゃない(鈴木雅之)
贖の立ち絵描いてた!!こんな感じになりそう!!
Christ. Kinkiboi Taboo arrives Summer 2026 #taboo #gay #gsyfantasy
Fire tackled at £3.5m 19th Century country house #Oxon #Oxfordshire
そもそも取り込んだ私の絵をアナログと言ってる時点で見る目が全く無いんですよ…フルデジタルです(iPad Pro/Procreate)
*literally, dangit
youtu.be/aZWaUzZkdys
カートくんみたく陸軍での 顔のこってるマックスくんを かいてるひといないね~
隙間風が寒い。机の右に窓があるから右手が寒い。マウス持つ手が寒い。
Good luck!
... shrek..?
C’est là que l’on reconnaît les vrais professionnels. En pleine forme pour bosser.
“A joy that wears down the rock of no." —Cornelius Eady m.youtube.com/watch?v=cjYQ...
This is still letting them off easy, because the previous SARS-CoV was already shown to be airborne sixteen years prior. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15102999/ It took some elaborate motivated rationalization to decide that was somehow irrelevant to SARS-CoV-2, and it needed to be retested from scratch.
RT @Ylnmnbleu: @1goodtern ignorance or maleficence? Either way we pay the price. https://t.co/ImgHIDv1uM https://t.co/OlSEJb7Xsm
RT @Ylnmnbleu: @1goodtern ignorance or maleficence? Either way we pay the price. https://t.co/ImgHIDv1uM https://t.co/OlSEJb7Xsm
@1goodtern ignorance or maleficence? Either way we pay the price. https://t.co/ImgHIDv1uM https://t.co/OlSEJb7Xsm
@DrTomFrieden Why weren’t lessons from SARS applied to SARS2 aka COVID-19? https://t.co/tVZPzFpN9C Fauci was part of disastrous initial official denial of SARS-CoV-2 airborne transmission, despite having sufficient evidence. Murderous downgrading from SARS1 protocols https://t.co/KQCEa2sAlp https://t.co/govo8BQRnj
@BC2015GA @PaulMuella @winwithwinsome Feb 8, 2020: Shanghai public health officials warn of evidence for airborne SARS2 transmission from outbreak case study https://t.co/uCK4N0hOe6 Also, SARS1 was proven airborne back in 2003 https://t.co/tVZPzFpfk4 CDC could’ve just kept SARS1 protocols https://t.co/KQCEa2s2vR
@breakfast_dogs @mdc_martinus @rwlander @loofymectin @BillyBostickson @billwilliam321 @stevenemassey @tommy_cleary @JOHNJOHNSTONED versions of the studies so you don't have to read a write-up dependent on the viewpoint of someone who thought aerosols were only smaller than 5 microns. Here is the 2004 study. https://t.co/u2KkJPi2iS Dr. Ki of course featured heavily in the story behind the scenes where
RT @EvonneTCurran: Amoy Gardens 2004 report Stop saying there WAS no evidence for airborne - there was ... lots of it. There was NO evide…
SARS 1 -2004 Same size, same family, same entry point pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15102999/
RT @LazarusLong13: @Lalalalaa_awful Amoy gardens with SARS 1 https://t.co/u2KkJPi2iS
@Lalalalaa_awful Amoy gardens with SARS 1 https://t.co/u2KkJPi2iS
The disparity was there from day 1 and many of us noticed they were cherry picking the science. So I started to do my own research into the first SARS outbreak. This had been described as airborne and they defeated it with good public health advice and masking. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15102999/
RT @maolesen: @djtonytoni Clear evidence of disease transmission from SARS. https://t.co/vdz3Ki1GLC And we didn't learn our lesson this t…
RT @maolesen: @djtonytoni Clear evidence of disease transmission from SARS. https://t.co/vdz3Ki1GLC And we didn't learn our lesson this t…
@djtonytoni Clear evidence of disease transmission from SARS. https://t.co/vdz3Ki1GLC And we didn't learn our lesson this time either. https://t.co/LhwkqVi4Nz
Bonnie didn’t know? Or all y’all at IPAC
sur la base de la littérature scientifique disponible incluant celle documentant l’épidémie de SRAS en 2003 (ci-dessous). Prenant ses distances avec les affirmations contradictoires de l’OMS, mais en accord avec les bases d’un « Plan de retour du bureau » des Nations Unies (mai 2020). 4/
@TheRoosterOld @JOKAQARMY1 https://t.co/tVZPzFpfk4
@BryanTegomoh @DrTedros @WHO SARS-CoV-1 aka SARS was proven airborne in 2004: https://t.co/tVZPzFpfk4 Why *wouldn’t* SARS-CoV-2 be airborne? More info here: https://t.co/4eB8h2rWvR https://t.co/ZqdVwv4Ixj
@OttoKolbl @JMooreP3 For precedent, assertion of inter-floor SARS-CoV-1 transmission in another high-rise apartment building back in 2003: Yu et al, “Evidence of Airborne Transmission of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Virus”, New England Journal of Medicine (2004), https://t.co/kDXB2x5tAh 6/6
RT @solutions_covid: Like SARS-1, SARS-2 is airborne. #CovidIsAirborne #WearARespirator
@1goodtern https://t.co/eUEH8d0OfA
@PrettyDamnedHot @lviau1 @WhiteHouse Not me, but others definitely were In particular, aerosol scientists who had studied SARS1 transmission & epidemiologists working early SARS2 case studies. Both urgently warned of airborne transmission. https://t.co/tVZPzFpfk4 https://t.co/uCK4N0hOe6 https://t.co/KVMgEc5tA0
@AlkernS71 @HeartlandUKEU Public health officials need to be held accountable for malfeasance & negligence for official denial of airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 SARS1 proven airborne in 2004 https://t.co/tVZPzFpfk4 Why *wouldn’t* SARS2 be airborne? https://t.co/4eB8h2rWvR https://t.co/mJndvhYg8i
@mamasaurusMeg @booyah2yah @luckytran *SARS-CoV-1, that is, aka SARS https://t.co/tVZPzFpfk4 SARS-CoV-2 aka covid is airborne too & comprehensive reviews have found: “High-quality studies have shown that use of face masks in the community is associated w/ reduced transmission of SARS-CoV-2” https://t.co/glFk97mRtT
@somewhatsecserv @NavyChief77 @quorumcaller @agraybee Then, despite Ryan’s comments just months prior shown above, despite SARS1 having been proven airborne in 2004 (https://t.co/tVZPzFpfk4), despite emerging epidemiology announced Feb 8th (https://t.co/uCK4N0hOe6), Ryan did this Feb 11th: https://t.co/4x6XfUHQzh
@ID_Denmark @Tyler_A_Harper @19joho Call it ineptitude &/or malfeasance if you want The facts remain that SARS-CoV-1 was proven airborne in 2004 (acknowledged in prior public comments by Ryan): https://t.co/tVZPzFpfk4 emerging epidemiology indicated airborne SARS-CoV-2: https://t.co/uCK4N0hOe6 Not their best. https://t.co/6FeSJWhc4T
Key info for me in 2020 that alerted me to the fact the information we were hearing wasn’t correct. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15102999/
@ringothe5th @1TrophyWife1 @SamanthaPfaff @StopMaskingKids @MosquitoCoasty @ComatoseGoat @1snarkymom @666airzz @Realist87982417 @bennydeez1 @thefakemd81 Emphasis on “lyingly” https://t.co/QC0CvAazDd https://t.co/tVZPzFpfk4 https://t.co/KQCEa2s2vR
@1TrophyWife1 @SamanthaPfaff @ringothe5th @StopMaskingKids @MosquitoCoasty @ComatoseGoat @1snarkymom @666airzz @Realist87982417 @bennydeez1 @thefakemd81 Millions of people died as a result of official denial of airborne transmission; many millions more disabled. Everyone has suffered. SARS1 proven airborne in 2004 https://t.co/tVZPzFpfk4 https://t.co/QT3SV4r6Qt SARS1 ultimately contained So why this?: https://t.co/DDVk6J6N0i
RT @maolesen: @Meghanduggan1 We knew this going back to SARS-1 at the Amoy Garden hotel. https://t.co/vdz3Ki2eBa
RT @maolesen: @Meghanduggan1 We knew this going back to SARS-1 at the Amoy Garden hotel. https://t.co/vdz3Ki2eBa
@Meghanduggan1 We knew this going back to SARS-1 at the Amoy Garden hotel. https://t.co/vdz3Ki2eBa
@MKjrstad @om_rxd https://t.co/3xzNj7H9DG Yes, airborne.
"what frustrates me even more today is that it seems we still haven't learned from our past mistakes, #CleanAir #Mitigation #Healthcaresettings " https://t.co/Qv8B2EfAcj
Yeah, but now we're mixing cause and effect because doctors take their guidance from public health agencies to some degree There were already plenty of studies showing that SARS-CoV1 was airborne! pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15102999/
@JOHNJOHNSTONED @jim_reed @JeremyFarrar @doctorsoumya @vismitag @mvankerkhove 2004 https://t.co/Q6sddf7zSR
@jim_reed @MichaelRosenYes Check SARS 2003 "Evidence of airborne transmission of the severe acute respiratory syndrome virus" https://t.co/Q6sddf7zSR
@WHUT @danaparish Nope. Sorry. SARS, aka SARS-CoV-1, was proven to be airborne in 2004 https://t.co/tVZPzFpN9C Feb 2020 epidemiology -> airborne https://t.co/uCK4N0im3E Aerosol sizes characterized in 2009 https://t.co/G4o2VmgAEn Official denial of airborne transmission in 2020 was malfeasance.
RT @MurrayJohn2000: @cv_cev https://t.co/Q6sddf7zSR https://t.co/kk2R9OCH3J
@cv_cev https://t.co/Q6sddf7zSR https://t.co/kk2R9OCH3J
@mdc_martinus https://t.co/Q6sddf7zSR https://t.co/9HkxTIqjKj
RT @ELHopkins: I started to read about the SARS outbreak in 2003 and it talked about airborne spread. I thought to myself why would this be…
RT @ELHopkins: I started to read about the SARS outbreak in 2003 and it talked about airborne spread. I thought to myself why would this be…
@mvankerkhove WHY? HOW? Be a whistleblower! Think of how much death & disability you STILL prevent. YOU CAN SAVE LIVES with an explicit mea culpa & high profile exposé of malfeasance, incompetence, & negligence that led to official denial of airborne transmission. https://t.co/tVZPzFpfk4 https://t.co/FrLli6CQNR https://t.co/bno44SqUAt
RT @murraygilman: @rwlander @EMM_386 Even though SARS-1 had airborne spread well documented in 2004 https://t.co/AySPVyYQhF
@rwlander @EMM_386 Even though SARS-1 had airborne spread well documented in 2004 https://t.co/AySPVyYQhF
@Connect36580822 @MailOnline Obfuscating the relatedness between SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 early in the pandemic was especially tragic b/c SARS-CoV-1 was proven to be airborne in 2004 https://t.co/tVZPzFpfk4 PPE against airborne SARS-CoV-1/2 transmission had already been established https://t.co/KQCEa2s2vR
RT @danwalker9999: @Mark_Ungrin @DrWinterhorn For SARS1, both aerosol transmission and long-term sequelae were documented in the scientific…
@Mark_Ungrin @DrWinterhorn For SARS1, both aerosol transmission and long-term sequelae were documented in the scientific literature well before 2020. It is unforgivable that this knowledge was not incorporated into pandemic planning and response. e.g. https://t.co/55fwQlWvLt https://t.co/yD7vHOVm6h
@ANy22917183 @_CatintheHat Indeed SARS-CoV-1, aka SARS, was proven airborne in 2004 https://t.co/tVZPzFpfk4 And February 2020 epidemiology on SARS-CoV-2 indicated airborne transmission https://t.co/uCK4N0hOe6 Scientists who are topic experts tried to warn but were ignored https://t.co/DOPeNPXWz8
RT @PoeBrianL: SARS, aka SARS-CoV-1, was proven airborne in 2004: https://t.co/tVZPzFpfk4 I hope everyone with sense wakes up and realizes…
@Mitchbitch65 @NurseIngrid2 I don’t for a second think he’s being forthright about *when* that information was known with reasonable certainty. I’d say it was circa 2004 https://t.co/tVZPzFpfk4 Still, I see utility in him publicly stating factually correct things even if tragically and malfeasantly late.
RT @PoeBrianL: SARS, aka SARS-CoV-1, was proven airborne in 2004: https://t.co/tVZPzFpfk4 I hope everyone with sense wakes up and realizes…
@Th3Pr0f3 @kprather88 George, please read this https://t.co/DOPeNPXWz8 Note that SARS-CoV-1 was proven airborne in 2004 https://t.co/tVZPzFpfk4 epidemiology in Feb 2020 strongly suggested airborne SARS2 transmission https://t.co/uCK4N0hOe6 The science was solid. Politicians dithered and obfuscated.
RT @PoeBrianL: SARS, aka SARS-CoV-1, was proven airborne in 2004: https://t.co/tVZPzFpfk4 I hope everyone with sense wakes up and realizes…
SARS, aka SARS-CoV-1, was proven airborne in 2004: https://t.co/tVZPzFpfk4 I hope everyone with sense wakes up and realizes the SARS-CoV-2 response was botched in most countries (denial of airborne transmission, inadequate PPE) And I hope they realize it still is. Then fix it! https://t.co/RYE9VHfiif
@inkblue01 It was very quickly obvious in HK SARS CoV 2 was airborne from early epidemiology, even just from contact tracing. Why didn’t the WHO take this onboard? Why didn’t they believe SARS 1 was airborne despite that being obviously so as well? https://t.co/MEe5NpY6NC https://t.co/KUitdehM6t
RT @Violet_Kitteee: 2004 (SARS1) “Airborne spread of the virus appears to explain this large community outbreak of SARS, and future efforts…
RT @Violet_Kitteee: 2004 (SARS1) “Airborne spread of the virus appears to explain this large community outbreak of SARS, and future efforts…
2004 (SARS1) “Airborne spread of the virus appears to explain this large community outbreak of SARS, and future efforts at prevention and control must take into consideration the potential for airborne spread of this virus” https://t.co/FIZX7gUjnt https://t.co/DgYGIRXfyL
@jim_reed This is where further investigation is needed. Covid 19 derives from a SARS virus. SARS was proven airborne in 2004. MERS was shown to be airborne in 2018.Yet airborne transmission of Covid19 wasn't immediately considered? Odd.
RT @CoyoteSanctuary: @kalashnikity @Bork10Bork @53v3n0fn1n3 @CumberpatchM @CavnerJeffery @tpvsean @NestCommander @ADpewpewerX @JCPEREZCODEX…
@kalashnikity @Bork10Bork @53v3n0fn1n3 @CumberpatchM @CavnerJeffery @tpvsean @NestCommander @ADpewpewerX @JCPEREZCODEX https://t.co/49APcHWJFO https://t.co/6KpAnD9E5q
RT @ClareCraigPath: https://t.co/fpuVyggv0B
https://t.co/fpuVyggv0B
@Rattler347 @WHO @dcexaminer That article you just linked is from 2020 and it was inaccurate at the time of its publication. 1998 https://t.co/bH2svwnIhm 2008 https://t.co/XQw1WBtMEO SARS-CoV-1 was proven airborne in 2004 https://t.co/tVZPzFpN9C Topic experts were ignored in 2020 https://t.co/DOPeNPYuoG
@ashyoisho @catameep @GrGuenter @urbanmel Here's the 2003 Hong Kong Hotel paper about SARS-1, it's a good paper: https://t.co/VrOBLexEs1
@thecardsharp2 @citlanx @brailemom @Don_Milton Infectious bioaerosol dynamics research is relevant to covid. Same vehicle, different passenger. https://t.co/tVZPzFpN9C There are biophysical & epidemiological differences to consider but the physics are broadly applicable. https://t.co/G2T9vQ8tY6 https://t.co/vVBpr2B5cQ
@MichelleSa51266 @RobertaGleicher @CDCgov Humanity managed to contain SARS-CoV-1 in 2004, the closest cousin to SARS-CoV-2. https://t.co/tVZPzFpfk4 And before that we had tremendous success with water sanitation and vaccination. Get over your Semmelweis Reflex and get caught up already! Or maybe retire if you won’t.
@BuildABot2 @michael_hoerger @CDCgov It did. Recommendation of inadequate PPE & interventions was based, or at least justified, on a faulty understanding of SARS-CoV-2 transmission. More info https://t.co/VjKQsUr8Ml https://t.co/DOPeNPYuoG https://t.co/tVZPzFpN9C https://t.co/uCK4N0im3E https://t.co/QC0CvAb7sL
RT @PoeBrianL: @JOHNJOHNSTONED @JudahWorldChamp @DrTedros @doctorsoumya @JeremyFarrar @mvankerkhove @SCBriand @vismitag @kakape @hans_kluge…
RT @PoeBrianL: @JOHNJOHNSTONED @JudahWorldChamp @DrTedros @doctorsoumya @JeremyFarrar @mvankerkhove @SCBriand @vismitag @kakape @hans_kluge…
RT @PoeBrianL: @JOHNJOHNSTONED @JudahWorldChamp @DrTedros @doctorsoumya @JeremyFarrar @mvankerkhove @SCBriand @vismitag @kakape @hans_kluge…
RT @PoeBrianL: @JOHNJOHNSTONED @JudahWorldChamp @DrTedros @doctorsoumya @JeremyFarrar @mvankerkhove @SCBriand @vismitag @kakape @hans_kluge…
RT @PoeBrianL: @JOHNJOHNSTONED @JudahWorldChamp @DrTedros @doctorsoumya @JeremyFarrar @mvankerkhove @SCBriand @vismitag @kakape @hans_kluge…
RT @PoeBrianL: @JOHNJOHNSTONED @JudahWorldChamp @DrTedros @doctorsoumya @JeremyFarrar @mvankerkhove @SCBriand @vismitag @kakape @hans_kluge…
RT @PoeBrianL: @JOHNJOHNSTONED @JudahWorldChamp @DrTedros @doctorsoumya @JeremyFarrar @mvankerkhove @SCBriand @vismitag @kakape @hans_kluge…
RT @PoeBrianL: @JOHNJOHNSTONED @JudahWorldChamp @DrTedros @doctorsoumya @JeremyFarrar @mvankerkhove @SCBriand @vismitag @kakape @hans_kluge…
RT @PoeBrianL: @JOHNJOHNSTONED @JudahWorldChamp @DrTedros @doctorsoumya @JeremyFarrar @mvankerkhove @SCBriand @vismitag @kakape @hans_kluge…
RT @PoeBrianL: @JOHNJOHNSTONED @JudahWorldChamp @DrTedros @doctorsoumya @JeremyFarrar @mvankerkhove @SCBriand @vismitag @kakape @hans_kluge…
@JOHNJOHNSTONED @JudahWorldChamp @DrTedros @doctorsoumya @JeremyFarrar @mvankerkhove @SCBriand @vismitag @kakape @hans_kluge @MoetiTshidi @DrAbdiMahamud And in case anyone has any doubts that Mike Ryan knew it was airborne and certainly should have if adequately competent to serve in that role— SARS1 proven airborne in 2004 https://t.co/tVZPzFpfk4 SARS2 early epidemiology showed it was airborne, Feb 2020 https://t.co/uCK4N0hOe6
Żeby było ciekawiej to 20 lat temu SARS też był airborne ... https://t.co/TTEZo90pEP
@VoterScumbag @theserfstv He was wrong. SARS-CoV-1, aka SARS, was proven airborne in 2004: https://t.co/tVZPzFpfk4 Why *wouldn’t* SARS-CoV-2 be airborne? He should have known better. That was a major and deadly blunder.
RT @pan_accindex: “Nobody knew in March 2020 that SARS-COV-2 was airborne!” We knew from SARS-COV-1 in 2004. And so did WHO’s Tedros. Then…
RT @pan_accindex: “Nobody knew in March 2020 that SARS-COV-2 was airborne!” We knew from SARS-COV-1 in 2004. And so did WHO’s Tedros. Then…
RT @pan_accindex: “Nobody knew in March 2020 that SARS-COV-2 was airborne!” We knew from SARS-COV-1 in 2004. And so did WHO’s Tedros. Then…
RT @pan_accindex: “Nobody knew in March 2020 that SARS-COV-2 was airborne!” We knew from SARS-COV-1 in 2004. And so did WHO’s Tedros. Then…
RT @pan_accindex: “Nobody knew in March 2020 that SARS-COV-2 was airborne!” We knew from SARS-COV-1 in 2004. And so did WHO’s Tedros. Then…
RT @pan_accindex: @TaylorLorenz Mind you, this qualified sociologist could not be bothered to check if SARS-COV-1 was documented as airborn…
RT @pan_accindex: “Nobody knew in March 2020 that SARS-COV-2 was airborne!” We knew from SARS-COV-1 in 2004. And so did WHO’s Tedros. Then…
@DrEricDing SARS-COV-1 was confirmed airborne in 2004. Anyone with a phone and internet search could confirm this. “Military term” my butt. https://t.co/HBOxaBBPQh
RT @pan_accindex: “Nobody knew in March 2020 that SARS-COV-2 was airborne!” We knew from SARS-COV-1 in 2004. And so did WHO’s Tedros. Then…
RT @pan_accindex: “Nobody knew in March 2020 that SARS-COV-2 was airborne!” We knew from SARS-COV-1 in 2004. And so did WHO’s Tedros. Then…
RT @pan_accindex: “Nobody knew in March 2020 that SARS-COV-2 was airborne!” We knew from SARS-COV-1 in 2004. And so did WHO’s Tedros. Then…
RT @pan_accindex: “Nobody knew in March 2020 that SARS-COV-2 was airborne!” We knew from SARS-COV-1 in 2004. And so did WHO’s Tedros. Then…
RT @pan_accindex: “Nobody knew in March 2020 that SARS-COV-2 was airborne!” We knew from SARS-COV-1 in 2004. And so did WHO’s Tedros. Then…
RT @pan_accindex: “Nobody knew in March 2020 that SARS-COV-2 was airborne!” We knew from SARS-COV-1 in 2004. And so did WHO’s Tedros. Then…
RT @pan_accindex: “Nobody knew in March 2020 that SARS-COV-2 was airborne!” We knew from SARS-COV-1 in 2004. And so did WHO’s Tedros. Then…
“Nobody knew in March 2020 that SARS-COV-2 was airborne!” We knew from SARS-COV-1 in 2004. And so did WHO’s Tedros. Then his boss told him to refer to “airborne” as a “military term.” https://t.co/HBOxaBBPQh
@TheSheepcat @TaylorLorenz SARS-COV-1 was identified as airborne in 2004: https://t.co/HBOxaBBPQh 2010 paper establishing long term harms of SARS-COV-1 infection: https://t.co/QSoRmIicJY The precedent was already established in the scientific literature and easy to reference.
@TaylorLorenz Mind you, this qualified sociologist could not be bothered to check if SARS-COV-1 was documented as airborne. Back in 2004. https://t.co/HBOxaBBPQh
@ScienceMagazine https://t.co/bVKHQy87as
RT @danwalker9999: @Rebecca21951651 @LawrenceGostin @mvankerkhove @DrTedros Dr Fauci wishes that he’d known sooner about airborne* transmis…
@Rebecca21951651 @LawrenceGostin @mvankerkhove @DrTedros Dr Fauci wishes that he’d known sooner about airborne* transmission of SARS2 https://t.co/ruVjrqT90K He would have known in 2004, if he’d been keeping up on SARS1 https://t.co/bVKHQy87as *he uses “aerosol transmission”; technically correct, but avoids the word “airborne” https://t.co/kGm7TeSA2e
@AndrewinH70355 @ScienceBlog3 @tatsie1973 @BStoleman @TonyClimate Fauci is one of the key culprits of mishandling the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, at least in the US. Bear in mind that SARS1 was proven airborne in 2004: https://t.co/tVZPzFpN9C No excuse to deny airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 or necessity and efficacy of respiratory PPE in 2020.
RT @elisaperego78: Another reminder that SARS-CoV, the close "cousin" of SARS-CoV-2, was flagged as airborne already in the early 2000s. Po…
RT @elisaperego78: Another reminder that SARS-CoV, the close "cousin" of SARS-CoV-2, was flagged as airborne already in the early 2000s. Po…
RT @elisaperego78: Another reminder that SARS-CoV, the close "cousin" of SARS-CoV-2, was flagged as airborne already in the early 2000s. Po…
RT @elisaperego78: Another reminder that SARS-CoV, the close "cousin" of SARS-CoV-2, was flagged as airborne already in the early 2000s. Po…
RT @elisaperego78: Another reminder that SARS-CoV, the close "cousin" of SARS-CoV-2, was flagged as airborne already in the early 2000s. Po…
RT @elisaperego78: Another reminder that SARS-CoV, the close "cousin" of SARS-CoV-2, was flagged as airborne already in the early 2000s. Po…
RT @elisaperego78: Another reminder that SARS-CoV, the close "cousin" of SARS-CoV-2, was flagged as airborne already in the early 2000s. Po…
RT @elisaperego78: Another reminder that SARS-CoV, the close "cousin" of SARS-CoV-2, was flagged as airborne already in the early 2000s. Po…
RT @elisaperego78: Another reminder that SARS-CoV, the close "cousin" of SARS-CoV-2, was flagged as airborne already in the early 2000s. Po…
RT @elisaperego78: Another reminder that SARS-CoV, the close "cousin" of SARS-CoV-2, was flagged as airborne already in the early 2000s. Po…
RT @elisaperego78: Another reminder that SARS-CoV, the close "cousin" of SARS-CoV-2, was flagged as airborne already in the early 2000s. Po…
RT @elisaperego78: A kind reminder that SARS-CoV-1, the close cousin of SARS-CoV-2, was already flagged as airborne in the early 2000s. Any…
RT @elisaperego78: Another reminder that SARS-CoV, the close "cousin" of SARS-CoV-2, was flagged as airborne already in the early 2000s. Po…
RT @elisaperego78: Another reminder that SARS-CoV, the close "cousin" of SARS-CoV-2, was flagged as airborne already in the early 2000s. Po…
RT @elisaperego78: Another reminder that SARS-CoV, the close "cousin" of SARS-CoV-2, was flagged as airborne already in the early 2000s. Po…
RT @noren_elisabeth: Efter SARS1 i början av 2000-talet visste man att 1) smittan spreds via luft 2) SARS-smittade kunde drabbas av kronisk…
RT @elisaperego78: A kind reminder that SARS-CoV-1, the close cousin of SARS-CoV-2, was already flagged as airborne in the early 2000s. Any…
RT @elisaperego78: @ashishkjha There was evidence published since the early 2000s that SARS-CoV, the close "cousin of SARS-CoV-2, was airbo…
RT @elisaperego78: @ashishkjha There was evidence published since the early 2000s that SARS-CoV, the close "cousin of SARS-CoV-2, was airbo…
RT @elisaperego78: A kind reminder that SARS-CoV-1, the close cousin of SARS-CoV-2, was already flagged as airborne in the early 2000s. Any…
RT @elisaperego78: A kind reminder that SARS-CoV-1, the close cousin of SARS-CoV-2, was already flagged as airborne in the early 2000s. Any…
RT @elisaperego78: A kind reminder that SARS-CoV-1, the close cousin of SARS-CoV-2, was already flagged as airborne in the early 2000s. Any…
RT @elisaperego78: Another reminder that SARS-CoV, the close "cousin" of SARS-CoV-2, was flagged as airborne already in the early 2000s. Po…
RT @elisaperego78: A kind reminder that SARS-CoV-1, the close cousin of SARS-CoV-2, was already flagged as airborne in the early 2000s. Any…
RT @elisaperego78: A kind reminder that SARS-CoV-1, the close cousin of SARS-CoV-2, was already flagged as airborne in the early 2000s. Any…
RT @elisaperego78: Another reminder that SARS-CoV, the close "cousin" of SARS-CoV-2, was flagged as airborne already in the early 2000s. Po…
RT @elisaperego78: Another reminder that SARS-CoV, the close "cousin" of SARS-CoV-2, was flagged as airborne already in the early 2000s. Po…
RT @elisaperego78: Another reminder that SARS-CoV, the close "cousin" of SARS-CoV-2, was flagged as airborne already in the early 2000s. Po…
RT @elisaperego78: Another reminder that SARS-CoV, the close "cousin" of SARS-CoV-2, was flagged as airborne already in the early 2000s. Po…
RT @elisaperego78: A kind reminder that SARS-CoV-1, the close cousin of SARS-CoV-2, was already flagged as airborne in the early 2000s. Any…
RT @elisaperego78: Another reminder that SARS-CoV, the close "cousin" of SARS-CoV-2, was flagged as airborne already in the early 2000s. Po…
RT @elisaperego78: A kind reminder that SARS-CoV-1, the close cousin of SARS-CoV-2, was already flagged as airborne in the early 2000s. Any…
RT @dreamy_run: @SKGandhiMD It has been known for *decades* that SARS coronaviruses are airborne, which means officials knew from the very…
RT @dreamy_run: @SKGandhiMD It has been known for *decades* that SARS coronaviruses are airborne, which means officials knew from the very…
RT @dreamy_run: @SKGandhiMD It has been known for *decades* that SARS coronaviruses are airborne, which means officials knew from the very…
@SKGandhiMD It has been known for *decades* that SARS coronaviruses are airborne, which means officials knew from the very beginning of the pandemic that they should be recommending airborne protections. They preferred death & disability & a destroyed LT economy. https://t.co/pFORjzcNsJ
RT @Leseerlaubnis: @DaniBeckman Can I assist you with some studies? Because they didn't know what happens in the brain, they thought peopl…
RT @Leseerlaubnis: @DaniBeckman Can I assist you with some studies? Because they didn't know what happens in the brain, they thought peopl…
RT @Leseerlaubnis: @DaniBeckman Can I assist you with some studies? Because they didn't know what happens in the brain, they thought peopl…
RT @Leseerlaubnis: @DaniBeckman Can I assist you with some studies? Because they didn't know what happens in the brain, they thought peopl…
RT @Leseerlaubnis: @DaniBeckman Can I assist you with some studies? Because they didn't know what happens in the brain, they thought peopl…
RT @Leseerlaubnis: @DaniBeckman Can I assist you with some studies? Because they didn't know what happens in the brain, they thought peopl…
RT @Leseerlaubnis: @DaniBeckman Can I assist you with some studies? Because they didn't know what happens in the brain, they thought peopl…
RT @Leseerlaubnis: @DaniBeckman Can I assist you with some studies? Because they didn't know what happens in the brain, they thought peopl…
RT @Leseerlaubnis: @DaniBeckman Can I assist you with some studies? Because they didn't know what happens in the brain, they thought peopl…
@DaniBeckman Can I assist you with some studies? Because they didn't know what happens in the brain, they thought people had mental health problems. 2004: They knew SARS is airborne https://t.co/OpGyOBBcvp 2005: https://t.co/VHqGqa21kX 2009: Long-term psychiatric morbidities among SARS
RT @Leseerlaubnis: @mdc_martinus @WHO @JeremyFarrar 2004 - they knew https://t.co/OpGyOBBcvp https://t.co/gUns2ITS1Q
RT @Leseerlaubnis: @mdc_martinus @WHO @JeremyFarrar 2004 - they knew https://t.co/OpGyOBBcvp https://t.co/gUns2ITS1Q
RT @Leseerlaubnis: @mdc_martinus @WHO @JeremyFarrar 2004 - they knew https://t.co/OpGyOBBcvp https://t.co/gUns2ITS1Q
@mdc_martinus @WHO @JeremyFarrar 2004 - they knew https://t.co/OpGyOBBcvp https://t.co/gUns2ITS1Q
@rvandenhaak @MarionKoopmans @mkeulemans Juist. Het was de meest logische conclusie op basis van hetgeen we al wisten over de eigenschappen van sars-cov-1. En het had op z'n minst de aanname moeten zijn in het kader van pandemic response. https://t.co/VtKxsfJkNg
“Airborne spread of the virus appears to explain this large community outbreak of SARS, and future efforts at prevention and control must take into consideration the potential for airborne spread of this virus.” 2004 https://t.co/Royf2qLYyk https://t.co/jGI16uBJEs
@TheVertlartnic This is obviously strange because SARS-Cov-1 has always been airborne too and there is little genetic difference between SARS-Cov-1 and SARS-Cov-2. Like the @IPCC_CH the @WHO is now a political, not a scientific organisation. Apples can fall.. up?
RT @danwalker9999: @NjbBari3 @sameo416 Airborne transmission of SARS1 was well-documented 20 years ago. They knew. Perhaps the intent was i…
RT @danwalker9999: @NjbBari3 @sameo416 Airborne transmission of SARS1 was well-documented 20 years ago. They knew. Perhaps the intent was i…
RT @danwalker9999: @NjbBari3 @sameo416 Airborne transmission of SARS1 was well-documented 20 years ago. They knew. Perhaps the intent was i…
RT @danwalker9999: @NjbBari3 @sameo416 Airborne transmission of SARS1 was well-documented 20 years ago. They knew. Perhaps the intent was i…
RT @danwalker9999: @NjbBari3 @sameo416 Airborne transmission of SARS1 was well-documented 20 years ago. They knew. Perhaps the intent was i…
@NjbBari3 @sameo416 Airborne transmission of SARS1 was well-documented 20 years ago. They knew. Perhaps the intent was initially to avoid panic, and subsequently to avoid admission of error. Regardless … they knew. https://t.co/XJGEDcG1m7
RT @EvonneTCurran: Good chat Airborne dissemination via toilet plumes is an issue Amoy Gardens was essentially inhalation of toilet plume h…
RT @EvonneTCurran: Good chat Airborne dissemination via toilet plumes is an issue Amoy Gardens was essentially inhalation of toilet plume h…
RT @EvonneTCurran: Good chat Airborne dissemination via toilet plumes is an issue Amoy Gardens was essentially inhalation of toilet plume h…
RT @EvonneTCurran: Good chat Airborne dissemination via toilet plumes is an issue Amoy Gardens was essentially inhalation of toilet plume h…
RT @EvonneTCurran: Good chat Airborne dissemination via toilet plumes is an issue Amoy Gardens was essentially inhalation of toilet plume h…
RT @EvonneTCurran: Good chat Airborne dissemination via toilet plumes is an issue Amoy Gardens was essentially inhalation of toilet plume h…
RT @EvonneTCurran: Good chat Airborne dissemination via toilet plumes is an issue Amoy Gardens was essentially inhalation of toilet plume h…
Good chat Airborne dissemination via toilet plumes is an issue Amoy Gardens was essentially inhalation of toilet plume https://t.co/kHUvieuA51 https://t.co/ANJvE1nYse this one also puts the toilet in the frame for COVID & https://t.co/qjzilUFqrP give the physics HEPAs 4 loos? https://t.co/bJ2B4mxUL4
@1goodtern Airborne transmission of SARS1 was clearly documented in 2004. https://t.co/XJGEDcG1m7
@Soulgirl1RN @IrishEcocritic https://t.co/n6YzlML6EV https://t.co/7EkmK9YbTn
RT @danwalker9999: @jazzaoxon @DrTedros @WHO Airborne transmission was well-established for SARS-1 by 2004. https://t.co/nIj54RBUsK https:/…
RT @danwalker9999: @Mark_Ungrin @mvankerkhove @WHO A receipt, and a reminder of what was known about SARS-1 https://t.co/XJGEDcG1m7 https:/…
RT @danwalker9999: @Mark_Ungrin @mvankerkhove @WHO A receipt, and a reminder of what was known about SARS-1 https://t.co/XJGEDcG1m7 https:/…
RT @danwalker9999: @Mark_Ungrin @mvankerkhove @WHO A receipt, and a reminder of what was known about SARS-1 https://t.co/XJGEDcG1m7 https:/…
RT @danwalker9999: @Mark_Ungrin @mvankerkhove @WHO A receipt, and a reminder of what was known about SARS-1 https://t.co/XJGEDcG1m7 https:/…
@Mark_Ungrin @mvankerkhove @WHO A receipt, and a reminder of what was known about SARS-1 https://t.co/XJGEDcG1m7 https://t.co/BiGLED6O6Q https://t.co/Nl0vUGMXK3
@jazzaoxon @DrTedros @WHO Airborne transmission was well-established for SARS-1 by 2004. https://t.co/nIj54RBUsK https://t.co/wFnQwm6JZC
Evidence of Airborne Transmission of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Virus | NEJM https://t.co/WlcFIbJpR2
RT @danwalker9999: @mvankerkhove SARS1. Airborne transmission demonstrated in 2004. https://t.co/XJGEDcG1m7 https://t.co/115YySvpXc
RT @danwalker9999: @mvankerkhove SARS1. Airborne transmission demonstrated in 2004. https://t.co/XJGEDcG1m7 https://t.co/115YySvpXc
RT @danwalker9999: @mvankerkhove SARS1. Airborne transmission demonstrated in 2004. https://t.co/XJGEDcG1m7 https://t.co/115YySvpXc
RT @danwalker9999: @mvankerkhove SARS1. Airborne transmission demonstrated in 2004. https://t.co/XJGEDcG1m7 https://t.co/115YySvpXc
RT @danwalker9999: @mvankerkhove SARS1. Airborne transmission demonstrated in 2004. https://t.co/XJGEDcG1m7 https://t.co/115YySvpXc
RT @danwalker9999: @mvankerkhove SARS1. Airborne transmission demonstrated in 2004. https://t.co/XJGEDcG1m7 https://t.co/115YySvpXc
RT @danwalker9999: @mvankerkhove SARS1. Airborne transmission demonstrated in 2004. https://t.co/XJGEDcG1m7 https://t.co/115YySvpXc
RT @danwalker9999: @mvankerkhove SARS1. Airborne transmission demonstrated in 2004. https://t.co/XJGEDcG1m7 https://t.co/115YySvpXc
RT @danwalker9999: @mvankerkhove SARS1. Airborne transmission demonstrated in 2004. https://t.co/XJGEDcG1m7 https://t.co/115YySvpXc
RT @danwalker9999: @mvankerkhove SARS1. Airborne transmission demonstrated in 2004. https://t.co/XJGEDcG1m7 https://t.co/115YySvpXc
RT @danwalker9999: @mvankerkhove SARS1. Airborne transmission demonstrated in 2004. https://t.co/XJGEDcG1m7 https://t.co/115YySvpXc
@mvankerkhove SARS1. Airborne transmission demonstrated in 2004. https://t.co/XJGEDcG1m7 https://t.co/115YySvpXc
RT @catladyactivist: They ALSO knew SARS was airborne since at least 2004. If SARS1 was airborne, why did it take YEARS to admit the same w…
@FriedmanJas @WHO @CDCgov @UKHSA If googled SARS 2003 in 2020: "Airborne spread of the virus appears to explain this large community outbreak of SARS [2003], and future efforts at prevention and control must take into consideration the potential for airborne spread of this virus." https://t.co/rdz8J2GerX
RT @catladyactivist: They ALSO knew SARS was airborne since at least 2004. If SARS1 was airborne, why did it take YEARS to admit the same w…
RT @catladyactivist: They ALSO knew SARS was airborne since at least 2004. If SARS1 was airborne, why did it take YEARS to admit the same w…
RT @catladyactivist: They ALSO knew SARS was airborne since at least 2004. If SARS1 was airborne, why did it take YEARS to admit the same w…
RT @catladyactivist: They ALSO knew SARS was airborne since at least 2004. If SARS1 was airborne, why did it take YEARS to admit the same w…
RT @catladyactivist: They ALSO knew SARS was airborne since at least 2004. If SARS1 was airborne, why did it take YEARS to admit the same w…
RT @catladyactivist: They ALSO knew SARS was airborne since at least 2004. If SARS1 was airborne, why did it take YEARS to admit the same w…
RT @catladyactivist: They ALSO knew SARS was airborne since at least 2004. If SARS1 was airborne, why did it take YEARS to admit the same w…
RT @catladyactivist: They ALSO knew SARS was airborne since at least 2004. If SARS1 was airborne, why did it take YEARS to admit the same w…
RT @catladyactivist: They ALSO knew SARS was airborne since at least 2004. If SARS1 was airborne, why did it take YEARS to admit the same w…
RT @catladyactivist: They ALSO knew SARS was airborne since at least 2004. If SARS1 was airborne, why did it take YEARS to admit the same w…
RT @catladyactivist: They ALSO knew SARS was airborne since at least 2004. If SARS1 was airborne, why did it take YEARS to admit the same w…
RT @catladyactivist: They ALSO knew SARS was airborne since at least 2004. If SARS1 was airborne, why did it take YEARS to admit the same w…
RT @catladyactivist: They ALSO knew SARS was airborne since at least 2004. If SARS1 was airborne, why did it take YEARS to admit the same w…
RT @catladyactivist: They ALSO knew SARS was airborne since at least 2004. If SARS1 was airborne, why did it take YEARS to admit the same w…
RT @catladyactivist: They ALSO knew SARS was airborne since at least 2004. If SARS1 was airborne, why did it take YEARS to admit the same w…
RT @catladyactivist: They ALSO knew SARS was airborne since at least 2004. If SARS1 was airborne, why did it take YEARS to admit the same w…
RT @catladyactivist: They ALSO knew SARS was airborne since at least 2004. If SARS1 was airborne, why did it take YEARS to admit the same w…
RT @catladyactivist: They ALSO knew SARS was airborne since at least 2004. If SARS1 was airborne, why did it take YEARS to admit the same w…
RT @catladyactivist: They ALSO knew SARS was airborne since at least 2004. If SARS1 was airborne, why did it take YEARS to admit the same w…
RT @catladyactivist: They ALSO knew SARS was airborne since at least 2004. If SARS1 was airborne, why did it take YEARS to admit the same w…
RT @catladyactivist: They ALSO knew SARS was airborne since at least 2004. If SARS1 was airborne, why did it take YEARS to admit the same w…
RT @catladyactivist: They ALSO knew SARS was airborne since at least 2004. If SARS1 was airborne, why did it take YEARS to admit the same w…
RT @catladyactivist: They ALSO knew SARS was airborne since at least 2004. If SARS1 was airborne, why did it take YEARS to admit the same w…
They ALSO knew SARS was airborne since at least 2004. If SARS1 was airborne, why did it take YEARS to admit the same was true of SARS2? Follow the
RT @ELHopkins: I started to read about the SARS outbreak in 2003 and it talked about airborne spread. I thought to myself why would this be…
RT @ELHopkins: I started to read about the SARS outbreak in 2003 and it talked about airborne spread. I thought to myself why would this be…
RT @ELHopkins: I started to read about the SARS outbreak in 2003 and it talked about airborne spread. I thought to myself why would this be…
RT @ELHopkins: I started to read about the SARS outbreak in 2003 and it talked about airborne spread. I thought to myself why would this be…
RT @ELHopkins: I started to read about the SARS outbreak in 2003 and it talked about airborne spread. I thought to myself why would this be…
RT @ELHopkins: I started to read about the SARS outbreak in 2003 and it talked about airborne spread. I thought to myself why would this be…
RT @ELHopkins: I started to read about the SARS outbreak in 2003 and it talked about airborne spread. I thought to myself why would this be…
@PeteUK7 @CathNoakes @covidinquiryuk Evidence of Airborne Transmission of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Virus 2003 https://t.co/eUEH8d0OfA
Drame en 3 actes… 1 - 2004, Evidence of Airborne Transmission of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Virus https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa032867
RT @neznezxmail: まずは温故知新として、 Yu ITS, et al. Evidence of Airborne Transmission of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Virus. N Engl J Med…
RT @neznezxmail: まずは温故知新として、 Yu ITS, et al. Evidence of Airborne Transmission of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Virus. N Engl J Med…
RT @neznezxmail: まずは温故知新として、 Yu ITS, et al. Evidence of Airborne Transmission of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Virus. N Engl J Med…
まずは温故知新として、 Yu ITS, et al. Evidence of Airborne Transmission of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Virus. N Engl J Med 2004; 350:1731-1739. https://t.co/Lvtt4FORPj 有名なSARSのアモイガーデンアウトブレイク.糞便エアロゾル伝播が疑われた. 11)
RT @EquoAmicus: @t_thansen @business Did you read the article? The very case I am discussing is the same case in the story, except they are…
@DancesWithTamis This video touches on the answer to this question https://t.co/rvfcKWHiq6
RT @MedCramVideos: Coronavirus Epidemic Update 9: Fecal-Oral Transmission, Recovery vs Death Rate: https://t.co/N1qB0xL882 via @YouTube
RT @Eliz_Hightower: I have found a series of 35 update videos that has some awesome teaching & information about the virus, boosting your i…
RT @Eliz_Hightower: I have found a series of 35 update videos that has some awesome teaching & information about the virus, boosting your i…
I have found a series of 35 update videos that has some awesome teaching & information about the virus, boosting your immune system and treatments & more Coronavirus Epidemic Update 9: Fecal-Oral Transmission, Recovery vs Deat... https://t.co/vROgJ5TK3H
@PublicJeeErr @rivm @MerlotVine You are correct.#coronavirus https://t.co/aMVh5oiQ5X
some sources used: https://t.co/I5vg07WqIA https://t.co/ulNu40VFko https://t.co/pqFC1tIE2c
@grumpytrooper @ArchRose90 https://t.co/Eip50IQ0RM
#9 Coronavirus Epidemic Update 9: Fecal-Oral Transmission, Recovery vs Deat... #COVIDー19 https://t.co/oC21oUTfEI
RT @Scrappy94546226: - Coronavirus Epidemic Update 9: Fecal-Oral Transmission, Recovery vs Death Rate: https://t.co/VZRDdNr0Vf - Coronavir…
RT @Scrappy94546226: - Coronavirus Epidemic Update 9: Fecal-Oral Transmission, Recovery vs Death Rate: https://t.co/VZRDdNr0Vf - Coronavir…
- Coronavirus Epidemic Update 9: Fecal-Oral Transmission, Recovery vs Death Rate: https://t.co/VZRDdNr0Vf - Coronavirus Outbreak Update 8: Travel Ban, Spread Outside of China, Quarantine, & MRSA: https://t.co/y3vU3NoluX
Coronavirus Epidemic Update 9: Fecal-Oral Transmission, Recovery vs Deat... https://t.co/CuUaD6iCkk via @YouTube
@t_thansen @business Did you read the article? The very case I am discussing is the same case in the story, except they are not explaining that it went trough air vents. This Medcram org explained it much better. https://t.co/v0fgvkH9t8
@tomblackwellNP @nationalpost @liberal_party @ConradMBlack @acoyne Based on Lancet Article fatality rate is 15%. The denominator is number of people infected 10 days ago NOT number infected today. https://t.co/hhOyz3TtdP
https://t.co/5nP5PTSZfk
Coronavirus Epidemic Update 9: Fecal-Oral Transmission, Recovery vs Deat... https://t.co/r3wkGotMnX via @YouTube
https://t.co/hCogzgqMoi
Coronavirus Epidemic Update 9: Fecal-Oral Transmission, Recovery vs Deat... https://t.co/5Ii3EprTfG via @YouTube
@Sweetemmilyn Here's the video. You can skip ahead to 6:30 for the narrative about SARS spreading via "viral plume from diarrhea". You can't make this crap up! (Pun intended.) https://t.co/bHvLCarjH5
RT @shelleyshenton: Coronavirus Epidemic Update 9: Fecal-Oral Transmission, Recovery vs Deat... #coronavirus #CoronaVirusCanada https://t.c…
@radaghast_16115 i'm no doctor but thats what i have been suspecting too. the other problem is that the number of actual cases (mostly the mild ones ) is also probably underreported which would take the death rate down. this channel seems very good https://t.co/6SDHpcPhPi
https://t.co/mt2DJ3s8MK
Update on coronavirus https://t.co/r7wTuBlOZr
https://t.co/zEcujseloy Virus explained என்ற episode ல் சார்ஸ் வந்த போது பாதிக்கப்பட்ட நபர் toilet பயன்படுத்தி அதன் மூலம் அந்த அபார்ட்மெண்ட்ல் இருந்த மற்றவர்களுக்கு பரவியது. அது போல் corona virus லும் சாத்தியமுள்ளது என்கிறார்கள். Fecal oral transmission. சுகாதார துறை இது குறித்த
Coronavirus Epidemic Update 9: Fecal-Oral Transmission, Recovery vs Death Rate https://t.co/VZf4nbzY0k
Coronavirus Epidemic Update 9: Fecal-Oral Transmission, Recovery vs Deat... https://t.co/QlJEz2poT1 via @YouTube
بعض الإيجابيات و أخرى سلبيات عن #فيروس_كورونا #كورونا_فيروس منها احتمالية الانتقال عن طريق fecal oral route و هذا يعنى من فضلات الإنسان أكرمكم الله و احتمالية الحمامات "العربي " او المجارى المكشوفة تكون مصدر انتشار بواسطة الغازات التي تنبعث منها إلى الهواء https://t.co/giN1MvwS1k
Coronavirus Epidemic Update 9: Fecal-Oral Transmission, Recovery vs Deat... https://t.co/slVyNHE6g6 via @YouTube@misterantibully
Coronavirus Epidemic Update 9: Fecal-Oral Transmission, Recovery vs Deat... https://t.co/slVyNHE6g6 via @YouTube@mister anti-bully
Coronavirus Epidemic Update 9: Fecal-Oral Transmission, Recovery vs Deat... https://t.co/wemiTxCE4e 来自 @YouTube
MedCrams most recent update "Coronavirus Epidemic Update 9: Fecal-Oral Transmission, Recovery vs Death Rate" on YouTube https://t.co/RungXM4ZEA
Coronavirus Epidemic Update 9: Fecal-Oral Transmission, Recovery vs Deat... https://t.co/sRqyo46rPl via @YouTube
https://t.co/Y27xwhHDA3
Please see that ! https://t.co/c8otMWyjzz
Coronavirus Epidemic Update 9: Fecal-Oral Transmission, Recovery vs Deat... #coronavirus #CoronaVirusCanada https://t.co/jCy71zPiYs via @YouTube
"We are witnessing, and are in the middle of a human tragedy which is pretty scary to say the least. People are suffering. But there are some things we can do about this, education, and understanding..." Dr. Seheult MD #CoronaVirusCanada #coronavirus https://t.co/Kwn14jpLoV
Coronavirus Epidemic Update 9: Fecal-Oral Transmission, Recovery vs Deat... https://t.co/ZeI4MAwuJK via @YouTube
Medcram; #Coronavirus Epidemic Update 9: Fecal-Oral Transmission, Recovery vs Death Rate https://t.co/p6QHLFyGRx https://t.co/tk5hUXEUSU
@ai6yrham if you haven’t followed @MedCramVideos on #coronavirus I think you might find it informative. https://t.co/CCSA9Xbpkg
DOCTOR's Coronavirus Epidemic Update 9: Fecal-Oral Transmission, Recovery vs Deaths #CoronaVirus #CoronavirusEpidemic #Prepare https://t.co/oHXxPrw7dP via @YouTube
@ZurichTimes Recommends on YouTube: Coronavirus Epidemic Update 9: Fecal-Oral Transmission, Recovery vs Death Rate https://t.co/fRU4DHDHYa
This channel offers updated videos about the #coronavirus. I don't feel like going outside anymore. https://t.co/Jhon0F4K1U
@darksecretplace Solid show prep for you today. ~5.2 day incubation period for 2019nCoV is what the current data is showing. The before and after symptoms info is the real concern. MedCram update #9 https://t.co/ZSoBnibqFh
Coronavirus Epidemic Update 9: Fecal-Oral Transmission, Recovery vs Deat... https://t.co/EEhzYPYgsG #coronavirus #CoronavirusOutbreak #preventcoronavirus
Coronavirus Epidemic Update 9: Fecal-Oral Transmission, Recovery vs Deat... https://t.co/dl4dJGMTzt via @YouTube
Coronavirus Epidemic Update 9: Fecal-Oral Transmission, Recovery vs Death Rate https://t.co/nxhBZoKCFz via @YouTube
Coronavirus Epidemic Update 9: Fecal-Oral Transmission, Recovery vs Deat... https://t.co/Mpr1vQQaX9 via @YouTube @lookner
Coronavirus Epidemic Update 9: Fecal-Oral Transmission, Recovery vs Deat... https://t.co/0HjKdulYWF via @YouTube
Interesting and well explained Coronavirus Epidemic Update 9: Fecal-Oral Transmission, Recovery vs Deat... https://t.co/CuUaD6iCkk via @YouTube
Coronavirus Epidemic Update 9: Fecal-Oral Transmission, Recovery vs Deat... https://t.co/CuUaD6iCkk via @YouTube
Coronavirus Epidemic Update 9: Fecal-Oral Transmission, Recovery vs Deat... https://t.co/05B8bE4sQJ via @YouTube @lookner
Coronavirus Epidemic Update 9: Fecal-Oral Transmission, Recovery vs Deat... https://t.co/tDWd2QE2dv via @YouTube
Coronavirus Epidemic Update 9: Fecal-Oral Transmission, Recovery vs Deat... https://t.co/eeRwfGZJDg via @YouTube
Coronavirus Epidemic Update 9: Fecal-Oral Transmission, Recovery vs Deat... https://t.co/cy8n4R1iWZ via @YouTube
Coronavirus Epidemic Update 9: Fecal-Oral Transmission, Recovery vs Death Rate: https://t.co/N1qB0xL882 via @YouTube
Coronavirus Epidemic Update 9: Fecal-Oral Transmission, Recovery vs Death Rate MedCram - Medical Lectures Explained CLEARLY https://t.co/nIRWcDKV3r
org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa032867. Justin Granath ·
... 10.1056/NEJMoa032867. Lee N, Hui D, Wu A, Chan P, Cameron P, Joynt GM, Ahuja A, Yung MY, Leung CB, To KF, Lui SF, Szeto CC, Chung S, Sung JJ. A major ...
... 10.1056/NEJMoa032867 5. Timothy F. Booth et al., Detection of Airborne Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) Coronavirus and Environmental Contamination ...
... 10.1056/NEJMoa032867. Lee N, Hui D, Wu A, Chan P, Cameron P, Joynt GM, Ahuja A, Yung MY, Leung CB, To KF, Lui SF, Szeto CC, Chung S, Sung JJ. A major ...
... 10.1056/NEJMoa032867. Lee N, Hui D, Wu A, Chan P, Cameron P, Joynt GM, Ahuja A, Yung MY, Leung CB, To KF, Lui SF, Szeto CC, Chung S, Sung JJ. A major ...
... 10.1056/NEJMoa032867. Lee N, Hui D, Wu A, Chan P, Cameron P, Joynt GM, Ahuja A, Yung MY, Leung CB, To KF, Lui SF, Szeto CC, Chung S, Sung JJ. A major ...
org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa032867) (https://www.nejm. org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp048051) And when I say "particle" I don't mean the virus ...
Evidence of airborne transmission of the severe acute respiratory syndrome virus. N Engl J Med. (2004) 350:1731–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032867 ...
Evidence of airborne transmission of the severe acute respiratory syndrome virus. N Engl J Med. (2004) 350:1731–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032867 ...
Evidence of airborne transmission of the severe acute respiratory syndrome virus. N Engl J Med. (2004) 350:1731–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032867 ...
org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa032867) (https://www.nejm. org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp048051) And when I say "particle" I don't mean the virus ...
org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa032867) (https://www.nejm. org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp048051) And when I say "particle" I don't mean the virus ...
org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa032867) (https://www.nejm. org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp048051) And when I say "particle" I don't mean the virus ...
Evidence of airborne transmission of the severe acute respiratory syndrome virus. N Engl J Med. (2004) 350:1731–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032867 ...
org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa032867) (https://www.nejm. org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp048051) And when I say "particle" I don't mean the virus ...
... than 180 cases in Amoy Gardens apartment complex in Hong Kong in 2003: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa032867. [deleted]. • 4y ago • ...
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa032867. Here's a Canadian paper from 2005: "These data provide the first experimental ...
Evidence of airborne transmission of the severe acute respiratory syndrome virus. N Engl J Med. (2004) 350:1731–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032867 ...
Evidence of airborne transmission of the severe acute respiratory syndrome virus. N Engl J Med. (2004) 350:1731–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032867 ...
doi:10.1056/NEJMoa032867. 19. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Updated June 26 ...
Evidence of airborne transmission of the severe acute respiratory syndrome virus. N Engl J Med. (2004) 350:1731–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032867 ...
Evidence of airborne transmission of the severe acute respiratory syndrome virus. N Engl J Med. (2004) 350:1731–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032867 ...
Evidence of airborne transmission of the severe acute respiratory syndrome virus. N Engl J Med. (2004) 350:1731–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032867 ...
Evidence of airborne transmission of the severe acute respiratory syndrome virus. N Engl J Med. (2004) 350:1731–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032867 ...
org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa032867) (https://www.nejm. org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp048051) And when I say "particle" I don't mean the virus ...
org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa032867) (https://www.nejm. org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp048051) And when I say "particle" I don't mean the virus ...
Evidence of airborne transmission of the severe acute respiratory syndrome virus. N Engl J Med. (2004) 350:1731–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032867 ...
org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa032867) (https://www.nejm. org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp048051) And when I say "particle" I don't mean the virus ...
org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa032867) (https://www.nejm. org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp048051) And when I say "particle" I don't mean the virus ...
Evidence of airborne transmission of the severe acute respiratory syndrome virus. N Engl J Med. (2004) 350:1731–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032867 ...
org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa032867) (https://www.nejm. org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp048051) And when I say "particle" I don't mean the virus ...
doi:10.1056/NEJMoa032867 Medline. 4. Arian Eunjung Cha. 'Superspreading' events, triggered by people who may not even know they are infected ...
org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa032867) (https://www.nejm. org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp048051) And when I say "particle" I don't mean the virus ...
org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa032867) (https://www.nejm. org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp048051) And when I say "particle" I don't mean the virus ...
Med. 2004, DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa032867).
... ://www.nejm. org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa032867. pnas.org. Identifying airborne transmission as the dominant. 5 yrs. 1. Aileen Meston. Will Jones ...
doi :10.1056/NEJMoa032867. – Lidia Morawska, Donald K. Milton, «It is Time to Address Airborne Transmission of Covid-19», Clinical ...
org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa032867) (https://www.nejm. org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp048051) And when I say "particle" I don't mean the virus ...
org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa032867) (https://www.nejm. org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp048051) And when I say "particle" I don't mean the virus ...
Evidence of airborne transmission of the severe acute respiratory syndrome virus. N Engl J Med. (2004) 350:1731–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032867 ...
Die Viren könnten dabei eine Distanz von 60 Meter überwunden haben (NEJM 2004; DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa032867). Links. Beitrag in Clinical ...
org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa032867) (https://www.nejm. org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp048051) And when I say "particle" I don't mean the virus ...
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032867; Tang JW, Li Y, Eames I, et al. Factors involved in the aerosol transmission of infection and control of ...
org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa032867) (https://www.nejm. org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp048051) And when I say "particle" I don't mean the virus ...
Evidence of airborne transmission of the severe acute respiratory syndrome virus. N Engl J Med. (2004) 350:1731–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032867 ...
... 10.1056/NEJMoa032867) and that the new virus can [remain viable for hours](https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMc2004973) in tiny droplets ...
... 10.1056/NEJMoa032867. Lee N, Hui D, Wu A, Chan P, Cameron P, Joynt GM, Ahuja A, Yung MY, Leung CB, To KF, Lui SF, Szeto CC, Chung S, Sung JJ ...
Evidence of airborne transmission of the severe acute respiratory syndrome virus. N Engl J Med. (2004) 350:1731–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032867 ...
org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa032867) (https://www.nejm. org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp048051) And when I say "particle" I don't mean the virus ...
org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa032867) (https://www.nejm. org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp048051) And when I say "particle" I don't mean the virus ...
org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa032867) (https://www.nejm. org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp048051) And when I say "particle" I don't mean the virus ...
org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa032867) (https://www.nejm. org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp048051) And when I say "particle" I don't mean the virus ...
org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa032867) (https://www.nejm. org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp048051) And when I say "particle" I don't mean the virus ...
... cases in the neighbouring buildings as well, probably carried by the wind. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa032867 · DoodPare. • 6y ago.
org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa032867) (https://www.nejm. org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp048051) And when I say "particle" I don't mean the virus ...
org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa032867) (https://www.nejm. org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp048051) And when I say "particle" I don't mean the virus ...
org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa032867) (https://www.nejm. org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp048051) And when I say "particle" I don't mean the virus ...
org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa032867) (https://www.nejm. org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp048051) And when I say "particle" I don't mean the virus ...
org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa032867) (https://www.nejm. org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp048051) And when I say "particle" I don't mean the virus ...
org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa032867) (https://www.nejm. org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp048051) And when I say "particle" I don't mean the virus ...
Evidence of airborne transmission of the severe acute respiratory syndrome virus. N Engl J Med. (2004) 350:1731–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032867 ...
org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa032867) (https://www.nejm. org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp048051) And when I say "particle" I don't mean the virus ...
org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa032867) (https://www.nejm. org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp048051) And when I say "particle" I don't mean the virus ...
doi:10.1056/NEJMoa032867. Kim SH, Chang SY, Sung M, et al. Extensive Viable Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) Coronavirus Contamination ...
... use of computational fluid-dynamics modeling. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa032867. Upvote 27. Downvote Reply reply. Award
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa032867. Taking a sneeze as an example, most particles are large: around 70-100 micrometers. Some ...
... at www.greendrains.com Research: https://www.nejm. org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa032867. Justin Granath ·
Evidence of airborne transmission of the severe acute respiratory syndrome virus. N Engl J Med. (2004) 350:1731–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032867 ...