Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The discussions are highly engaged with scientific evidence, citing studies like the 2004 paper by O'Keefe and Cordain, along with references to hunter-gatherer populations and evolutionary biology, framing LDL levels of 50-70 mg/dL as optimal and natural. The tone ranges from supportive to slightly skeptical, emphasizing the importance of LDL management for cardiovascular health, and words like "proof," "evidence," and "optimal" convey the perceived significance of these findings.
Most discussions strongly support the publication's conclusion that optimal LDL levels are between 50-70 mg/dL and that lower is better for health.
Participants demonstrate high curiosity, discussing detailed research, historical perspectives, and implications for health and diet.
Many refer to scientific studies, classical research, and evolutionary biology, indicating deep involvement and analysis.
The discussions could influence perspectives on diet, lipid management, and medical guidelines, reflecting significant potential influence.
Friendly reminder to our #Carnivore and #keto friends that LDL-c levels in our ancestors were very very low. If you want to be truly ancestoral get your LDL-c down. https://t.co/54DyAPIkcv
https://t.co/Ls0Yo30zzJ https://t.co/c29XIShqSW
Loren Cordain (father of the Paleo diet) on Optimal LDL-C levels. https://t.co/Ls0Yo2IqlB
Optimal low-density lipoprotein is 50 to 70 mg/dl: Lower is better and physiologically normal - ScienceDirect From the father of the Paleo Diet - Loren Cordain https://t.co/w5e8BA0Hb0
@ScepticalDoctor @TyRBeal @TheVeganRD @MyNutritionSci @luke_spajic @waiterich @_HannahRitchie @JohnG_UK @drmatthewnagra @MattMadore576 @NutritionMadeS3 This is particularly surprising given they reference Loren Cordain's work but conveniently this piece of his out? https://t.co/Ls0Yo2IqlB
7. Y la próxima vez que te muestren este gráfico y te citen este paper del 2004 doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.03.046 Recordale que la aterosclerosis es mas compleja que bajar LDL y la realidad tiene otras aristas https://t.co/BDnR6Q5xQW
Optimal low-density lipoprotein levels are between 50 and 70 mg/dL, with lower levels in this range linked to better health outcomes. Maintaining LDL within this range reduces atherosclerosis risk without safety…
Finasteride, a medication for prostate issues and hair loss, delays atherosclerosis progression in mice and reduces plasma cholesterol levels in men. It decreases inflammation and influences liver function related to…
This video examines the evidence linking red meat consumption to colorectal cancer, discusses dietary myths, and reviews current international guidelines. It aims to clarify misconceptions about meat and health risks…
This video examines the effects of a low-carbohydrate high-fat diet on LDL cholesterol levels in healthy young women. The randomized controlled trial revealed significant increases in LDL cholesterol, raising concerns…
Optimal LDL levels are between 50 and 70 mg/dL, with lower levels linked to better health outcomes. Research shows that lowering LDL to around 70 mg/dL reduces atherosclerosis progression and heart disease risk…
The study investigated the impact of egg consumption on endothelial function, a key indicator of cardiovascular risk, in healthy adults. Results showed no significant difference between eggs and oats after 6 weeks…
Optimal low-density lipoprotein LDL levels are considered to be between 50 and 70 mg/dL, and lower levels within this range are associated with better health outcomes. Research indicates that lowering LDL to around 70…
Kevin Samuels died from a suspected heart attack, raising awareness about hidden heart disease. This video discusses his health history and the importance of understanding cardiovascular risks, even among those without…
@PurpledPill @grok @KritischePatri https://t.co/456FWSwvv5 Optimale LDL cholesterol voor het minimaliseren van hart- en vaatziekten. https://t.co/2wo779wb6X Deze meta analyse laat zien dat LDL cholesterol en de opbouw van atherosclerose letterlijk causaal aan elkaar verbonden zijn.
@SaulNutri Si, el LDL fisiológico es de alrededor de 40 mg/dl, nacemos con eso, estás confundiéndote con LDL normal…con LDL >25 los receptores LDL ya están saturados, con 40 ya cumple todas las funciones fisiológicas https://t.co/cXGPdyZkwL
RT @ScottAppliedSci: @SamaHoole Here’s a good, classic study if you’d like to follow up. Notice how ludicrously out of range our modern day…
@SamaHoole Here’s a good, classic study if you’d like to follow up. Notice how ludicrously out of range our modern day cholesterol levels are compared to conspecifics and closely related species. https://t.co/Xm88uN0VuU
@TylerDurne62894 @fiscaldofim E com razão. Na verdade, o nível fisiológico do LDL na nossa espécie é entre 50 e 70 mg/dL. https://t.co/Emc1jq6wXW
@Lpa_Doc @ApoDudz @Lpa_Doc can you comment on this paper? https://t.co/3v4sAhHBlm
RT @a_fisiolog57853: UN POCO DE PALEO, POR FAVOR. https://t.co/Vkua7lnkw5 https://t.co/ECC3fTO7CM
RT @a_fisiolog57853: UN POCO DE PALEO, POR FAVOR. https://t.co/Vkua7lnkw5 https://t.co/ECC3fTO7CM
UN POCO DE PALEO, POR FAVOR. https://t.co/Vkua7lnkw5 https://t.co/ECC3fTO7CM
@MasalaFry69 @underwire6783 @lipherps @DavidAYON @RadioFreeTom So again… tightly regulated… what’s an acceptable level in the serum…. Here’s a paper showing Hunter gatherer populations and mammals and their baseline ldl and total cholesterol https://t.co/zBRYcSXay1
@BenBikmanPhD Indeed, I was mistaken. My comment came from studies like this one: https://t.co/X5C9nXF92Q But clearly, Bayturan shows that plaque can still progress even at those supposedly optimal levels in high-risk patients although "only" in 1 out of 5
@BenBikmanPhD Indeed, I was mistaken. My comment came from studies like this one: https://t.co/X5C9nXF92Q But clearly, Bayturan shows that plaque can still progress even at those supposedly optimal levels in high-risk patients although "only" in 1 out of 5
@FloZoe99 @DoctorTro I’m talking about studies done on indigenous people who still don’t eat modern food. Just look at the low cholesterol levels these people have. You don’t get that on a keto/carnivore diet. https://t.co/VAJPHN3arH https://t.co/A7QwjXrR6e
@Pbogio @FloZoe99 @DoctorTro They have a high infant mortality but if they survive childhood they mostly live into their 70s some even into 80s. They mostly die from accidents, snake bites or infections. No CVDs. And very low blood lipids. (source: https://t.co/VAJPHN3arH) https://t.co/C1FKTgeYjx
@sf2000b @OSheaJW My guy this is not an opinion. After you have a heart attack, they treat your LDL to <70, even lower if you are CHD + diabetes. https://t.co/7feqxPRkTr
@grok @ThelastStyleb16 @MasalaFry69 @Special_Cactus Why is it that people with ldl of 50-70mg have the lowest rate of heart disease if there is only a weak association. https://t.co/gAzbGyG5UG
Optimal low-density lipoprotein is 50 to 70 mg/dl: Lower is better and physiologically normal - ScienceDirect https://t.co/H6s2TUmdrQ
@chatpotpompier @CARepublicrat The data suggests otherwise. https://t.co/5h2K5YWQBv https://t.co/JfJssZcih3
@CaryKelly11 You might want to look at event rates at the differing levels of LDL. https://t.co/xTEUvklYkL https://t.co/Av8PVnewCI
@NipseyHoussle LDL is most important but don’t let anyone tell you 200mg/dL is normal. In a society where heart disease is the leading cause of death, a normal cholesterol level leads to heart disease later in life. Optimal 200 is very bad and optimal is 50-70 https://t.co/ompI2o3xb0
@ElieJarrougeMD Caught you fucking lying. Optimal levels are around 50-70mg/dL and can be achieved with diet and lifestyle changes. https://t.co/ompI2o2Zls
@STOPHEATHERTIME https://t.co/ME5nlEAUzP.
@deportriggers @lavvspan @WORLDN0MAD @theproof I was hoping you might have the reference for that figure you showed. I’ve seen this paper with various mammal cholesterol levels but I’d never seen that figure you shared. https://t.co/86lcUfDtJA
@PikeCapo @Vegan1478 Le cholestérol alimentaire est lié à des risques de cancer + élevé, sinon oui rien à voir sauf une petite portion de la population pour qui ca joue Et pour rappel le taux optimal de LDL-C : https://t.co/shNXtTDkQp
@Mister01896517 @travis_demaria @MohammedAlo Western populations, yes. Not hunter-gatherer populations. https://t.co/BERnAAGOcj https://t.co/21naQ3NAgY
Cholesterol is not entirely responsible for atherosclerotic plaques but is part of the cascade that affects the arterial wall causing cardiovascular disease. Research data shows(https://t.co/xVNL58l3nC)atherosclerosis progression and coronary heart disease events are minimized
@JesslovesMJK Thoughts Jessica? https://t.co/tgaQew5AsR
@pnatarajanmd @Lpa_Doc https://t.co/qqnOKwxTw7
Sources: https://t.co/PleVg7mhxy https://t.co/pZOECsa7Qk https://t.co/5wEqewgHZe https://t.co/SPAy2oVFwr https://t.co/fW1GUzXpvt https://t.co/0K29D60YCE https://t.co/1M1pJTi1Jh
@carniyogi @FoodFirst_Ty If you're going to take the position that a behaviour is healthy because it's ancestral, then presumably you have to accept that low cholesterol is healthy, since hunter-gatherer populations generally have cholesterol in the 50-70 mg/dl range. https://t.co/NUFsfHRoeC
@Augman_1957 @ValerieAnne1970 Ever heard of survivorship bias? Too complicated for you. And while you talk about them, you may check their LDL-c levels. What are yours? Ever wondered why only those with low LDL-c among them survived to old age? Survivorship/selection bias
RT @MiocanDanijel: Wonder how the paleolithic perspective works with the most unpaleolithic levels of LDL-c? This people are slowly and ste…
Wonder how the paleolithic perspective works with the most unpaleolithic levels of LDL-c? This people are slowly and steadily killing themselves
@gosforthgal @vivaluvegan @A_Research_Guru https://t.co/gAzbGyG5UG cholesterol/LDL being lower is optimal for heart disease risk
@ChaosReign1066 @ScepticalDoctor But this is the paper by Loren Cordain. Paleo founder. https://t.co/54DyAPIkcv
And yet, carnivore zealots will claim that very high LDL-C is great thing to have. While the ancestors whose example they follow had LDL-C 3-4 times! lower than them. https://t.co/54DyAPIS23
@connerdelights @grantadever Most people have cholesterol levels higher than what is natural and optimal, so decreasing intake would get them closer to it, even more so for saturated fat yes https://t.co/qqnOKwxTw7
@_advg_ @Ankur_J_Bordolo @chiragbarjatyaa @Drlipid I can give you the evidence, whole night about the claims, see if your personal bias and beliefs are interfering with facts, please avoid it. As a public servant, we have to look at the facts rather than anecdotal evidence and beliefs. https://t.co/dtqdAFW8XY
@_advg_ @Ankur_J_Bordolo @chiragbarjatyaa @Drlipid Yes, we do have recommendations Lower LDL-C is better!! https://t.co/dtqdAFW8XY https://t.co/pmDVDat9UN
@wildgains Glad you brought it up. There is some interesting research on them. What do you think about it? https://t.co/54DyAPIkcv
@shelly_187 @nutrition_facts https://t.co/YpQzSVBoFW I thought the idea was to be like our ancestors?
Optimal low-density lipoprotein is 50 to 70 mg/dl: lower is better and physiologically normal https://t.co/6DTbYlQbzb
@LornaMa26788099 https://t.co/zojpsAmCbt
@WeiZhangAtmos https://t.co/zojpsAmCbt
RT @PavlicaDanijel: Friendly reminder to our #Carnivore and #keto friends that LDL-c levels in our ancestors were very very low. If you wan…
RT @PavlicaDanijel: Friendly reminder to our #Carnivore and #keto friends that LDL-c levels in our ancestors were very very low. If you wan…
RT @PavlicaDanijel: Friendly reminder to our #Carnivore and #keto friends that LDL-c levels in our ancestors were very very low. If you wan…
Friendly reminder to our #Carnivore and #keto friends that LDL-c levels in our ancestors were very very low. If you want to be truly ancestoral get your LDL-c down. https://t.co/54DyAPIkcv
@Josh95859922 @BrianDangeno @KenDBerryMD @American_Heart @DoctorTro @SBakerMD @jordanbpeterson @megynkelly @EddieTrunk @hubermanlab @prageru @ericmmatheny @MartinKulldorff @kardiyobey Ever heard of antagonistic pleiotropy, survivorship bias? Maybe the only ones who survived had genetically low LDL. This study was conducted by paleo and low carb proponents btw. There is no doubt they eat meat. That meat is very different to ribeyes. https://t.co/54DyAPIkcv
@LornaMa26788099 That is really good. I think 2 converts to just over this but not by much https://t.co/gAzbGyG5UG
@termites12345 @robertlufkinmd For the reference. LDL levels in hunter gatherers. https://t.co/54DyAPIkcv
@thelowcarb_rd @SentientBlobBob @DrNadolsky https://t.co/54DyAPIkcv I think both O’Keefee and Cordain are low carb proponents. Didn’t Loren “found” the Paleo diet?
@PeterFaberSP @mikeoniron @realDaveFeldman Peter- “Super low”, or “physiological”? https://t.co/tgaQew5AsR
@GoingParabolic ??? 200 LDL is... not good "The normal low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol range is 50 to 70 mg/dl for native hunter-gatherers, healthy human neonates, free-living primates, and other wild mammals (all of whom do not develop atherosclerosis)." https://t.co/wy8ISo4YG7).
@AeroValue @paselsab ref 1: https://t.co/m8ZgXGJNVA ref 2: Roberts WC. It's the cholesterol, stupid! Am J Cardiol. 2010 Nov 1;106(9):1364-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.09.022.
@CaryKelly11 Funny, bcs that piece of meat is almost purely protein. Might explain this https://t.co/54DyAPIkcv
@TheNutrivore https://t.co/54DyAPIkcv I was informed by a carnivore that this is vegan propaganda. Yeah, Loren Cordain is a vegan propagandist.
@PlantChompers @sciencebyjae That’s why we never see high LDL in real ancestoral dieters. https://t.co/54DyAPIkcv
RT @EddieRDMD: Journal of the American College of Cardiology: Low LDL-C levels decrease cardiovascular risk, mortality and improve longev…
Journal of the American College of Cardiology: Low LDL-C levels decrease cardiovascular risk, mortality and improve longevity. How to achieve that? ---> WFPBD https://t.co/Sux1yLwGha @drjkahn https://t.co/UZ2DKuXRsw
Optimal low-density lipoprotein is 50 to 70 mg/dl: lower is better and physiologically normal https://t.co/RGo4GkIdI0
RT @theproof: https://t.co/Ls0Yo30zzJ https://t.co/c29XIShqSW
https://t.co/Ls0Yo30zzJ https://t.co/c29XIShqSW
@StevenMBelknap @dewucare8 @sguyenet @SentientBlobBob @exfatloss @bigfatsurprise https://t.co/54DyAPIkcv Maybe bcs our ancestors didn’t eat fatty Frankenanimals and when they did they didn’t eat them every day plus they ate plenty of fiber?
@gAlecsyBrain I don't think meat-eating has much to do with it. Whether HGs eat a lot or little meat seems to have little impact on their lipids - they're low. https://t.co/NQZvjviL9h https://t.co/rnRr8ygM7f
@Scalesremoved @drcateshanahan @DiscoStew66 Between 50-70 ldl. https://t.co/NEpfnus47K
@Coloidesoxigeno @EscuelaFit Si te gusta Weston Andrew Valleau Price, conocerás a Loren Cordain: https://t.co/BY2b2kavTa
@Yo_soy_JulyR Aquí algunas referencias para consultar: https://t.co/Dk8AsmW6fk https://t.co/gcZxOkAPtm https://t.co/zrcgbrfgt0 https://t.co/L4d4u4H1kT https://t.co/qTo82NAl0w https://t.co/BY2b2ksF7i https://t.co/xZTN7ZXUvw Su tweet es un despropósito y si es por parte de un médico más.
@MikeKon00166475 @casa_roberts_tx @ifixhearts Ldl of 50-70 is ideal. Eating meat, especially in the amount most corpse addicts do, will never allow that..https://t.co/NEpfnus47K
@drcateshanahan Does the image in that presentation came from this article https://t.co/dDlj2Eom2E
@PaloSamo @DaleWil39870290 @RPuddick @drandyphung @ProfTimNoakes At a given level and in contexts where there is not famine and calorie deficits, yes. https://t.co/Ls0Yo2IqlB
@immer_mit_Rad @der_veganer https://t.co/6c7cxKEVBM
@kevinnbass Here's my hypothesis: ldl-c is highly variable if humans were evolved to have an average ldl-c of 25mg/dl we wouldn't have enough ldl-c 50% of the time, therefore we evolved to have a higher ldl-c, a normal ldl-c is between 50-70mg/dl https://t.co/t3SXaOAxKK
@Chaddadbod @ElieJarrougeMD https://t.co/77vtykzuIN).
@PKennedyeMD @NutritionMadeS3 The normal ldl-c is actually between 50-70mg/dl. https://t.co/t3SXaOAxKK If the normal ldl-c was 25mg/dl it would be too low 50% of the time. 50-70mg/dl gives enough wiggle room so that it's never too low. Just my hypothesis
RT @FrogHarmless: @Drlipid Is that even achievable without rare mutations or drugs? Pretty sure primitives were fine with 50-70 mg/dl, wh…
RT @FrogHarmless: @Drlipid Is that even achievable without rare mutations or drugs? Pretty sure primitives were fine with 50-70 mg/dl, wh…
@Drlipid Is that even achievable without rare mutations or drugs? Pretty sure primitives were fine with 50-70 mg/dl, which *is* achievable with just lifestyle. https://t.co/NQZvjvidjJ https://t.co/eLk3ZeUJra
@MaxJordan_N While statistically significant, diabetes association with statins is quite modest. Virtually no modern human has an optimal LDL-C & stands to benefit from additional LDL-C lowering https://t.co/qeaUb5Tn5Z https://t.co/esmzD5arqH
RT @ZahcM: I've been looking into this paper. Very good material for my upcoming blog posts
RT @ZahcM: I've been looking into this paper. Very good material for my upcoming blog posts
RT @ZahcM: I've been looking into this paper. Very good material for my upcoming blog posts
RT @ZahcM: I've been looking into this paper. Very good material for my upcoming blog posts
RT @ZahcM: I've been looking into this paper. Very good material for my upcoming blog posts
RT @ZahcM: I've been looking into this paper. Very good material for my upcoming blog posts
I've been looking into this paper. Very good material for my upcoming blog posts
Optimal low-density lipoprotein is 50 to 70 mg/dl (based on some hunter-gatherers) https://t.co/EFNNRPU99e
@ifixhearts Kind of depends on definitions. I've seen speculation that true normal LDL for humans is considerably lower than what is considered "normal" (ie. not high) for contemporaries. https://t.co/NQZvjvidjJ https://t.co/TAem4IzhvN
@Mespejel29 @Eli23541052 @kevinstock12 Even the father of the Paleo diet Loren Cordain accepts this https://t.co/Ls0Yo30zzJ
@Mespejel29 @theproof @kevinstock12 https://t.co/ElzxvmyACg.
@Vallone9Anna @DavidDonaldElk1 @CaryKelly11 https://t.co/ElzxvmyACg.
@sendit07109368 @Sundquist_ @esr71 @BernardoKastrup @CarnivoreMD if anything, this study proves my point, which I presented earlier. Let me present it again: https://t.co/nhtd0qgEVB
@zanesmith331 @SBakerMD Quite the contrary actually… https://t.co/SLi2VfPto0 https://t.co/b0nSaufOeR https://t.co/yDdh4uvA42 https://t.co/LEUJpxnMEq https://t.co/M31sDhBRqy
@SanDiegoJoey @vegansince96 @ChampCaI I am taking about LDL. So even thinking that we measure some variables and in the healthy range, we can be wrong. This is so complex (about mechanisms). And no important usually. So, is better to base in studies where compare people i'm their whole https://t.co/BIz1hZB7vF
RT @Plant_proof: @ScepticalDoctor @TyRBeal @TheVeganRD @MyNutritionSci @luke_spajic @waiterich @_HannahRitchie @JohnG_UK @drmatthewnagra @M…
@ScepticalDoctor @TyRBeal @TheVeganRD @MyNutritionSci @luke_spajic @waiterich @_HannahRitchie @JohnG_UK @drmatthewnagra @MattMadore576 @NutritionMadeS3 This is particularly surprising given they reference Loren Cordain's work but conveniently this piece of his out? https://t.co/Ls0Yo2IqlB
@5c59a6b6596c4e6 @Plant_proof https://t.co/jwOJ0BFFwu found it
@twitevit You know more than the fathers of #lchf like Loren Cordain. https://t.co/Ls0Yo2IqlB
@swede_irish @theArdenHart @DishonestApe @spicer_zack @Matt_Dillahunty @StudentDocBen Lower than Normal is better: https://t.co/3MERCA4Gje
@simondankel @DiscoStew66 https://t.co/Ls0Yo2IqlB
RT @Plant_proof: Loren Cordain (father of the Paleo diet) on Optimal LDL-C levels. https://t.co/Ls0Yo2IqlB
RT @Plant_proof: Loren Cordain (father of the Paleo diet) on Optimal LDL-C levels. https://t.co/Ls0Yo2IqlB
RT @Plant_proof: Loren Cordain (father of the Paleo diet) on Optimal LDL-C levels. https://t.co/Ls0Yo2IqlB
RT @Plant_proof: Loren Cordain (father of the Paleo diet) on Optimal LDL-C levels. https://t.co/Ls0Yo2IqlB
RT @Plant_proof: Loren Cordain (father of the Paleo diet) on Optimal LDL-C levels. https://t.co/Ls0Yo2IqlB
RT @Plant_proof: Loren Cordain (father of the Paleo diet) on Optimal LDL-C levels. https://t.co/Ls0Yo2IqlB
Loren Cordain (father of the Paleo diet) on Optimal LDL-C levels. https://t.co/Ls0Yo2IqlB
Optimal low-density lipoprotein is 50 to 70 mg/dl: Lower is better and physiologically normal - ScienceDirect https://t.co/SvjmGRPkPw
@nicknorwitz This, perhaps? It's a reasonable (but not ironclad) inference from hunter-gatherer data. https://t.co/fKY1rAgx2e https://t.co/c9gUn2tIBo
@MarcBra04865806 @MennoHenselmans https://t.co/Ls0Yo2IqlB
@MarcBra04865806 @Plant_proof @MennoHenselmans https://t.co/tFdmNlSk01 https://t.co/t7mHii73kL
@StefZonnenberg I am not aware of any evidence to suggest LDL at this level isn’t anything but optimal. If there has please share it. https://t.co/Ls0Yo301Kb
Optimal low-density lipoprotein is 50 to 70 mg/dl: Lower is better and physiologically normal - ScienceDirect From the father of the Paleo Diet - Loren Cordain https://t.co/w5e8BA0Hb0
Optimal low-density lipoprotein is 50 to 70 mg/dl: Lower is better and physiologically normal - ScienceDirect From the father of the Paleo Diet - Loren Cordain
@yasubro we know erectile dysfunction is linked to cardiovascular health (https://t.co/9IPEnApjwr) and we know dietary cholesterol raises LDL-C (https://t.co/sm7wRSayqq) damaging cardiovascular health and increasing risk of ED developing. dietary veganism would result in the opposite.
@SFZoe014 @VeganRecovering @HariSel45215838 If you can link me to where Cordain’s stance now is that cholesterol doesn’t matter or that we shouldn’t eat saturated fat in moderation I’d like to see it. He published a paper in 2004 arguing LDL < 70 was optimal https://t.co/GYGz97xQwn
@sh_akers https://t.co/0SEkYDLZBk
@Fabiensapiens @JoliesRousses @thierrysouccar Et certaines études d'intervention sont critiquables : comparaison avec saucisse+fromage (lol) https://t.co/muYTNKKM8y Intervention sur sujets avec cholesterol ++ (effet plateau cf. supra) https://t.co/NiB2gXJosu (optimal levels: https://t.co/Rp40xhiapt) A suivre
@bubblehslol @nmplol you're missing a step there mate. High LDL cholesterol is STRONGLY correlated with heart disease: https://t.co/wUHEwoxjyy https://t.co/YOwEZxG2KG https://t.co/hL6aZKjz3u just because saturated fat diets don't always lead to high cholesterol, high cholesterol often leads to HD
@AviBittMD @BioLayne Or this: "Randomized trial data suggest atherosclerosis progression and coronary heart disease events are minimized when LDL is lowered to <70 mg/dl. No major safety concerns have surfaced in studies that lowered LDL to this range of 50 to 70 mg/dl." https://t.co/0uaQoqQKaN
@celticcolin @BioLayne "Randomized trial data suggest atherosclerosis progression and coronary heart disease events are minimized when LDL is lowered to <70 mg/dl. No major safety concerns have surfaced in studies that lowered LDL to this range of 50 to 70 mg/dl." https://t.co/0uaQoqQKaN
Statin pusher. Conflict of interests. Not really good
@MilesHighLife @Drlipid O'Keefe, J. H., Cordain, L., Harris, W. H., Moe, R. M., & Vogel, R. (2004). Optimal low-density lipoprotein is 50 to 70 mg/dl: lower is better and physiologically normal. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 43(11), 2142-2146. https://t.co/Uysa9rNWag
Optimal low-density lipoprotein is 50 to 70 mg/dl: Lower is better and physiologically normal - ScienceDirect #cardiology #heartdisease https://t.co/wXmZlGU3wh
@POhukainen @FatEmperor @DaveKeto Optimal low-density lipoprotein is 50 to 70 mg/dl:Lower is better and physiologically normal James H O'KeefeJr MD*LorenCordain PhD†William HHarrisPhD*Richard MMoeMD, PhD*RobertVogelMD‡ Journal of the American College of Cardiology Volume 43, Issue 11, 2 June 2004, 2142-2146
@SABOURETCardio @khurramn1 @AtulPathak31 @pnatarajanmd @ErinMichos @rblument1 @skathire @dramitkhera @DrMarthaGulati @drpablocorral @HeartOTXHeartMD @RonBlankstein @DrMichaelShapir Among remaining hunter-gatherer subjects, LDL levels stand between 50-70 mg/dl according to the publication below: https://t.co/V75bwqDuZa But rare (and healthy) individuals w/LOF mutations in PCSK9 gene display LDL levels around 15 mg/dl see here
7. Y la próxima vez que te muestren este gráfico y te citen este paper del 2004 doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.03.046 Recordale que la aterosclerosis es mas compleja que bajar LDL y la realidad tiene otras aristas https://t.co/BDnR6Q5xQW
ES
EF
LB
TB