Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
Comments highlight core ideas from the publication, such as variability in creatine response related to initial muscle profile and endogenous production, exemplified by comments noting different responder tiers and potential cognitive benefits; the tone suggests curiosity and recognition of personalized responses, with phrases like 'likely due to' and 'probably works both ways,' indicating analytical engagement without full consensus.
Most comments recognize the article's findings regarding variability in response to creatine, with some posts noting the role of endogenous production.
Discussions demonstrate high curiosity, especially about individual differences and potential cognitive benefits.
Posts reflect moderate engagement by referencing specific concepts like responders and nonresponders and discussing their causes.
The conversations acknowledge the study’s relevance, especially concerning personalized nutrition and potential cognitive effects, though some uncertainty remains.
If you’re interested in the exact research studies mentioned above - (1) https://t.co/0Q5JTyB0RJ https://t.co/f07xM2ICwO (2) https://t.co/iUhQtJVqes (3) https://t.co/arzAE8L6UA (4) https://t.co/1c1Nuw1JM5 (5) https://t.co/Uj8uGSkbb3
@TreadAthletics 1/4 people apparently. You maybe be able to get cognitive and nootropic benefits. https://t.co/fHzKElnvZh
@_sheyworth https://t.co/F5B9b5SeZn Some people respond better than others - non-responders have no response due to naturally high levels of creatine due to higher endogenous production of it. Probably works both ways.
@vahramovich @giorgallidis Three Tiers of responders likely due to differing endogenous production of creatine in the body https://t.co/F5B9b5SeZn
Creatine is a small peptide that exists naturally in the body. This video explores what happens to your body when you take creatine for 30 days, focusing on its effects on muscle and brain energy production…
Supplements like EAAs, BCAAs, protein powder, or creatine are heavily promoted by the supplement industry. This video examines their actual effectiveness and whether these supplements are worth using, based on…
2) D. G. Syrotuik et al. ´Acute creatine monohydrate supplementation: a descriptive physiological profile of responders vs. nonresponders`. J Strength Cold Res. 2004, pp. 610-7
@vahramovich @giorgallidis Three Tiers of responders likely due to differing endogenous production of creatine in the body https://t.co/F5B9b5SeZn
@_sheyworth https://t.co/F5B9b5SeZn Some people respond better than others - non-responders have no response due to naturally high levels of creatine due to higher endogenous production of it. Probably works both ways.
@TreadAthletics 1/4 people apparently. You maybe be able to get cognitive and nootropic benefits. https://t.co/fHzKElnvZh
If you’re interested in the exact research studies mentioned above - (1) https://t.co/0Q5JTyB0RJ https://t.co/f07xM2ICwO (2) https://t.co/iUhQtJVqes (3) https://t.co/arzAE8L6UA (4) https://t.co/1c1Nuw1JM5 (5) https://t.co/Uj8uGSkbb3
10.1519/12392.1 derly apolipoprotein E e4 carriers. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 45. Brosnan ME, Brosnan JT. The role of dietary creatine. Amino Acids. 2003 ...
doi: 10.1519/12392.1. PMID: 15320650. May be an image of 1 person and text that says 'Kreatyna · May be an image of 1 person and text that says 'co ...
J Strength Cond Res 18:610–617. tation, and bone health in ovariectomized rats. Osteoporos Int doi:10.1519/12392.1 26(4):1395–1404 Syrotuik DG, Bell GJ ...
... of responders vs. nonresponders. J Strength Cond Res. 2004 Aug;18(3):610-7. doi: 10.1519/12392.1. PMID: 15320650.".
doi: 10.1519/12392.1 [doi]. 17. Safdar A, Yardley NJ, Snow R, Melov S, Tarnopolsky MA. Global and targeted gene expression and protein ...
JE
CC
Y
D