Discussions reflect a cautious skepticism about the article's conclusions, such as one user noting that 'most cited work says no mothers died,' questioning the safety claims. Others challenge the interpretation of evidence, emphasizing the importance of the rights of the unborn or referencing studies that support the safety of home births, showing a balance of scientific skepticism and ethical considerations. The tone is analytical but also somewhat contentious, illustrating a community that is critically engaging with the information without reaching a strong consensus.
AgreementNeither agree nor disagree
The discussions show mixed opinions, with some users disputing claims about the safety of home births and others referencing evidence and previous studies, but no strong consensus emerges.
InterestModerate interest
Participants are somewhat engaged with the topic, mainly questioning the validity of claims and referencing related research, which indicates a moderate level of curiosity or concern.
EngagementModerate engagement
There is a basic level of engagement through referencing data and challenging assertions, but few delve deeply into analysis or broader implications.
ImpactModerate impact
The conversations could influence perspectives on home birth safety but seem limited in scope, with no indication of widespread behavioral change or policy impact.
Abstract in brief
This study examined the safety of planned home births attended by certified professional midwives in North America, including the US and Canada, focusing on low-risk pregnancies.
Results showed that most women (about 12%) transferred to hospital care during labor, but those who remained at home experienced lower rates of medical interventions like epidurals, episiotomies, and cesareans, with neonatal and maternal outcomes comparable to hospital births.
Overall, the findings suggest that with proper certification and selection of low-risk pregnancies, planned home births can be a safe alternative to hospital births, with similar mortality rates and fewer medical interventions.
@llueve_221 Vos sabés bien que "te podés morir desangrado" no es evidencia científica. No me pidas que te refute eso porque se me va a llenar de boludos que no comprenden la refutación.
https://t.co/ZATaUUTGZX
Mar 10, 2023 · 2 likes · 14,262 followersView post →
LP
Ludwig von Pato
@22xTJuan · X
@SagazLuna @Dr_GaIIardo El que te dijo eso te mintió: el no-nacido sí tiene derechos. Lo que no veo es que un parto domiciliario los viole.
https://t.co/ZATaUUTGZX
Mar 10, 2023 · 1 like · 14,262 followersView post →
LP
Ludwig von Pato
@22xTJuan · X
@locasulfurica @SagazLuna @Dr_GaIIardo 1. No, no se resume a eso porque hay evidencia de que las chances de supervivencia no cambian entre ambas formas de parto https://t.co/ZATaUUTGZX
2. Si se resumiera a una cuestión de valores, también hay que demostrar que otros valores están "tan mal". Nadie lo hizo aún.
Mar 10, 2023 · 1 like · 14,262 followersView post →
LP
Ludwig von Pato
@22xTJuan · X
@debianloco Como intuición, lo que decís me parece razonable. El problema es que los trabajos más citados al respecto no te dan taaanto la razón. https://t.co/ZATaUUTGZX https://t.co/77SnDDEiSl
Mar 10, 2023 · 1 like · 14,262 followersView post →
This video discusses the safety of planned home births attended by certified professional midwives, highlighting lower intervention rates and comparable outcomes to hospital births for low-risk pregnancies, emphasizing…
I’ve been in birth education for a while and I’m STILL shocked by the many myths going around about unmedicated birth. This video breaks down the top natural birth myths and discusses what is actually true about going…
@llueve_221 Vos sabés bien que "te podés morir desangrado" no es evidencia científica. No me pidas que te refute eso porque se me va a llenar de boludos que no comprenden la refutación.
https://t.co/ZATaUUTGZX
Mar 10, 2023 · 2 likes · 14,262 followersView post →
LP
Ludwig von Pato
@22xTJuan · X
@locasulfurica @SagazLuna @Dr_GaIIardo 1. No, no se resume a eso porque hay evidencia de que las chances de supervivencia no cambian entre ambas formas de parto https://t.co/ZATaUUTGZX
2. Si se resumiera a una cuestión de valores, también hay que demostrar que otros valores están "tan mal". Nadie lo hizo aún.
Mar 10, 2023 · 1 like · 14,262 followersView post →
LP
Ludwig von Pato
@22xTJuan · X
@Dr_GaIIardo @locasulfurica @SagazLuna ¡Tirame vos el número que a vos te convenza! Pero dame el dato, no me digas que el dato existe sin proveerlo.
El trabajo más citado sobre el tema dice "no mothers died"
https://t.co/ZATaUUTGZX
@SagazLuna @Dr_GaIIardo El que te dijo eso te mintió: el no-nacido sí tiene derechos. Lo que no veo es que un parto domiciliario los viole.
https://t.co/ZATaUUTGZX
Mar 10, 2023 · 1 like · 14,262 followersView post →
LP
Ludwig von Pato
@22xTJuan · X
@debianloco Como intuición, lo que decís me parece razonable. El problema es que los trabajos más citados al respecto no te dan taaanto la razón. https://t.co/ZATaUUTGZX https://t.co/77SnDDEiSl
Mar 10, 2023 · 1 like · 14,262 followersView post →
N
Childbirth in pleasure and ecstasy: a fountain of hormones and ...
News
BMJ, 330(7505), 1416-1422. doi: 10.1136^11^.330.7505.1416. Kavanagh, J., Kell, A. J., & Thomas, J. (2005). Breast stimulation for cervical ripening and ...
Family therapy: doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7505.1416. A Systemic Integration (5th Ed.). Boston: Allyn Doron, G., Moulding, R., Kyrious, M., Nedeljkovic, ve Bacon ...
10 Referencia Bibliografica | PDF | Obstetrics | Childbirth
News
with certified professional midwives: large prospective study in North Amrica. BMJ., 330:1416, 18 jun. 2005. doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7505.1416. JOHNSTONE, F.D. ...
Maternal and Newborn Outcomes Following Waterbirth: The ...
News
BMJ. 2005;330(7505):1416. doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7505.1416. 39.Harper B. Waterbirth International. Available at: http://www. waterbirth.org/. Accessed August ...