Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The discussions reflect a keen interest in the scientific processes of peptide formation and abiogenesis, with examples like references to self-sustaining RNA enzymes and condensation chemistry highlighting active exploration. The tone combines supportive scientific commentary with dismissals of religious bias, showing both engagement and impact in promoting scientific understanding.
Most discussions express support or acknowledgment of the scientific explanations related to prebiotic peptide formation, with some dismissing alternative religious narratives.
Participants show high curiosity, referencing videos, scientific concepts, and debating the chemistry, indicating strong engagement with the topic.
Several comments delve into detailed explanations, calling others to watch videos or read articles, demonstrating active participation.
The conversations revolve around foundational questions of life's origins, with some users emphasizing the importance of scientific models over religious claims, indicating moderate influence on understanding these concepts.
@NotEvolution1 Sigh… https://t.co/u8vCWr57Db
Since we’re reechoing creationist arguments, & trying to found them in “science” here’s some counter arguments to them: https://t.co/WuvuyOARrs https://t.co/GZ6D3XNdyi https://t.co/35Kt3fifcJ https://t.co/7IHYKCLI8g
@SDAFS56788141 @WComing78932759 @joeandthegiant @AgainstAtheismX No, you’re blinded by religious bias and listen to religious charlatans like Tour who lie about the science. Self sustained RNA replication: https://t.co/kNmprx7Zud Condensation of amino acids: https://t.co/jTwdsE92fz RNA linkage heterogeneity: https://t.co/mr9kKt119c
@CorrrEL @WasIRude @Norse_Chieftain @Admiraldrake8 @gangestrog @creation247 No, you didn’t, you don’t have a great grasp on this material. Proteins are not only produced at the direction of DNA, RNA can do it as well through translation. Again, start here, and research on your own, but don’t be disingenuous. Enjoy! https://t.co/g8wKXF76XH
@TwBookClub https://t.co/gdkJ2szTf0
@TARSRel0aded @creation247 Abiogenesis is life from non-life. You said that "remains unexplained". https://t.co/XXPaX1tzo3
Last year I made a video about James Tour, a chemist and creationist opposing origin of life studies. In Part 2, I address his false claims about prebiotic synthesis progress and misrepresentations about cellular…
We explore the scientific research behind the origin of life from nonliving matter, focusing on amino acid peptide formation through sulfur IV oxidation. This process provides a plausible pathway for prebiotic peptide…
@VeritasAnchor @MrDrGiggleTouch @bateperson @NotEvolution1 Yes, it's better because you ditched the lies. You want the pathway from non life to life? Here you go: https://t.co/3PwPk817sS
@Tom_in_SFCA @Dead_to_Sin @Zorpheous @RFupdates And you can compare with a more updated version here: https://t.co/25eHqpbh4Y
@SDAFS56788141 @WComing78932759 @joeandthegiant @AgainstAtheismX No, you’re blinded by religious bias and listen to religious charlatans like Tour who lie about the science. Self sustained RNA replication: https://t.co/kNmprx7Zud Condensation of amino acids: https://t.co/jTwdsE92fz RNA linkage heterogeneity: https://t.co/mr9kKt119c
@SDAFS56788141 @Chasepointer01 @DrBeakRocks @gunsnrosesgirl3 Start with self sustaining RNA enzymes. Then the condensation of amino acids in water. Then RNA linkage. https://t.co/kNmprx8xjL https://t.co/jTwdsE9A57 https://t.co/mr9kKt1yYK
@RAdams87174368 @Askwhyisit https://t.co/LuPapUzx4a
@comm1ek1ller @NotEvolution1 No, it's actually very complicated organic chemistry. ProfessorDaveExplains has a video on it that's relavent to creationism. https://t.co/wvkAsKgmyj
@GARFIELDASMITH @Damien_Eternal @Lilith_Atheist https://t.co/exp4UpFv50 https://t.co/f5j9KBeZs3 https://t.co/hAobeWVRMI https://t.co/DAahdUMvsK
@TwBookClub https://t.co/gdkJ2szTf0
@lonna_camacho @Leigh252425 @NotEvolution1 https://t.co/xaImX167O8
@DivinelyDesined It CAN though. Your premise is faulty. https://t.co/ydy3hWpU7K
RT @DanteB35353: @NotEvolution1 Sigh… https://t.co/u8vCWr57Db
@NotEvolution1 Sigh… https://t.co/u8vCWr57Db
@Pastor_Gabe Sigh… For once in your life, please read a book. Or watch this at least. https://t.co/2PzDRtgvHc
@ShengDynasty @ArkEncounter No one said that it all came from a single molecule. No scientist worth his salt has EVER claimed that. Nor does anyone claim that life on earth came from nothing. Here’s a video explaining Abiogenesis if you’re unfamiliar with the concept. https://t.co/A6aY5tPSJP
@CorrrEL @WasIRude @Norse_Chieftain @Admiraldrake8 @gangestrog @creation247 No, you didn’t, you don’t have a great grasp on this material. Proteins are not only produced at the direction of DNA, RNA can do it as well through translation. Again, start here, and research on your own, but don’t be disingenuous. Enjoy! https://t.co/g8wKXF76XH
@SDAFS56788141 @1cebirdd @AiG This source goes into more depth and isn't limited by a character count From about 10:55 onwards https://t.co/L1hZwS5cva
@Eutychus411 @autocorrect2_0 Yes you literally can. You asserting something doesn’t make it true. I’m not claiming to be the “pinnacle of knowledge,” I’m pointing out that you haven’t actually done the work or you wouldn’t be saying that. https://t.co/ckOwRflBmr
@jrc99us @darwintojesus Anyway you didn’t put in the effort to actually discuss with me so instead of debunking your videos in tweet form I’ll link you two videos of my own: Abiogenesis: (you also could have read a bio article) https://t.co/b8AGhSVTku Fine tuning: https://t.co/bnWFaDePAl
https://t.co/N5Wq7lAyJC
@handsomestdwarf @LarsTheBadMan @darwintojesus If you’re genuinely curious, start with this video and go from there. Let me know what you think. https://t.co/RAqQjHnJp7
@Obiliciouss @whitekiwigunman @DLgodlessbitch No, you're skipping multiple steps. Intentionally. You are demonstrating you dishonesty. Heres some short videos on how it happened; https://t.co/y5FFQgLsCo https://t.co/qerTFtx9mm Educate yourself instead of staying deliberately ignorant.
Since we’re reechoing creationist arguments, & trying to found them in “science” here’s some counter arguments to them: https://t.co/WuvuyOARrs https://t.co/GZ6D3XNdyi https://t.co/35Kt3fifcJ https://t.co/7IHYKCLI8g
@Obiliciouss @whitekiwigunman @DLgodlessbitch Heck, here's a short video on the topic. https://t.co/qerTFtx9mm
@TARSRel0aded @creation247 Abiogenesis is life from non-life. You said that "remains unexplained". https://t.co/XXPaX1tzo3
@creationnews https://t.co/eAqu8sDz9v
This is very cool. In a few minutes I learned a ton about abiogenesis. https://t.co/6XlJRjgk7i
The Definitive Guide to Debunking Creationists Part 2: Abiogenesis https://t.co/9Ru7kL37aK via @YouTube
The Definitive Guide to Debunking Creationists Part 2: Abiogenesis https://t.co/utpVt2kxge via @YouTube
The Definitive Guide to Debunking Creationists Part 2: Abiogenesis https://t.co/EOZroNyJ6J via @YouTube Disagree with This
@1pckt @badgervindaloo @CoercriSeareach @SonyaSeigel @horusrage @laughchem @_BENEDIBRAVA_ @TertiusIV @Alliste35661241 @globalist13903 @WondersNorbit @tk_the_kitsune @Wolfpak561 @Chortling_Man @SecularSandwich @JustinCPorter @StillDizzy2 @A_Damned_smith @OnkelFester @IMudlet @PraiseHisName50 @zypisfy @MDH_UAR @peter_telecom @Baphomet555666 @RealAnonDouche @ZKomala @RossGilroy @Cern_lXXl @EdwardMKennedy2 @TakeThatDarwin @LeannEAF @Simple_Shaman @BlueDragonsFang @SBuddie1877 @Superior2Logic @MsCredentials @zapher134 @kester_lowers @MucusMucous @GodflyThe @EricBonner31 @JLee2027 @Quin4Trump @Tiffany_Stuff @waragoodwarfare @willsworldview @tklforgiven @hauxton @KaasKeizer https://t.co/iRxxprOptZ
... 10.1007/s11084-006-9012-y Testing ideas in prebiotic analogue conditions: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1729/11/2/134 Szostak RNA Linkage Heterogeneity: https ...
JA
C
P心