Overall, the discussions reflect a recognition of the study's findings, with mentions of key terms like 'abdominal bracing' and references to reputable researchers like Stuart McGill, showing that users are engaging with the scientific context and considering its implications for back stability practices.
AgreementModerate agreement
Most discussions support the findings that bracing is more effective for lumbar stability, aligning with the research results.
InterestModerate interest
The social discussions show moderate interest, with participants referencing specific methods like 'abdominal bracing' and engaging with detailed research references.
EngagementModerate engagement
Posts reference authoritative sources such as Stuart McGill and include links to further resources, indicating a moderate level of in-depth engagement.
ImpactModerate impact
People recognize the significance of the study, mentioning its importance for back health and stability exercises, hinting at some influence on practice and understanding.
Abstract in brief
The study compares two abdominal activation strategies—hollowing and bracing—to determine which better stabilizes the lumbar spine, using measurements of stability and compression during different loading conditions.
Results showed that bracing improved lumbar stability more significantly than hollowing, with a 32% increase in stability and a 15% rise in lumbar compression, while hollowing provides minimal mechanical stability benefits.
The simulation indicated that activating only the transversus abdominis contributes little to stability and does not reduce lumbar compression effectively, suggesting that bracing techniques are more beneficial for lumbar support than hollowing or isolated muscle activation.]
Dec 26, 2021 · 293 likes · 31 shares · 2,725 followersView post →
JY
Jeff Young
@JYKines · X
@SeanGTGibbons @PhysioMeScience It's not my perspective. It's McGill's (and other's) research. Just look up "abdominal bracing" and "hollowing" research.
This is one study of many: https://t.co/AjJ6WuXNnt
This study compares hollowing and bracing abdominal activation techniques to determine which better stabilizes the lumbar spine and reduces compression, finding bracing to be more effective for lumbar stability.
This video demonstrates back strengthening and stability exercises such as BirdDog, CatCamel, plank, and McGill curl up, showing how moving through these activities can help improve spinal health. Research indicates…
Dec 26, 2021 · 293 likes · 31 shares · 2,725 followersView post →
JY
Jeff Young
@JYKines · X
@SeanGTGibbons @PhysioMeScience It's not my perspective. It's McGill's (and other's) research. Just look up "abdominal bracing" and "hollowing" research.
This is one study of many: https://t.co/AjJ6WuXNnt
Canadian Society For Exercise Physiology Position Stand The Use ...
News
doi:10.1016/j.apmr. 2006.10.014. PMID:17207676. ever, the characteristics of a given sport may necessitate rep- Hamlyn, N., Behm, D.G., and Young, W.B. 2007 ...
Hollowing Vs Bracing PDF | PDF | Vertebra | Abdomen
News
doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2006.10.014 stabilization exercises are effective for patients with LBP. Arch Phys Med Rehabil Vol 88, January 2007. ABDOMINAL ACTIVATION ...
How About Us? An Allegory of Person With Disability Learners in ...
News
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2006.10.014. Hayes, A. M., & Bulat, J. (2017). Disabilities inclusive education systems and policies guide for low-and middle ...
doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2008.11.004. Hodges, P. W., Pengel, L. H. M., Herbert ... 2006.10.014 PMID:17207676 395–414. doi:10.1016/0021-9290(92)90259-4. PMID ...