Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The posts reflect a cautiously interested attitude, with comments like 'of interest but not showing improvements' highlighting analytical engagement, but overall, there is no strong agreement or sense of urgency about the article's findings, as evidenced by the moderate scores for curiosity and engagement.
The posts show mixed opinions, with some acknowledging the relevance of the paper but not fully endorsing its conclusions.
Discussions indicate a modest level of curiosity, especially around the nuances of the research, but not overwhelming enthusiasm.
Posts mention specific aspects like 'hard endpoints' and reference relevant papers, demonstrating some analytical engagement.
The discussions suggest limited perceived impact, as users note the absence of clear improvements despite interest.
@angryhacademic @kevinnbass Some relevant papers: https://t.co/QstGdxUJsz https://t.co/Xhfw4de5p1. Also of interest but not showing improvements of 'hard endpoints': https://t.co/EHM1cU6k6W https://t.co/17WFaV4X3a
Discover the evidence-based optimal vitamin D dose that may help improve cancer survival rates. A systematic review indicates that long-term high doses (3200-4000 IU daily) may increase risks such as hypercalcemia and…
@angryhacademic @kevinnbass Some relevant papers: https://t.co/QstGdxUJsz https://t.co/Xhfw4de5p1. Also of interest but not showing improvements of 'hard endpoints': https://t.co/EHM1cU6k6W https://t.co/17WFaV4X3a
AP