Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
Many discussions support the idea that people may not be fully aware of what truly influences their romantic preferences, with comments emphasizing real-world observations, references to foundational studies, and methodological critiques. The tone varies from analytical to casual, reflecting both academic interest and personal interpretation, which underscores a nuanced engagement with the research’s relevance and limitations.
Most comments acknowledge the research findings, with some suggesting that traditional views on physical attraction are exaggerated or misleading.
Discussion of social and psychological aspects of mate preferences indicates high curiosity and engagement with the topic.
Posts analyze the article’s implications, cite related studies, and debate methodological aspects, showing deep involvement.
The conversations highlight how the research questions perceptions of attraction and have potential implications for understanding human relationships, though the impact on everyday behavior remains moderate.
The most popular answer here (C) seems just wrong (see link), as does (A). And we don't seem to mind men trying hard in many other ways. I'd guess this is just an arbitrary historical thing; could have been opposite. https://t.co/c4CFaB1QvD https://t.co/fO186Uvce1
@_il_rossonero @The_Last_Gasp @Il_Basato_ (3 su 3) Gli uomini che mostrano questi tratti risultano più attraenti per le done. [2] Fonti: [1]"Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: Do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner?" [2]"Sex Differences in Human Mate Preferences"
@koi_n0_yokan Плюс есть исследование, согласно которому, если человек начинает отношения с кем-то, кто незначительно не соответствует его идеалу, он склонен подгонять идеал под партнера, «я всегда именно этого и хотел». Короче все не так плохо) https://t.co/4KYGNe4XB9 https://t.co/jlxy5Y9MhE
Eastwick, P. W., & Finkel, E. J. (2008). Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: Do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(2), 245–264. https://t.co/ubnF9CTjM7 https://t.co/yar5cBq2uI
Ref: David M. Buss (1989) – “Sex Differences in Human Mate Preferences: Evolutionary Hypotheses Tested in 37 Cultures” Eastwick & Finkel (2008) – “Sex Differences in Mate Preferences Revisited: Do People Know What They Initially Desire in a Romantic Partner?”
@rosegoldlights @FuriaeTradicao @ZattarRafael Segue estudos: https://t.co/82yR84c3JL https://t.co/4sz5eMLlvB https://t.co/2dApfjQulq https://t.co/wjdmMAgnG2 https://t.co/ADO4S2zN8h https://t.co/wxX1KmmKU0 https://t.co/YILDYOaluS https://t.co/jnWtHKDwwF
This article reviews research on how well people's ideal partner preferences, like physical attractiveness and earning prospects, predict their romantic evaluations, finding that physical attractiveness has a moderate…
Young men are bombarded with messages pushing them to be more masculine to attract women. This creates insecurity and often doesn't work. Learn what really makes someone attractive based on research and practical…
This video explores how traditional gender differences in mate preferences, such as attractiveness and earning potential, are less evident in real-life situations like speed dating. It highlights how people may not…
@ariagalindez @celestialbe1ng Studies show that women are influenced by physical appearance equally to men in choosing partners, they just lie about it more: https://t.co/PODynEjOMi https://t.co/sGPEBzWB5j Women are just as shallow as men if not more, you just lack self awareness about it.
@Akazunaty Mais on peut aussi observer la réalité, pas seulement ce que déclarent les gens. Pour cela, on va s’intéresser à cette étude : https://t.co/vnKjLzOKy7
The most popular answer here (C) seems just wrong (see link), as does (A). And we don't seem to mind men trying hard in many other ways. I'd guess this is just an arbitrary historical thing; could have been opposite. https://t.co/c4CFaB1QvD https://t.co/fO186Uvce1
The most popular answer here seems just wrong (see link), as does (A). And we don't seem to mind men trying hard in many other ways. I'd guess this is just an arbitrary historical thing; could have been opposite. https://t.co/c4CFaB1QvD https://t.co/fO186Uvce1
@rosegoldlights @FuriaeTradicao @ZattarRafael Segue estudos: https://t.co/82yR84c3JL https://t.co/4sz5eMLlvB https://t.co/2dApfjQulq https://t.co/wjdmMAgnG2 https://t.co/ADO4S2zN8h https://t.co/wxX1KmmKU0 https://t.co/YILDYOaluS https://t.co/jnWtHKDwwF
Ref: David M. Buss (1989) – “Sex Differences in Human Mate Preferences: Evolutionary Hypotheses Tested in 37 Cultures” Eastwick & Finkel (2008) – “Sex Differences in Mate Preferences Revisited: Do People Know What They Initially Desire in a Romantic Partner?”
@koi_n0_yokan Плюс есть исследование, согласно которому, если человек начинает отношения с кем-то, кто незначительно не соответствует его идеалу, он склонен подгонять идеал под партнера, «я всегда именно этого и хотел». Короче все не так плохо) https://t.co/4KYGNe4XB9 https://t.co/jlxy5Y9MhE
@_il_rossonero @The_Last_Gasp @Il_Basato_ (3 su 3) Gli uomini che mostrano questi tratti risultano più attraenti per le done. [2] Fonti: [1]"Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: Do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner?" [2]"Sex Differences in Human Mate Preferences"
another fun fact is that i just watched this tonight. fun to know that a research said the most ideal partner based on the survey is someone that similar to their personality. which i love to. i think it amplifies how beautiful to love yourself well. https://t.co/h7eMRgcX4D
@discordspies Source: https://t.co/bp3Xj1uzTH They do have an explanation in their moethod section. They used six (subjective) judges. That's a very small sample; I'd say they'd need the same sample size there as they'd need for the same experiment...
@DeadFishCapital @IncelsCo Eastwick PW, Finkel EJ. 2008. Sex Differences in Mate Preferences Revisited: Do People Know What They Initially Desire in a Romantic Partner? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 94(2):245-264.
The "ideal partner" according to research & why it might not matter https://t.co/98pZ2qdsok via @YouTube
@Infantminds but i dont read papers, it's from this video https://t.co/43NryYhdom
Eastwick, P. W., & Finkel, E. J. (2008). Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: Do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(2), 245–264. https://t.co/ubnF9CTjM7 https://t.co/yar5cBq2uI
The "ideal partner" according to research & why it might not matter https://t.co/98pZ2qdsok via @YouTube
The "ideal partner" according to research & why it might not matter https://t.co/ZTevoV0yTp via @YouTube
RH
AY
M
PG
AR
EA
RC
S
U
T