Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
There is strong consensus among posters that the carbon footprint of food transportation is relatively minor, with repeated emphasis on the point that 'food choices matter more than food miles.' Phrases like 'the idea that eating local beef is better than lentils is just wrong' and 'dietary shift can lower food-related climate footprints' illustrate the conviction with which users engage. The tone combines assertive statements with an urgency to shift public understanding towards dietary impacts, indicating the discussions have a nuanced understanding of climate science.
The majority of discussions express strong agreement with the article's conclusion that food production, not transportation, is the primary contributor to greenhouse gas emissions.
Participants show high levels of interest in the research by seeking additional information and discussing related studies.
Many posters engage deeply by referencing specific data from the article, sharing links, and discussing alternative dietary choices.
There is a consensus that the findings of this publication could significantly influence public perceptions and behaviors regarding food choices.
which has more environmental impact, choosing 'local' or choosing certain foods? production=83% of food emissions delivery=4% "Shifting less than 1 day/wk from red meat/dairy to chicken, fish, eggs, veg = more GHG reduction than buying all local food" https://t.co/C79fh2URqQ
Cargo ships use fossil fuels & go long distances, but they are efficient ways to transport goods. See e.g. this table from pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/.... If you want to reduce food transport emissions, avoid air-freighted foods (it's more rare, but some produce & seafood is shipped by plane). 3/
When I bring up local food every environmental academic I know brings up this article. It literally tries to argue that eating local does nothing for carbon emissions. I am losing my damn mind. https://t.co/iiViE7La8N
I recently appeared on @NutritionMadeS3's channel to break down the problems & causes of climate change, and its sources on our dinner plates. I'm especially impressed with Gil for working to track down the references to *every single one* of my claims. https://t.co/FsH3ItImUu
full video https://t.co/3uI6C5261Q ft. a masterclass by @matthewhayek with dozens of peer-reviewed references and all the info linked
This video explores how our food choices influence climate change. Although food transportation contributes only 11% of greenhouse gas emissions, food production is the major factor. Red meat notably increases…
Reducing food's environmental impacts is crucial. This video explores the significant contribution of food production to greenhouse gas emissions, emphasizing that dietary changes, especially reducing red meat…
@NoFarmsNoFoods Transportation accounts for only 11% of the carbon footprint of food with 83% attributable to production. If one believes eating local beef is environmentally better than lentils shipped from far away, then it's a problem. https://t.co/GDV0lyiEoX
Cargo ships use fossil fuels & go long distances, but they are efficient ways to transport goods. See e.g. this table from pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/.... If you want to reduce food transport emissions, avoid air-freighted foods (it's more rare, but some produce & seafood is shipped by plane). 3/
@cameronoran @JTommins https://t.co/8njg1PpZ5v https://t.co/SgLhvwFVSn https://t.co/gryY19DZhH https://t.co/HZUmml0yK9 https://t.co/wGILYbLj40
PS: Here are a few links to explore further if you're interested in learning more about this topic! 1. https://t.co/61Co5r490f 2.https://t.co/L3PAEDHtq1 3.https://t.co/t1Bqy1gFNS.
@DanPotman @WDean68 @JessLReid It is, actually. Transportation accounts for a surprisingly small portion of food emissions. What you eat is way more important than where you're getting it from. Imported plants are generally better for the enviroment than meat produced nearby. https://t.co/zYYXLaLUic
@serbanica9 intimately linked https://t.co/3uI6C5261Q
@jondel747 we covered that exact Q here https://t.co/3uI6C52DRo
@alistair___s @fleroy1974 Transportation accounts for only 11% of the carbon footprint of food with 83% attributable to production. So the idea that you’re doing more for the planet by eating animal products produced locally rather than imported plant based foods is just wrong. https://t.co/GDV0lyiEoX
@RonnyFranke1979 @GegenRechts4 @lib_t1m @RobertHerter https://t.co/6EiDB5vVuV es macht viel mehr aus was man isst, als woher es kommt. Und auch wie viel weggeworfen wird macht einen sehr großen Anteil aus.
@LaMemeingOfLife @ChadNotChud Travel is a tiny part of food emissions https://t.co/08exuVF9cg how about we let people have vegetables in the winter
@LogicIllustrat @Hangon1993 You conveniently ignore 1) that transportation accounts for only 11% of the carbon footprint of food with 83% attributable to production.https://t.co/ZKNYsvVK5M 2) and 3) however you cut it and however you look at it, it takes many pounds of plants to protein one pound of animal
@Melv137879 Transportation accounts for only 11% of the carbon footprint of food with 83% attributable to production. So the idea that you’re doing more for the environment by eating animal products produced locally rather than imported plants is just wrong. https://t.co/GDV0lyiEoX
@Cobra_FX_ La note de P. Desrochers et H. Shimizu cite l'étude de C. L. Weber et H. S. Matthews qui montre que* https://t.co/chCe0kBJcI
@VeganRecovering Transportation accounts for only 11% of the carbon footprint of food with 83% attributable to production. So the idea that you’re doing more for the environment by eating animal products produced locally rather than imported vegetables is just wrong. https://t.co/GDV0lyiEoX
@pripley2426 @DrAlanDesmond @ChrisGPackham This is a US but you get the picture... https://t.co/GDW2x5WxF8
RT @AdamRMG: @IoanRhysWillia1 @Cambridge_Uni 1/ Transportation accounts for only 11% of the carbon footprint of food with 83% attributable…
RT @AdamRMG: @IoanRhysWillia1 @Cambridge_Uni 1/ Transportation accounts for only 11% of the carbon footprint of food with 83% attributable…
@FlontzyBear @FoodProfessor Transportation accounts for only 11% of the carbon footprint of food with 83% attributable to production. So the idea that you’re doing more for the environment by eating animal products produced locally rather than imported plants is just wrong. https://t.co/GDV0lyiEoX
@AbidgaDiet it will cost more NOT to address it https://t.co/3uI6C5261Q
@CaryKelly11 hi, yes, this is possibly the #1 most FAQ, we covered it extensively here (with all the references): https://t.co/3uI6C5261Q
@KayLKelley fossil fuels have a bigger impact than anything. sadly fixing only fuel wouldn't cut it, we need to fix the food system as well https://t.co/3uI6C5261Q
@victouflachips1 i did. sadly, it's not enough https://t.co/3uI6C5261Q
@QuickDickMcDick Transportation accounts for only 11% of the carbon footprint of food, 83% attributable to production. So the idea that you’re doing more for the environment by eating animal products produced locally rather than importing plant based foods is just wrong. https://t.co/GDV0lyjcev
@DemianBellido @22xTJuan Acá tenés una introducción al problema del sector agroalimentario y el cambio climático: https://t.co/xR227Wuk2o
https://t.co/J3cmCz1S9z
@Court_Reinland @JulianMellentin Transportation accounts for only 11% of the carbon footprint of food with 83% attributable to production. https://t.co/GDV0lyjcev ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ If one believes eating local beef is better than lentils shipped from far away or plant based meat, then it's a problem. https://t.co/qFfv1VCddm
RT @Sentient_Media: "Generally speaking, you're going to have a higher environmental impact by eating higher up on the food chain, eating m…
RT @Sentient_Media: "Generally speaking, you're going to have a higher environmental impact by eating higher up on the food chain, eating m…
RT @Sentient_Media: "Generally speaking, you're going to have a higher environmental impact by eating higher up on the food chain, eating m…
https://t.co/GpcFNzYG9C #veganism #vegans #environnement #ecology #animalindustry #plantbased #ClimateCrisis #climatechange
@jongodwin_ @AllanRSavory Matthew Hayek, who wrote the comment below (the metric favors reducing herds over no herd at all, even though any ruminant adds methane & any methane adds to the warming effect) is currently giving good basic explainers here: (1st part, more to come) https://t.co/EjBlsE9NxX https://t.co/bkh29mZLQQ
RT @NutritionMadeS3: full video https://t.co/3uI6C5261Q ft. a masterclass by @matthewhayek with dozens of peer-reviewed references and all…
RT @Sentient_Media: "Generally speaking, you're going to have a higher environmental impact by eating higher up on the food chain, eating m…
RT @matthewhayek: I recently appeared on @NutritionMadeS3's channel to break down the problems & causes of climate change, and its sources…
RT @matthewhayek: I recently appeared on @NutritionMadeS3's channel to break down the problems & causes of climate change, and its sources…
RT @matthewhayek: I recently appeared on @NutritionMadeS3's channel to break down the problems & causes of climate change, and its sources…
RT @Sentient_Media: "Generally speaking, you're going to have a higher environmental impact by eating higher up on the food chain, eating m…
RT @matthewhayek: I recently appeared on @NutritionMadeS3's channel to break down the problems & causes of climate change, and its sources…
First video here: https://t.co/FsH3ItImUu
RT @Sentient_Media: "Generally speaking, you're going to have a higher environmental impact by eating higher up on the food chain, eating m…
RT @Sentient_Media: "Generally speaking, you're going to have a higher environmental impact by eating higher up on the food chain, eating m…
"Generally speaking, you're going to have a higher environmental impact by eating higher up on the food chain, eating more animals." @matthewhayek explores how our food choices impact the planet in the latest @NutritionMadeS3 video: https://t.co/O8EkomXoIJ
RT @matthewhayek: I recently appeared on @NutritionMadeS3's channel to break down the problems & causes of climate change, and its sources…
I recently appeared on @NutritionMadeS3's channel to break down the problems & causes of climate change, and its sources on our dinner plates. I'm especially impressed with Gil for working to track down the references to *every single one* of my claims. https://t.co/FsH3ItImUu
full video https://t.co/3uI6C5261Q ft. a masterclass by @matthewhayek with dozens of peer-reviewed references and all the info linked
@jasonhickel YOUR household has power. https://t.co/degxBXnVZp #ClimateDiet #ClimateMitigation #ClimateActionNow https://t.co/oomBeywk7m
@ClairinaPaq Transportation accounts for only 11% of the carbon footprint of food, 83% is attributable to production. The idea that you’re doing more for the environment by eating animal products produced locally rather than imported plant based food is just wrong. https://t.co/w6D4ZYh7bi
用電動車與吃素沒有衝突，兩者可兼得 而且這也適用於運送農作物與植物性食物 另有研究指出，運輸只占食物百分之11的排放，而83%的放出，是在生產過程中(在離開農場前)。 https://t.co/rWW5q2LGBx https://t.co/Af9RqGtFWE https://t.co/eV0ic0ZJ9c
@kristjanlepik @ShipSort How do? Read through to everything sourced: https://t.co/2lQIxkCWnW https://t.co/0WspXORuYz https://t.co/vckwW2gH00 https://t.co/LmWQgbwogZ https://t.co/3gUsvYw977
@toomanyfigs @raynefq @wauliepalnuts https://t.co/a5ARrNTpXn
@VeganRecovering @NickPapageorge1 @hairyhillfarmer Food choices are about 7 times more important than food miles. Being plant based in diet beats animal-eating locavores by a huge margin. Vegan meats are nutritious and delicious and don’t involve unnecessary killing.
@cashandcarrots @VeganRecovering Here’s a peer reviewed study supporting the fact that a 100% plant-sourced protein diet generates 7 times less GHGs than the average locavore diet with an average amount of animal protein. https://t.co/Vi5n2tIG9Z
@RealStephenKerr Transportation accounts for only 11% of the carbon footprint of food with 83% attributable to production. https://t.co/GDV0lyjcev ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ If one believes eating local beef is environmentally better than lentils shipped from far away, then it's a problem.
@FinnWeb80333210 @JumboTheJumb @e5paciopr0fundo @neo_sev7n @image_origins Vegan food is better for the enviroment, even when transported long distances. https://t.co/zYYXLaLUic
@OdietVincent @MR_Mick19 @elevageintensif @PEAasso On mange local pour l'écologie. Une étude montre que manger végane (même non local) est bien plus écologique que de manger local, ce qui est logique vu que l'élevage crée énormément d'émissions de gaz à effet de serre: https://t.co/2x7eNNI029. Local c'est bien,végane c'est mieux!
@TheOldestJaden @kyle__cb A mild dietary shift is a dramatically more effective way to reduce carbon emissions. https://t.co/9ptc2FbM1o
RT @RizomaSchool: When I bring up local food every environmental academic I know brings up this article. It literally tries to argue that…
When I bring up local food every environmental academic I know brings up this article. It literally tries to argue that eating local does nothing for carbon emissions. I am losing my damn mind. https://t.co/iiViE7La8N
@bob4barrie @FoodProfessor @GlobeScan Transportation accounts for only 11% of the carbon footprint of food with 83% attributable to production. If one believes eating local beef is environmentally better than lentils shipped from far away, then it's a problem. https://t.co/GDV0lyjcev ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
@benmesot @laliberte Source https://t.co/t8FpeeywLR
@mysicksadlife @LeftCoastVegan @fig_latin @edgarrmcgregor @elizabeth2nan Local is better if possible but diet change away from animal products reduces GHGs more: https://t.co/v6TDVQKsSi
Food-Miles and the Relative Climate Impacts of Food Choices in the United States https://t.co/x7CnOKjrUb
@LaurenInTheWild @nebula_king @growing_daniel @wunderkimmy Transportation accounts for only 11% of the carbon footprint of food with 83% attributable to production. So the idea that you’re doing more for the environment by eating animal products produced locally rather than imported plant based foods is wrong. https://t.co/GDV0ly130n
@AdamRizoNegro @GeorgeMonbiot https://t.co/x7CnOKjrUb
"We find that although food is transported long distances in general the GHG emissions associated with food are dominated by the production phase, contributing 83% of the average U.S. household’s 8.1 t CO2e/yr footprint for food..." https://t.co/BxY8E9vcqf
@mandyduq @sielven in terms of data and quantitative researches, it is objectively stated how "no meat>eating local" produces less carbon footprint. [https://t.co/1UXlNVElFS, scihub to, if u dont mind
RT @garylfrancione: According to this study, transportation accounts for only 11% of the carbon footprint of food with 83% attributable to…
RT @garylfrancione: According to this study, transportation accounts for only 11% of the carbon footprint of food with 83% attributable to…
RT @garylfrancione: According to this study, transportation accounts for only 11% of the carbon footprint of food with 83% attributable to…
According to this study, transportation accounts for only 11% of the carbon footprint of food with 83% attributable to production. So the claim that it's eco better to eat local animal products rather than vegetables transported in is just wrong. #vegan https://t.co/4CDT37tQTd
@Carrocombate @luisglezreyes @ecologistas @lauravilladiego @nazaret_castro_ @BrendaChavez_ @alcojor @LMClimatica @AmigosTierraEsp @JusticiaAliment No es sólo una gráfica. Eso es sólo un resumen de diferentes estudios (ver referencias) que soportan el argumento. Por ejemplo (uno entre muchos): https://t.co/d0ONdVb1nd https://t.co/xwaxwRI6AL
RT @danigeos: Climate-friendly food consumption is not about food transport: "emissions associated with food are dominated by the productio…
@DonDimarcus @TennisRoba @GoblinTownClown @SustainableDish Transportation accounts for only 11% of the carbon footprint of food with 83% attributable to production. So the idea that you’re doing more for the environment by eating animal products produced locally rather than imported plant based food is wrong. https://t.co/GDV0ly130n
@GBNEWS Transportation accounts for only 11% of the carbon footprint of food with 83% attributable to production. So the idea that you’re doing more for the environment by eating animal products produced locally rather than imported food is just wrong. https://t.co/GDV0lyjcev
RT @jfpayne: @MeatFreeMonday @agricontract @marksandspencer Thanks this shows the figures were based on this study https://t.co/rTFGF4Ue0n…
@MeatFreeMonday @agricontract @marksandspencer Thanks this shows the figures were based on this study https://t.co/rTFGF4Ue0n which is entirely based around the US food system in 2008. Stop using it in British classrooms.
@willpenrievans @marksandspencer Hi Will, what did they get wrong? As far as I know this statement is accurate and based on rigorous data (it comes from this study). https://t.co/DWSOjaSjxs
@Liv63412074 @StephenCorrySvl There have been more than one studies on 'food miles'! E.g. below. As to the global South: much of the feed that most livestock receives comes from there. For instance the soya fed to pigs, chicken/other poultry, dairy cows (unlike the far smaller amount https://t.co/LMkTWYqHDr https://t.co/7E2kTrxNqd
@Staticstats https://t.co/C79fh2URqQ https://t.co/MnASGjoX4r
@skyedonald @SwampCommunist Transportation accounts for only 11% of the carbon footprint of food with 83% attributable to production. https://t.co/GDV0lyiEoX ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ If one believes eating local beef is environmentally better than lentils shipped from far away, then it's a problem.
@rockhillsranch @ben_elgin @business Transportation accounts for only 11% of the carbon footprint of food with 83% attributable to production. https://t.co/GDV0ly130n If one believes eating local beef is environmentally better than lentils shipped from far away, then we've got a problem.
RT @xoiiku: @HomeFarmMagpie @Cambridge_Uni Local is not a panacea, food-miles < #TenPercentLaw. "the GHG emissions associated with food ar…
@KaiHeron It is a relevant factor, but you might be overestimating the emissions from food-miles. "Transportation as a whole represents only 11% of life-cycle GHG emissions, and final delivery from producer to retail contributes only 4%." https://t.co/qeIIIkCJgG
RT @AdamRMG: @henrytheeVth @hominigritz @JnxOuaquaga @dre4earth Transportation accounts for only 11% of the carbon footprint of food with 8…
@henrytheeVth @hominigritz @JnxOuaquaga @dre4earth Transportation accounts for only 11% of the carbon footprint of food with 83% attributable to production. So the idea that you’re doing more for the environment by eating animal products produced locally rather than imported plant based foods is just wrong.https://t.co/GDV0lyiEoX
@mxssmara @ChadNotChud Food miles aren't actually that significant, all things considered: "dietary shift can be a more effective means of lowering an average household’s food-related climate footprint than "buying local." https://t.co/CdAAU6AZZo
@LizWebsterLD @GMB @BritishSave Not following science (2 of 2): "vast majority of GHGs associated with food comes from production ( average 83%), not from transport (11%). Plant-based food produces vastly less GHG emissions in production than animal-based food, such as meat and dairy." https://t.co/j8CTTa2Ozs
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: The impact of food miles is very small by comparison even to the *current account emissions* of meat production, let alo…
@PremInspect @pjungar @KenDBerryMD @The_Nutrivore Generally speaking they have the science on their side when it comes to impacts on GHG emissions and full life cycle analysis in food production. Transport plays a much smaller role than how food is produced. https://t.co/v9AvtgODbC https://t.co/S0ivRaRBZd
@queen_kayde Transportation accounts for 11% of the carbon footprint of food with 83% attributable to production. So the idea that you’re doing more for the environment by eating animal products produced locally rather than imported plant based foods is just wrong. https://t.co/GDV0ly130n
@queen_kayde Food miles aren't actually that significant, all things considered: "dietary shift can be a more effective means of lowering an average household’s food-related climate footprint than "buying local." https://t.co/CdAAU6AZZo
@AskingForHelp11 @Rightturn_only @DanDanTransient Transportation accounts for only 11% of the carbon footprint of food with 83% attributable to production. So the idea that you’re doing more for the environment by eating animal products produced locally rather than imported vegetables is just wrong. https://t.co/GDV0ly130n
@eatsmorechicken 2/ Transportation accounts for only 11% of the carbon footprint of food with 83% attributable to production. So the idea that you’re doing more for the environment by eating animal products produced locally rather than imported vegetables is just wrong. https://t.co/GDV0ly130n
@CarolSm36140650 @EarthKindness @jannarden How do you ethically kill someone who doesn't want to die? Transportation is only 11% of the carbon footprint of food with 83% being production. If one believes eating local beef is better than lentils shipped from far away, then it's a problem. https://t.co/GDV0lyiEoX
@mindsoul @s_ch12472829 @alex_avoigt The data is clear. https://t.co/xgNF8Nhv70
@blue_coat @nationalpost Transportation accounts for only 11% of the carbon footprint of food with 83% attributable to production. The idea that we're doing more for the environment by eating animal products produced locally rather than imported plant based foods is just wrong. https://t.co/GDV0ly130n
@Teamo_A_GoGo @ezraklein Transportation accounts for only 11% of the carbon footprint of food with 83% attributable to production. If one believes eating local beef is environmentally better than lentils shipped from far away, then it's a problem. https://t.co/GDV0ly130n
@Hairy_Godfather @NeolithicSheep @LouisatheLast Food miles aren't actually that significant, all things considered: "dietary shift can be a more effective means of lowering an average household’s food-related climate footprint than "buying local." https://t.co/CdAAU6AZZo
@norleeebonite @JessLReid @soda_won @BurgerKingCAN Transportation accounts for only 11% of the carbon footprint of food with 83% attributable to production. So the idea that you’re doing more for the environment by eating animal products produced locally rather than imported vegetables is just wrong. https://t.co/GDV0ly130n
@IoanRhysWillia1 @Cambridge_Uni 1/ Transportation accounts for only 11% of the carbon footprint of food with 83% attributable to production. So the idea that you’re doing more for the environment by eating animal products produced locally rather than imported vegetables is just wrong. https://t.co/GDV0ly130n
@AmbassadorVarg @Mudaship39 @Imani_Barbarin But until we somehow demolish capitalism plant-based eating, as the lesser evil overall on all fronts, should be encouraged when a possibility, and be the focus before also trying to eat as local as possible. https://t.co/YwXv9eKZkv
V*gans love calling anyone who acknowledges science instead of their religion a “troll”. It’s how they maintain their in-group identity. But eating chicken isn’t worse for the environment than eating fruits & veggies. The enemy is red meat, not meat: https://t.co/Oega70KMFy
@Manglewood The average American consumer replacing the calories from poultry with fruits & veggies would make climate change worse. Citation: https://t.co/Oega70KMFy
@Manglewood Citations, even though this isn’t the point of this conversation: * 30% reduction in beef emissions possible with zero dietary changes: https://t.co/0zy4dTGWrN * Red meat is bad, dairy is half as bad, poultry is about the same as every other food source: https://t.co/Oega70KMFy
@CaroleDelga @Occitanie @presseoccitanie @suddefrance @QualivoresOc @agneaupyrenees @noir_debigorre @InterbioO @MinToulouse @VincentLabarthe @ChambragriLr En outre, une étude montre également que manger végétal (même non local) a plus d'effets bénéfiques pour l'environnement que le fait de manger local, ce qui est logique vu que l'élevage crée plus d'émissions de gaz à effet de serre que transport : https://t.co/2x7eNNHscB
RT @AnouLaVictoire: @L214 @Conv_Citoyenne @barbarapompili une étude montre également que manger végétal (même non local) a plus d'effets bé…
@L214 @Conv_Citoyenne @barbarapompili une étude montre également que manger végétal (même non local) a plus d'effets bénéfiques pour l'environnement que le fait de manger local, ce qui est logique vu que l'élevage crée plus d'émissions de gaz à effet de serre que transport : https://t.co/2x7eNNHscB
RT @AnouLaVictoire: @J_Denormandie @RPFranceUE @Agri_Gouv @barbarapompili Pour une politique agricole écologique: étude: manger végétal (m…
RT @AnouLaVictoire: @gouvernementFR @J_Denormandie @Agri_Gouv Une étude montre que manger végétal (même non local) a plus d'effets bénéfiqu…
@CarnivoreIs @DenisS0rn https://t.co/ynwv5p6ZEM this study suggest that in the US red meat is 150% more GUG intensive than chicken or fish.
RT @AnouLaVictoire: @J_Denormandie @RPFranceUE @Agri_Gouv @barbarapompili Pour une politique agricole écologique: étude: manger végétal (m…
@J_Denormandie @RPFranceUE @Agri_Gouv @barbarapompili Pour une politique agricole écologique: étude: manger végétal (même non local) a plus d'effets bénéfiques pour l'environnement que le fait de manger local, car l'élevage crée plus d'émissions de gaz à effet de serre que transport : https://t.co/2x7eNNHscB
@J_Denormandie une étude montre que manger végétal (même non local) a plus d'effets bénéfiques pour l'environnement que le fait de manger local, ce qui est logique vu que l'élevage crée plus d'émissions de gaz à effet de serre que transport : https://t.co/2x7eNNHscB
@LCP @J_Denormandie Une étude montre également que manger végétal (même non local) a plus d'effets bénéfiques pour l'environnement que le fait de manger local, ce qui est logique vu que l'élevage crée plus d'émissions de gaz à effet de serre que transport : https://t.co/2x7eNNHscB
@gouvernementFR @J_Denormandie @Agri_Gouv Une étude montre que manger végétal (même non local) a plus d'effets bénéfiques pour l'environnement que le fait de manger local, ce qui est logique vu que l'élevage crée plus d'émissions de gaz à effet de serre que transport : https://t.co/2x7eNNHscB
@J_Denormandie @ggomez_chef Une autre étude montre également que manger végétal (même non local) a plus d'effets bénéfiques pour l'environnement que le fait de manger local, ce qui est logique vu que l'élevage crée plus d'émissions de gaz à effet de serre que transport : https://t.co/2x7eNNHscB
@edpsydan @CRRESmodel @DrMarySD @Riverford Yes! Eating local can be good for other reasons (knowing your farmer and where your food comes from etc.) but reducing meat (beef especially) tends to be more important for the climate. Lots of great research on this: https://t.co/qkk7Tl61wf
@_DancingFox @uyarakq A good thing to do for the enviroment, but choosing plant-based eating is quite a bit more important. https://t.co/YwXv9eKZkv
➡️ Cela est conforme aux résultats de la plus grosse méta-étude sur le sujet qui avait fait l'objet du premier tweet de cette page (https://t.co/VuMqcXUm7H) Issus de : C. L. Weber et al. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 10, 3508–3513 https://t.co/C4zWHRxeQ8
@dragy_el @PetitAstronome @regelegorila Merci pour ta réponse, mais il y a beaucoup de choses erronées parmi tes affirmations...
@crikeyoblimey @SarahShuffell @ubfarm2000 @LidlGB Weber, C. L., & Matthews, H. S. (2008). Food-miles and the relative climate impacts of food choices in the United States. Environmental science & technology, 42(10), 3508-3513. Available at: https://t.co/7cyd7rzlgB
RT @joel27799310: "La entrega del productor al minorista contribuye solo con el 4% [de las emisiones de alimentos]. Cambiar menos de un día…
"La entrega del productor al minorista contribuye solo con el 4% [de las emisiones de alimentos]. Cambiar menos de un día por semana la carne roja [por] vegetales logra una mayor reducción de GEI que comprando todos los alimentos de origen local". https://t.co/nLYXxIwbR0 https://t.co/1UhI5s03c6
@JodiKoberinski @FoodProfessor Transportation accounts for only 11% of the carbon footprint of food with 83% attributable to production. If one believes eating local beef is environmentally better than lentils shipped from far away, then it's a problem. https://t.co/GDV0ly130n
@StynaLane @twitchyspoonie Yeah it's actually pretty easy to say plant-based eating is more sustainable overall even if there's extra miles involved since it's true. https://t.co/YwXv9eKZkv
@plazynoodles Overall it is still generally better for climate change when it comes to a diet even if there's more foods that are transported from longer away. https://t.co/YwXv9eKZkv
@seedsgirl @LactoClassicist @1GarethWynJones @BBCClick @BBCBreakfast @BeyondMeat @IKEAUK @GHGGuru https://t.co/M11iiLKgnF
@FandomjunkieZee @ZenMeoww Considering how many resources are put into beef production compared to quinoa I quite heavily doubt the food miles tip the scales that much: https://t.co/YwXv9eKZkv So yeah the vegans should prob still go off on things that are excessively harmful for the beings on the planet.
@CroplyOrg @20_farms https://t.co/EiDA2aXki6
@CeroniAlessio @gabriela_k94 @TheEconomist The same is true in the US despite an average "6760 km life-cycle supply chain" https://t.co/EiDA2beV9E
@eleanorchubb @skully068 @jaynemendy It’s not all animals, though. Just red meat. Chicken, fish, and eggs actually produce less GHG than vegetable production does. Source: https://t.co/8q95xBiUUy https://t.co/XPffkqIdVf
RT @JohnG41691251: @512Amandine @KaysieMeehan @tghw @DavidGMcAfee Here are some sources to back up that fact. https://t.co/ETuiRqEXUq https…
@512Amandine @KaysieMeehan @tghw @DavidGMcAfee Here are some sources to back up that fact. https://t.co/ETuiRqEXUq https://t.co/EiDA2aXki6 https://t.co/z755xyRKNf
@rachelglacier Local is super important when it comes to equity, but I do want to point out that eating local is often a privilege as well, and emissions are minor compared to even just beef. That said, I agree the most important thing is making sure everyone can eat. https://t.co/JzpVaiXouL
@Madeline_Pine @carolannjaneee "...and importing everything negatively impacts the environment." Less so than animals products. https://t.co/YwXv9eKZkv
RT @NutritionMadeS3: which has more environmental impact, choosing 'local' or choosing certain foods? production=83% of food emissions de…
RT @NutritionMadeS3: which has more environmental impact, choosing 'local' or choosing certain foods? production=83% of food emissions de…
RT @NutritionMadeS3: which has more environmental impact, choosing 'local' or choosing certain foods? production=83% of food emissions de…
RT @NutritionMadeS3: which has more environmental impact, choosing 'local' or choosing certain foods? production=83% of food emissions de…
RT @NutritionMadeS3: which has more environmental impact, choosing 'local' or choosing certain foods? production=83% of food emissions de…
RT @NutritionMadeS3: which has more environmental impact, choosing 'local' or choosing certain foods? production=83% of food emissions de…
@orientalnegrow "EAT LOCALLY SOURCED FOODS whether it's meat or not" https://t.co/YwXv9eKZkv ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
RT @NutritionMadeS3: which has more environmental impact, choosing 'local' or choosing certain foods? production=83% of food emissions de…
RT @NutritionMadeS3: which has more environmental impact, choosing 'local' or choosing certain foods? production=83% of food emissions de…
@respectfullivin source: https://t.co/6JDLYskvnB US data on food sustainability by type, location etc: https://t.co/C79fh2URqQ
RT @NutritionMadeS3: which has more environmental impact, choosing 'local' or choosing certain foods? production=83% of food emissions de…
RT @NutritionMadeS3: which has more environmental impact, choosing 'local' or choosing certain foods? production=83% of food emissions de…
RT @NutritionMadeS3: which has more environmental impact, choosing 'local' or choosing certain foods? production=83% of food emissions de…
RT @NutritionMadeS3: which has more environmental impact, choosing 'local' or choosing certain foods? production=83% of food emissions de…
RT @NutritionMadeS3: which has more environmental impact, choosing 'local' or choosing certain foods? production=83% of food emissions de…
RT @NutritionMadeS3: which has more environmental impact, choosing 'local' or choosing certain foods? production=83% of food emissions de…
which has more environmental impact, choosing 'local' or choosing certain foods? production=83% of food emissions delivery=4% "Shifting less than 1 day/wk from red meat/dairy to chicken, fish, eggs, veg = more GHG reduction than buying all local food" https://t.co/C79fh2URqQ
@physicslesbian They're calling the act of eating meat unethical when one is able to sustain oneself without it. The harvesting of crops is the less unethical option overall, & is generally the less unsustainable option even with a bit more of them from further away. https://t.co/YwXv9eKZkv
@TMSBurke @rte Though it very much seems like the food miles are much less of an issue than animal products when it comes to climate impacts: https://t.co/YwXv9eKZkv
@MaryPawleWines @Lillylatelee @rte Though it seems the best way to cut down on ones carbon footprint would be to replace animal products with plant products even when more of them would be imported. https://t.co/YwXv9eKZkv
@deanmalmgren @MeganKonar Here is a well known paper on food miles https://t.co/auMPtIyCgr Quite often the worst part of the transport could be driving the SUV to the supermarket...
RT @SightandLife: 1⃣ week to go until #WorldEggDay!! Did you know that #eggs are a climate smart food?? Compared to #dairy & #meat, eggs ha…
1⃣ week to go until #WorldEggDay!! Did you know that #eggs are a climate smart food?? Compared to #dairy & #meat, eggs have 2 to 8 times lower carbon footprint (#GHG emissions) & 2 to 4 times lower ecological footprint (water + land use)! https://t.co/mVlN8jYaZO #SALloveseggs https://t.co/zCUt2RMUt9
RT @GurrenMeta: https://t.co/3DL3gyFtWE (Merci à @JSPVoyager pour la source, celles de @Botanygeek sont référencées dans des articles paya…
https://t.co/3DL3gyFtWE (Merci à @JSPVoyager pour la source, celles de @Botanygeek sont référencées dans des articles payants) https://t.co/pXLB4ujVys
RT @JSPVoyager: @GurrenMeta @roryofroom La source https://t.co/xlLLM914Vq
@GurrenMeta @roryofroom La source https://t.co/xlLLM914Vq
RT @Peters_Glen: @richardabetts @robbie_andrew @bobvanoort1 It sounds intuitive that food miles are important, but they are not. Loads of s…
RT @Peters_Glen: @richardabetts @robbie_andrew @bobvanoort1 It sounds intuitive that food miles are important, but they are not. Loads of s…
@richardabetts @robbie_andrew @bobvanoort1 It sounds intuitive that food miles are important, but they are not. Loads of studies confirm this. Two here https://t.co/9sZGdvSRUV https://t.co/auMPtIyCgr Unless you are flying your food by plane (unlikely), food miles will not be important. 4/