Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
Many posts reference earlier studies, particularly a notable 2008 article discussing mask efficacy, using phrases like 'All types of masks reduced aerosol exposure' to emphasize their importance. The choice of words—like 'strongly supportive' and 'evidence'—along with a tone of urgency in some posts, showcases a desire to reinforce the discussion around mask use, suggesting a societal need to revisit and value established research.
The majority of discussions reflect support for the publication's findings regarding masks, though some skepticism exists.
Participants demonstrate high curiosity about the effectiveness of masks, leading to various references to past studies.
While many posts refer to the research, they largely express opinions rather than deeply explore its implications.
Many contributors believe that the research findings could significantly influence public health policy and mask usage.
@Gezeurig Ik ga echt gillen. Het onderzoek waar Duitsland haar mondkapjesbeleid op baseert is dus gedaan door arts-epidemioloog Marianne van der Sande in 2008 TOEN ZE BIJ HET RIVM werkte. Dat zelfde RIVM erkent nu niet haar eigen onderzoek in 2008???
I've heard people say surgical masks don't seal tightly at all. Tests on 21 people found average fit effectiveness of 79%--far from perfect, but far better than nothing. https://t.co/hr6X0o5UDr #COVID19 #WHO #PPE https://t.co/XVilUImnwr
@AnnaRotkirch @Sukkola @THLorg @mapetti Tässä esim yksi tutkimus https://t.co/W1eIZQ3Nrq
@taskivei @ivanpuopolo Tutkimuksen mukaan kaikentyyppiset maskit vähentävät viruksille altistumista ja infektioriskiä. "Any type of general mask use is likely to decrease viral exposure and infection risk on a population level" https://t.co/3pauwoqs5j
@ME_Valentijn @NOS @rivm @MinPres There is also this other one from 2008 by Marianne van der Sande (at the time RIVM). Note that it says “respiratory infections”, not “just” influenza. https://t.co/YKEfEJPm8N
Hier het onderzoek dat sinds 2008 stof ligt te vangen bij het RIVM. Professional and Home-Made Face Masks Reduce Exposure to Respiratory Infections among the General Population /103 https://t.co/eG8RspkKiD
In this video, we explore the principles of quantum entanglement and its applications in modern physics. Delve into the fascinating phenomena of particles behaving in interconnected ways, providing insights into quantum…
In light of recent evidence, we delve into how both professional and home-made masks can significantly reduce exposure to respiratory infections. Understanding their varying levels of protection is key in managing…
This video covers the critical reasons for wearing homemade masks in public during the COVID-19 pandemic. It emphasizes protecting both yourself and others, highlighting important research and references regarding virus…
@Nanu71747707 @HumanManifold @kleinMogli Es gab sogar Hilfsmittel zum Überbrücken und entsprechende Tipps damals, als man nicht an Schutzausrüstung kam https://t.co/szURB9syse
@troypallotto @smurfsj @laurame50301862 @rootfayth @thehealthb0t 2008 https://t.co/03BXtgJLOq
@NonSens76071805 @MarchandSurgery @thereallexipexi @6xblessd @doc_gero @MurielBlaivePhD > “as the science demonstrated their ineffectiveness re viral spread” ❌ False. No. Are you capable of reading these?: https://t.co/bH2svwnIhm https://t.co/XQw1WBtMEO https://t.co/03BXtgKjDY https://t.co/6depiheIf6 https://t.co/Gc7YDNzOiC https://t.co/QrgEwgBezO
@DanielS90171419 @PGtzsche1 Please update your understanding accordingly: 1998 https://t.co/bH2svwnarO 2008 https://t.co/XQw1WBtePg Also 2008 https://t.co/03BXtgJLOq https://t.co/HAfSD2dsCh
@fbkeays @calicea5411 @VPrasadMDMPH @KelleyKga False. Layperson article: https://t.co/AoPRnTZUOk Study: https://t.co/N4PjqIjs6a
@Kirkon_Rotta Year 2008 science: Professional and Home-Made Face Masks Reduce Exposure to Respiratory Infections among the General Population https://t.co/5MQ4HXgsi7
@Beekeep57518509 @DrSteveJacobs @twhitfill @teenmd Van der Sande et al. (2008): https://t.co/KtVBMft5UL
@AlbertoGasparSS @El_tebano_41 Si hay solo que no sabes leer https://t.co/yRsuX7mcvr
@mexis1979 @MandyHinz74496 @twidderix https://t.co/3KWBUhgQCS
@KobieThatcher 2008: Professional and Home-Made Face Masks Reduce Exposure to Respiratory Infections among the General Population https://t.co/5MQ4HXgsi7
@davidleon @MSW_researcher @kberkopes @HeyNurseKat @LisaWeaver98 @MarkWar16520311 This has been a thing long before Covid bro https://t.co/qidP2nPsBz
@blackopsposter @lucyeeve (Coincidentally this approach seems common among ppl for whom the potential consequences of risk and sacrifices necessary to shoulder the burden are less severe!) 1. https://t.co/MeFvcfKxVR (“All types of masks reduced aerosol exposure”) 2. https://t.co/YLIaq0CNXA (see graphic) https://t.co/WhuzqSpwTJ
@PsychToadElic @DewlineO @ArielTroster @MatthewGreenNDP @AndrewBoozary of course, i often have to correct month old sock puppet accounts making baseless claims, so i have several already handy https://t.co/NHcPHmnMsS https://t.co/jNuvRD25Uh https://t.co/06zZbW5M2n https://t.co/poURoZ6Ttn
@WildPersistence @RandallBurns5 @brosseau_lisa @jeffgilchrist It looks like though for a good fit you can get the protection factor above 300: https://t.co/ZNFiGsIzPR https://t.co/y2Nm7Cwp8U
@WildPersistence @brosseau_lisa Sande estimated that surgical mask block about 72.72% of the particles but I presume this would depend on mask quality and how it was worn (e.g. a mask brace). https://t.co/ZNFiGsIzPR
@greatgreyowls @greg_travis Like this study? https://t.co/ZNFiGsIzPR
@xoxo_benjii @jodavis3927 @nathaliejacoby1 Here, some light reading for you. Enjoy. https://t.co/G0LC9NCjCs
@BarryHunt008 What's the particle size in the figure? I ask because the following study suggests a much better protection with surgical masks: https://t.co/ZNFiGsIzPR
@BizzMac2 @CTVNews A cloth mask will block about half the particles. A surgical mask will block about 75% of the particles. https://t.co/ZNFiGsIzPR
@ladyinredwine @Rambaazamba nur das der Wisch schon ziemlich auseinander gepflückt wurde und wegen mangelnder Qualität gelöscht https://t.co/2TZztHX7ek Hier mal Studien zum Durchlesen ☺️ https://t.co/ZuXHmzJvYi https://t.co/94fzIiYoUZ
@kenny_1620 @skelly1178 @CTVNews A surgical Mask will block over 72.72 (worst case IQR) of particles between sizes 0.02 to 1 micro meters. See: M.Sande Professional and Home-Made Face Masks Reduce Exposure to Respiratory Infections among the General Population https://t.co/ZNFiGsIzPR
@paulbance1 @AlisonGeorge10 @Helen_Whately https://t.co/ElxXpatbih
@TrishtheDish_7 @DailyGrumbles @lcfairbairn @USMortality @jwbrower @nytimes 2008. https://t.co/r0mHfC4dGn 2016. https://t.co/wkPqPzlJIA 2019. https://t.co/hQZkBHEMft 2007. https://t.co/LPPKRBnKuI 2015. https://t.co/SuuA9KTXQd Didn’t need to go far. Just need to know how to search journal articles
@Dan54650492 @KellyGoodmanPhD @GidMK Not only on the models. With the people talking, walking etc. https://t.co/UhrrHsJbDQ
@kylamb8 2008: "Conclusions/Significance Any type of general mask use is likely to decrease viral exposure and infection risk on a population level, in spite of imperfect fit and imperfect adherence, personal respirators providing most protection..." https://t.co/Q7gP9UOexw
@xynyxs @lorelei3112 @ministerVWS https://t.co/ToiksVbTbC https://t.co/Q25SKFiBVH
@LoveDoesWin @GiniseJoseph @Nunny_S31 @amyriscool @KelseyMcRoss they are forced to admit: "There are currently nostudies that measure the impact of any kind of mask on theamount of infectious SARS-CoV-2 particles from human actions". They then cite: https://t.co/gHYd22PBbn Only this study didn't use real patients, only a simulation. 8/x
@milenaholdert RIVM (2008) https://t.co/jJhkRmwoWQ
@vanranstmarc Die conclusie had het RIVM zelf ook al in 2008, onder een andere directeur. https://t.co/jJhkRmwoWQ
@cbeckj @JohnOz1900 @JasonWWalton1 @theDVSMarcus @RAM0667 @ArtysHouse @MrAntiWoke @MinnesotaExpat @ALefty123 @fishyfish67 @InCytometry @ShastaGecko @Anvndarnamn5 @SndhsBl @Jaisans @USAMRIIDca @glinch72 @Alfred_StatesX @ic_lib @David4677484957 @DebraMMason1 @Guardia56241490 @DelusionsMass @Trumpbangskids @ChrisBBacon3 @VictorJennpaul @6lennybravo @Lorrilala @Neilcharles1450 @aSinister @girl_pilled @BL20422822 @RustyAway @Barbarajdurkin @MikeDel21893959 @insane_voice @EducatingTrump2 @MedBennett @SampsonRamm @CorpulentWidow @NavyBrat59 @ItsTheAtmospher @DeniersAreDerp @GSwarthout @JeffBernard1 @Based_inReality @RobertVonB1 @BellRoniBell @Jonnyporkchop @DamienHamilto17 https://t.co/SRibMt2Yq1
@cbeckj @ALefty123 @JohnOz1900 @JasonWWalton1 @theDVSMarcus @RAM0667 @ArtysHouse @MrAntiWoke @MinnesotaExpat @fishyfish67 @InCytometry @ShastaGecko @Anvndarnamn5 @SndhsBl @Jaisans @USAMRIIDca @glinch72 @Alfred_StatesX @ic_lib @David4677484957 @DebraMMason1 @Guardia56241490 @DelusionsMass @Trumpbangskids @ChrisBBacon3 @VictorJennpaul @6lennybravo @Lorrilala @Neilcharles1450 @aSinister @girl_pilled @BL20422822 @RustyAway @Barbarajdurkin @MikeDel21893959 @insane_voice @EducatingTrump2 @MedBennett @SampsonRamm @CorpulentWidow @NavyBrat59 @ItsTheAtmospher @DeniersAreDerp @GSwarthout @JeffBernard1 @Based_inReality @RobertVonB1 @BellRoniBell @Jonnyporkchop @DamienHamilto17 https://t.co/SRibMt2Yq1
@Donny39207427 Do your research. I'll get ya started https://t.co/bHdF85d5Yp https://t.co/1GYG7xcuA9 https://t.co/WOmc8A114y https://t.co/JsEWydyZ1U https://t.co/65Vx4n56eP https://t.co/cEUmahkNr4 https://t.co/LSA4inI5ow
@Donny39207427 @MikeTarnowVO @RealBenCarson https://t.co/bHdF85d5Yp https://t.co/1GYG7xcuA9 https://t.co/WOmc8A114y https://t.co/JsEWydyZ1U https://t.co/65Vx4n56eP https://t.co/cEUmahkNr4 https://t.co/LSA4inI5ow
@Yuri75 Maar in 2013 verving Jaap van Dissel Roel Coutinho als dir. vh CIb, en toen werkte mondkapjes opeens níet meer bij het RIVM. Nog één, RIVM 2008. "Any type of general mask use is likely to decrease viral exposure and infection risk on a population level" https://t.co/FAcPBzULLB
@Socrate91001568 @myrabatchelder @DrTomFrieden Even more: https://t.co/K9QKZwaVoN On Mask material https://t.co/JyXJPTWChk
@FranzRiedmann @schwarzeKatz6 @AnnaHebamme Scheinbar bist du auf Propaganda hereingefallen. Evidenz zeichnet ein ganz anderes Bild: - https://t.co/ZN5188S96A - https://t.co/1WV4a9jkRN - https://t.co/vbuUfWV8OD - https://t.co/oc8hS6Ubhw - https://t.co/Zc4k2qxgY6 - https://t.co/2vQMHK1sXp - https://t.co/eAt7shjMdH
@JSn0wd0n @light__paradise @Luvlylayy @OpheliaRue1 @rachelEfish https://t.co/sIDhz5gX2o
@BTCCHI @drbabbit 2009 - https://t.co/guyfpdpyUR 2009 - https://t.co/f4p2TQkxNy 2008 - https://t.co/P5DewFCXsZ Liars and disease vectors like you don't deserve access imo. You're free to take your chances with the virus, go for it! I won't interrupt my enemy when he is making a mistake.
@goldenbeer0 @ChaosMuli @TeeAda12 @Chessidharta @chess24com 2008: https://t.co/b4YOJkSdYQ 2017: https://t.co/4hNPhXGxyb
@TrinityAndNeo3 @puffycheesehead @MSchoderboeck @HoosierFreind @Laughin23231296 @PatrickJolle Perfect. Now let’s test your hypothesis, shall we? Here’s a study from 2008 (well before the current situation, so you can’t say it’s biased or whatever) saying that ANY kind of mask - from homemade to professional - help redusing the spread of diseases https://t.co/ElxXpatbih
@timjones1001 @TheFirstonTV Yeah…. Nah as we say down here. We’ve known since 2008 at least that they have a positive effect, despite individual variations and issues https://t.co/dCwhEhYmF8
@wiseandwhitty @jlkragt @kittenbiskits @mkolken Just because you don’t understand how it works, doesn’t mean it can’t work
@ScreamingLordB @chriszeeven @NUnl Link naar onderzoek RIVM 2008: https://t.co/mJxYtoCafC
@I_laugh_alot @Carrie_Kelly17 @IzzieMac1 @tuitmuit @MikeinCincinna1 @AlexBerenson Even masks made of T-shirt material reduce droplets majorly. https://t.co/1bLZC4l6xL Wet masks are annoying but they still work. https://t.co/GfpZeIIgbN And surgical masks aren’t so expensive at ~10 cents in bulk that you can’t bring a second to swap out while the other dries.
@truthwarrior324 @gbosslet OK. Here you go: https://t.co/UydaPHce6X
@alienhybridmami @cokeandcake https://t.co/ukN87MqiX7 https://t.co/dToIMz91wJ https://t.co/MZEvD5pIB1 https://t.co/hXuiqhmbSM https://t.co/yfLUaZVY4W https://t.co/EFcETBGy9N https://t.co/2TjbeR8Y1m
@RickLangel @LauraRBelin @IAGovernor As far as data to suggest that masking is an effective way to reduce transmission, this article does include children in their study for transmission. The study found... https://t.co/dHH0pdrMZe
@Kristen61112998 @adamTHX1138 @Hammbear While kids' masking is less effecient, probaly bc they wear poorer quality masks less well, it still makes a difference. What is often overlooked is that preventing droplets prevents aerosols since, due to evaporation, a % of droplets become aerosols. https://t.co/wFdJBXf2B5
@liberty_92 @GGabrielsquared @ChadWilson2020 @yopasta Weird. This study from 2008 seems to suggest otherwise. https://t.co/5bmgvsKqJA
@Skeptopathy @MarchForScience https://t.co/9VUOGzErqh
@JohnJam45398906 @ianmSC @naomirwolf Your listing of Sande (2008): "Any type of general mask use is likely to decrease viral exposure and infection risk on a population level, in spite of imperfect fit and imperfect adherence" https://t.co/TA0W22TftW Also, Brooks (2021): https://t.co/mowfnF8OuD
@Derick34543626 @paulblanchfiel7 @Heachy_1979 Perhaps not stop, but can reduce the risk. As per the medical science.... https://t.co/YYnMhaMq9c
@jajamjamejames @ScienceShared @sdbaral Try again on those stats. 2.5x10^-6 of the volume is in droplets <10um. What do you think the fraction is for 1um? https://t.co/wkTtQJL6KL And read the literature review here in the introduction. I have no tribe, except for the science. https://t.co/IsS6HJxTiM https://t.co/SELwXbxmuK
@PedalCabby @GovtsTheProblem Because science. Here is the observable evidence (that's what a study is) that even cloth masks work; which is a CORRELATION between mask usage and virus reduction. https://t.co/yaWQRPNK6I
@57414B455550 @whatwouldido1 @MailOnline https://t.co/DGuxRqkUSg
@comicdavecooper Here's one from 2008 in case you think they are all in response to Covid-19. https://t.co/lX3JJtEWpp
@bozalistan @Omardenia @lopus1981b Sí, claro. Le adjunto tres, por si tiene a bien estudiarlos. Espero que no les asigne los calificativos de no fiables o dependientes sólo porque no dicen lo que usted quiere leer. https://t.co/HoDlXVbbQX https://t.co/odrFi1Ri4N https://t.co/ugsgEG5jGA
@Saville1559 @ReformedBroHood @LutheranKlinean @seamuscmacaoidh @TWRjack I’m glad you asked. May this season be a humbling experience, seeing
@WoodenNickelTX @gertdogg @InkysSaltyWife @brittanieshey @MMFlint https://t.co/m8wNiKLt3S
@JBird91223 @Kptz89P @gertdogg @InkysSaltyWife @brittanieshey @MMFlint https://t.co/m8wNiKLt3S
@AdamLoos12 @KristenMeghan @scrowder https://t.co/cEZwaRRvPa
@northerness https://t.co/ImL0tgIhbX van der Sande M, Teunis P, Sabel, R. 2008 Professional and home-made face masks reduce exposure to respiratory infections among the general population. PLoS One (doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002618). ↩
@jack_black_jack @TaylorSvehlak @3legphotography @HopesMom12 @DanRather This kind of science? https://t.co/5Aaimh97mf https://t.co/F9JwZrf0Xz https://t.co/ugUrfDBJis You will not see this, however, as I don't interact with those who can't remain civil during discussion.
https://t.co/6eSnAbSrD3
@musicladyelaine @PaulBar85039345 @SamBraslow @BuzzEdition Masks prevent people of getting infected(it's not 100%, but it's something), with less people getting infected, the chances of his family member getting infected are reduced. Source for the effectiveness of masks: https://t.co/gprZElSoPl
@Marie28880819 @PaulBar85039345 @SamBraslow @BuzzEdition Here, a research article made in 2008, about how masks help prevent the transmission of respiratory infections(Covid-19 spreads similarly) https://t.co/gprZElSoPl
@AnchorsLife @davenewworld_2 Small example proving you're wrong https://t.co/7gcvjWn8vB https://t.co/bWXnOtcjnK https://t.co/5C7Ft2XXNT https://t.co/ndYXAKTOU4 https://t.co/zwTDdHEmrz https://t.co/0aHVgjygZh https://t.co/Vl0m2aGtPd
@Commuter29 @Hamptondener @CovidSenseBloke @tnewtondunn https://t.co/QsNpND9mSY One of many scientific journal articles which support the use of masks in order to reduce respiratory exposure to infectious diseases. There are TONNES of research. Your turn; find me the research that says masks are not effective at all?
@Anika97035386 @heaven_nurse @NoDumbAlliance @OlafGersemann @Natascha_Strobl @welt Wer behauptet muss belegen. Damit du nicht dumm sterben musst: https://t.co/sCA9cWhEcw https://t.co/5AF2UsD5n3 https://t.co/c8vbVTZeGT https://t.co/2cDEDfkpVE https://t.co/UWzi4xryGK
@anatwitje @Esther_Voet https://t.co/jJhkRmwoWQ
@RSocPublishing @EdinburghUni @bandiera_lucia @shu_otomo @fmenolascina @ignaziomariav @SchoolOfEng_UoE RIVM (2008): "Any [...] mask use is likely to decrease viral exposure and infection risk on a population level, in spite of imperfect fit and imperfect adherence, personal respirators providing most protection." https://t.co/NxpmrU9Qzt
@BrendanEich That is to say it seems like mask reduce aerosol exposure (https://t.co/xtlmZX4m0X, https://t.co/DAYXHnVR22, https://t.co/rghKyE3S2r). Reduced exposure = less sick (https://t.co/nsJdbx7EFd), less sick = less stress on hospitals and ideally better care for those in hospitals.
@CryptoVillain_ https://t.co/1M4G6fZZmN
RT @SiccoVanHoegee: Hier het onderzoek dat sinds 2008 stof ligt te vangen bij het RIVM. Professional and Home-Made Face Masks Reduce Expos…
Hier het onderzoek dat sinds 2008 stof ligt te vangen bij het RIVM. Professional and Home-Made Face Masks Reduce Exposure to Respiratory Infections among the General Population /23 #coronadebat https://t.co/TIAmRRD3fK
@LorenCharnley @zorinaq So I'll just pick out a few... the mask use actually has been discussed prior to Corona as being a useful tool for respiratory virus spread reduction mean. Here's an example https://t.co/wdCLdSCS1y /2
@OktayTR57 @OlafGersemann @welt Ist leider Juli....aber 2008...Hilft ihnen das? https://t.co/V4OeCk987I
Hier het onderzoek dat sinds 2008 stof ligt te vangen bij het RIVM. Professional and Home-Made Face Masks Reduce Exposure to Respiratory Infections among the General Population #codezwart https://t.co/TIAmRRD3fK
@carrotbrain @Alexesar23 @KyleHunter @J_GallagherAD3 https://t.co/mrdfdRlv7D
@TeamTrump https://t.co/XelbmtFiUV
@WilliamLBeck1 @SpunkybyChance @CAFinUS @TreeforBoston @CityOfBoston @BostonParksDept https://t.co/IqxOchAD3E
@BadMouthAmerica @neurosys_zero @DavidHikerRN @alexgray718 @BrandonStraka Here, have a research article published in 2008 help you educate yourself. Ya genius. https://t.co/G0LC9NBLMU
RT @SmartAirFilters: I've heard people say surgical masks don't seal tightly at all. Tests on 21 people found average fit effectiveness of…
@NonsenseEnd @kc47059011 Alrighty; cloth masks: -Reduce SARS-CoV-2 inoculum https://t.co/2A1UdSuSv3 -Reduce inward & outward viral exposure: https://t.co/2xkXBNNuj9 -Filter SARS-CoV-2-sized particles: https://t.co/Dbs9kZW8rZ -Filter droplets during speech: https://t.co/XqgiCKGQZK Do you want more, or?
Hier het onderzoek dat sinds 2008 stof ligt te vangen bij het RIVM. Professional and Home-Made Face Masks Reduce Exposure to Respiratory Infections among the General Population /103 https://t.co/eG8RspkKiD
@JarnoSaukkorii1 @marijkuusisto https://t.co/KPhlcoz8D0
@B33Mello @alisonrebecca @carlheneghan @mmjblair @spectator https://t.co/ATJcvQQvQ5 https://t.co/Ig9MAxmuOL https://t.co/1zvDa4Ndm6 there is evidence actually you just don’t want to see it. All these studies show Atleast some benefit to wearing masks. They’re the first to come up on Pubmed.
@brentmoney @therecount https://t.co/zippQJZ7Zk https://t.co/zHCqPSf4hB https://t.co/9BlUNBaPjt https://t.co/6Ksil32A2X https://t.co/KGdyiMUAMi
@MickMcDermott10 @mikeonthemarne @GeorgeMonbiot @CatyUpATree https://t.co/ouQMHzN9kb https://t.co/0KINy2VLPn https://t.co/MdBWpz4s8k https://t.co/ORzsahVDY1 https://t.co/i3R9SAeE9p https://t.co/5XJnRCnTBW https://t.co/ETwmjIFk3D https://t.co/Lps7b5sdiC https://t.co/OjUEGzfWw7
@JnoBS86 Here, a research article. From 2008. https://t.co/G0LC9NBLMU
@Kickingtwig @OrbitOfYourHips @CindyCslund4087 @LouRaguse @kare11 here are two https://t.co/VTAQATqYRu https://t.co/dBNb4DWl3Q
@mariaitapia @pimpicris @SergioEfe https://t.co/rcABzHAAxC
@HarrySnel1 @Koffiegeest @TheoKuypers @Ipie33 @dokterJes @anca_buit @AnnemijnElskamp @NLzorg1 @Nienke010 @rivm https://t.co/lkYmaM27la
@Ritax78 @TheoKuypers @Koffiegeest @Ipie33 @dokterJes @anca_buit @AnnemijnElskamp @NLzorg1 @Nienke010 @rivm https://t.co/lkYmaM27la
@scm6mik @liamsims5 @LozzaFox @JamesDelingpole https://t.co/aUr0UxnRNk best summarised in this article as it's more accessible https://t.co/KZaxc2OMUh
@SheriffFord @liamsims5 @LozzaFox @JamesDelingpole Sorry. It's 90%, not 95%. The scientific study is here https://t.co/aUr0UxnRNk but this excellent article makes it a little more accessible as the study is a bit scientific and stat heavy. https://t.co/KZaxc2OMUh
RT @mariaitapia: 11/ Que a su vez se basa en un artículo que dice: «Las mascarillas FFP2 proporcionaban una protección aproximadamente 50 v…
@Reezyard @Sywert “Any type of general mask use is likely to decrease viral exposure and infection risk on a population level, in spite of imperfect fit and imperfect adherence, personal respirators providing most protection.” https://t.co/8dmbVfLKsF
@CharlotWa @Reezyard @Sywert Ik vond dit paper van het RIVM overigens ook niet onaardig. https://t.co/8dmbVfLKsF
RT @mariaitapia: 11/ Que a su vez se basa en un artículo que dice: «Las mascarillas FFP2 proporcionaban una protección aproximadamente 50 v…
RT @mariaitapia: 11/ Que a su vez se basa en un artículo que dice: «Las mascarillas FFP2 proporcionaban una protección aproximadamente 50 v…
@GefferyMorgan @Frankensteins31 @Reuters This one's peer-reviewed from 2008, albeit on general respiratory infections: "Any type of general mask use is likely to decrease viral exposure and infection risk on a population level, in spite of imperfect fit and imperfect adherence..." https://t.co/1Xyky95yGr
RT @SmartAirFilters: I've heard people say surgical masks don't seal tightly at all. Tests on 21 people found average fit effectiveness of…
I've heard people say surgical masks don't seal tightly at all. Tests on 21 people found average fit effectiveness of 79%--far from perfect, but far better than nothing. https://t.co/hr6X0o5UDr #COVID19 #WHO #PPE https://t.co/XVilUImnwr
RT @FCervantesSodi: https://t.co/3NvCWGWcqU
RT @FCervantesSodi: https://t.co/3NvCWGWcqU
@wakeup89427666 @1ofthesheepdogs @JasonBr15039189 @MartinKulldorff @SWAtlasHoover @goodmanmetrics @democracynow Or this 2008 Dutch study which considered N95-style respirators, surgical masks, and cloth masks and found that they all would reduce exposure to airborne influenza virus in that order. https://t.co/B3q2OiFFut
@IzayaChrome @2ChainPool @wierdduk en dit is ook in lijn met RIVM onderzoeken: https://t.co/1M4G6fZZmN https://t.co/spPyMbTGCy
RT @Kim_D3: @peng_shang @rivm Here is the 2008 study that the @RIVM paid for, they've known all along that face masks work. https://t.co/jH…
@lolwestinghouse @rivm The @rivm funded their own study 12 years ago. They knew about face mask benefits all along. https://t.co/QWDw2COmsl and https://t.co/jHRRLcVhmr
@peng_shang @rivm Here is the 2008 study that the @RIVM paid for, they've known all along that face masks work. https://t.co/jHRRLcVhmr
@suus1619 @Diedhein https://t.co/1M4G6ghAel
@vrijspreker @Diedhein https://t.co/1M4G6ghAel
RT @SiccoVanHoegee: @Gezeurig Ik ga echt gillen. Het onderzoek waar Duitsland haar mondkapjesbeleid op baseert is dus gedaan door arts-ep…
RT @Gezeurig: @lizzyvleeuwen https://t.co/MskOW6uWy9
RT @SiccoVanHoegee: @Gezeurig Ik ga echt gillen. Het onderzoek waar Duitsland haar mondkapjesbeleid op baseert is dus gedaan door arts-ep…
RT @SiccoVanHoegee: @Gezeurig Ik ga echt gillen. Het onderzoek waar Duitsland haar mondkapjesbeleid op baseert is dus gedaan door arts-ep…
RT @SiccoVanHoegee: @Gezeurig Ik ga echt gillen. Het onderzoek waar Duitsland haar mondkapjesbeleid op baseert is dus gedaan door arts-ep…
RT @SiccoVanHoegee: @Gezeurig Ik ga echt gillen. Het onderzoek waar Duitsland haar mondkapjesbeleid op baseert is dus gedaan door arts-ep…
RT @SiccoVanHoegee: @Gezeurig Ik ga echt gillen. Het onderzoek waar Duitsland haar mondkapjesbeleid op baseert is dus gedaan door arts-ep…
RT @SiccoVanHoegee: @Gezeurig Ik ga echt gillen. Het onderzoek waar Duitsland haar mondkapjesbeleid op baseert is dus gedaan door arts-ep…
@Gezeurig Ik ga echt gillen. Het onderzoek waar Duitsland haar mondkapjesbeleid op baseert is dus gedaan door arts-epidemioloog Marianne van der Sande in 2008 TOEN ZE BIJ HET RIVM werkte. Dat zelfde RIVM erkent nu niet haar eigen onderzoek in 2008???
@PatriotismOK @BangoBilly @richardhorton1 Yeah, there's definitely no evidence that masks are in any way effective...except this peer reviewed study from 2008: https://t.co/9z41BnQvzB And this study from April: https://t.co/hSeGCkAQe1 And this Lancet review from June: https://t.co/A2E2uvx7p0
@buckeye_ca @EricTopol @NEJM @Rutherford_UCSF HI Buckeye. Do see this paper- I like it in terms of masking reducing exposure to respiratory viruses...https://t.co/Ci5h6LoNCm
RT @bencowling88: @drannehuang @theNASEM References for mechanistic evidence for the effectiveness of face masks to protect the wearer: htt…
@drannehuang @theNASEM References for mechanistic evidence for the effectiveness of face masks to protect the wearer: https://t.co/XtSjWlnU7v https://t.co/NVoqxZYzSE https://t.co/rjmqOB3pet
@itsallvitriol @ElonBachman
@jasontkachuk @EdWhiteMarkets Here is the entire paper that excerpt references. I am not afraid of GMOs, nor am I afraid of masks. I’m not sure why you are. https://t.co/FqiqvTEZi7
@kaelyada @MatadorDeTakos @PRN92 @Conflits_FR Merci d'arrêter de dire n'importe quoi. Il y a plusieurs articles scientifiques sur l'utilité du masque. S'il est utile dans un bloc opératoire ou le niveau d'exigence est extrêmement élevé, il sera aussi utile en extérieur. https://t.co/oANUwbf70O
@simoarne @MattAgorist @TheFreeThought2 "All types of masks reduced aerosol exposure" https://t.co/oq6KAxNT97
@p_duval @LEV_R3FLEX @Conflits_FR Les masques chirurgicaux (et fait main) protége aussi. Bien que je te l'accorde ce soit moins efficace qu'un FFP2... https://t.co/oANUwbf70O
@transfix @TIFFLS @BrooksKaiser @JimSavell @ASlavitt That evidence is already out of date. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. See below: https://t.co/JVZAOwqNiX https://t.co/tx4bRSfHEI https://t.co/lDTSbaQdsT https://t.co/EaVPUdcSMI https://t.co/k2N6xt2yPC And here's one from 2008... https://t.co/ZviWeHpJR4
@ArazHajiyev1 @JonStanich @CoronaPogue @dense_evi @mail_celal @daniellevitt22 "A 2008 Dutch study considered N95-style respirators, surgical masks, and cloth masks and found that they all would reduce exposure to airborne influenza virus in that order." https://t.co/B3q2OiFFut
RT @SantiagoPCh03: @rlscottrl @MrMike27549486 @catturd2 @BernieSanders https://t.co/nrtUpBrGCl https://t.co/RR6NcjIrfF https://t.co/J6Bzx…
@rlscottrl @MrMike27549486 @catturd2 @BernieSanders https://t.co/nrtUpBrGCl https://t.co/RR6NcjIrfF https://t.co/J6BzxPKkbJ “Nobody has done that” Make sure to do your own research before making a claim like that, these are only a few of the many studies which show the effectiveness of face masks.
@ME_Valentijn @NOS @rivm @MinPres There is also this other one from 2008 by Marianne van der Sande (at the time RIVM). Note that it says “respiratory infections”, not “just” influenza. https://t.co/YKEfEJPm8N
@fundee @Tiffanie_Fisher @jenforhoboken @RaviBhalla So there’s this: https://t.co/ryPiQeUNmU And this: https://t.co/V5s5j34x80 And this: https://t.co/o9XsrjE60b
@gbronkhorst And albeit related to influenza, RIVM own risk analysis from 2010 https://t.co/FGh879izVI or their own study from 2008 https://t.co/YKEfEJPm8N
https://t.co/zannyakM7I https://t.co/Nw5gCuELr3 https://t.co/jXKqt4ngGH https://t.co/C1SjRh222v
@camillalong But there is clear evidence for home masks reducing exposure to infection, you just did not look at it before writing. https://t.co/94ZmdVpNnY
@Restore2012 @BrendenD77 @AiyukLouiv @KyleT23 @Breaking911 https://t.co/MU9aZS34OT
@JanisiaPenn Plenty of studies showing just plain cloth is more effective than nothing at all. I wear a mask in crowded indoor public spaces the same reason I carry a gun...to protect myself. This shouldn't be hard to understand. https://t.co/ivBhns2wT8 https://t.co/z0obujgGou
#6 is my absolute favorite. A graphic with no scientific backing saying there’s no scientific studies about masks. Here’s 5 studies I found in 2 minutes: https://t.co/tbKH0Dm1QO https://t.co/yq31MAJ2Ji https://t.co/myYJZs6x9Y https://t.co/29BPZOwBNT https://t.co/8krmcpWGma https://t.co/HcSSsypvd3
@JonathanFalcons @Breaking911 https://t.co/MU9aZS34OT
@Zigmanfreud @AlexBerenson https://t.co/Hi5dGUzzt2 https://t.co/SZdnfiYcnZ https://t.co/izMUTL9j7y I get it...you don't like liberals/democrats. Regardless, you need to dissolve these obvious biases as they appear to be poisoning your reasoning faculties. It's okay, I'm here to feed you, baby bird. ;)
@Alf_ArGzz @IrvingGatell @microBIOblog @ZulmaCucunuba @bioamara @jmmulet Bueno, no se de que me sorprende en España el epidemiólogo que asesora al Gobierno ha dicho cosas similares y ha pasado de negar la eficacia del uso de la mascarilla durante 2 meses a imponer su uso en la nueva normalidad. Decía que no había estudios antes https://t.co/Wda8pmvIY5
@londonnw10Brent @lynnBdalton @campbellclaret Non-surgical masks were already known to be effective. https://t.co/hGIeKzH2Xg https://t.co/1eUui7BPMR
@mjgranger1 @gkemonster @NYGovCuomo @WHO https://t.co/MU9aZSkFGr https://t.co/sLmp2P0Wrx
@PrimeTimeCapit1 @Fanboynchumchu1 @hooliganmomm @Alyssa_Milano https://t.co/MU9aZS34OT
@KaptainsteveT https://t.co/fe0x639brh https://t.co/CtPpBt2pAN https://t.co/JIOhihQ22l https://t.co/WXAEahXDRM https://t.co/AQOoKxdoCj
@killer_bhree @CassieFambro @2sloppy2joe @_pezzano @nypost https://t.co/MU9aZS34OT
Después de 269.000 personas infectadas y 26.000 fallecidos @desdelamoncloa y @sanidadgob se plantea poner obligatorio el uso de mascarilla 2 meses después. Dirán que el criterio científico a cambiado: Artículo del 2008 Gripe-mascarilla: https://t.co/Wda8pmvIY5 https://t.co/wDe1H5W1SF
@Jmaj101 @FrankBecerra14 @MustardSeedish @ABC7 Masks are almost universally deemed as helpful (unless you can’t learn to use them right. The only thing controversial is whether or not they are protective enough for the healthcare workers. https://t.co/eNNj2mGC54
@frankiep @tony_zy @ofarry @Forbes https://t.co/97KQRWcjby
@Marie_Leila3 @DocArnica @delfenix72 @docdu16 Un masque fait main est sans doute moins filtrant qu'un masque chirurgical. Toutefois, on est quand même protéger même si c'est moins qu'un chirurgical ou qu'un FFP2. Deux études scientifiques le montrent: https://t.co/oANUwbf70O
@johndo55480154 @thesweetracoon @BeaulieuBap @Hoe_No_ Un autre article scientifique qui montre que ça a une utilité d'en porter un, même fait maison : https://t.co/oANUwbf70O
@realjuliasong https://t.co/MU9aZS34OT
@Vialaxy @Nears_ @CaptivaLeica @Conflits_FR @ClementLanot C'est mieux que tout le monde en porte effectivement... Pour les masques "home-made" 2 publis et même conclusion : "All types of masks reduced aerosol exposure"/ "better than no protection" https://t.co/SPmTuFGgAi https://t.co/oANUwbf70O
Professional and Home-Made Face Masks Reduce Exposure to Respiratory Infections Among the General Population - PubMed. Maskers helpen tegen verspreiding respiratoire virussen volgens onderzoek RIVM 2008 @LodewijkA https://t.co/05P8xhzbE8
RT @olliruth: @MaaritLeinonen @MattiMuukkonen Any type of general mask use is likely to decrease viral exposure and infection risk on a pop…
@taskivei @ivanpuopolo Tutkimuksen mukaan kaikentyyppiset maskit vähentävät viruksille altistumista ja infektioriskiä. "Any type of general mask use is likely to decrease viral exposure and infection risk on a population level" https://t.co/3pauwoqs5j
@MaaritLeinonen @MattiMuukkonen Any type of general mask use is likely to decrease viral exposure and infection risk on a population level https://t.co/3pauwoqs5j
@AnnaRotkirch @Sukkola @THLorg @mapetti Tässä esim yksi tutkimus https://t.co/W1eIZQ3Nrq
@JuliusMkinen @JoonasKiviranta @OskuTorro @MikaelJungner Tässä nyt esim yksi tutkimus https://t.co/W1eIZQ3Nrq
@PasiVirtala @Jrvinen_J Muuten https://t.co/xpRiUUIfes Muuten, maskitkin on tutkittu, ja ne suojaa.. mutta hei, onhan se parempinettä ihmiset sairastuvat turhaan kuollen ja invalidisoituen. Kunhan on ohjeet viranomaiselta, väliäkö ohjeiden totuudenmukaisuudesta.
RT @olliruth: On aika outoa, että STM pitää vieläkin kiinni maskien tarpeettomuudesta tai jopa haitallisuudesta. Koska niitä ei ole tarpeek…
On aika outoa, että STM pitää vieläkin kiinni maskien tarpeettomuudesta tai jopa haitallisuudesta. Koska niitä ei ole tarpeeksi saatavilla? "Any type of general mask use is likely to decrease viral exposure and infection risk on a population level" https://t.co/3pauwoqs5j
die relevant zijn voor welk masker je moet gebruiken: https://t.co/kFOVconImw In 2008 kwamen Nederlandse onderzoekers al tot de conclusie dat chirurgische mondkapjes minder bescherming bieden tegen een griepvirus dan filterende maskers, maar wel wat https://t.co/e95CwOkwtw
RT @VanJonez: @MarkFrancis228 @Espcoffee8 @SteveinKW @Qualifyfor “Any type of general mask use is likely to decrease viral exposure and inf…
@MarkFrancis228 @Espcoffee8 @SteveinKW @Qualifyfor “Any type of general mask use is likely to decrease viral exposure and infection risk on a population level”. Can’t we just err on the side of caution and agree that masks are a net benefit. Instead of arguing this point, focus on educating proper use. https://t.co/Vb9eHpVrhD
RT @broddy_: @lovenursingmery @jmmorang @Jlgurquiza @Chemartenerife @Chefiasturias @charo_79 @chuchencio @AntonioCanoEnf @JonathanCaro_ @En…
@lovenursingmery @jmmorang @Jlgurquiza @Chemartenerife @Chefiasturias @charo_79 @chuchencio @AntonioCanoEnf @JonathanCaro_ @EnfermeroNinja Hay poco al respecto. Lo que hay, está estudiado en gripe o SARS. Aquí un ejemplo por si sirve https://t.co/2pVwwrjmpj
RT @jjmiphoto: @VladimirKPolo @donderisja @jaimeraulmolina Lea, aquí está. https://t.co/kkdJHCKw6I
@VladimirKPolo @donderisja @jaimeraulmolina Lea, aquí está. https://t.co/kkdJHCKw6I
@masque242 https://t.co/iZWYPNlnvM
@lamsonlinshen https://t.co/iZWYPNlnvM
@Crocodillia12 https://t.co/iZWYPNlnvM
@ThomasBeautyy https://t.co/iZWYPNlnvM
@RKJ65 @realDonaldTrump https://t.co/iZWYPNlnvM
@jenheemstra https://t.co/iZWYPNlnvM
@FinancialTimes https://t.co/iZWYPN3MEe
@valcano https://t.co/iZWYPNlnvM
@artofmmignola https://t.co/iZWYPNlnvM
@nard_nigeria https://t.co/iZWYPNlnvM
@ValaAfshar https://t.co/iZWYPNlnvM
@GregAbbott_TX Make home made face masks. Save N95 for healthcare workers. https://t.co/iZWYPNlnvM
@AlexPanchenko2 Science is real. Research just completed. Wear a face mask & still maintain social distancing. keep 2 metres away. The Surgeon General Jerome Adams has a video to make a bandana face mask! Kinda backflipped to keep precious N95 masks for healthcare. https://t.co/iZWYPNlnvM
@judy_chevalier @nkagetsu @Jabaluck @NAChristakis @thehowie @Yale @EconTalker Good point here by Judy, and noone is claiming that these are anywhere equivalent to N95s but enough evidence to say that they can be helpful at the margin: https://t.co/pv4XRRtkAe also other peer reviewed research indicating some value here: https://t.co/XZrrIYbWzB
@wanabefifi @beltrandelrio Bien Beltrán, la información científica cada día es más y de mayor calidad. Cada día sabemos más acerca del virus. La comunidad médica que está actualizada, apoyamos su uso. Soy otorrino https://t.co/3TCvfJCIzF https://t.co/2icdEhpcdA
Acerca de distintos tipos de mascarillas y su efectividad. Si no puedes conseguir las adecuadas, las caras son mejor que nada. https://t.co/wksWBzhB05
https://t.co/wksWBzhB05
RT @sagleyos: @AniGarzonPortil @patricio_javi @EstebanOrtizMD Este estudio dice que si retienen algunos droplets. Y ante la situacion de em…