Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The overall discussion reflects strong agreement with the article, as users frequently mention the variability in pelvic anatomy and its effect on measurement reliability, using words like 'unreliable,' 'variance,' and 'no agreement.' The tone is clinical yet critical, with some posts expressing frustration about current assessment methods and their limitations, indicating that the article challenges traditional practices with substantial implications.
Most discussions emphasize the unreliability of assessing anterior pelvic tilt due to anatomical variability, strongly supporting the publication's findings.
Participants show moderate interest, often referencing clinical implications and reliability issues, but some brief mentions suggest lower engagement.
The comments include specific critiques and calls for better understanding of pelvic anatomy, indicating a moderate level of thoughtful engagement.
The discussions highlight significant concerns about clinical assessments and measurement validity, suggesting high impact on practice awareness.
Just the annual reminder that anatomical landmarks vary between people This tells us nothing more than that Variation in pelvic morphology may prevent the identification of anterior pelvic tilt https://t.co/Lm4CQIvH1T https://t.co/JGHQJGHtDo
But yet again these tests lack any accuracy or reliability to assess anterior pelvic tilt due to wide anatomical variations of these bony landmarks from person to person! https://t.co/L1vQNRIp4d
@roguepanda23 @Conor_Harris_ @kinesigen Actually the evidence says all therapists cant reliably assess degrees pelvic tilt Christian https://t.co/L1vQNRZZVL And I do think the words fascia and biotensegrity are said by ignorant therapists who lack full understanding of the complexity of pain and pathology!
The other issue with APT is there is no agreement on what is too much or too little! And there is also no reliability in our clinical ability to assess who does or doesn’t have it! https://t.co/L1vQNRIp4d https://t.co/az1sJWMn1R
Also therapists are really really bad at assessing who has more or less anterior pelvic tilt due to the high variability in the pelvic bony landmarks often used… https://t.co/L1vQNRIWTL
@lizbayleyphysio @Jordan_theCoach First, assessing and measuring pelvic anterior tilt is really unreliable due to high variation in positions of landmarks https://t.co/L1vQNRIp4d
This video reviews research on anterior pelvic tilt and lower cross syndrome concerning low back pain, including diagnosis, associations with spinal curves, and the role of hip and back muscle tightness and weakness.
Also therapists are really really bad at assessing who has more or less anterior pelvic tilt due to the high variability in the pelvic bony landmarks often used… https://t.co/L1vQNRIWTL
Just the annual reminder that anatomical landmarks vary between people This tells us nothing more than that Variation in pelvic morphology may prevent the identification of anterior pelvic tilt https://t.co/Lm4CQIvH1T https://t.co/JGHQJGHtDo
The other issue with APT is there is no agreement on what is too much or too little! And there is also no reliability in our clinical ability to assess who does or doesn’t have it! https://t.co/L1vQNRIp4d https://t.co/az1sJWMn1R
@roguepanda23 @Conor_Harris_ @kinesigen Actually the evidence says all therapists cant reliably assess degrees pelvic tilt Christian https://t.co/L1vQNRZZVL And I do think the words fascia and biotensegrity are said by ignorant therapists who lack full understanding of the complexity of pain and pathology!
RT @AdamMeakins: But yet again these tests lack any accuracy or reliability to assess anterior pelvic tilt due to wide anatomical variation…
RT @AdamMeakins: But yet again these tests lack any accuracy or reliability to assess anterior pelvic tilt due to wide anatomical variation…
But yet again these tests lack any accuracy or reliability to assess anterior pelvic tilt due to wide anatomical variations of these bony landmarks from person to person! https://t.co/L1vQNRIp4d
Variation in pelvic morphology may prevent the identification of anterior pelvic tilt. - PubMed - NCBI https://t.co/O9SScG8FVI
Check out the full studies here
Then for assessing for anterior pelvic tilt… well, there’s a lot of variation in the anatomy of the pelvis between individuals and groups. So this isn’t a very reliable method. https://t.co/iagiOsQ0wy
@lizbayleyphysio @Jordan_theCoach First, assessing and measuring pelvic anterior tilt is really unreliable due to high variation in positions of landmarks https://t.co/L1vQNRIp4d
BC
TP
TS
PG
WL
PP
MB