Rev Recent Clin Trials September 2009 PMID 20028328

Chia (Salvia hispanica): a systematic review by the natural standard research collaboration.

Catherine Ulbricht, Wendy Chao, Katie Nummy, Erica Rusie, Shaina Tanguay-Colucci, Carmen M Iannuzzi, Jeena B Plammoottil, Minney Varghese, Wendy Weissner

Download social card

Mentions

6
Peak: 2 in Aug 2020
across 3 sources since Aug 2020

Extended reach

2,846
potential audience

Total likes

52

Video views

2,306

Mentions per month

Aug 2020 – Sep 2025

Where it's discussed

  • X / Twitter2 posts
  • YouTube2 videos
  • News2 articles

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The social discussions reflect a neutral attitude towards the publication, with users mostly acknowledging the review without expressing strong agreement or excitement. The inclusion of casual mentions and brief comments indicates a surface-level engagement, highlighting moderate interest but minimal impact on their perspectives.

AgreementNeither agree nor disagree

The discussions do not show strong disagreement or strong support, indicating a neutral stance towards the review's findings.

InterestModerate interest

The posts express moderate curiosity about chia's health effects, but lack strong enthusiasm or skepticism.

EngagementNeutral engagement

Post interactions are minimal, with limited depth or detailed analysis, suggesting superficial exchange.

ImpactNeutral impact

The conversations seem to have little influence on broader views or practices, reflecting limited perceived importance.

Abstract in brief

  • The review assesses the scientific evidence on chia (Salvia hispanica), including its history, effects, dosing, interactions, and safety, by analyzing data from multiple sources without language or quality restrictions.
  • Current studies suggest that chia may have potential benefits for conditions like allergies, cardiovascular health, and antioxidant effects, but the evidence is limited and mostly preliminary.
  • Overall, there is limited clinical proof supporting chia's effectiveness for health benefits, and more rigorous research is needed to confirm its role in disease treatment or prevention, despite its historical safety in nonallergic individuals.

Top posts

Most liked on X and Bluesky
نائف الثبيتي
@nayf2013m · X

@tabeebi123 @RGNTcDpyzZEjICw https://t.co/h2RlxpD2B9 https://t.co/hwL3OTk1pr

Aug 6, 2020 · 1 like · 1 share · 265 followers View post →
M.
@mmemmm65 · X

RT @nayf2013m: @tabeebi123 @RGNTcDpyzZEjICw https://t.co/h2RlxpD2B9 https://t.co/hwL3OTk1pr

Aug 7, 2020 · 1 share · 272 followers View post →

All mentions

M.
@mmemmm65 · X

RT @nayf2013m: @tabeebi123 @RGNTcDpyzZEjICw https://t.co/h2RlxpD2B9 https://t.co/hwL3OTk1pr

Aug 7, 2020 · 1 share · 272 followers View post →
نائف الثبيتي
@nayf2013m · X

@tabeebi123 @RGNTcDpyzZEjICw https://t.co/h2RlxpD2B9 https://t.co/hwL3OTk1pr

Aug 6, 2020 · 1 like · 1 share · 265 followers View post →