@ExOncTc @nccmt 9/10 Finally: Evaluate and report on traditional patient level-outcomes (PA, QoL, fitness etc) but also
Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda.
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
Sep 2019 – May 2025Where it's discussed
-
X / Twitter15 posts
-
Blogs6 articles
-
YouTube3 videos
-
Facebook2 posts
-
News2 articles
-
Bluesky1 posts
AI synopsis
What people are saying
Discussions reflect a strong interest and engagement with the article's emphasis on definition and measurement of implementation outcomes, using technical language and referencing frameworks like RE-AIM and PRECEDE-PROCEED to illustrate key points. The tone suggests recognition of its significance for advancing health services research, pointing to its potential to improve implementation strategies.
Many discussions recognize the importance of the publication's focus on conceptual distinctions and measurement in implementation research, showing general support.
Posts demonstrate high interest by referencing frameworks like RE-AIM and PRECEDE-PROCEED, and by discussing measurement challenges and research agendas.
Participants deepen the conversation by mentioning specific frameworks, research challenges, and citing examples like measuring implementation fidelity.
The discussions highlight that the publication influences ongoing research practices and emphasizes the need for better measurement strategies, though the immediate impact appears moderate.
Abstract in brief
- The paper highlights a key issue in implementation research: how to define and measure what "successful implementation" really means, proposing a set of eight specific outcomes such as acceptability, adoption, feasibility, and sustainability to better evaluate success.
- It introduces a taxonomy of these eight implementation outcomes along with their definitions to help clarify and differentiate them from service and clinical outcomes.
- The authors suggest a research agenda focused on improving the conceptualization and measurement of these outcomes, which will improve understanding, efficiency, and the ability to compare different implementation strategies.]
Top posts
Most liked on X and Bluesky実装アウトカム 新しい治療、プラクティス、サービスを実装するための意図的な行動の効果を測定する指標。 Proctorらは、受容性、実施可能性、採用、浸透度、適切性、費用、忠実度、持続可能性の8つの実装アウトカムを提唱。 https://t.co/VvMfGGCWP1
@EddieIglesia @EpiEllie @byron_powell @bjweiner Thanks for thinking of me! @EkpProctor’s pp on implementation outcomes may be useful in helping you think about whether you’re interested in a program’s implementation and/or its effect on service outcomes/processes or on client outcomes https://t.co/BHvOLqpIzX
@sbroderfingert @ImplementCollab (1) https://t.co/ABcoAuLD9c (@enola_proctor) (2) https://t.co/pJqKbfFUdu (@byron_powell) (3) https://t.co/cbAEwMNcG9 (@CaraCLewis) #impsci
@TELLlab @tiffanyphogan @PamelaSnow2 @NathanielRSwain @botting_nikki @Suze_Freogirl @SusanEbbels @lfinestack @hstorkel @mcgregor_karla @larchiba6 @ASHAWeb @Nat_Douglas @AcademyHealth @MarkSBauerMD @byron_powell @enola_proctor @LJDamschroder @JoannKirchner And we have to report our outcomes consistently. Thanks, @enola_proctor ! https://t.co/LDt0y4Butc
Understanding the distinction between intervention failure & implementation failure: Proctor et al 2011 Outcomes for Implementation Research: Conceptual Distinctions, Measurement Challenges, and Research Agenda via @dr_know https://t.co/hhvHkxgQYz
All mentions
Fear of Death and Its Impact on Orochimaru's Transformation in Naruto
This video explores how the fear of death influences Orochimaru's character development, examining psychological aspects within the Naruto series and the broader implications of mortality fears on behavior and identity.
Understanding Common Misconceptions in REAIM and PRISM Frameworks
Drs Russ Glasgow and Samantha Harden discuss misconceptions about REAIM and PRISM domains, providing resources and clarifications to improve understanding in implementation research.
Understanding Implementation Science Outcomes and Measurement Challenges
This episode features Bryan Weiner discussing the history of implementation science, measurement, and key issues like the Jingle Jangle Fallacy. The conversation includes insights on defining and measuring successful…
Outcomes for Implementation Research: Conceptual Distinctions, Measurement Challenges, and Research Agenda from Enola Proctor et al 2011 link.springer.com/article/10.1...
実装アウトカム 新しい治療、プラクティス、サービスを実装するための意図的な行動の効果を測定する指標。 Proctorらは、受容性、実施可能性、採用、浸透度、適切性、費用、忠実度、持続可能性の8つの実装アウトカムを提唱。 https://t.co/VvMfGGCWP1
評価フレームワーク: 実装の成功を判断するため、評価できる実装の指標を提示。 RE-AIM、PRECEDE-PROCEEDは公衆衛生から出てきたもの。Proctorは、8つの実装アウトカムを提示。これまでの4つの分類であげたTMFも評価に用いることが可能。 実装アウトカムフレームワーク https://t.co/VvMfGGCWP1
Understanding the distinction between intervention failure & implementation failure: Proctor et al 2011 Outcomes for Implementation Research: Conceptual Distinctions, Measurement Challenges, and Research Agenda via @dr_know https://t.co/hhvHkxgQYz
@QueenBeeChange @JSchleiderPhD Proctor et al. note that, “the foremost challenge [to disseminating EBPs] may be measuring implementation fidelity quickly and efficiently," which our team at Lyssn are day-in-day-out working to address. https://t.co/4pCFrryFE4
We also assessed each service based on the implementation research framework. [4/8] https://t.co/pUvpLbQabz
Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda https://t.co/rL01PC7lEo
@EddieIglesia @EpiEllie @byron_powell @bjweiner Thanks for thinking of me! @EkpProctor’s pp on implementation outcomes may be useful in helping you think about whether you’re interested in a program’s implementation and/or its effect on service outcomes/processes or on client outcomes https://t.co/BHvOLqpIzX
@TELLlab @tiffanyphogan @PamelaSnow2 @NathanielRSwain @botting_nikki @Suze_Freogirl @SusanEbbels @lfinestack @hstorkel @mcgregor_karla @larchiba6 @ASHAWeb @Nat_Douglas @AcademyHealth @MarkSBauerMD @byron_powell @enola_proctor @LJDamschroder @JoannKirchner And we have to report our outcomes consistently. Thanks, @enola_proctor ! https://t.co/LDt0y4Butc
Outcomes for implementation is a big gap in the health services https://t.co/PaTJ5waesx
RT @sarah_ns_phd: @ExOncTc @nccmt 9/10 Finally: Evaluate and report on traditional patient level-outcomes (PA, QoL, fitness etc) but also
RT @sarah_ns_phd: @ExOncTc @nccmt 9/10 Finally: Evaluate and report on traditional patient level-outcomes (PA, QoL, fitness etc) but also
@ExOncTc @nccmt 9/10 Finally: Evaluate and report on traditional patient level-outcomes (PA, QoL, fitness etc) but also
No need to say that then I walk my way through @enola_proctor et al framework https://t.co/UyLKjJOMk4 4/
RT @Aaron_Lyon: @sbroderfingert @ImplementCollab (1) https://t.co/ABcoAuLD9c (@enola_proctor) (2) https://t.co/pJqKbfFUdu (@byron_powell)…
@sbroderfingert @ImplementCollab (1) https://t.co/ABcoAuLD9c (@enola_proctor) (2) https://t.co/pJqKbfFUdu (@byron_powell) (3) https://t.co/cbAEwMNcG9 (@CaraCLewis) #impsci