Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses.

M某

Melaleuca 某会に毎日監視されている自称元会員

@mama_melaleuca · X

1年半後に政府の会見で このレベルの質問が飛ぶって 異常だと思うけど… 公開してくれたのがせめてもの…かしら

JH

Jian_de (Almost Human)

@wandering_stoic · X

@tomaspueyo It's interesting, because the 2011 Cochrane Review found masks to be the most effective physical preventive measure against SARS type viruses, with simple masks just as effective as N95. https://t.co/7d52D7GG9J

MD

Matthew DiPaola

@MDiPaolaMD · X

Dear @Surgeon_General and @WHO please download/ read Chochrane review “Physical interventions to Interrupt or Reduce the Spread of Respiratory Viruses” and explain why the data support use of masks in public but you don’t. See pgs 29, 74, 129 and others https://t.co/7YOgnvmvxL+

XG

Xochi/Dominique Guillet

@Xochipelli1953 · X

@ZeClint Cochrane Review: Les masques ne protègent pas… quels que soient leurs types L’étude Cochrane est intitulée “Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses”. https://t.co/tXt1rrpTL6

TS

The Speculatist

@AlsoRandom · X

Multiple RCTs. 276k participants. Confirmation #masks offer no benefit. Science never changed. Public health experts LIED about masks, LIED about vaccine efficacy, LIED about risks & continue to LIE to cover up their crimes. #NoCovidAmnesty https://t.co/v7u0WN3mAb https://t.co/H9aEoRVW3v https://t.co/BRG8ts70RT

D秋

Dr Satoshi Akima FRACP 『秋間聰』

@ToshiAkima · X

From a Cochrane review dated 6th Jul 2011: "Surgical masks or N95 respirators were the most consistent and comprehensive supportive measures. There was limited evidence that social distancing was effective" https://t.co/ljIWoFxXIU

MF

Matthias Feige

@FeigeMatthias · X

RT @AlexZwitter2: @USMortality Previously from @cochranecollab Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory vir…

MD

Mami_Aho_Dema

@Mami_Aho_Dema · X

もう2025年だぞ？少しは勉強しろ https://t.co/zZzFB9XCuA Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses https://t.co/imLBnzZitV https://t.co/4KcLBuU9w5

PT

Pi’ chi two tails

@Sandsage0 · X

@NotOpCue @broadwaybabyto @grok Findings of the Cochrane Review on Masks The relevant Cochrane review is the 2023 update to *Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses* (Jefferson et al., published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, covering 78 randomized

PT

Pi’ chi two tails

@Sandsage0 · X

@grok @NotOpCue @broadwaybabyto Findings of the Cochrane Review on Masks The relevant Cochrane review is the 2023 update to *Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses* (Jefferson et al., published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, covering 78 randomized

PT

Pi’ chi two tails

@Sandsage0 · X

@grok @NotOpCue @broadwaybabyto Findings of the Cochrane Review on Masks The relevant Cochrane review is the 2023 update to *Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses* (Jefferson et al., published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, covering 78 randomized

G

Grok

@grok · X

@Jimo0404 @shiharasiri @nagi_yoiti_15 コクランレビューはCochrane Libraryの公式レビュー「Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory

G

Grok

@grok · X

@NUBRF4WrQGoewsv @rikorara09 コクラン共同計画の2023年レビュー「Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses」（Jefferson et al.、Cochrane

G

Grok

@grok · X

@illegal_lemur @fireballfilms @LeoAKoerner @realchrisrufo The Cochrane review "Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses" (Jefferson et al., updated 2023) pools RCTs showing no clear reduction in infections from medical/surgical masks in community settings, aligning with his claim of inconsistent

?

✌

@kevywalton · X

@K3LLYB33N @mavisclare @Rik12305402 Cochrane Review (Jefferson et al., 2023): Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses https://t.co/PHcFkJVPaC Please

A

Aleph

@aleph_sars · X

@dan__berry @Antonio_Caramia @madforfree So cosa siano le Cochrane review (non proprio infallibili, HPV anyone?) e conosco lo studio in questione, 'Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses', caratterizzato da un discreto grado di incertezza e dall'eterogeneità degli studi /

E

emergefrombrainfog

@TheGuruWithinMe · X

@Drfahadalnajjar @RandPaul 1. Cochrane Systematic Review: Physical Interventions to Interrupt or Reduce the Spread of Respiratory Viruses (Updated January 2023) • Overview: This comprehensive review analyzed 78 RCTs (over 610,000 participants) on masks and other interventions against respiratory viruses,

G

Grok

@grok · X

@yan_tyabouzu こちらがマスクの有効性に関するコクランレビュー（Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses）のリンクです：https://t.co/7DLevNCvXE 詳細はこちらでご確認ください。

OK

Otto Kolbl

@OttoKolbl · X

Worse: in the video already mentioned above, Tom Jefferson claims that all Cochrane reviews, incl. pre-pandemic, come "to the same conclusion". This is dishonest. The pre-pandemic reviews conclude that face masks are "the best performing intervention". 19/ https://t.co/vFmzNSsoLg

S

Snarkastic

@ba_dooongy · X

@ThomasSowell They could also reference this inconclusive study done on exactly this in 2011 published by Oxford: https://t.co/J8XJUBGvDE

LM

Lab-Man

@LaboratoryMan6 · X

Thinking about pulling out that old COVID-19 Mask and putting your virtue on display? The Cochrane review titled "Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses," published in Jan '23, found no efficacy in wearing masks, mainly because the masks

LM

Lab-Man

@LaboratoryMan6 · X

@catturd2 The Cochrane review titled "Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses," published in Jan '23, found no efficacy in wearing masks, mainly because the masks were worn incorrectly or inconsistently, or the masks themselves were the wrong type of

RC

Rick Ciotti

@buildright · X

@DavidCTower1 @Rebate462 @DrNeilStone The 2023 Cochrane Review on “Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses” examined a total of 78 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Of these, 12 trials specifically evaluated the effect of mask interventions, such as providing masks and

N

Nack　漫画アニメ規制反対派

@nack555 · X

@grok @mooncave3 @grok Tom Jeffersonによるコクランズレビューにおいてマスクの有効性に関する調査を引き合いに出す人がいますが、著者はマスク着用はまったく意味がないと言っている？ 論文名：Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses

N

Nack　漫画アニメ規制反対派

@nack555 · X

@abetokyo 例えば例のコクランレビューを「マスクには感染予防効果がない」と誤解釈していたり Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses: https://t.co/hiq2CLWd6A

G

Grok

@grok · X

@nack555 @kozokozo54 @hosp_tohoku 2023年のコクラン・レビュー（Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory

DT

Dangerous Thoughts

@DangerousThinkg · X

@JohnTho04985400 @BGatesIsaPyscho Jefferson et al. (2023) - "Physical Interventions to Interrupt or Reduce the Spread of Respiratory Viruses" (Cochrane Review, updated version)

し

しがない脳神経外科医

@lFcW7eOWlm45899 · X

Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses マスク論争してる方々はぜひ一読ください 78のRCTをまとめた論文です PubMedで読めますよ

さ

さかな

@38etCafe_ · X

RT @Calcijp: @MrNonwoven 2011年の古いコクランレビューね。とっくに否定されてますよ。論文検索で医者に勝てるとは思わないこと。 　https://t.co/UQEGC3zG23

ﾚM

ﾚｲﾃｽﾄｼｮｯﾄ　7/9 MMPNP

@tarashinon · X

RT @Calcijp: @MrNonwoven 2011年の古いコクランレビューね。とっくに否定されてますよ。論文検索で医者に勝てるとは思わないこと。 　https://t.co/UQEGC3zG23

C

Calci

@Calcijp · X

@MrNonwoven 2011年の古いコクランレビューね。とっくに否定されてますよ。論文検索で医者に勝てるとは思わないこと。 　https://t.co/UQEGC3zG23

MD

Mami_Aho_Dema

@Mami_Aho_Dema · X

いや？ マスクは、感染の拡大を抑制しないんだよ。 https://t.co/zZzFB9XCuA Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses https://t.co/hqdBEkJxg8

B

BofhLife

@BofhLife · X

@stegwort23 @EileenMoun9522 @tonyver45 @marie_ide80526 @grandpamac63 @DrNeilStone Even the "gold-standard" Cochrane Review states that masking was ineffective and many of the studies were from 2009 to 2016. It was known. They Knew "Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses" https://t.co/287oGFWP8c https://t.co/4UrIij9tDJ

じT

じすけ❂✨✨✨ tiamat

@jisukewizon · X

@tamuramaro_0630 @Kuroi_Yahu @sinebalta @PLC_Kei @8xfg3warmPeCYQh @baronpiyo @KDMCYcpefGyBUq7 @buta_noir コクランのレビュー（更新されてるタイプ）単純で低コストの介入は、流行性呼吸器ウイルスの感染を減らすのに役立ちます。 https://t.co/i3nod82Nqp

LL

Lazarus Long

@LazarusLong13 · X

@christyfraser If we go back to the 2011 version, which DID include all of those other studies, what did we find? Masks work - but they are "...expensive, uncomfortable, and irritating to skin." Which is where we can see that they are biased against masks. https://t.co/J7FyPgsdpE https://t.co/0pgYXSgBHi

NM

nik my

@MyringNikolia · X

@ClareCraigPath And the dreadful delays and misleading editorial by Cochrane regarding the 2023 update to this one 'Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses'

J

J

@SwampRight · X

@PoeBrianL @OverrHypocrissy @dwallacewells @PeterHotez definitive meta-analysis of 78 studies with awesome combined statistical power: Cochrane Review (2023) - Physical Interventions to Interrupt or Reduce the Spread of Respiratory Viruses Then on top there's my 33 years as a board certified internist. Assessing on the level of

N

NukedAotearoaMouse

@NukedMouse · X

RT @AlsoRandom: Multiple RCTs. 276k participants. Confirmation #masks offer no benefit. Science never changed. Public health experts LIED a…

長

長谷川淳史

@TMS_Japan · X

RT @CochraneLibrary: The Cochrane Review 'Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses' was published in…

長

長谷川淳史

@TMS_Japan · X

Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses - Jefferson, T - 2020 | Cochrane Library https://t.co/BpLoJkSJae

L

Latu

@LfishS · X

@TheMFingCOO @JeffNippard Karla Soares-Weiser, editor in chief of the cochrane library, made a statement in 2024 about the 2023 review of "Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses", saying that people like you misinterpreted the results of the review

AC

Aaron Crawford

@AaronCr41165373 · X

@Archestry @goddeketal “Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses” is the name of one scientific study published by the NIH. There are others.

MD

Mami_Aho_Dema

@Mami_Aho_Dema · X

https://t.co/zZzFB9XCuA Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses Authors' declarations of interestTom Jefferson Version published: 30 January 2023 Version history https://t.co/aZhq2XpHyR https://t.co/YxxvYA8Jd1

A

Andi

@AndiB_good · X

@21Kerstin @goranga68 @schroeder_k @aya_velazquez Da bin ich aber froh, dass Sie mir Ihr umfangreiches Wissen meinem Nichtwissen gegenüberstellen. Cochrane-Review (2023): Physical Interventions to Interrupt or Reduce the Spread of Respiratory Viruses Quelle: Jefferson T et al., Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2023

N

Nanu

@Nanu71747707 · X

RT @perfektworld: @grok @allestrinker @l8nighttracker Es gibt noch eine weitere wichtige Studie⤵️ Quantitative errors in the Cochrane revi…

S

SpaS

@sipanne · X

RT @perfektworld: @grok @allestrinker @l8nighttracker Es gibt noch eine weitere wichtige Studie⤵️ Quantitative errors in the Cochrane revi…

G

gamechanger ♟️

@perfektworld · X

RT @perfektworld: @grok @allestrinker @l8nighttracker Es gibt noch eine weitere wichtige Studie⤵️ Quantitative errors in the Cochrane revi…

S

SourceControl21

@SourceControl21 · X

RT @perfektworld: @grok @allestrinker @l8nighttracker Es gibt noch eine weitere wichtige Studie⤵️ Quantitative errors in the Cochrane revi…

G

gamechanger ♟️

@perfektworld · X

@grok @allestrinker @l8nighttracker Es gibt noch eine weitere wichtige Studie⤵️ Quantitative errors in the Cochrane review on "Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses" Yaneer Bar-Yam, Jon Samet, Alexander Siegenfeld, Nassim Taleb https://t.co/as6QyfRljx

TH

Tropic Health

@tropic_health · X

@Jennife08816442 @grok @VPrasadMDMPH @Jennife08816442 @grok @VPrasadMDMPH Look up 'Jefferson T, et al. Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses' Cochrane Database 2023. Raw data > opinions. But they'd rather you not read the actual science.

BH

Becky With The Good Hair

@BeckyJohnson222 · X

@K3LLYB33N This sounds persuasive. But the data show that even N95 masks are ineffective at preventing airborne viruses. See: "Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses" by the Cochrane Review. Masks don't work. This is propaganda.

A

AlexZwitter

@AlexZwitter2 · X

@USMortality Previously from @cochranecollab Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses - https://t.co/QCtUwSLPLz “There was limited evidence that social distancing was effective, especially if related to the risk of exposure.” "There is moderate

A

AlexZwitter

@AlexZwitter2 · X

Another study providing evidence the New Abnormal is not "safe & effective" - https://t.co/OTURU1VARZ Previously from @cochranecollab Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses - https://t.co/aRh4G4v29j “There was limited evidence that https://t.co/gbxdZ5xsCB

LK

Lucja(n) Kifer

@kifer_lucja · X

@MieckaAniolowa Interwencje fizyczne mające na celu przerwanie lub ograniczenie rozprzestrzeniania się wirusów układu oddechowego – Cochrane Library Źródło: Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses https://t.co/6OhHM0f4Q1 Tło: Epidemie wirusowe lub https://t.co/7wNGIiKEgM

DN

deux années au Niger (à Niamey)

@pjd77420 · X

@jeanbarbeau2 @SaiyanBio Cochrane review statement on the study Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses by Tom Jefferson et al : « the results were inconclusive. » March 2023 https://t.co/joN4Ff0moK

DN

deux années au Niger (à Niamey)

@pjd77420 · X

@waynemcdougall @flowirin Cochrane review statement on the study Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses by Tom Jefferson et al : « the results were inconclusive. » https://t.co/joN4Ff0moK

DN

deux années au Niger (à Niamey)

@pjd77420 · X

@jrseihgstein @QI_181 Cochrane review Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses : « the results were inconclusive. » « Les résultats n’ont pas été concluants. » (!) Consulter aussi cette discussion : https://t.co/j5HcY0csf4

DN

deux années au Niger (à Niamey)

@pjd77420 · X

@jrseihgstein @QI_181 Communiqué officiel de la revue Cochrane en juin 2024 à propos de l'étude Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses de Tom Jefferson et al : https://t.co/joN4Ff0moK

A

Article

@Share_article_ · X

Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2023(1), cd006207 - January 2023 https://t.co/uOidMIsASV

DS

Dieles Stolk

@DCSZ14 · X

@ModSlotPro @ErikCumps @sigridschollen @IBonnx @uzgent Als je het niet begrijpt, ben je misschien wat traag van begrip omdat je een hekel hebt aan mondkapjes. "The Cochrane Review 'Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses' was published in January 2023 and has been widely misinterpreted." Karla

JD

Jean Jacques Duvoisin

@duvoisin_jean · X

RT @Xochipelli1953: @ZeClint Cochrane Review: Les masques ne protègent pas… quels que soient leurs types L’étude Cochrane est intitulée “P…

DQ

Danielle Quoeurnat

@DMonamou789 · X

RT @Xochipelli1953: @ZeClint Cochrane Review: Les masques ne protègent pas… quels que soient leurs types L’étude Cochrane est intitulée “P…

XG

Xochi/Dominique Guillet

@Xochipelli1953 · X

@ZeClint Cochrane Review: Les masques ne protègent pas… quels que soient leurs types L’étude Cochrane est intitulée “Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses”. https://t.co/tXt1rrpTL6

AK

Alexis K

@AlexisKat6 · X

@nycexpatmom “Fact-checkers” who labeled reposts of the Cochrane Review “Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses” with no commentary as potentially harmful misinformation. It’s apparent that Brian fails to understand that FB “fact-checkers” are not

リ真

リド⏳｢聖書≠宗教｣宗教が聖書を悪用｢聖書＝真理｣｢真理以外は全て誤謬｣

@hashitameMARU · X

@kitazatosatuki ●Effectiveness of Masks and Respirators Against Respiratory Infections in Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis https://t.co/XCvD1lS2UY ●Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses https://t.co/I5nqtnqE2B

MD

Mami_Aho_Dema

@Mami_Aho_Dema · X

アンタごときに採点できるほど安い人間ではないので

MD

Mami_Aho_Dema

@Mami_Aho_Dema · X

爆笑した 腹痛てぇー

MD

Mami_Aho_Dema

@Mami_Aho_Dema · X

死ぬほど笑った

MD

Mami_Aho_Dema

@Mami_Aho_Dema · X

じゃあ、Idahoの読解力を採点してやろう ほれ、これを読み、何が書かれているか答えろ https://t.co/zZzFB9XCuA Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses https://t.co/78glnQFf76

MD

Mami_Aho_Dema

@Mami_Aho_Dema · X

https://t.co/zZzFB9XCuA Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses まだ理解できえねのか？ 失笑

MD

Mami_Aho_Dema

@Mami_Aho_Dema · X

Idahoは理解できない

MD

Mami_Aho_Dema

@Mami_Aho_Dema · X

お前、コクラン・レビューを知らないのか？ 呆れた

MD

Mami_Aho_Dema

@Mami_Aho_Dema · X

https://t.co/zZzFB9XCuA じゃあ、お前は、これ読んだか？ 何が書かれている？ 答えてみ Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses https://t.co/xRpXDwOjGe

MD

Mami_Aho_Dema

@Mami_Aho_Dema · X

Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses 読んで理解できたか？ 何が書かれてある、答えてみろ https://t.co/zZzFB9XCuA https://t.co/aXgxM4qIz1

FC

Fragmento Cero

@FragmentoCero · X

@Placeb0Mad @wallstwolverine "Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses" – 2020 "Face masks to prevent transmission of influenza virus: a systematic review" – 2010 "Effectiveness of Masks and Respirators Against Respiratory Infections in Healthcare Workers 2017

ね

ねこのそら

@Sola_liberty · X

[Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses] 「呼吸器ウイルスの拡散を阻止または抑制するための物理的介入」 （注：英語が原文。日本語は公式翻訳では無い）

N

Nils

@NilsPuck · X

@MonaLis88125391 @tomdabassman Haben Sie es denn überhaupt nicht gelesen……?

HK

Hermit Kingdom

@kingdom_hermit · X

@dpfdpf But the report's extraordinary claim about "well established" science re: mask-wearing being shown to reduce the spread of Covid does *not* include a reference to the Cochrane Review: "Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses".

J

jlo

@johnjlopez · X

@Demosthenessaid @legittreehugger @eeidiqu @greg_travis You are confused. Read the title. 'Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses' physical interventions is a synonym for MASKS. What a self-own. You don't even understand the article you - yourself linked. HILARIOUS.

Let's recall that the editor-in-chief made a clarification statement where the 2023 Cochrane review of non-pharmaceutical interventions was—controversially—limited to RCTs. It was interpreted by the press and not all of the authors to mean that “masks don’t work” and “mask mandates did nothing”.

AP

Art Fougner PGY50

@sonodoc99 · X

@VPrasadMDMPH Once again: Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses - Jefferson, T - 2023 | Cochrane Library

HS

Håvard Skjærvik

@fingerspitz · X

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 30 January 2023 Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses We included 11 new RCTs and cluster‐RCTs (610,872 participants) in this update, bringing the total number of RCTs to 78 Wearing masks in the

PM

Pat O'Martin

@PatOMartin9 · X

@LerouxArthur10 30/01/2023 Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses, Tom Jefferson et al. https://t.co/PsB5IJgInR @Pr_Chabriere_E https://t.co/eL5fZGqkbk

O

Observer

@Observer9801234 · X

@JustineKirby @CDCDirector Please see the 2023 analysis of 78 RCTs which found no evidence of what you claim Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses - PubMed

RD

Rick Dunmore

@RickDunmore · X

@DrMaireadDB Yup. It's useful when the idiots tell you they're idiots. Fallacious assumptions and conclusion. You'd think an Education PhD would know better ... or perhaps not. Try some science like "Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses -

BV

Bernuilli Valder

@BernulliT · X

@evelio_prieto @gomez_rial5 Rial se refiere últimamente al infame estudio sobre "Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses", publicado en Cochrane el año pasado y del que tuvo que publicar la redactora jefa una aclaración porque es claramente sesgado y desinformador

TG

Trevor Gough

@treego14 · X

Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses - PMC https://t.co/pSsTglu4EG COVID-19 Vaccine Contaminants, Self-Assembling Structures, Nanobots, and Never-Ending Spike Production https://t.co/w8004FZe6E

AS

Ann Smith

@annsmith2024b · X

Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses - Jefferson, T - 2023 | Cochrane Library - did they work? https://t.co/ADbpXCLLVs

も

もぐ

@txRU32d7gd28YBE · X

Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses - Jefferson, T - 2023 | Cochrane Library https://t.co/SSV0LPv5mh

CL

Chris Longhorn

@LonghoC · X

@sheebadigeebies The Cochrane 'Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses' review called and said “It’s déjà vu all over again!”.

WG

Wachsamer Geist

@Shadakin1 · X

Statement on 'Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses' review | Cochrane https://t.co/7d3x6t6EqD

SC

Sensus communis

@SueSensus · X

“Comment on Cochrane review Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses” https://t.co/ZTL3EXaRaJ

KH

Keith Hawker

@KeithHawker1 · X

Comment on Cochrane review Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses https://t.co/KD7QkVs1gw

MN

Matt Nisselle

@MNisselle · X

@taipan168 @TheRealKonstas @VicGovDH Yes, that’s part of the statement I posted. If you read further… “Original statement from March 2023: The Cochrane Review 'Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses' was published in January 2023 and has been widely misinterpreted.”

CH

Chicken Headington

@Chicken__Head · X

@longduckydong @ComatoseGoat @TheBabelFish1 The Cochrane Review 'Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses' [2 was published in January 2023 and has been widely misinterpreted. Karla Soares-Weiser, Editor-in-Chief of the Cochrane Library, has responded on behalf of Cochrane: https://t.co/rXdLuEliTq

左ひ

左馬（ひだりうま）

@lefthorse · X

RT @mama_melaleuca: 1年半後に政府の会見で このレベルの質問が飛ぶって 異常だと思うけど… 公開してくれたのがせめてもの…かしら

は

はゃる

@haruneko_haru · X

RT @mama_melaleuca: 1年半後に政府の会見で このレベルの質問が飛ぶって 異常だと思うけど… 公開してくれたのがせめてもの…かしら

D

doumin

@doumin16 · X

RT @mama_melaleuca: 1年半後に政府の会見で このレベルの質問が飛ぶって 異常だと思うけど… 公開してくれたのがせめてもの…かしら

シ

シングルマザー

@ImmwVs6pnYYOkyS · X

RT @mama_melaleuca: 1年半後に政府の会見で このレベルの質問が飛ぶって 異常だと思うけど… 公開してくれたのがせめてもの…かしら

M某

Melaleuca 某会に毎日監視されている自称元会員

@mama_melaleuca · X

1年半後に政府の会見で このレベルの質問が飛ぶって 異常だと思うけど… 公開してくれたのがせめてもの…かしら

JF

Josch. feat. Frank.

@chefofmembers · X

@SenfScharf Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses https://t.co/yukmEberhm https://t.co/SEBrq4gaCA

M

Michaelia 8:32

@Mike77463289 · X

RT @JoshWalkos: Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses (The now infamous Cochrane review) “The po…

FK

Frank K.

@Lupinien73 · X

RT @chefofmembers: @WHOWPRO Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses https://t.co/6AebivOXYh https:/…

RS

Ringe des Saturns

@ringedessaturns · X

RT @chefofmembers: @WHOWPRO Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses https://t.co/6AebivOXYh https:/…

T

tokatti

@tokatti_ · X

手洗い最強 https://t.co/oIiHVCl8W0 ビタミンCは風邪に効かない https://t.co/ao3syLS2Ty https://t.co/Hs4kDvIKBt #自分用メモ

RE

Ralf Eckstein

@RalfEckstein · X

@Discernm3nt @Kinetic01010 @_APWK_ there are thousands. Here is one https://t.co/VblXdp1xfh

MK

Marius Kesper

@MarKes1900 · X

@Rattenvanger76 @RosemarieVerbr1 @ToutertOenema @Henk47806375 @BorgerPieter @KlaasvanDijk5 @Priest13001186 @DanielTuijnman @waukema @VUamsterdam @CDPNetworkMap @rivm @pimgunzel @E_line @volkskrant @TNO_nieuws @john_bumblebee @CeesCees72 Dan moet je even zeggen waar je het over hebt? Heb je het over specifieke maatregelen of over maatregelen in het algemeen? Er wordt gewoon wetenschappelijke onderzoek gedaan naar hoe je kan voorkomen dat virussen zich verspreiden: https://t.co/EvK4Lt4aOe https://t.co/invviWV0Wy

TR

Thomas RUTH

@TheTomRUTH · X

RT @AlsoRandom: Multiple RCTs. 276k participants. Confirmation #masks offer no benefit. Science never changed. Public health experts LIED a…

JL

Jessica Ledezma Ⓜ️.

@JessicaLedezmaM · X

@verdade59635765 @jotanvillarreal @TReporta @LPacoSucre Según un meta-análisis de 67 estudios de ensayos controlados aleatorizados y estudios observacionales, publicada en la prestigiosa base de datos de medicina y salud pública Cochrane; el uso de mascarillas no reduce la transmisión de virus respiratorios. https://t.co/Gig4rfnmTq

Quantitative errors in the Cochrane review on "Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses" www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-3...

Quantitative errors in the Cochrane review on "Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses". http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.15198

CM

Cyamé Mazine

@Doc_DocDoc · X

@CattinHelene @SaiyanBio Tenez je vous aide : https://t.co/ZHd2txd2bJ

SS

S_Squared

@sandyga2 · X

https://t.co/9dgUD2wpxw Cochrane report on the efficacy of masks

RS

Rik Scholten

@scholten_rik · X

@agent010Rtd @hendrik65218261 @Sabine89833820 @DerWaldmeister @svanweyenberg Het zijn nog een paar fabeltjeskrant https://t.co/f3EL1GlWR4 https://t.co/ITjPV2Igja https://t.co/Cx5pCd9dQc https://t.co/JA4oAYoZl4 https://t.co/1P1q6Xw5IW https://t.co/IK2D718aQU https://t.co/Idcl5342k9

GB

Gregory Travis. @gregorytravis.com on Bsky

@greg_travis · X

@GoBlueReds @Loretta_Torrago @AndOrNorLyn @DianaSimple3 @Truth_in_Number @jneill @19joho @BenjaminMateus7 @mehdirhasan @DrEricDing @1goodtern @ninjagirlphd @micah_arsham Jefferson et. al in 2011 What changed Tom Jefferson's mind between 2011 and 2022 with regard to masks and the ability of children to transmit? https://t.co/ZZP9buR72k https://t.co/2YpaLKf7Aj

LF

LandoFree ✊FreeJulian

@LandoFree · X

RT @AlsoRandom: Multiple RCTs. 276k participants. Confirmation #masks offer no benefit. Science never changed. Public health experts LIED a…

V

virario3

@virario3 · X

RT @karikari77: Según un meta-análisis de 67 estudios de ensayos controlados aleatorizados y estudios observacionales, publicada en la pre…

YM

YO AMO MAGALLANES

@yoamomagallanes · X

RT @karikari77: Según un meta-análisis de 67 estudios de ensayos controlados aleatorizados y estudios observacionales, publicada en la pre…

KV

Kari Rodriguez V

@karikari77 · X

Según un meta-análisis de 67 estudios de ensayos controlados aleatorizados y estudios observacionales, publicada en la prestigiosa base de datos de medicina y salud pública Cochrane; el uso de mascarillas no reduce la transmisión de virus respiratorios. https://t.co/N8k2khF4Yq

GZ

God Zilla

@desert_modern · X

RT @AlsoRandom: Multiple RCTs. 276k participants. Confirmation #masks offer no benefit. Science never changed. Public health experts LIED a…

X

XAR

@Xar_Crystal · X

@balboa41 @Fabi2711296541 @TheStrongerJose @dargomen Aqui tienes pruebas amigo: 1.- Según un meta-análisis de 67 estudios de ensayos controlados aleatorizados y estudios observacionales, publicada en la prestigiosa base de datos de medicina y salud pública Cochrane; el uso de mascarillas no reduce la https://t.co/Sx0ZMSLMxE

BC

Bob Cumming

@bobepidemiology · X

@longfacehorse @zeynep Here it is if you want to read it. https://t.co/Kkj8tts6M6

DS

Dr R de Silva

@DrRodeSilva · X

@SameeraAriyara4 @Kamal74162602 @theceylonpress Links https://t.co/aNZEcvqjEw https://t.co/FGBMhxPKPp Question: who is more probably to be incentivised as a physician: prescribing or not. Tobacco was a great example of paid science.With stats you can do everything. So wheres the truth? Pfizer is renowned for criminal scandals

MF

Mary Flynn

@Mary_Flynn17 · X

RT @LoveHamma9: Mask data: Start of pandemic, we KNEW: Cochrane Review 2011 https://t.co/F2fpKnscr3 CR Nov 2020 update (no change): https:/…

VS

Vitor Borin P. de Souza

@vitorborin_ · X

@FredLAFernandes @alinefortuna2 @lcos3060 Nesse ponto tem uma explicação: não é uma revisão atual, é uma atualização (se não me engano a quinta) de uma revisão que já vinha desde antes da pandemia. https://t.co/CvY19GT04A

PG

Pedro Gonnet

@GonnetPedro · X

You can still go and reat the last version before the Covid-19 pandemic (July 2011, https://t.co/GFYBslSjnD).

TD

Trent DeRoc

@TrentDeRoc · X

RT @wandering_stoic: @tomaspueyo It's interesting, because the 2011 Cochrane Review found masks to be the most effective physical preventiv…

JH

Jian_de (Almost Human)

@wandering_stoic · X

@tomaspueyo It's interesting, because the 2011 Cochrane Review found masks to be the most effective physical preventive measure against SARS type viruses, with simple masks just as effective as N95. https://t.co/7d52D7GG9J

LA

Luc Aerts

@Luketheduke1960 · X

@David__Molenaar @NeyensSimonne @BoeckBernard @DirkvanLinth @CallsCarioca @Food4ears @DrDavidNL @HDrsslr @TomXtheys @KoenenNicky @vdvehi @irEnriqueCortes @david_molenaar Even focus, David....weet je dat je de neiging hebt om makkelijk af te wijken. Kan je even inhoudelijk reageren op het volgende aub? Ik heb dat in deze studie gelezen...misschien ken je die? https://t.co/bxVH84mKv7 #wappies https://t.co/p9562PGP6a

LA

Luc Aerts

@Luketheduke1960 · X

@David__Molenaar @BoeckBernard @DirkvanLinth @DrDavidNL @NeyensSimonne @Food4ears @HDrsslr @TomXtheys @KoenenNicky @vdvehi @irEnriqueCortes Het gaat toch om deze studie, he!? #wappies https://t.co/bxVH84mKv7

AW

Alan Watson

@Alan_Watson_ · X

@agargmd Furthermore this review, unlike the previous one by the Cochrane collaboration (Doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub4.) , excluded case-control studies which indicated far more positive outcomes from mask-wearing: https://t.co/wHFFeJuGmG

RM

Ryan Radecki, MD MS

@emlitofnote · X

@AstorAaron @ianmSC @kevinnbass You're welcome to review the evidence included in the prior review and come to your own conclusions regarding the potential public health utility and/or uptake of gowns and gloves; some evidence from healthcare settings likely does not generalize. https://t.co/2iB3k9luqE

O

Ołówków

@Woofkoof · X

@FoxNews Nine case-control studies suggested implementing transmission barriers, isolation & hygienic measures are effective at containing respiratory virus epidemics. Surgical masks or N95 respirators were the most consistent and comprehensive supportive measures. https://t.co/pF7oYC4wp3

GB

Gregory Travis. @gregorytravis.com on Bsky

@greg_travis · X

@snorman1776 This Cochrane review? https://t.co/ZZP9buR72k https://t.co/HbgWOC6nIh

CH

Captain Archibald Haddock

@captainoldsalt · X

RT @AlsoRandom: Multiple RCTs. 276k participants. Confirmation #masks offer no benefit. Science never changed. Public health experts LIED a…

GB

Gregory Travis. @gregorytravis.com on Bsky

@greg_travis · X

@CPita3 @cochranecollab What a difference a decade makes https://t.co/ZZP9buR72k https://t.co/jJIHkcDmnI

CM

Christopher Miller

@ChrisMillerArt · X

@SwitchbladeSean @bern_identity @BernieSanders Why post and edited photo that's chopped up removing the findings of those studies? Like the one at the top that literally says: "Surgical masks or N95 respirators were the most consistent and comprehensive supportive measures." https://t.co/4ql5OVRtr3.

JN

Jonathan Nowlan

@JonNowlan420 · X

@canindependent Great Study! https://t.co/sGrEW2h72A

TS

The Speculatist

@AlsoRandom · X

Multiple RCTs. 276k participants. Confirmation #masks offer no benefit. Science never changed. Public health experts LIED about masks, LIED about vaccine efficacy, LIED about risks & continue to LIE to cover up their crimes. #NoCovidAmnesty https://t.co/v7u0WN3mAb https://t.co/H9aEoRVW3v https://t.co/BRG8ts70RT

‘Physical Interventions to Interrupt or Reduce the Spread of Respiratory Viruses’. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 1 (20 January 2010): CD006207. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub3.

?

❤️

@ReneGraeber · X

@DrScheuch Der Vergleich mit Schweden ist ein starkes Indiz, dass die Masken keinen Effekt hatten. Da der Coch. Link nicht funzt: https://t.co/JfLHUC3u7k Die Mainresults im Abstract stützen m.E. aber nicht ihre Aussage... Können Sie bitte nochmal genauer Stellung nehmen?

MD

Mark Davison

@Fuengi · X

@davecoopcourier @DrAseemMalhotra According to the best research available N95 dust masks don't have any significant impact on transmission of a respiratory virus. https://t.co/NEkN9SmM9W

IP

Illinois Patriot

@Realfedco_IL · X

RT @LoveHamma9: @boriquagato Wow, mask advocates totally ignore randomized trials! Cochrane Review 2011 https://t.co/F2fpKnrEBv CR Nov 2020…

BM

Beware the Straw Man

@FreeSpeechLifer · X

@boriquagato Wow, mask advocates totally ignore randomized trials! Cochrane Review 2011 https://t.co/F2fpKnrEBv CR Nov 2020 update (no change): https://t.co/SGmzoprd5R Danish RCT, IMHO best public use RCT, given 50 surgical masks & TRAINED in proper use. https://t.co/Se9CDxgrta

JH

Jian_de (Almost Human)

@wandering_stoic · X

@jeffreyswisher @Noahpinion @Quadroopled It wasn't the best data at the time though. You're an anesthesiologist, so you know how much weight Cochrane Reviews carry. In 2011 a Cochrane Review was published on physical preventive measures for SARS type viruses, and masks were the most effective. https://t.co/7d52D7owVB

BM

Beware the Straw Man

@FreeSpeechLifer · X

Mask data: Start of pandemic, we KNEW: Cochrane Review 2011 https://t.co/F2fpKnscr3 CR Nov 2020 update (no change): https://t.co/SGmzoprKVp Danish RCT, IMHO best public use RCT, given 50 surgical masks & TRAINED in proper use. https://t.co/Se9CDxgZiI

BM

Beware the Straw Man

@FreeSpeechLifer · X

@MerianneJensen Masks don't have the evidence the media implies. Cochrane Review Nov 2020 https://t.co/wOJFEmm0U1 Which showed the same as 2011 https://t.co/YRMHsQtNXS https://t.co/Gc9EpJyRuo

BM

Beware the Straw Man

@FreeSpeechLifer · X

@VPrasadMDMPH Masks don't have the evidence the media implies. Cochrane Review Nov 2020 https://t.co/wOJFEmm0U1 Which showed the same as 2011 https://t.co/YRMHsQtNXS https://t.co/QliOBMZ0DU

BM

Beware the Straw Man

@FreeSpeechLifer · X

@TIME @GYamey @AbraarKaran Masks don't have the evidence the media implies. Cochrane Review Nov 2020 https://t.co/wOJFEmm0U1 Which showed the same as 2011 https://t.co/YRMHsQtNXS https://t.co/nXFCtDbdID

HT

How we think

@Howwethink2 · X

@TopeMeister @confusedteacups @AVIHouseParty @TheFreds Please read the articles in the links. N95 masks are included in many studies. N99 masks suffer the same limitations of gaps around the nose and chin. Face coverings are not respirators. https://t.co/0OWX9mMbTm https://t.co/aieiQ2b7Gz

HS

hmn-sm

@hmn_sm · X

@ero20160817 @keijitakeda @HKIunvkAuTBvBic @sakuraayaneo @mph_for_doctors @takavet1 「2020/4/7 RCT15件分析」で以下の文献が参照されていました https://t.co/M7KjvrE1VK こちらは、SARSに関する結果という事で、明確な保護効果が示されているようです https://t.co/hz3I5GYkJb

BM

Beware the Straw Man

@FreeSpeechLifer · X

@Leftylockdowns1 @JeromeAdamsMD Cochrane Review Nov 2020 https://t.co/ui3Vo7Hfzp Which showed the same as 2011 https://t.co/sNNlyivHpi https://t.co/MaxGcqK59i

KH

Keep your mask on she/her

@Charlotteshhhh · X

RT @ToshiAkima: @PPEtoheros @MackayIM @JuliaRaifman @WalkerBragman @DFisman @dgurdasani1 @RickABright @LazarusLong13 @JudahWorldChamp @elis…

D秋

Dr Satoshi Akima FRACP 『秋間聰』

@ToshiAkima · X

@PPEtoheros @MackayIM @JuliaRaifman @WalkerBragman @DFisman @dgurdasani1 @RickABright @LazarusLong13 @JudahWorldChamp @elisaperego78 @jvipondmd @nilikm @TRyanGregory @EnemyInAState @RealSexyCyborg @DrEricDing My SARS1/H1N1 era clinical PPE training was consistent with this 2011 Cochrane review in which we could already see a strong historical trend towards transitioning towards more robust respiratory protection, including N95s https://t.co/ljIWoFQ6X2

CX

Cautious Xitter

@cautiousotter · X

@JanPost73348770 @ChuckWurster https://t.co/G9nJtVTlMm

DN

Dr Evonne T Curran NursD

@EvonneTCurran · X

Study 46 Cochrane Review https://t.co/TbylTMsfAN It does state "N95 respirators were non-inferior to simple surgical masks but more expensive, uncomfortable and irritating to skin." However none of the studies mention N95s being uncomfortable or irritating. Non-inferior next...

SN

Syed Shahrul Naz

@drshahrul80 · X

RT @ToshiAkima: @DRTomlinsonEP @danielgoyal @trishgreenhalgh @ProfEmer @YouAreLobbyLud This 2011 post-SARS1 Cochrane review concluded "a su…

T

truthshamesthe6

@truthshamesthe6 · X

RT @ToshiAkima: @DRTomlinsonEP @danielgoyal @trishgreenhalgh @ProfEmer @YouAreLobbyLud This 2011 post-SARS1 Cochrane review concluded "a su…

AC

Anna Davidson | OzSAGE | #CovidisAirborne

@PMGPSC · X

RT @ToshiAkima: @DRTomlinsonEP @danielgoyal @trishgreenhalgh @ProfEmer @YouAreLobbyLud This 2011 post-SARS1 Cochrane review concluded "a su…

D秋

Dr Satoshi Akima FRACP 『秋間聰』

@ToshiAkima · X

@DRTomlinsonEP @danielgoyal @trishgreenhalgh @ProfEmer @YouAreLobbyLud Yes Jefferson et alia. But it shows that comes 2011 there was already clearly a movement towards prioritising respiratory airborne precautions over measures and this is explicitly stated in the conclusions https://t.co/ljIWoFQ6X2

D秋

Dr Satoshi Akima FRACP 『秋間聰』

@ToshiAkima · X

@DRTomlinsonEP @danielgoyal @trishgreenhalgh @ProfEmer @YouAreLobbyLud This 2011 post-SARS1 Cochrane review concluded "a surgical mask or a N95 mask is the measure with the most consistent and comprehensive supportive evidence". During SARS1 PPE training we were trained to wear N95s https://t.co/2JKQCvLQYF https://t.co/9TCbJIbzYG

D

Disidente_1

@Disidente_1 · X

@ministeriosalud Según un meta-análisis de 67 estudios de ensayos controlados aleatorizados y estudios observacionales, EL USO DE MASCARILLAS NO REDUCE LA TRANSMISIÓN DE VIRUS RESPIRATORIOS. https://t.co/AYxPO3Scgm

JB

Julia Bowler

@JuliaBowler3 · X

@IsabelOakeshott What colour is the sky on your planet? THE PANDEMIC ISN'T OVER.. wear a mask. They, at least give you some protection. https://t.co/03SCfCkGVG https://t.co/e4iDtJPGTg https://t.co/4Wsk8jndRQ https://t.co/pyIzUkM3UM

E

Elbiux

@SolisElba · X

@HLGatell Así como se está cayendo la farsa de la efectividad de las vacunas así se van a conocer los daños que provoca el pudrebocas. Porque obligar a los niños a llevarlo a las escuelas..? https://t.co/BhJ8dJKc9D https://t.co/W8GsXGgZRi

V

Veronica

@zutirev · X

@gabrielboric @begoyarza @ministeriosalud Aquí más ciencia sobre la mascarilla(resumo,no hay ni una prueba científica q el bozal ayude en nada) https://t.co/6QQ4S93LNl https://t.co/MrE6HgakLb https://t.co/WSm4632sHu sound-data? fbclid=IwAR2xu6vpqbPvR_FpnAsoiRknWjGW6T2rhvySyhUNhTqtQ488Us7OBtcYtVc https://t.co/zYxXQ3GD7K

U

USMC36

@cms36 · X

@markcolwell4 @StarMedCare Cochrane review on physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses included 67 RCTs and observational studies. It found that “overall masks were the best performing intervention across populations, settings and threats. https://t.co/qnGCDxxRZF

C

ContraCorrienteChile

@contra_chile · X

@M_Andres_CC @CallamperasCien 1ro Un solo meta análisis de de 67 estudios en una localidad. https://t.co/DfPRat6rf0 Te paso el suizo, sueco, holandés, el judío, el de el british medical journal, el de la oms todos los estudios en todas las localidades, regiones, paises del mundo traducidos y te los sumo?

NS

Nick Sullivan

@nicksullivan_81 · X

@DrAmirKhanGP This information is not new, here is one large, well-conducted systematic review on use of masks and respiratory virus transmission that pre-dates the pandemic: https://t.co/C4KUuOECXy

NS

Nick Sullivan

@nicksullivan_81 · X

@KevinWa57956936 @DrAmirKhanGP Thanks for the question. As you'll know it's limited for COVID-19, but reasonable to extrapolate systematic review evidence from other respiratory viruses. Here's one e.g.: https://t.co/C4KUuOECXy

I

InternautaMotivado

@Tosuvag · X

@Cotekin1 @Nickimimi @biobio Version actualizada del mismo estudio, el link estaba ahi mismo, no lo vio? https://t.co/jsxIBh0Rpd https://t.co/vVlADHpn97

AK

Alex Kluge

@AlexVKluge · X

@SlyDemure @Suavecito16 medrvix is prepublished, pre review drafts. The final version clearly documents the effectiveness of masks: ... studies suggested implementing transmission barriers, isolation and hygienic measures are effective at containing respiratory virus epidemics https://t.co/WRGrnXd3MJ

IG

Ira 'Greybeard Homer' Goldman

@KDbyProxy · X

@TaraRoss @StevenJDuffield "Nine case-control studies suggested implementing transmission barriers, isolation & hygienic measures are effective at containing respiratory virus epidemics. Surgical masks or N95 respirators were the most consistent & comprehensive supportive measures." https://t.co/deqFndonKN

SP

SRS #RaiseTheRate. Same @ on the blue place

@watinthe_ · X

RT @ToshiAkima: From a Cochrane review dated 6th Jul 2011: "Surgical masks or N95 respirators were the most consistent and comprehensive su…

MA

Mostapha Habib Allah

@NephroMostapha · X

RT @ToshiAkima: From a Cochrane review dated 6th Jul 2011: "Surgical masks or N95 respirators were the most consistent and comprehensive su…

D秋

Dr Satoshi Akima FRACP 『秋間聰』

@ToshiAkima · X

From a Cochrane review dated 6th Jul 2011: "Surgical masks or N95 respirators were the most consistent and comprehensive supportive measures. There was limited evidence that social distancing was effective" https://t.co/ljIWoFxXIU

ИИ

Ивáн Инград

@ivaningrad · X

@kilocurie @JorgeB2021 @zerausbrj @Benjamin_Khalid @MrDavis_No8 @alfonsopineiro @Elzenutrio @BIOCOMSC1 Te lo explico, para que entiendas lo que has usado. La referencia (15) es una versión de 2011 (https://t.co/4ZXSGcBUrW), la referencia (16) es el mismo meta-análisis de los mismos autores actulizado en 2020, ya no es preprint. (https://t.co/ndUpe4cMJ8). https://t.co/5P8L6SoSxb

DN

Dr. Constance Nasello

@OBDoc5 · X

RT @ToshiAkima: In hindsight, it is unsurprising that measures directly targeting aerosol transmission of an airborne virus "were the most…

NC

Nancy R. Curtis

@oponiak · X

RT @ToshiAkima: In hindsight, it is unsurprising that measures directly targeting aerosol transmission of an airborne virus "were the most…

C

Catherine

@Catheri74969435 · X

RT @ToshiAkima: In hindsight, it is unsurprising that measures directly targeting aerosol transmission of an airborne virus "were the most…

DS

Dr Daya Sharma

@DrDayaSharma · X

RT @ToshiAkima: In hindsight, it is unsurprising that measures directly targeting aerosol transmission of an airborne virus "were the most…

D秋

Dr Satoshi Akima FRACP 『秋間聰』

@ToshiAkima · X

@jmcrookston After SARS1, a 2011 Cochrane review stated: "Surgical masks or N95 respirators were the most consistent and comprehensive supportive measures. There was limited evidence that social distancing was effective, especially if related to the risk of exposure." https://t.co/ljIWoFxXIU

NA

Nation Aegis

@NationAegis · X

@Billhart46 @PhattGreg @FLSurgeonGen @dockaurG https://t.co/YmtynWXL6h https://t.co/5PPsrSoXtM https://t.co/atOInG81vB https://t.co/XmC4RfIhBz https://t.co/bm8gPQDGKc https://t.co/bPMwpM04Gt https://t.co/2GJgZZfP1Y https://t.co/Y6Z7jJCefi I can get more. Let me know if you want me to to.

S

Sarbloh

@SarblohMindset · X

A huge systematic review from 2011: “overall masks were the best performing intervention across populations, settings and threats.” https://t.co/iLQROKYRpc

R

Rachel

@Budsgirl031314 · X

@MRibeiro_MD @benshapiro https://t.co/1392CYMEgK

JE

jim eriksen

@vikyor1 · X

@EmiliaHerault @The_Truth_Sir @2020Blueprint @ianmSC @AnnCoulter The scientific literature overwhelmingly favors source control, as these systematic reviews and meta analysis show. https://t.co/kMgM0WNDKI https://t.co/jVAkcfOxS5 https://t.co/3XM9ipRoBy https://t.co/rDPcimoCLy https://t.co/QlgetJXgc6

II

Intelectual imposter

@Sixtytw91924815 · X

@Kind_Geek @DrEliDavid @yaacovbaruch @SunetraGupta Honest research about masks, meta-analyses of the best mask rcts, both published on May 2020: https://t.co/gva5FkleEI https://t.co/AHKlkj1DDW Read the papers, opinino articles with twisted facts don't count.

JE

jim eriksen

@vikyor1 · X

@EmiliaHerault @The_Truth_Sir @2020Blueprint @ianmSC @AnnCoulter Sources: https://t.co/kMgM0WNDKI https://t.co/3XM9ipRoBy https://t.co/jVAkcfOxS5 https://t.co/rDPcimoCLy https://t.co/QlgetJXgc6 https://t.co/xMu601ghSs

RH

Rob H

@arob505 · X

@Ouhockey34 @RexChapman Thankfully, I don't have to wish. https://t.co/zbgTjqdWwb

MU

Mike (“most likely to succeed” runner-up, 2005)

@mearmstrong77 · X

@HotTakes1 @shanana1982 Sure, there are numerous: https://t.co/Q5RkZ23AnB https://t.co/pAEQyztIgr https://t.co/9BeUcKS50q https://t.co/A0gWMs0co2 https://t.co/xiWcqOFRHD

JH

Jian_de (Almost Human)

@wandering_stoic · X

@pbreit @NateSilver538 Sure. This is the older version, relevant to what was available prior. https://t.co/7d52D7owVB

فض

فَيْض

@FaizAmaze · X

@dudeman36032198 @TheJimmyGraham @NFLPA It depends on what you count as data, no RCTs, but there are cohorts and mechanistic studies. https://t.co/vA9vjgd06J https://t.co/aScG6MtAf3 https://t.co/m6eUUfGJhu

GM

Graham Walker, MD

@grahamwalker · X

Several fair, honest reviews about masks, including studies where masks did and DID NOT show benefit: Recent: https://t.co/TcrC6I98NH 2011, way before COVID got politicized: https://t.co/OGODS5yqpW Nursing review:

ИИ

Ивáн Инград

@ivaningrad · X

@amlgv @CollOrduna @Broderil @zerausbrj @toni17lopez @lord_juli Además, ese de Cochrane es de 2010 (https://t.co/4ZXSGcBUrW) la mitad de los RCTs del meta-análisis de RCTs de la OMS son posteriores al de Cochrane. No los conocían, hay mucha evidencia posterior.

JB

Julia Bott

@JuliaBott5 · X

RT @ProfHurst: Well, there is good evidence from this systematic review

AA

Abby Acone

@abbyacone · X

@Chessme35690397 @komonews Here are additional resources: https://t.co/e0NzAUpWnS I have not read the entire study, but this is also recommended for additional data on masking: https://t.co/M2iYZtI3VL Thank you for writing and I hope you check out these links.

L

LeftrightleftArchi

@LeftrightArchi · X

@TruthandSports @redwingkeigo @xperimentado @LCal60 @Thetankone1992 @GavinNewsom There are full studies out there to prove basic physics because of dumbasses like you https://t.co/eNiCOd9wSM

JH

John Hurst

@ProfHurst · X

Well, there is good evidence from this systematic review

OT

Only The Truth

@TantumVero · X

@humpercringe @lmlavallee63 @ENBertussi @brittlestar @PeterKellyBC Here's another scientific study by a stack of doctors that concluded, "Surgical masks or N95 respirators were the most consistent and comprehensive supportive measures." https://t.co/xfePhWtj9M

EX

EL Plan de Xabi

@johnFstemmedy · X

@TrackingCovid It's a difficult topic. Papers about Masks against Covid are advancing rapidly and really there are suggestions for and against the effectiveness. It's still not clear evidence. https://t.co/cAExBYLIG0 https://t.co/26ucdjRO0E https://t.co/8MFFiQwXID

D

Drizzt

@drizzt__dourden · X

@LithSereg Eso lo dice el Jefe de Medicina Interna de la Paz. No un cualquiera. No hace falta que explique que fue todo lo que vino después. Y ojo, entiendo que entre lo ocultado en China y lo que se sabía, podía haber dudas. Aunque había varios estudios ya: https://t.co/0btoP4zKKL

新B

新型Shiki Byakko

@shikibyakko · X

@u11nbk_flower @MasayukiMuto 他にあるRCT: https://t.co/qU5eGuF46I https://t.co/FfaZJpw0aU https://t.co/5OtsL5udlJ https://t.co/0uSPEBvbL8 https://t.co/j3gLrbLT4c https://t.co/yQmqShudxp https://t.co/hwSiqi8d7u https://t.co/pAZcYj4Eio

AK

Amy Kosari

@AmyKosari · X

@MikeyPanik @DatGlacierBoy @nytimes And look at note 15. Here they are citing this study: https://t.co/Ia5ngl9s4h What do we learn from this? Reliance on observational studies.

P

PJL

@PJL828 · X

@Reasonableques3 @LowonZ @spectator "Global measures, such as screening at entry ports, led to a non‐significant marginal delay in spread. … There is insufficient evidence to support screening at entry ports as a method to reduce spread during epidemics." (2011 systematic review) https://t.co/9pEkB3RcJo

AV

ALFONSO Vl

@Combarbala200 · X

RT @Pikachad1: #PcrFalsosPositivos 63% de los test dan falsos positivos por si acaso. Todo esto es una mentira. https://t.co/QLXfjkS5DW E…

DV

David #free Venezuela !!!

@David62459466 · X

RT @Pikachad1: #PcrFalsosPositivos 63% de los test dan falsos positivos por si acaso. Todo esto es una mentira. https://t.co/QLXfjkS5DW E…

DI

DE_Inversor

@monolocoj · X

RT @Pikachad1: #PcrFalsosPositivos 63% de los test dan falsos positivos por si acaso. Todo esto es una mentira. https://t.co/QLXfjkS5DW E…

P

Pikachad ⚡

@Pikachad1 · X

#PcrFalsosPositivos 63% de los test dan falsos positivos por si acaso. Todo esto es una mentira. https://t.co/QLXfjkS5DW Está demostrado que el uso de mascarillas no reduce la transmisión de virus respiratorios: https://t.co/PXl7x4GC1J

S

schnufi666

@schnufi666 · X

@fffeeerrr68 I've found this statement now, but in the version published in 2011. Which is not the recent version from 2020, where they came to a different conclusion. https://t.co/dHScfeoF3y

G

Grimmy

@VileGrim · X

@weirdmedicine @traip95 And one more: https://t.co/LjILtZdaY9 https://t.co/fiIQhEVkmy https://t.co/kL79UjbVEF https://t.co/P6k6mquVbn https://t.co/Fp8X8WvsgA https://t.co/F2kInRqFCN https://t.co/cHowJ0CT8e https://t.co/Oa0euvwgKg https://t.co/pCocRkk9RQ

M

Martin

@Martin27715067 · X

@MarioArgenta @mtgreenee @gatewaypundit Study 4 Meta-analysis of six case-control studies suggests that physical measures are highly effective in preventing the spread of SARS: wearing masks (0.32, 0.25 to 0.40; NNT=6, 4.54 to 8.03); wearing N95 masks (0.09, 0.03 to 0.30; NNT=3, 2.37 to 4.06); https://t.co/otf7BkOA2A

M

Martin

@Martin27715067 · X

@glenda_aus @KDKA Meta-analysis of six case-control studies suggests that physical measures are highly effective in preventing the spread of SARS: wearing masks (0.32, 0.25 to 0.40; NNT=6, 4.54 to 8.03); wearing N95 masks (0.09, 0.03 to 0.30; NNT=3, 2.37 to 4.06); https://t.co/otf7BkOA2A

SS

steve hayes : also @shimself.bsky.social

@shimself · X

@GeorgePorterGP @CheckOrphan @carlheneghan @spectator Masks worked for SARS1. https://t.co/0Iboc4wQU1 This is what is called researched evidence. Do tell me why this is wrong

SS

steve hayes : also @shimself.bsky.social

@shimself · X

@GeorgePorterGP @kbkorb @carlheneghan @spectator "These data suggest that wearing a surgical mask or a N95 mask is the measure with the most consistent and comprehensive supportive evidence....Overall masks were the best performing intervention across populations, settings and threats." On SARS 1 ! https://t.co/0Iboc4wQU1

ES

En S

@ee1ss1 · X

@aalon @PlumProfessora @ChrysalidesArt @ColleenHuberNMD wards." https://t.co/TUsfbVVogg 3. Every single one of the studies in the table and in the link examines influenza. Influenza is not SARS-CoV-2. There are certainly similarities, but the differ in notable ways, especially R0. 4. It would be patently foolish to ignore the 3/?

SS

steve hayes : also @shimself.bsky.social

@shimself · X

@CheckOrphan @carlheneghan @spectator Not so https://t.co/0Iboc4wQU1 The pooled case‐control studies, which focused on the SARS coronavirus (SARS CoV), suggest that.....Overall masks were the best performing intervention across populations, settings and threats.

SS

steve hayes : also @shimself.bsky.social

@shimself · X

@JoMama43651102 @riz_uk @carlheneghan @spectator They do. https://t.co/0Iboc4wQU1

SS

steve hayes : also @shimself.bsky.social

@shimself · X

@carlheneghan @spectator Sars 1 metastudy (combining 8 studies into one bigger and therefore more statistically significant result). From 2012, SARS version 1. Real result, not lab based theory. Masks reduced infection rates. https://t.co/0Iboc4wQU1

YG

Yankee Girl

@yankeegirlnj65 · X

@always_shiplove @davis_bradley1 @Zigmanfreud @OhioYallers @MyMindsEye924 The study footnoted: "Simple and low‐cost interventions would be useful for reducing transmission of epidemic respiratory viruses." https://t.co/y6R0DAlZ8T

YG

Yankee Girl

@yankeegirlnj65 · X

@always_shiplove @davis_bradley1 @Zigmanfreud @OhioYallers @MyMindsEye924 It's a summary with several attached studies, like this one that was footnoted for the quote I attached. Again, there is way more science supporting the use than not. But, you do you. https://t.co/y6R0DAlZ8T

SB

Shill Bitch

@ShillBitch · X

@Eidgenosse1291 @SVPch 67 Studien aus dem Jahr 2011 https://t.co/3nXPCzsW0n

SS

steve hayes : also @shimself.bsky.social

@shimself · X

@Stromite1 @Dr_D_Robertson Ahem SARS1 in 2011, a cochrane metastudy. They do reduce infection rates, in real life, not lab based not modelling but in a real epidemic . Kindly delete your post. https://t.co/0Iboc4wQU1

S

SXavier

@groslik · X

@TomCailleretz @medicalfollower meta analyse cochrane 2011 : https://t.co/eraQlJ0GdQ : "Surgical masks or N95 respirators were the most consistent and comprehensive supportive measures" Mais c'est comme vous voulez il y a des tas d'exemples de super spreaders en milieu fermés, en corée, au restaurant, en alsace

SS

steve hayes : also @shimself.bsky.social

@shimself · X

@Ferndogg24 @TomSnrub @john_mcguirk Evidence you say... https://t.co/0Iboc4wQU1

SS

steve hayes : also @shimself.bsky.social

@shimself · X

@john_mcguirk @knoweuro Sars1 metastudy demonstrating masks worked. https://t.co/0Iboc4wQU1

ﾚM

ﾚｲﾃｽﾄｼｮｯﾄ　7/9 MMPNP

@tarashinon · X

RT @ToshiAkima: @joplutz @DrPascalMeier The rule in Australia is 4m squared social distancing. There is no evidence for any of this and it…

SS

steve hayes : also @shimself.bsky.social

@shimself · X

@simondolan FFS this from March 12th, you're cheating with this. 7 months later we know masks work. Actually we had a jolly good idea before that https://t.co/0Iboc4wQU1

G

Gian

@Gian_XXIV · X

@stefanauer_hku WHO is a bureaucratic body. A cursory look at the scientific literature concerning the older relative SARS-CoV would've yielded the result that mask wearing is the most effective physical measure for transmission reduction. Instance of this: https://t.co/cv1dKQJXSB

SS

steve hayes : also @shimself.bsky.social

@shimself · X

@ColleenHuberNMD And then we have "Prior research has overwhelmingly shown that there is no significant evidence of benefits of masks, particularly regarding transmission of viral infection" I offer you https://t.co/0Iboc4wQU1 a metastudy of mask use during Sars 1. They worked

BS

Björn Schmitt

@DerGer0nim0 · X

@chris85253 @ANothlich @Markus_Soeder Die überwiegende Mehrheit der Studien dazu belegen einen Effekt... https://t.co/LWOus4aD1z https://t.co/dfkdHUWXcw https://t.co/2jGMUKCStV https://t.co/sRJ59jbWLz https://t.co/7G6SO7Mqzt https://t.co/BDRVgJyYNq https://t.co/uL59N9D8xw https://t.co/9O2omlhsGA...

SM

Steve Martin

@semartin · X

@7H3_P00N_5L4Y3R @johnpaulUK @_EnvyNoOne_ @RichardDawkins Weird, citing The Atlantic as a source https://t.co/G4jvNgluCU

JA

José Alberto

@josealberto_gc · X

@Loboisthewolf @YoGuajiroCubano "Implementing barriers to transmission, such as isolation, and hygienic measures (wearing masks, gloves and gowns) can be effective in containing respiratory virus epidemics or in hospital wards". #MaskUp https://t.co/ImhwiuXJgJ

SS

steve hayes : also @shimself.bsky.social

@shimself · X

@emmakennytv Here you go. SARS1 transmission reduced. Real life evidence, not lab based. A Cochrane metastudy. https://t.co/0Iboc4wQU1

GD

GATE Danielle

@DanielleGate · X

Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses - Jefferson, T - 2011 | Cochrane Library https://t.co/WBTXj5LJ4u

A

Alexander

@AlexHodgkinsJ · X

@same_script @theJeremyVine @DrAnaMRSB Just trying to explain how this is a flawed and an unscientific approach. Here are two systematic reviews of studies of community use of facemasks by members of the public which both favour their use to prevent the spread of viral respiratory infections. https://t.co/fsdwaMU5g5

PH

PK BSc. BMLSc. C¡s She/Her

@Pianokit · X

@JamesPo31414630 @DaphnaRedliner @gibb_dennis @marcdaalder A few cherry picked quotes, out of context of the whole article to support your view.On balance, according to the Cochrane systematic review of the literature, masks as part of other physical measures to prevent spread of respiratory viruses are effective. https://t.co/J11CoZejIc

OB

Ophelia Bottom

@OpheliaBottom · X

@PaulTavares74 @IsItBroke @paul_clarke There's also pre-COVID evidence for other viral respiratory illnesses https://t.co/OKWw1b294G

SS

steve hayes : also @shimself.bsky.social

@shimself · X

@trishgreenhalgh https://t.co/0Iboc4wQU1 real world outcomes for SARS1 in 2011. When compared to all the guesswork early on re touching faces, droplet size etc I thought this should have driven policy from day 1.

OK

Ozayr Khawar

@KhawarOzayr · X

RT @Dobackian: @DanCGoldberg @jimcramer https://t.co/Vr4vURZDlz ????

ZL

Zach Laughlin

@ZachLaughlin · X

@metadaddy @prs5007 @jimcramer https://t.co/Vr4vURZDlz

ZL

Zach Laughlin

@ZachLaughlin · X

@DanCGoldberg @jimcramer https://t.co/Vr4vURZDlz ????

ZL

Zach Laughlin

@ZachLaughlin · X

@AdmiralHackbar @jimcramer https://t.co/Vr4vURZDlz

ZL

Zach Laughlin

@ZachLaughlin · X

@DanCGoldberg @jimcramer https://t.co/Vr4vURZDlz ????

DA

Daxtertricks (ADHS)

@daxtertricks · X

@Heinzenstein @filousoph70 @MenschBernd @tazgezwitscher Oder auch hier https://t.co/0qaVVJb8gX

RZ

Rafael Zúñiga

@rzunigl · X

Con un poquito de Data Science, y que tanto evangelizo, imaginen este trabajo en nov/dic del año pasado o enero de este año. La tasa de contagios hubiera sido de no más del 5%, si agregamos falta de cultura y cohesión con normativas, sería del 10%!!!!. https://t.co/w2j0eV0jZJ

M

MarkP

@markpelzel · X

@tturnt1 @heckyeahamerica @Appleice20 @FFroodle @joy_juniper @JoeBiden Dr Jefferson and colleagues might emphasize the use of a disposable containment vessel (rather than a sleeve or traditional handkerchief), but I carry a handkerchief anyway since it's the gentlemanly thing to do in preparation of providing assistance - https://t.co/vzzdZnTBM3

AO

amel_ou

@amel_ou · X

@ImanMoulouad @McSkyzyoutube Une première si t'as du temps https://t.co/4jmzgJIOd0

MT

Maria I. Tapia

@mariaitapia · X

@UniversalMaski2 @OmkarGV @raj_mehta @eliowa @SaskiaPopescu @jljcolorado @kprather88 It's not proven that respirators offer greater protection than surgical masks, in a REAL WORD situation. See for instance: https://t.co/FjkP5zLrh8 https://t.co/cB04jklNTr: N95 respirators were non-inferior to simple surgical masks but more expensive, uncomf and irritat to skin.

J

Justin

@justyj · X

@rosey_nz @nzherald @nntaleb Just in case that last tweet got lost, see the following meta-analysis: https://t.co/qPQoSYCIIx

J

Justin

@justyj · X

@rosey_nz @nzherald @nntaleb And of course there is actually strong scientific evidence regardless. This meta-analysis for example: https://t.co/qPQoSYCIIx

VP

Vanessa Campo-Ruiz, MD PhD

@VCSTX · X

RT @VCSTX: Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of #respiratory #viruses : implementing transmission barriers, isolat…

SS

steve hayes : also @shimself.bsky.social

@shimself · X

@Sime0nStylites @john_lichfield @Orgelword https://t.co/0Iboc4wQU1 they reduce the spread of infection

SS

steve hayes : also @shimself.bsky.social

@shimself · X

@trishgreenhalgh I always thought the SARS1 cochrane masks metastudy was a slam dunk https://t.co/0Iboc4wQU1 Anyway, what is the best new evidence please?

SS

steve hayes : also @shimself.bsky.social

@shimself · X

@LeahButlerSmith And I'll offer you a metastudy from the SARS1 outbreak in 2011. Masks reduced the spread of infection. Wear a mask ffs https://t.co/0Iboc4wQU1

T

Tiedonhaluinen

@Tiedonhalu · X

@1000histoires @kotkavirta https://t.co/m1jaqkiLKL The pooled case‐control studies, which focused on the SARS coronavirus (SARS CoV).... We found limited evidence of the superior effectiveness of devices such as the N95 respirator over simple surgical masks

T

Tiedonhaluinen

@Tiedonhalu · X

We found limited evidence of the superior effectiveness of devices such as the N95 respirator over simple surgical masks https://t.co/m1jaqkiLKL

P

pacózas

@balbulin1 · X

@Sumbaranasi @Dr_Luis @alcazar_miguel Este es uno de esos papanatas vendidos vamos a indicarle un estudio serio de verdad, lo hago por segunda vez. Para que no se le "pase" leerlo ente tanta respuesta https://t.co/SuCr3iKAQ7

P

pacózas

@balbulin1 · X

@Dr_Luis Aquí tiene ciencia https://t.co/SuCr3iKAQ7

DB

Dominic Barr

@DominicBarrDB · X

@NeilBer90555716 @CV2175911874 @ravencrime https://t.co/mL0bo8xp7k

MA

Mary Baker Art

@MaryBakerArt · X

RT @Bob_Wachter: 10/ As these evidence reviews (https://t.co/P5gACQxqaK & https://t.co/w8lWq99dDs) make clear, the debate is pretty well se…

MW

Matthew Wakefield

@genomematt · X

RT @Bob_Wachter: 10/ As these evidence reviews (https://t.co/P5gACQxqaK & https://t.co/w8lWq99dDs) make clear, the debate is pretty well se…

JB

Jessica Blois

@jessicablois · X

RT @Bob_Wachter: 10/ As these evidence reviews (https://t.co/P5gACQxqaK & https://t.co/w8lWq99dDs) make clear, the debate is pretty well se…

CF

Cynthia Fox

@cfoxthesound · X

RT @Bob_Wachter: 10/ As these evidence reviews (https://t.co/P5gACQxqaK & https://t.co/w8lWq99dDs) make clear, the debate is pretty well se…

KS

Kirsti Salo

@kiki_salo · X

RT @Bob_Wachter: 10/ As these evidence reviews (https://t.co/P5gACQxqaK & https://t.co/w8lWq99dDs) make clear, the debate is pretty well se…

LR

(((Liz Ditz))). Mask up, y'all. Viruses are real.

@lizditz · X

RT @Bob_Wachter: 10/ As these evidence reviews (https://t.co/P5gACQxqaK & https://t.co/w8lWq99dDs) make clear, the debate is pretty well se…

DS

Daniel Steinberg Singer

@DanielSingerS · X

RT @Bob_Wachter: 10/ As these evidence reviews (https://t.co/P5gACQxqaK & https://t.co/w8lWq99dDs) make clear, the debate is pretty well se…

NS

Noah Smith

@Noahpinion · X

RT @Bob_Wachter: 10/ As these evidence reviews (https://t.co/P5gACQxqaK & https://t.co/w8lWq99dDs) make clear, the debate is pretty well se…

SF

Suzanne Le Feuvre

@suzanneleq · X

RT @Bob_Wachter: 10/ As these evidence reviews (https://t.co/P5gACQxqaK & https://t.co/w8lWq99dDs) make clear, the debate is pretty well se…

C

cambria

@cambria39220855 · X

@mariaitapia https://t.co/mNNlWrmU1B

AF

Anna #CovidIsAirborne #KickoutRacism #FPHD

@Annawatton · X

RT @Bob_Wachter: 10/ As these evidence reviews (https://t.co/P5gACQxqaK & https://t.co/w8lWq99dDs) make clear, the debate is pretty well se…

AP

AntiMachineGunDeathInMassMurderistan = 2025ProLife

@deepvard · X

RT @Bob_Wachter: 10/ As these evidence reviews (https://t.co/P5gACQxqaK & https://t.co/w8lWq99dDs) make clear, the debate is pretty well se…

MC

Matt Calderone

@mcalderone · X

RT @Bob_Wachter: 10/ As these evidence reviews (https://t.co/P5gACQxqaK & https://t.co/w8lWq99dDs) make clear, the debate is pretty well se…

TS

THEE Gregory Stewart

@gstewtwo · X

RT @Bob_Wachter: 10/ As these evidence reviews (https://t.co/P5gACQxqaK & https://t.co/w8lWq99dDs) make clear, the debate is pretty well se…

D

DaSok

@DaSok · X

@landing_de @rikkuiper @mauricedehond Die er op wijzen dat 1,5 m besmetting vermindert. https://t.co/Cf7cZBMTkf. 2/2

C

cambria

@cambria39220855 · X

https://t.co/1adHeBAXve

C

cambria

@cambria39220855 · X

https://t.co/1adHeBAXve

PF

PESTY, François

@fpesty · X

L’efficacité des masques pour le grand public et les soignants n’est pourtant toujours pas démontrée d’après les deux revues méthodiques et méta-analyses de la Collaboration Cochrane : https://t.co/46LaqjvCDG et : https://t.co/JUN9zqykdO @EmmanuelMacron @EPhilippePM @olivierveran

C

cambria

@cambria39220855 · X

https://t.co/mNNlWrmU1B Publicado en la biblioteca Cochrane en 2011

Primeiro vídeo sobre avaliação crítica das coletivas do Ministério da Saúde sobre a tomada de decisão durante a pandemia do coronavírus! Informação de qualidade é poder, e poder é aqui no 9 minutos! O canal mais saudável do Brasil! https://t.co/2h0myf6Jlm via @YouTube

D

dominof

@dominof · X

#Cochrane #Systematicreview Physical Interventions to Interrupt or Reduce the Spread of Respiratory Viruses https://t.co/RAltJKOnEY #masks even #surgicalmasks likely the surgical mask will be the 2020 fashion statement of the year.

LZ

luiz antonio zam

@lazamb · X

@EduardoLeite_ Desconheço qualquer trabalho científico de vulto sobre o resultado do isolamento social em pandemias. Em 2011 temos essa publicação : https://t.co/v9WB7ybNyd

桜

桜河

@hayabusaboy2000 · X

RT @KotaHada: 頻繁な手洗いを行う事で、呼吸器のウイルス感染を約半分ぐらいに、抑えられます。 マスクも大事ですが、引き続き、手洗いを！！ https://t.co/1GEhqQLY1O

VV

Verónica M. Vidal

@VerMarVida · X

https://t.co/xkZr9QdJGd

ME

Mr. Eldredge

@citlanx · X

RT @MDiPaolaMD: Dear @Surgeon_General and @WHO please download/ read Chochrane review “Physical interventions to Interrupt or Reduce the Sp…

A

anonymouscaper

@anonymouscaper · X

RT @RKKimMD1: @ferrisjabr @WIRED Great article. Missed a systematic review from 2011 that was crystal clear on +benefit of masks. Stop publ…

RM

Richard K. Kim MD

@RKKimMD1 · X

@ferrisjabr @WIRED Great article. Missed a systematic review from 2011 that was crystal clear on +benefit of masks. Stop public #maskshaming and #WearAMask https://t.co/ss4fIGddNC

MD

Matthew DiPaola

@MDiPaolaMD · X

@Surgeon_General @who. There’s plenty of old data to review that would suggest you consider a different policy https://t.co/7YOgnvmvxL+ https://t.co/MGFAv6rJNF

CH

Chico_Hawk

@chico_hawk · X

RT @MDiPaolaMD: Dear @Surgeon_General and @WHO please download/ read Chochrane review “Physical interventions to Interrupt or Reduce the Sp…

GF

Greg F

@groggoose · X

RT @MDiPaolaMD: Dear @Surgeon_General and @WHO please download/ read Chochrane review “Physical interventions to Interrupt or Reduce the Sp…

MD

Matthew DiPaola

@MDiPaolaMD · X

Dear @Surgeon_General and @WHO please download/ read Chochrane review “Physical interventions to Interrupt or Reduce the Spread of Respiratory Viruses” and explain why the data support use of masks in public but you don’t. See pgs 29, 74, 129 and others https://t.co/7YOgnvmvxL+

AC

alain crawford

@alaincrawford · X

RT @roberta_zanchi: Les masques sont importants !!!Surgical masks or N95 respirators were the most consistent and comprehensive supportive…

RM

Richard K. Kim MD

@RKKimMD1 · X

@bylenasun @JoelAchenbach @lauriemcginley2 There’s already ample data showing +benefit of masks in airborne dz. CDC missed opportunity. #MaskShaming in public and at work needs to stop. https://t.co/ss4fIGddNC

RZ

Roberta Zanchi

@roberta_zanchi · X

Les masques sont importants !!!Surgical masks or N95 respirators were the most consistent and comprehensive supportive measures. There was limited evidence that social distancing was effective, especially if related to the risk of exposure. #COVID19 https://t.co/nGlu3t7vya

LL

Loser Leaves

@loserleaves · X

RT @ericsuh: @Pinboard The Cochrane Institute report says masks seem to have evidence of effective. Cochrane is the leading advocate and re…

ES

Eric Suh

@ericsuh · X

@Pinboard The Cochrane Institute report says masks seem to have evidence of effective. Cochrane is the leading advocate and resource for evidence-based medicine: https://t.co/jweuwCEZRJ

PO

Peter Oxley

@oxpeter · X

Systematic review of intervention effectiveness: "...virus spread can be prevented by hygienic measures, such as handwashing, especially around younger children. Benefit from reduced transmission from children to household members is broadly supported..." https://t.co/49y3UItEKF

Coronavírus: há evidências científicas? https://t.co/ipOeugVlnJ via @YouTube

No.: CD006207. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006207. pub4 (4) Brainard JS, Jones N, Lake I, et al. Facemasks and similar barriers to prevent respiratory illness ...

F

Dark Night - আঁধার রাত | Dhaka

Facebook

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub4 গত বছর কোভিড মহামারী শুরু হবার পর এডিনবরা ইউনিভার্সিটির এক রিপোর্টে বলা হয়েছে যে সামান্য ঘরে বানানো মাস্কও যদি আক্রান্ত ব্যক্তি পরে থাকে তাহলে সংক্রমণের হার ...

B

Hand disinfection and SARS-Cov-2 Robin Ferner, University of ...

Blogs

... the spread of respiratory viruses. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 7. Art. No.: CD006207. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub4.

N

Effectiveness of Personal Protective Measures in Reducing ...

News

7, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858 (CD006207. pub4). nonpharmaceutical intervention studies for pandemic influenza and current Jefferson, T., Jones, M.A. ...

N

Fünf Dinge, die man über Viren wissen sollte - Erkrankungen ...

News

[1] https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6 [2] https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008965.pub4 [3] https://www.nejm.org/doi/full ...

F

UK COVID-19 inquiry|30 Jun 2025. video creator @biologyphenom ...

Facebook

... pub4 Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC). I ... org/10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6 Goldman, E. (2020). Exaggerated ...

F

Which type of mask (N95 Mask or Surgical Mask) is best to deal with ...

Facebook

com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006207. pub4/references#CD006207-bbs2-0034)) which reports non‐inferiority between face barriers. Overall ...

F

Industry-certified N95 masks offer the best protection against ...

Facebook

com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006207. pub4/references#CD006207-bbs2-0034)) which reports non‐inferiority between face barriers. Overall ...

F

Effectiveness of N95 Masks in High-Risk Settings

Facebook

com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006207. pub4/references#CD006207-bbs2-0034)) which reports non‐inferiority between face barriers. Overall ...

F

Are standard surgical masks enough for hypersensitivity ...

Facebook

pub4/references#CD006207-bbs2-0034)) which reports non‐inferiority ... DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6. 19 August 2023 A population ...

T

Let's troubleshoot through what we can SEE and HEAR >>> We can ...

TikTok

... 10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6 doi: 10.3390/nu12051248. original ... doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003031.pub4 2️⃣ MYTH: The higher the ...

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2023, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD006207. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6. Authors. Jefferson T ...

F

Continuous use of N95 respirators was more efficacious against ...

Facebook

com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006207. pub4/references#CD006207-bbs2-0034)) which reports non‐inferiority between face barriers. Overall ...

F

The new N95 face mask can potentially be worn longer, causing ...

Facebook

com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006207. pub4/references#CD006207-bbs2-0034)) which reports non‐inferiority between face barriers. Overall ...

F

Respirator alternatives to surgical masks

Facebook

com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006207. pub4/references#CD006207-bbs2-0034)) which reports non‐inferiority between face barriers. Overall ...

F

Medical news for Cambodia - Facebook

Facebook

... CD006207. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub4. PMC 6993921. PMID 21735402. ^ a b "Up to 650 000 people die of respiratory diseases linked to ...

F

A Mask is better than a ventilator. Home is better than ICU ...

Facebook

com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006207. pub4/references#CD006207-bbs2-0034)) which reports non‐inferiority between face barriers. Overall ...

T

If your kids are sick, please keep them home — or everyone will ...

TikTok

... 10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6 doi: 10.3390/nu12051248. original ... doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003031.pub4 2️⃣ MYTH: The higher the ...

F

Has a weakened toxic environment allowed disease/viruses into our ...

Facebook

... pub4 Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC). I ... org/10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6 Goldman, E. (2020). Exaggerated ...

F

Notre Dame Fighting Irish Athletics - #WearAMask Wash your hands ...

Facebook

com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858. CD006207.pub4/abstract Uptake and effectiveness of facemask against respiratory infections at mass gatherings ...

B

Masking lack of evidence with politics | The Centre for Evidence ...

Blogs

No.: CD006207. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub4; Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses. Part 1 ...

com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858. CD006207. pub4/full?fbclid=IwAR0Id127daNfc7U6Ghig tCxLvo-UlsQc3gD0ytyK9- rWKJd89iK8zuMLbFk. cochranelibrary ...

F

These days, it is common to see health care professionals wearing ...

Facebook

com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006207. pub4/references#CD006207-bbs2-0034)) which reports non‐inferiority between face barriers. Overall ...

F

There has been confusion surrounding the types of N95 masks. The ...

Facebook

com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006207. pub4/references#CD006207-bbs2-0034)) which reports non‐inferiority between face barriers. Overall ...

F

Given the shortage of N95 respirators during this global outbreak of ...

Facebook

com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006207. pub4/references#CD006207-bbs2-0034)) which reports non‐inferiority between face barriers. Overall ...

B

Are interventions such as social distancing effective at reducing the ...

Blogs

Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011(7):CD006207. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub4 [published Online First: 2011/07/08]; Shaw K. The 2003 SARS ...

Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011(7):CD006207. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub4 [published Online First: 2011/07/08]. 11. Shaw K. The 2003 ...

N

Corona-Update: Wie wirksam wäre es, würden alle Bürger Masken ...

News

Cochrane Database Syst Rev2011;7:CD006207. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub4 pmid:21735402. 7. Cowling BJ, Zhou Y, Ip DK ...

N

Masken tragen – „Für die Wirksamkeit des Fallschirms braucht es ...

News

Cochrane Database Syst Rev2011;7:CD006207. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub4; Cowling BJ, Zhou Y, Ip DK, Leung GM, Aiello ...

... 10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub4/full?highlightAbstract=pandemic%7Cpandem. January, 2020: “It's going to be rare,” predicts Dr. Theresa Tam ...

F

CMO Dr. Parasram explains the difference between N95 and ...

Facebook

com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006207. pub4/references#CD006207-bbs2-0034)) which reports non‐inferiority between face barriers. Overall ...

N

¿Necesito hacerme una mascarilla?

News

Wiley, doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006207.pub4. Accessed 28 Mar 2020. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6993921/; Nishiura, Hiroshi et ...

F

What materials and patterns would be best for making face masks ...

Facebook

com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006207. pub4/references#CD006207-bbs2-0034)) which reports non‐inferiority between face barriers. Overall ...

com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006207. pub4/references#CD006207-bbs2-0034)) which reports non‐inferiority between face barriers. Overall ...

B

Hand Disinfectant and COVID-19 | The Centre for Evidence-Based ...

Blogs

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub4. Robin Ferner is a clinical pharmacologist at the School of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University ...

F

TÀI LIỆU HỮU ÍCH Bản dịch Hướng dẫn KSNK của WHO đối với ...

Facebook

... CD006207. Available at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.C D006207.pub4/abstract;jsessionid=074644E776469A4 ...

F

Happy N95 Day! … Sorry, force of habit. We mean, Happy ...

Facebook

com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006207. pub4/references#CD006207-bbs2-0034)) which reports non‐inferiority between face barriers. Overall ...

B

Health care workers must protect patients from influenza by taking ...

Blogs

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001269.pub4. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com ... 2010;(1):CD006207. Conflict of Interest: PD and TJ are a co ...