J Appl Behav Anal June 1990 PMID 2186017

Balancing the right to habilitation with the right to personal liberties: the rights of people with developmental disabilities to eat too many doughnuts and take a nap.

D J Bannerman, J B Sheldon, J A Sherman, A E Harchik

Full text PDF Download social card

Mentions

Peak: 2 in Mar 2021

across 4 sources since Apr 2018

Extended reach

2,736

potential audience

Total likes

Video views

2,487

Mentions per month

Apr 2018 – Apr 2025

Where it's discussed

Facebook10 posts
YouTube5 videos
X / Twitter1 posts
Bluesky1 posts

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The overall tone reveals enthusiasm and agreement, exemplified by comments like 'Quite possibly the best title ever,' which show an engaging and positive reception. The choice of words reflects admiration and curiosity, while the context suggests users are intrigued by the balance between freedoms and support for people with disabilities, emphasizing the article's relevance and provocative nature.

AgreementModerate agreement

Most discussions express strong support or appreciation for the article, highlighting its thought-provoking nature.

InterestHigh interest

Posts demonstrate high interest, especially with comments calling it 'the best title ever' and sharing enthusiasm for the topic.

EngagementModerate engagement

The engagement shows genuine participation, with some users sharing links and reactions, indicating thoughtful consideration.

ImpactModerate impact

The discussions hint at the article’s potential influence on perspectives regarding personal liberties and habilitation practices.

Abstract in brief

The text discusses the tension between providing effective support for people with developmental disabilities and respecting their personal freedoms, such as choosing daily activities like eating doughnuts or taking naps.
It highlights that service providers often control many aspects of clients' lives, which can limit personal liberties but may help achieve habilitation goals.
The paper explores the pros and cons of allowing clients to make their own choices, balancing the potential benefits of autonomy with the need to ensure successful development and legally protect clients' rights.]

Read the full abstract