Σχετική βιβλιογραφία: - Veronese N, Solmi M, Caruso MG, et al. Dietary fiber and health outcomes: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2018. - Brown L, Rosner B, Willett WW, Sacks FM. Cholesterol-lowering effects
Dietary fibre, whole grains, and risk of colorectal cancer: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies.
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
Jul 2020 – Oct 2026Where it's discussed
-
News59 articles
-
Facebook26 posts
-
Blogs18 articles
-
X / Twitter13 posts
-
YouTube3 videos
AI synopsis
What people are saying
The discussion centers on the BMJ/BMJ Clinical Research Ed. study linking higher dietary fibre and whole grains to reduced colorectal cancer risk. Posts predominantly reference or summarize supporting literature, cite DOIs, and call for more detailed data on fibre types and measurement error. Some posts challenge conclusions (e.g., “Carbs are bad” or “zero studies”), using absolute language or demanding additional RCTs. The tone mixes cautious endorsement with skepticism and curiosity, as readers highlight the evidence base (e.g., cereal/fruit fibre effects) and emphasize future research needs. Word choices like “benefit,” “not associated,” or “10 g of added dietary fibre” reflect attempts to align with the article’s dose-response message, while contrarian posts use absolutes or demand counter-evidence, shaping a nuanced but sometimes polarized discussion.
Overall, no single post entirely disagrees with the article; some skeptical/contrarian comments exist but many acknowledge the fiber/wheat findings or seek supporting research.
There is moderate interest evident, with some posts asking for evidence, citing specific studies, or summarizing the Brazilian/Portuguese/Japanese posts and inviting references.
Engagement is moderate: posters reference sources, quote DOIs, and challenge claims, indicating thoughtful discussion rather than shallow reactions.
The discussion signals a noticeable but not transformative impact: some readers push back or request more data, while others reiterate the study’s findings and implications.
Abstract in brief
- The systematic review and meta-analysis found that higher intake of dietary fibre, especially cereal fibre and whole grains, is associated with a reduced risk of developing colorectal cancer.
- Consuming an additional 10 grams of total dietary fibre daily lowers the risk, with strong evidence for fruit and cereal fibres, while vegetable and legume fibres show less consistent results.
- The study emphasizes the need for future research to provide more detailed data on different types of fibre, consider other risk factors, and evaluate how measurement errors may affect the results.]
Top posts
Most liked on X and Bluesky【大腸がんリスクを下げる生活習慣まとめ】 【運動習慣】 52の研究をまとめたメタ分析で 運動習慣がある人はない人と比べて 大腸がんリスクが24%低いことが 確認されています 国際的なガイドラインが推奨する目安は 週150分の中強度運動 (早歩き・水泳・サイクリングなど)です 【全粒穀物】
@BobPfalzgraf @EWardRD “Whole grains are bad”. Bro go home. https://t.co/TgxVSSh9II https://t.co/UABV5jFXsf https://t.co/iHkGfK7fYZ https://t.co/dbN35GqMTe https://t.co/lATsq9wLmh https://t.co/QrKdbiHokE https://t.co/HbSDrjTQRp https://t.co/cLOJRHDY1y https://t.co/KgH2UE8Gcf
@LonkyMD @CarnivoreMD Dagfinn Aune et al., “Dietary Fibre, Whole Grains, and Risk of Colorectal Cancer: Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta- Analysis of Prospective Studies,” BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 343 (November 10, 2011): d6617, https://t.co/Fhy4YYh8Dp
? Fontes Científicas: 1️⃣ Estudo NAD+: https://t.co/l42BaeNLFz 2️⃣ Fibras e Intestino: https://t.co/PD6VdgPbIy | https://t.co/voP8ZBKEN8 3️⃣ Proteína e Músculo: https://t.co/4zO1e9dHtG
@AgoristView @Tom_Babington1 @bhairya “Carbs are bad”. No. Would love to see the research you have.. https://t.co/TgxVSSh9II https://t.co/UABV5jFXsf https://t.co/iHkGfK7fYZ https://t.co/dbN35GqMTe https://t.co/lATsq9wLmh https://t.co/QrKdbiHokE https://t.co/HbSDrjTQRp https://t.co/cLOJRHDY1y https://t.co/KgH2UE8Gcf
All mentions
Dietary Fiber and Whole Grains Reduce Colorectal Cancer Risk
A meta-analysis shows that increasing dietary fiber intake by 10 grams daily reduces colorectal cancer risk. Foods like avocado, bran cereal, apples, beans, and chia seeds are good sources of fiber.
Food, Cancer Risk, and Real Science
Examining whether diet can prevent or treat cancer, debunking myth diets, and summarizing high-quality evidence and guidelines.
Calcium and Iron Sources in Plant-Based Diets for Bone and Heart Health
This video discusses the benefits of plant-based sources of calcium and iron, highlighting their roles in reducing osteoporosis risk in postmenopausal women and improving iron bioavailability. It also covers dietary…
Σχετική βιβλιογραφία: - Veronese N, Solmi M, Caruso MG, et al. Dietary fiber and health outcomes: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2018. - Brown L, Rosner B, Willett WW, Sacks FM. Cholesterol-lowering effects
【大腸がんリスクを下げる生活習慣まとめ】 【運動習慣】 52の研究をまとめたメタ分析で 運動習慣がある人はない人と比べて 大腸がんリスクが24%低いことが 確認されています 国際的なガイドラインが推奨する目安は 週150分の中強度運動 (早歩き・水泳・サイクリングなど)です 【全粒穀物】
? Fontes Científicas: 1️⃣ Estudo NAD+: https://t.co/l42BaeNLFz 2️⃣ Fibras e Intestino: https://t.co/PD6VdgPbIy | https://t.co/voP8ZBKEN8 3️⃣ Proteína e Músculo: https://t.co/4zO1e9dHtG
繊維で効果が強い。 主な根拠:Aune et al. (2011) Dietary fibre, whole grains, and risk of colorectal cancer: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies。 リンク: https://t.co/B2kEO8hgV7 3. 発酵食品(ヨーグルトなど乳製品) ヨーグルト摂取で大腸がん
But this doesn't matter anyway when you see that higher dietary fiber consumption is not associated with a higher risk of colon or rectal or colorectal cancer. It's the opposite, actually. DOI:10.1136/bmj.d6617 https://t.co/XFAAEgSeTH
@BigDDaddyCali @Rizabellepow @ErinGoBragh360 For “zero studies”, there are quite a lot of studies. https://t.co/K9nWH7UjJt https://t.co/yThaJaOFP2 https://t.co/ZUpsifIK83 https://t.co/dIki8pf5yG https://t.co/0W8EOja7oC and this is just what was in my read library.
@BigDDaddyCali @Rizabellepow @ErinGoBragh360 For “zero studies”, there are quite a lot of studies. https://t.co/K9nWH7UjJt https://t.co/yThaJaOFP2 https://t.co/ZUpsifIK83 https://t.co/dIki8pf5yG https://t.co/0W8EOja7oC and this is just what was in my read library.
@sdav1986 Disagree. Constipation & Dysbiosis (nothing for microbiome to eat) occur. Low dietary fibre is highly associated with Colorectal csncer https://t.co/izgVL7bkfL
@FacheuxSympa @solarpunkcult @Vertumne1 Revue systématique de 25 étude qui montre le bénéfice des fibres sur le k colorectal https://t.co/glOgkGpNBf
@Vote_ForPedro @raphaels7 i don't know of any RCTs in this area. (pretty rare for nutrition studies in general tbh). here's a meta-analysis of prospective studies showing 10% drop in risk for 10g of added dietary fiber https://t.co/W8NdNtmmSL
@LonkyMD @CarnivoreMD Dagfinn Aune et al., “Dietary Fibre, Whole Grains, and Risk of Colorectal Cancer: Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta- Analysis of Prospective Studies,” BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 343 (November 10, 2011): d6617, https://t.co/Fhy4YYh8Dp
@AgoristView @Tom_Babington1 @bhairya “Carbs are bad”. No. Would love to see the research you have.. https://t.co/TgxVSSh9II https://t.co/UABV5jFXsf https://t.co/iHkGfK7fYZ https://t.co/dbN35GqMTe https://t.co/lATsq9wLmh https://t.co/QrKdbiHokE https://t.co/HbSDrjTQRp https://t.co/cLOJRHDY1y https://t.co/KgH2UE8Gcf
@BobPfalzgraf @EWardRD “Whole grains are bad”. Bro go home. https://t.co/TgxVSSh9II https://t.co/UABV5jFXsf https://t.co/iHkGfK7fYZ https://t.co/dbN35GqMTe https://t.co/lATsq9wLmh https://t.co/QrKdbiHokE https://t.co/HbSDrjTQRp https://t.co/cLOJRHDY1y https://t.co/KgH2UE8Gcf
VK
水歳
CC
RV
RM
M
SC
?
S
DN
T
RS