Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
Some discussions highlighted key findings such as the heritability of IQ and other psychological traits, with commenters using phrases like 'evidence for the strong heritability' and '70% of IQ variance attributed to genetics.' The tone varies from enthusiastic endorsement of genetic influences to critical skepticism, underscoring a nuanced dialogue around the impact of genetics versus environment in shaping individual differences.
Many discussions reflect a shared acceptance of the study's conclusion about the genetic basis of psychological differences, although some express skepticism.
The discussions exhibit a high level of curiosity and debate about the findings, with many users eager to reference and analyze the original publication.
While posts engaged in discussing methodologies, not all showcased high depth, as some focused on surface-level reactions.
There is a strong belief among users that the study's findings have significant implications for understanding human psychology and intelligence.
The Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart found that an identical twin reared away from his co-twin has about an equal chance of being similar to the co-twin in terms of personality, interests, and attitudes as one who has been reared with his co-twin. https://t.co/3PBXUlCTt2
@oconick1 Bouchard's 1990 study on "twins reared apart" is a disgrace. It's either plain stupid, or scientific fraud. @ScienceMagazine should investigate @jayjoseph22's claim that the authors hid key fraternal twin data. If they did, the paper should be *retracted*. https://t.co/iZlK1NnrG1
Deuxièmement, vous dénoncez les résultats de Burt, mais vous omettez de mentionner que, même s'ils étaient sans doute en partie inventés, ils ont été répliqués par de multiples études, par exemple celle du Minnesota: https://t.co/sCRstWrjRV
@ToyeSodade @CathrynTownsend What about the possibility of retracting a very famous twin study, often cited by the HBD crowd, whose authors had to suppress and omit their control group data in order to arrive at their desired "strong heritability of IQ" conclusion? @RetractionWatch https://t.co/u8qybNfDng
sus
@ragcast @paulg @cremieuxrecueil Your guess is incorrect. https://t.co/m5b0MKtOcg
A long-term study of over 100 sets of twins and triplets raised apart shows that around 70% of IQ variance can be attributed to genetic differences. This video explores the implications of these findings on personality…
This video explores the impact of genetics on human behavior. A long-term study of twins indicates that approximately 70% of IQ variance is due to genetic differences. It highlights the balance between genetic…
What does IQ have to do with happiness? Despite polarizing evidence, this video explores the complex relationship between happiness and intelligence. We discuss the genetic influences on IQ variance and how these…
In this episode, we explore epigenetics and its impact on friendships and psychological traits. A long-term study revealed that about 70% of IQ variance can be attributed to genetics, with twins raised apart showing…
@e1ectric_hyena @GoldmanDesu @tverdohlebushek @andrey_pesatsky Да-да, ничего-то мы не знаем и ничего-то не допустимо. https://t.co/7Py2yuJRNk
@RakoonGamer2001 @JackPosobiec here's just one "link" https://t.co/XKsz0n4X0Y there are many others - Summary statement about genetics/DNA: "evidence for the strong heritability of most psychological traits" (behavioral traits for those who can't google)
@pamelasm @Acabrockyy @KillerAceUSAF @agraybee @AlphEatsCats https://t.co/lGQULtTVWB https://t.co/h3lvruNt4n https://t.co/3VJVARc8aE You dont have to believe me, just read these. All of these say that its 0.75 or higher so i guess the first guy was right and i was lowballing it my bad g.
@sandro955 @RnaudBertrand Citation: Bouchard, T. J., Lykken, D. T., McGue, M., Segal, N. L., & Tellegen, A. (1990). •Title: Sources of human psychological differences: The Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart •Journal: Science •DOI: 10.1126/science.2218526 •Citations: ~5,000+ •Key Findings:
@VladimirSuvor Bouchard, T. J., Lykken, D. T., McGue, M., Segal, N. L., & Tellegen, A. (1990). Sources of human psychological differences: The Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart. Science, 250(4978), 223–228. https://t.co/3xCNicaJHG
@Margueritestern Sources of Human Psychological Differences: The Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart (1990) : https://t.co/XMwWtQSOQN
@Empty_America @wil_da_beast630 “Sources of Human Psychological Differences: The Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart” (1990), by Thomas J. Bouchard Jr, David T. Lykken, Matthew McGue, Nancy L. Segal and Auke Tellegen | Embryo Project Encyclopedia https://t.co/81aHSii6sQ
@kaliyuga_surfer dont know about better or not but ur genetic history affects almost everything; more than parenting or environment across intelligence, personality, and behavior https://t.co/2cLBNyoggv
@EartherGraduate @Thumeros @ARLAINTS @grok @avaricum777 https://t.co/lO7nnCHGbq https://t.co/9OVrM85kRQ Thank you for your patience, here we have two studies showcasing the heritability and genetic nature of IQ(Intelligence). Safe to say that if it's genetic, then the IQ of Africans is also a genetic reality rather than environmental.
@MASolarborum @79Salao https://t.co/nGXID8J19e
@KommonOrigin @Uncommonsince76 All these scientific studies say you’re wrong. https://t.co/zF2VPyTK5i https://t.co/aN7MZ2rFjv https://t.co/Ov9L04p88e https://t.co/J4ll753y1e https://t.co/MZw7XhWJxz
@rebelhasaura @TheSpaniarAHTR Racial twin adoption studies prove this wrong though (Sources of human psychological differences: the Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart by Thomas J. Bouchard, cited over 2000 times). We are not equal, never will be.
@CdmxCiudad Hombre... si quieres, sabiendo que ni lo vas a leer, te pego captura de todas las páginas. Toma, ridículo: "Sources of Human Psychological Differences: the Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart." Science 250 (1990): p. 223–228.
@magicaltime123 @Akinyemisback @_Truthster @A_Damned_mk2 @WooWooSpaceJew @MeMaraCass @TheWayTheTruthX @Bumpalump99 @downs1nthehouse @godrottdot1 @timmbosliceeee @merhart2112 @Raven4212 @Simple_Shaman @Melanie33720945 @1pckt @horusrage @AtheistsAssembl @SecularSmurf @GaryHeron2 @JPopiden55707 @Atroe_Cious @VaxxCauseSIDS @Wolfpak561 @gmcnuggetz @1Quetzalcoatl1 @TBRagsdale1 @enitas13 @MindfulDamage @angusintheditch @_Woobie @YouKneelToZod @pray2pesci @islandsky72 @ScientiaPercept @JudyM32174 @2col6 @LordLaneus @OddBackgrowy @TheCookieSavior @BillyBhold @Messenger_187 @Galacton2 @kali8989 @IrisB42744268 @KuriousChristos @MilesMosley6662 @thewordroomyt @james_jabroni The Minnesota Twins study was a landmark piece of research, in which they conducted a longitudinal study of identical twins separated at birth and raised in different families. Their tentative conclusions was, in fact, about 50/
@feathercolibri @PierroLaO1 @Gen_Sank Plomin, R., Deary, I. J. (2015). Genetics and intelligence differences: five special findings. Molecular Psychiatry, 20, 98–108. Bouchard, T. J. et al. (1990). Sources of human psychological differences: the Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart. Science, 250(4978), 223–228.
@TheoFruitier @Ian_031_ @Yohdono @Ad_Vitam44_ https://t.co/kDYJwwVpiG Il est peut-être temps de s'intéresser à la science quand on parle de science non?
RT @JeReinforme: Source : https://t.co/emmM3dDbon
RT @JeReinforme: Source : https://t.co/emmM3dDbon
Source : https://t.co/emmM3dDbon
@pytagorean666 > In order for that identity to rematerialize in the proper way, it requires a host that is of the same biological species, sex, and race. trivial cases can be observed in monozygotic twins separated at birth and reared by separate, distant families https://t.co/iLH7zXs63b
@UltimaThule1000 @xCryptoEmpire @BostonTea84 ...podobnie między rodzicami i dziećmi (odsyłam do krzyżówek ponownie). Za to nie ma różnic między bliźniakami jednojajowymi wychowywanymi w różnych warunkach (Sources of Human Psychological Differences: The Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart)
@xCryptoEmpire @BostonTea84 @UltimaThule1000 https://t.co/uTDr6ANmVb to nie teza tylko fakt potwierdzony badaniami. Luknij na to podlinkowane, i na to: Sources of Human Psychological Differences: The Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart
RT @iointelresearch: The Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart found that an identical twin reared away from his co-twin has about an equal…
@MortTheMortal @mirrex69 @celebert4321 @ManiaPendragon @OliwiaGako20163 Thomas Bouchard (1990) – “Sources of Human Psychological Differences: The Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart”
RT @davidbessis: @oconick1 Bouchard's 1990 study on "twins reared apart" is a disgrace. It's either plain stupid, or scientific fraud. @Sci…
@ScottRagan @bobbyorbust @BasedTorba For someone who purportedly used this in the classroom, you sure missed this major conclusion of his … https://t.co/tjHGWccVEP
@wise_d_guy @HandsomeVb @CScharun Here you don't go: Bei Bouchard et al, 1990, wurden die Zwillinge zwar getrennt, sind aber im gleichen Kulturkreis aufgewachsen. https://t.co/lzpMgQlBFT
RT @davidbessis: @oconick1 Bouchard's 1990 study on "twins reared apart" is a disgrace. It's either plain stupid, or scientific fraud. @Sci…
لمن يريد الاطلاع على الدراسة: https://t.co/Do9MyDu8oh
RT @davidbessis: @oconick1 Bouchard's 1990 study on "twins reared apart" is a disgrace. It's either plain stupid, or scientific fraud. @Sci…
@oconick1 Bouchard's 1990 study on "twins reared apart" is a disgrace. It's either plain stupid, or scientific fraud. @ScienceMagazine should investigate @jayjoseph22's claim that the authors hid key fraternal twin data. If they did, the paper should be *retracted*. https://t.co/iZlK1NnrG1
@JxnW @SangerPilled of the varience isnt likely to be due to the social environment but due to epigenetic differences. The concordane rates for a bunch of personality traits dont change that much if identical twins are raised apart vs together https://t.co/m41YB42gDv https://t.co/IHj4KqHPGw
ここらへんか ・Sources of human psychological differences: The Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart. Science, 250(4978), 223-228. ・Plomin, R., & DeFries, J. C. (1998). The genetics of cognitive abilities and disabilities. Scientific American, 278(5), 62-69.
Since 1979, a continuing study of monozygotic and dizygotic twins, separated in infancy and reared apart, has subjected more than 100 sets of reared-apart twins… https://t.co/VYU88tfWMu
@milachka2001 @benwilbrink @TCanegem @FeysRaf "Joseph has violated the ‘total evidence rule’ (Lubinski, Reference Lubinski2000, p. 443). He has fooled himself. His work is not science — it is, to use Feynman’s term, pseudoscience." https://t.co/0suOoso5hi https://t.co/icV2DGZ1eu https://t.co/P87tUrOjFQ
@DrugGovoruna Stancil is the typical Prog clown. The man who wants to “decarbonize everything” (see here: https://t.co/e1DmcSuBTC)
@AllyFogg @s7c20 @TheTinMenBlog @ABLawman @alattice2 @CCriadoPerez @MBCoalition Watch it at your leisure. Buy her book. Read the USA study. Whatever takes your fancy. But be prepared to feel deeply uncomfortable with your orthodoxy. It’s built on sand.. The twins reared apart study https://t.co/iN2YXkYE5H
RT @PaoloShirasi: The Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart found that an identical twin reared away from his co-twin has about an equal ch…
RT @PaoloShirasi: The Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart found that an identical twin reared away from his co-twin has about an equal ch…
@BronskiJoseph About 70% of IQ is genetic, most personality traits are also mainly genetic, see Bouchard TJ Jr, et al Sources of human psychological differences: the Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart. Science. 1990 Oct 12;250(4978):223-8. PMID: 2218526.
RT @PaoloShirasi: The Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart found that an identical twin reared away from his co-twin has about an equal ch…
RT @PaoloShirasi: The Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart found that an identical twin reared away from his co-twin has about an equal ch…
RT @PaoloShirasi: The Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart found that an identical twin reared away from his co-twin has about an equal ch…
RT @PaoloShirasi: The Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart found that an identical twin reared away from his co-twin has about an equal ch…
RT @PaoloShirasi: The Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart found that an identical twin reared away from his co-twin has about an equal ch…
RT @PaoloShirasi: The Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart found that an identical twin reared away from his co-twin has about an equal ch…
RT @PaoloShirasi: The Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart found that an identical twin reared away from his co-twin has about an equal ch…
RT @PaoloShirasi: The Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart found that an identical twin reared away from his co-twin has about an equal ch…
RT @PaoloShirasi: The Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart found that an identical twin reared away from his co-twin has about an equal ch…
RT @PaoloShirasi: The Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart found that an identical twin reared away from his co-twin has about an equal ch…
RT @PaoloShirasi: The Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart found that an identical twin reared away from his co-twin has about an equal ch…
RT @PaoloShirasi: The Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart found that an identical twin reared away from his co-twin has about an equal ch…
RT @PaoloShirasi: The Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart found that an identical twin reared away from his co-twin has about an equal ch…
RT @PaoloShirasi: The Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart found that an identical twin reared away from his co-twin has about an equal ch…
The Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart found that an identical twin reared away from his co-twin has about an equal chance of being similar to the co-twin in terms of personality, interests, and attitudes as one who has been reared with his co-twin. https://t.co/3PBXUlCTt2
@OilfieldSlang @Steve_Sailer @therecount Behavior is ~75% genetic https://t.co/xWvDbIylWD
@oneeyedsnake64 @1millionspiders @theserfstv Red makes us feel anger, green makes us feel relaxed. You can isolate a person from society and these responses or "behaviours" towards color would persist Also there was a study done in twins that grew up in different families. Sorry it's behind a paywall https://t.co/ckg3FUyw1j
RT @DialecticBio: sus
sus
@CirclEdgeInc The Jensen source is a book chapter: https://t.co/lbd11zlOus The Minnesotan data is from Bouchard et al.: https://t.co/SfaMxgoOgb
@ragcast @paulg @cremieuxrecueil Your guess is incorrect. https://t.co/m5b0MKtOcg
Deuxièmement, vous dénoncez les résultats de Burt, mais vous omettez de mentionner que, même s'ils étaient sans doute en partie inventés, ils ont été répliqués par de multiples études, par exemple celle du Minnesota: https://t.co/sCRstWrjRV
@geostylegeo Exactly none. 0% https://t.co/qxCe5eL5Jv
RT @condensedbold: @Cittairlanie Parents’ Emotion-Related Beliefs Predict Children's Recog.of Emotion https://t.co/BjGrAoWVoC Sources of H…
RT @condensedbold: @Cittairlanie Parents’ Emotion-Related Beliefs Predict Children's Recog.of Emotion https://t.co/BjGrAoWVoC Sources of H…
@Cittairlanie Parents’ Emotion-Related Beliefs Predict Children's Recog.of Emotion https://t.co/BjGrAoWVoC Sources of Human Psychological Differences https://t.co/bTOerHwjZm Personality resemblances in adoptive families when the children are late-adolescent or adult https://t.co/l2mTWKnV15
@CosmicDD @LaBaronneuh @Noemie80045361 @BastosP8 Bonjour madame. Non. https://t.co/yHNdG6P1cT
@kox1941 @FittingMechani1 @StefanFSchubert @Nrg8000 It's famous enough a simple search would find it for you. But here, monozygotic twin study, one of the gold standards in research: https://t.co/2TeoAcWpfB
@johannes9126 @who_is_Annett Hier noch ein paar spannende Links die sie Aufklären sollten https://t.co/PKO1JLsvsf https://t.co/vLkr1Cwxki https://t.co/9EkUUdwzvk https://t.co/4L4JnfPYxC https://t.co/ERcOMIacLe
1/ In Bouchard's famous 1990 Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart IQ study (Science magazine), reared-apart DZ twin (DZA) control group correlations (r's) were omitted "due to space limitations and the smaller size of the DZA sample (30 sets)." https://t.co/u8qybNfDng https://t.co/xuv1Wh5cYb
@jasonwalters85 Ik ben toch benieuwd waar je dat 'vrijwel identiek' op baseert, want in een bekende studie van Thomas Bouchard e.a., 'Sources of Human Psychological Differences: The Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart', (Science, 1990) lees ik toch echt iets anders. https://t.co/V1dNugiO07
@jayjoseph22 @HowethLewis Here's 8 twin studies, showing that your count of 6 is wrong. And since you misrepresent my beliefs, you're blocked. https://t.co/CHVkNkVUnI https://t.co/i0W4CSmTMj https://t.co/oJ5XDSLTKu https://t.co/i9mXOh6biM https://t.co/MT3RpyEIJj https://t.co/u48TuWmk1E
@rdsgonnagetyou @ScottAdamsSays Are races equal? IQ is 70% genetics. https://t.co/IPZtVVDpwu
@lmcheifetz Genetics explain 70% of IQ. You haven't noticed yet, I am telling you ACCEPTED SCIENCE. CDC>NIH>HHS> https://t.co/IPZtVVDpwu
@JoyAnnReid One tenet of CRT is, 'All people are equally endowed and so the only reason of inequitable outcomes is racism. ...but Human Genome Project shows human DNA varies over 12% worldwide and success (IQ) is 70% hereditary (Minnesota Twins Testing). CDC>NIH>HHS> https://t.co/IPZtVVDpwu
RT @jayjoseph22: @ToyeSodade @CathrynTownsend What about the possibility of retracting a very famous twin study, often cited by the HBD cro…
RT @jayjoseph22: @ToyeSodade @CathrynTownsend What about the possibility of retracting a very famous twin study, often cited by the HBD cro…
@ToyeSodade @CathrynTownsend What about the possibility of retracting a very famous twin study, often cited by the HBD crowd, whose authors had to suppress and omit their control group data in order to arrive at their desired "strong heritability of IQ" conclusion? @RetractionWatch https://t.co/u8qybNfDng
RT @jayjoseph22: How about "concern" re this ultra-famous "reared-apart" twin study as well, where the control group results (DZAs) were su…
How about "concern" re this ultra-famous "reared-apart" twin study as well, where the control group results (DZAs) were suppressed in order to arrive at the desired "strong heritability of IQ" conclusions. https://t.co/u8qybNfDng https://t.co/orTFmwMM9e https://t.co/157C7iDntS https://t.co/cEryksVCS0
@talicos @twitnewsaccount @OTMsuyaya @gogriffsgo32 @Ray_Velsaquez @decentbirthday If you're interested, here is a well-known one: https://t.co/BZQehXKuEm Essentially, twins reared apart (thus in different environmental conditions) were used to estimate an IQ heritability of about 0.7. To put that into perspective, the heritability of height is about 0.79.
@Mei_Ubermensch @NOMporvenir @PredicadorCrew Estudio de gemelos monocigoticos y dicigoticos separados en adopcion. 70% de la vatianza en CI explicada por factores geneticos, se tiende a converger en CI con los padres biologicos, no los putativos/tutores. https://t.co/dhV0je58ED
@VeteranEU @feelsocleanlik1 But for instance https://t.co/6wxvLg1TYW estimates the cognitive ability heritability up to 80%. https://t.co/Q5HDrRdu3O 70%.
@C_Kavanagh @Steve_Sailer @_HelenDale @CathyYoung63 @EPoe187 @K_Niemietz (2/2) then for accepting funding from it. For instance, here's who funded the Minnesota study of twins reared apart 10.1126/science.2218526: Pioneer, Seaver Institute, UMinnesota grad school, Koch f., Spencer f., NSF, NIMH, National Institute on Aging, and Harcourt publishing.