Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The overall sentiment across these discussions is quite skeptical, with many posts citing meta-analyses that question the efficacy of psychoanalytic approaches, especially long-term techniques. Words like 'questionable,' 'lack of quality,' and references to effect sizes highlight a critical tone, emphasizing the publications' role in challenging traditional views and suggesting limited real-world impact.
Most discussions highlight the lack of strong evidence supporting the effectiveness of long-term psychoanalytic psychotherapy, indicating broad disagreement with positive claims.
While some posts show mild interest in the topic, many are more critical or neutral, reflecting a moderate level of curiosity rather than passionate engagement.
Several discussions reference meta-analyses, study quality, and effect sizes, demonstrating some engagement but generally at a superficial level.
The general tone suggests that these discussions view the publication as confirming skepticism about LTPP’s benefits, thus exerting limited influence on practice or opinion.
Psikoanalitik psikoterapi efektifliğine dair randomize kontrollü deneylerin meta analizi. Hem p değerleri hem etki büyüklükleri, diğer psikoterapi yöntemlerinden etkili olmadığına işaret ediyor. Fakat çalışma kaliteleri epey düşük genel olarak. https://t.co/ycTHnVmPIH
Smit, Huibers, Ioannidis, et al.on the (lack of) effectiveness of long-term psychoanalytic psychotherapy, followed by a flurry of re-analyses, comments etc. https://t.co/atYbU7d4xl
@jmlopezlaso @EdgarArtacho Sobre la eficacia del psicoanálisis: Los metaanálisis muestran falta de calidad de los estudios (sorprende que se publiquen). Tamaños de efecto pequeños y la falta de calidad en estudios no elimina factores confundentes y grupos de control inadecuados. https://t.co/DvtsD00MKg
@enGramaPsico @EdgarArtacho @Olvidadizo2 @PsiqueCarlos @FasceAngelo https://t.co/oYC1bd7dOo
@IngelaPsi Muy cierto. Muchas formas de terapia funcionan justo porque la gente comienza a hablar de sus problemas y darse cuenta de cosas. Pero la evidencia sobre la efectividad de la terapia psicoanalítica a largo plazo es, cuando menos, cuestionable. https://t.co/Mr1eiI65Ld https://t.co/MwoBzUNB2C
@uhcensored Ki aslında buradaki "modest success" dediği şeyin de hatrı sayılır bir kısmı psikoterapiye atfedilen regression to the mean etkisi muhtemelen. Bir psikoterapi tekniğinin efektifliğiyle ilgili priorlar düşük olmalı. Şunu gördüm de oradan aklıma geldi: https://t.co/ycTHnVmPIH
This review discusses the effectiveness of psychodynamic therapy across various mental health disorders, highlighting benefits for depression, anxiety, eating disorders, and somatic conditions, especially long-term PDT…
@falsetown @Escroquette1 @Hugo_Baup @CedricRostein @LouiseOdessa @ChocMeta @MORGANE15021973 @franceinter @mediatriceRF @HAS_sante @instagram Ou pas https://t.co/QTShE5OO1H
@IngelaPsi Muy cierto. Muchas formas de terapia funcionan justo porque la gente comienza a hablar de sus problemas y darse cuenta de cosas. Pero la evidencia sobre la efectividad de la terapia psicoanalítica a largo plazo es, cuando menos, cuestionable. https://t.co/Mr1eiI65Ld https://t.co/MwoBzUNB2C
@leticiakawano @PauloLotufo @mbello Vou insistir que há evidência melhor refutando a sua hipótese e essa meta-análise do JAMA que sugere um tamanho de efeito irreal de 0,94 p/ LTPP. https://t.co/tEdT4e6y37
@joos_stef @jdceulaer Onafhankelijke meta-analyses tonen aan dat er geen effecten zijn van klassieke psychoanalyse boven controleconditie, in tegenstelling tot andere therapiestromingen, zoals moderne psychodynamische therapie. https://t.co/SjUTd38rLV
@enGramaPsico @EdgarArtacho @Olvidadizo2 @PsiqueCarlos @FasceAngelo https://t.co/oYC1bd7dOo
RT @RamonNogueras: @jmlopezlaso @EdgarArtacho Sobre la eficacia del psicoanálisis: Los metaanálisis muestran falta de calidad de los estudi…
RT @RamonNogueras: @jmlopezlaso @EdgarArtacho Sobre la eficacia del psicoanálisis: Los metaanálisis muestran falta de calidad de los estudi…
@jmlopezlaso @EdgarArtacho Sobre la eficacia del psicoanálisis: Los metaanálisis muestran falta de calidad de los estudios (sorprende que se publiquen). Tamaños de efecto pequeños y la falta de calidad en estudios no elimina factores confundentes y grupos de control inadecuados. https://t.co/DvtsD00MKg
@uhcensored Ki aslında buradaki "modest success" dediği şeyin de hatrı sayılır bir kısmı psikoterapiye atfedilen regression to the mean etkisi muhtemelen. Bir psikoterapi tekniğinin efektifliğiyle ilgili priorlar düşük olmalı. Şunu gördüm de oradan aklıma geldi: https://t.co/ycTHnVmPIH
Psikoanalitik psikoterapi efektifliğine dair randomize kontrollü deneylerin meta analizi. Hem p değerleri hem etki büyüklükleri, diğer psikoterapi yöntemlerinden etkili olmadığına işaret ediyor. Fakat çalışma kaliteleri epey düşük genel olarak. https://t.co/ycTHnVmPIH
RT @IoanaA_Cristea: Smit, Huibers, Ioannidis, et al.on the (lack of) effectiveness of long-term psychoanalytic psychotherapy, followed by a…
Smit, Huibers, Ioannidis, et al.on the (lack of) effectiveness of long-term psychoanalytic psychotherapy, followed by a flurry of re-analyses, comments etc. https://t.co/atYbU7d4xl
@keithohanlon @BigBoyBoris12 @DikmenMec @jordanbpeterson So it seems in: Yolba Smit et al., The effectiveness of long-term psychoanalytic psychotherapy—A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, Clinical Psychology Review, Volume 32, Issue 2, 2012
TH
IC
RN
T
BJ
JG
TV
WO
EM
FN
SW