何十年もの間、内分泌かく乱化学物質(EDC)の研究は、毒性学における伝統的な概念、特に「用量が毒を作る」というドグマに挑戦してきた。 EDCへの環境暴露がヒトの疾患や障害と関連していることを疫学研究が示している。 https://t.co/0NXj2QDo32
Hormones and endocrine-disrupting chemicals: low-dose effects and nonmonotonic dose responses.
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
Jan 2017 – Oct 2025Where it's discussed
-
News46 articles
-
X / Twitter21 posts
-
Blogs20 articles
-
Facebook16 posts
-
YouTube3 videos
-
Reddit2 posts
AI synopsis
What people are saying
The discussions reflect a consensus that low-dose effects and nonmonotonic dose-responses are scientifically significant, exemplified by references to studies like Vandenberg et al., and critiques of outdated toxicology principles such as Paracelsus's 'dose makes the poison.' Words like 'eye-opening,' 'crucial,' and 'must change' underscore the perceived impact of the research, with many emphasizing the need for reform in testing and regulation.
Most discussions strongly support the article's findings about low-dose effects and nonmonotonic responses in endocrine disruptors.
Participants showcase high interest, referencing studies, scientific principles, and calling for regulatory changes, indicating they value the topic.
Discussions involve detailed explanations, examples like Tamoxifen's dose-dependent effects, and references to scientific literature, demonstrating deep engagement.
Many posts argue for substantial scientific and regulatory re-evaluation, emphasizing the importance and urgency of understanding low-dose chemical effects on health.
Abstract in brief
- This text explains how endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) can cause effects even at very low doses, challenging traditional toxicology that assumes higher doses are more harmful.
- It introduces the concepts of low-dose effects, which happen around typical human exposure levels, and nonmonotonic dose-response curves, where the relationship between dose and effect isn't straightforward and can change direction within the dose range.
- The authors argue that because low doses of EDCs can impact health and these effects are supported by scientific studies, new testing methods are necessary to better understand and protect human health from these chemicals.]
Top posts
Most liked on X and Bluesky1/2 @kevinfolta You clearly don’t understand non-monotonicity. Simple example. Tamoxifen is used to treat breast cancer. At high doses it suppresses tumor growth. At low doses, ~1000-fold beneath the NOEAL, it promotes tumor growth. Data in https://t.co/wz6D39JhjO https://t.co/NBsfsa8KS5
Rather, numerous experiments with chemicals that act via hormonal mechanisms have shown that it is very common for the dose-response curve to be non-monotonic and have notable health effects at low doses below current safety limits. 12/n https://t.co/bS8nSyZUZr https://t.co/6Ibv7dkSh2
The endocrine system has revealed U-shaped (nonmonotonic) and nonlinear exposure-response functions, as explained by @ElleEnvy https://t.co/SI4PQO94Dl 2/
@ktibus @CaulfieldTim @thehill @unbiasedscipod @CropLifeAmerica Her entire article is based on a flawed assumption about toxicology. https://t.co/dT5DgEpYo3
@tarahaelle @HomegrownJoan2 @vixenvalentino @IWF Ya' kinda' wanna' stop. Nobody but industry hacks cite Paracelsus and "dose makes the poison." https://t.co/VmRdpFDqH8
All mentions
Assessing BPA Risks and Alternatives in Consumer Products
BPA has a controversial reputation. We explore the science behind its health impacts, why manufacturers avoid it, and evaluate the safety of alternatives like BPS and BPF based on recent research.
Understanding Low-Dose Effects of Endocrine Disruptors on Health
This video explains how endocrine-disrupting chemicals can cause effects at very low doses, challenging traditional toxicology, and emphasizes the need for new testing methods to better understand health impacts.
Understanding How Hidden Toxins Affect Your Health and Wellness.
Explore how everyday chemical exposures impact health, from polluted air to food chemicals. Learn practical tips to protect yourself, reduce risks, and improve overall wellness.
@TBDD_yahoo 環境ホルモン≒ホルモンかく乱物質に関しては最近いくつも査読付き論文がでていますが、当然TBDD(モデルナ4回接種済)様に置かれましてはご承知の事と思います 念の為レスしておきますね① Hormones and endocrine-disrupting chemicals: low-dose effects and nonmonotonic dose responses https://t.co/EYNYR1VCcH
@henningAEO @jeremyfromga @MeidasTouch The study the German Wiki quotes ("Hormones and endocrine-disrupting chemicals: low-dose effects and nonmonotonic dose responses" L. N. Vandenberg, T. Colborn, T. B. Hayes et al) is also reference on English Wiki, which includes additional sources that 1/
@ktibus @CaulfieldTim @thehill @unbiasedscipod @CropLifeAmerica Her entire article is based on a flawed assumption about toxicology. https://t.co/dT5DgEpYo3
RT @Alzhacker: 何十年もの間、内分泌かく乱化学物質(EDC)の研究は、毒性学における伝統的な概念、特に「用量が毒を作る」というドグマに挑戦してきた。 EDCへの環境暴露がヒトの疾患や障害と関連していることを疫学研究が示している。 https://t.co/0NXj…
何十年もの間、内分泌かく乱化学物質(EDC)の研究は、毒性学における伝統的な概念、特に「用量が毒を作る」というドグマに挑戦してきた。 EDCへの環境暴露がヒトの疾患や障害と関連していることを疫学研究が示している。 https://t.co/0NXj2QDo32
"We conclude that when nonmonotonic dose-response curves occur, the effects of low doses cannot be predicted by the effects observed at high doses. Thus, fundamental changes in chemical testing and safety determination are needed to protect human health." -https://t.co/zfVCleWWAl
@RizziEmmanuel @GreensEFA @AssoPollinis @wienerofficial @gruffat_claude @RipaManuela @galleerie @DamienCAREME @rosadamato634 @msaraswati @JuttaPaulusRLP @FGuerreiroMEP @ph_lamberts That's an old myth. Not for endocrine disruptors. #EDCs https://t.co/OChAAvfBIH
@Thoughtscapism @jm_desp @TreeFarmerBC @scarlenn @UusivuoriVille @agowa338 The first article cited is actually excellent and should be read. But generally, regulators are only starting to look at this. And looking at in vivo experiments with obesogens is eye opening and very significant, contrary to what your articles concludes https://t.co/UUvbEpI7u0
RT @petemyers: 1/2 @kevinfolta You clearly don’t understand non-monotonicity. Simple example. Tamoxifen is used to treat breast cancer. A…
RT @petemyers: 1/2 @kevinfolta You clearly don’t understand non-monotonicity. Simple example. Tamoxifen is used to treat breast cancer. A…
1/2 @kevinfolta You clearly don’t understand non-monotonicity. Simple example. Tamoxifen is used to treat breast cancer. At high doses it suppresses tumor growth. At low doses, ~1000-fold beneath the NOEAL, it promotes tumor growth. Data in https://t.co/wz6D39JhjO https://t.co/NBsfsa8KS5
@tarahaelle @HomegrownJoan2 @vixenvalentino @IWF Ya' kinda' wanna' stop. Nobody but industry hacks cite Paracelsus and "dose makes the poison." https://t.co/VmRdpFDqH8
RT @leotrasande: The endocrine system has revealed U-shaped (nonmonotonic) and nonlinear exposure-response functions, as explained by @Elle…
The endocrine system has revealed U-shaped (nonmonotonic) and nonlinear exposure-response functions, as explained by @ElleEnvy https://t.co/SI4PQO94Dl 2/
https://t.co/Kvr0sElnCn
@MacLesggy je vous invite à revoir vos postulats qui datent un peu (paracelse) et lire L. Vandeberg : "Hormones and endocrine-disrupting chemicals : Low-dose effects and nonmonotonic dose responses"
Rather, numerous experiments with chemicals that act via hormonal mechanisms have shown that it is very common for the dose-response curve to be non-monotonic and have notable health effects at low doses below current safety limits. 12/n https://t.co/bS8nSyZUZr https://t.co/6Ibv7dkSh2
@AviBittMD I appreciate you were taught Paracelsian toxicology: “only the dose makes something a poison.” Times and science have changed much since then. Little things matter. Dismissing small changes in exposure as minuscule is scientifically inaccurate. https://t.co/SI4PQNRteL
https://t.co/83vr7WxMAP https://t.co/yqSA5Ioru5
@MSteilemann We met w FDA before publishing this paper https://t.co/CAaNDrqIR4 The scientist I met with said "We don't see patterns like that." I said "Of course not. You don't test those low doses." She said: "Oh, you're right." Now she works for product defense company, earns 10x FDA salary
@ehn Sigh. Wow so that's you, huh? Vandenberg et al. (2012). Hormones and Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals: Low-dose Effects and Nonmonotonic Dose Responses. Endocrine Reviews. First published ahead of print March 14, 2012 as doi:10.1210/er.2011-1050