Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The discussions demonstrate a strong interest in the neurobiological evidence presented, with multiple posts referencing specific studies and citing neuroimaging techniques, reflecting both curiosity and a desire for scientific validation. The tone varies from enthusiastic support emphasizing the authenticity of DID, to some skepticism about methods, illustrating a nuanced engagement with the research's implications and validity.
Many discussions acknowledge the validity of the research, emphasizing neurobiological evidence supporting authentic DID states.
Posts are highly focused on the scientific findings and debates about trauma versus suggestibility theories, showing strong engagement.
Discussions include references to specific studies, methods, and potential applications like neuroimaging, indicating in-depth involvement.
The conversations suggest that the research could influence clinical understanding and diagnostic approaches, although some comments are more speculative.
@CABeck1961 @sammy_lianne (Sorry 4 the notification spam!) PS. In this 2012 study deliberate alter switching in people with DID was compared to high and low fantasy prone actors. Only the genuine DID patients showed the typical brain and circulatory system psychobiological changes. https://t.co/ibNEHbDcnF
Persevere! 6th attempt (first whole brain study to show cortical and subcortical structural aberrations in DID): https://t.co/Q8dpvIAReH 4th attempt (first study to dismiss the Fantasy model for DID on the basis of neurobiological data): https://t.co/WnhmYHxxzL https://t.co/rcw3aQY71a
@FndPortal 1) See paper from Vissia et al. 2016 that tests the Trauma and Fantasy model for DID - download here: https://t.co/IaoukTWWe2 and https://t.co/JUIZ555YoG 2) Identity-state dependent blood flow patterns are not related to fantasy proneness: https://t.co/WnhmYHxxzL
I understand your reservations and I'm not asking you to believe my account but I'd appreciate it if after you read further you considered a more empathetic approach towards people affected by DID. Whether or not you believe in it's existence or validity. https://t.co/oALjIU092w
@WhiteNervosa It would help for Destiny to like, look up anything about this rather than just appeal to his intuition of disgust: https://t.co/jzQ9aIWAR1
by The Three Trauma Amigos. They claim Reinders studies provide "scientific evidence" that DID "is real". Here's one: https://t.co/CZpoSS3Zhy
This video explores whether dissociative identity states in individuals with DID are genuine or roleplayed. Evidence shows distinct brain activity and physiological responses in DID patients, supporting the authenticity…
This video explores whether dissociative identity states in individuals with DID are authentic or simulated. The research shows that brain activity differences suggest these states are real and biologically based, not…
This video explores whether dissociative identity states are genuine or role-induced, highlighting research showing distinct brain activity and physiological responses in DID patients, supporting its authenticity as a…
This episode explores the challenges in psychiatry, focusing on Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID). It investigates whether DID states are genuine mental states, supported by differences in brain activity, challenging…
This video provides proof that DID is a genuine psychiatric condition, debunking myths and highlighting research showing distinct brain activity and physiological responses in DID patients, confirming its biological…
This video explores whether dissociative identity states in DID are authentic or simulated. Evidence shows that these states are genuine, biologically based, and linked to trauma, challenging misconceptions and…
Reinders, A. A., Willemsen, A. T., den Boer, J. A., Vos, H. P., & Nijenhuis, E. R. (2012). Fact or Factitious? A Psychobiological Study of Authentic and Simulated Dissociative Identity* States. PLoS One, 7(6), e39279.
Reinders, A. A. T., Willemsen, A. T. M., Vos, H. P., den Boer, J. A., & Nijenhuis, E. R. S. (2012). Fact or Factitious? A Psychobiological Study of Authentic and Simulated Dissociative Identity States. PLoS One, 7(6), e39279.
@TheSystemSystem We could litterally prove this by using a Siemens/CTI ECAT HR+ pet scan to see which of the supposed fakers is experiencing trauma induced cerebral blood flow changes. https://t.co/Dvq3iqJLAR Know anyone that has one? Making one seems hard.
@soninoooo aucun lien tkt
@WhiteNervosa It would help for Destiny to like, look up anything about this rather than just appeal to his intuition of disgust: https://t.co/jzQ9aIWAR1
https://t.co/jzQ9aIWAR1
I understand your reservations and I'm not asking you to believe my account but I'd appreciate it if after you read further you considered a more empathetic approach towards people affected by DID. Whether or not you believe in it's existence or validity. https://t.co/oALjIU092w
Persevere! 6th attempt (first whole brain study to show cortical and subcortical structural aberrations in DID): https://t.co/Q8dpvIAReH 4th attempt (first study to dismiss the Fantasy model for DID on the basis of neurobiological data): https://t.co/WnhmYHxxzL https://t.co/rcw3aQY71a
RT @AATSReinders: @FndPortal 1) See paper from Vissia et al. 2016 that tests the Trauma and Fantasy model for DID - download here: https://…
@FndPortal 1) See paper from Vissia et al. 2016 that tests the Trauma and Fantasy model for DID - download here: https://t.co/IaoukTWWe2 and https://t.co/JUIZ555YoG 2) Identity-state dependent blood flow patterns are not related to fantasy proneness: https://t.co/WnhmYHxxzL
@CABeck1961 @sammy_lianne (Sorry 4 the notification spam!) PS. In this 2012 study deliberate alter switching in people with DID was compared to high and low fantasy prone actors. Only the genuine DID patients showed the typical brain and circulatory system psychobiological changes. https://t.co/ibNEHbDcnF
by The Three Trauma Amigos. They claim Reinders studies provide "scientific evidence" that DID "is real". Here's one: https://t.co/CZpoSS3Zhy