No… studies show no long term differences in children’s emotional or behavioural programs, sleep, stress, parent-child relationship outcomes or attachment https://t.co/Xtx4Ec8k9G
Five-year follow-up of harms and benefits of behavioral infant sleep intervention: randomized trial.
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
Dec 2019 – Sep 2025Where it's discussed
-
News123 articles
-
Facebook27 posts
-
X / Twitter19 posts
-
Blogs10 articles
-
YouTube3 videos
AI synopsis
What people are saying
The group broadly agrees with the study's conclusion that behavioral sleep interventions don't cause harm, as seen in posts calling it reassuring and citing scientific studies. The tone ranges from supportive to cautiously optimistic, with references to other research and mentions of how the findings might influence parenting practices.
Most discussions support the article, highlighting that behavioral sleep interventions are safe long-term.
Posts demonstrate high interest, with users referencing specific studies and discussing implications.
Comments include references to other research, opinions on methods, and reactions to the findings, showing moderate engagement.
The discussions indicate that the article influences opinions on infant sleep practices, but the overall impact is moderate as some remain skeptical.
Abstract in brief
- This 5-year follow-up study found that behavioral infant sleep interventions do not cause long-term harm or offer significant long-term benefits in children's emotional development, mental health, or parent-child relationships.
- The study involved 326 children and their families, with 225 families (69%) participating in the final follow-up; it compared an intervention group receiving sleep techniques with a control group receiving usual care.
- Overall, the results suggest that behavioral sleep techniques are safe for children and their parents, as there were no significant differences in emotional health, sleep problems, or parenting styles between the groups after five years.]
Top posts
Most liked on X and Blueskyネントレの長期的な影響についての研究結果。 対象:睡眠問題を抱えている生後7ヶ月の326人 期間:5年間の追跡調査 https://t.co/oe6hEeFpP8
(参考文献) https://t.co/oe6hEeomN8 https://t.co/rY8MJqyLoH
@TomWright165389 @allthelambdas Here's a good study: https://t.co/b6pVWqoI4i
@poketrainer_mad @Birchinia @_ytrio_ @unasetata https://t.co/TA4ruQPM64
Five-Year Follow-up of Harms and Benefits of Behavioral Infant Sleep Intervention: Randomized Trial ↑という2012年のオーストラリアの論文が「ねんトレには悪影響がない」の根拠と思っていいのかな…? 私のスキルでは調査方法と結果しか読めなかった
All mentions
Long-term Effects of Behavioral Infant Sleep Interventions Study
This 5-year follow-up study found that behavioral infant sleep interventions do not cause long-term harm or offer significant long-term benefits in children's emotional development, mental health, or parent-child…
Promoting Sleep in Crying Infants: The Transport Response Effectiveness
About 20-30% of infants cry excessively and face sleep issues, causing stress for parents. This study reveals that carrying infants for five minutes can effectively promote sleep, particularly for those who are crying…
Long-term effects of behavioral infant sleep interventions study
This 5-year follow-up study found that behavioral infant sleep interventions do not cause long-term harm or offer significant long-term benefits in children's emotional development, mental health, or parent-child…
Some other studies that have looked at long-term effects of sleep interventions and had similar results: https://t.co/2iJyVyM72I https://t.co/8n16DGycNi
@TomWright165389 @allthelambdas Here's a good study: https://t.co/b6pVWqoI4i
@LeahLibresco My favorite part of the sleep training/cosleeping brouhaha is that there was a small study showing there is NO DIFFERENCE in outcomes between the two parties. https://t.co/qPQoZx2fEh
@adhdbarbie421 @katesadilla21 @ThymeToBeBorn Here’s an actual scientific longitudinal study saying that sleep training has no long term effects on the baby. https://t.co/k0PBN9bMXc
(参考文献) https://t.co/oe6hEeomN8 https://t.co/rY8MJqyLoH
No… studies show no long term differences in children’s emotional or behavioural programs, sleep, stress, parent-child relationship outcomes or attachment https://t.co/Xtx4Ec8k9G
@normalishvegan @tatertotsmcgee @JustAFamilyMan_ I think since they explicitly say they aren’t using cry it out we should believe them. But I can’t actually find any studies that demonstrate damage from sleep training (or not training) - https://t.co/4fg7nDqOwz
@poketrainer_mad @Birchinia @_ytrio_ @unasetata https://t.co/TA4ruQPM64
@blu_mandarine @unasetata @btuister https://t.co/TA4ruQPegw
@anadelliafonte @Kokreta1 Y mientras me meten en la cárcel y eso (porque torturar bebes no merece menos), puedes leer algo para no aburrirte mucho. https://t.co/TA4ruQPM64
@sure_lookit @smol_eefa https://t.co/e7jhgQFO7k
Five-Year Follow-up of Harms and Benefits of Behavioral Infant Sleep Intervention: Randomized Trial ↑という2012年のオーストラリアの論文が「ねんトレには悪影響がない」の根拠と思っていいのかな…? 私のスキルでは調査方法と結果しか読めなかった
@3V0zCHzxrGAHvpX https://t.co/oe6hEeFpP8 https://t.co/sWYImXju1F
RT @nentorefumimama: ネントレの長期的な影響についての研究結果。 対象:睡眠問題を抱えている生後7ヶ月の326人 期間:5年間の追跡調査 https://t.co/oe6hEeFpP8
RT @nentorefumimama: ネントレの長期的な影響についての研究結果。 対象:睡眠問題を抱えている生後7ヶ月の326人 期間:5年間の追跡調査 https://t.co/oe6hEeFpP8
ネントレの長期的な影響についての研究結果。 対象:睡眠問題を抱えている生後7ヶ月の326人 期間:5年間の追跡調査 https://t.co/oe6hEeFpP8
@KittyBeeJr Is sleep training harmful for your baby? No. Read, for instance: https://t.co/OSxFEzsD1p https://t.co/JA9a0gTozi https://t.co/i1pPCHWwhl https://t.co/KgNyJEpEwh 2/n
@SonjaCowling The evidence is actually pretty reassuring: https://t.co/Xtx4Ec7Mk8
Five-Year Follow-up of Harms and Benefits of Behavioral Infant Sleep Intervention: Randomized Trial https://t.co/K4H63ABV0b