@scaleyback246 @HenriqueAbran14 @NotEvolution1 https://t.co/vwf2gHCHmG Heres the pubmed
Molecular analyses of dinosaur osteocytes support the presence of endogenous molecules.
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
Sep 2015 – Nov 2025Where it's discussed
-
News21 articles
-
Facebook17 posts
-
Blogs10 articles
-
X / Twitter9 posts
-
YouTube2 videos
-
Reddit2 posts
AI synopsis
What people are saying
The discussions demonstrate a strong interest, with users referencing studies like Schweitzer's 2007 work on tissue preservation, and debating evidence for endogenous molecules, which indicates both curiosity and critical evaluation. The tone varies from supportive to skeptical, emphasizing the relevance of molecular preservation for ancient DNA research, highlighting both scientific excitement and controversy.
Most discussions support the idea that ancient molecules might be preserved in fossils, aligning with the original publication.
Participants show high interest, referencing multiple studies, debates over DNA preservation, and emotional responses like fascination.
Some posts critically analyze the findings and reference historical research, indicating active engagement with the topic.
The discussions reflect recognition of the potential significance for understanding dinosaur biology and molecular preservation, though some remain skeptical.
Abstract in brief
- The study investigates dinosaur bone microstructures called osteocytes and uses advanced techniques like immunology and mass spectrometry to find evidence that these structures still contain original proteins such as actin, tubulin, PHEX, and histone H4, as well as DNA, suggesting these molecules have been preserved over millions of years.
- The researchers used antibodies and DNA stains that reacted with the dinosaur cells in ways similar to modern osteocytes, providing strong evidence that these microstructures are indeed remnants of original biological material rather than contaminants or artifacts.
- The findings imply that some cellular components of dinosaurs, including proteins and DNA, can be preserved long after the animal's death, offering new insights into dinosaur biology and molecular preservation through time.
Top posts
Most liked on X and Bluesky@DanesiJean A part cette publication et celle de Schweitzer et al., 2012 "Molecular analyses of dinosaur osteocytes support the presence of endogenous molecules" il me ne semble pas que l'on ait de meilleurs indications d'une conservation partielle/possible d'ADN Mésozoïque de dinosaure
Matt Powell Takes Four Atheists at Once! https://t.co/8E4fjPw3GR via @YouTube
Matt Powell Takes Four Atheists at Once! https://t.co/xxLK2IpnUC via @YouTube
@DvdButler @pgarrett25 @DarwinianAscent @AiG This one? Not seeing anything you’re referring to. Biofilm is rejected. Schweitzer, M. H., Zheng, W., Cleland, T. P., & Bern, M. (2011). Molecular analyses of dinosaur osteocytes support the presence of endogenous molecules. Bone, 52(1), 414-423.
@SarzeLight @creationnews Somewhat. Yes, no full DNA. "Soft-Tissue Vessels and Cellular Preservation in Tyrannosaurus rex" 2007, in Proceedings of the Royal Society by Mary Schweitzer Schweitzer, M. H. et al. 2013, Molecular analyses of dinosaur osteocytes support the presence of endogenous molecules.
All mentions
Molecular Evidence of Preserved Dinosaur Cell Structures and DNA
This episode discusses the special iDino edition of the Creation Research Society Quarterly, addressing dinosaur microstructures and evidence of preserved proteins and DNA in fossils, challenging conventional notions of…
Iron and Oxygen Chemistry in Dinosaur Soft Tissue Preservation
This video explores how iron particles, especially goethite, and oxygen interactions play a crucial role in preserving soft tissues in dinosaur fossils, revealing insights into molecular preservation over millions of…
@scaleyback246 @HenriqueAbran14 @NotEvolution1 https://t.co/vwf2gHCHmG Heres the pubmed
@SarzeLight @creationnews Somewhat. Yes, no full DNA. "Soft-Tissue Vessels and Cellular Preservation in Tyrannosaurus rex" 2007, in Proceedings of the Royal Society by Mary Schweitzer Schweitzer, M. H. et al. 2013, Molecular analyses of dinosaur osteocytes support the presence of endogenous molecules.
@DvdButler @pgarrett25 @DarwinianAscent @AiG This one? Not seeing anything you’re referring to. Biofilm is rejected. Schweitzer, M. H., Zheng, W., Cleland, T. P., & Bern, M. (2011). Molecular analyses of dinosaur osteocytes support the presence of endogenous molecules. Bone, 52(1), 414-423.
@panncakemouse @DevAndyZ @billmaher I just linked an article stating otherwise. But here’s another! https://t.co/EuQGqIpbv3
@RegTheDude @lizard_ledgend @mike54191 @ArkEncounter https://t.co/ysjtyW2XzX
@RegTheDude @Christi01580349 @AbnormalWrench @Enobesra88 @hairybadgerIDFK @TakeThatDarwin @mrfunnysmart @chuerta1 @BloodRedEye1 @jojoemello @Melanie33720945 @BillyPhysics @PBDerbysAtheist @Barney02073101 @DavidWRSB @WarrenSm2 @maserchief123 @AiG Actually it seems they do have dinosaur DNA. Schweitzer, M.H. et al. Molecular analyses of dinosaur osteocytes support the presence of endogenous molecules, Bone, 17 Oct 2012 | doi:10.1016/j.bone.2012.10.010.
Matt Powell Takes Four Atheists at Once! https://t.co/8E4fjPw3GR via @YouTube
Matt Powell Takes Four Atheists at Once! https://t.co/xxLK2IpnUC via @YouTube
@DanesiJean A part cette publication et celle de Schweitzer et al., 2012 "Molecular analyses of dinosaur osteocytes support the presence of endogenous molecules" il me ne semble pas que l'on ait de meilleurs indications d'une conservation partielle/possible d'ADN Mésozoïque de dinosaure
K
RF
R
NE
TV
IA
TC