The discussions are marked by curiosity and technical analysis, with posters referencing figures like the comparative environmental impacts of diets (e.g., 'all those in this study below that, even the American one') and methodological concerns about how impacts are measured. The tone balances respect for the research with questions about its regional applicability, demonstrating moderate engagement and interest without outright agreement or dismissiveness.
AgreementNeither agree nor disagree
The discussions do not strongly agree or disagree with the publication, reflecting a neutral stance or curiosity rather than outright support or opposition.
InterestHigh interest
Many posts show high interest by referencing specific data, asking questions, or sharing links to related research.
EngagementModerate engagement
Posts demonstrate active engagement through detailed comments, comparisons, and discussions about methodologies, indicating a moderate level of involvement.
ImpactModerate impact
The discussions acknowledge the importance of environmental dietary research, but there's no clear consensus on its immediate influence or practical implications.
Abstract in brief
The study examines how different dietary choices in Germany in 2006 affect the environment, highlighting that shifts towards vegan or ovolacto vegetarian diets could significantly reduce environmental impacts.
It compares current diets with those from 20 years earlier, showing overall improvements in environmental indicators, mainly due to healthier eating habits rather than reductions in food waste.
Gender differences are noted, with women’s diets being closer to recommended levels and impacts generally lower for females than males.]
@StephanPetersNL @EATforum @drdairy50 @FoodNavigator @foodlog_nl @paolodecastro @eDairyNews @dairyreporter @EDA_Dairy Thanks for sharing, Stephan. Haven't read it yet but, usually, omnivore dietary footprints are estimated at around 5 kg/p/d. Why are all the ones in this study below that, even the American one?
See e.g.:
-https://t.co/VbphbIBybd
-https://t.co/HKvMR0b0MH
-https://t.co/KIIYTiTlsR
May 11, 2022 · 4 likes · 1 share · 29,139 followersView post →
FL
Frédéric Leroy
@fleroy1974 · X
@Fewiker @BioMickWatson Some LCAs do, others don't. Largely region dependent. For Germany, not a game changer: https://t.co/HKvMR0b0MH Plus, none take into account true warming potential of CH4 (GWP*) or true nutritional value of the diet. Things need to be said about sequestration potential too. https://t.co/RTocqXdGWN
@kevinnbass The study by Meier and Christen can be read here (in the graph, the two categories on the left and one on the right explain the variability from 2 to 4.7 depending on the type of diet and the gases taken into account): https://t.co/UIlDrKLdEk
@vanesavallejo3 @AgustinLaje @GretaThunberg El estudio de Meier y Christen pueden leerlo acá (en el gráfico, las dos categorías de la izquierda y una de la derecha explican la variabilidad de 2 a 4,7 según el tipo de dieta y los gases tenidos en cuenta): https://t.co/UIlDrKLdEk
Weidefleisch ist ökologischer und tötet weniger Tiere als pflanzliche Nahrungsmittel. This video delves into sustainable practices and policies that maintain ecological balance and promote social equity, ensuring a safe…
Many agricultural areas are unsuitable for food crops and can only be used for animal feed. This video explores the implications of land usage in light of sustainability and environmental balance, emphasizing the need…
If everyone adopted a vegan diet, we would face significant challenges in plant production due to space limitations. This video delves into how critical Earth system processes like biodiversity loss and climate change…
@StephanPetersNL @EATforum @drdairy50 @FoodNavigator @foodlog_nl @paolodecastro @eDairyNews @dairyreporter @EDA_Dairy Thanks for sharing, Stephan. Haven't read it yet but, usually, omnivore dietary footprints are estimated at around 5 kg/p/d. Why are all the ones in this study below that, even the American one?
See e.g.:
-https://t.co/VbphbIBybd
-https://t.co/HKvMR0b0MH
-https://t.co/KIIYTiTlsR
May 11, 2022 · 4 likes · 1 share · 29,139 followersView post →
FL
Frédéric Leroy
@fleroy1974 · X
@Fewiker @BioMickWatson Some LCAs do, others don't. Largely region dependent. For Germany, not a game changer: https://t.co/HKvMR0b0MH Plus, none take into account true warming potential of CH4 (GWP*) or true nutritional value of the diet. Things need to be said about sequestration potential too. https://t.co/RTocqXdGWN
@kevinnbass The study by Meier and Christen can be read here (in the graph, the two categories on the left and one on the right explain the variability from 2 to 4.7 depending on the type of diet and the gases taken into account): https://t.co/UIlDrKLdEk
@vanesavallejo3 @AgustinLaje @GretaThunberg El estudio de Meier y Christen pueden leerlo acá (en el gráfico, las dos categorías de la izquierda y una de la derecha explican la variabilidad de 2 a 4,7 según el tipo de dieta y los gases tenidos en cuenta): https://t.co/UIlDrKLdEk
