April 2013 PMID 23382020

Why coelacanths are not 'living fossils': a review of molecular and morphological data.

Didier Casane, Patrick Laurenti

Download social card

Mentions

139
Peak: 39 in Jan 2023
across 6 sources since Feb 2013

Extended reach

3,514,978
potential audience

Total likes

85,263

Video views

3,343,875

Mentions per month

Feb 2013 – Sep 2025

Where it's discussed

  • X / Twitter110 posts
  • YouTube11 videos
  • News6 articles
  • Blogs6 articles
  • Facebook5 posts
  • Bluesky1 posts

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The discussions demonstrate a strong collective interest in clarifying misconceptions about coelacanths, with frequent references to scientific data and critiques of simplistic labels like 'living fossils.' Words like 'misleading,' 'support,' and 'evolutionary' signal a respectful yet critical tone that emphasizes scientific accuracy and deeper engagement with the topic.

AgreementModerate agreement

Most posters acknowledge that coelacanths are not 'living fossils' and support the article's conclusions, though some express nuanced views.

InterestHigh interest

Discussions show high interest with multiple mentions of the article, related data, and evolutionary concepts, indicating curiosity and engagement.

EngagementModerate engagement

Posts often reference specific research, challenge misconceptions, or share videos explaining the topic, reflecting meaningful engagement.

ImpactModerate impact

The discussion highlights a shift towards clarifying misconceptions about evolution and fossil classification, which could influence public understanding and scientific communication.

Abstract in brief

  • Recent studies on coelacanths show that their slow evolution in both molecular and morphological aspects does not mean they are "living fossils," as previously thought.
  • The assumption that low genetic variation indicates a low mutation rate is flawed, and studies showing higher mutation rates are often ignored.
  • Morphological stability in coelacanths is not strongly supported by fossil evidence, and the idea of them being primitive or unchanged from ancient times is questioned from an evolutionary perspective.]

Top posts

Most liked on X and Bluesky
Yuki Kimura
@ykimura_bio · X

「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/OBhDZOg4TQ

Jan 6, 2023 · 178 likes · 43 shares · 402 followers View post →
Eldar Asanov
@EldarEnverovich · X

4. жиҳатдан ўзгариб борганини исботлаган. Пруф: https://t.co/BQQgJpevEk Келинг, тушунмаган нарсамизга аралашмаймиз, аралашгимиз келса, ҳақиқий тадқиқотларни ўқиймиз, шарлатанларга эмас, олимларга ишонамиз.

Jul 22, 2023 · 27 likes · 3,083 followers View post →
Stated Clearly - Jon Perry
@StatedClearly · X

In the new Stated Casually video (my weekend project) I used fitness landscapes to show how it is that organisms can get evolutionarily "stuck". It was super fun to make! https://t.co/YtjjQsGh2b https://t.co/4AaA9zZ6G7

Mar 16, 2021 · 18 likes · 3 shares · 4,595 followers View post →
カイセキリュウ
@kaisekiriu · X

そもそも「シーラカンス類の"進化速度"は遅い」は本当なのかという問題があるのを思い出した。 https://t.co/LHRbJJ7q4o

Jul 15, 2023 · 15 likes · 2 shares · 428 followers View post →
Taupo
@pierrekerner · X

[FLASHBACK SSAFT] Mise à jour bienvenue du billet de @p_laurenti sur l'inanité de considérer le coelacanthe comme un fossile vivant, hébergé sur #SSAFT https://t.co/ByhEqfHRaM et qui a mené à une véritable publication scientifique dans la foulée : https://t.co/2rdVYRiNVf https://t.co/j3JIQ1TCY9

Apr 30, 2020 · 5 likes · 6 shares · 10,119 followers View post →
John Smith⚛ (Explorer of Reality)
@doofgeek4011 · X

Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ A review of molecular and morphological data @JacksonWheat1 @StevenDJBaumann https://t.co/cdpDJV2DZC https://t.co/OZwD8TSYBj https://t.co/qTEN7DZ9Ue https://t.co/94ecW4QP8K https://t.co/1WCsbaGViQ https://t.co/vKOOzT3Omc

Oct 5, 2020 · 5 likes · 4,072 followers View post →

All mentions

Christopher Chambers (He/Him/His)
@cpchambe · X

@NotEvolution1 The first fish to walk out of water is thought to be a SPINED/chordate fish of the Dipnoi class. Their lineage split from other sarcopterygians like coelacanths ~416MYr ago. Coelacanths are not “living fossils” as in “unevolved” the show expected mutations https://t.co/DY4LF6jLNT https://t.co/jwtFkzyOmV

Aug 9, 2025 · 65 followers View post →
ACM
@CorralesAdi · X

@Ralph_9000 @AteosSF No comprendo muy bien que tienen que ver las gallinas con los dinosaurios, pero el artículo ql que te refiero no menciona ni una sola gallina. ¿Comprendiste lo que se explica ahí sobre el "drift" genético? Te lo pongo de nuevo por si perdiste el link. https://t.co/viF568CDN3

May 29, 2025 · 1 like · 101 followers View post →
ACM
@CorralesAdi · X

@Ralph_9000 @AteosSF No soy experto en biología, pero siéntete en libertad de desmentir este artículo punto por punto: https://t.co/viF568CDN3

May 29, 2025 · 1 like · 101 followers View post →
Natã Cavalcanti
@NatCavalcanti4 · X

https://t.co/TyTygji6g3

Dec 29, 2024 · 25 followers View post →
Lv
@LVampre84526 · X

https://t.co/L1EJnMtP6a

Dec 13, 2024 · 19 followers View post →
Hiei_stan
@Hiei_stan · X

RT @MinutoDaTerra: Corre lá pro YouTube e conheça as espécies que quebraram a teoria da evolução! https://t.co/3bxnrHEAHf

Dec 13, 2024 · 1 share · 281 followers View post →
Minuto da Terra
@MinutoDaTerra · X

Corre lá pro YouTube e conheça as espécies que quebraram a teoria da evolução! https://t.co/3bxnrHEAHf

Dec 13, 2024 · 1 like · 1 share · 2,971 followers View post →
Danilo Pianini
@DanySK86 · X

https://t.co/yGH0C3eIEo

Sep 26, 2024 · 2 likes · 302 followers View post →
˚✧₊⁎
@AgrumeSpigliato · X

29. https://t.co/KE2thccXhN

Sep 26, 2024 · 15 followers View post →
Indonesian Society for Evolutionary Studies
@evoina_org · X

Casane, D., & Laurenti, P. (2013). Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ A review of molecular and morphological data. Bioessays, 35(4), 332-338.

Aug 9, 2024 · 2 likes · 919 followers View post →
モグィ
@mobile04 · X

RT @Visceral9000: @kplme5 Plus the term living fossil is still very misleading. Which is why many scientific educators and academics advise…

Jul 19, 2024 · 1 share · 336 followers View post →
Visceral9000
@Visceral9000 · X

@kplme5 Plus the term living fossil is still very misleading. Which is why many scientific educators and academics advise not to used it. Here is a video about it! https://t.co/Aov8kbE5zF

Jul 18, 2024 · 4 likes · 1 share · 3,246 followers View post →
Russ Epp-Leppel
@leppeppel · X

Have I mentioned recently that fish don't exist? Maybe keep this in mind for a week or so.

May 22, 2024 · 175 followers View post →
Mario Coiro, @Lepidodendron@ecoevo.social
@Lepidodendron · X

RT @JacksonWheat1: @Lepidodendron I did a video recently on the problems with “living fossils”: https://t.co/cc2898q13O

Mar 22, 2024 · 1 share · 1,858 followers View post →
Jackson Wheat
@JacksonWheat1 · X

@Lepidodendron I did a video recently on the problems with “living fossils”: https://t.co/cc2898q13O

Mar 22, 2024 · 2 likes · 1 share · 2,837 followers View post →
Russ Epp-Leppel
@leppeppel · X

@Helgoose_Comix Fun Fact: mudbug is a more taxonomically appropriate name than shellfish. (As arthropods, they're more closely related to bugs than fish.) https://t.co/Njxc53Xmrp

Mar 12, 2024 · 1 like · 175 followers View post →
An Atheist in Boise
@atheistinboise · X

@EMaxwell56 @LolaGoog32641 @NotEvolution1 No, it isn’t evidence for stasis. https://t.co/H3jD9JRKy8 https://t.co/YF7fcNQQxU

Jan 31, 2024 · 86 followers View post →
GonnaGoForIt (GonnaGoForIt.bsky.social)
@YTGGFI · X

RT @JacksonWheat1: https://t.co/NcnQORsiF5

Oct 12, 2023 · 1 share · 1,458 followers View post →
Jackson Wheat
@JacksonWheat1 · X

https://t.co/NcnQORsiF5

Oct 12, 2023 · 1 like · 1 share · 2,837 followers View post →
Dawble
@Bawby345 · X

@MissouriLibert2 @denvertigrz @MrJohns52403217 @Haemish857 @piper4missouri The trilobites we have today are absolutely nothing like the trilobites that are extinct. That's like saying "I was told the dinosaurs went extinct but birds still exist!" I mean, sure, birds are dinosaurs, but the non-avians didn't survive. https://t.co/rX8dAA7wul

Sep 20, 2023 · 49 followers View post →
Arya
@AryaPanam · X

https://t.co/Vs1ahUS9C7

Sep 12, 2023 · 64 followers View post →
LeRaptorSauvage
@RaptorSauvage · X

@AfoutK @TaRkOTheSparrow @kenshiro370 @LeContempIateur Je pense qu'il parle de ce passage mais je laisse les auteurs de cette publication, lui répondre. https://t.co/adev0YucOF https://t.co/LZ9zayjyOP

Aug 29, 2023 · 2 likes · 1,346 followers View post →
LeRaptorSauvage
@RaptorSauvage · X

@kenshiro370 @LeContempIateur Oh qu'es que c'est con ! On a des études qui démontre que Cœlacanthe et sa famille ont subit des évolutions morphologique au cours du temps ! https://t.co/IibyasGcxs https://t.co/KCuYZLzuch

Aug 29, 2023 · 1 like · 1,346 followers View post →
☭️֎ ߷ ۝ @abraxas0anansi.bsky.social ۝ ߷ ֍☭️
@Abraxas0Anansi · X

@Patrick_JOJO @MickaCorreia Bah si, les espèces sont pas fixe dans le temps d'où l'fait que "les fossiles vivants" reste un mythe aux yeux des paléontologues https://t.co/vsntNf5A5J Puis bon, c'est à la porte du fixisme spé génération spontanée ce genre de sorties.

Aug 17, 2023 · 854 followers View post →
Eldar Asanov
@EldarEnverovich · X

https://t.co/BQQgJpevEk https://t.co/TIPUkFf7z7 https://t.co/yO8IOkadCq https://t.co/lS1iu8eeFQ https://t.co/7laATJdV79 Ва ҳ.к.

Jul 23, 2023 · 4 likes · 3,083 followers View post →
Eldar Asanov
@EldarEnverovich · X

4. жиҳатдан ўзгариб борганини исботлаган. Пруф: https://t.co/BQQgJpevEk Келинг, тушунмаган нарсамизга аралашмаймиз, аралашгимиз келса, ҳақиқий тадқиқотларни ўқиймиз, шарлатанларга эмас, олимларга ишонамиз.

Jul 22, 2023 · 27 likes · 3,083 followers View post →
O espécime
@O_Especime · X

@GabriielN_ @FredhRodrigues Tem esses artigos aqui: https://t.co/aSu7AUbrkc https://t.co/hxgCmXglLx https://t.co/RGAg6NAwnB

Jul 20, 2023 · 1 like · 12,414 followers View post →
Dawble
@Bawby345 · X

@cr69to420 @Orland_Sundri @DannyLovesPizza @TakeThatDarwin @iluminatibot https://t.co/AvGo6E0tkP

Jul 18, 2023 · 1 like · 49 followers View post →
Dawble
@Bawby345 · X

@JSongwriter49 @TakeThatDarwin @antallan @SecularOutpost @ProfBrianCox https://t.co/AvGo6E0tkP https://t.co/PkeRoGahHw

Jul 17, 2023 · 49 followers View post →
ガイス
@shitake_reverse · X

RT @kaisekiriu: そもそも「シーラカンス類の"進化速度"は遅い」は本当なのかという問題があるのを思い出した。 https://t.co/LHRbJJ7q4o

Jul 15, 2023 · 2 shares · 3,461 followers View post →
Masa-aki Yoshida
@yoshidamasaaki · X

RT @kaisekiriu: そもそも「シーラカンス類の"進化速度"は遅い」は本当なのかという問題があるのを思い出した。 https://t.co/LHRbJJ7q4o

Jul 15, 2023 · 2 shares · 2,836 followers View post →
カイセキリュウ
@kaisekiriu · X

そもそも「シーラカンス類の"進化速度"は遅い」は本当なのかという問題があるのを思い出した。 https://t.co/LHRbJJ7q4o

Jul 15, 2023 · 15 likes · 2 shares · 428 followers View post →
Julian Norris
@Paleoguy073 · X

@dan_cameron99 @MrJohns52403217 @liberal_jamie @Guy_JustaGuy3 @LannisterLeo @depth_ocean_ @_truthswordsa @umfpt @hubie0 @waiting4evidnce @RebelATliance @girmayyy @mirandaisrisen @BrianNazarenus @megafant1 @ForrestRichardA @ScientiaPercept @1Quetzalcoatl1 @LucZeph @remofjacob_ @daren_wedge @kester_lowers @dirk_fasshauer @DarkCowboyGod @orna_verum @EdgeZeto @DementedHuman @StevenB45193461 @ChrisLeePike @FifthDonkey @CodexMma @MephistoTabern1 @CarusoLawLV @D_D_1983 @rkdoctr @ericlovesvinyl @1pckt @themucusonkel @SecularSmurf @WatkinsFolly @ax2n38 @Chortling_Man @NHoomans @OnlyaMoment3 @DeanoMartino1 @badgervindaloo @Infeterrence @TakeThatDarwin @robburdack @Dwyertd Coelacanths have a very rich fossil history and we’re very morphologically diverse between the Devonian and Carboniferous. https://t.co/WXVIotyym5 https://t.co/6fXCBbLA0I https://t.co/IoYPFMiqzG

Jun 24, 2023 · 2 likes · 373 followers View post →
Tobias Berg
@Mountainhound_z · X

Evolutionen precis som tiden är i konstant förändring, men evolutionen kan gå snabbt eller långsamt dock aldrig stanna, något som tydligt märks kring idén om "levande fossiler" som egentligen bara har hittat en "perfekt form" som inte behövt förbättras https://t.co/XC72zaACLl

Jun 2, 2023 · 1 like · 408 followers View post →
小樋井蓮人
@CoherentTheWave · X

RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…

Jan 9, 2023 · 43 shares · 210 followers View post →
一切唯心造
@mspd15 · X

RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…

Jan 8, 2023 · 43 shares · 100 followers View post →
andthehouserockers
@andthehouserock · X

RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…

Jan 8, 2023 · 43 shares · 195 followers View post →
[のっつー]
@ymcl2J9ZaBdbKUc · X

RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…

Jan 8, 2023 · 43 shares · 84 followers View post →
通りすがり
@bacaryau · X

RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…

Jan 8, 2023 · 43 shares · 478 followers View post →
ギョッツ2号
@katochanpe_2 · X

RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…

Jan 8, 2023 · 43 shares · 1,571 followers View post →
Yoshitugu Tuduki/都築良継
@TSMoon56 · X

RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…

Jan 8, 2023 · 43 shares · 2,928 followers View post →
Otora Chikamiya /近宮緒虎
@CHIKAMIYA_O · X

RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…

Jan 8, 2023 · 43 shares · 69 followers View post →
SatoKazoo
@SatoKazoo · X

RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…

Jan 8, 2023 · 43 shares · 412 followers View post →
どらごん
@tsurigasukiii · X

RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…

Jan 8, 2023 · 43 shares · 197 followers View post →
Yasuyuki Hashiguchi
@hashiyuki0909 · X

RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…

Jan 8, 2023 · 43 shares · 1,277 followers View post →
無面目
@hieda02rou · X

RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…

Jan 8, 2023 · 43 shares · 350 followers View post →
at
@Qat00 · X

RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…

Jan 8, 2023 · 43 shares · 1,041 followers View post →
ぶどう
@b_3oh · X

RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…

Jan 8, 2023 · 43 shares · 240 followers View post →
澪蜻
@Mio_yennba52 · X

RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…

Jan 8, 2023 · 43 shares · 1,171 followers View post →
ビクーピー
@B47197246 · X

RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…

Jan 8, 2023 · 43 shares · 1,896 followers View post →
ROZE
@E9A2A8_E7A59E · X

RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…

Jan 8, 2023 · 43 shares · 195 followers View post →
いわし
@iwashihead · X

RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…

Jan 8, 2023 · 43 shares · 303 followers View post →
hina
@hina_r18 · X

Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/QnV1usJwdJ

Jan 8, 2023 · 1,059 followers View post →
O. obscura
@JapaneseLoach · X

RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…

Jan 8, 2023 · 43 shares · 3,310 followers View post →
Corydoras Sterbai
@syonan113 · X

RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…

Jan 8, 2023 · 43 shares · 1,395 followers View post →
赤塚 勝敏
@akatsukaa · X

Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ A review of molecular and morphological data (First published: 04 February 2013) https://t.co/NT0DyurQ7q Figure 1でCoelacanthusとあるのは… https://t.co/cm3SBTEH1o

Jan 7, 2023 · 283 followers View post →
ニャーガ@メイドインカツシカ
@siroyagi · X

RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…

Jan 7, 2023 · 43 shares · 978 followers View post →
kerokero36
@kerokero36 · X

RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…

Jan 7, 2023 · 43 shares · 951 followers View post →
s6m3s3n4?
@s6m3s3n4 · X

RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…

Jan 7, 2023 · 43 shares · 498 followers View post →
みたむむ@士業の資格取ります。
@Life_Gackt · X

RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…

Jan 7, 2023 · 43 shares · 302 followers View post →
青柳
@FBWM8888 · X

RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…

Jan 7, 2023 · 43 shares · 727 followers View post →
ろぼ 水戸@喪中
@ROBOmito · X

RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…

Jan 7, 2023 · 43 shares · 5,441 followers View post →
ルース
@ruth_mst · X

RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…

Jan 7, 2023 · 43 shares · 1,052 followers View post →
9さん(
@930_jp · X

RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…

Jan 7, 2023 · 43 shares · 962 followers View post →
とよけらとぷす
@rex_toyo · X

RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…

Jan 7, 2023 · 43 shares · 2,150 followers View post →
トドのごんた
@todonotumari_2 · X

RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…

Jan 7, 2023 · 43 shares · 52 followers View post →
Такаакі Іто
@lap51361412 · X

RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…

Jan 7, 2023 · 43 shares · 48 followers View post →
RURI
@RURI19406671 · X

RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…

Jan 7, 2023 · 43 shares · 265 followers View post →
Chauliodus
@ophiacodon · X

RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…

Jan 7, 2023 · 43 shares · 612 followers View post →
グリボ
@Gribeauval1942 · X

RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…

Jan 7, 2023 · 43 shares · 1,023 followers View post →
カイセキリュウ
@kaisekiriu · X

RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…

Jan 7, 2023 · 43 shares · 428 followers View post →
Yuki Kimura
@ykimura_bio · X

「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/OBhDZOg4TQ

Jan 6, 2023 · 178 likes · 43 shares · 402 followers View post →
Julian Norris
@Paleoguy073 · X

@Obadiah_3 @ICRscience Coelacanths never went extinct as lungfish and both actually went on their own evolutionary radiations separate from tetrapods. https://t.co/6fXCBbM7Qg That being said they’re still love-finned fish and are genetically closer to us than to other fishes. https://t.co/Eav2w2Xqog

Jan 6, 2023 · 1 like · 373 followers View post →
Taupo
@pierrekerner · X

@ImaneRod Les biologistes évitent de plus en plus l'expression "fossile vivant". Un billet de @p_laurenti sur mon blog pour expliquer cela https://t.co/8uGceqhlfl (et une revue en anglais) https://t.co/2rdVYRiNVf

Jan 11, 2022 · 2 likes · 10,119 followers View post →
Patrick Laurenti
@p_laurenti · X

RT @pierrekerner: @astropierre @M_Lablouse Pour des avis moins tranchés que le mien et celui de @p_laurenti sur la question : @PaleonewsFr…

Aug 22, 2021 · 1 share · 1,314 followers View post →
Taupo
@pierrekerner · X

@astropierre @M_Lablouse Pour des avis moins tranchés que le mien et celui de @p_laurenti sur la question : @PaleonewsFrance https://t.co/OjsoSpqGBk et @StatedClearly https://t.co/i0zhSwfRkF

Aug 22, 2021 · 3 likes · 1 share · 10,063 followers View post →
Light-Yagami
@LightYa33625392 · X

Did the Coelacanth stop evolving? Evolution Questions #22 https://t.co/BIxoxdqGN3 via @YouTube

Jun 4, 2021 · 1 like · 23 followers View post →
Bilbo the Unbeliever
@BilboUnbeliever · X

@EKorteweg @054durin @Yahoo See e.g. https://t.co/O6bFOr5fPP

May 20, 2021 · 1 like · 83 followers View post →
Bilbo the Unbeliever
@BilboUnbeliever · X

@duncstorey @MarvinDigeorgio @leo_behe @BittyBuddha @Shann_Q0 If you're genuinely curious read: https://t.co/O6bFOr5fPP What changes would you expect to have occurred?

May 16, 2021 · 83 followers View post →
Bilbo the Unbeliever
@BilboUnbeliever · X

@duncstorey @MarvinDigeorgio @leo_behe @BittyBuddha @Shann_Q0 See e.g. https://t.co/O6bFOr5fPP

May 16, 2021 · 83 followers View post →
Stacy Farina
@stacyfarina · X

@Orang_Hutan_ @WilliamFouts Here are some papers: https://t.co/20ElpDKDc3. https://t.co/sweRA7ZOZX

May 8, 2021 · 3,850 followers View post →
Russ Epp-Leppel
@leppeppel · X

#FunFact: Bony fish such as salmon are more closely related to dolphins than they are to cartilaginous fish like sharks. #Biology https://t.co/V7kjUXTLCD

Apr 7, 2021 · 175 followers View post →
Felipe Alonso
@FelipeAlonsoBio · X

RT @StatedClearly: In the new Stated Casually video (my weekend project) I used fitness landscapes to show how it is that organisms can get…

Mar 17, 2021 · 3 shares · 1,328 followers View post →
Jorro Le
@ballsimpsons · X

RT @StatedClearly: In the new Stated Casually video (my weekend project) I used fitness landscapes to show how it is that organisms can get…

Mar 17, 2021 · 3 shares · 522 followers View post →
John P. Friel, Ph.D.
@friel · X

RT @StatedClearly: In the new Stated Casually video (my weekend project) I used fitness landscapes to show how it is that organisms can get…

Mar 16, 2021 · 3 shares · 7,662 followers View post →
Stated Clearly - Jon Perry
@StatedClearly · X

In the new Stated Casually video (my weekend project) I used fitness landscapes to show how it is that organisms can get evolutionarily "stuck". It was super fun to make! https://t.co/YtjjQsGh2b https://t.co/4AaA9zZ6G7

Mar 16, 2021 · 18 likes · 3 shares · 4,595 followers View post →
Jorro Le
@ballsimpsons · X

RT @StatedClearly: Nothing like a coelacanth evolution murder mystery on a Monday afternoon: https://t.co/YtjjQsGh2b

Mar 15, 2021 · 3 shares · 522 followers View post →
Milton Tan
@mtanichthys · X

RT @StatedClearly: Nothing like a coelacanth evolution murder mystery on a Monday afternoon: https://t.co/YtjjQsGh2b

Mar 15, 2021 · 3 shares · 5,096 followers View post →
John P. Friel, Ph.D.
@friel · X

RT @StatedClearly: Nothing like a coelacanth evolution murder mystery on a Monday afternoon: https://t.co/YtjjQsGh2b

Mar 15, 2021 · 3 shares · 7,662 followers View post →
Stated Clearly - Jon Perry
@StatedClearly · X

Nothing like a coelacanth evolution murder mystery on a Monday afternoon: https://t.co/YtjjQsGh2b

Mar 15, 2021 · 3 likes · 3 shares · 4,595 followers View post →
Crap Zap (Sabrina)
@CrapZap · X

Liked on YouTube: Living Fossils, Evolution, and Cryptids https://t.co/pdGqViOKq8

Feb 14, 2021 · 290 followers View post →
J.B.
@DenebolaZenFoto · X

Watch "Living Fossils, Evolution, and Cryptids" on YouTube https://t.co/kCuUkDOEpS

Jan 15, 2021 · 646 followers View post →
ThrowRENTintotheDUSTBINofHISTORY-See MY Policy
@SecularGovt · X

Living Fossils, Evolution, and Cryptids https://t.co/gD0QcpL3OC via @YouTube

Jan 10, 2021 · 1,370 followers View post →
Aristocrat of Greed
@rational_egoist · X

https://t.co/JcsQ6cQ3ia

Dec 27, 2020 · 182 followers View post →
Milton Tan
@mtanichthys · X

RT @BrianSidlauskas: @DrCraigMc @SolomonRDavid @PREAUX_FISH @fishvecchio The body shape diversity of extinct coelacanths far exceeds that o…

Dec 18, 2020 · 1 share · 5,090 followers View post →
Brian Sidlauskas
@BrianSidlauskas · X

@DrCraigMc @SolomonRDavid @PREAUX_FISH @fishvecchio The body shape diversity of extinct coelacanths far exceeds that of the two living species. See article here by Casane and Laurenti. https://t.co/ieOzaPBpGe

Dec 18, 2020 · 2 likes · 1 share · 1,861 followers View post →
Astraea_Styx
@Astraea_Styx · X

Living Fossils, Evolution, and Cryptids - YouTube https://t.co/Y094J1nddM

Oct 22, 2020 · 1,454 followers View post →
John Smith⚛ (Explorer of Reality)
@doofgeek4011 · X

Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ A review of molecular and morphological data @JacksonWheat1 @StevenDJBaumann https://t.co/cdpDJV2DZC https://t.co/OZwD8TSYBj https://t.co/qTEN7DZ9Ue https://t.co/94ecW4QP8K https://t.co/1WCsbaGViQ https://t.co/vKOOzT3Omc

Oct 5, 2020 · 5 likes · 4,072 followers View post →
Jordini AKA Goblin
@jordinizuccini · X

I love Trey the Explainer, but the creationists in the beginning BROKE MY BRAIN. STOP GUYS. https://t.co/5a0vcSmVuM

Jun 29, 2020 · 40 followers View post →
Espace & Milieux
@EspaceMilieux · X

RT @pierrekerner: [FLASHBACK SSAFT] Mise à jour bienvenue du billet de @p_laurenti sur l'inanité de considérer le coelacanthe comme un foss…

May 5, 2020 · 6 shares · 35 followers View post →
LIED
@LIED_UP7 · X

RT @pierrekerner: [FLASHBACK SSAFT] Mise à jour bienvenue du billet de @p_laurenti sur l'inanité de considérer le coelacanthe comme un foss…

May 5, 2020 · 6 shares · 68 followers View post →
Stranger Species
@SpeciesStranger · X

RT @pierrekerner: [FLASHBACK SSAFT] Mise à jour bienvenue du billet de @p_laurenti sur l'inanité de considérer le coelacanthe comme un foss…

May 4, 2020 · 6 shares · 66 followers View post →
Patrick Laurenti
@p_laurenti · X

RT @pierrekerner: [FLASHBACK SSAFT] Mise à jour bienvenue du billet de @p_laurenti sur l'inanité de considérer le coelacanthe comme un foss…

Apr 30, 2020 · 6 shares · 1,325 followers View post →
Les Chercheurs Font Leur Cinéma Masqués
@FestivalLCFLC · X

RT @pierrekerner: [FLASHBACK SSAFT] Mise à jour bienvenue du billet de @p_laurenti sur l'inanité de considérer le coelacanthe comme un foss…

Apr 30, 2020 · 6 shares · 104 followers View post →
Bruno Serranito
@SerranitoBruno · X

RT @pierrekerner: [FLASHBACK SSAFT] Mise à jour bienvenue du billet de @p_laurenti sur l'inanité de considérer le coelacanthe comme un foss…

Apr 30, 2020 · 6 shares · 40 followers View post →
Taupo
@pierrekerner · X

[FLASHBACK SSAFT] Mise à jour bienvenue du billet de @p_laurenti sur l'inanité de considérer le coelacanthe comme un fossile vivant, hébergé sur #SSAFT https://t.co/ByhEqfHRaM et qui a mené à une véritable publication scientifique dans la foulée : https://t.co/2rdVYRiNVf https://t.co/j3JIQ1TCY9

Apr 30, 2020 · 5 likes · 6 shares · 10,119 followers View post →
Thomas Hillebrandt
@Thohi · X

@Rev11_5 @badgervindaloo @oohglobbits5 @TakeThatEpi @Wolfpak561 @magnetronmagne1 @antallan @LukeAnglindoor @JoshuaVats @WpnsLoadToad @willsworldview @adrianturner01 @FredMacManus @Squawkatoo2 @Phoenix42505497 @warm_woobie @fearing_aid @RossGilroy @JohnKrahn2 @yourmomspants1 @SBuddie1877 @lrochellebeck @PrinceOfAtheism @RobertBrownie @triggerman1976 @Foreign_Dude @robgmortlock @Avic_Wins @CatholicXX @geraldpayne25 @Cleisthenes5 @JohnJotink @PerfectHolyGod @remnantofisr53 @faithdefender @R0samond @Karlarei2003 @AislygnEliyan @BlunderMark @hauxton @TimSteppingOut @NotLordByron @adored_2 @lightofthecross @LisaWinslow @CindyJC007 @Jayy83x @ToddW29538160 @LindaEver4 @Ghazzalistic They are, however, nor exempt from evolutionary change, despite - similar to Limulidae - being quite successful. https://t.co/rC9JLFQOQS

Jan 3, 2020 · 244 followers View post →
Yael Dragwyla
@YDrgwyla · X

Living Fossils, Evolution, and Cryptids https://t.co/HbYQy242TN via @YouTube

Jul 3, 2019 · 25 followers View post →
TELL THE ACCOUNT OWNER TO GET OFF X Please
@Domoviye2 · X

@cdotpratt1 @8fiveBibby @SteveStuWill Here's a video that talks about living fossils. It doesn't cover gecko's, but raises some good points. https://t.co/6hKKQyAyYL

Jan 15, 2019 · 356 followers View post →
REcords (Nice guy)
@Records_iutu · X

Agregué un video a una lista de reproducción de @YouTube https://t.co/6RFRWp6z8L Living Fossils, Evolution, and Cryptids

Jan 6, 2019 · 2 followers View post →
The Cambrian Mammal
@naraoia.bsky.social · Bluesky

Casane & Laurenti against "living fossil" bullshit: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bies.201200145/abstract;jsessionid=912DF3E7C4FF37F4EA0A25B35C003B97.d02t02

Feb 5, 2013 View post →