「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/OBhDZOg4TQ
Why coelacanths are not 'living fossils': a review of molecular and morphological data.
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
Feb 2013 – Sep 2025Where it's discussed
-
X / Twitter110 posts
-
YouTube11 videos
-
News6 articles
-
Blogs6 articles
-
Facebook5 posts
-
Bluesky1 posts
AI synopsis
What people are saying
The discussions demonstrate a strong collective interest in clarifying misconceptions about coelacanths, with frequent references to scientific data and critiques of simplistic labels like 'living fossils.' Words like 'misleading,' 'support,' and 'evolutionary' signal a respectful yet critical tone that emphasizes scientific accuracy and deeper engagement with the topic.
Most posters acknowledge that coelacanths are not 'living fossils' and support the article's conclusions, though some express nuanced views.
Discussions show high interest with multiple mentions of the article, related data, and evolutionary concepts, indicating curiosity and engagement.
Posts often reference specific research, challenge misconceptions, or share videos explaining the topic, reflecting meaningful engagement.
The discussion highlights a shift towards clarifying misconceptions about evolution and fossil classification, which could influence public understanding and scientific communication.
Abstract in brief
- Recent studies on coelacanths show that their slow evolution in both molecular and morphological aspects does not mean they are "living fossils," as previously thought.
- The assumption that low genetic variation indicates a low mutation rate is flawed, and studies showing higher mutation rates are often ignored.
- Morphological stability in coelacanths is not strongly supported by fossil evidence, and the idea of them being primitive or unchanged from ancient times is questioned from an evolutionary perspective.]
Top posts
Most liked on X and Bluesky4. жиҳатдан ўзгариб борганини исботлаган. Пруф: https://t.co/BQQgJpevEk Келинг, тушунмаган нарсамизга аралашмаймиз, аралашгимиз келса, ҳақиқий тадқиқотларни ўқиймиз, шарлатанларга эмас, олимларга ишонамиз.
In the new Stated Casually video (my weekend project) I used fitness landscapes to show how it is that organisms can get evolutionarily "stuck". It was super fun to make! https://t.co/YtjjQsGh2b https://t.co/4AaA9zZ6G7
そもそも「シーラカンス類の"進化速度"は遅い」は本当なのかという問題があるのを思い出した。 https://t.co/LHRbJJ7q4o
[FLASHBACK SSAFT] Mise à jour bienvenue du billet de @p_laurenti sur l'inanité de considérer le coelacanthe comme un fossile vivant, hébergé sur #SSAFT https://t.co/ByhEqfHRaM et qui a mené à une véritable publication scientifique dans la foulée : https://t.co/2rdVYRiNVf https://t.co/j3JIQ1TCY9
Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ A review of molecular and morphological data @JacksonWheat1 @StevenDJBaumann https://t.co/cdpDJV2DZC https://t.co/OZwD8TSYBj https://t.co/qTEN7DZ9Ue https://t.co/94ecW4QP8K https://t.co/1WCsbaGViQ https://t.co/vKOOzT3Omc
All mentions
Reevaluating Living Fossils and Evolutionary Relationships
This video explores the scientific evidence behind living fossils like coelacanths, challenging misconceptions about their evolutionary status. Recent research indicates that morphological and molecular data do not…
Understanding the Evolutionary Significance of the Coelacanth Species
The African coelacanth, discovered in 1938 and once thought extinct, offers insights into ancient fish related to land animal ancestors. Its genome helps us understand vertebrate adaptation to land, focusing on…
Reevaluating Evolutionary Theories with Ancient Fish Species Insights
This video explores how ancient species like coelacanths challenge traditional evolutionary ideas and provides insights from genome analysis on vertebrate adaptation to land.
Debunking the Myth of Living Fossils in Evolutionary Science
Recently, studies show coelacanths' slow evolution does not make them "living fossils." Morphological stability is questioned, and the low genetic variation assumption is flawed. Learn the scientific perspective on this…
Reevaluating the Concept of Living Fossils in Coelacanths and Limuloids
Recent studies reveal that coelacanths' slow evolution does not imply they are 'living fossils.' Morphological stability is unsupported by fossil evidence, challenging the idea of their primitive or unchanged status…
A EVOLUÇÃO INSANA do CELACANTO!
Reevaluating Coelacanths as Rethinking Living Fossil Classification
Recent studies show coelacanths' slow evolution does not classify them as living fossils. Molecular and morphological data suggest their stability may be overestimated, challenging traditional views based on fossil…
Understanding the Reality of Living Fossils and Coelacanths
Explore what defines a living fossil and analyze recent research showing their evolution is more dynamic than previously believed, challenging traditional views of coelacanths as unchanged ancient species.
Reevaluating Coelacanths as Living Fossils Using Molecular and Morphological Data
Recent studies indicate that coelacanths' slow evolution does not classify them as 'living fossils.' Molecular and morphological analyses reveal higher mutation rates and morphological diversity, challenging traditional…
Reevaluating Coelacanths as Living Fossils in Evolutionary Contexts
Recent studies show that coelacanths' slow evolution does not qualify them as 'living fossils.' Morphological stability is questioned, and low genetic variation does not imply low mutation rates, challenging previous…
Reevaluating the Concept of Living Fossils in Coelacanths
Recent studies show that coelacanths' slow evolution does not classify them as living fossils. Their low genetic variation and morphological stability are questioned with new molecular and fossil evidence, challenging…
Understanding Coelacanths as Modern Evolving Species
Recent research shows that coelacanths are not 'living fossils' despite slow evolution in genetics and morphology. The idea that low genetic variation indicates a primitive status is flawed, and fossil evidence…
@NotEvolution1 The first fish to walk out of water is thought to be a SPINED/chordate fish of the Dipnoi class. Their lineage split from other sarcopterygians like coelacanths ~416MYr ago. Coelacanths are not “living fossils” as in “unevolved” the show expected mutations https://t.co/DY4LF6jLNT https://t.co/jwtFkzyOmV
@Ralph_9000 @AteosSF No comprendo muy bien que tienen que ver las gallinas con los dinosaurios, pero el artículo ql que te refiero no menciona ni una sola gallina. ¿Comprendiste lo que se explica ahí sobre el "drift" genético? Te lo pongo de nuevo por si perdiste el link. https://t.co/viF568CDN3
@Ralph_9000 @AteosSF No soy experto en biología, pero siéntete en libertad de desmentir este artículo punto por punto: https://t.co/viF568CDN3
https://t.co/TyTygji6g3
https://t.co/L1EJnMtP6a
RT @MinutoDaTerra: Corre lá pro YouTube e conheça as espécies que quebraram a teoria da evolução! https://t.co/3bxnrHEAHf
Corre lá pro YouTube e conheça as espécies que quebraram a teoria da evolução! https://t.co/3bxnrHEAHf
https://t.co/yGH0C3eIEo
29. https://t.co/KE2thccXhN
Casane, D., & Laurenti, P. (2013). Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ A review of molecular and morphological data. Bioessays, 35(4), 332-338.
RT @Visceral9000: @kplme5 Plus the term living fossil is still very misleading. Which is why many scientific educators and academics advise…
@kplme5 Plus the term living fossil is still very misleading. Which is why many scientific educators and academics advise not to used it. Here is a video about it! https://t.co/Aov8kbE5zF
Have I mentioned recently that fish don't exist? Maybe keep this in mind for a week or so.
RT @JacksonWheat1: @Lepidodendron I did a video recently on the problems with “living fossils”: https://t.co/cc2898q13O
@Lepidodendron I did a video recently on the problems with “living fossils”: https://t.co/cc2898q13O
@Helgoose_Comix Fun Fact: mudbug is a more taxonomically appropriate name than shellfish. (As arthropods, they're more closely related to bugs than fish.) https://t.co/Njxc53Xmrp
@EMaxwell56 @LolaGoog32641 @NotEvolution1 No, it isn’t evidence for stasis. https://t.co/H3jD9JRKy8 https://t.co/YF7fcNQQxU
RT @JacksonWheat1: https://t.co/NcnQORsiF5
https://t.co/NcnQORsiF5
@MissouriLibert2 @denvertigrz @MrJohns52403217 @Haemish857 @piper4missouri The trilobites we have today are absolutely nothing like the trilobites that are extinct. That's like saying "I was told the dinosaurs went extinct but birds still exist!" I mean, sure, birds are dinosaurs, but the non-avians didn't survive. https://t.co/rX8dAA7wul
https://t.co/Vs1ahUS9C7
@AfoutK @TaRkOTheSparrow @kenshiro370 @LeContempIateur Je pense qu'il parle de ce passage mais je laisse les auteurs de cette publication, lui répondre. https://t.co/adev0YucOF https://t.co/LZ9zayjyOP
@kenshiro370 @LeContempIateur Oh qu'es que c'est con ! On a des études qui démontre que Cœlacanthe et sa famille ont subit des évolutions morphologique au cours du temps ! https://t.co/IibyasGcxs https://t.co/KCuYZLzuch
@Patrick_JOJO @MickaCorreia Bah si, les espèces sont pas fixe dans le temps d'où l'fait que "les fossiles vivants" reste un mythe aux yeux des paléontologues https://t.co/vsntNf5A5J Puis bon, c'est à la porte du fixisme spé génération spontanée ce genre de sorties.
https://t.co/BQQgJpevEk https://t.co/TIPUkFf7z7 https://t.co/yO8IOkadCq https://t.co/lS1iu8eeFQ https://t.co/7laATJdV79 Ва ҳ.к.
4. жиҳатдан ўзгариб борганини исботлаган. Пруф: https://t.co/BQQgJpevEk Келинг, тушунмаган нарсамизга аралашмаймиз, аралашгимиз келса, ҳақиқий тадқиқотларни ўқиймиз, шарлатанларга эмас, олимларга ишонамиз.
@GabriielN_ @FredhRodrigues Tem esses artigos aqui: https://t.co/aSu7AUbrkc https://t.co/hxgCmXglLx https://t.co/RGAg6NAwnB
@cr69to420 @Orland_Sundri @DannyLovesPizza @TakeThatDarwin @iluminatibot https://t.co/AvGo6E0tkP
@JSongwriter49 @TakeThatDarwin @antallan @SecularOutpost @ProfBrianCox https://t.co/AvGo6E0tkP https://t.co/PkeRoGahHw
RT @kaisekiriu: そもそも「シーラカンス類の"進化速度"は遅い」は本当なのかという問題があるのを思い出した。 https://t.co/LHRbJJ7q4o
RT @kaisekiriu: そもそも「シーラカンス類の"進化速度"は遅い」は本当なのかという問題があるのを思い出した。 https://t.co/LHRbJJ7q4o
そもそも「シーラカンス類の"進化速度"は遅い」は本当なのかという問題があるのを思い出した。 https://t.co/LHRbJJ7q4o
@dan_cameron99 @MrJohns52403217 @liberal_jamie @Guy_JustaGuy3 @LannisterLeo @depth_ocean_ @_truthswordsa @umfpt @hubie0 @waiting4evidnce @RebelATliance @girmayyy @mirandaisrisen @BrianNazarenus @megafant1 @ForrestRichardA @ScientiaPercept @1Quetzalcoatl1 @LucZeph @remofjacob_ @daren_wedge @kester_lowers @dirk_fasshauer @DarkCowboyGod @orna_verum @EdgeZeto @DementedHuman @StevenB45193461 @ChrisLeePike @FifthDonkey @CodexMma @MephistoTabern1 @CarusoLawLV @D_D_1983 @rkdoctr @ericlovesvinyl @1pckt @themucusonkel @SecularSmurf @WatkinsFolly @ax2n38 @Chortling_Man @NHoomans @OnlyaMoment3 @DeanoMartino1 @badgervindaloo @Infeterrence @TakeThatDarwin @robburdack @Dwyertd Coelacanths have a very rich fossil history and we’re very morphologically diverse between the Devonian and Carboniferous. https://t.co/WXVIotyym5 https://t.co/6fXCBbLA0I https://t.co/IoYPFMiqzG
Evolutionen precis som tiden är i konstant förändring, men evolutionen kan gå snabbt eller långsamt dock aldrig stanna, något som tydligt märks kring idén om "levande fossiler" som egentligen bara har hittat en "perfekt form" som inte behövt förbättras https://t.co/XC72zaACLl
RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…
RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…
RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…
RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…
RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…
RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…
RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…
RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…
RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…
RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…
RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…
RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…
RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…
RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…
RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…
RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…
RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…
RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…
Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/QnV1usJwdJ
RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…
RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…
Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ A review of molecular and morphological data (First published: 04 February 2013) https://t.co/NT0DyurQ7q Figure 1でCoelacanthusとあるのは… https://t.co/cm3SBTEH1o
RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…
RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…
RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…
RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…
RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…
RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…
RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…
RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…
RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…
RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…
RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…
RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…
RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…
RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…
RT @ykimura_bio: 「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/O…
「シーラカンスが「生きた化石」ではない理由」 色々あげていますが、進化をあまり知らない人は系統樹の描き方で誤解する人も多いですね。 Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ https://t.co/OBhDZOg4TQ
@Obadiah_3 @ICRscience Coelacanths never went extinct as lungfish and both actually went on their own evolutionary radiations separate from tetrapods. https://t.co/6fXCBbM7Qg That being said they’re still love-finned fish and are genetically closer to us than to other fishes. https://t.co/Eav2w2Xqog
@ImaneRod Les biologistes évitent de plus en plus l'expression "fossile vivant". Un billet de @p_laurenti sur mon blog pour expliquer cela https://t.co/8uGceqhlfl (et une revue en anglais) https://t.co/2rdVYRiNVf
RT @pierrekerner: @astropierre @M_Lablouse Pour des avis moins tranchés que le mien et celui de @p_laurenti sur la question : @PaleonewsFr…
@astropierre @M_Lablouse Pour des avis moins tranchés que le mien et celui de @p_laurenti sur la question : @PaleonewsFrance https://t.co/OjsoSpqGBk et @StatedClearly https://t.co/i0zhSwfRkF
Did the Coelacanth stop evolving? Evolution Questions #22 https://t.co/BIxoxdqGN3 via @YouTube
@EKorteweg @054durin @Yahoo See e.g. https://t.co/O6bFOr5fPP
@duncstorey @MarvinDigeorgio @leo_behe @BittyBuddha @Shann_Q0 If you're genuinely curious read: https://t.co/O6bFOr5fPP What changes would you expect to have occurred?
@duncstorey @MarvinDigeorgio @leo_behe @BittyBuddha @Shann_Q0 See e.g. https://t.co/O6bFOr5fPP
@Orang_Hutan_ @WilliamFouts Here are some papers: https://t.co/20ElpDKDc3. https://t.co/sweRA7ZOZX
#FunFact: Bony fish such as salmon are more closely related to dolphins than they are to cartilaginous fish like sharks. #Biology https://t.co/V7kjUXTLCD
RT @StatedClearly: In the new Stated Casually video (my weekend project) I used fitness landscapes to show how it is that organisms can get…
RT @StatedClearly: In the new Stated Casually video (my weekend project) I used fitness landscapes to show how it is that organisms can get…
RT @StatedClearly: In the new Stated Casually video (my weekend project) I used fitness landscapes to show how it is that organisms can get…
In the new Stated Casually video (my weekend project) I used fitness landscapes to show how it is that organisms can get evolutionarily "stuck". It was super fun to make! https://t.co/YtjjQsGh2b https://t.co/4AaA9zZ6G7
RT @StatedClearly: Nothing like a coelacanth evolution murder mystery on a Monday afternoon: https://t.co/YtjjQsGh2b
RT @StatedClearly: Nothing like a coelacanth evolution murder mystery on a Monday afternoon: https://t.co/YtjjQsGh2b
RT @StatedClearly: Nothing like a coelacanth evolution murder mystery on a Monday afternoon: https://t.co/YtjjQsGh2b
Nothing like a coelacanth evolution murder mystery on a Monday afternoon: https://t.co/YtjjQsGh2b
Liked on YouTube: Living Fossils, Evolution, and Cryptids https://t.co/pdGqViOKq8
Watch "Living Fossils, Evolution, and Cryptids" on YouTube https://t.co/kCuUkDOEpS
Living Fossils, Evolution, and Cryptids https://t.co/gD0QcpL3OC via @YouTube
https://t.co/JcsQ6cQ3ia
RT @BrianSidlauskas: @DrCraigMc @SolomonRDavid @PREAUX_FISH @fishvecchio The body shape diversity of extinct coelacanths far exceeds that o…
@DrCraigMc @SolomonRDavid @PREAUX_FISH @fishvecchio The body shape diversity of extinct coelacanths far exceeds that of the two living species. See article here by Casane and Laurenti. https://t.co/ieOzaPBpGe
Living Fossils, Evolution, and Cryptids - YouTube https://t.co/Y094J1nddM
Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ A review of molecular and morphological data @JacksonWheat1 @StevenDJBaumann https://t.co/cdpDJV2DZC https://t.co/OZwD8TSYBj https://t.co/qTEN7DZ9Ue https://t.co/94ecW4QP8K https://t.co/1WCsbaGViQ https://t.co/vKOOzT3Omc
I love Trey the Explainer, but the creationists in the beginning BROKE MY BRAIN. STOP GUYS. https://t.co/5a0vcSmVuM
RT @pierrekerner: [FLASHBACK SSAFT] Mise à jour bienvenue du billet de @p_laurenti sur l'inanité de considérer le coelacanthe comme un foss…
RT @pierrekerner: [FLASHBACK SSAFT] Mise à jour bienvenue du billet de @p_laurenti sur l'inanité de considérer le coelacanthe comme un foss…
RT @pierrekerner: [FLASHBACK SSAFT] Mise à jour bienvenue du billet de @p_laurenti sur l'inanité de considérer le coelacanthe comme un foss…
RT @pierrekerner: [FLASHBACK SSAFT] Mise à jour bienvenue du billet de @p_laurenti sur l'inanité de considérer le coelacanthe comme un foss…
RT @pierrekerner: [FLASHBACK SSAFT] Mise à jour bienvenue du billet de @p_laurenti sur l'inanité de considérer le coelacanthe comme un foss…
RT @pierrekerner: [FLASHBACK SSAFT] Mise à jour bienvenue du billet de @p_laurenti sur l'inanité de considérer le coelacanthe comme un foss…
[FLASHBACK SSAFT] Mise à jour bienvenue du billet de @p_laurenti sur l'inanité de considérer le coelacanthe comme un fossile vivant, hébergé sur #SSAFT https://t.co/ByhEqfHRaM et qui a mené à une véritable publication scientifique dans la foulée : https://t.co/2rdVYRiNVf https://t.co/j3JIQ1TCY9
@Rev11_5 @badgervindaloo @oohglobbits5 @TakeThatEpi @Wolfpak561 @magnetronmagne1 @antallan @LukeAnglindoor @JoshuaVats @WpnsLoadToad @willsworldview @adrianturner01 @FredMacManus @Squawkatoo2 @Phoenix42505497 @warm_woobie @fearing_aid @RossGilroy @JohnKrahn2 @yourmomspants1 @SBuddie1877 @lrochellebeck @PrinceOfAtheism @RobertBrownie @triggerman1976 @Foreign_Dude @robgmortlock @Avic_Wins @CatholicXX @geraldpayne25 @Cleisthenes5 @JohnJotink @PerfectHolyGod @remnantofisr53 @faithdefender @R0samond @Karlarei2003 @AislygnEliyan @BlunderMark @hauxton @TimSteppingOut @NotLordByron @adored_2 @lightofthecross @LisaWinslow @CindyJC007 @Jayy83x @ToddW29538160 @LindaEver4 @Ghazzalistic They are, however, nor exempt from evolutionary change, despite - similar to Limulidae - being quite successful. https://t.co/rC9JLFQOQS
Living Fossils, Evolution, and Cryptids https://t.co/HbYQy242TN via @YouTube
@cdotpratt1 @8fiveBibby @SteveStuWill Here's a video that talks about living fossils. It doesn't cover gecko's, but raises some good points. https://t.co/6hKKQyAyYL
Agregué un video a una lista de reproducción de @YouTube https://t.co/6RFRWp6z8L Living Fossils, Evolution, and Cryptids
Casane & Laurenti against "living fossil" bullshit: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bies.201200145/abstract;jsessionid=912DF3E7C4FF37F4EA0A25B35C003B97.d02t02