Barth, Munder, Gerger et al network meta-analysis demonstrating minor differences between psychotherapies for depression. (Updated by @pimcuijpers et al this year with similar results) https://t.co/jf0Nr62ZBq https://t.co/uepcNZ1dw0
Comparative efficacy of seven psychotherapeutic interventions for patients with depression: a network meta-analysis.
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
Jan 2020 – Oct 2025Where it's discussed
-
Facebook22 posts
-
News14 articles
-
X / Twitter10 posts
-
Blogs9 articles
-
YouTube2 videos
-
Reddit2 posts
AI synopsis
What people are saying
The overall tone demonstrates moderate support and curiosity about the study's implications, highlighted by mentions of the study's scale and its endorsement of multiple therapies as effective, using phrases like 'now we need to start research' and referencing the study's comprehensive data, which reflect both recognition of its significance and desire for further exploration.
Most discussions acknowledge the study's findings that multiple psychotherapies are comparably effective, with some emphasizing the minimal differences among them.
Participants show moderate interest, discussing the implications for psychotherapy practices, with mentions of the need for further research and neurobiological integration.
There is some deep engagement, as many discussions reference the methodology of the meta-analysis, such as the study's scope involving over 15,000 patients, and the importance of tailoring treatments.
The discussions recognize that the study could influence therapeutic approaches and mental health policies, indicated by phrases like 'necessary next steps' and references to integrating neuroscience.
Abstract in brief
- This study used a network meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness of seven psychotherapeutic treatments for adult depression, analyzing data from 198 studies with over 15,000 patients.
- All seven therapies were more effective than a waitlist control, with moderate to large effect sizes, but differences among the therapies were small or negligible.
- Factors like study size and quality influenced results, with larger and higher-quality studies showing smaller effects; among therapies, cognitive-behavioral, interpersonal, and problem-solving therapy were most consistently effective.
Top posts
Most liked on X and Blueskyどんぐりの背比べ。 #PLOSMedicine: Comparative Efficacy of Seven Psychotherapeutic Interventions for Patients with Depression: A ... https://t.co/8AAR64F93S
@EikoFried @tkaiser_science @Martin_Ploederl Try this one: https://t.co/lu85McDAPR
@quarante__cinq @adri1bouboupv D’ailleurs la source que tu voulais la dernière fois https://t.co/ECDgFc06sd
RT @IoanaA_Cristea: Barth, Munder, Gerger et al network meta-analysis demonstrating minor differences between psychotherapies for depressio…
RT @IoanaA_Cristea: Barth, Munder, Gerger et al network meta-analysis demonstrating minor differences between psychotherapies for depressio…
All mentions
Natural Strategies for Depression Without Medication Insights
This video explores the science behind natural solutions for depression. It discusses restoring thyroid balance, reducing inflammation, improving gut microbiome, and the effectiveness of psychotherapies, exercise…
Environmental Factors and Depression: Biological and Public Health Impacts
This video explores how environmental exposures like urban living and climate change influence depression by affecting brain function and biochemistry, highlighting the importance of integrating environmental issues…
@PTTPB_pl @SWPSUniversity @RzeczPacjenta @Leszczyna @MGolbik @MarekKos5 @S_Goncerz @PankiewiczJulia @jacekwykowski @MajaHermanMD @CowZdrowiu @rynekzdrowia @Puls_Medycyny To już mamy. Teraz konieczne jest rozpoczęcie badań nad efektywnymi technikami stosowanymi w różnych rodzajach terapii, łącząc je ze współczesną neuronauką. To dotyczy każdego nurtu. https://t.co/CzWRJJ0Kfg https://t.co/fQg7lCW5Dc https://t.co/xvUxFKcTig https://t.co/tKmOFcremD
@LJS_Berlin @ThosVarley @balazskegl https://t.co/xHXWszqx17
Referans: Barth, J., Munder, T., Gerger, H., Nüesch, E., Trelle, S., Znoj, H., Jüni, P., & Cuijpers, P. (2013). Comparative efficacy of seven psychotherapeutic interventions for patients with depression: A network meta-analysis. PLoS Medicine, 10(5). https://t.co/dUvLBGFP8V
https://t.co/mOX5GRy91j Comparative Efficacy of Seven Psychotherapeutic Interventions for Patients with Depression: A Network Meta-Analysis #psychology #therapy
@quarante__cinq @adri1bouboupv D’ailleurs la source que tu voulais la dernière fois https://t.co/ECDgFc06sd
RT @IoanaA_Cristea: Barth, Munder, Gerger et al network meta-analysis demonstrating minor differences between psychotherapies for depressio…
RT @IoanaA_Cristea: Barth, Munder, Gerger et al network meta-analysis demonstrating minor differences between psychotherapies for depressio…
Barth, Munder, Gerger et al network meta-analysis demonstrating minor differences between psychotherapies for depression. (Updated by @pimcuijpers et al this year with similar results) https://t.co/jf0Nr62ZBq https://t.co/uepcNZ1dw0
どんぐりの背比べ。 #PLOSMedicine: Comparative Efficacy of Seven Psychotherapeutic Interventions for Patients with Depression: A ... https://t.co/8AAR64F93S
@EikoFried @tkaiser_science @Martin_Ploederl Try this one: https://t.co/lu85McDAPR
IC
坂P
MP
B
FN
SY
Ł
ÁB
C
J