N Engl J Med October 2013 PMID 23992601

Saxagliptin and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Benjamin M Scirica, Deepak L Bhatt, Eugene Braunwald, P Gabriel Steg, Jaime Davidson, Boaz Hirshberg, Peter Ohman, Robert Frederich, Stephen D Wiviott, Elaine B Hoffman, Matthew A Cavender, Jacob A Udell, Nihar R Desai, Ofri Mosenzon, Darren K McGuire

Download social card

Mentions

59
Peak: 1 in Apr 2020
across 5 sources since Apr 2020

Extended reach

8,972
potential audience

Total likes

20

Video views

383

Mentions per month

Apr 2020 – Jul 2025

Where it's discussed

  • News24 articles
  • Facebook21 posts
  • Blogs9 articles
  • X / Twitter3 posts
  • YouTube2 videos

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The social discussions mention key findings such as the lack of significant harm from saxagliptin and the 27% hospitalization rate, using terms like 'safe option' and 'mixed results', showing an interest in balancing safety and risk. The tone remains analytical but moderate, reflecting a cautious engagement with the study's implications.

AgreementNeither agree nor disagree

Most discussions acknowledge the study's results, highlighting safety and mixed outcomes, showing neither full agreement nor disagreement.

InterestModerate interest

Comments indicate a moderate level of curiosity about the cardiovascular effects and safety data, but lack deep engagement.

EngagementNeutral engagement

There is some referencing of specific trials and outcomes, but overall comments are brief and surface-level.

ImpactModerate impact

The discussions suggest the article influences ongoing debates about medication safety but do not seem to drastically change clinical practice or opinions.

Abstract in brief

  • The study found that saxagliptin, a diabetes medication, did not significantly change the risk of major cardiovascular events like heart attack or stroke compared to a placebo.
  • Patients taking saxagliptin had a slightly higher rate of hospitalization for heart failure than those on placebo, but rates of pancreatitis were similar in both groups.
  • Overall, saxagliptin was found to be neither harmful nor beneficial in terms of cardiovascular safety, indicating it is a safe option for managing blood sugar in patients at risk of heart problems.

Top posts

Most liked on X and Bluesky
cardio-met
@cardiomet_CE · X

24c)

May 11, 2022 · 2 likes · 4,219 followers View post →
tune
@keisuke4713 · X

アテローム性動脈硬化:DPP4調節https://t.co/Ra6QXxUjb5 実験動物で有益 ヒトでDPP4阻害の心血管効果は一貫性ない https://t.co/LoidVcwoJq SAVOR-TIMI53試験 Saxagliptin群心不全入院27%⬆️ https://t.co/dwkFbGU4WJ EXAMINE試験 心不全入院alogliptin群3.1%>placebo群2.9% https://t.co/tJxf80qOjC

Nov 24, 2023 · 3,743 followers View post →

All mentions

tune
@keisuke4713 · X

アテローム性動脈硬化:DPP4調節https://t.co/Ra6QXxUjb5 実験動物で有益 ヒトでDPP4阻害の心血管効果は一貫性ない https://t.co/LoidVcwoJq SAVOR-TIMI53試験 Saxagliptin群心不全入院27%⬆️ https://t.co/dwkFbGU4WJ EXAMINE試験 心不全入院alogliptin群3.1%>placebo群2.9% https://t.co/tJxf80qOjC

Nov 24, 2023 · 3,743 followers View post →
cardio-met
@cardiomet_CE · X

24c)

May 11, 2022 · 2 likes · 4,219 followers View post →
Edward Enterprises
@EdwardEnterpri3 · X

Comment on Udell et al. Saxagliptin and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Moderate or Severe Renal Impairment: Observations From the SAVOR-TIMI 53 Trial. Diabetes Care 2015;38:696–705 | Diabetes Care https://t.co/FHrt56RJ1I

Jun 1, 2020 · 628 followers View post →