Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The discussions frequently reference scientific consensus and research findings, such as the statement that 'the scientific research conducted so far has not detected any significant hazards directly connected with the use of GE crops.' Phrases like 'no credible reports of harm have emerged' and 'thousands of studies have been done' convey a tone of conviction and urgency, emphasizing the perceived safety and importance of the article's conclusions.
Many discussions reveal a consensus that aligns with the publication's findings, indicating general support for the conclusions drawn about genetically engineered crops.
The volume of responses shows a high level of curiosity and relevance around the topic, suggesting it's a hot issue among participants.
While some posts demonstrate a moderate level of engagement by referencing specific studies, many simply echo general sentiments.
There is a strong belief among users that the publication's findings hold significant sway in the ongoing debate about genetically engineered crops.
Segundo: 6 papers/informes de organismos oficiales avalando la seguridad de los transgénicos (no, tampoco dan alergias): https://t.co/NFDekd1jCt https://t.co/6im5LgZRB2 https://t.co/ZzIXGTJ249 https://t.co/iEPe0TCkYi https://t.co/kjtjOaTAai https://t.co/mLcfNkGuVp
@NiiCccoooooo Hum dans ton monde imaginaire peut-être, mais dans la réalité non, tiens si tu veux : une méta-analyse de 1 783 études https://t.co/qxuZ6pLcST
Vamos allá con los transgénicos pues: Estos 2 pedazo meta-análisis, que no han sido realizados por el sector privado, son los que se suelen esgrimir y contra los anti-transgénicos comunes: 1.https://t.co/1E5x6Zv2dl 2.https://t.co/lpeEEPpKFe
From Europe in 2013: An overview of the last 10 years of genetically engineered crop safety research. Yes, GMOs have been researched. Yes, GMOs have been studied. Yes, GMO crops have been shown as safe. This is the scientific consensus. https://t.co/fcyzV6CZkV @GMOinfoEU https://t.co/vjmUwqkokK
@PabloAndreone @josepzin @SebaPoblete @DanielNorero @JoaquinBaranao @ChileBio_AG @ScienceAlly @mark_lynas @jmmulet @elnocturno @BumperCrop1 @OperadorNuclear @marcelomena @cescept @argenbiooficial @LuisDeStefano @sofia_valenzuel
近十年的研究报告显示，食用转基因作物的风险与非转基因作物相当（ Eating GMO plants is no more risky than their non-GMO equivalent）：https://t.co/T8Y99NllTq。 另外，关于转基因食品，推荐观看这个科普： B站：https://t.co/u1I707zuSJ Youtube：https://t.co/KXyWFXWwU5 https://t.co/YM6j1cdrra
In this video, Abbey Sharp analyzes the most outrageous diet advice circulating online today. With a focus on educating viewers, she emphasizes the importance of consulting healthcare providers about personal health…
This podcast explores the scientific findings on genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and Roundup herbicide, addressing long-term health implications. Recent studies indicate significant health risks associated with GM…
This episode explores the scientific development and impacts of GM crops, including reducing pesticide use, increasing yields, and boosting farmer profits, especially in developing countries. It also addresses safety…
The last 10 years have seen extensive research on the safety of genetically engineered (GE) crops. This video discusses key findings showing no significant hazards linked to GE crops, highlighting the scientific…
@elleonwheels @GEHonesty my sources are peer reviewed & confirmed by experience. yours make money sowing unfounded fears. neither data nor experience support their claims. https://t.co/xJ2vl0ogs4 & https://t.co/o7LQPHM4L9 & https://t.co/ieCR1WwtKK
Prof Olav Mella gave an overview of the last 10 years of research into autoantibody reduction as a treatment for #ME/CFS. He presented the research conducted by his team on rituximab and cyclophosphamide. Rituximab binds to the CD20 antigen on B cells and destroys them. Cyclophosphamide acts
Prof Olav Mella gives an overview of the last 10 years of research into autoantibody reduction as a treatment for ME/CFS. He presents the research conducted by his team on rituximab and cyclophosphamide. [18 mins] +Transcript tinyurl.com/mvz5v5kv
@eljefedemijefe @CainHeleverok Aucune ironie ici. Les gènes des OGM se dispersent de la même manière que les gènes des non-OGM, en quoi est-ce un risque spécifique aux OGM ? Aucun impact négatif sur la biodiversité, cf votre propre lien : https://t.co/x04gelNUcv Méta-analyse : https://t.co/JWowGp7tl9
RT @obinique: @Efficlint @pshegs Here are some key peer-review papers on GMO safety and agricultural biotechnology, copy and search them in…
@KuntoAjiW Nicolia, A., Manzo, A., Veronesi, F., & Rosellini, D. (2014). An overview of the last 10 years of genetically engineered crop safety research. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 34(1), 77–88. https://t.co/GwpLwVAyVu
@DebayanSen_ @IndianTechGuide the data conclusively show otherwise. https://t.co/RT4OvGtX4q https://t.co/PwYgZsIC6s https://t.co/qExe7GNaJ1. https://t.co/r3HzD465GI https://t.co/fuSgf1tVro https://t.co/o1l2FsXmet https://t.co/Cdry7UBcJ6 https://t.co/xjV8s4c7Ua https://t.co/yfXpTnN5Xw
Prof Olav Mella gave an overview of the last 10 years of research into autoantibody reduction as a treatment for #ME/CFS. He presented the research conducted by his team on rituximab and cyclophosphamide. Rituximab binds to the CD20 antigen on B cells and destroys them. youtube.com/watch?v=K24I...
@GMOFREEFLORIDA https://t.co/Dqk1KjP1JE
@Efficlint @pshegs Here are some key peer-review papers on GMO safety and agricultural biotechnology, copy and search them in Google. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaf7204 DOI: 10.1038/s41576-019-0180-9 DOI: 10.3109/07388551.2013.823595 I am a scientist who relies on PEER REVIEW! not emotions
RT @ACHS972: @itabustamante1 @LuisDeStefano An overview of the last 10 years of genetically engineered crop safety research: https://t.co/0…
RT @ACHS972: @itabustamante1 @LuisDeStefano An overview of the last 10 years of genetically engineered crop safety research: https://t.co/0…
@itabustamante1 @LuisDeStefano An overview of the last 10 years of genetically engineered crop safety research: https://t.co/0OvB6aoEbi
RT @prometheusgreen: @tishytopper @JohnStossel @JonEntine thousands upon thousands of studies have been done https://t.co/q9j84HzW1o see al…
@tishytopper @JohnStossel @JonEntine thousands upon thousands of studies have been done https://t.co/q9j84HzW1o see also https://t.co/r3HzD465GI
On May 1st, we will broadcast the kick-off event for the 2024 European elections of the Pirate Party Germany, which will take place online between 10 am and 8 pm. Many locations will be broadcast live and, in addition to an overview of the last 10 years of work by the Pirates in the (1/2)
@squiddy_ @AurelianoStingi Le ripercussioni sulla salute vengono studiate da decenni. I risultati, spesso ignorati dalla stampa, sono questi: https://t.co/tZfHPmkhrJ
@ThePublicSquare @ProfeErnesto1 The scientific literature and vast real world experience show the claims in this piece of negative impacts from GMO corn on ecology and human health are completely false; so too the claims of harms from associated glyphosate. https://t.co/o7LQPHLwVB & https://t.co/ieCR1WvVVc
@DextroPeds @cremieuxrecueil There are links to data in the article, including this: https://t.co/8eGe1f0YG2
@GeneticLiteracy this is total nonsense. there's no need to test anything for GMOs being sold today - none raises any safety issues & they're clearly safer than seeds/foods produced with any other production tech https://t.co/xjV8s4c7Ua https://t.co/Rak9jEJ5F6
Referencias: Nicolia A, et al. (2013). An overview of the last 10 years of genetically engineered crop safety research. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology
@AlfredoNarvaez @pardoguerra Es este, no es el único, pero s{i uno de los que mas artñiculos revisan en una ventana de tiempo amplia. https://t.co/vP5Lw5Itbb
@AndreaJArrati @annielagos @wiredenespanol Si se refiere a efectos epidemiológicos delos GMO, se han hecho muchos. Son los alimentos más seguros hasta el momento. https://t.co/MaauXTRVaG
RT @BernaldoDQuiros: @MiguelGTormo @Mairela13 @silent_hacker1 @mnesefilo @Pienso_existo19 @Isma202020 @RrdRocio @jpserranoh @cuevas_dawson…
RT @BernaldoDQuiros: @MiguelGTormo @Mairela13 @silent_hacker1 @mnesefilo @Pienso_existo19 @Isma202020 @RrdRocio @jpserranoh @cuevas_dawson…
@MiguelGTormo @Mairela13 @silent_hacker1 @mnesefilo @Pienso_existo19 @Isma202020 @RrdRocio @jpserranoh @cuevas_dawson @Neretvi @ardesangres @ChusDark @Sr_AIvarez @libertad30081 @amiguitotuyo12 @AngelJimenezA @unculemadrid @bvbrumbeck @ElMonoSabio2 @Pablojusticiero @DazRos2 @Mar45056388 @KatanaJanso @alvaroh1408 @cinicat @JosLen53802413 @ThanosLovesU @cheire27 @Pollo27570 @elfary74 @baldonauta @vmiguelito11 @ElMonoBorracho3 @javilsantos @anxbltr @ZI_UR @lgm12321 @CristoferPons @jalvhdez @libertad3098 @SonTodosIguale4 @FilipidesE @H_Hackenbush @MMvinyuales @old_spinster @seehr @Mister_A_aa @pedroj_ramirez Hay un amplio consenso cientifico que soporta le tesis según la cual los transgénicos no plantean mayor riesgo para la salud que los alimentos convencionales. https://t.co/6ktRS0OL4P
@HelmanDaniel @stuartsmyth66 Or in the full text of this Abstract? https://t.co/nbzofU05vV
@HelmanDaniel @stuartsmyth66 more than 3 decades of real world experience shows "GMO" crops are more productive, sustainable, profitable, and safer than alternatives https://t.co/m8HJMfzPDu https://t.co/IZMoIkVzTz https://t.co/gl4gqa8Ong https://t.co/xjV8s4tILI
@Gmofreeflorida1 @GMOFREEFL0RIDA @OrganicLiveFood And the other source you cite: “the scientific research conducted so far has not detected any significant hazards directly connected with the use of GE crops” https://t.co/gcnZEuy7XN
@GMOFREEFLORIDA @MigunaMiguna https://t.co/w7WOiurt4R
@GMOFREEFLORIDA @JohnSmi23447025 @hamishpricenz yeah bro try this one. https://t.co/DyobLznqWu
RT @tokumoto1122: @CAT_Q_17_2600cc 遺伝子組み換え技術の安全性評価については以下URL参照ください。GM作物の安全性、特に人や動物が食品や飼料として利用した場合の影響について、700以上の独立した研究や根拠に基づくレビュー報告です。 https…
RT @tokumoto1122: @CAT_Q_17_2600cc 遺伝子組み換え技術の安全性評価については以下URL参照ください。GM作物の安全性、特に人や動物が食品や飼料として利用した場合の影響について、700以上の独立した研究や根拠に基づくレビュー報告です。 https…
@CAT_Q_17_2600cc 遺伝子組み換え技術の安全性については以下URL参照ください。GM作物の安全性、特に人や動物が食品や飼料として利用した場合の影響について、700以上の独立した研究や根拠に基づくレビューです。 https://t.co/sIs4YXzujy
@CAT_Q_17_2600cc 遺伝子組み換え技術の安全性については以下URL参照ください。GM作物の安全性、特に人や動物が食品や飼料として利用した場合の影響について、700以上の独立した研究や根拠に基づくレビューです。 https://t.co/sIs4YXzujy
@CAT_Q_17_2600cc 遺伝子組み換え技術の安全性評価については以下URL参照ください。GM作物の安全性、特に人や動物が食品や飼料として利用した場合の影響について、700以上の独立した研究や根拠に基づくレビュー報告です。 https://t.co/sIs4YXzujy
https://t.co/RWdKPLUijK
@UnMondeRiant @Damkyan_Omega Ex https://t.co/XIml9LGAV8 ou https://t.co/78MBSsDOfQ
@NiiCccoooooo Hum dans ton monde imaginaire peut-être, mais dans la réalité non, tiens si tu veux : une méta-analyse de 1 783 études https://t.co/qxuZ6pLcST
@wankja @MacvanDinther @DaveGoulson https://t.co/zoRhKhzY39
RT @BioArnau: En 2013 este metanálisis de Nicolia et al. revisó la literatura de los 10 años anteriores y no encontró ninguna evidencia de…
En 2013 este metanálisis de Nicolia et al. revisó la literatura de los 10 años anteriores y no encontró ninguna evidencia de peligro por el uso de cultivos GMO https://t.co/R6mGlk3ILu
RT @prometheusgreen: @JD_Gaffle myriad safety studies have been done. no credible reports of harm have emerged. time to accept what the dat…
@JD_Gaffle myriad safety studies have been done. no credible reports of harm have emerged. time to accept what the data have been telling us for decades. https://t.co/KiTXOG7vbI & https://t.co/F7KaU2uQyh & https://t.co/BGojLv0oKm & https://t.co/o7LQPHLwVB https://t.co/Ns1ZEUEx33
RT @prometheusgreen: @Polypieter @AgBioWorld none of your issues are specific or limited to "GMOs" and all ignore their demonstrable benefi…
RT @BiotecnoBlog: Segundo: 6 papers/informes de organismos oficiales avalando la seguridad de los transgénicos (no, tampoco dan alergias):…
近十年的研究报告显示，食用转基因作物的风险与非转基因作物相当（ Eating GMO plants is no more risky than their non-GMO equivalent）：https://t.co/T8Y99NllTq。 另外，关于转基因食品，推荐观看这个科普： B站：https://t.co/u1I707zuSJ Youtube：https://t.co/KXyWFXWwU5 https://t.co/YM6j1cdrra
RT @BiotecnoBlog: Segundo: 6 papers/informes de organismos oficiales avalando la seguridad de los transgénicos (no, tampoco dan alergias):…
RT @BiotecnoBlog: Segundo: 6 papers/informes de organismos oficiales avalando la seguridad de los transgénicos (no, tampoco dan alergias):…
RT @BiotecnoBlog: Segundo: 6 papers/informes de organismos oficiales avalando la seguridad de los transgénicos (no, tampoco dan alergias):…
RT @BiotecnoBlog: Segundo: 6 papers/informes de organismos oficiales avalando la seguridad de los transgénicos (no, tampoco dan alergias):…
RT @BiotecnoBlog: Segundo: 6 papers/informes de organismos oficiales avalando la seguridad de los transgénicos (no, tampoco dan alergias):…
RT @BiotecnoBlog: Segundo: 6 papers/informes de organismos oficiales avalando la seguridad de los transgénicos (no, tampoco dan alergias):…
RT @BiotecnoBlog: Segundo: 6 papers/informes de organismos oficiales avalando la seguridad de los transgénicos (no, tampoco dan alergias):…
Segundo: 6 papers/informes de organismos oficiales avalando la seguridad de los transgénicos (no, tampoco dan alergias): https://t.co/NFDekd1jCt https://t.co/6im5LgZRB2 https://t.co/ZzIXGTJ249 https://t.co/iEPe0TCkYi https://t.co/kjtjOaTAai https://t.co/mLcfNkGuVp
@BlackPillBee777 @JNoireau @Lspjerem @natiovarois @_David_Pat_ @oqaqiq @MichaelVllt Élise Lucet est la meilleure pour vous servir votre soupe complotiste. Ça ne fait pas d'elle une source fiable, c'est tout le contraire. Plus de 1800 études indépendantes n'ont à ce jour pas trouvé d'impact des OGM sur la santé https://t.co/uBSpk5iopV
RT @adolfCP: @JLozano_eco @jmmulet @LostTransposon @Equo Esto parece un poco la falacia ad populum. Que una serie de políticos votados por…
@JLozano_eco @jmmulet @LostTransposon @Equo Esto parece un poco la falacia ad populum. Que una serie de políticos votados por una mayoría hayan tomado esta decisión absurda, no les hace tener la razón absoluta, y más teniendo en cuenta los estudios a largo plazo que ha habido. https://t.co/88al82vJZA
@PMintxi @rosa_torrens @FLMIRONES Es una revision bibliográfica y hasta ellos dicen que es muy pobre porque no han buscado más estudios experimentales. Siendo bastante rígidos. Pero hay otras revisiones y metaanálsis. https://t.co/88al82vJZA https://t.co/GRWo192N1z https://t.co/W0biv9KpEA
@misstoshaboo @TaylO_orr buddy, your facebook mom group just reposts monsanto conspiracy shit from grandma. actual science, fda or otherwise, indicates gmo crops and the pesticides sprayed on them are fine with a decade long track record https://t.co/I8sWSAHVEj
@ber_gor @jorge_seo Estos 2 pedazo meta-análisis, que no han sido realizados por el sector privado, han de tenerse en cuenta sí o sí: Los cultivos GMO y transgénicos en particular son seguros. 1.https://t.co/1E5x6Zv2dl 2.https://t.co/lpeEEPpKFe
や毒物が見つかったという事実もない 遺伝子組み換えが生態系を乱すという証拠もない かなり安全性を認めている https://t.co/U7WlwXAj9X 2014年の系統的レビュー 147件の実験データををまとめたうえで遺伝子組み換えの安全性はもちろん、農薬の問題についてもリサーチがなされてた 結果、遺伝子
RT @Oscar_Teix: @PabloAndreone @josepzin @SebaPoblete @DanielNorero @JoaquinBaranao @ChileBio_AG @ScienceAlly @mark_lynas @jmmulet @elnoctu…
RT @Oscar_Teix: @PabloAndreone @josepzin @SebaPoblete @DanielNorero @JoaquinBaranao @ChileBio_AG @ScienceAlly @mark_lynas @jmmulet @elnoctu…
RT @Oscar_Teix: @PabloAndreone @josepzin @SebaPoblete @DanielNorero @JoaquinBaranao @ChileBio_AG @ScienceAlly @mark_lynas @jmmulet @elnoctu…
RT @Oscar_Teix: @PabloAndreone @josepzin @SebaPoblete @DanielNorero @JoaquinBaranao @ChileBio_AG @ScienceAlly @mark_lynas @jmmulet @elnoctu…
RT @Oscar_Teix: @PabloAndreone @josepzin @SebaPoblete @DanielNorero @JoaquinBaranao @ChileBio_AG @ScienceAlly @mark_lynas @jmmulet @elnoctu…
@PabloAndreone @josepzin @SebaPoblete @DanielNorero @JoaquinBaranao @ChileBio_AG @ScienceAlly @mark_lynas @jmmulet @elnocturno @BumperCrop1 @OperadorNuclear @marcelomena @cescept @argenbiooficial @LuisDeStefano @sofia_valenzuel
@ReOpen911_info Une méta-analyse de 24 études testant les conséquences de la consommation d'OGM à long terme : https://t.co/i8Tdr6Glxn Une méta-analyse de 1 783 études sur la dangerosité des OGM pour la santé : https://t.co/VOdINhz4nq Et une analyse de l'ANSIM : https://t.co/9OGoLZteLT
@BasselaereBart Een metastudie: "The scientific research conducted so far has not detected any significant hazards directly connected with the use of GE crops." Het gevaar van ggo's leeft vooral in de hoofden van mensen, niet in de realiteit. https://t.co/MalKs4aw0I
@MdYueh Wikipedia donne simplement cette source. L'autre article ne parle pas de consensus scientifique. Tu as autre chose ? https://t.co/WyEnF3mRKA
RT @Oscar_Teix: Vamos allá con los transgénicos pues: Estos 2 pedazo meta-análisis, que no han sido realizados por el sector privado, son…
@sdelosheros @jatarama @patriciagamarra https://t.co/lpeEEPpKFe https://t.co/1E5x6Zv2dl
While we are marking 25 years of GMOs, the technology behind GMOs is much older. This month, we're looking at our history so we can better look to the future. "An overview of the last 10 years of genetically engineered crop safety research" #25YearsofGMO https://t.co/fcyzV6CZkV
While we are marking 25 years of GMOs, the technology behind GMOs is much older. This month, we're looking at our history so we can better look to the future. "An overview of the last 10 years of genetically engineered crop safety research" #25YearsofGMO https://t.co/fcyzV6CZkV
RT @GMOAnswers: While we are marking 25 years of GMOs, the technology behind GMOs is much older. This month, we're looking at our history s…
While we are marking 25 years of GMOs, the technology behind GMOs is much older. This month, we're looking at our history so we can better look to the future. "An overview of the last 10 years of genetically engineered crop safety research" #25YearsofGMO https://t.co/fcyzV6CZkV
RT @GMOAnswers: While we are marking 25 years of GMOs, the technology behind GMOs is much older. This month, we're looking at our history s…
While we are marking 25 years of GMOs, the technology behind GMOs is much older. This month, we're looking at our history so we can better look to the future. "An overview of the last 10 years of genetically engineered crop safety research" #25YearsofGMO https://t.co/fcyzV6CZkV
While we are marking 25 years of GMOs, the technology behind GMOs is much older. This month, we're looking at our history so we can better look to the future. "An overview of the last 10 years of genetically engineered crop safety research" #25YearsofGMO https://t.co/fcyzV6CZkV
@mohamedbenabdel @Rapido__off @onebirdy2 @Conflits_BN @DurocYann J'aime beaucoup le travail de @dirtybiology, surtout les sources qu'il donne systématiquement : <<OGM et la santé, méta analyses / reviews : 10 ans de recherche à la loupe : https://t.co/140maDOBO9 Long terme : https://t.co/KBygXOUZ38
@CamaradeCharles https://t.co/ry1VeTtyCF
@athimoolamias @AusCottonSci whenever safety differences have been found between "GM" vs alternatives the GM crops/foods have been safer. The data are unambiguous and GOI is captive of special interest campaigners who ignore science. https://t.co/xjV8s4c7Ua & https://t.co/wacO7PopAa & https://t.co/mOZCPlzMN9 https://t.co/RD5yAgVSCX
@Pdbruyne @ThomasRotthier @woutervhove Is selectief zijn voor wat de wetenschap zegt dan pragmatisch? Deze metastudie over 10 jaar vindt geen bewijs dat ggo's enig gevaar voor zowel mens als milieu vormen. Vind je dan niet dat er voorvechters van de wetenschap mogen zijn? https://t.co/PKJ2szSS4H
@AttilaFurioso @DrScratch @emma_ducros Vous avez pioché cette info d'un sondage dans un papier d'Angelika Hilbeck une scientifique anti-OGM notoire et soutiens de Seralini... Mais chez les biologistes, il y a bel et bien un consensus autour des OGM. https://t.co/FyJaYh8uUr
@ylcom1 @Leo__T @hugoclement @Leo_T https://t.co/JqTQIG8O6O https://t.co/TVD6AwVmNp https://t.co/ad1tlZv4xA
https://t.co/N84MUzDbBz
@SinclaireTony @BirdsareD @fcmfcs2019 @Love_Love7Peace @wlbeeton @PeterDClack @HMS_Indomitable @Dribelo1 @ClimatePoet @TonyBaduy @Kenneth72712993 @Damo__73_ @91996340e81d45a @NoelTurner194 @B_Bolshevik100 @3GHtweets @MikeDel21893959 @Matt_Clough @JackJsherebkin @dynamikcre8tor9 @corchem @Dcoronata @nicolasDenver @mesonparticle @MedBennett @GauteNilsen @TinFoilAwards @GThorston @MonkeyMyBack @MartinJBern @erlhel @TheDisproof @GuitarMan59LP @Stephen93732980 @MojoSpartan @swcrisis @sueytonius @ATomalty @d_e_mol @gloves78 @legjoints @ClimateSkeptic4 @Samanth71003012 @OG_Advisors @GillesnFio @PolAnimalAus @tracemetalclean @DMRDartford @BridgetAshmore @D16584667 Re: "I expect" Do you accept the evidence-based scientific consensus on the safety of genetically engineered (GE) plants? https://t.co/WokkHvoay4 https://t.co/hXaiXSgP5k https://t.co/mo5wm0xs7g
@ulises__lima @RepublicaBol @YerkoGarafulic Puede erosionar el suelo? Me indicas los estudios que demuestran eso? Por otro lado te comparto una investigación acerca de la seguridad de los GMO https://t.co/CxP9aIrhqR
@micosapiens @Oscar_Teix @LostTransposon @xIdolHell @jm_clavero https://t.co/8Z3XummmIe
@DieterDeCleene @JDSchoolmeester Ik vermoed dat men ivm die consensus verwijst naar deze paper: https://t.co/0L95ZQZpin Daarin staat: "The scientific research conducted so far has not detected any significant hazards directly connected with the use of GE crops" - Niet meer dan dat.
RT @GMOAnswers: From Europe in 2013: An overview of the last 10 years of genetically engineered crop safety research. Yes, GMOs have been r…
From Europe in 2013: An overview of the last 10 years of genetically engineered crop safety research. Yes, GMOs have been researched. Yes, GMOs have been studied. Yes, GMO crops have been shown as safe. This is the scientific consensus. https://t.co/fcyzV6CZkV @GMOinfoEU https://t.co/vjmUwqkokK
@modernfarmer @jerodmcdaniel @tallkward @VanceCrowe none of the "science" supporting fears of GMOs stands up to scrutiny. the science that does is overwhelming https://t.co/o7LQPHLwVB it's not even close https://t.co/Qnc7bXVrZn long term studies as well https://t.co/hvlUj5p0y1 also for animals https://t.co/Oid5xsdEjl
@YakaShinobi @RadicalLib Re: "Look up" That's nice. It's fun watching you spout the usual denialist nonsense on evidence-based scientific consensus, even as u rely on its fruits regularly. https://t.co/hXaiXSgP5k https://t.co/4juLGnLX61
@GeneralActivity @TTyrannosaur @priscian @EwonSprokler @rln_nelson @DawnTJ90 @RedDragonFly19 @robhon_ @StormSignalSA @Over400ppm @Voight_Kampff_3 @No1Trump @TWTThisIsNow @KCTaz @BubbasRanch @MartinBrampton @ladyspat1 @spock246 @MarkOkanagan @Dcoronata @ElectricElecti1 @DCottrell1956 @ItsTheAtmospher @LindsayyuleS @stevenmosher @automaticsteam @TheClimateHawk @tracemetalclean @caerbannog666 @MonkeyMyBack @ratedliberal @KirkWolak @RushhourP @jwickers @MassiMassian @notGHGs @UreyZen @bomac_macbo @kjell_yvik @Andrewemcameron @MartinJBern @struikmans @jimdtweet @CrispyCX @quieroserabuela @BernardoVerda @chriscartw83 @AltUS_ARC @POLICEMATRIX @CheezeWhiz_girl Re: "True science is never by consensus" Stop trolling. "Highlighting consensus among medical scientists increases public support for vaccines: evidence from a randomized experiment" https://t.co/DkbL08Fir1 https://t.co/hXaiXSgP5k https
@RCard955 @careygillam @emma_ducros @zaruk @mem_somerville @ACSHorg @GeneticLiteracy the data show you are wrong. https://t.co/o7LQPHLwVB & https://t.co/YMAYAAajAt https://t.co/JhZqUtuGbR
@patterson087 @robhon_ @jwickers @TTyrannosaur @priscian @EwonSprokler @rln_nelson @DawnTJ90 @RedDragonFly19 @StormSignalSA @Over400ppm @Voight_Kampff_3 @No1Trump @TWTThisIsNow @KCTaz @BubbasRanch @MartinBrampton @ladyspat1 @spock246 @MarkOkanagan @Dcoronata @ElectricElecti1 @DCottrell1956 @ItsTheAtmospher @LindsayyuleS @stevenmosher @automaticsteam @TheClimateHawk @tracemetalclean @caerbannog666 @MonkeyMyBack @ratedliberal @KirkWolak @RushhourP @MassiMassian @notGHGs @UreyZen @bomac_macbo @kjell_yvik @Andrewemcameron @MartinJBern @struikmans @jimdtweet @CrispyCX @quieroserabuela @BernardoVerda @chriscartw83 @AltUS_ARC @POLICEMATRIX @CheezeWhiz_girl Re: "You deleted 7,970 that took no position" Is there no evidence-based scientific consensus on the safety of GMOs, just because most biology abstracts take no position on this issue? https://t.co/hXaiXSgP5k https://t.co/h6qZWKPtBM
RT @sense_strand: @howagreg @PetitionE311 @LMcLachlan60 @bob_calder @gmopundit @Jack_Heinemann @robles_jdaniel @stuartsmyth66 @karl_haynes…
@howagreg @PetitionE311 @LMcLachlan60 @bob_calder @gmopundit @Jack_Heinemann @robles_jdaniel @stuartsmyth66 @karl_haynes @GeneFromNextDo1 @Olivefarmer @BioinfoTools @marcdraco63 @30ASeawitch @Flwrgirl66x @prometheusgreen @HomegrownJoan @alain_co @JodiKoberinski @nick_saik @NOtoGMOs @Resourceful1942 @SKweedgeek @trevorcharles @jp_miner @DavidKucher @DrLizaMD @Sacredwatercamp @Monsantobuster @AlainPannetier @scarletjustice9 @AdaptableFarmer @BiotecBolivia @Nathan_Donley @GMOFreeUSA @BrianHMathison @DrKristieLeong @RSaik @reddick_louis @GovCanHealth @equiterre @FDAfood @GMWatch @VICE @vicenews @BillMahrer @RobertLustigMD @DrZachBush @DrOz @DrChutkan It's the consensus among scientists for 20 years and over 2,000 papers, plus each National Academy review for the past 10 years. An overview of the last 10 years of genetically engineered crop safety research: https://t.co/gueZy5YOkD
@DIMENSION_YT -https://t.co/eTTDkaSWyg Page 171 pour la santé et 236 pour les conclusions -meta-analyse sur les dix dernieres années https://t.co/VUeeXPOaAs -https://t.co/udFqlz2w3O J'ai trouver ces sources sous cette video il y'en a aussi d'autres https://t.co/KF7dCUgPhJ
RT @Oscar_Teix: Vamos allá con los transgénicos pues: Estos 2 pedazo meta-análisis, que no han sido realizados por el sector privado, son…
RT @Oscar_Teix: Vamos allá con los transgénicos pues: Estos 2 pedazo meta-análisis, que no han sido realizados por el sector privado, son…
RT @Oscar_Teix: Vamos allá con los transgénicos pues: Estos 2 pedazo meta-análisis, que no han sido realizados por el sector privado, son…
Vamos allá con los transgénicos pues: Estos 2 pedazo meta-análisis, que no han sido realizados por el sector privado, son los que se suelen esgrimir y contra los anti-transgénicos comunes: 1.https://t.co/1E5x6Zv2dl 2.https://t.co/lpeEEPpKFe
@mind_working @MASIPAGFarmers humanity must be protected from results like these https://t.co/ieCR1WvVVc https://t.co/IYeZLMBJ0a https://t.co/o7LQPHLwVB https://t.co/7D8ipakmUL
@MontyBoa99 @StormMela @MsActiviss even if that were entirely true (it's not) - so what? study after study after study, for decades, and vast experience has shown "GMOs" are safe. They've made huge positive contributions without harm. Get out of the way. https://t.co/ieCR1WvVVc & https://t.co/o7LQPHLwVB https://t.co/4mPP5SkHZH
@petraprez https://t.co/ZhFQ6KybTk
@FoEEmergingTech @moravec_tomas @Bowenchris @US_FDA @antonioregalado here are just two of the many relevant papers https://t.co/8ZceKH9dtD & https://t.co/KmNmbe9HJF while this too is highly relevant to the falsified concerns you raise https://t.co/o7LQPHLwVB again, you ignore that the sequences you complain about present no potential for harm.
@jeffrsebo https://t.co/tc3qu8NbNo
遺伝子組み換え食品が危険だと言う馬鹿な意見をしてくる奴がいたので今日一生懸命論文を探しました https://t.co/JkpI5BTp2M… https://t.co/Ya11O3ENpk… https://t.co/C31ChSTdX0 https://t.co/6FjvQcS44V これ以上いい加減なことを言うんだったら科学者も訴訟した方がいい
@RANNNLIVE Et c'était en 2013 : https://t.co/8kxRY1vtRu A un moment rendez vous à l'évidence. Vous faites du cherry picking quand tout indique que vous vous trompez
@esulle46 @richiembunda @sbrnnafisa @MVIWATA @esulle46 the long answer to your question is answered here: https://t.co/Wi5nV2mbge https://t.co/eBmRAtZ1TW
To further address your comment @sbrnnafisa the detection of gm gene in humans is not a health concern for all of the reasons mentioned here: https://t.co/Wi5nV24AoG https://t.co/hMij2juBmO https://t.co/AfwaGDWOUE
@kheyvaert79 @conner_rousseau Nochtans is er wel degelijk een consensus bij wetenschappers over de veiligheid van GGO's. Bijvoorbeeld Nicolia (2013) deed een metastudie genaamd "An overview of the last 10 years of genetically engineered crop safety research" met de volgende conclusie. https://t.co/H5mfAIcDh1
RT @prometheusgreen: @karl_haynes @NOtoGMOs @robles_jdaniel @PetitionE311 @LMcLachlan60 @30ASeawitch @railaerauoy @sense_strand @alain_co @…
RT @prometheusgreen: @karl_haynes @NOtoGMOs @robles_jdaniel @PetitionE311 @LMcLachlan60 @30ASeawitch @railaerauoy @sense_strand @alain_co @…
@karl_haynes @NOtoGMOs @robles_jdaniel @PetitionE311 @LMcLachlan60 @30ASeawitch @railaerauoy @sense_strand @alain_co @nick_saik @Resourceful1942 @SKweedgeek @JodiKoberinski @trevorcharles @stuartsmyth66 @jp_miner @DavidKucher @DrLizaMD @Sacredwatercamp @Monsantobuster @AlainPannetier @Flwrgirl66x @scarletjustice9 @AdaptableFarmer @BiotecBolivia @Nathan_Donley @GMOFreeUSA @BrianHMathison @Johnthomp55 @bob_calder @DrKristieLeong @RSaik @reddick_louis @GovCanHealth @equiterre @FDAfood @GMWatch @VICE @vicenews @BillMahrer @RobertLustigMD @DrZachBush @DrOz @DrChutkan @LeeCamp @KK_NicoDaVinci @baumhedlund @RobertKennedyJr @kavn @urso2017 The literature is abundant and spans decades. Start with https://t.co/o7LQPHtVx1 & https://t.co/wacO7PG0rI and here https://t.co/mOZCPlRnEH
@Buddy36560142 @RushhourP @caerbannog666 @bendynaa @redforged42 @Michael_D_Crow @Zerilos @peikko763 @sueytonius @brandonrgates @JaggerMickOZ @jamieswilson @dedkobrez @wildweatherdan @GaryMullennix @Tangomitteckel @FraserMacLeod5 @JPolov @bjjuhl58 @StormSignalSA @Blind_Populous @Pandeism @swcrisis @ClimateCatastr1 @climatefrauds @Gladfly1 @PMS280153 @Canberroo @vincent_philion @1_TMF_ @PolAnimalAus @tjtjgeol @vanvlietdesign @Tokyo_Tom @GillesnFio @WallaceWestland @Wild_Willdy @BradSchrag @NikolovScience @geoffmprice @Camburnclimate @mccaffreydanie1 @LeeWheelbarger @TannedBeach @craigthomler @EthonRaptor @RogTallbloke @Ike_Kiefer @Ceist8 Re: "Did u" U don't get to move the goal-posts anymore, denialist. Did the video I cited referenced consensus? If so, state the time in the video it does that? https://t.co/ZKKGsj4I4A Does evidence-based scientific consensus occur in science? https://t.
Et alors, quelle est la mauvaise nouvelle ? On rappellera que le consensus scientifique est loin de médire des OGM => https://t.co/7XO5Z4XWhS https://t.co/RzDK3j49eH
@fr_ajena Sinon "The scientific research conducted so far has not detected any significant hazards directly connected with the use of GE crops; however, the debate is still intense." https://t.co/FI6yoMF4BN
@LigueAB @roscoe867JN @greenpeacefr vont dans le sens de ce que vous voulez prouver a priori) ! Pour une revue exhaustive je vous conseille plutôt https://t.co/y5AFGqZ9Jf
@PHC_PiusFloris Link naar studies veiligheid: https://t.co/WQXdk9qdBB
@ReOpen911_info Pourtant il semblerait qu'il y ai convenus scientifique. https://t.co/S5d19jUQVI Nous sommes face à 300 scientifique (votre source) en contradiction avec la majorité. Voici une méta-analyse provenant d'une autre source. https://t.co/HNYoClSWnH
@JSegor @wsscherk @realdeepdives @ScottAdamsSays @geoffmprice @luvkit Re: "move right on to GMOs" Some useful places to start: https://t.co/s4gQ4Kcjwx https://t.co/R47GyposPs https://t.co/oe37f2KrBN https://t.co/o1spiTLDrU https://t.co/rDk6L02f4t https://t.co/fJr0Q1tRIN https://t.co/FES9txgTgH https://t.co/Btzrze0mOF https://t.co/qEZQhFHHax
@Jnn381 There are a LOT of independent studies actually. GENERA is a great resource https://t.co/l1f3Ftw2uQ Here's 1783 studies https://t.co/fiXUVIUVcQ Here's a decade's worth of research out of the EU https://t.co/p9Is86Fhi1