J Appl Behav Anal May 2014 PMID 24114226

Effects of two variations of differential reinforcement on prompt dependency.

Catia Cividini-Motta, William H Ahearn

Download social card

Mentions

3
Peak: 3 in Jul 2020
across 2 sources since Jul 2020

Extended reach

3,271
potential audience

Total likes

6

Video views

1,869

Mentions per month

Jul 2020 – Mar 2022

Where it's discussed

  • YouTube2 videos
  • X / Twitter1 posts

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The recognition of this thesis as a well-executed study, exemplified by comments like 'she really nailed this one,' indicates a positive but not highly detailed engagement with the research. The tone is appreciative, emphasizing quality but not exploring broader implications, which supports a moderate agreement and interest score while reflecting limited deep engagement or perceived high impact.

AgreementModerate agreement

Most discussions recognize the quality of the research, with praise like 'she really nailed this one,' indicating agreement with its value.

InterestModerate interest

The discussions show moderate interest, as participants acknowledge the study and its methods without deep analysis or critique.

EngagementModerate engagement

Responses are supportive but somewhat surface-level, with limited elaboration beyond affirming the work was well done.

ImpactNeutral impact

The conversation suggests the publication is appreciated but not considered groundbreaking or highly transformative in the field.

Abstract in brief

  • The study explored how two different types of differential reinforcement (DR) can reduce prompt dependency and help individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) learn new skills, by testing these methods on four participants and identifying their preferred rewards.
  • Three teaching procedures—one involving reinforcement for independent responses, one with reinforcement for prompted responses, and one with no reinforcement—were used to teach word-picture relations, with the most preferred rewards delivered in each.
  • Results showed that the DR high/moderate reinforcement method was most effective for three participants, while the DR high/extinction method worked best for the remaining individual, highlighting different effective strategies for reducing prompt dependency.]

Top posts

Most liked on X and Bluesky
bahearn12
@bahearn121 · X

@LiliaDarkStar @AZ_LIBTARD Certainly. This was Catia Cividini-Motta's Master's thesis. She really nailed this one: Effects of two variations of differential reinforcement on prompt dependency https://t.co/1vrXE845qs

Mar 6, 2022 · 1,402 followers View post →

All mentions

bahearn12
@bahearn121 · X

@LiliaDarkStar @AZ_LIBTARD Certainly. This was Catia Cividini-Motta's Master's thesis. She really nailed this one: Effects of two variations of differential reinforcement on prompt dependency https://t.co/1vrXE845qs

Mar 6, 2022 · 1,402 followers View post →