Testing the efficacy of homemade masks: would they protect in an influenza pandemic?
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
Mar 2020 – Nov 2025Where it's discussed
-
News491 articles
-
X / Twitter269 posts
-
Blogs42 articles
-
Facebook23 posts
-
Reddit8 posts
-
YouTube2 videos
-
Bluesky1 posts
AI synopsis
What people are saying
The discussions are characterized by references to detailed scientific studies from 2013, such as the work of Davies et al., which found homemade masks to be a last resort but better than nothing. The tone is analytical, emphasizing test results and filtration efficiencies, with participants citing words like 'effectiveness' and 'protection,' which highlight their focus on evidence-based evaluation, leading to a generally supportive but nuanced view of homemade masks' role in pandemic safety.
Most discussions acknowledge that homemade masks can provide some level of protection, referencing studies from as early as 2013 and emphasizing that they are better than nothing, though not as effective as surgical masks.
These discussions demonstrate high curiosity about scientific evidence, with many citing specific studies and discussing mask materials and efficacy in detail.
Participants actively analyze and compare research findings, sharing examples of scientific studies, debating effectiveness, and addressing misinformation, showing a moderate depth of interaction.
The debates reflect a recognition that mask efficacy influences health recommendations, with some stressing the importance of scientific evidence in policy decisions, indicating a modest influence on perceptions.
Top posts
Most liked on X and Bluesky@takavet1 ちなみに、私が「マスクからエアロゾル」の件で参考にしているのは、以下のような論文です。 @hichachu : 1. https://t.co/vUq5MRRWh3 2. https://t.co/ddvuNzt5TJ 3. https://t.co/Yz1iEeQUa9 4. https://t.co/bWEbitp41Z 5. https://t.co/oi1er1TwrO
@mojochessmaster @alt_kia broadly agree. there are two things I want to add. first is that masks working or not is not a binary, but more of a spectrum. this study from 2013 (https://t.co/zPupVHq65A) concludes that even -homemade masks- are better than not using one during an epidemic. second is that…
@CMichaelGibson Nothing... Both surg and homemade mask reduced total number of organism Blocks microbial aerosol challenge. Surg mask had the hugest filtration efficacy. BTW, MS2 size is 23 nm vs SARS COV2 is 50-200 nm. DOI: 10.1017/dmp.2013.43 https://t.co/NINpG34eBf
25. https://t.co/4HsDgTydzU 26. https://t.co/5Iqk1271ts 27. https://t.co/R94Jhy1Dz2 28. https://t.co/LKbNo7kt2m 29. https://t.co/7pSAnqKNWA 30. https://t.co/EUq4RwEyJ2 Et aussi, cette étude titrée, Santé mentale et bien-être des enfants et..
@tempe_dad @aginnt How about the one where instead of theorising they actually measured how much viral and bacterial particles are blocked by a mask, both factory-made and a homemade one? https://t.co/aizO0KVW9h
All mentions
Understanding Mask Effects on Oxygen Levels and Pathogen Spread
With the rise of mask mandates, concerns about reduced oxygen intake have emerged. This video explores if masks can cause hypoxia and highlights research on oral fluid droplets generated during speech, shedding light on…
Proper Mask Usage Guidelines During COVID-19 Pandemic
This video describes how to use masks correctly during the COVID-19 pandemic, including recommendations from WHO and CDC. It highlights the risks associated with cloth masks compared to medical masks, emphasizing the…
Homemade/Cloth Mask Simulation | Do Masks Actually Work Against Coronavirus?
@genZmommy @RedViking82 @DisgracedProp Too bad they ran an actual test on how well the masks work for that back in 2013 already and well well well https://t.co/S6kFdfpBx7 https://t.co/ES8gCMSDct
@deo_mister @MichelleLA1981 28. https://t.co/DAUweTmcDQ 29. https://t.co/v2OaZNR4k8 30. https://t.co/BRbCHvqC8r
@SebF344235 @AlainPatenaude7 Davies, A., et al. (2013).Testing the efficacy of homemade masks: would they protect in an influenza pandemic? Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness. Household materials found homemade masks block some particles but perform worse than surgical masks;better than no mask
@leowatchescode @CifarettoStan @LinkofSunshine Scientific journals mostly. It was a contentious topic with a lot of variables (types of masks, how people wore them, handling, etc) and high prevelance in Asia so it was a topic ripe for discussion. Results were usually inconclusive. https://t.co/2PoEjqDv6Z
@Nancy_9070 Van SARS en MERS wist men dat het airborne was. En wat mondmaskers betreft is ook al heel lang aangetoond dat ze werken, bv. https://t.co/gQl0SpraFJ
@AlecMacGillis Testing the Efficacy of Homemade Masks: Would They Protect in an Influenza Pandemic? homemade as last resort, surgical mask good. https://t.co/kowBU5jckv
@Derek_a_Franks @COVIDSelect When you search articles prior to 2020 they're whistling a different tune: 'As a result, we would not recommend the use of homemade face masks as a method of reducing transmission of infection from aerosols.' https://t.co/JQt8LcohNE
@justadrifter31 @TogetherWeMask @BaileyDevine20 @MsJulieSLam @DrJudyStone @michael_hoerger @TheWHN @CovidActionGSO @Pan_End_It 29. https://t.co/HDFt4Dqk2R 30. https://t.co/vrhos5BlYB
@tocquevilleboy @EricArchambaul7 26. https://t.co/RMsQBbUghr 27. https://t.co/d8OL5mlg0g 28. https://t.co/DAUweTlEOi 29. https://t.co/v2OaZNQwuA 30. https://t.co/BRbCHvq4iT Et aussi, cette étude titrée, Santé mentale et bien-être des enfants et des adolescents pendant la "pandémie" ⬇️ https://t.co/itWBLJQVpz
@hisandherpeas @HeyNurseKat https://t.co/hMq5QnHgf9 cool. Here is one from 2013. Use Google Scholar and put in pre Covid dates. Tons of data.
RT @DRTomlinsonEP:
RT @DRTomlinsonEP:
RT @DRTomlinsonEP:
RT @DRTomlinsonEP:
RT @DRTomlinsonEP:
RT @DRTomlinsonEP:
RT @DRTomlinsonEP:
RT @DRTomlinsonEP:
RT @DRTomlinsonEP:
RT @DRTomlinsonEP:
RT @DRTomlinsonEP:
RT @DRTomlinsonEP:
RT @DRTomlinsonEP:
RT @DRTomlinsonEP:
RT @DRTomlinsonEP:
@Mitch___Lowe @eelnine @KathrynPaisner @DaSkrubKing Here's a study from 2013 that most seem to have ignored. https://t.co/S6kFdfp3Hz https://t.co/OtDGAzJK08
@FlaGirlInThePNW @BradSCPat @KING5Seattle 27. https://t.co/WJf8ZXqgAd 28. https://t.co/VRIKDxX3G2 29. https://t.co/Z3024YyIQZ 30. https://t.co/YPEIEKmPPc
@14Josegar @frantastikko @GeoingenieriaMu @FisionB @cromatic7 @20m https://t.co/h4hmFzIw6q
@jatwolf @Arkypatriot @badlibtakes https://t.co/uoDTAIpOSn
@lazlo1206 @claytoonz @KanekoaTheGreat @MarcoPolo501c3 https://t.co/Eu6LRoYWPb https://t.co/3hqcNpECqk https://t.co/cqweYwuTlN https://t.co/wSj7zhvbex https://t.co/xHKrvmfof0 https://t.co/yp9FiIQalY I mean, how many studies do you want? Also, the third one is an analysis of 21 other studies as well.
@RadCentrism scientific method: "we know that masks work, we measured it" scholasticism: "I don't understand how masks could work therefore they surely cannot regardless of what evidence you try to throw at me" https://t.co/S6kFdfp3Hz
@plinko_chip @jordanbpeterson Study from 2013 Surgical mask blocks 95% of bacteria and 90% of virus particles Even just a scarf or a shirt blocks 50% That's enough to drastically decrease random transmission in public spaces https://t.co/S6kFdfpBx7 https://t.co/jzspdQ7FBF
(33/170) transmission from infected individuals” so why has the government suggested you make your own when they are not effective? Study article: https://t.co/o0I5CZYDnM
(32/170) 15. Testing the efficacy of homemade masks: would they protect in an influenza pandemic? “Our findings suggest that a homemade mask should only be considered as a last resort to prevent droplet
@oneman0rchestra @cornicelliny @Beulah52 @joncoopertweets N95s and blue light may have curbed the spread had they been utilized however surgical and homemade masks won’t stop respiratory viral spread. Fauci knew. https://t.co/mgDlrt6rwt
RT @BobbiSm21180790: @DrEricDing https://t.co/2Dz4tct6wI
@DrEricDing https://t.co/2Dz4tct6wI
@DeBunKerEtoiles as a last resort to prevent droplet transmission from infected individuals” so why have the government suggested you make your own when they are not effective ? Study article: https://t.co/AGcIV5vqrM
@DeBunKerEtoiles aborted fetal tissue, is much larger than the virus and still escaped the mask. Study article: https://t.co/iyU1yQMLKB 15. Testing the efficacy of homemade masks: would they protect in an influenza pandemic? “Our findings suggest that a homemade mask should only be considered
@JulienPain https://t.co/ZV49rMqpJm
24. https://t.co/u80dmwi6mM 25. https://t.co/EekUFhTWR4 26. https://t.co/1Vj3FkpsqP 27. https://t.co/MLScPKHvaj 28. https://t.co/uSH8n22Kee 29. https://t.co/OO14Fi0Yr2 30. https://t.co/TK20XK6SUq
@JrmeBrwnCt @YannLePentrec1 @chris220872 @myriampalomba Et... 30. https://t.co/kge4fPdxhg Et voila pourquoi #JeNePorteraiPlusLeMasque C'est assez sourcé pour vous ?
@lestbones1 @DavidWarschauer https://t.co/wSd65hEa3r
https://t.co/alpZZZ2v0O
@BFMTV 29. https://t.co/KkKNzmd1Ix 30. https://t.co/AI1PQ7X9Yl
RT @TheKeeper46: 25. https://t.co/4HsDgTydzU 26. https://t.co/5Iqk1271ts 27. https://t.co/R94Jhy1Dz2 28. https://t.co/LKbNo7kt2m 29. ht…
25. https://t.co/4HsDgTydzU 26. https://t.co/5Iqk1271ts 27. https://t.co/R94Jhy1Dz2 28. https://t.co/LKbNo7kt2m 29. https://t.co/7pSAnqKNWA 30. https://t.co/EUq4RwEyJ2 Et aussi, cette étude titrée, Santé mentale et bien-être des enfants et..
@IamThat19678729 @Gurrzy4 @tjkamp1 @Pat1029381 https://t.co/t1FGid9iRc
@HenryMullen500 @Tufoniti1 @JoveMarie2 @P_HerbMichaels 26. https://t.co/XwHemenAcJ 27. https://t.co/OLQIcYuhOD 28. https://t.co/agPzoD8nmU 29. https://t.co/Lyiu6bCyvj 30. https://t.co/1Xt5B3T1Ub
@oregon_mom_ 2013: https://t.co/cimb8nCC8Z https://t.co/dpTbGcKslY
@Savage_Brewer @dgonz0916 @JoeBrunoWSOC9 Hmmm this one
@JayJamieson15 @DrCanuckMD https://t.co/VhIvquilvC
@Dorotheacalm @CristinaMallai @SKGandhiMD @mattprescott 69. Testing the efficacy of homemade masks: would they protect in an influenza pandemic? “Our findings suggest that a homemade mask should only be considered as a last resort https://t.co/0oCfUDJaIC
@RobinHoorelbeke Zie bacteriophage MS2. grootte = 27nm. Grootte coronavirus = 50-140nm. En: virussen zitten in aerosolen, die nog een pak groter zijn. Welke gaten?? https://t.co/gQl0SpraFJ https://t.co/5vBN7NQwPb
@ChuckWurster 24. https://t.co/Rdbo1HsyQs 25. https://t.co/iKO9gu288m 26. https://t.co/XwHemenAcJ 27. https://t.co/OLQIcYuhOD 28. https://t.co/agPzoD8nmU 29. https://t.co/Lyiu6bCyvj 30. https://t.co/1Xt5B3T1Ub
@srhdrnkwtr @ABC https://t.co/g2SvNEvmzC
@Hiswillbedone05 @uw_mod @_lava_b @coniinthegarden @thrasherxy Here is a study from 2013 showing how homemade cloth “masks significantly reduced the number of microorganisms expelled by volunteers”. Peer reviewed and published by Cambridge. https://t.co/gpAUN0iz9g
@LanktheDank @schtickschtuv @seeingclearlya1 @jared_ouimette @ChrisPatterDu @DJUSA00 https://t.co/g2SvNEvmzC
@BrentJeffcoat https://t.co/sV0o4MFHKb https://t.co/GaVvh4qk2B
@WolperEW @COVID_isnotover @hburkitt No offense it is a nice thought but this would be completely pointless and cloth masks are mire harmful than helpful https://t.co/wSd65hmzbT
@third_eldest @petitcassee inb4 "b-but viruses are smaller than mask fabric!" https://t.co/S6kFdfp3Hz
@myrabatchelder Masks at best are a psychological comfort blanket for those frozen with FEAR. 29. https://t.co/Lyiu6bC0FL 30. https://t.co/1Xt5B3Su4D
@rencar130 @JoveMarie2 @speed1lite @1wishgenie1 @myrabatchelder 26. https://t.co/XwHemen2nb 27. https://t.co/OLQIcYtJZ5 28. https://t.co/agPzoD7Pxm 29. https://t.co/Lyiu6bC0FL 30. https://t.co/1Xt5B3Su4D
@danielgoyal 23. https://t.co/qJS3oWYtCx 24. https://t.co/Rdbo1Hs10U 25. https://t.co/iKO9gu1AiO 26. https://t.co/XwHemen2nb 27. https://t.co/OLQIcYtJZ5 28. https://t.co/agPzoD7Pxm 29. https://t.co/Lyiu6bC0FL 30. https://t.co/1Xt5B3Su4D
@JohnSet49773199 @Adam_Creighton Easy: your image is misinformation Standard disposable surgical masks, and even homemade cotton masks have demonstrated some filtration ability as low as a 1 micron See table 4: https://t.co/4FajMRWF22 https://t.co/uMQPY8AXwU
@FranB____ @Adri_More_3 @Futbolomuerte @mianrey Our findings suggest that a homemade mask should only be considered as a last resort to prevent droplet transmission from infected individuals, but it would be better than no protection. https://t.co/7my32uv6VF
@df74f678ef4e4a5 @JustAGirl_zero @ksorbs That's not true. Standard surgical masks, and even homemade cotton masks have demonstrated they filter as low as a few microns Source: https://t.co/GnlP6NNsfb https://t.co/gTpu1Pm4NG
@Roberto86897681 @Alfredo_Bruno @PatriciaRSifpom 26. https://t.co/hgkcU9UHe7 27. https://t.co/C2DSY3BIhx 28. https://t.co/VjHvB9UkvC 29. https://t.co/j9GHbBRAQK 30. https://t.co/GQ5cdSKkPm
@Fifon58578686 @Ada26403560 @docent_ws @PiotrWitczak_ @KonradPiasecki https://t.co/wsOdiQyIq3 https://t.co/YuS6VUcvc2 https://t.co/rYY9sAqN1P https://t.co/gQo44nH0NK https://t.co/3QMV2nTd66 https://t.co/6ayv4idbJs https://t.co/dZku4QBWgH
25. https://t.co/caTFcxH0KC 26. https://t.co/oAB6gm5Wim 27. https://t.co/xLMPOwBmCx 28. https://t.co/qTpKtRJ6GZ 29. https://t.co/h28uj4Kcjh 30. https://t.co/Exc0kNnfld
@chris_sandor There appears to be a sliding scale of effectiveness, rather than some simple binary. https://t.co/AVO649w14u
@Zigmanfreud https://t.co/rkiI6J5hZl
@jeff_hink Davies, A., Thompson, K. A., Giri, K., Kafatos, G., Walker, J., & Bennett, A. (2013). Testing the efficacy of homemade masks: would they protect in an influenza pandemic?. Disaster medicine and public health preparedness, 7(4), 413-418.
27. https://t.co/7pF9X1qUIj 28. https://t.co/arZTxlZRpy 29. https://t.co/77OdILsZw8 30. https://t.co/DoEpI9BGyl https://t.co/Ydfu87aC0G
@JoeBiden “As a result, we would not recommend the use of homemade face masks as a method of reducing transmission of infection from aerosols.” https://t.co/cMwrhqTmBE
@trixie0711 @maasje70 @GerikeRitsema @JohnArts15 @PO_Raad @DennisWiersma @attjekuiken @Lisawesterveld @MarionKoopmans @AVIPNL @MarcBonten Al vele decennia aan wetenschappelijk bewijs. Bijvoorbeeld dit onderzoek uit 2013 (pre-COVID): https://t.co/ojs1QgsjVy
@oneUnusualCat @AndrewLazarus4 @ianfmusgrave @BlueLionBlog @immunotoxPhD @LauraDekker1 @BeckyJohnson222 @krebiozen @DreadPirRob42 @kfunk937 @jkellyca @JaneEOpie @LombardiBrett @StopVaxxedLies @SimonGr41594862 @LifeDorr @M___N___O @JakeEschen @eTweeetz @Juanita87722370 @David_5705 @MacBaird13 @seemomster @doritmi @_mamadeb @WendyOrent @fiski70 @AntivaxNi66a @EdDarrell @SkepticalASDMom @badzoot7 @Monstercoyliar @MyxaZZ @TakeThatCDC @LenGrunstein @SmilesbyPayet @lawnatural @MarkSchirmer4 @Awithonelison @Sheldon_Walker_ @jp_miner @mcfunny @TThoughtmonger @Boxmenot @MAhealthforkids @TioChango_ @Rosewind2007 @saluce65 @kuriousmind93 They do work on flu and COVID. There is no inconsistency, we just have much, much more data for COVID. https://t.co/YsNk12S4VX https://t.co/PH6WbOXmOB https://t.co/ElrsovCjGh
@GekkeMa66038212 @lfcthijs @LavieJanRoos https://t.co/e18gHUFzVE https://t.co/C2tcLgNQ0n https://t.co/xCmdYcELWG Voor als je over FFP2 gaat piepen: https://t.co/jMrB1vuEu6 https://t.co/lwN1TOZD2b https://t.co/adNxDIaxUm https://t.co/pkCViw5R18 https://t.co/dVC5PjhHE3 https://t.co/RI8zGld3w2 Succes met lezen.
@rockdriguin @BuenosModalez @fernandeznorona La conversación debe ser de naturaleza científica. Por lo tanto, debe centrarse más en los artículos científicos que en si fueron compartidos por un sitio de derecha o de izquierda Algunos de los artículos científicos que comparte https://t.co/vJGUJTCLxP https://t.co/q0PGkGNIh7
@DarienSWilson https://t.co/hzzuFcsux9 https://t.co/lCJl8P47ko https://t.co/l0b1IO2Vai https://t.co/3WzHDjPYnM https://t.co/q9APsoUSZS
@DuendeenF @POTUS https://t.co/v5cakxVoIj
@DinkMcdougal @Steelcryo @stephharmon Link for your “remote intelligence” to peruse but I’m sticking you on mute because nah mate I’ve seen your feed and it’s all kinds of angry and I cannot be fucked with that https://t.co/GEbpfYnTfU
@chrisgoona @DonatoBardi @SimonJonesNews 25. https://t.co/iKO9gu1AiO 26. https://t.co/XwHemen2nb 27. https://t.co/OLQIcYtJZ5 28. https://t.co/agPzoD7Pxm 29. https://t.co/Lyiu6bC0FL 30. https://t.co/1Xt5B3Su4D
22. https://t.co/vjfYZN7X15 23. https://t.co/FP6VRMfbza 24. https://t.co/6rS7wabxLP 25. https://t.co/D4SHKlbaqQ 26. https://t.co/ZbhPYKt3EL 27. https://t.co/mQh3XYe2gW 28. https://t.co/jZ0srdtbLV 29. https://t.co/gAGUnQXTE0 30. https://t.co/Tp6fcYMqR3
@garthurs64 @JoeBiden https://t.co/bA1Lopusw7 read the whole study then think again about the safety behind your mask.
@LalorDarren @Niall_Boylan You are choosing to be ignorant 28. https://t.co/Qfa76Iro74 29. https://t.co/jK8igVJfiC 30. https://t.co/4qn1gCk6y4
@JuliaHB1 @dgurdasani1 and lastly…26. https://t.co/XwHemen2nb 27. https://t.co/OLQIcYtJZ5 28. https://t.co/agPzoD7Pxm 29. https://t.co/Lyiu6bC0FL 30. https://t.co/1Xt5B3Su4D
@FingersLily @Mollie_Whuppie @sara_endipidy @Debbiekean2 @northerness 28. https://t.co/agPzoD7Pxm 29. https://t.co/Lyiu6bC0FL 30. https://t.co/1Xt5B3Su4D
@mykamead79 @VinceINFJ @CPita3 @jljcolorado @AntibioticDoc @McDevonMD @rivm @ECDC_EU Testing the Efficacy of Homemade Masks: Would They Protect in an Influenza Pandemic? Anna Davies, Katy-Anne Thompson, Karthika Giri, George Kafatos, Jimmy Walker, and Allan Bennett, Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2013 Aug; 7(4): 413–418. https://t.co/LI2eb5sUno
@mitchinam @TeresaGranger4 @AJKayWriter @AmericanAir False. The science does show that masks (of almost any type) do have an effect. https://t.co/PH6WbOXmOB https://t.co/YsNk12S4VX
@emerald3122 @LoraThomasCO https://t.co/NmMoYo6Chw https://t.co/2Fgk46I8Di https://t.co/EjM7fU5ML0 https://t.co/hzzuFcsux9 https://t.co/lCJl8P47ko https://t.co/l0b1IO2Vai https://t.co/3WzHDjPYnM https://t.co/q9APsoUSZS
@mr_tilde16 @MothrOfDrag0ns @aronhicks6 @HeyKimmerz @BigBird @EricaRHill “Our findings suggest that a homemade mask should only be considered as a last resort to prevent droplet transmission from infected individuals” So why has the government suggested you make your own when they are not effective? https://t.co/QVUk5n8uZK
@RuyDiazB1976 @ElCbreezy @politicalmath There was an older study that did this, but with real humans wearing masks & a generic virus and bacterium that can be spread by aerosol used https://t.co/aizO0KVW9h https://t.co/Ht9kSPQ700
@Kciroj_NL @theepot80 @hetuuudje2 “Our findings suggest that a homemade mask should only be considered as a last resort to prevent droplet transmission from infected individuals, but it would be better than no protection.” https://t.co/bcn7oPFzGP
@JENNIFERKBENED1 @masonlemarquis @M_Millerman There was a study done PRIOR to this pandemic that showed viruses that DO linger in aerosol are STILL very effectively filtered by surgical masks, and fairly well filtered even by a homemade cotton mask: https://t.co/aizO0KVW9h https://t.co/SiE7FpkaXx
30. https://t.co/Gq7izAQRrs
22. https://t.co/MrUmAqhJj7 23. https://t.co/NfuBGtez6s 24. https://t.co/ZQILILHSmQ 25. https://t.co/eufGVUY7jS 26. https://t.co/AkZ2ksY6Ov 27. https://t.co/MzZIsTYyPu 28. https://t.co/fYD4iqg3qk 29. https://t.co/fDaMmw8Blx 30. https://t.co/Gq7izAQRrs
@iain_bloomfield @Hestergardner02 @BBCRosAtkins We know Masks are Useless and Harmful 27. https://t.co/1EmYIhW3yD 28. https://t.co/HteL9EGUVa 29. https://t.co/PsBKxPYYm2 30. https://t.co/Sq9PQ4vdQQ
@sritchie57 @JackOzNYC @1stImpeached2X @Luke_Mosiman https://t.co/NXHt1AL6To
@ItsTeamGoodGuy1 @Elizabe99819964 @LoraThomasCO @dcsdk12 https://t.co/l0b1IO2Vai https://t.co/3WzHDjPYnM https://t.co/q9APsoUSZS https://t.co/FLQS8oUlSS https://t.co/oPDIJZh7vl https://t.co/T701u1Zqkm
@TheRealKoolair @ChristianZach18 @stephen_miceli @mikeswriting @kylenabecker I can. https://t.co/aizO0KVW9h
@CanuckCute @ChristianZach18 @stephen_miceli @mikeswriting @kylenabecker Try 90-95% for surgical masks (from an actual study that measured this directly.) https://t.co/aizO0KVW9h https://t.co/Lf3xGgw6Il
@ChristianZach18 @stephen_miceli @mikeswriting @kylenabecker Yep... and there was this study from 2013 which measured how much they actually reduce it, on a generic virus and bacteria that can survive aerosolisation. tl;dr it works https://t.co/aizO0KVW9h
@ShowsWill @__Really__ @MapleSyru_p @LoraThomasCO @dcsdk12 https://t.co/EjM7fU5ML0 https://t.co/hzzuFcsux9 https://t.co/lCJl8P47ko https://t.co/l0b1IO2Vai https://t.co/3WzHDjPYnM https://t.co/q9APsoUSZS https://t.co/FLQS8oUlSS https://t.co/oPDIJZh7vl https://t.co/T701u1Zqkm
@ChopsofGiz @gorillajim @KimMari15039764 @Mariart44 29. https://t.co/dbDGiouokV 30. https://t.co/dC4ayCg9py
@Erika_Borkoles @KeithCullen9 @Dom_Perrottet @TanyaDaviesMP Masks don’t work, particularly in kids who don’t use them properly. They at best do nothing and at worst cause harm to the wearer. Here is some sciency stuff to read… https://t.co/m0Zx8bWyJa https://t.co/iQljUVCbPD https://t.co/YUBzc9xPM0 https://t.co/8muxj4nOji
@kathyredmond @stephmb75 @TCHDHealth https://t.co/hzzuFcsux9 https://t.co/lCJl8P47ko https://t.co/l0b1IO2Vai https://t.co/3WzHDjPYnM https://t.co/q9APsoUSZS https://t.co/FLQS8oUlSS https://t.co/oPDIJZh7vl https://t.co/T701u1Zqkm https://t.co/NOyrCh8RuK https://t.co/4TTqnIy1MK
@AblemanAdam @Brotegos @TimothenaF @farronbalanced https://t.co/dnZAGHuTWW Wanna know how I know you've done zero research on the efficacy of wearing masks and virus transmission...
@SharylAttkisson Agree. https://t.co/vhPj8ETNDa, https://t.co/3cL4QXafee, https://t.co/jiAZK0HB2e
@DavidShirres @RSSB_rail ....we have estimated that the typical mask wearing rail passenger has a: • 30% reduction in inhaled virus • 50% reduction in exhaled virus BUT values vary widely depending on mask quality and fit (Davies et al 2013 https://t.co/L4wqvrlesD
@Jorisa84037033 @ContainmentNu @volkskrant Ok, pre-COVID is er aardig wat onderzoek naar geïmproviseerde maskers gedaan. Zowel fysisch als klinisch kon er effect worden gemeten. Zie bijvoorbeeld https://t.co/ojs1QgsjVy
@bridgietherease meh. any review that doesn't include https://t.co/aizO0KVW9h is a poor review.
@factseekers1 @aginnt Have you found this one? https://t.co/aizO0KVW9h
@tempe_dad @aginnt How about the one where instead of theorising they actually measured how much viral and bacterial particles are blocked by a mask, both factory-made and a homemade one? https://t.co/aizO0KVW9h
@RickLangel @SarahforIowa @BruiserK @IAPublicHealth @IADeptofEd @IAGovernor @WDMCS @TexHellCat This one even concludes that cloth masks are better than nothing! https://t.co/RKcnfWHB1r
@Jerny16 @matteo_1213 @TheDCCowboy1 @MattWalshBlog From 2013. Conclusion, "Our findings suggest that a homemade mask should only be considered as a last resort to prevent droplet transmission from infected individuals, but it would be better than no protection." Basically it doesn't work,but do it anyway https://t.co/4JRAUr2FhR
RT @__ice9: @Merz @macroliter @Reuters Doing it right means doing a literature review... https://t.co/qoIWPCbGMk https://t.co/kWWlomPnUd…
@Chuck58330448 @britlemen @MW_Royers Scientifically masks don’t help that much. https://t.co/Fd4j5yAA8Z
@uk_truthfairy @paulg Damn, I didn't know idiots are allowed to sit on SAGE. https://t.co/aizO0KVW9h
gobierno ha sugerido que te hagas la tuya si no son eficaces? Artículo del estudio: https://t.co/4Q3BYxhl7D Objetivo: Este estudio examinó las mascarillas caseras como alternativa a las mascarillas comerciales. Métodos: Se evaluó la capacidad de varios materiales caseros
@GeoHeraldo @eugyppius1 @TEDxHamster You can't seriously think that your mouth produces aerosolised virus particles? Btw, even improvised masks made out of T-shirts have been proven (in a realistic setting!) effective for virus particles: https://t.co/aizO0KVW9h
@MattWalshBlog And why should anyone? They are not effective. https://t.co/Lpb6x05b54 https://t.co/X5e13cTiyk https://t.co/yotzsF6NmE https://t.co/qCyT081Zu0 https://t.co/usO7nu1fke
@JumboShrimp787 Science. https://t.co/a8Rpx8ZSaL estimated a 50% filtration efficiency for homemade cloth masks. Based on this figure, the model I borrowed, https://t.co/wEynPqbxQv, uses a conservative 30% efficiency in reducing virus inhalation by a susceptible person. 1/2
@ronnie_ed @afowler06 They do very little in a flu pandemic, so a virus that is much smaller only FFP3 masks would make a negligible difference https://t.co/V6QHyrhbIJ
@Mohamed3on @apsmunro https://t.co/V6QHyrhbIJ
@NealMcTaggart @NeilClark66 @SianThomas7 https://t.co/V6QHyrhbIJ
@JamesMelville 2013 flu epidemic https://t.co/V6QHyrhbIJ
@JWStol @ThatRyanChap There was a study back in 2003 regarding a flu pandemic! Now remember that the particulates from Covid are much smaller than the flu! https://t.co/V6QHyrhbIJ
@Skeptopathy @MarchForScience https://t.co/OCvuh9tWie
@billcarlisle @txhighdudgeon @SteveDeaceShow Links or didn't happen. In the meantime, here are a few studies and reviews pointing to the efficacy of masks vs. influenza to peruse at your leisure. https://t.co/TzbiBOnUfc https://t.co/ygB923Gs1w https://t.co/efRlqb5xUT https://t.co/Pa5Nf5iWBN
@Andy27646517 @ianmSC https://t.co/3j0IVQu3pq https://t.co/lzBCLRlaA1
@Andy27646517 @ianmSC Well, they're not hard to find. https://t.co/vFwGSLLpuC
@muhalifhayvan25 @onrk1n @sputnik_TR @OnceSorgula 2013 https://t.co/5xaZFeszlT
@yb11333344 @pukblauw @emgoyaars @peter_porto Zoals bovenaan staat: https://t.co/f7NsO82DVp Anyhow: Kijk eens in pubmed van de NCBI (bijvoorbeeld: https://t.co/13lQTYpR9T) en zo zijn er nog tal van onderzoeken. Dus nogmaals: stellen dat het helemaal niets doet is onzin, stellen dat het veel te weinig doet -> juist.
@illuminars @markvanasten “Our findings suggest that a homemade mask should only be considered as a last resort to prevent droplet transmission from infected individuals, but it would be better than no protection.” https://t.co/bcn7oPnYif
@Benedict_ARNY https://t.co/iyr7bLNWQK
@Nusakan007 @eastwestgrl @TKCODY @andrewbostom Meanwhile, this. https://t.co/iyz6N3malo
@Doubldc There are lots of study that prove the opposite of what you said. Here's one after a 1 minute search. Of course, we're looking at pre-2019 studies. https://t.co/iyz6N3DLJY
@leibovgb @ShillingTony @Gray_Orca @panininef @amber_athey https://t.co/aizO0KVW9h https://t.co/JQRPDHFFZr
@2fronttweets @wokewithkels Uh, surgeons have been wearing masks for decades for the express purpose of reducing the chance of infection. But for some reason that is not enough proof, so here you go: https://t.co/4ad5uewKxb https://t.co/Q4HUPp5lds https://t.co/1sQdiyweYK https://t.co/UHIdXGbJk6
@Gray_Orca @panininef @amber_athey Turns out most of the particles spread in microdroplets (aerosol), that aren't, and that the virus can't survive suspended in air without that. https://t.co/aizO0KVW9h
@stefannaa Badanie skuteczności maseczek, nawet tych zrobionych w domu, wobec pandemii grypy. Ostrzeżenie: foliarzy może nie przekonać
@Darek70510651 @Maks88442079 @stefannaa Maks, łap badania o maseczkach (porównanie nawet tych zrobionych z domowych materiałów) https://t.co/jF1WKhSGDA
@TrishtheDish_7 @RonaldW26238259 @TheAbridgedZach @justinamash https://t.co/oNvR5tnjAP
@ramonfincken @mbootsman Ik lees veel in pubmed, deze is wel mooi: https://t.co/13lQTYpR9T De mooie conclusie: Het is een last resort oplossing, maar beter dan niets. Over medische mondkapjes is ook wel e.e.a. aan onderzoeken te vinden. Zelfs op Youtube iemand die ze getest heeft en resultaten laat zien
@LuisBobby3 @callthecorners @Lui_101499 @BNODesk There are loads of them. https://t.co/SIVJJiQUsS https://t.co/5cF7gdLNvI https://t.co/qK956A3AUe https://t.co/UHIdXGbJk6
@ektaka @joncardella @kaitlancollins NCBI Published Study: Testing the Efficacy of Homemade Masks: Would They Protect in an Influenza Pandemic? "As a result, we would not recommend the use of homemade face masks as a method of reducing transmission of infection from aerosols." Science! Who knew?
tldr -Homemade masks work, just not as well as surgical masks. "Both masks significantly reduced the number of microorganisms expelled by volunteers, although the surgical mask was 3 times more effective in blocking transmission than the homemade mask." https://t.co/NInzED8Bth
@mikezentz @Jenae04624904 @CDCgov https://t.co/BzUKp3XIES
@mikezentz @RickByr51019573 @CDCgov https://t.co/BzUKp3XIES
@mikezentz @lorisstuff123 @CDCgov https://t.co/BzUKp3XIES
@mikezentz @reichmmj12 @CDCgov https://t.co/BzUKp3XIES
@mikezentz @LadyCJ98080964 @CDCgov https://t.co/BzUKp3XIES
@mikezentz @CDCgov You do know that they have done efficacy tests on masks and various mask materials, layers, thicknesses. Several hundred over the past year. They work. https://t.co/BzUKp3XIES
According to researchers from PUBLIC HEALTH ENGLAND, published in DISASTER MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH PREPAREDENESS, the #mask filters #virus with size of #COVID-19, with an efficiency in filtering of 90%, is #polypropylene https://t.co/Ba1R7SvLhm
Según PUBLIC HEALTH ENGLAND, publicado en DISASTER MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH PREPAREDENESS, la mascarilla más efectiva para prevenir la transmisión de virus del tamaño del COVID-19, con eficiencia de 90%, es el polipropileno y debe cubrir nariz y boca. https://t.co/Ba1R7SvLhm
@evilweed5 @hnkdvrs @volkskrant “Our findings suggest that a homemade mask should only be considered as a last resort to prevent droplet transmission from infected individuals, but it would be better than no protection.” https://t.co/bcn7oPFzGP
@rlayton27 @ZeinerChris @fox13 https://t.co/83EV275gQv https://t.co/g7VgBPjCVG https://t.co/DYJxO9OiWN https://t.co/vLxjppnHwF (2013 study, not a new idea) https://t.co/HdAU8rPCTe https://t.co/skIn5oURrt Here are a few papers if you could give a rats ass about doing some basic research
@TrishtheSkeptic @ComradeDoom1 @Peter_Wehner @BillKristol I am sure it's pretty :D do you have a picture? BTW you could make a third decent homemade mask today! Published (not in Washington Post) but in medical journal: https://t.co/6tUT9axFwl
@FitFounder There is zero measurable benefit for non-medical people to wear them Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, Available on CJO 2013 doi:10.1017/dmp.2013.43 https://t.co/anB24jDYzY
@SuperCal35 @GamingGentleWan @waltercool11 @douchefuturist @nypost Complete and utter nonsense. First of all, the efficacy of a treatment will depend on the pathogen in question so why would we discount studies from 2020? Second of all, what you said is an utter lie anyways. Here's a study from 2013: https://t.co/X75cu2jjFB https://t.co/tkZkFPrZyC
@D_Jongman @Nakwaninibasi @hommel_b @avonturix @MarieLouiseLee1 @Wiep13396680 @Agnescmv @Linda47589127 @cyclingfan59 “Our findings suggest that a homemade mask should only be considered as a last resort to prevent droplet transmission from infected individuals, but it would be better than no protection.” https://t.co/bcn7oPFzGP
@hommel_b @Nakwaninibasi @avonturix @MarieLouiseLee1 @Wiep13396680 @Agnescmv @Linda47589127 @cyclingfan59 “Our findings suggest that a homemade mask should only be considered as a last resort to prevent droplet transmission from infected individuals, but it would be better than no protection.” https://t.co/bcn7oPFzGP
@BriemenV @turbomeisje @Wim04789402 Zelfs huisgemaakte mondkapjes werken al tegen de verspreiding van virussen. Niet 100%, maar het werkt wel. Dat blijkt uit wetenschappelijk onderzoek: https://t.co/bcn7oPFzGP
RT @chrismwc: @WINDOCTORRX Quite the contrary, they’re looking to get herd immunity without freaking out the masses and having a run on sup…
@WINDOCTORRX Quite the contrary, they’re looking to get herd immunity without freaking out the masses and having a run on supplies. Fauci knows they don’t work but yeah wear two
@VRC61 @cnnbrk Davies A, Thompson KA, Giri K, Kafatos G, Walker J, Bennett A. Testing the efficacy of homemade masks: would they protect in an influenza pandemic? Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2013 Aug;7(4):413-8. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2013.43. PMID: 24229526; PMCID: PMC7108646.
@northerness Davies A et al. 2013 Testing the efficacy of homemade masks: would they protect in an influenza pandemic?. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness (doi: 10.1017/dmp.2013.43). https://t.co/VcZZrymODG
@CoasterD_ @nypost https://t.co/2tEWXKHEEJ Even a cloth mask offers some protection against microbes/viruses transmitted by aerosols. We've known this for decades.
@jack_black_jack @TaylorSvehlak @3legphotography @HopesMom12 @DanRather This kind of science? https://t.co/5Aaimh97mf https://t.co/F9JwZrf0Xz https://t.co/ugUrfDBJis You will not see this, however, as I don't interact with those who can't remain civil during discussion.
@Alois7169 @FKevin1919 @CheeseburgerGe1 @cordelia321 @scrowder Therefore the article about the study is drawing false conclusion. Find a study that directly test the effectiveness of masks. Oh wait here is one. https://t.co/w0W68RSZ07
https://t.co/IR9kfdBfb3
@BluRadioCo Evidencia científica desde 2013 "Conclusion: Our findings suggest that a homemade mask should only be considered as a last resort to prevent droplet transmission from infected individuals, but it would be better than no protection." https://t.co/BKtrTM7Yvo
@CathyJuvinao @sicsuper Ese requerimiento se contesta en un dia: "Conclusion: Our findings suggest that a homemade mask should only be considered as a last resort to prevent droplet transmission from infected individuals, but it would be better than no protection." https://t.co/BKtrTM7Yvo
@Osc11418547 To go more into it cotton masks like mine have been considered to have around a 75% efficacy https://t.co/zlXJoIjeTX ranging from 70-90 based on how it was made.
@RobtimusPrime87 @Kat_Says_Stuff @paulrobins10 @PoochOTron @WendyM90054273 @LindaSk49118554 https://t.co/5m7MEkQwLU https://t.co/mclss5gq0Y
@nofishnofungus Here's a study of homemade masks. Result: median 50% as effective as surgical masks https://t.co/IC8DPzWVri I read another which said surgical masks are only fully effective for 30mins. Personally I only wear a mask for brief periods inside shops, and handle carefully after
@MarkReady47 Do you know the web site PubMed ? You can search all of them but here is one on cloth masks https://t.co/VI06ItrUKJ
@OlimpioQuadros @measkmeaskme3 @Ree_Lucci @marsilcos Acho que vou começar com um artigo que nem fala de covid. Só pra ver até onde vai sua crença. "Testing the efficacy of homemade masks: would they protect in an influenza pandemic? - PubMed" https://t.co/FMOgqFTjfd
@Team_ReaIity @systemanalysen @veit_markus @DrPuerner > "Vor Corona NUR Studien die keine Evidenz belegen dass Masken schützen." Ich glaube, wir haben unterschiedliche Definitionen von "NUR": https://t.co/P1nmoogts3 https://t.co/k6yeA71HbR https://t.co/zVF2ux6MVX
@Anika97035386 @heaven_nurse @NoDumbAlliance @OlafGersemann @Natascha_Strobl @welt Wer behauptet muss belegen. Damit du nicht dumm sterben musst: https://t.co/sCA9cWhEcw https://t.co/5AF2UsD5n3 https://t.co/c8vbVTZeGT https://t.co/2cDEDfkpVE https://t.co/UWzi4xryGK
@marleyHere41 @RosaLuxembruh @sakitakahaschi @RikeWaldfee hier die wissenschaft zum thema masken: 1. https://t.co/zYMPQ6PROY 2. https://t.co/TRyNpHAFUy 3. https://t.co/LqrksM3Suq 4. https://t.co/YNy7HqkoxI alles ziemlich eindeutig.
Даавуун маск Юуч зүүгээгүй бснаас дээр. Гэхдээ 3 давхар хийж өдөр бүр угааж бх шаардлагатай. Testing the Efficacy of Homemade Masks: Would They Protect in an Influenza Pandemic? | Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness | Cambridge Core https://t.co/tjAsfMhwY8
@VincentKoster3 @Ingrid57878695 @Jake33691721 @fradeealex https://t.co/6UabtOZL1D
@Acez20021 @Gaia_Universe @arja_brink @jokebronkhorst @AnnaBos16 Het onderzoek van Davies waarop de mondkapjesplicht is gebaseerd: As a result, we would not recommend the use of homemade face masks as a method of reducing transmission of infection from aerosols. https://t.co/1hWf2hyfyu
@ONealD2 @TheFrankmanMN @Photo59Smart @ThomasEWoods Other that the DenMask-19 study (not a test of source control, but of PP w/ non PPE) what's your 2nd study? You mentioned "Cambridge", but I suspect it wasn't this one: https://t.co/G8xSxoS8BD
Het onderzoek van Davies waarop de mondkapjesplicht is gebaseerd: As a result, we would not recommend the use of homemade face masks as a method of reducing transmission of infection from aerosols. https://t.co/1hWf2hyfyu https://t.co/piUE363gDy
@FightingBackPa @tinaswope2014 @PAHealthDept @SecretaryLevine Btw your original stupid statement said mask and not cloth mask. It's hard to find articles regarding cloth mask because we werent suppose to be in a dumb situation where surgical mask ran out. Here is one. Says the samething as every article in 2020 https://t.co/PKyjaWAjvz
@DriversAmerican @SanDiegoCounty @fox5sandiego Davies A, Thompson KA, Giri K, Kafatos G, Walker J, Bennett A. Testing the efficacy of homemade masks: would they protect in an influenza pandemic? Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2013;7(4):413-418.10.1017/dmp.2013.43. https://t.co/Nmv3QVVwQy external icon .
@LifeWithMatt_YT @elihuh2001 Maybe fourth study is the charm: https://t.co/D9EFY9kKn0
@mariannezw @AnneliesdeZeeuw https://t.co/6UabtOZL1D
@NutritionOverh1 @AnthonySabatini American Journal of Infection Control, Volume 34, Issue 2, March 2006, Pages 51-57. BMC Infect Dis 14, 480. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness https://t.co/rilM6DhDOK
@CatherineHeta @AnthonySabatini 2 out of 3 ain't bad. Your Score: 66%ish American Journal of Infection Control, Volume 34, Issue 2, March 2006, Pages 51-57. Also: Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, Available on CJO 2013 https://t.co/rilM6DhDOK
@VillaMad3 @BigStarBiz https://t.co/MI1AgFaMOn
@Stelmadesigns (see e.g. Davies A1, Thompson KA, Giri K, Kafatos G, Walker J, Bennett A. 2013 Testing the Efficacy of Homemade Masks: Would They Protect in an Influenza Pandemic? doi: 10.1017/dmp.2013.43.)
@MickMcDermott10 @mikeonthemarne @GeorgeMonbiot @CatyUpATree some of us do our homework, https://t.co/FK8X5zoGJ4 https://t.co/jbGcW62zoJ https://t.co/B3wZcSC8Nv https://t.co/jKWIu363dm https://t.co/TArQOpGwwS https://t.co/mVhEBAPnQR https://t.co/ILF5wONaDf https://t.co/27ZH6etg1L epidemiology/epidemic-theory https://t.co/t8BuQPi3Hf
@jdsbaskonista @achamiann @JBaldiu Éste: https://t.co/JxOfHhjAVh
@ADadsVoice @LuisLouie121999 @realDonaldTrump https://t.co/MFHGaPmry0
@the_ghost_hosts @nyjerrykane @sean_antrim @stillgray Davies A, Thompson KA, Giri K, Kafatos G, Walker J, Bennett A. Testing the efficacy of homemade masks: would they protect in an influenza pandemic? Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2013;7:413-8. 10.1017/dmp.2013.43
@bioZhena Davies, A. et al. (2013) “Testing the Efficacy of Homemade Masks: Would They Protect in an Influenza Pandemic?”, Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, Available on CJO 2013 doi:10.1017/dmp.2013.43 https://t.co/Qtbol4Mqfl
Wondering how scientists discovered the best materials for masks? Check out the science behind our graphic below as well as the study itself! https://t.co/L52Oy1dnof. #COVID19 #coronavirus https://t.co/H0So855MJG
Health Preparedness, Available on CJO 2013 doi:10.1017/dmp.2013.43 Despres, V. R. et al. (2012) "Primary biological aerosol particles in the atmosphere: a review", Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology, 64:1, 15598, DOI: 10.3402/tellusb.v64i0.15598 Dowell, S. F. (2001)
@ArHu99 @joyce2104 @Ans2aan @MinVWS The bacterial and viral filtration performance of breathing system filters https://t.co/NrSzIDPfb0 Testing the Efficacy of Homemade Masks: Would They Protect in an Influenza Pandemic? https://t.co/4IO43v6qiA
@andrewG97042557 @JACPointon @lizoluwi @abcnews since my guess is you won't send through studies, here are a few https://t.co/Qq36ToKBlx https://t.co/rVd1ZGsTFq https://t.co/7kNGtVs9mJ https://t.co/40mfVtu9NY https://t.co/ehgpC7YMWT https://t.co/yqgIq3SJDa https://t.co/NdgloGHkou
@JACPointon https://t.co/Qq36ToKBlx https://t.co/rVd1ZGsTFq https://t.co/7kNGtVs9mJ https://t.co/40mfVtu9NY https://t.co/ehgpC7YMWT https://t.co/yqgIq3SJDa https://t.co/NdgloGHkou Here are a few studies I found. The top one is a meta-analysis so if you're lazy that could be easier for you
@RalfPeter87 @narimoldi @PGrasarevic Das stimmt eben nicht... https://t.co/r5RJzyFHfe https://t.co/sBIDyVgWr0 https://t.co/rLnUhrmgVC https://t.co/FhG17WbtET Und sogar selbsgemachte Masken sind besser als nichts... https://t.co/JphPdL8tak Allgemein: von Infizierten, wirksamer als von Gesunden getragen
RT @DrElaineChin: when is @CanadaPublic going to recommend the routine use of masks and surgical ones rather than cloth masks given they ar…
RT @DrElaineChin: How many more studies do we need to say masks work? and NOT ALL MASKS are the same. See this US study showing cloth masks…
RT @miakiza20100906: @takavet1 ちなみに、私が「マスクからエアロゾル」の件で参考にしているのは、以下のような論文です。 @hichachu : 1. https://t.co/vUq5MRRWh3 2. https://t.co/ddvuNz…
RT @miakiza20100906: @takavet1 ちなみに、私が「マスクからエアロゾル」の件で参考にしているのは、以下のような論文です。 @hichachu : 1. https://t.co/vUq5MRRWh3 2. https://t.co/ddvuNz…
@Aufdecker @HannahM_N @Uwe_Lutz_ Doch gibt es https://t.co/5CgGLcHRSO https://t.co/kF5wDlXftZ https://t.co/QHRRi1gsmt https://t.co/6PdpFPmIx3 Aus gutem Grund existiert eine gute Korrelation: Überall wo die Pandemie erfolgreich eingedämmt wurde wurden frühzeitig und konsequent Masken getragen.
when is @CanadaPublic going to recommend the routine use of masks and surgical ones rather than cloth masks given they are more effective https://t.co/Jpheu5sBx6 https://t.co/GCccyRr8rB
Davies, A., Thompson, K., Giri, K., Kafatos, G., Walker, J., & Bennett, A. (2013). Testing the Efficacy of Homemade Masks: Would They Protect in an Influenza Pandemic? Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 7(4), 413-418. doi:10.1017/dmp.2013.43
@huck68finn @choo_ek @chadloder @AlexBerenson Cambridge study; Testing the Efficacy of Homemade Masks, RE: Influenza Pandemic; DOI: 10.1017/dmp.2013.43 #covid19 #coronavirus #masks4all #masks #covidiot https://t.co/EKit8KSR43
RT @CONRICYT: Probando la eficacia de los #cubrebocas caseros: ¿protegen en el caso de una #epidemia de #influenza? https://t.co/tJtqOeVIzq…
Probando la eficacia de los #cubrebocas caseros: ¿protegen en el caso de una #epidemia de #influenza? https://t.co/tJtqOeVIzq #COVID_19 @CambridgeUP https://t.co/k5MFVAgx7m
@JB17191966 @clairlemon Seek and ye shall find... https://t.co/uEVx4pYEgi https://t.co/SpwbOqrkQL
@ultrasylt Kyllä. Näin on todettu. https://t.co/ymFRUQl2L1. https://t.co/CtJeSeUlij
@plasmamade Informatie over zelfgemaakte mondkapjes is volgens meerdere onderzoeken onjuist: Algemeen verkrijgbare huishoudelijke materialen hebben een filtratieverhouding tussen 49% en 86% voor uitgeademde deeltjes van 0,02 µm. https://t.co/uH9s4J1oRi
@AgnesWold @kvisslan Men, Agnes. Snälla, sluta. Om du inte vet, så behöver du inte svara. Svarar du fel om och om igen på sätt som äventyrar liv så är du medskyldig. Vanliga tyger blockerar mellan 10%-60% av aerosoler. Studier: https://t.co/H4b6tO76Wn https://t.co/bTWEnlQxtt https://t.co/CtAf4lPqtr
RT @miakiza20100906: @takavet1 ちなみに、私が「マスクからエアロゾル」の件で参考にしているのは、以下のような論文です。 @hichachu : 1. https://t.co/vUq5MRRWh3 2. https://t.co/ddvuNz…
RT @miakiza20100906: @takavet1 ちなみに、私が「マスクからエアロゾル」の件で参考にしているのは、以下のような論文です。 @hichachu : 1. https://t.co/vUq5MRRWh3 2. https://t.co/ddvuNz…
RT @miakiza20100906: @takavet1 ちなみに、私が「マスクからエアロゾル」の件で参考にしているのは、以下のような論文です。 @hichachu : 1. https://t.co/vUq5MRRWh3 2. https://t.co/ddvuNz…
RT @miakiza20100906: @takavet1 ちなみに、私が「マスクからエアロゾル」の件で参考にしているのは、以下のような論文です。 @hichachu : 1. https://t.co/vUq5MRRWh3 2. https://t.co/ddvuNz…
RT @miakiza20100906: @takavet1 ちなみに、私が「マスクからエアロゾル」の件で参考にしているのは、以下のような論文です。 @hichachu : 1. https://t.co/vUq5MRRWh3 2. https://t.co/ddvuNz…
RT @miakiza20100906: @takavet1 ちなみに、私が「マスクからエアロゾル」の件で参考にしているのは、以下のような論文です。 @hichachu : 1. https://t.co/vUq5MRRWh3 2. https://t.co/ddvuNz…
RT @miakiza20100906: @takavet1 ちなみに、私が「マスクからエアロゾル」の件で参考にしているのは、以下のような論文です。 @hichachu : 1. https://t.co/vUq5MRRWh3 2. https://t.co/ddvuNz…
RT @miakiza20100906: @takavet1 ちなみに、私が「マスクからエアロゾル」の件で参考にしているのは、以下のような論文です。 @hichachu : 1. https://t.co/vUq5MRRWh3 2. https://t.co/ddvuNz…
@takavet1 ちなみに、私が「マスクからエアロゾル」の件で参考にしているのは、以下のような論文です。 @hichachu : 1. https://t.co/vUq5MRRWh3 2. https://t.co/ddvuNzt5TJ 3. https://t.co/Yz1iEeQUa9 4. https://t.co/bWEbitp41Z 5. https://t.co/oi1er1TwrO
@larisolivio Amiga funciona sim!! Não é como máscara cirúrgica mas é muito melhor que nada, elas não devem ser usadas o dia todo. Devem ser lavadas a cada 4h de uso. Da uma olhada nesses textos aqui 1 - https://t.co/rJIKqpCgFx 2- https://t.co/8cTM8Z48Fy
@DIVIZIO1 l'effet n'est pas juste "psychologique" ; c'est toujours mieux que rien, même si ce n'est pas optimal (optimal, c'est 4 FFP2 par jour pour tout le monde). Voilà une étude sur l'efficacité de différents "masques artisanaux" : https://t.co/z7egg5fTjb
@MVernon_21 @itvpeston @jeremyphoward Advice to public is wear home made masks. This is based on the research below and follows on from the CDC crisis advice to Health Care Providers (HCPs) to wear home made masks if others are unavailable. Plus, less transmission means less risk to HCPs. https://t.co/9qo0pSkF35
RT @miakiza20100906: 論文メモ(3つとも無料): エアロゾルに対するマスク着用の効果: ・2010年、Bowen https://t.co/vUq5MRRWh3 ・2013年、Davies ら https://t.co/ddvuNzt5TJ ・201…
RT @miakiza20100906: 論文メモ(3つとも無料): エアロゾルに対するマスク着用の効果: ・2010年、Bowen https://t.co/vUq5MRRWh3 ・2013年、Davies ら https://t.co/ddvuNzt5TJ ・201…
論文メモ(3つとも無料): エアロゾルに対するマスク着用の効果: ・2010年、Bowen https://t.co/vUq5MRRWh3 ・2013年、Davies ら https://t.co/ddvuNzt5TJ ・2018年、Cherrie ら https://t.co/WpJCwESrSX
@ASCLS @RodneyRohde @HealthcareWen Testing the Efficacy of Homemade Masks: Would They Protect in an Influenza Pandemic? Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2013 Aug;7(4):413-8. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2013.43 https://t.co/xNpYs11JN5 https://t.co/DOtJ63vvpW #SARSCoV2 #COVID19 #PPE
Materials Effectiveness for Home-made Masks Keep in mind CIVID-19 is likely around 100nm (0.1microns) and so effectiveness could be slightly higher percentages. Source for curious- Davies (2013) Testing the Efficacy of Homemade Masks: 7. 413-418. 10.1017/dmp.2013.43. https://t.co/SbsGN0eJ54
How did we arrive at mask orthodoxy? T-shirts help us, vacuum cleaner bags too. Be creative, scoff at conservative messaging from our institutions, i.e. [pdf] Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. DOI: 10.1017/dmp.2013.43 Copyright 2013. https://t.co/YjVLSgpkXp https://t.co/q7sKJTtLyY
RT @tsukatty0123: @mobtom1 @georgebest1969 https://t.co/UtsjVmte6K https://t.co/WHSI91R8g0 このあたりでしょうか。 ・保護しないよりは良い、咳の微生物量が減る ・種類や使用方法に関わらず…
@mobtom1 @georgebest1969 https://t.co/UtsjVmte6K https://t.co/WHSI91R8g0 このあたりでしょうか。 ・保護しないよりは良い、咳の微生物量が減る ・種類や使用方法に関わらず、暴露と感染リスクを減らす可能性、エアロゾルへの防御は弱いかも となっていますが・・・
RT @clcazer: Lab experiments show that >40% (sometimes up to 90+%) of airborne particles penetrate cloth masks -https://t.co/3VFxws77L0 -ht…
Lab experiments show that >40% (sometimes up to 90+%) of airborne particles penetrate cloth masks -https://t.co/3VFxws77L0 -https://t.co/KGKVYwgou5 -https://t.co/dxvhIDNxPO -https://t.co/rw9kksyW4c
@vibriox @MarinBourg fuentes acá: Davies, A., Thompson, K., Giri, K., Kafatos, G., Walker, J., & Bennett, A. (2013). Testing the Efficacy of Homemade Masks: Would They Protect in an Influenza Pandemic? Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 7(4):413-418. doi:10.1017/dmp.2013.43
@josb1969 @InfectiousDz @CMichaelGibson Here's the actual source. The blog you linked misrepresents the results. https://t.co/a6Xt74sjtM
@wildfirediva @CMichaelGibson @ChicagoMikeSD Here's the actual source. The blog you linked misrepresents the results. https://t.co/a6Xt74sjtM
@CMichaelGibson @zeynep Here's the study you're referring to. The authors did not use particles of the size you claim. They used aerosols carrying those particles (droplets roughly 100 microns in diameter) which makes a big difference. https://t.co/a6Xt74sjtM https://t.co/zNNrs0iZwi
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24229526/
@Surgeon_General @CDCgov @WHO Evidently I need to write it in: Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2013 Aug;7(4):413-8. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2013.43. Testing the efficacy of homemade masks: would they protect in an influenza pandemic? Davies A1, Thompson KA, Giri K, Kafatos G, Walker J, Bennett A.
@ellenwalex Here's a possibly-useful study comparing different homemade masks/filters, for those who're interested: https://t.co/RI2h93RYcs
If we assume R0 of #COVID19 is 2.6, we need to reduce it by at least 62% to get below 1. This study has shown that a mask made out of a cotton T-shirt could reduce aerosol transmission by as much as 69%. Reduction of droplet transmission is likely higher! https://t.co/XtpSUvySiO
RT @je_pala: Esta es la tabla del estudio original Davies A, Thompson KA, Giri K, Kafatos G, Walker J, Bennett A. Testing the efficacy of h…
Esta es la tabla del estudio original Davies A, Thompson KA, Giri K, Kafatos G, Walker J, Bennett A. Testing the efficacy of homemade masks: would they protect in an influenza pandemic? Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2013 Aug;7(4):413-8. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2013.43 https://t.co/7mapXp9jQR
RT @ecgrhythms: @CMichaelGibson Nothing... Both surg and homemade mask reduced total number of organism Blocks microbial aerosol challeng…
RT @ecgrhythms: @CMichaelGibson Nothing... Both surg and homemade mask reduced total number of organism Blocks microbial aerosol challeng…
@schweizok2 @katjakipping Bei Weitem nicht optimal, aber völlig sinnlos ist es wiederum auch nicht! Ein fein gewebtes Baumwollgewebe, keine Kunstfaser, sollte es mind. sein. Davies et al., Dis. Med. Public Health Prep. 2013, 7 (4): 413-418. DOI: https://t.co/I0Dly1vf5E https://t.co/jHIwiSXBOD
@CMichaelGibson Nothing... Both surg and homemade mask reduced total number of organism Blocks microbial aerosol challenge. Surg mask had the hugest filtration efficacy. BTW, MS2 size is 23 nm vs SARS COV2 is 50-200 nm. DOI: 10.1017/dmp.2013.43 https://t.co/NINpG34eBf
Testing the Efficacy of Homemade Masks: Would They Protect in an Influenza Pandemic? (2013) https://t.co/GK4HmTbmyW | https://t.co/CjVh078bbw "Our findings suggest that a homemade mask should only be considered as a last resort"
The question of home-made masks comes up frequently. This is what we know. Bottom line is a surgical mask is best (with P2/N95s being theoretically but not demonstrably better), but there are some lesser alternatives. From https://t.co/4LuYW02QVc #covid19 https://t.co/TmUrxBzQBg
@chicocvenancio @roselinon @afrocamis @rafasouc o outro: Davies, A., Thompson, K., Giri, K., Kafatos, G., Walker, J., & Bennett, A. (2013). Testing the Efficacy of Homemade Masks: Would They Protect in an Influenza Pandemic? Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 7(4), 413-418. doi:10.1017/dmp.2013.43
RT @vrhovac: Kad se već bavimo šivanjem maski, vodimo računa i o materijalu koji se koristi. Džaba dupli pamuk ako je velika šansa da se vi…
Kad se već bavimo šivanjem maski, vodimo računa i o materijalu koji se koristi. Džaba dupli pamuk ako je velika šansa da se virus provuče. #COVID19 Izvor: Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, CJO 2013 doi:10.1017/dmp.2013.43 https://t.co/3hEhwldb80
DOI: 10.1017/dmp.2013.43
RT @PatrikD: They reference this cool study that was done in the aftermath of the H1N1 edpidemic (can you believe this was behind a friggin…
@gabrielsteg @DDupagne @carolinecherry Davies, Anna & Thompson, Katy-Anne & Giri, Karthika & Kafatos, George & Walker, James & Bennett, Allan. (2013). Testing the Efficacy of Homemade Masks: Would They Protect in an Influenza Pandemic?. Disaster medicine and public health preparedness. 7. 413-418. 10.1017/dmp.2013.43
"Our findings suggest that a homemade mask should only be considered as a last resort to prevent droplet transmission from infected individuals, but it would be better than no protection." https://t.co/t1TQSxeFvT https://t.co/GCgExSoekD
Testing the Efficacy of Homemade Masks: Would They Protect in an Influenza Pandemic? Article (PDF Available) in Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness 7(4):413-418 · August 2013 with 70,997 Reads DOI: 10.1017/dmp.2013.43 · Source: PubMe https://t.co/BKj4qU6rKz
@mojochessmaster @alt_kia broadly agree. there are two things I want to add. first is that masks working or not is not a binary, but more of a spectrum. this study from 2013 (https://t.co/zPupVHq65A) concludes that even -homemade masks- are better than not using one during an epidemic. second is that…
They reference this cool study that was done in the aftermath of the H1N1 edpidemic (can you believe this was behind a frigging *paywall*?) #coronavirus Testing the efficacy of homemade masks: would they protect in an influenza pandemic? https://t.co/72WzD5QPhv
@pajzbeta @AmebaTweets Pro ty bez přístupu k doi, https://t.co/cIWHTDERb1
DT
MP
C
AC
TK
?
N
M
TB
C
CK
T
C
A
KR
U
TO
IA
AU
JM
LL
L
RS
O
CB
CN
PP
AA
K
RD
JC
Z
UM
CL
UP
W
MM
BS
II
SL
H
C
MA
S
C
F
J
FS
LP
WW
SB
R
SC
D
MB
S
A
FS
TH
TM
GS
CM
R
Q
D
CC
MB
N
MW
P
HH
TF
B
ER
SC
IJ
O
PB
S
K
I
S
R
MC
SC
T
M
JC
TQ
JG
D
KP
HR
JB
M
N
S
F
JS
C
YH
KW
K
IC
D
RJ
IM
?
MA
ZW
M
Q
CO
JP
BL
FD
NR
CS
W
J
MS
RW
SC
DM
MB
Y
E
JS
KZ
DL
V
TM
AV
D
C
BI
TF
W
SA
T
V
J
L
さ
悪
DN
DC
?
H
C
C
TP
B
O
右
N
Mめ
阿明
鯖さ
ニ
SS
J
FR
RC
た
MO
N
BH
T
C
DC
NM
NG
HP
SH
EB
ME
JP
AA
CM
G
PS
ES
PE
PM
AV
AM
Z
MP
?
AK
PH
PM