Am J Clin Dermatol April 2014 PMID 24474647

Efficacy and safety of a low-level laser device in the treatment of male and female pattern hair loss: a multicenter, randomized, sham device-controlled, double-blind study.

Joaquin J Jimenez, Tongyu C Wikramanayake, Wilma Bergfeld, Maria Hordinsky, Janet G Hickman, Michael R Hamblin, Lawrence A Schachner

Mentions

21
Peak: 1 in Apr 2019
across 5 sources since Apr 2019

Extended reach

3,407,124
potential audience

Total likes

47,646

Video views

3,406,976

Mentions per month

Apr 2019 – Mar 2025

Where it's discussed

  • News9 articles
  • YouTube7 videos
  • Facebook3 posts
  • X / Twitter1 posts
  • Bluesky1 posts

AI synopsis

What people are saying

Many discussions mention the study's rigorous methodology, like the double-blind design, and its promising results, using words such as 'effective' and 'safe,' which signal cautious optimism. However, some comments highlight limitations or express skepticism, demonstrating moderate engagement without claiming the research to be a game changer.

AgreementModerate agreement

Most discussions acknowledge the study's positive findings, with some expressing cautious optimism about laser treatments for hair loss.

InterestModerate interest

The social discussions reflect moderate curiosity, with users showing interest in the potential benefits and safety of the device, but not overly enthusiastic.

EngagementModerate engagement

Participants reference specifics like the rigorous design and results, indicating a moderate level of engagement and critical thinking.

ImpactNeutral impact

The overall impact appears balanced; some users see potential for the device to influence hair loss treatments, but doubts about widespread adoption prevent higher scores.

Abstract in brief

  • The study tested whether a low-level laser device called the HairMax Lasercomb could increase hair density in men and women with pattern hair loss, using a rigorous double-blind, sham-controlled design.
  • The trial involved 146 men and 188 women, who used the device or a sham treatment three times a week for 26 weeks, with their hair density evaluated at the start, 16 weeks, and 26 weeks.
  • Results indicated that the treatment with the laser device was effective in increasing terminal hair density compared to the sham, with the study maintaining blinding for both participants and evaluators to ensure unbiased results.]

Top posts

Most liked on X and Bluesky
Prism Light Pod
@prismlightpod · X

Efficacy and safety of a low-level laser device in the treatment of male and female pattern hair loss https://t.co/ZdZNk68OMu

Oct 1, 2020 · 3 likes · 150 followers View post →
Asheville Testosterone Clinic
@avltestosteronemd.bsky.social · Bluesky

Mar 12, 2025 View post →

All mentions

Asheville Testosterone Clinic
@avltestosteronemd.bsky.social · Bluesky

Mar 12, 2025 View post →
Prism Light Pod
@prismlightpod · X

Efficacy and safety of a low-level laser device in the treatment of male and female pattern hair loss https://t.co/ZdZNk68OMu

Oct 1, 2020 · 3 likes · 150 followers View post →