Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The posts show a cautious yet interested tone, with mentions like 'Intriguing data' and the anticipation of seeing whether long-term outcomes align with prior studies, such as Kelly Metcalfe et al. (2014). The tone suggests curiosity and recognition of the study's potential influence without strong emotional or definitive language.
There is a tentative agreement, with users expressing interest in long-term outcomes but also acknowledging the need for further evidence, indicating a moderate level of support.
Discussions show genuine curiosity about the study's long-term results and implications, suggesting moderate to high interest.
Posts include references to related research and future outcomes, reflecting a thoughtful and engaged approach, though not deeply technical.
Comments highlight the potential significance of the findings for patient decision-making and future research, signaling a modest impact.
@adwilliams5 @spshubeck @MPilewskie @MSKCancerCenter @AnnSurgOncol Intriguing data! It will be interesting to see if outcomes at 20 years will be similiar to those reported by Kelly Metcalfe et al. BMJ 2014: 348. https://t.co/Cv2pDGgUJM
Are seed oils really toxic or just misunderstood? This video investigates the science behind the controversy surrounding vegetable oils like canola and soybean oil, their production, and their potential health…
@adwilliams5 @spshubeck @MPilewskie @MSKCancerCenter @AnnSurgOncol Intriguing data! It will be interesting to see if outcomes at 20 years will be similiar to those reported by Kelly Metcalfe et al. BMJ 2014: 348. https://t.co/Cv2pDGgUJM
TC