J Strength Cond Res October 2014 PMID 24662228

Electromyographic and kinetic comparison of the back squat and overhead squat.

Rodrigo R Aspe, Paul A Swinton

Full text PDF Download social card

Mentions

Peak: 2 in Jul 2021

across 5 sources since Apr 2020

Extended reach

372,762

potential audience

Total likes

3,338

Video views

333,072

Mentions per month

Apr 2020 – Sep 2023

Where it's discussed

X / Twitter6 posts
Facebook5 posts
YouTube4 videos
News2 articles
Blogs2 articles

AI synopsis

What people are saying

Overall, the discussions show a positive reception, with comments like 'OHS predicts score' and 'squats do so much for the body,' highlighting practical takeaways. Some posts reference recommendations and specific measurement techniques, illustrating moderate engagement, while others emphasize the overall benefits of squats for mobility and core strength, reflecting the study’s influence on fitness practices.

AgreementModerate agreement

The majority of discussions support the findings, emphasizing the benefits of squats and the nuanced differences between back and overhead squats.

InterestHigh interest

Many posts express high interest, with comments highlighting the practical implications for strength training and injury prevention.

EngagementModerate engagement

Posts include references to specific methods and broader fitness concepts, indicating moderate engagement with the research details.

ImpactModerate impact

The conversations reflect recognition of the study's importance for training routines and understanding muscle activation, though they are not transformative, high-impact discussions.

Abstract in brief

The study compared muscle activity and force output during back squats and overhead squats at different intensities, finding that the overhead squat increased activity in front trunk muscles (like the rectus abdominis and external oblique) during the eccentric (lowering) phase, but overall differences were small.
The back squat generated greater force and more activity in the posterior (backside) trunk muscles (such as erector spinae) and lower body muscles during the upward (concentric) phase, indicating it might be more effective for developing those muscles.
Electromyographic data from trunk isolation exercises showed higher activity in front trunk muscles compared to squats, but the highest activity in back trunk muscles still occurred during the squats; overall, the overhead squat does not seem to provide a significantly greater benefit for developing trunk muscles than the back squat.]

Read the full abstract