PubHawk
BJU Int April 2014 PMID 24765679

Do ureteric stent extraction strings affect stent-related quality of life or complications after ureteroscopy for urolithiasis: a prospective randomised control trial.

Kerri T Barnes, Megan T Bing, Chad R Tracy

Full text PDF Download social card

Mentions

5
Peak: 2 in Jan 2022
across 3 sources since Mar 2014

Extended reach

388,608
potential audience

Total likes

2

Video views

386,961

Mentions per month

Mar 2014 – Jan 2022

Where it's discussed

  • X / Twitter2 posts
  • Blogs2 articles
  • YouTube1 videos

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The overall tone demonstrates agreement and practical interest, exemplified by posts stating that strings increase convenience and reduce economic burden with no rise in complications, and questions regarding infection risks over extended periods. The words and tone convey a focus on real-world application and validation through prior data, contributing to a nuanced understanding of the publication’s significance.

AgreementModerate agreement

Most discussions show strong support for the publication's findings, with users emphasizing the benefits of using extraction strings without increasing risks.

InterestModerate interest

The discussions reflect a moderate level of interest, focusing on practical implications and previous research rather than deep theoretical analysis.

EngagementModerate engagement

Participants reference specific studies and experiences, indicating a meaningful level of engagement with the research.

ImpactModerate impact

The conversations suggest that these findings could influence clinical practices, highlighting potential benefits of using extraction strings in patient care.

Abstract in brief

  • The study compared outcomes for patients with ureteric stents who had an extraction string versus those without to see if the string affected quality of life or complications after ureteroscopy for kidney stones.
  • Results showed no significant difference in stent-related quality of life, pain, urinary infections, or emergency visits between the two groups, suggesting the extraction string does not increase complications.
  • However, patients with strings could remove their stent early if they pulled the string, and those without strings had longer durations of stent placement, indicating potential benefits of using extraction strings without added risks.
Read the full abstract

Top posts

Most liked on X and Bluesky
Ryan L. Steinberg MD
@ryansteinbergmd · X

@nishanturo @DrDAgarwal @amy_krambeck 100% agree. Stent with string almost always, not when dislodgement a problem (eg perf). Any data about UTI concern with >10d dwell time? Prior work by @ChadTracyMD showed no difference at POD7. https://t.co/eFFBL6DCpa

Jan 8, 2022 · 2 likes · 1,241 followers View post →
Federico López
@FedeLopezFe · X

RT @ChadTracyMD: @DrDAgarwal @amy_krambeck Strings- increased convenience, decreased economic burden, no increase in complications. Some pa…

Jan 10, 2022 · 1 share · 404 followers View post →

All mentions

Federico López
@FedeLopezFe · X

RT @ChadTracyMD: @DrDAgarwal @amy_krambeck Strings- increased convenience, decreased economic burden, no increase in complications. Some pa…

Jan 10, 2022 · 1 share · 404 followers View post →
Ryan L. Steinberg MD
@ryansteinbergmd · X

@nishanturo @DrDAgarwal @amy_krambeck 100% agree. Stent with string almost always, not when dislodgement a problem (eg perf). Any data about UTI concern with >10d dwell time? Prior work by @ChadTracyMD showed no difference at POD7. https://t.co/eFFBL6DCpa

Jan 8, 2022 · 2 likes · 1,241 followers View post →