Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The overall commentary reveals a strong consensus that publication bias has overestimated the ego depletion effect, with participants discussing the new meta-analytical findings and their implications. The tone is analytical and reflective, highlighting the importance of rigorous methods and questioning long-held assumptions, which underscores the high impact and interest in this discussion.
Most discussions agree that publication bias has significantly distorted previous beliefs about ego depletion effects, supporting the article's critical view.
The discussions demonstrate high curiosity and engagement with the topic, referencing new analyses and implications for psychology.
Participants are actively analyzing data, methods, and implications, reflecting deep engagement with the research and its validity.
The debates emphasize a major shift in understanding ego depletion, indicating a substantial impact on future research and theories in psychology.
We have some clear cases where publication bias kept hundreds of researchers busy for decades, even though they were all only sharing Type 1 errors: Ego-depletion research. https://t.co/xhUCriGoL5 Recent large scale studies corroborated this prediction of an effect of ~0. https://t.co/2FbsEw5Jzq
6| Quellen: Q1: https://t.co/cktDZKARVh Q2: https://t.co/5shce1s0GS Q3: https://t.co/kPx1g4hwZ6 Q4: https://t.co/iJ6pkrsnfj Q5: https://t.co/ZBI1JEfRbj
These observed (d = .50) and adjusted (d = .22) effect sizes are virtually identical to the results from meta-analyses of the ego depletion effect (d ≈ .60/.20; https://t.co/f4t2eNjxjA), which disappeared completely in registered replication MA (d=.04; https://t.co/pjaReShxFv) https://t.co/QOHvJwVoXh
@dkokdemir İkincisi, ego depletion literatüründe zaten ciddi bir publication bias var: https://t.co/5OJAcL1ExL Dolayısıyla preregistered olmayan, tek tük oradan buradan çalışmaların basılıyor olması zaten hiç sürpriz değil. Sonuç çıkmayan ve basılmayan tonla başka çalışma var.
@_onurcanyilmaz Tek çalışmada ölmedi ki zaten, yıllardır azar azar ölüyor. Destekleyici görülen bulgular bile aslında büyük resimde desteklemiyor: https://t.co/5OJAcL1ExL
@drboothroyd @MaxPrimbs @LisaDeBruine Yes, that is the estimate using PET (see https://t.co/RcvQ4dme2U by @ME_McCullough and @ec_cart which is where I got it from). Remember PET has assumptions which might not hold so we do not know if the estimate = truth.
The limited strength model suggests self-control diminishes after exertion, but recent analysis questions whether ego depletion is a genuine effect or overestimated due to publication bias and small-study effects…
The limited strength model suggests self-control wanes after exertion. This analysis questions the reliability of the ego depletion effect, highlighting potential overestimations due to publication bias and small-study…
This analysis questions the validity of the ego depletion effect, highlighting how publication bias and small-study effects may have led to overestimated evidence for self-control limits. Rigorous methods are essential…
The backstory and the explanation of the method can be found here (although the plots they show in the paper are slightly less self-explanatory) https://t.co/ocanLnoYsS
@cjvanlissa @Oliver_S_Curry @JZBerman No paradox or contradiction implied. Just an eerie sense of déjà vu. With ego depletion, it all started with better correcting for pub bias, https://t.co/ZqeYgGE60s. Now, I like the giving-happiness effect, so hopefully this feeling is misplaced.
6| Quellen: Q1: https://t.co/cktDZKARVh Q2: https://t.co/5shce1s0GS Q3: https://t.co/kPx1g4hwZ6 Q4: https://t.co/iJ6pkrsnfj Q5: https://t.co/ZBI1JEfRbj
These observed (d = .50) and adjusted (d = .22) effect sizes are virtually identical to the results from meta-analyses of the ego depletion effect (d ≈ .60/.20; https://t.co/f4t2eNjxjA), which disappeared completely in registered replication MA (d=.04; https://t.co/pjaReShxFv) https://t.co/QOHvJwVoXh
RT @lakens: We have some clear cases where publication bias kept hundreds of researchers busy for decades, even though they were all only s…
RT @lakens: We have some clear cases where publication bias kept hundreds of researchers busy for decades, even though they were all only s…
RT @lakens: We have some clear cases where publication bias kept hundreds of researchers busy for decades, even though they were all only s…
RT @lakens: We have some clear cases where publication bias kept hundreds of researchers busy for decades, even though they were all only s…
RT @lakens: We have some clear cases where publication bias kept hundreds of researchers busy for decades, even though they were all only s…
We have some clear cases where publication bias kept hundreds of researchers busy for decades, even though they were all only sharing Type 1 errors: Ego-depletion research. https://t.co/xhUCriGoL5 Recent large scale studies corroborated this prediction of an effect of ~0. https://t.co/2FbsEw5Jzq
制限はないと覆った 意志力は無限にあると覆った #自分用メモ https://t.co/3dKYwmIULd https://t.co/ysga4BWZrk https://t.co/deTtFbuGQ6
@_onurcanyilmaz Tek çalışmada ölmedi ki zaten, yıllardır azar azar ölüyor. Destekleyici görülen bulgular bile aslında büyük resimde desteklemiyor: https://t.co/5OJAcL1ExL
@dkokdemir İkincisi, ego depletion literatüründe zaten ciddi bir publication bias var: https://t.co/5OJAcL1ExL Dolayısıyla preregistered olmayan, tek tük oradan buradan çalışmaların basılıyor olması zaten hiç sürpriz değil. Sonuç çıkmayan ve basılmayan tonla başka çalışma var.
@drboothroyd @MaxPrimbs @LisaDeBruine Yes, that is the estimate using PET (see https://t.co/RcvQ4dme2U by @ME_McCullough and @ec_cart which is where I got it from). Remember PET has assumptions which might not hold so we do not know if the estimate = truth.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00823. Chau, J. Y., Grunseit, A. C., Chey, T., Stamatakis, E., Brown, W. J., Matthews, C. E., et al. (2013). Daily sitting ...
doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00823 13. A small proportion of the participants of Study 2 (roughly Chong, I.-G., & Jun, C.-H. (2005). Performance of some vari- 3.5 ...
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00823. Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F. (1982). Control theory: A useful conceptual framework for personality–social ...
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00823. Dai, H., Milkman, K. L., Hofmann, D. A., Staats, B. R. (2014). The impact of time at work and time off from work on ...
5 (Temmuz 2014), https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00823. 5 Evan C. Carter ve diğ., "A Series of Meta-analytic Tests of the. Depletion Effect: Self-Control ...
... 5.http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00823. ფაქტორი ის არის, რომ ბევრი არგუმენტი, რომელიც თავდაპირველად ...
doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00823. Cochran, W. G. (1952). The χ2 test of goodness of fit. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 23, 315–345. doi:10.1214/ aoms ...
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00823. Dang, J. (2018). An updated meta-analysis of the ego depletion effect. Psychological Research, 82(4), 645–651 ...
?' Frontiers in Psychology (2014), doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00823. 'A Multilab Preregistered Replication of the Ego-Depletion Effect ...
Frontiers in Psychology, juli 2014, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00823. Hagger, Chatzisarantis mfl: A Multilab Preregistered Replication of the ...
Először is, nézd meg ezt a 2014-es meta-analízist](http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00823/full). Egy korábbi meta ...
Primeiro, dá uma olhada nessa meta-análise de 2014](http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00823/full). Uma meta-análise ...
DL
TS
BW
SA
AK
SK
ME
CL
FS
CF
RH
T