ومع300 نقرة إعجاب نصل إلى فهم دقيق للفرد يتجاوز معرفة حتى الزوج المصدر Youyou, W., Kosinski, M., & Stillwell, D.(2014) Computer-Based Personality Judgments Are More Accurate than Those Made by Humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans.
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
Jan 2015 – Sep 2025Where it's discussed
-
News220 articles
-
Facebook99 posts
-
X / Twitter41 posts
-
Blogs38 articles
-
Reddit11 posts
-
YouTube4 videos
-
Bluesky2 posts
AI synopsis
What people are saying
Several passages cite specific studies, notably from institutions like Stanford and Cambridge, underscoring the accuracy of computer models in personality assessment. Discussions frequently use words like 'more accurate,' 'better,' and 'significant,' reflecting a tone of enthusiasm and acknowledgment of the research’s importance. The tone and contextual references indicate a recognition of the potential for these findings to alter everyday assessments, psychological practices, and privacy concerns.
Most discussions strongly support the claim that computer-based personality judgments outperform human assessments, with many explicitly mentioning studies and emphasizing technological superiority.
Posts demonstrate high curiosity by referencing multiple studies and findings, indicating that the topic resonates with current technological debates and psychological assessment methods.
Numerous discussions delve into methodological details, implications, and ethical considerations, showing deep engagement with both the research and its broader impact.
The overall tone suggests that many consider this research groundbreaking, with comments implying it could revolutionize psychological evaluation, privacy considerations, and even societal understanding of human behavior.
Abstract in brief
- Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than human judgments, especially when using data like Facebook Likes, with computers showing an accuracy of .056 compared to humans' .049.
- Computer models also demonstrate higher agreement among different judges and better predict real-life outcomes such as health, political attitudes, and substance use.
- The ability of computers to outperform humans in personality judgment offers both opportunities for better psychological assessment and concerns related to privacy and ethical use.]
Top posts
Most liked on X and Blueskyこれ論文も出てて、8万人のFacebookユーザを対象に個人の好みに関する100個の質問をしたところ、その人の友人ユーザによる答えの予想よりも、その人がFacebookで押したいいね!を機械学習した方が正答率が高かったという話。 https://t.co/q4l5eadr3d https://t.co/VHr0Tr30yv
Source: Youyou, Kosinski & Stillwell (2015) Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans PNAS https://t.co/Uj3Cd7kc8q Next up: They Knew in 2015: Computers Can Know You Better Than Your Friends #Disinformation #DigitalProfiling
This concludes the series based on: Youyou et al. (2015), PNAS https://t.co/Uj3Cd7kc8q
Source: Youyou, Kosinski & Stillwell (2015) Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans PNAS www.pnas.org/doi/10.... Next up: They Knew in 2015: Computers Can Know You Better Than Your Friends #Disinformation #DigitalProfiling
دراسة بجامعة كاليفورنيا " خوازميات الكمبيوتر أدق من البشر في تحليل السمات الشخصية" من نتائج الدراسة : دقة الخوازميات في تحليل سماتك الشخصية وسلوكك: تحتاج الخوازميات فقط إلى 10 إعجابات لتفوق دقة زميلك في العمل، و 70 إعجابًا لتفوق دقة رفيقك المقرّب، و 150 https://t.co/NAsfun74C7
All mentions
How Facebook Extracts and Processes User Data for Profiling and Targeting
This video explains how Facebook's algorithmic mediation functions, detailing data extraction, processing, psychological profiling, microtargeting, and feed curation. It also discusses psychological and ethical issues…
How Facebook Extracts and Processes User Data for Profiling
Assessing Personality Traits Using Digital Footprints in a Scientific Context
This video explains how digital footprints can be used to measure personality traits, highlighting the accuracy of computer-based judgments versus human assessments and discussing implications for psychological…
Enhanced Accuracy of Computer-Based Personality Assessments
Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than human judgments, particularly using data like social media interactions. These models also exhibit higher agreement and better predict real-life outcomes…
Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans
RT @DucuGavril: This concludes the series based on: Youyou et al. (2015), PNAS https://t.co/Uj3Cd7kc8q
RT @DucuGavril: This concludes the series based on: Youyou et al. (2015), PNAS https://t.co/Uj3Cd7kc8q
Source: Youyou, Kosinski & Stillwell (2015), PNAS https://t.co/Uj3Cd7kc8q
RT @DucuGavril: Source: Youyou, Kosinski & Stillwell (2015) Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by human…
This concludes the series based on: Youyou et al. (2015), PNAS https://t.co/Uj3Cd7kc8q
RT @DucuGavril: Source: Youyou, Kosinski & Stillwell (2015) Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by human…
Source: Youyou, Kosinski & Stillwell (2015) Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans PNAS www.pnas.org/doi/10.... Next up: They Knew in 2015: Computers Can Know You Better Than Your Friends #Disinformation #DigitalProfiling
Source: Youyou, Kosinski & Stillwell (2015) Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans PNAS https://t.co/Uj3Cd7kc8q Next up: They Knew in 2015: Computers Can Know You Better Than Your Friends #Disinformation #DigitalProfiling
Who's jobs were replaced in 2015? Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans | PNAS https://t.co/QYHh9St9TI
And Stanford had published a study on this topic in Jan 2015!! https://t.co/yqL0ngpF8p
Previous paper by author on what he describes as "Believable proxies of human behavior" or "human behavior simulation" published in 2023.
Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans https://t.co/cnzH3KBNKI
RT @xharaken: これ論文も出てて、8万人のFacebookユーザを対象に個人の好みに関する100個の質問をしたところ、その人の友人ユーザによる答えの予想よりも、その人がFacebookで押したいいね!を機械学習した方が正答率が高かったという話。 https://t.…
RT @xharaken: これ論文も出てて、8万人のFacebookユーザを対象に個人の好みに関する100個の質問をしたところ、その人の友人ユーザによる答えの予想よりも、その人がFacebookで押したいいね!を機械学習した方が正答率が高かったという話。 https://t.…
RT @xharaken: これ論文も出てて、8万人のFacebookユーザを対象に個人の好みに関する100個の質問をしたところ、その人の友人ユーザによる答えの予想よりも、その人がFacebookで押したいいね!を機械学習した方が正答率が高かったという話。 https://t.…
RT @xharaken: これ論文も出てて、8万人のFacebookユーザを対象に個人の好みに関する100個の質問をしたところ、その人の友人ユーザによる答えの予想よりも、その人がFacebookで押したいいね!を機械学習した方が正答率が高かったという話。 https://t.…
RT @xharaken: これ論文も出てて、8万人のFacebookユーザを対象に個人の好みに関する100個の質問をしたところ、その人の友人ユーザによる答えの予想よりも、その人がFacebookで押したいいね!を機械学習した方が正答率が高かったという話。 https://t.…
RT @xharaken: これ論文も出てて、8万人のFacebookユーザを対象に個人の好みに関する100個の質問をしたところ、その人の友人ユーザによる答えの予想よりも、その人がFacebookで押したいいね!を機械学習した方が正答率が高かったという話。 https://t.…
これ論文も出てて、8万人のFacebookユーザを対象に個人の好みに関する100個の質問をしたところ、その人の友人ユーザによる答えの予想よりも、その人がFacebookで押したいいね!を機械学習した方が正答率が高かったという話。 https://t.co/q4l5eadr3d https://t.co/VHr0Tr30yv
Un programa informático puede predecir cómo es una persona basándose, por ejemplo, en sus «me gusta» de Facebook, incluso mejor que sus amigos, su familia o su pareja, ya que recopila información de casi todas las facetas de su vida. https://t.co/aRVxqtpq2B https://t.co/TdNscXCyzj
@weswinham @Kellblog Here’s some other research showing computer-based personality inference can be more accurate than friends and family assessments and as accurate as spousal assessment https://t.co/vwFHVkBguF https://t.co/0aj4W1nNfW
@weswinham @Kellblog Here’s a study on accuracy of computer based inference of personality by Stanford et al researchers https://t.co/vwFHVkBguF https://t.co/5IBxzot2lD
دراسة بجامعة كاليفورنيا " خوازميات الكمبيوتر أدق من البشر في تحليل السمات الشخصية" من نتائج الدراسة : دقة الخوازميات في تحليل سماتك الشخصية وسلوكك: تحتاج الخوازميات فقط إلى 10 إعجابات لتفوق دقة زميلك في العمل، و 70 إعجابًا لتفوق دقة رفيقك المقرّب، و 150 https://t.co/NAsfun74C7
https://t.co/5vnfvTgoIN
@HansLandman @SjefVugt @HaHaGentherapie @cwitteveen1 @Ladyjustice1312 @ToKnowOrNot @Miraloml @vpknerd @Charlot2409 @Lipsiaan @JanssenJh @JasperRTuijnman @LaceyX1989 @DirkvanLinth @Singing_BumbleB @Luketheduke1960 @Bartje46198812 Zeker van? De algoritmes kennen u beter dan uw familie. Elke keer dat je googlet, beweegt, iets aankoopt, iets liked, retweet,... levert dat een datapunt op. Wees blij dat overheden ons daarin beschermen en het delen van deze data aan banden legt. https://t.co/0T3uB1vp9t
RT @Ehabfhmy2017: ومع300 نقرة إعجاب نصل إلى فهم دقيق للفرد يتجاوز معرفة حتى الزوج المصدر Youyou, W., Kosinski, M., & Stillwell, D.(2014) Co…
ومع300 نقرة إعجاب نصل إلى فهم دقيق للفرد يتجاوز معرفة حتى الزوج المصدر Youyou, W., Kosinski, M., & Stillwell, D.(2014) Computer-Based Personality Judgments Are More Accurate than Those Made by Humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Here's the study in case someone wants to have a look. https://t.co/ogUaeisPwN
Tenemos reunión del grupo de Comunicación Transhumana de #RELASSC y vamos a discutir el paper "computer based personality judgments..." y me toca introducir el modelo de los 5 factores de la personalidad. https://t.co/YCn1n1Q1af Hoy se roba fuerte las slides de @hugosimkin
Opinion: #Facebook Dating was set to take over the market. Instead it was dead in the water @ConversationEDU https://t.co/xDXxsp86AR https://t.co/SpyufGXFbV
RT @TechXplore_com: Opinion: #Facebook Dating was set to take over the market. Instead it was dead in the water @ConversationEDU https://t.…
Current Reading : https://t.co/drSrF46hZi
Computer-based personality judgments: the next #MyersBriggs or the next “Personality Brokers” #Bestseller by @mervatim? Voting for the latter
Using a sample of 86.220 volunteers, researchers from University of Cambridge & Stanford University discovered that computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans. https://t.co/8clcd9iQoM
Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans https://t.co/Lv2uxXx85l
@MarcdeFalco @michalkosinski J'ai trouvé, c'est la figure 2 de (accès libre) "Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans" publié dans PNAS en 2015 https://t.co/Ddanbgz8Ah
Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans https://t.co/elISxIZVRo
@pablo_ortellado Youyou, W., Kosinski, M., & Stillwell, D. (2015). Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(4), 1036-1040.
Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans (paper) - PNAS https://t.co/OJHaDDPjPU #AI
Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans https://t.co/j8R1hPWZn6 via @instapaper
Computer-Based Personality Judgments Are More Accurate Than Those Made by Humans | Gadget Gestures https://t.co/X7d761T2ca
Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans http://www.theequitykicker.com/2015/01/15/computer-based-personality-judgments-accurate-made-humans/ via @brisbourne