Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The group’s tone reflects a strong consensus backing the direct observational evidence from Feldman et al. (2015), exemplified by references to measurement techniques, DOI links, and citations of foundational experiments like Tyndall (1861); words such as 'empirical evidence', 'confirmation', and 'scientific validation' highlight their emphasis on rigorous data, which supports the consensus on CO2’s role in radiative forcing and climate change.
Most discussions support the findings of Feldman et al. (2015), emphasizing observational evidence of CO2's role in radiative forcing, which underpins the consensus.
Participants show high engagement with detailed references to major studies like Feldman (2015) and related papers, indicating strong interest in empirical data and scientific validation.
Many discussions involve referencing specific research, DOI links, and critiques of methodology, demonstrating deep involvement and active interpretation of the research.
Widespread acknowledgment of the observational evidence confirms the significant effect of CO2 on Earth's energy balance, reinforcing its impact on climate science and policy debates.
@TPotapczyk @SebRoss4 2) https://t.co/RWHdFvqukW od końca 19 wieku wiemy o tym, że CO2 jest gazem cieplarnianymhttps://edibleschoolyard.org/resource/greenhouse-lab https://t.co/TYpEN8L58c obserwujemy bezpośrednio że zmienia się bilans radiacyjny https://t.co/dpVHE8dbmZ wiemy jak mocno wpływają g.c.
@DarrenDrpage @rwerkh @patfrank830 @SchneidGabriel @PoyetPatrice @ejwwest @kissingtruth @DoubleDumas @Rebecca74083947 @JimBowersclimb @alangnixon @kevhof52 @COrepKdeGraaf @FredHikes @military_1776 @TWTThisIsNow @GlonvecHQ @BrknMan @RCownie @Proemed45 @ICcrapdaily @ClimateRetorts @Konrad_Chapman @LxxResearcher @CymaticWave @BarbaraGirouard @HmGinYYC @priscian @SGMTrailbuilder @NdabaningiMoyo @HeidlerNeal @agentsinaction @dsjost @BoryanLeChat @EdWellham @AtomsksSanakan @Pow_Pop_Blam @mic12052 @MikeHudema @MichaelEMann CO2 is a well mixed gas fairly rapidly in No Hemisphere Check the work of Feldman et al Nature 519:339-343 2015 https://t.co/lllG0TmvBn Note the difficulty, so Barrow, Alaska chosen with low humidity and clear sky conditions used to improve signal-to-noise
@JediMasterCoggy @FM_Ziggy @original_lego11 @ryankatzrosene Then debunk Feldman, piece by piece, then. I’ve been asking for two days, still nothing. “The sound of silence”. https://t.co/VQB2mDMsI1
@Neuropa_ @MarekAdamJan1 @Gigantus198 @OliverHaussman @jakubwiech 2. CO2 jest gazem cieplarnianym. Jeżeli jest go więcej to lepiej absorbuje promieniowanie podczerwone i ociepla planetę. Co obserwujemy również https://t.co/TYpEN8KxiE
@FreeSpeech4U_Me @Bostons80113133 @NatalieCarmody @ZombiePiano @karleastlondon @Calltoart @GeraldKutney @OscarsWild1 @Data79504085 @LabourOutOfScot @JustinTemplerSr @ScienceBlog3 @CanadianSence @aSinister @EnoNevarraw @Fossil_Herb @w_koppen @S_Metzeler @FredHikes @shafercw @craigthomler @BobPartridge16 @emilio97493490 @25_cycle @snarkfiend @6lennybravo @DawnJT90 @_nwblacksmith @OzzmanOsgood @USAMRIID_CA @nonsequiturmeme @ZorikaZr @GaryNicholls52 @CDCollins5269 @BrknMan @CorrectThyAre @benmooreau @SRT298 @FBreject1 @Daveh5274 @Rosie45703313 @GerdtzW @Royalacresrod @ejwwest @RonRessler3 @Veritatem2021 @ammocrypta @KeillerDon @JimBowersclimb @HailFromTheVoid wrong wrong wrong ... Historical Fourier (1827) (hyp) Foote (1857) (exp) Tyndall (1861) (lab exp) Arrrhenius (1896) (EBM) Recent Feldman etal (2015) DOI 10.1038/nature14240 Rae etal (2021, 2023) DOI 10.1146/annurev-earth-082420-06302
@25_cycle @bannister_jimbo @hausfath hey slackjaw ... look it up - Feldman etal (2015) Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 DOI 10.1038/nature14240 https://t.co/g7VNR4MS46
This video examines the assertion that climate always changes, countering it with logic and hard evidence. It references significant research showing rapid and notable global temperature increases, emphasizing the role…
@JJJungleJim @BubbasRanch @outwestwoods @Funkinelly @Kenneth72712993 @CaptFligh @FillmoreWhite @thetreegens @FreeSpeech4Me_U @JR4_Truth @PaprikaLady @benmooreau @ZSRenn @SteveJenks63 @Jaisans @Veritatem2021 @Lo_VVriter @Spencerfletch0 @Realnotdreamer @B_Bolshevik100 @BJChippindale @xxghostface420 @aSinister @variegated2 @ejwwest @roger_clague @JoshSehn @rubiginosa @Homer4K @LouisCy72344053 @Roark_Architect @TomPlesier @JohnDublin10 @FChecker76 @jefftonna1 @fagandr1 @DawnTJ90 @DaveWRose @mentalmal1 @LofayPeter @BigRakaDoc @no2wind Is your internet down today? Here you go: Feldman, D. R. et al. Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010. Nature 519, 339–343 (2015). Doi:10.1038/nature14240
@BobHunter17 Feldman, D.R. et al. (2015). Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO₂ from 2000 to 2010. Nature, 519, 339–343. → Measured increasing infrared absorption from rising CO₂ in the real atmosphere. (In short: not saturated, still warming.)
@sev_le_dev @DGinOTC @newstart_2024 then you should have no difficulty demonstrating experimentally that Feldman (2015) is incorrect do tell us when your paper is ready for publication ! Feldman etal (2015) Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 DOI 10.1038/nature14240 https://t.co/g0vKa4G2lf
@END2008 Feldman (2015) Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 DOI 10.1038/nature14240 https://t.co/25gLSUKvi7
@TomPlayford3 @MedBennett @ProfBillMcGuire "Nuh Uh" "There are NO studies, the ones you linked don't exist" "That 1,000,000 year graph you used only shows 500 years somehow! Little ice age!!!" Here is another since you ignored the first 2 https://t.co/QBdlxvIjPp
@SchneidGabriel @Michi86E Sie sind da etwas sehr Spannendem auf der Spur. Sie haben nämlich nicht ganz unrecht: Mit steigender Temp. kann das Meer weniger CO₂ speichern, dadurch steigt der CO₂-Gehalt. Aber für Ihren ersten Punkt habe ich tatsächlich eine spannende Studie für Sie: https://t.co/oTjBdYxSO4
The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/VNcxS67NxL #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 https://t.co/I7GKkjaPv0
@Kenneth72712993 @PLURguy87 @ADevotedYogi Feldman et al. (2015, Nature) — surface measurement Directly measured the increase in downwelling longwave radiation from rising CO₂ using DOE/ARM spectrometers (2000–2010). About 0.2 W/m² per decade — causal, not theory.
The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/SGt9gu2Qlp #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 https://t.co/MaKuCXR5qO
@VandenbergheAn6 @DoubakL @AssoClimatoReal L'existence de l'effet de serre et le rôle du CO2 sont établis scientifiquement grâce aux lois de la physique, aux observations, aux mesures, etc. Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 - Feldman et al., 2015 https://t.co/NlE7hBLktQ
The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/SGt9gu2ivR #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 https://t.co/MaKuCXQxBg
The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/VNcxS67NxL #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 https://t.co/I7GKkjaPv0
The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/SGt9gu2Qlp #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 https://t.co/MaKuCXR5qO
RT @Barba_Phil51323: @vlad243347 @AssoClimatoReal Pourquoi cela serait indéfendable, selon vous ? Au contraire, cela repose sur l'applicati…
The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/SGt9gu2ivR #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 https://t.co/MaKuCXQxBg
@vlad243347 @AssoClimatoReal Pourquoi cela serait indéfendable, selon vous ? Au contraire, cela repose sur l'application des lois de la physiques et sur des observations, par ex. : Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010- Feldman et al., 2015 https://t.co/NlE7hBLktQ
@bjames280961 @latimeralder In this paper, Scientists used field instruments at two US sites (Oklahoma and Alaska). They measured a clear increase in heat energy due to rising CO₂ Title: Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO₂ from 2000 to 2010 https://t.co/LuPrQaD5XJ
@ZORME78 @LSA_888 @AssoClimatoReal Pourquoi le CO2 ne pourrait-il pas changer le climat, selon vous ? Les mesures montrent d'ailleurs le contraire : Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 - Feldman et al., 2015 https://t.co/NlE7hBLSjo https://t.co/uGyia2FhG9
The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/SGt9gu2ivR #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 https://t.co/MaKuCXQxBg
@richardwilson68 The energy transfer has been calculated, and measured. Feldman et al. in Nature, 2015 directly observed the increased infrared radiation from rising CO₂ at the surface. This is peer-reviewed research, tested in labs. https://t.co/jzCkHgy0E8
@EtterWerner @belmontes0815 Feldman et al. (2015), Nature – «Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO₂ from 2000 to 2010»
@Daves_Rice @MatthewWielicki The claim about Knut Ångström “proving” CO₂ stops warming after a certain point is both outdated and misleading.
@MariuszKlosEU @Neuropa_ Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO₂ from 2000 to 2010 Increases in greenhouse forcing inferred from the outgoing longwave radiation spectra of the Earth Bo co z tego, skoro obserwujące cię orają, skoro wystarczy o tym nie mówić w badaniu?
The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/VNcxS68lnj #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 https://t.co/I7GKkjbnky
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26900086/ "On the causal structure between CO2 and global temperature" - Stips et al, 2016. Increased radiative forcing by CO2 has been observed and measured directly: "Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010" - Feldman et al 2015
The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/VNcxS67NxL #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 https://t.co/I7GKkjaPv0
The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/SGt9gu2Qlp #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 https://t.co/MaKuCXR5qO
@JediMasterCoggy @FM_Ziggy @original_lego11 @ryankatzrosene Then debunk Feldman, piece by piece, then. I’ve been asking for two days, still nothing. “The sound of silence”. https://t.co/VQB2mDMsI1
@ClimateRetorts @marco_borrano @original_lego11 @JediMasterCoggy @ryankatzrosene You did nothing, do your job. https://t.co/VQB2mDN0xz
@JediMasterCoggy @ClimateRetorts @_illep @marco_borrano @original_lego11 @ryankatzrosene https://t.co/VQB2mDMsI1
@ClimateRetorts @marco_borrano @original_lego11 @JediMasterCoggy @ryankatzrosene You’re blatantly lying (as usual), the calculation was right there, in plain sight (post below). Stop dodging and go refute Feldman et al. (2015) line by line, or admit you can’t. Enough with the pigeon chess, time to show your cards. C’mon: https://t.co/VQB2mDMsI1 https://t.co/MlZhbhVLWc
@ClimateRetorts @original_lego11 @JediMasterCoggy @ryankatzrosene Yep. https://t.co/VQB2mDN0xz
@JediMasterCoggy @ClimateRetorts @original_lego11 @ryankatzrosene Disprove it, piece by piece, please. https://t.co/VQB2mDMsI1
@ClimateRetorts @original_lego11 @JediMasterCoggy @ryankatzrosene Do you prefer that? LoL https://t.co/Y7bIoEfMIy
The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/SGt9gu2Qlp #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 https://t.co/MaKuCXR5qO
@Visitor51171015 @Andreas02571274 @WolfgangHummel @marcfriedrich7 https://t.co/EoDwkpUmYa
The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/VNcxS68lnj #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 https://t.co/I7GKkjbnky
@TruthHurtsDemz @JunkScience https://t.co/oW6BngXhXW
@Nathan_R_Jessep @_illep @FHeidolon @Albert_Caeiro Harries https://t.co/4seyNc0kkw Feldman https://t.co/VQB2mDMsI1 Ou e Liou (questo è una chicca e mi é costato una cazziata. Leggilo e ti accorgi perché) https://t.co/08RUwRsX2j Continuo?
@Nathan_R_Jessep @_illep @FHeidolon @Albert_Caeiro https://t.co/fgCkWfsZzk https://t.co/Y7bIoEfMIy
The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/SGt9gu2ivR #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 https://t.co/MaKuCXQxBg
@liberalismONCMD @AndrewYang https://t.co/GOpT3Ha2Nf Here you go, idiot.
@Frexit_TV @AssoClimatoReal De quel principe physique parlez-vous ? Pourquoi le CO2 cesserait d'agir comme un GES au delà de 400 ppm ? Les mesures démontrent pourtant le contraire : Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000-2010 - Feldman et al., 2015 https://t.co/NlE7hBLktQ
The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/SGt9gu2ivR #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 https://t.co/MaKuCXQxBg
The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/VNcxS67NxL #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 https://t.co/I7GKkjaPv0
@MLeiter42 @jimdtweet @Scizz8 @jgorman2424 @BubbasRanch @josiejessop631 @4RealClimate @WHPAAD @WayneAllanH @Mark_A_Lunn @ChrisBBacon3 @TrixX306 @rln_nelson @Kenneth72712993 @ladyspat1 @craigthomler @Frnc_prep @Michael_D_Crow @CDCollins5269 @Ernestops78 @JamesAbbott2013 @LexWaters7 @phlannelphysics @ammocrypta @dafalgoutDennis @evenminded512 @patfrank830 @joPO19942906 @BobPartridge16 @grok @BenKoby1911 @Hji45519156 @FreeSpeech4U_Me @JJ9621073059835 @priscian @Devonian1342 @jgatta06 @TypicalDeviant @isaacscradle @ClimateRetorts @RobertWager1 @hannon_renee @RixAutomatedMat @DaleGribble_666 @GeorgeJeff9804 @roger_clague @GillesnFio @Joe_Public2018 @ClimatePoet @EthonRaptor I've done this multiple times, but you don't read. Feldman DR, Collins WD, Gero PJ, Torn MS, Mlawer EJ, Shippert TR. Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010. Nature. 2015;519(7543)
The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/VNcxS68lnj #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 https://t.co/I7GKkjbnky
@SchneidGabriel @jrockstrom 1) https://t.co/iQiIAOWouQ - mostly this one 2) https://t.co/dpVHE8cDxr and there is a lot of papers... They are complicated so it's better to focus on something easier 3) https://t.co/SgOQy1xlVW
@rln_nelson @MLeiter42 @Kenneth72712993 @phlannelphysics @ammocrypta @dafalgoutDennis @craigthomler @evenminded512 @WHPAAD @Frnc_prep @patfrank830 @joPO19942906 @BobPartridge16 @grok @BubbasRanch @BenKoby1911 @Hji45519156 @FreeSpeech4U_Me @Mark_A_Lunn @jimdtweet @WayneAllanH @ladyspat1 @Michael_D_Crow @JJ9621073059835 @priscian @LexWaters7 @Devonian1342 @JamesAbbott2013 @TrixX306 @jgorman2424 @jgatta06 @ChrisBBacon3 @TypicalDeviant @isaacscradle @CDCollins5269 @ClimateRetorts @RobertWager1 @hannon_renee @RixAutomatedMat @DaleGribble_666 @GeorgeJeff9804 @roger_clague @GillesnFio @Joe_Public2018 @ClimatePoet @EthonRaptor @dantrimont @Quentin__France @PoeBrianL @ilovekiirth Here are three tests already conducted: 1. Stips et al 2016. https://t.co/SvYbzN76LX 2. Feldman et al 2015. doi:10.1038/nature14240 3. Kramer et al 2021. https://t.co/tmQM2pNH55
@DarsenDavid @kissingtruth @TWTThisIsNow @AtomsksSanakan @Wim_Ondewhybak_ @NdabaningiMoyo @PoyetPatrice @CymaticWave @RobThomas14 @Konrad_Chapman @LxxResearcher @DoubleDumas @priscian @ICcrapdaily @HeidlerNeal @DarrenDrpage @ClimateRetorts @BrknMan @ejwwest @agentsinaction @BoryanLeChat @patfrank830 @Pow_Pop_Blam @mic12052 @covid_quest @Frnc_prep @hairymarx1 @ericonthetrail @bobathon @Dooderoo @25_cycle @WHUT @cohler @JoernWiedemann @Redoubtably10 @BStarr96522 @GeraldKutney @OceanadeSilva Add other direct observational work Feldman et al 2015 https://t.co/lllG0TlXLP Feldman et al 2018 https://t.co/mvLYd3ILk0 Kramer et al 2021 https://t.co/GfMdkP22hl Whitburn et al 2021 https://t.co/Zu6gTQBqW3 Teixeira et al 2024 https://t.co/98SfyBuJbf
The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/VNcxS67NxL #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 https://t.co/I7GKkjaPv0
The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/VNcxS67NxL #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 https://t.co/I7GKkjaPv0
@LotisteCompe @LSA_888 @AssoClimatoReal Vous pouvez aussi vous référer à des études sur la période actuelle, qui s'appuient sur des mesures plus directes des phénomènes physiques, par ex. : Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 - Feldman et al., 2015 https://t.co/NlE7hBLSjo
@rln_nelson @JimBowersclimb GHE in the real world https://t.co/8RvJgHjs8o
@dafalgoutDennis @patfrank830 @Michael_D_Crow @Frnc_prep @jimdtweet @BobPartridge16 @BubbasRanch @Kenneth72712993 @JJ9621073059835 @LexWaters7 @ladyspat1 @FreeSpeech4U_Me @PushFourLeft @Devonian1342 @craigthomler @JamesAbbott2013 @TrixX306 @Mark_A_Lunn @ammocrypta @jgorman2424 @jgatta06 @ChrisBBacon3 @MLeiter42 @TypicalDeviant @isaacscradle @WHPAAD @priscian @CDCollins5269 @phlannelphysics @BenKoby1911 @ClimateRetorts @WayneAllanH @RobertWager1 @hannon_renee @RixAutomatedMat @DaleGribble_666 @GeorgeJeff9804 @roger_clague @kevpluck @GillesnFio @Joe_Public2018 @ClimatePoet @EthonRaptor @dantrimont @Quentin__France @PoeBrianL @ilovekiirth @IBergwiesel @jpgcrowley @NoelTurner194 Observations at the surface: [3] Feldman DR, Collins WD, Gero PJ, Torn MS, Mlawer EJ, Shippert TR. Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010. Nature. 2015;519(7543):339‐343. do
The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/VNcxS67NxL #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 https://t.co/I7GKkjaPv0
@NoJab69 @AssoClimatoReal C'est faux, l'existence de l'effet de serre et le rôle du CO2 sont tous deux démontrés scientifiquement (AR6, 2021). Voici un exemple de mesures : Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 - Feldman et al., 2015 https://t.co/NlE7hBLktQ https://t.co/cd9AqNU0tS
@Aletheia_______ @AssoClimatoReal Peut-être que ce n'est pas clair pour vous, il faut cliquer sur le lien (en bleu généralement) pour accéder à l'article : Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 - Feldman et al., 2014 https://t.co/NlE7hBLktQ Comprenez-vous ?
@Aletheia_______ @AssoClimatoReal Non, c'est un phénomène bien connu, démontré scientifiquement et même mesuré : Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 - Feldman et al., 2014 https://t.co/NlE7hBLktQ Concernant la concentration en CO2 : https://t.co/CHyPRM1IKD
The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/SGt9gu2ivR #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 https://t.co/MaKuCXQxBg
RT @bobhillbrain: The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/SGt9gu2ivR #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #Clim…
The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/SGt9gu2ivR #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 https://t.co/MaKuCXQxBg
@Narkophobia The study I was commenting on was the study YOU linked to: Feldman et al (2015) "Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010" which specifically states that its conclusion is an attribution. That is NOT empirical cause effect evidnece.
The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/SGt9gu2Qlp #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 https://t.co/MaKuCXR5qO
RT @ItsTheAtmospher: @BenjaminYumi8 @25_cycle @ryankatzrosene pseudoscience meme's and quotes out of context prove nothing I can validate…
@BenjaminYumi8 @25_cycle @ryankatzrosene pseudoscience meme's and quotes out of context prove nothing I can validate Tyndall (1861) on my lab bench; you do not know spectroscopy here is correlation - 485m years worth Judd etal (2024) DOI 10.1126/science.adk3705 Feldman etal (2015) DOI 10.1038/nature14240 https://t.co/wJAe6cziTv
RT @bobhillbrain: The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/SGt9gu2ivR #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #Clim…
The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/SGt9gu2ivR #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 https://t.co/MaKuCXQxBg
RT @ItsTheAtmospher: @25_cycle @bannister_jimbo @hausfath hey slackjaw ... look it up - Feldman etal (2015) Observational determination o…
@25_cycle @bannister_jimbo @hausfath hey slackjaw ... look it up - Feldman etal (2015) Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 DOI 10.1038/nature14240 https://t.co/g7VNR4MS46
@FreeSpeech4U_Me @WHPAAD @Kenneth72712993 @ClimateRetorts @TrixX306 @WayneAllanH @MLeiter42 @Michael_D_Crow @JJ9621073059835 @BobPartridge16 @jimdtweet @craigthomler @priscian @JamesAbbott2013 @PushFourLeft @dafalgoutDennis @RobertWager1 @ChrisBBacon3 @nxgrs73 @isaacscradle @BubbasRanch @CDCollins5269 @LexWaters7 @phlannelphysics @TypicalDeviant @Mark_A_Lunn @BenKoby1911 @hannon_renee @RixAutomatedMat @DaleGribble_666 @GeorgeJeff9804 @roger_clague @kevpluck @Devonian1342 @jgatta06 @GillesnFio @Joe_Public2018 @jgorman2424 @ClimatePoet @EthonRaptor @dantrimont @Quentin__France @PoeBrianL @ilovekiirth @IBergwiesel @jpgcrowley @NoelTurner194 @TheDickKnightV2 Take an IR sensor and point it at the sky on a clear night. Compare the results to this. Educate yourself. https://t.co/Jta0tejnU3
@pdxraj @k9cbw @OcklestonG @johnkrichards @garyzaroski1 @TruthHurtsDemz @bannister_jimbo @ProLibertateCH @AFCBOldgit @_ClimateCraze Then try this. Feldman DR, Collins WD, Gero PJ, Torn MS, Mlawer EJ, Shippert TR. Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010. Nature. 2015;519(7543):339‐343. doi:10.1038/nature1424
The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/SGt9gu2Qlp #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 https://t.co/MaKuCXR5qO
@bannister_jimbo @pdxraj @TruthHurtsDemz @ProLibertateCH @AFCBOldgit @_ClimateCraze 2/ This uses observations from the surface in two location over 10 years. Feldman DR et al Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010. Nature. 2015;519(7543):339‐343. doi:10.1038/nature14240 https://t.co/2zHZUlpNlK https://t.co/UxLB0Ah2WR
@ryankatzrosene To add some others Feldman et al 2015 https://t.co/lllG0TmvBn Feldman et al 2018 https://t.co/mvLYd3Jj9y Kramer et al 2021 https://t.co/GfMdkP2A6T Whitburn et al 2021 https://t.co/Zu6gTQBYLB Raghuraman et al 2023 https://t.co/Grxf2qQSxS Teixeira et al 2024 https://t.co/98SfyBvh0N
The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/VNcxS68lnj #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 https://t.co/I7GKkjbnky
@bannister_jimbo @NewPositivism @_ClimateCraze @4tis @CPochari2 @PoyetPatrice @misterduncan @TruthSeeker223 The paper is here. Feldman DR, Collins WD, Gero PJ, Torn MS, Mlawer EJ, Shippert TR. Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by C02 from 2000 to 2010. Nature. 2015;519(7543):339-343. doi:10.1038/nature14240
RT @bobhillbrain: The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/SGt9gu2Qlp #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #Clim…
The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/SGt9gu2Qlp #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 https://t.co/MaKuCXR5qO
@ChCo32689983 @MacLesggy Par exemple, pour ce qui concerne le forçage radiatif associé au CO2 : Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 - Feldman et al., 2015 https://t.co/NlE7hBLSjo Figure : "Change in effective radiative forcing from 1750 to 2019" (AR6, 2021) https://t.co/YKhaMe9TdS
@ElleFlanan @AssoClimatoReal @MacLesggy Les preuves de l'origine anthropique du réchauffement climatique ne se limitent pas aux modélisations. Elles s'appuient sur des mesures. Par exemple : Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 - Feldman et al., 2015 https://t.co/NlE7hBLSjo https://t.co/nSGmIumdyO
@JCohidon @AssoClimatoReal L'origine anthropique du réchauffement climatique actuel est démontrée par un ensemble de preuves scientifiques (cf. AR6, 2021). Par exemple : Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 - Feldman et al., 2015 https://t.co/NlE7hBLSjo https://t.co/MkGZ3AZiM7
@ORignier @AssoClimatoReal C'est faux : les mesures actuelles du forçage radiatif et les données paléoclimatiques démontrent que le CO2 joue un rôle sur le climat terrestre. Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 - Feldman et al., 2015 https://t.co/NlE7hBLktQ
@morri64189 @PsychedeliaSmi4 @SaraWheeler22 @mrmarkdolan Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 | Nature https://t.co/ez40f05ZBx
The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/VNcxS67NxL #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 https://t.co/I7GKkjaPv0
The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/VNcxS67NxL #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 https://t.co/I7GKkjaPv0
RT @AtomsksSanakan: PapersOfTheDay On carbon dioxide (CO2) absorbing energy in the atmosphere: "The spectral signature of recent climate…
The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/VNcxS67NxL #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 https://t.co/I7GKkjaPv0
@bannister_jimbo @TruthSeeker223 @_ClimateCraze [1] Feldman DR et al. Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by C02 from 2000 to 2010. Nature. 2015,519(7543):339-343. doi:10.1038/nature14240 https://t.co/gQcj3tvpMx r6/qt3428vir 6_noSplash_b5903aebfe105b4071103e11197138f8.pdf
@DarrenDrpage @rwerkh @patfrank830 @SchneidGabriel @PoyetPatrice @ejwwest @kissingtruth @DoubleDumas @Rebecca74083947 @JimBowersclimb @alangnixon @kevhof52 @COrepKdeGraaf @FredHikes @military_1776 @TWTThisIsNow @GlonvecHQ @BrknMan @RCownie @Proemed45 @ICcrapdaily @ClimateRetorts @Konrad_Chapman @LxxResearcher @CymaticWave @BarbaraGirouard @HmGinYYC @priscian @SGMTrailbuilder @NdabaningiMoyo @HeidlerNeal @agentsinaction @dsjost @BoryanLeChat @EdWellham @AtomsksSanakan @Pow_Pop_Blam @mic12052 @MikeHudema @MichaelEMann CO2 is a well mixed gas fairly rapidly in No Hemisphere Check the work of Feldman et al Nature 519:339-343 2015 https://t.co/lllG0TmvBn Note the difficulty, so Barrow, Alaska chosen with low humidity and clear sky conditions used to improve signal-to-noise
The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/VNcxS67NxL #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 https://t.co/I7GKkjaPv0
The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/VNcxS68lnj #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 https://t.co/I7GKkjbnky
The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/SGt9gu2ivR #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 https://t.co/MaKuCXQxBg
The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/SGt9gu2ivR #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 https://t.co/MaKuCXQxBg
@Kenneth72712993 @BubbasRanch @jimdtweet @Mark_A_Lunn @Michael_D_Crow @phlannelphysics @isaacscradle @3GHtweets @JimFish56837379 @Veritatem2021 @ClimatePoet @BlasphemousBan1 @AndryGiles @aSinister @IBergwiesel @RstrixxX @jgorman2424 @d_e_mol @NoelTurner194 @priscian @WitnessIAm @JusticeTrudeau @Trudy72842064 @LibsOwner @TullimonstrumC @automatrix66_KC @Stephen90045069 @ejwwest @FriendsOScience @WilliamNB @MathewMoisture @CryptoPaul68_2 @jwickers @Gordon_DHG @weather_talk @w44xc555 @SGMTrailbuilder @GoodCollie @ScienceJustWins @Robert76907841 @RegimeChangeBC @nougatjesus @MrTholian @bobathon Here's observational evidence for the GHE at the surface. Feldman DR, Collins WD, Gero PJ, Torn MS, Mlawer EJ, Shippert TR. Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010. Nature. 2015;519(7543):339‐343. doi:10.1038/nature14240
The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/SGt9gu2ivR #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 https://t.co/MaKuCXQxBg
The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/VNcxS68lnj #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 https://t.co/I7GKkjbnky
The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/SGt9gu2ivR #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 https://t.co/MaKuCXQxBg
The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/SGt9gu2ivR #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 https://t.co/MaKuCXQxBg
@Haosou1 @wideawake_media "No one has yet shown that human emissions of carbon dioxide drive global warming" Easy: https://t.co/DfXbLSE1BI
@SpeddingCharlie @SecEnlightUK @AllisonPearson "David, show us the evidence that CO2 has any effect on the climate." https://t.co/DfXbLSEzrg Next!
@NarzekajacyN @RZbycho Nie bzdury, tylko ich własne badania. Zobacz sobie choćby, jakie są zakresy na aerozolach (10.1080/01431161.2022.2045042) albo chmurach (10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0753.1). ±8.7W/m2 na chmurach. Ile razy w to wciśniesz CO2? Po cztery razy w każdą stronę (1.82W/m2 – 10.1038/nature14240).
@MarcusFergus6 @rowandean Here's is the paper you'll ignore which disproves your claim that there are no papers. You'll probably respond with 47 memes. "Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010" https://t.co/mI0DSw5YGN
@DanielSchiefe10 @schuetterbuali @letztegenAT Was genau verstehst du nicht an: "Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010"?
RT @R18Jcs: @cohler Cohler - just another idiot with an opinion and no support. #ClimateBrawl “Observational determination of surface ra…
@cohler Cohler - just another idiot with an opinion and no support. #ClimateBrawl “Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010" https://t.co/u12u9G74qa “Observational Evidence of Increasing Global Radiative Forcing” https://t.co/bnCeJnT8qM
The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/SGt9gu2ivR #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 https://t.co/MaKuCXQxBg
The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/SGt9gu2ivR #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 https://t.co/MaKuCXQxBg
@patfrank830 @craigthomler @DeadheadJP99 @LxxResearcher @AtomsksSanakan @grumpynskeptic @DawnTJ90 @priscian @Bob99292956 @EdBohman @FireFox_XB9R @DougBookwriter2 @ILuvCO2 @dan613 @AltUS_ARC @PACleanwater @ThomasPaine5 @SteveSGoddard @MLBinWA @Robin_Hagues @RoyPentland @Boi_dBoi_d @bjames280961 @_kevinmartin @mytk56 @gjbangar @gershuni @Dcoronata @IngersolRobert @EdDarrell @CMH19611 @ChrisMartzWX @Greg49039425 @milneorchid @bfolson18 @JohnPalkovic @TADinKaty @PlanetLuvie @ClimateRealists @BradSchrag @Forthwithtx @DrMarkImisides @david_hanselman @amidgley @miked194765 Meanwhile back on planet earth: "Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010" Feldman et al 2015 https://t.co/1dFkk1yymP
@TedVerwey @craigthomler @DeadheadJP99 @LxxResearcher @AtomsksSanakan @grumpynskeptic @DawnTJ90 @priscian @Bob99292956 @EdBohman @FireFox_XB9R @DougBookwriter2 @ILuvCO2 @dan613 @AltUS_ARC @PACleanwater @ThomasPaine5 @SteveSGoddard @MLBinWA @Robin_Hagues @RoyPentland @Boi_dBoi_d @bjames280961 @_kevinmartin @mytk56 @gjbangar @gershuni @Dcoronata @IngersolRobert @EdDarrell @CMH19611 @ChrisMartzWX @Greg49039425 @milneorchid @bfolson18 @JohnPalkovic @TADinKaty @PlanetLuvie @ClimateRealists @BradSchrag @Forthwithtx @DrMarkImisides @david_hanselman @amidgley @miked194765 Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 Feldman et al 2015 https://t.co/1dFkk1yymP
The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/VNcxS67NxL #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 https://t.co/I7GKkjaPv0
@EcoSenseNow More non-peer reviewed garbage in a pay to publish junk journal. Typical of the pseudo science peddled by Moore and the rest of the rats at CO2 Coalition. “Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010" Feldman et al https://t.co/u12u9G74qa
@JimBowersclimb @BillFredericco @25_cycle @violin4all @GeraldKutney @MortonBalthus while everyone argues thermodynamics (which is important) spectroscopy drives the 'why' Feldman etal (2015) Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 DOI 10.1038/nature14240 https://t.co/geE0ZR6sZu
The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/SGt9gu2ivR #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 https://t.co/MaKuCXQxBg
The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/SGt9gu2ivR #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 https://t.co/MaKuCXQxBg
@BurgessPark2 You don't believe in the models so why show you them.?? https://t.co/Jw0mnIX1ra
@BurgessPark2 One paper is not enough to build a scientific theory upon...and you will dismiss the thousands of papers that show C02 is the driver. Your paper is modelling....I can show you lots of papers that show C02 is the driver through observation and modelling.https://t.co/Jw0mnIX1ra
@navigator087 @Rabs1958 @GillesnFio @Anymous84861064 @Veritatem2021 @Devonian1342 @MarcEHJones @GAJAJW @BenKoby1911 @Jaisans @bulkbiker @Climatehope2 @DenisDaly @S_D_Mannix @Data79504085 @Mark_A_Lunn @Anvndarnamn5 @Michael_D_Crow @Hji45519156 @waxliberty @ncdave4life @priscian @SuperFoxyLoxy @ChrisBBacon3 @JaapTitulaer @Willard1951 @wjack76995 @Rocky35418823 @NobaconEgbert @balls95652097 @BointonGiles @AristotleMrs @ammocrypta @SeekerTheGreat1 @ubique60 @EthonRaptor @RMcgillss @paligap17 @TheDisproof @MaggieL @Willy1000 @AuroriaTwittori @3GHtweets @MartinJBern @gstrandberg1 @Jakegsm @EricWil06256732 clearly your having issues adjusting your IR Spec... this should help Feldman etal (2015) Observational Determination of Surface Radiative Forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 DOI 10.1038/nature14240 https://t.co/sY6zTlNFPj
The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/SGt9gu2ivR #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 https://t.co/MaKuCXQxBg
@DaleCloudyman What a clown. #ClimateActionNow #ClimateBrawl Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010" Feldman et al 2015 https://t.co/EKnxiuSAOw Observational Evidence of Increasing Global Radiative Forcing Kramer et al 2021 https://t.co/lhx6PKmE4o
@VirgilJiyu @AssoClimatoReal @futurasciences Vous avez affirmé que la tectonique n'était pas prise en compte sans apporter ensuite de preuves. Pour le rôle du CO2, voici un exemple de mesures : Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 - Feldman et al., 2015 https://t.co/NlE7hBLktQ
The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/SGt9gu2ivR #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 https://t.co/MaKuCXQxBg
@akaelwopo1 @peterjwever @JusperMachogu We can..it's been observed and it matches models https://t.co/Jw0mnIX1ra
The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/VNcxS67NxL #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 https://t.co/I7GKkjaPv0
@deltablues11 No, you're just being lazy.. but here you are. Enjoy more evidence of AGW https://t.co/Jw0mnIX1ra
@Marcus78216830 - "I’m a scientist"
RT @bobhillbrain: The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/SGt9gu2ivR #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #Clim…
The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/SGt9gu2ivR #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 https://t.co/MaKuCXQxBg
@DaeminErish @Fakten007 @UNEP @theGEF The increase in atmospheric C02 is not logarithmic...why do people completely misinterpret basic physics
The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/SGt9gu2ivR #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 https://t.co/MaKuCXQxBg
The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/VNcxS67NxL #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 https://t.co/I7GKkjaPv0
The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/SGt9gu2ivR #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 https://t.co/MaKuCXQxBg
RT @bobhillbrain: The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/SGt9gu2ivR #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #Clim…
The increase of energy store is boosting #ClimateCatastrophe https://t.co/SGt9gu2ivR #GlobalWarming #ClimateChange #ClimateCrisis Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010 https://t.co/MaKuCXQxBg
RT @ItsTheAtmospher: @FreeSpeech4U_Me @Bostons80113133 @NatalieCarmody @ZombiePiano @karleastlondon @Calltoart @GeraldKutney @OscarsWild1 @…
RT @ItsTheAtmospher: @FreeSpeech4U_Me @Bostons80113133 @NatalieCarmody @ZombiePiano @karleastlondon @Calltoart @GeraldKutney @OscarsWild1 @…
@FreeSpeech4U_Me @Bostons80113133 @NatalieCarmody @ZombiePiano @karleastlondon @Calltoart @GeraldKutney @OscarsWild1 @Data79504085 @LabourOutOfScot @JustinTemplerSr @ScienceBlog3 @CanadianSence @aSinister @EnoNevarraw @Fossil_Herb @w_koppen @S_Metzeler @FredHikes @shafercw @craigthomler @BobPartridge16 @emilio97493490 @25_cycle @snarkfiend @6lennybravo @DawnJT90 @_nwblacksmith @OzzmanOsgood @USAMRIID_CA @nonsequiturmeme @ZorikaZr @GaryNicholls52 @CDCollins5269 @BrknMan @CorrectThyAre @benmooreau @SRT298 @FBreject1 @Daveh5274 @Rosie45703313 @GerdtzW @Royalacresrod @ejwwest @RonRessler3 @Veritatem2021 @ammocrypta @KeillerDon @JimBowersclimb @HailFromTheVoid wrong wrong wrong ... Historical Fourier (1827) (hyp) Foote (1857) (exp) Tyndall (1861) (lab exp) Arrrhenius (1896) (EBM) Recent Feldman etal (2015) DOI 10.1038/nature14240 Rae etal (2021, 2023) DOI 10.1146/annurev-earth-082420-06302
@MikeSniderEngr They don't... maybe you misunderstand radiative forcing https://t.co/Jw0mnIX1ra
@Michellesince66 @ClimateRealists We have directly observed C02's greenhouse effect https://t.co/Jw0mnIX1ra
@BobPartridge16 @GrahamLKeegan Bob who the fuck are you to be making such claims? Quantify this liar: https://t.co/hpkvZZUIwW
@MAGAneer @Diver_Flemming @JunkScience Wrong. Do tell me what happens to global mean temperature without atmospheric C02. The ocean does not interact with photons like a suspended molocule of C02 does
@TheTo6924 @GrahamLKeegan It's based on thermodynamics. Unless you don't believe in the observed radiative effect of molecules? https://t.co/Jw0mnIX1ra
@RealLucjusz @socratesccost https://t.co/Jw0mnIX1ra here is the full paper and I have included the discussion from the article regards how measurement was achieved https://t.co/rGIpA0zAxt
@SnorbertZangox @OhmGohm21 @RARohde @FelipeCamGom I sent you the link before https://t.co/Pal3XFTFGQ
@SnorbertZangox @RARohde @FelipeCamGom Just add the doi-link of the study on scihub, it will be unlocked https://t.co/Pal3XFTFGQ
@JimBlack48 @EdmundWakeford @Kenneth72712993 The report conclusions point was that you haven’t cited a single paper which is REPORT CONCLUSIONS, i.e. peer review. Not your stupid climate denial blogs you inbred. I mean I already cited the evidence here: https://t.co/hpkvZZUIwW If you dodge it again I’ll just block you.
@buerger18 @RPWester @ChristofFiedle1 @szteffienchen Das hat jetzt was genau mit ideologisch nicht genehm zu tun? Es gibt übrigens auch andere Wege, die Wirkung von CO2 auf unsere Athmosphäre zu beobachten. Schon 2015 konnte man den Treibhauseffekt im Außenklima nachweisen. https://t.co/26i19Edj6l
@thehappyend5596 @Silvio2787 @foersterjoerg @VQuaschning 1. https://t.co/cEImtqFzCU und https://t.co/AmtljSWqXs 2. In der Grafik geht es um Emissionen und nicht um den CO2 Gehalt. Großer Unterschied. 3. https://t.co/REwLtHqEyr Findest du in Section 7.4
@WitekD @Matt30491354 @szymon_holownia Dowodów doświadczalnych jest mnóstwo. Pierwszy przykład z brzegu https://t.co/gU3v66GXbP Jesteś zbyt głupi, by to zrozumieć.
@Micha99413929 @Kamil57130417 @jakubwiech @GnasKg @DomowySurvival @PogodaMeteo https://t.co/e22RHqzYy1 https://t.co/iQiIAOWouQ do tego trzeba mieć na uwadze, że para wodna jest wzmacniającym czynnikiem https://t.co/bY8gZczyQy
RT @ItsTheAtmospher: @MitchP85D @JunkScience early work Fourier (~1830) Foote (1857) simple experiments Tyndall (1861) bench measurements…
@MitchP85D @JunkScience early work Fourier (~1830) Foote (1857) simple experiments Tyndall (1861) bench measurements all gases Arrhenius (1896) Energy Balance Model modern work Feldman (2015) Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 - 2000 to 2010 DOI 10.1038/nature14240 https://t.co/yetAslmeEJ
@Knaning1 @RonStoop1 Nou, zijn we het daarover eens. Als je het artikel leest (zie: https://t.co/KQDzKhJsiQ) dan zie je ook dat ze daar *metingen* hebben gedaan van de transmissie afname voor de golflengte van CO2, die correspondeert met toename van CO2 in de atmosfeer. dat is dus empirisch bewijs.
@TheMagusX @MikeHudema its right here https://t.co/AmtljSVT7U https://t.co/XlrM3NA7O9
@DawnWhistler711 @MikeHudema i got you https://t.co/AmtljSVT7U https://t.co/69HgR2QTCW
@PkrBum @MikeHudema of course there is https://t.co/AmtljSVT7U https://t.co/Z2hn7VaqtS
3) występuje nasycenie dla CO2 - możemy władować więcej i nie będzie cieplej. Jak to możliwe? Przecież CO2 jest więcej i mamy publikacje pokazujące co innego np. https://t.co/TYpEN8KxiE .
@roger_clague @NoelTurner194 @phlannelphysics @jimdtweet @PeterGi08603862 @3GHtweets @jpgcrowley @BobPartridge16 @evenminded121 @LexWaters7 @aSinister @Rebecca74083947 @nxgrs73 @MartinJBern @DaleGribble_666 @jgorman2424 @cmcateer3 @PushFourLeft @TheOmeg55211733 @NikolovScience @AndryGiles @USAMRIID_CA @FredHikes @RandomRation @Mark_A_Lunn @tor_lan @4tis @PvtMcAuslan @ejwwest @FeelingWearing @DavidAHoward @MartinW93129709 @RogTallbloke @priscian @enviro_knight @Robban_Pe @BrknMan @JusticeTrudeau @theOGTaipan @IBergwiesel @sjsimmons @ClimatePoet @RstrixxX @WitnessIAm @Trudy72842064 @1000Frolly oh goodness - very very very wrong .... but I'll let the science tell the tale ! Lacis etal (2010) DOI 10.1126/science.1190653 Feldman etal (2015) DOI 10.1038/nature14240 Lenoble (1985) Radiative Transfer in Scattering and Absorbing Atmos. ISBN 978-0-12-451451-5 https://t.co/hxEVaAPI9c
@nxgrs73 @jimdtweet @phlannelphysics @PeterGi08603862 @3GHtweets @roger_clague @NoelTurner194 @jpgcrowley @BobPartridge16 @evenminded121 @LexWaters7 @aSinister @Rebecca74083947 @MartinJBern @DaleGribble_666 @jgorman2424 @cmcateer3 @PushFourLeft @TheOmeg55211733 @NikolovScience @AndryGiles @USAMRIID_CA @FredHikes @RandomRation @Mark_A_Lunn @tor_lan @4tis @PvtMcAuslan @ejwwest @FeelingWearing @DavidAHoward @MartinW93129709 @RogTallbloke @priscian @enviro_knight @Robban_Pe @BrknMan @JusticeTrudeau @theOGTaipan @IBergwiesel @sjsimmons @ClimatePoet @RstrixxX @WitnessIAm @Trudy72842064 @1000Frolly oh goodness ... very very very wrong .... but I'll let the science tell the tale ! Lacis etal (2010) DOI 10.1126/science.1190653 Feldman etal (2015) DOI 10.1038/nature14240 https://t.co/yMWT1nS5Uv
@nxgrs73 @jimdtweet @LexWaters7 @PeterGi08603862 @3GHtweets @roger_clague @phlannelphysics @NoelTurner194 @jpgcrowley @BobPartridge16 @evenminded121 @aSinister @Rebecca74083947 @MartinJBern @DaleGribble_666 @jgorman2424 @cmcateer3 @PushFourLeft @TheOmeg55211733 @NikolovScience @AndryGiles @USAMRIID_CA @FredHikes @RandomRation @Mark_A_Lunn @tor_lan @4tis @PvtMcAuslan @ejwwest @FeelingWearing @DavidAHoward @MartinW93129709 @RogTallbloke @priscian @enviro_knight @Robban_Pe @BrknMan @JusticeTrudeau @theOGTaipan @IBergwiesel @sjsimmons @ClimatePoet @RstrixxX @WitnessIAm @Trudy72842064 @1000Frolly oh goodness ... very very very wrong .... but I'll let the science tell the tale ! Lacis etal (2010) DOI 10.1126/science.1190653 Feldman etal (2015) DOI 10.1038/nature14240 https://t.co/831pEPiXrH
@Kamila77787389 @Cruithne09PL @JkmMikke @EdwardLeszczyk @paulina_anna_bo @DemencjuszX @p07730280 @MichaUrbanski21 @ArtNovakWek @albertyjon34 @Meggy73336095 @Maria55286820 @Radek57498144 @SmolarMaciej @Dawid44759033 @zygzak357 @Maciej46703755 @Kumkumen @T263235 @zelsta5312 1) https://t.co/ZE6mh5qT84 2) https://t.co/iQiIAOWWko a co to jest jak nie publikacje naukowe?
@phlannelphysics @aSinister @LexWaters7 @Rebecca74083947 @nxgrs73 @jpgcrowley @jimdtweet @MartinJBern @DaleGribble_666 @evenminded121 @jgorman2424 @cmcateer3 @PushFourLeft @TheOmeg55211733 @NikolovScience @AndryGiles @USAMRIID_CA @FredHikes @RandomRation @Mark_A_Lunn @NoelTurner194 @tor_lan @3GHtweets @4tis @PvtMcAuslan @ejwwest @FeelingWearing @roger_clague @DavidAHoward @MartinW93129709 @RogTallbloke @priscian @enviro_knight @Robban_Pe @BrknMan @JusticeTrudeau @theOGTaipan @IBergwiesel @sjsimmons @ClimatePoet @RstrixxX @WitnessIAm @Trudy72842064 oh your one of those WV, atmospheric overturning, molecular collision, classical mechanics folks ... suggest you start here Lacis etal (2010) DOI 10.1126/science.1190653 Feldman etal (2019) DOI 10.1038/nature14240
RT @ItsTheAtmospher: @LexWaters7 @aSinister @Rebecca74083947 @nxgrs73 @jpgcrowley @phlannelphysics @jimdtweet @MartinJBern @DaleGribble_666…
@LexWaters7 @aSinister @Rebecca74083947 @nxgrs73 @jpgcrowley @phlannelphysics @jimdtweet @MartinJBern @DaleGribble_666 @evenminded121 @jgorman2424 @cmcateer3 @PushFourLeft @TheOmeg55211733 @NikolovScience @AndryGiles @USAMRIID_CA @FredHikes @RandomRation @Mark_A_Lunn @NoelTurner194 @tor_lan @3GHtweets @4tis @PvtMcAuslan @ejwwest @FeelingWearing @roger_clague @DavidAHoward @MartinW93129709 @RogTallbloke @priscian @enviro_knight @Robban_Pe @BrknMan @JusticeTrudeau @theOGTaipan @IBergwiesel @sjsimmons @ClimatePoet @RstrixxX @WitnessIAm @Trudy72842064 that's your central thesis ? I'd start by finding the errors in 170+ years of evidence, experiment, modeling and reproduction of existing work but cut to the chase Lacis etal (2010) DOI 10.1126/science.1190653 Feldman etal (2019) DOI 10.1038/nature14240
@bartekschetyna @jakubwiech @Piotr932 @sjanus_pl Zmiana stężenia CO2 z 0.03% do 0.04% ma konkretny wpływ na zmianę bilansu radiacyjnego. Podstawy matematyczne w wersji skróconej masz tutaj https://t.co/SUntbb9TnM No i obserwujemy jak CO2 zmienia bilans radiacyjny https://t.co/TYpEN8KxiE Małe liczby od razu ignorujesz?
@andrewmac71 @TopAlliedAceWW1 @ammocrypta @DaleGribble_666 @WernerReinhard5 @fischerfischy @BenKoby1911 @Anvndarnamn5 @MarshallCd @gargantuandwarf @FredHikes @Willard1951 @Mark_A_Lunn @adlrope @ejwwest @ncdave4life @Devonian1342 @priscian @MatthewWielicki @Michael_D_Crow @safcpete67 @Climatehope2 @BJChippindale @S_D_Mannix @DenisDaly @JimBlack48 @AndersBrunstad2 @periodicaudio @JusticeTrudeau @glinch72 @Jaisans @stitchnstab @CarrudoDon @Veritatem2021 @LiveLifeBK24 @TheDisproof @AristotleMrs @Joeyd87745119 @Data79504085 @Hji45519156 @waxliberty @SuperFoxyLoxy @ChrisBBacon3 @JaapTitulaer @wjack76995 @Rocky35418823 @NobaconEgbert @balls95652097 you can jump ahead to field studies with Feldman etal (2015) DOI : 10.1038/nature14240 https://t.co/HZ6zNYux9F
@andrewmac71 @TopAlliedAceWW1 @ammocrypta @DaleGribble_666 @WernerReinhard5 @fischerfischy @BenKoby1911 @Anvndarnamn5 @MarshallCd @gargantuandwarf @FredHikes @Willard1951 @Mark_A_Lunn @adlrope @ejwwest @ncdave4life @Devonian1342 @priscian @MatthewWielicki @Michael_D_Crow @safcpete67 @Climatehope2 @BJChippindale @S_D_Mannix @DenisDaly @JimBlack48 @AndersBrunstad2 @periodicaudio @JusticeTrudeau @glinch72 @Jaisans @stitchnstab @CarrudoDon @Veritatem2021 @LiveLifeBK24 @TheDisproof @AristotleMrs @Joeyd87745119 @Data79504085 @Hji45519156 @waxliberty @SuperFoxyLoxy @ChrisBBacon3 @JaapTitulaer @wjack76995 @Rocky35418823 @NobaconEgbert @balls95652097 you can jump ahead to field studies with Feldman etal (2015) DOI : 10.1038/nature14240 https://t.co/ehy5eJzQsR
@foxdoom71 @Ceist8 @clim8resistance let's count you as a double dose denier ... we've known it was CO2 since experiments in 1856 recent work being Lacis etal (2010 and Feldman etal (2015) DOI 10.1126/science.1190653 & 10.1038/nature14240 respectively GMST is measured against a reference datum https://t.co/k7OR7Gq0Gm
@zukunft37 https://t.co/4UqIvdE2d2 Nicht nur der Ausgangstweet, sondern v.a. die Kommentare lassen einen wirklich am Verstand einiger zweifeln.
@Lukas18865903 @bobik314 @TPotapczyk @SebRoss4 2/2 eksperymentach,we wszystkich obliczeniach. I wszyscy będą udawać, że jest OK A każdy nowy fizyk na wydziale fizyki (na całym świecie) jest wtajemniczany, jak zdaje na fizykę To brzmi jak szuria A efekt cieplarniany został ZMIERZONY, np. tu https://t.co/tewdXCkhnf
@theappocalypso @3GHtweets @cmcateer3 @jimdtweet @NikolovScience @ejwwest @d_e_mol @roger_clague @evenminded121 @RoyPentland @AndryGiles @JamesHuckleber8 @IBergwiesel @phlannelphysics @aSinister @Mark_A_Lunn @sjsimmons @Veritatem2021 @Kenneth72712993 @fischerfischy @ClimatePoet @RstrixxX @jgorman2424 @Michael_D_Crow @NoelTurner194 @priscian @WitnessIAm @BubbasRanch @JusticeTrudeau @Trudy72842064 @RoelofBoer @LibsOwner @TullimonstrumC @automatrix66_KC @Stephen90045069 @FriendsOScience @WilliamNB @MathewMoisture @CryptoPaul68_2 @jwickers @RushhourP @Gordon_DHG @weather_talk @JimFish56837379 @w44xc555 @SGMTrailbuilder @GoodCollie @ScienceJustWins @Robert76907841 @RegimeChangeBC Evidence https://t.co/m75cJdh6yd
@Micha99413929 @jakubwiech Bo co może się wydarzyć? Czy możliwe jest że zmieni się bilans radiacyjny (co obserwujemy https://t.co/TYpEN8L58c )? I nawet inne eksperymenty pokazują, że takie coś na pewno ociepli planetę.
@ChairmanGC @mondschaf23 Der Nachweis ist die Tatsache, dass die CO2-Konzentration in der Atmosphäre seit der Industrialisierung um 50% gestiegen ist. Und dass CO2 dafür sorgt, dass sich die Erde erwärmt kann durch direkte Beobachtungen gemessen werden. https://t.co/AmtljSVT7U https://t.co/JNKl1AcvuK
@DanCady @25_cycle @ImigDerek @GretaThunberg great ... another one who thinks that its the "Sun" I really thought a hundred years + of study with Feldman (2015) recently would have buried that notion deep in the ground but no... someone keeps robbing the bloody grave Feldman etal (2015) doi:10.1038/nature14240
@Robert76907841 @Ice_See @latimeralder oooh ... someone want's empirical data ? Feldman etal (2015) may be a good start doi:10.1038/nature14240
@Kizomba4Ever @ErbVolker @MrsMertes Sie sollten Ihren eigenen Ratschlag befolgen und sich erneut ergebnisoffen mit dem Thema beschäftigen. Dann wüssten Sie eventuell, dass der Treibhauseffekt nicht nur im Labor nachgewiesen wurde, sondern auch durch direkte Beobachtungen. https://t.co/AmtljSVT7U https://t.co/KCIPGkJCye
@BartKorzen @jakubwiech @arturkomoter https://t.co/TYpEN8KxiE a tu masz bezpośrednią obserwację
@EMaxwell56 @SniemN @nonsequiturmeme @Kootenaybob0 @3GHtweets @FriendsOScience @Kenneth72712993 @Oliver9LH @philerator @Veritatem2021 @MikeDel21893959 @jimdtweet @aSinister @Devonian1342 @NoelTurner194 @ClimatePoet @TyotoRiffle @RandomRation @NomadicQuantum @priscian @Michael_D_Crow @IBergwiesel @ammocrypta @ItsTheAtmospher @BubbasRanch @TomWhatsoeverB @MartinJBern @automatrix66_KC @JimBowersclimb @JimFish56837379 @Data79504085 @miller_klein @Siriuslee1776 @UlaLomu @GWrightstone @d_e_mol @QuBuBrasil @Faktantarkast10 @TamikaMRobson @CDMarshall7 @Jeffrey75327765 @RushhourP @xerb1966 @TullimonstrumC @ClimateRealists @iBlatant @StevenMBelknap @RstrixxX @bluebirdpoopies @Youcantbeserio6 Feldman (2015) doi:10.1038/nature14240 from the abstract "Here we present observationally based evidence of clear-skyCO2 surface radiative forcing that is directly attributable to the increase, between 2000
RT @ItsTheAtmospher: @IBergwiesel @EMaxwell56 @nonsequiturmeme @Kootenaybob0 @3GHtweets @FriendsOScience @Kenneth72712993 @Oliver9LH @phile…
@IBergwiesel @EMaxwell56 @nonsequiturmeme @Kootenaybob0 @3GHtweets @FriendsOScience @Kenneth72712993 @Oliver9LH @philerator @Veritatem2021 @MikeDel21893959 @jimdtweet @SniemN @aSinister @Devonian1342 @NoelTurner194 @ClimatePoet @TyotoRiffle @RandomRation @NomadicQuantum @priscian @Michael_D_Crow @ammocrypta @BubbasRanch @TomWhatsoeverB @MartinJBern @automatrix66_KC @JimBowersclimb @JimFish56837379 @Data79504085 @miller_klein @Siriuslee1776 @UlaLomu @GWrightstone @d_e_mol @QuBuBrasil @Faktantarkast10 @TamikaMRobson @CDMarshall7 @Jeffrey75327765 @RushhourP @xerb1966 @TullimonstrumC @ClimateRealists @iBlatant @StevenMBelknap @RstrixxX @bluebirdpoopies @Youcantbeserio6 @joseph_postma its hard to imagine but he's managed to cherry pick from the abstract of one of the most consequential papers written in recent time Feldman etal (2015) doi:10.1038/nature14240 https://t.co/WHl5Xk0RDk
@EMaxwell56 @jimdtweet @3GHtweets @MikeDel21893959 @SniemN @aSinister @Kenneth72712993 @Devonian1342 @NoelTurner194 @ClimatePoet @TyotoRiffle @RandomRation @NomadicQuantum @priscian @Michael_D_Crow @nonsequiturmeme @Oliver9LH @IBergwiesel @ammocrypta @BubbasRanch @Veritatem2021 @TomWhatsoeverB @MartinJBern @automatrix66_KC @JimBowersclimb @JimFish56837379 @Data79504085 @miller_klein @Siriuslee1776 @FriendsOScience @UlaLomu @GWrightstone @d_e_mol @QuBuBrasil @Faktantarkast10 @TamikaMRobson @CDMarshall7 @Jeffrey75327765 @RushhourP @xerb1966 @TullimonstrumC @ClimateRealists @iBlatant @StevenMBelknap @RstrixxX @bluebirdpoopies @Youcantbeserio6 @joseph_postma @jwickers @Gordon_DHG suggest you read Feldman etal (2015) doi:10.1038/nature14240 as for ship board datasets, we have data from every US Submarine transit of the Arctic and for a number of years commerce vessels have carried on board
RT @ItsTheAtmospher: @SoCalObserver @JunkScience @Harry_Stevens ohhh ... your getting all "sciencey" on us maybe you read the title and n…
@SoCalObserver @JunkScience @Harry_Stevens ohhh ... your getting all "sciencey" on us maybe you read the title and not the paper itself, or maybe you didn't do a proper literature review or someone at Heartland suggested this as a convenient ploy ... or maybe no one told you about Feldman etal. doi:10.1038/nature14240 https://t.co/N47kMc3Wjn
@USAMRIID_CA @aSinister @FillmoreWhite @SniemN @jimdtweet @MikeDel21893959 @BubbasRanch @3GHtweets @Veritatem2021 @TomWhatsoeverB @Kenneth72712993 @MartinJBern @ClimatePoet @RandomRation @automatrix66_KC @JimBowersclimb @priscian @NoelTurner194 @ammocrypta @JimFish56837379 @Data79504085 @miller_klein @Siriuslee1776 @FriendsOScience @UlaLomu @GWrightstone @Devonian1342 @nonsequiturmeme @d_e_mol @QuBuBrasil @Michael_D_Crow @Faktantarkast10 @TamikaMRobson @IBergwiesel @CDMarshall7 @Jeffrey75327765 @RushhourP @xerb1966 @TullimonstrumC @ClimateRealists @iBlatant @StevenMBelknap @RstrixxX @bluebirdpoopies @Youcantbeserio6 @joseph_postma @jwickers @Gordon_DHG @BointonGiles @Doctordapp scream and shout with DOI in hand I'll always give out Feldman etal. (2015) doi:10.1038/nature14240
@MikeDel21893959 @SniemN @jimdtweet @BubbasRanch @3GHtweets @Veritatem2021 @TomWhatsoeverB @Kenneth72712993 @MartinJBern @ClimatePoet @RandomRation @FillmoreWhite @automatrix66_KC @JimBowersclimb @priscian @NoelTurner194 @ammocrypta @JimFish56837379 @Data79504085 @miller_klein @Siriuslee1776 @FriendsOScience @UlaLomu @GWrightstone @Devonian1342 @nonsequiturmeme @d_e_mol @QuBuBrasil @Michael_D_Crow @aSinister @Faktantarkast10 @TamikaMRobson @IBergwiesel @CDMarshall7 @Jeffrey75327765 @RushhourP @xerb1966 @TullimonstrumC @ClimateRealists @iBlatant @StevenMBelknap @RstrixxX @bluebirdpoopies @Youcantbeserio6 @joseph_postma @jwickers @Gordon_DHG @BointonGiles @Doctordapp feel free to provide data, method and DOI doi:10.1038/nature14240
@The_Krzysztof Jest zmiana bilansu radiacyjnego i dopiero gdy dojdzie do równowagi to można mówić, że się ociepliło o ileś C. A to że się zmienia bilans radiacyjny to obserwujemy https://t.co/TYpEN8KxiE
@j_jedrzejko @wiktorppp @Laweta2 @Neuropa_ https://t.co/TYpEN8KxiE "The time series both show statistically significant trends of 0.2 W m(-2) per decade"
@ClimateRetorts @25_cycle Incorrect, Ian The Feldman et al 2015 paper in Nature is 'up and running' https://t.co/lllG0TlXLP
@jbs2250 @hausfath The amount of downwelling radiation emitted by CO2 has been empirically observed and quantified, and it agrees well with theoretical predictions. https://t.co/goGqLmVGbc https://t.co/z8QmgXAdRl
@Rudi_Hofer1 @LRM_dietalkshow Gibt es also die strahlungsabsorbierenden Eigenschaften von CO2 nur im Treibhaus, nicht aber in der Atmosphäre? Wieso sollte das so sein? Übrigens: Der atmosphärische Treibhauseffekt wurde direkt beobachtet und nachgewiesen. https://t.co/AmtljSVT7U https://t.co/I7HBbwEp4w
@Roman96887059 @bobik314 @DominRutkowski @jakubwiech @LudwikOlczyk @Al54994906 Nie wiem, ale mają różne afiliacje ;) Jeden to Darren Feldman, drugi to Daniel Feldman. https://t.co/CyTy3NM3vT https://t.co/73SPh4B5hE
@Roman96887059 @DominRutkowski @PogodaMeteo @jakubwiech @LudwikOlczyk @Al54994906 1) https://t.co/dpVHE8cDxr znikomy, acz konkretny Który obserwujemy empirycznie https://t.co/iQiIAOWouQ "The time series both show statistically significant trends of 0.2 W m(-2) per decade" https://t.co/NmPMPUf0fa
@JFraterski @AdamPawlicki2 https://t.co/TYpEN8KxiE "The time series both show statistically significant trends of 0.2 W m(-2) per decade" szkoda że obserwujemy co innego A, tylko w chujowych pracach naukowych używa się "belief" :)
@Robban_Pe @petercowdell @jordanbpeterson https://t.co/3QPTcKRTr5 https://t.co/IQCrtxIuBg https://t.co/AmtljSWqXs
@The_Krzysztof @Neuropa_ @sawraf https://t.co/TYpEN8KxiE "The time series both show statistically significant trends of 0.2 W m(-2) per decade" Polecam pożyczyć kamerę termowizyjną https://t.co/vJ6KtyT7XY
@Patrycjusz14 @GrotowskiBlazej @RozekTom @jakubwiech @WWF_Polska @Greenpeace_PL @kawecki_maciej Zmiana stężenia gazów cieplarnianych zmienia bilans radiacyjny https://t.co/TYpEN8KxiE to obserwujemy https://t.co/dpVHE8cDxr wiemy jak działają gazy cieplarniane natomiast jak zmiana bilansu ociepla lub ochładza to kwestia czułości klimatu
@Stysz https://t.co/TYpEN8L58c "The time series both show statistically significant trends of 0.2 W m(-2) per decade (with respective uncertainties of ±0.06 W m(-2) per decade and ±0.07 W m(-2) per decade) and have seasonal ranges of 0.1-0.2 W m(-2)...
@c4msde @DKs_Besen @FeynmansMethod @florianaigner Gibt zu viele unterschiedliche Einflüsse. Die Rückstrahlung ist daher nur von theoretischer Bedeutung. Gibt m.W. auch nur eine einzige Arbeit dazu, die eine "Beobachtungsbestimmung" versucht: https://t.co/81M7YlQ192
@TPotapczyk @SebRoss4 2) https://t.co/RWHdFvqukW od końca 19 wieku wiemy o tym, że CO2 jest gazem cieplarnianymhttps://edibleschoolyard.org/resource/greenhouse-lab https://t.co/TYpEN8L58c obserwujemy bezpośrednio że zmienia się bilans radiacyjny https://t.co/dpVHE8dbmZ wiemy jak mocno wpływają g.c.
@WlGawronski @On58Greg 2) zmieniając stężenie gazów cieplarnianych trudno oczekiwać aby klimat się nie ocieplił. Aktualnie jesteśmy na +1C i ocieplamy o ok 0.2C na dekadę. Obserwujemy to bezpośrednio mierząc bilans radiacyjny z satelit. https://t.co/TYpEN8KxiE https://t.co/YVc7WFvKwQ
@Grzegor16298147 @Neuropa_ @kosik_md @Witam_Kuzwa Można wysłać satelitę, który mierzy ile promieniowania podczerwonego jest absorbowane i sprawdzać jak zmiana stężenia gazów cieplarnianych to zmienia. https://t.co/TYpEN8KxiE
@Redbinamon @n_nkci @pol_pilnujmy 2. CO2 jest gazem cieplarnianym i jak jest jego więcej zmienia to bilans radiacyjny i ociepla planetę https://t.co/TYpEN928ac
@JanKellerVIP @Neuropa_ @dafsio https://t.co/jC7FKLHDeR w tym wątku opisałem podstawy. Oczywiście wykresy to nie jest najlepszy dowód. Publikacje naukowe są lepsze. https://t.co/TYpEN8L58c tutaj obserwujemy jak zmienia się bilans radiacyjny w wyniku zmiany stężenia CO2
@Stysz @FluderRobert @Neuropa_ https://t.co/ynyZye8ctL https://t.co/TYpEN8L58c Gdyby co mogę poszukać i spróbować lepiej wytłumaczyć Sebastianie.
@RyanTroxelOFC @WWdz @Michal_Sawich @Tomek_B999 Znowu rzeczywistość mówi co innego niż Ty. Skąd czerpiesz wiedzę? Zmiana stężenia CO2 zmienia bilans radiacyjny >2W/m2 polecam też to https://t.co/TYpEN8KxiE https://t.co/w4outBr0L3
@WMarchewczyk bezpośrednio obserwujemy że ef. cieplarniany działa https://t.co/TYpEN8KxiE . A jak wątpisz w efekt cieplarniany to szkoda, że nie chodziłeś do dobrego liceum gdzie na fizyce eksperymentalnie byś to sprawdził. https://t.co/Y1VNozCJ9U
@DarekRoznerski @Neuropa_ @LBalcerowicz Łomatko jedyna. Dowód 1: CO2 pochodzenia antropogenicznego spowodowało zmianę klimatu. https://t.co/0yIVSlOvuc Dowód 2: ścisły związek wymuszeń radiacyjnych spowodowanych emisjami z akumulacją energii, podliczone z istotnościami statystycznymi. https://t.co/mW2PoHv8Vh
@DarekRoznerski @KrzyJod @LBalcerowicz A w jakim formacie byś chciał dowód? Mogą być publikacje naukowe na podstawie obserwacji efektów praw fizyki? 1) wiemy że to my zwiększyliśmy stężenie gazów cieplarnianych https://t.co/ZE6mh5qT84 2) i wiemy, że to ociepla planetę https://t.co/TYpEN8L58c https://t.co/EF5U2lvGIi
@SniemN @Jaisans @ShaMikaWhoSeeks @DenisDaly @JustThi30117912 @Veritatem2021 @AristotleMrs @glinch72 @S_D_Mannix @BointonGiles @TheDisproof @Ceist8 @heinsenberger @Climatehope2 @MaggieL @ChrisBBacon3 @Willy1000 @JimBowersclimb @Mark_A_Lunn @AuroriaTwittori @3GHtweets @RushhourP @MartinJBern @EthonRaptor @Willard1951 @Anvndarnamn5 @gstrandberg1 @ncdave4life @Jakegsm @ammocrypta @EricWil06256732 @DTGvmd @wille99 @PaulDFarrar @Data79504085 @Hji45519156 @KCTaz @Valja46Zhark5 @drochir_thonnuk @paulp1232 @ShroedingerBird @J0aquIm_B4rb0s4 @Sky48115666 @0Sundance @BradPKeyes @DoesThisW0rk @FD2you @TWTThisIsNow start here ... Feldman (2015) doi:10.1038/nature14240 https://t.co/HH0UPe9XVD
@CzeKuku2 @ZawiszaZly @DownunderTom 2. To że CO2 jest gazem cieplarnianym to możesz samemu sprawdzić. Obserwujemy, że coraz więcej energii absorbuje atmosfera w wyniku wzrostu stężenia CO2. https://t.co/TYpEN8KxiE
@Neuropa_ @MarekAdamJan1 @Gigantus198 @OliverHaussman @jakubwiech 2. CO2 jest gazem cieplarnianym. Jeżeli jest go więcej to lepiej absorbuje promieniowanie podczerwone i ociepla planetę. Co obserwujemy również https://t.co/TYpEN8KxiE
@jimdtweet @MikeDel21893959 @Mark_A_Lunn @aSinister @VerplaetseJef @3GHtweets @waxliberty @RstrixxX @Kenneth72712993 @EthonRaptor @TullimonstrumC @Gladeskat @Veritatem2021 @ejwwest @d_e_mol @Michael_D_Crow @BubbasRanch @jwickers @NoelTurner194 @Cris_Paunescu @Gordon_DHG @GZzyzyx @priscian @akaelwopo1 @RushhourP @Jeffrey75327765 @drochir_thonnuk @FriendsOScience @Trudy72842064 @RoelofBoer @LibsOwner @IBergwiesel @automatrix66_KC @AGWisScience @Stephen90045069 @ClimatePoet @robhon_ @WilliamNB @MathewMoisture @CryptoPaul68_2 @jgorman2424 @weather_talk @JimFish56837379 @w44xc555 @SGMTrailbuilder @MonkeyLuminous @GoodCollie @ScienceJustWins @RoyPentland Thanks Jim D. Is this a good start? https://t.co/KYAhZ996WI Not sure why the tweedle-dee guys couldn't be as mature as you.
RT @bobik314: @StefanB15944801 @k_matyszczak @tomaawroblewski Człowiek wydobywa i spala paliwa kopalne. Wiemy że zmiana stężenia CO2 w atmo…
@StefanB15944801 @k_matyszczak @tomaawroblewski Człowiek wydobywa i spala paliwa kopalne. Wiemy że zmiana stężenia CO2 w atmosferze to wina spalania paliw kopalnych https://t.co/ZE6mh5qliw i wiemy jak to zmienia bilans radiacyjny i ociepla planetę https://t.co/TYpEN8KxiE To Ty ignorujesz naukę jak płaskoziemcy :) https://t.co/wzxTc9Fsua
@StrachJacek @Neuropa_ @Cruithne09PL @jakubwiech A że CO2 to gaz cieplarniany i zmienia bilans radiacyjny to wiemy i mierzymy. Oprócz wykresu (ten w W/m2) mamy sporo badań np https://t.co/TYpEN928ac Jak zmiana bilansu zmienia temperaturę? Tutaj możesz wykorzystać swoją wiedzą o systemach dynamicznych i zachowaniu energii.
@Stysz @letsseeifyousee @Stanislawos @MariuszJagora @jakubwiech Polecam też https://t.co/TYpEN8L58c
@DawnTJ90 @GeraldKutney @Raffy_Roma @ScienceSense1st @top1percentile @rahmstorf Funny how you dismiss your own source when the information is inconvenient. No need for further experiments when we have observational evidence such as this: https://t.co/FrkI3iB99c
@JanNowak2019 @s21n @jakubwiech @bgraczak @Cruithne09PL Przecież to Ty powiedziałeś że CO2 ma inne widmo absorpcji w laboratorium i inne w atmosferze. https://t.co/TYpEN8KxiE a, my też badamy w atmosferze ;) Niezły fizyk z Ciebie XD
@RealLucjusz @Dejw09 @Libertarianin_ @Neuropa_ @FilipMelanchton "Twierdzenie, że co2 czymkolwiek steruje to religia, a nie nauka." - znowu kłamiesz https://t.co/TYpEN8L58c CO2 nadal ma widmo absorpcji. Nie wiem jak to sobie tłumaczysz wszystko, że przestał być gazem cieplarnianym, czy ma inne parametry niż ma?
@CzeKuku2 @Neuropa_ https://t.co/TYpEN8KxiE i wiemy, że zmieniając stężenie CO2 ociepla się klimat Pytanie pozostaje - dlaczego ludzie afiszujący się byciem po prawej stronie weryfikują informacje przez "czy to mi się podoba?" i nie są w stanie zmienić poglądów po zmierzeniu z faktami?
@tim_dunkerton Ummm I was simply sharing the definition of radiative forcing....so you knew how important the direct measurement of it as it relates to CO2 was and is. https://t.co/6f36CDYoB7
@tim_dunkerton Direct meaurement of radiative forcing. https://t.co/6f36CDYoB7 https://t.co/sh7ppVDkXT
@tadeusz007 @Neuropa_ @Faust58570029 @Nezumek1 @PiotrWiel Jeżeli chcesz argumenty za tym, że to człowiek odpowiada za ocieplenie klimatu, to wystarczą 2 badania naukowe: 1) https://t.co/TYpEN8KxiE 2) https://t.co/ZE6mh5qliw
@ddziektarz @RobertR39614763 @Neuropa_ @AM_Zukowska https://t.co/TYpEN8KxiE obserwujemy jak zmienia się bilans radiacyjny (ile mniej energii ucieka od Ziemi) w wyniku zmiany stężenia gazów cieplarnianych
@s_of_rohan I have trouble considering that your this clueless but and both @25_cycle and @TheDisproof will certainly have other citations feel free to start with Feldman etal. doi:10.1038/nature14240 and this gem of graphic work product (from @25_cycle) https://t.co/QhXzUcpmpt
@Art44271697 @Neuropa_ @lelouch_420 @NonsenseFlat @jakubwiech https://t.co/Atrfl4FlUK https://t.co/TYpEN8KxiE bezpośrenio obserwujemy jak zmiana stężenia CO2 zmienia bilans radiacyjny (są też inne gazy cieplarniane)
@TajemniczyDon @jakubwiech 1) https://t.co/TYpEN8KxiE 2) https://t.co/ZE6mh5qliw Te 2 badania są wystarczającymi podstawami GO.
@rafalmacura_pl @MarcinKrlikows1 @kawecki_maciej @Neuropa_ @jakubwiech Jeżeli potrafisz myśleć to widząc taką samą ilość energii, która dociera ze Słońca, to byś wnioskował że temp (średn. globalna) powinna być taka sama. Natomiast średnia temperatura rośnie z cyklu słon. na cykl https://t.co/TYpEN8KxiE zobacz też sobie na to co obserwujemy
@KPopielarz @KorolukM @KONFEDERACJA_ Obserwujemy zmianę bilansu radiacyjnego 1) https://t.co/TYpEN8KxiE w związku ze zmianą stężenia CO2 co jest efektem spalania paliw kopalnych na skalę przemysłową 2) https://t.co/ZE6mh5qliw
@7_Sages_Wotcm you've proven you don't grasp physics (likely chemistry as well) so we'll just assume you are challenged by Science in general so Feldman should be a good start Feldman etal 2015 doi:10.1038/nature14240 https://t.co/oX2DzpdJOA
@ncdave4life @3GHtweets @Jakegsm @TheDisproof @Climatehope2 @EricWil06256732 @Ceist8 @DTGvmd @Jaisans @Willard1951 @wille99 @PaulDFarrar @EthonRaptor @Mark_A_Lunn @AristotleMrs @Veritatem2021 @Data79504085 @Hji45519156 @KCTaz @Valja46Zhark5 @drochir_thonnuk @paulp1232 @ShroedingerBird @J0aquIm_B4rb0s4 @Sky48115666 @0Sundance @BradPKeyes @BointonGiles @DoesThisW0rk @FD2you @S_D_Mannix @glinch72 @TWTThisIsNow @JustThi30117912 @MartinJBern @ammocrypta @ChrisBBacon3 @B_Bolshevik100 @rosmadiwahab @Robert76907841 @BolzmannMichael @Anvndarnamn5 @ProfMickWilson @FillmoreWhite @TommyLambertOKC @RobMeekel @JohnDublin10 @blufEU @NoTricksZone @RoelofBoer I'm shocked ... a truth ... Feldman could have told you doi:10.1038/nature14240 https://t.co/oqT56pVrFk
@Jaisans @DoomsdayOfMan @glinch72 @GeraldKutney @BointonGiles @craigthomler @ZombiePiano @ILuvCO2 @OscarsWild1 @doom37455413 @JamesRider3 @Jamz129 @Andrewemcameron @Article3S @AanthanurDC @IngersolRobert @RustyAway @follz1 @Ozwino @janineyve @dhaessel0 @Bitakarma @HuntinHippy @KarlRobinson02 @desenviron @fantasmavoid @ElectroPig @BingoThaGringo @KCTaz @insane_voice @CharlesDarwinTX @TAGOS22 @equi_noctis @david_hanselman @AltUS_ARC @Rikvvz @MikeH_MapleGrov @IsraelAnderson @piersmorgan @GMB @CraigKellyMP @Lauratobin1 @murpharoo @zalisteggall @drkerrynphelps @PeterWSinclair @susannareid100 @hughriminton @tanya_plibersek @lenoretaylor ah ... Feldman (2015) DOI:10.1038/nature14240 followed by Kramer (NASA) (2021) https://t.co/UVbuFj658z
@craigthomler @Jaisans @BointonGiles @ZombiePiano @ILuvCO2 @OscarsWild1 @doom37455413 @JamesRider3 @Jamz129 @Andrewemcameron @Article3S @AanthanurDC @IngersolRobert @RustyAway @glinch72 @follz1 @Ozwino @janineyve @dhaessel0 @Bitakarma @HuntinHippy @KarlRobinson02 @desenviron @fantasmavoid @ElectroPig @BingoThaGringo @KCTaz @insane_voice @CharlesDarwinTX @TAGOS22 @equi_noctis @david_hanselman @AltUS_ARC @Rikvvz @MikeH_MapleGrov @GeraldKutney @IsraelAnderson @piersmorgan @GMB @CraigKellyMP @Lauratobin1 @murpharoo @zalisteggall @drkerrynphelps @PeterWSinclair @susannareid100 @hughriminton @tanya_plibersek @lenoretaylor doi:10.1038/nature14240 seals the deal, makes the bet !
@aSinister @pauladamsalber1 @insane_voice @jpgcrowley @FriendsOScience @Barbarajdurkin @JohnOz1900 @TobyRayEnglish @Jaisans @BL20422822 @6lennybravo @RAM0667 @cbeckj @IngersolRobert @biffmack @Ceist8 @brandondaly2018 @ChrisBBacon3 @Anvndarnamn5 @Jonnyporkchop @glinch72 @TomPlesier @janggly @RustyAway @NeatCraftsmen @TheDisproof @10kClimate @ozzorro1 @robhon_ @MedBennett @LouisCy72344053 @The_Doctor_Why @GeraldKutney @ponycar06 @JohnDublin10 @PoeBrianL @Narvuntien @DaveOx13 @MarshallCd @themiwi @RushhourP @ScienceJustWins @hardtimehardta1 @SZOMB @gjcats @BradSchrag @mikeslastword @davidbroadley the closest @pauladamsalber1 gets to any science is he keeps retweeting @Kenneth72712993 a "mental health professional" who does climate science ? he quotes Feldman et al. doi:10.1038/nature14240 cherry picking from the letter without supporting his claims https://t.co/9a9jqIFeVn
> These results confirm theoretical predictions of the atmospheric greenhouse effect due to anthropogenic emissions, and provide empirical evidence of how rising CO2 levels [...] are affecting the surface energy balance. https://t.co/wV7BoboJj7
@socratesccost @IngersolRobert @Mark_A_Lunn @OscarsWild1 @Jaisans @JamesRider3 @Anthony91934436 @ClimatePatriot @SuccubasT @Andrewemcameron @craigthomler @ZombiePiano @TruthStorm17 @SpurglyD @4TimesAYear @Jamz129 @DerrickBrunton2 @Climatehope2 @FChecker76 @LordHiver @MelodyMac51 @LionStrike5 @aussie000050 @cjwcjw @glinch72 @BradVictor6 @geko214 @ElectroPig @equi_noctis @JBalsich @JoeTheAtheist @HtServadac @ricksheatcool @RustyAway @AanthanurDC @ataraxisfinch @ILuvCO2 @AMilitantAgnost @doom37455413 @sart26409389 @_42________ @Ozwino @Article3S @Bitakarma @DisorderDipolar @BlknWhtKat @janineyve @follz1 @dhaessel0 @realDonaldTrump suggest you read DOI:10.1038/nature14240 or at least the "pretty pictures" https://t.co/2fd25Ybvsb
@ClimatePoet @SeibtNaomi https://t.co/iyFYdFgSV5 https://t.co/liJOUoMTrq
@HelloHypercube @BofA_News Ah, how amazing! A image posted by you proves qualified Berkeley scientists wrong. You are a genius! https://t.co/hoQgIhJCdb Full paper - https://t.co/3Gvzf4crkf
RT @jwickers: @SpurglyDurglish @erskinedaniel @nitecrawler1867 @JimFish56837379 @ammocrypta @thinks_about_it @Ceist8 @GillesnFio @Climatear…
@SpurglyDurglish @erskinedaniel @nitecrawler1867 @JimFish56837379 @ammocrypta @thinks_about_it @Ceist8 @GillesnFio @Climatearticles @redned59 @TJ_TomJ @mattyg130 @Gladfly1 @DawnTJ90 @ecohomeblog1 @mraaronmeadows @Jamz129 @glinch72 @justanotweet @jonsaxon67 @BadgersNo @SylviaD32911201 @WilliamSHorn3 @EcoSenseNow @MATTP1949 @ShubertEugene @RedDragonFly19 @MySocialMedia6 @ozhomeschool @COCrowe @MichaelMaus6 @craigthomler @Flashgordonv @SlagKogel @DarrenN34271441 @realTeetsMcGee @Drones_of_Truth @rickyllesor1 @Warnzwifey @FriendsOScience @farmingganja @RasPuti84556755 @MartinJBern @Achilles_1985 @AlbertStienstra @DanMcHugh @NicholasRennie2 @TexCIS @SilentP68110295 @Latebird2013 Please do tell .. here's the material: https://t.co/A77bSvf6Mu
@Kenneth72712993 @ladyspat1 @RushhourP @stevenmosher @StormSignalSA @jimdtweet @KCTaz @MKahn84 @MLeiter42 @AltUS_ARC @TWTThisIsNow @MassiMassian @AtomsksSanakan @RedDragonFly19 @MonkeyMyBack @Andrewemcameron @rln_nelson @CharlesDarwinTX @CheezeWhiz_girl @quieroserabuela @redforged42 @POLICEMATRIX @caerbannog666 @DCottrell1956 @TheClimateHawk @BubbasRanch @Lunatic__Fringe @1_TMF_ @BonesZk @priscian @CrispyCX @DawnTJ90 @R0samond @DorothyDimock @Robin_Hagues @Marcusgibson @SteveP34881829 @baltch @BardLackey @hobbit179 @Peer_Review1 @stdondley @scottpw7 @MBJolnas @6lennybravo @GregoryMakles @doom37455413 @ClimateVoters @kevpluck @symk didn't bother reading Feldman etal (2015) yet and we have noticed you don't seem to have a handle on DOI's yet ... here ... this will help DOI: 10.1038/nature14240 https://t.co/CBj0M8bMyw
@Kenneth72712993 @RushhourP @stevenmosher @StormSignalSA @jimdtweet @KCTaz @MKahn84 @MLeiter42 @AltUS_ARC @TWTThisIsNow @MassiMassian @AtomsksSanakan @RedDragonFly19 @MonkeyMyBack @Andrewemcameron @rln_nelson @CharlesDarwinTX @CheezeWhiz_girl @quieroserabuela @ladyspat1 @redforged42 @POLICEMATRIX @caerbannog666 @DCottrell1956 @TheClimateHawk @BubbasRanch @Lunatic__Fringe @1_TMF_ @BonesZk @priscian @CrispyCX @DawnTJ90 @R0samond @DorothyDimock @Robin_Hagues @Marcusgibson @SteveP34881829 @baltch @BardLackey @hobbit179 @Peer_Review1 @stdondley @scottpw7 @MBJolnas @6lennybravo @GregoryMakles @doom37455413 @ClimateVoters @kevpluck @symk maybe you should have read Feldman etal (2015) and gotten background on the GEBA rather than considering CO2 "cooling" and rates of "error" ... btw - DOI's are preferred DOI: 10.5194/essd-9-601-2017 DOI: 10.1038/nature14240 DOI: 10.1038/NGEO1580 https://t.c
@CrispyCX @notGHGs @Dcoronata @TWTThisIsNow @AltUS_ARC @caerbannog666 @DawnTJ90 @stevenmosher @Andrewemcameron @spock246 @rln_nelson @MartinJBern @struikmans @AtomsksSanakan @jimdtweet @RedDragonFly19 @MassiMassian @tracemetalclean @StormSignalSA @BubbasRanch @quieroserabuela @BernardoVerda @ladyspat1 @chriscartw83 @DCottrell1956 @POLICEMATRIX @CheezeWhiz_girl @jstrgman @KCTaz @MonkeyMyBack @CharlesDarwinTX @RushhourP @redforged42 @TheClimateHawk @Lunatic__Fringe @1_TMF_ @BonesZk @priscian @R0samond @DorothyDimock @Robin_Hagues @Marcusgibson @SteveP34881829 @baltch @BardLackey @hobbit179 @Peer_Review1 @stdondley for completeness it may be of value given the timing of the observations by Harries to review Feldman etal (2015) DOI:10.1038/nature14240 https://t.co/jINN9lvjUQ
@GTMGQ @tracemetalclean Tyndall (1861) Arrhenius (1896) Arrhenius (1906) for more recent evidence Huber etal - DOI: 10.1038/NGEO1327 Feldman etal - DOI: 10.1038/nature14240 Myhre etal (199) - GRL
@GTMGQ @tracemetalclean Tyndall (1861) Arrhenius (1896) Arrhenius (1906) for more recent evidence Huber etal - DOI: 10.1038/NGEO1327 Feldman etal - DOI: 10.1038/nature14240 Myhre etal (199) - GRL
@GTMGQ @jay_greathouse @RadReduction @KrVaSt @Andrewemcameron @ammocrypta @AltUS_ARC @caerbannog666 @AtomsksSanakan @tracemetalclean @Matt_Clough start with Tyndall (1861) Arrhenius (1896) Arrhenius (1906) for more recent evidence Huber etal - DOI: 10.1038/NGEO1327 Feldman etal - DOI: 10.1038/nature14240 Myhre etal (199) - GRL
@StormSignalSA @POLICEMATRIX @CheezeWhiz_girl @DCottrell1956 @TWTThisIsNow @ladyspat1 @rln_nelson @TheClimateHawk @jimdtweet @BubbasRanch @AtomsksSanakan @Lunatic__Fringe @1_TMF_ @caerbannog666 @BonesZk @stevenmosher @RushhourP @priscian @AltUS_ARC @CrispyCX @DawnTJ90 @KCTaz @R0samond @DorothyDimock @Robin_Hagues @Marcusgibson @SteveP34881829 @Andrewemcameron @baltch @BardLackey @hobbit179 @MassiMassian @Peer_Review1 @stdondley @CharlesDarwinTX @scottpw7 @MBJolnas @6lennybravo @redforged42 @GregoryMakles @doom37455413 @ClimateVoters @kevpluck @symk @SombreGreen @Latebird2013 @BobGreene333 @aguy18310792 @Tangomitteckel funny ... your profile ... your texting ... oh I get it ... Feldman (2015) DOI:10.1038/nature14240 but your graph mixes claims about ocean heating (ESNO) with RSS data ? and I don't see a DOI ... SAD ... https://t.co/FKzB2YUIO2
@POLICEMATRIX @CheezeWhiz_girl @DCottrell1956 @TWTThisIsNow @ladyspat1 @rln_nelson @TheClimateHawk @jimdtweet @StormSignalSA @BubbasRanch @AtomsksSanakan @Lunatic__Fringe @1_TMF_ @caerbannog666 @BonesZk @stevenmosher @RushhourP @priscian @AltUS_ARC @CrispyCX @DawnTJ90 @KCTaz @R0samond @DorothyDimock @Robin_Hagues @Marcusgibson @SteveP34881829 @Andrewemcameron @baltch @BardLackey @hobbit179 @MassiMassian @Peer_Review1 @stdondley @CharlesDarwinTX @scottpw7 @MBJolnas @6lennybravo @redforged42 @GregoryMakles @doom37455413 @ClimateVoters @kevpluck @symk @SombreGreen @Latebird2013 @BobGreene333 @aguy18310792 @Tangomitteckel DOI: 10.1038/nature14240 enjoy ... its open access
@Frater_JQS @CymaticWave @DieterFrikadell @ShopSmartResist @WifeJackson1 @BardLackey @MATTP1949 @DawnTJ90 @Quantummist @CarrudoDon @wlbeeton @priscian @Jaisans @aSinister @craigthomler @GillesnFio @Barbarajdurkin @BubbasRanch @ammocrypta @emilyylime211 @Marcusgibson @DavidMichaelRi8 @geoffmprice @SlowMoneyGreen @CE_65 @georgewcowles @david_hanselman @philamina95 @elsadog_ @TheDisproof @PeterMayfitz @Swedtraders @HiFiWhiPhi @Over400ppm @rmack2x @jwickers @brendancommins @ericsteig @MzDeplorable @NIMN2019 @Erochan22761414 @4TimesAYear @struikmans @kjell_yvik @JonLeSage4 @Baysie4 @sueytonius @AGWISABIGLIE @GeorgePembroke @boggywood maybe you should start with something easy like disproving Feldman etal (2015) DOI:10.1038/nature14240 https://t.co/LoiOQcXJHl
@JamesRider3 @aSinister @Matt_Clough @Marcusgibson @Anthony_James_X @TurtleFL @OscarsWild1 @TheDalaiLamaCon @CO2notes @Schtickery @DawnTJ90 @MATTP1949 @Stephen90045069 @olivia_awaken @TheDisproof @donsmithshow2 @ChaseStoudt @Jamz129 @TQMKA @wlbeeton @91996340e81d45a @NIMN2019 @rumpledrumskin @jwickers @triton6346 @annettehunter77 @DieterFrikadell @MKahn84 @ammocrypta @BadgersNo @PaprikaLady @AltUS_ARC @baltree @bfraser747 @MartinJBern @Xshnargloth_II @Paulward44 @JonLeSage4 @ronin47 @PrimleyJack @CromwellStuff @wolfie_smythe @UreyZen @GillesnFio @Over400ppm @philamina95 @insane_voice @midacre @Youcantbeserio6 @Ozwino Fourier (1830) - cannot explain Earth's temperature Foote (1857) - hypothesis's role of CO2 Tyndall (1861) - lab proof of CO2 Arrhenius (1896) - first EBM - predicts doubling CO2 temp will rise 2-4 degrees C Feldman (2015) - surface instrument proof doi:10.1038/nature14240
@craigthomler @BardLackey @BubbasRanch @DawnTJ90 @KersevanRoberto @ammocrypta @Jaisans @emilyylime211 @Marcusgibson @DavidMichaelRi8 @CymaticWave @aSinister @Quantummist @priscian @geoffmprice @SlowMoneyGreen @ShopSmartResist @MATTP1949 @CE_65 @Frater_JQS @georgewcowles @david_hanselman @GillesnFio @philamina95 @elsadog_ @DieterFrikadell @wlbeeton @TheDisproof @PeterMayfitz @Swedtraders @HiFiWhiPhi @Over400ppm @rmack2x @jwickers @brendancommins @ericsteig @MzDeplorable @NIMN2019 @Erochan22761414 @4TimesAYear @struikmans @kjell_yvik @JonLeSage4 @Baysie4 @sueytonius @AGWISABIGLIE @GeorgePembroke @boggywood @bendynaa @oldaggie84 Feldman (2015) - surface validation of CO2 DOI:10.1038/nature14240 https://t.co/Aob4CHv60B
@AanthanurDC @FChecker76 @gjcats @Jaisans @doom37455413 @glinch72 @MikeH_MapleGrov @ZombiePiano @CharlesDarwinTX @sukkaukaukka @ILuvCO2 @Andrewemcameron @HuntinHippy @ElectroPig @Article3S @Rikvvz @david_hanselman @TAGOS22 @JamesRider3 @AltUS_ARC @insane_voice @GeraldKutney @IsraelAnderson @MartinJBern @sueytonius @RustyAway @craigthomler @KnowYourGreen1 @BadgersNo @FossilBeBare @KCTaz @Ozwino @horrdorr @RickWoollams @IngersolRobert @and_drew272 @EddyKurrents @AtomsksSanakan @MatthewHavicon @baltch @MAdjusted @HVACPerformance @mrlogic1234 @1000Frolly @Mcschweety @RoyPentland @Sou_HotWhopper @PolAnimalAus @VHuwhite @IPCC_CH Fourier (1830) - how does the Earth hold heat? Foote (1857) - CO2 candidate Tyndall (1861) - laboratory verification CO2 Arrhenius (1896) - first EBM, double the CO2, temps increase by 2-4 degrees C Feldman (2015) - surface validation of CO2 DOI:10.1038/nature14240 h
@ATomalty ok - training wheels it is start with laboratory results of Tyndall (1861) then you can graduate to Feldman etal DOI:10.1038/nature14240 as for harm - I would refer you to this https://t.co/LyKC530Epk @Matt_Clough @AltUS_ARC @ammocrypta
@david_hanselman @sofauksofa @ZombiePiano @JamesRider3 @MikeH_MapleGrov @TAGOS22 @glinch72 @Ozwino @sueytonius @CharlesDarwinTX @ILuvCO2 @doom37455413 @FChecker76 @RustyAway @Andrewemcameron @Article3S @AanthanurDC @equi_noctis @AltUS_ARC @desenviron @HuntinHippy @ElectroPig @Rikvvz @insane_voice @GeraldKutney @IsraelAnderson @MartinJBern @craigthomler @Jaisans @KnowYourGreen1 @BadgersNo @FossilBeBare @KCTaz @horrdorr @RickWoollams @IngersolRobert @and_drew272 @EddyKurrents @gjcats @AtomsksSanakan @MatthewHavicon @baltch @MAdjusted @HVACPerformance @mrlogic1234 @1000Frolly @Mcschweety @RoyPentland @Sou_HotWhopper Feldman etal DOI:10.1038/nature14240 https://t.co/iYtFwNHL55
@FChecker76 @AanthanurDC @AgtRigor @Jaisans @IngersolRobert @HuntinHippy @glinch72 @TAGOS22 @RustyAway @Andrewemcameron @Article3S @JamesRider3 @equi_noctis @david_hanselman @AltUS_ARC @desenviron @doom37455413 @ILuvCO2 @CharlesDarwinTX @ElectroPig @Rikvvz @MikeH_MapleGrov @insane_voice @GeraldKutney @IsraelAnderson @ZombiePiano @MartinJBern @sueytonius @craigthomler @KnowYourGreen1 @BadgersNo @FossilBeBare @KCTaz @Ozwino @horrdorr @RickWoollams @and_drew272 @EddyKurrents @gjcats @AtomsksSanakan @MatthewHavicon @baltch @MAdjusted @HVACPerformance @mrlogic1234 @1000Frolly @Mcschweety @RoyPentland @Sou_HotWhopper @PolAnimalAus then you should read the research Tyndall (1861) - experimental laboratory evidence Feldman etal - field measurements of the atmosphere DOIi:10.1038/nature14240 https://t.co/k4aQeWAzBt
@FChecker76 @AanthanurDC @AgtRigor @Jaisans @IngersolRobert @HuntinHippy @glinch72 @TAGOS22 @RustyAway @Andrewemcameron @Article3S @JamesRider3 @equi_noctis @david_hanselman @AltUS_ARC @desenviron @doom37455413 @ILuvCO2 @CharlesDarwinTX @ElectroPig @Rikvvz @MikeH_MapleGrov @insane_voice @GeraldKutney @IsraelAnderson @ZombiePiano @MartinJBern @sueytonius @craigthomler @KnowYourGreen1 @BadgersNo @FossilBeBare @KCTaz @Ozwino @horrdorr @RickWoollams @and_drew272 @EddyKurrents @gjcats @AtomsksSanakan @MatthewHavicon @baltch @MAdjusted @HVACPerformance @mrlogic1234 @1000Frolly @Mcschweety @RoyPentland @Sou_HotWhopper @PolAnimalAus if you could disprove Tyndall (1861) you might have a point but ... sadly ... you haven't even gotten near ... oh ... I forgot you didn't read Feldman etal here ... DOI: 10.1038/nature14240 https://t.co/tiT33DFOFx
@FChecker76 @Jaisans @IngersolRobert @HuntinHippy @AgtRigor @glinch72 @TAGOS22 @RustyAway @Andrewemcameron @Article3S @AanthanurDC @JamesRider3 @equi_noctis @david_hanselman @AltUS_ARC @desenviron @doom37455413 @ILuvCO2 @CharlesDarwinTX @ElectroPig @Rikvvz @MikeH_MapleGrov @insane_voice @GeraldKutney @IsraelAnderson @ZombiePiano @MartinJBern @sueytonius @craigthomler @KnowYourGreen1 @BadgersNo @FossilBeBare @KCTaz @Ozwino @horrdorr @RickWoollams @and_drew272 @EddyKurrents @gjcats @AtomsksSanakan @MatthewHavicon @baltch @MAdjusted @HVACPerformance @mrlogic1234 @1000Frolly @Mcschweety @RoyPentland @Sou_HotWhopper @PolAnimalAus didn't read the paper did you ? here is the DOI again ... DOI:10.1038/nature14240
@FChecker76 @Andrewemcameron @Jaisans @IngersolRobert @HuntinHippy @AgtRigor @glinch72 @TAGOS22 @RustyAway @Article3S @AanthanurDC @JamesRider3 @equi_noctis @david_hanselman @AltUS_ARC @desenviron @doom37455413 @ILuvCO2 @CharlesDarwinTX @ElectroPig @Rikvvz @MikeH_MapleGrov @insane_voice @GeraldKutney @IsraelAnderson @ZombiePiano @MartinJBern @sueytonius @craigthomler @KnowYourGreen1 @BadgersNo @FossilBeBare @KCTaz @Ozwino @horrdorr @RickWoollams @and_drew272 @EddyKurrents @gjcats @AtomsksSanakan @MatthewHavicon @baltch @MAdjusted @HVACPerformance @mrlogic1234 @1000Frolly @Mcschweety @RoyPentland @Sou_HotWhopper @PolAnimalAus we prove it experimentally ... Tyndall (1861) we've got surface data demonstrating the effect DOI:10.1038/nature14240 we'll not be surprised if you don't read it
@TurtleFL @jwickers @BadgersNo @Stephen90045069 @OscarsWild1 @Matt_Clough @aSinister @DieterFrikadell @JonLeSage4 @NIMN2019 @AltUS_ARC @insane_voice @donsmithshow2 @JamesRider3 @TheDisproof @PaprikaLady @enecosse69 @GTMGQ @FriendsOScience @DawnTJ90 @ranger_ivan @JohnPic36508489 @CaraGraesser @91996340e81d45a @Dankssteve1 @Wooflepup @Ozwino @Anthony_James_X @JayJoostJust @wlbeeton @DrPaulDWilliams @philamina95 @chris__soda @GillesnFio @ZombiePiano @Over400ppm @CromwellStuff @R0samond @GreenSat1 @just_phoenix @BriceyH1 @Mrs_Lottie_Bee @fishyfish67 @SConwaySmith @struikmans @nicolasDenver @TTyrannosaur @MesiaArte @myview1872 @csfc67 we don't have to attempt to "prove" it ... we have confirmation by both laboratory experiment and ground measurements ... you didn't read the abstract did you DOI:10.1038/nature14240
@1000Frolly @glinch72 @doom37455413 @TAGOS22 @KCTaz @Andrewemcameron @JamesRider3 @AltUS_ARC @Article3S @ZombiePiano @FChecker76 @Jaisans @david_hanselman @IsraelAnderson @KnowYourGreen1 @MikeH_MapleGrov @ElectroPig @BadgersNo @FossilBeBare @RustyAway @Ozwino @horrdorr @ILuvCO2 @RickWoollams @IngersolRobert @and_drew272 @EddyKurrents @gjcats @AtomsksSanakan @MatthewHavicon @baltch @MAdjusted @HVACPerformance @mrlogic1234 @Mcschweety @sueytonius @craigthomler @CharlesDarwinTX @RoyPentland @Sou_HotWhopper @PolAnimalAus @VHuwhite @1_TMF_ @seaplaneguy @BunnyKiller9 @Confraria8 @Dave28492212 @ChunxOfEarth @Luarien @ProfBrianCox you don't know science do you ... then read this ... it doesn't use a tin box DOI:10.1038/nature14240
@glinch72 @1000Frolly @doom37455413 @TAGOS22 @KCTaz @Andrewemcameron @JamesRider3 @AltUS_ARC @Article3S @ZombiePiano @FChecker76 @Jaisans @david_hanselman @IsraelAnderson @KnowYourGreen1 @MikeH_MapleGrov @ElectroPig @BadgersNo @FossilBeBare @RustyAway @Ozwino @horrdorr @ILuvCO2 @RickWoollams @IngersolRobert @and_drew272 @EddyKurrents @gjcats @AtomsksSanakan @MatthewHavicon @baltch @MAdjusted @HVACPerformance @mrlogic1234 @Mcschweety @sueytonius @craigthomler @CharlesDarwinTX @RoyPentland @Sou_HotWhopper @PolAnimalAus @VHuwhite @1_TMF_ @seaplaneguy @BunnyKiller9 @Confraria8 @Dave28492212 @ChunxOfEarth @Luarien @ProfBrianCox to be exact DOI:10.1038/nature14240 "Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010" Feldman etal (2015)
@Wooflepup @Ozwino @ZombiePiano @GTMGQ @Anthony_James_X @AltUS_ARC @BadgersNo @DawnTJ90 @TheDisproof @donsmithshow2 @Stephen90045069 @jwickers @OscarsWild1 @aSinister @ranger_ivan @Matt_Clough @JayJoostJust @DieterFrikadell @JamesRider3 @wlbeeton @DrPaulDWilliams @NIMN2019 @philamina95 @chris__soda @91996340e81d45a @GillesnFio @Over400ppm @enecosse69 @CromwellStuff @R0samond @GreenSat1 @just_phoenix @BriceyH1 @Mrs_Lottie_Bee @JonLeSage4 @fishyfish67 @SConwaySmith @struikmans @nicolasDenver @TTyrannosaur @MesiaArte @myview1872 @csfc67 @PolAnimalAus @FriendsOScience @DeightonSue @mtnman0038 @ElQuesoSabio @RegimeChangeBC @MannockDavid you failed ... water vapor is a condensing GHG please re-read sections on optical thickness and the Schwarzschild equations ... recommend reading DOI:10.1038/nature14240
@njbtweet @DawnTJ90 @GTMGQ @ammocrypta @SylviaD32911201 @Matt_Clough @borisyeltzin @psancintel @preueth @PacificVp @AltUS_ARC @WalterHorsting @KersevanRoberto @DieterFrikadell @struikmans @ZombiePiano @johndodwyer @TheDisproof @GillesnFio @NIMN2019 @AltGreen2 @Farmer3086 @WicaksonoRian @bomac_macbo @verhegja @frieda_anna @Over400ppm @ElQuesoSabio @DBater2 @wlbeeton @DeightonSue @Barbarajdurkin @vixelpixen @JonLeSage4 @Yorks_Lancs @Robin_Hagues @CromwellStuff @Johnnydharma1 @aSinister @nicolasDenver @BenardeteJ @tigg47 @MikeH_MapleGrov @MannockDavid @FrankLasCPA @FriendsOScience @usanorthcoast @JamesMc86141084 @jonsaxon67 @nsromaine now to be fair to Dawn / Frazer (who ever they are today) we didn't get really confirming data on CO2 as a forcing factor til the work of Feldman etal 2015 doi:10.1038/nature14240 https://t.co/biG3eH5G1w
@rolferd @GeraldKutney @StuntPope @prageru Lindzen (MIT) has the same reputation as Easterbrook (WWU Geology emeritus) with similar response from their institutions - as for his claim that there is no evidence that CO2 has an influence - he'll need to read doi:10.1038/nature14240 https://t.co/3uzhHIRhOn
@1_TMF_ @Andrewemcameron @Article3S @Jaisans @MikeH_MapleGrov @doom37455413 @ZombiePiano @JamesRider3 @david_hanselman @craigthomler @KCTaz @IngersolRobert @ILuvCO2 @horrdorr @RustyAway @AltUS_ARC @RickWoollams @and_drew272 @EddyKurrents @FChecker76 @gjcats @Ozwino @BadgersNo @AtomsksSanakan @MatthewHavicon @baltch @MAdjusted @HVACPerformance @mrlogic1234 @1000Frolly @Mcschweety @sueytonius @TAGOS22 @CharlesDarwinTX @George_Peppard @PAlterBoy1 @RoyPentland @Sou_HotWhopper @ElectroPig @PolAnimalAus @VHuwhite @seaplaneguy @BunnyKiller9 @Confraria8 @Dave28492212 @ChunxOfEarth @Luarien @ProfBrianCox @readfearn your quote is wrong in substance and fact, you have no data to support your contention - on the other hand we can prove it theoretically and have experimental data to back it up doi:10.1038/nature14240 - feel free to challenge LLNL ... point, set, match - you lose https://t.co/TwPdWHui
@spock246 @DieterFrikadell @Soronya @MAdjusted @ShopSmartResist @aSinister @craigthomler @ralphbalexander @PMgeezer @wlbeeton @ScienceNotDogma @NIMN2019 @rmack2x @DavidMichaelRi8 @NoelTurner194 @Tokyo_Tom @RealDavidJensen @JonLeSage4 @AltUS_ARC @Cris_Paunescu @VickieLouise7 @Trismos @tor_lan @FriendsOScience @Quantummist @Over400ppm @MATTP1949 @Graeme__McGuire @cpernell8521 @FrackerDave @FrendsJunkSci @GillesnFio @uvachemistry @GeraldKutney @CymaticWave @usanorthcoast @JohnPisulaMBA @AtomsksSanakan @jeff_luciana @Captain_JimKirk @PhillipHoey @Carbongate @sanjay_world @4TimesAYear @Barbarajdurkin @EthonRaptor @jamesb_bkk @BobRey77 @wearestillfree @JamesDelingpole DOI 10.1038/nature14240 "Empirical evidence for the effect of rising atmospheric carbon dioxide levels on Earth's surface energy balance is presented: the increase [...] To paraphrase you: You should read it.
@Jon53287766 @EthonRaptor @NikolovScience @GillesnFio @jimdtweet @DawnTJ90 @3GHtweets @NoctuaMinervae @theresphysics @mrpjtay @MonkeyMyBack @Kenneth72712993 @struikmans @ClimateDan_ @CoinMomma @Gazzagunna @RoyPentland @dunvirkin @EcoSenseNow @MedBennett @CharlesDarwinTX @FrankWi74044551 @PolAnimalAus @Tangomitteckel @Fixiefreaky @Bananenrijperij @Maegan54339858 @ElQuesoSabio @ClimatePoet @BudBromley @msroberts0619 @MercuryTimes @peden_c @ClimateRealists @badmoonrising11 @Gladfly1 @Tokyo_Tom @granitereason @YackyDoodleDnDy @BradSchrag @IbachPeter @UvMeter @RustyAway @swcrisis @PhilosophySeel @hrseiber @36_xenon @KCTaz @conely6511 @JohnBurnieTas can you evaluate the methods in this paper? https://t.co/cF9EeA5q8T
@flyonthewall182 @sueytonius @KCTaz @gjcats @RhodanDragon @GeraldKutney @airstripone84 @ClimateDan_ @StealthFlyBy @MLBinWA @StormSignalSA @david_hanselman @LLViola @craigthomler @jk76022 @rftimson @SylviaD32911201 @TruthfulBook @SteveSGoddard @RalphRotten0 @WaltKostrzewski @AtomsksSanakan @ClarkGRichards @bigskyrad @AltUS_ARC @Tangomitteckel @jamieswilson @Boi_dBoi_d @Michael91423987 @midacre @CymaticWave @Fixiefreaky @RenatusVoltaire @DougBookwriter2 @Paganliam @PolAnimalAus @GAWHeckman @trippfunderburk @MatthewHavicon @DanielMcDonald4 @ILuvCO2 @Tokyo_Tom @markbjardine @EddyKurrents @MHayden951 @alcpjr @bmurphypots @FilesOfDresden @GPRacer51 @TheEndisFar Do us a favor, if you quote an article you can start by linking to it: https://t.co/9zfpfP8FB4 Then don't screenshot your whole desktop, only the bits that are actually important. https://t.co/82Xu7ps1Nv
A
JO
D
IC
AW
LL
M
M
RV
AS
BH
B
JC
CC
JN
MT
RL
OM
R
SS
S
AT
VC
R
IB
HS
D
AB
M
DM
DK
JR
TN
SB
CS
UE
BF
DT
VZ
DN
MN
J
DO
P
B
U
DH
M
PI
KJ
JT
B
TA
J
A
MC
AI
BL
JW
SR
M