Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
Discussions highlight the ongoing debate and skepticism around human pheromones, with examples like objections to claims about chemicals and mentions of study limitations, which reflect a cautious and critical tone; phrase choices such as 'flawed,' 'no conclusive evidence,' and 'almost all false positives' underscore the scientific uncertainty and collective cautious outlook.
Most discussions indicate skepticism or a neutral stance, acknowledging the lack of conclusive evidence for human pheromones. The posts emphasize methodological flaws and the absence of proven findings.
Participants show moderate interest, mainly engaging through dismissive remarks or minor clarifications, rather than deep exploration of the subject.
The exchanges involve some elaboration, with users citing studies or criticizing research flaws, suggesting a moderate level of thoughtful discussion.
The overall tone reflects an understanding that the scientific community remains inconclusive, so the perceived impact of ongoing research is seen as limited and cautious.
@citrusgirlpaige https://t.co/1TF27cJQBX
@The_Fancy_Squid @HawkInATX @meat_witch @BadMedicalTakes https://t.co/U07u4C2xzw https://t.co/t8BdvjF7ww
@8008smcgee @HomicideHotline @greentexts_bot You're the one with burden of proof to show a study that does actually prove we can sense or produce pheromones Just for you tho here's a study saying it's almost all false positives and the compounds people say are pheromones aren't that https://t.co/CvZvGkXV5E
@Luismi_cervus Buscando ahora encontré un artículo de 2015 (solo dispongo del resumen) que menciona que todavía no se ha demostrado ni la existencia de hormonas ni su fisiología: https://t.co/gogGDYto7v
@Pdorrestein1 Wyatt 2015, The search for human pheromones: the lost decades and the necessity of returning to first principles https://t.co/SZuNCmLo4F
@AbuAfiaAK @RebrandedSoup @malikbazille If I’m not mistaken no experts inferred from that study that the mechanism was pheromones and the current scientific position is neutral on whether pheromones exist. This study is a good read akhi: https://t.co/lFgmMoUbyu
Testosterone administration in healthy men leads to hypertrophy of muscle fibers, increasing muscle size and volume. This process is dose-dependent, primarily due to existing muscle fiber hypertrophy rather than new…
The vomeronasal organ is part of the olfactory system involved in social and sexual behaviors in animals. Its presence and function in humans remain debated, with ongoing research exploring its existence and potential…
@__mossymoss @TheMarxxxist No they don't https://t.co/MyDtcUl306 Perhaps learn the difference between Must Musk They are not the same
@citrusgirlpaige https://t.co/1TF27cJQBX
@BarbettiJames @DrAllyLouks That study is flawed because the chemicals havd not been clearly identified as pheremones, and the amount used was a higher quantity than what is found in humans. There's no conclusive evidence of any human pheremone even if we think it's possible. https://t.co/dhAfSdNTu5 https://t.co/07lw9ZYIPF
@NotRossCramer @vmonberets @DrAllyLouks No, she is not. We have not identified a chemical that works like a pheremone and we also have not identified any organ that works like pheremone detectors. It's still being researched but nothing conclusive has been found to date. https://t.co/dhAfSdNTu5
@AbuAfiaAK @RebrandedSoup @malikbazille If I’m not mistaken no experts inferred from that study that the mechanism was pheromones and the current scientific position is neutral on whether pheromones exist. This study is a good read akhi: https://t.co/lFgmMoUbyu
@8008smcgee @greentexts_bot Humans are very unlikely to smell pheromones from other humans and even if we can it isn't anything proven with a smell compound or how we sense it https://t.co/CvZvGkXV5E
@8008smcgee @HomicideHotline @greentexts_bot You're the one with burden of proof to show a study that does actually prove we can sense or produce pheromones Just for you tho here's a study saying it's almost all false positives and the compounds people say are pheromones aren't that https://t.co/CvZvGkXV5E
@Architekt89 @WingsEcosse @Slatzism https://t.co/yY7Ll9oSuq
@BadMedicalTakes https://t.co/U07u4C2xzw
Everyone needs to read this. Every time the pheromone thing comes up I have to read the same nonsense tweets
@The_Fancy_Squid @HawkInATX @meat_witch @BadMedicalTakes https://t.co/U07u4C2xzw https://t.co/t8BdvjF7ww
RT @PkCael: @Luismi_cervus Buscando ahora encontré un artículo de 2015 (solo dispongo del resumen) que menciona que todavía no se ha demost…
@Luismi_cervus Buscando ahora encontré un artículo de 2015 (solo dispongo del resumen) que menciona que todavía no se ha demostrado ni la existencia de hormonas ni su fisiología: https://t.co/gogGDYto7v
@Pdorrestein1 Wyatt 2015, The search for human pheromones: the lost decades and the necessity of returning to first principles https://t.co/SZuNCmLo4F
wyniki rozrodu, co wyraziło się wzrostem liczby uro‑ Doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.2994. dzonych prosiąt w miocie ogółem o 0,88 oraz urodzo‑ 12. Wyatt T.D. ...
doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.2994. Stoyanov GS, Matev BK, Valchanov P, Sapundzhiev N, Young JR. The human vomeronasal (Jacobson's) organ: A short ...
... 10.1098/rspb.1995.0087. Pheromones: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2014.2994 (while you're right that evidence for human ...
人間がフェロモンに反応するという科学的証拠はありません。 https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rspb.2014.2994. 編集：ダウン ...
There is no scientific evidence that humans react to pheromones. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rspb.2014.2994. Edit ...
Nincs tudományos bizonyíték arra, hogy az emberek reagálnak a feromonokra. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rspb.2014.2994.
İnsanların feromonlara tepki verdiğine dair bilimsel bir kanıt yok. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rspb.2014.2994.
Takde bukti saintifik yang manusia ada tindak balas pada feromon. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rspb.2014.2994. Edit ...
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rspb.2014.2994?download=true. Dua kajian yang sering disebut sebagai bukti terkuat yang ...
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rspb.2014.2994?download=true. Два исследования, которые часто цитируются как наиболее ...
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rspb.2014.2994?download=true. Two studies which have often been cited as the strongest ...
... -pheromones · https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.2994 · https://anatomypubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ar.a.20125 · More replies.
... 10.1098/rspb.2014.2994. | Arşiv Bağlantısı. 8. Şikayet Et; Mantık Hatası. 0. Paylaş; Alıntıla; Alıntıları Göster.
... 10.1098/rspb.2014.2994). [^3^]: [PLOS ONE](https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062499). [^4^]: [Neuropsychopharmacology](https://dx.doi ...
1804, 2015, p. 20142994., https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.2994. ARCHIVADO EN: Cerebro · Ciencia ...
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2014.2994. Our experts continually monitor the health and wellness space, and we update ...
Do your research mate https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2014.2994 There is a ton of evidence to suggest. Big one being ...
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rspb.2014.2994; Zsok F. (2017). What kind of love is love at first sight? An empirical ...
... .sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301211504004749 · https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rspb.2014.2994 · mrsamsa. • 7y ...
Упоминаний набралось сотни (Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 2015, 282, 1804, 20142994, doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.2994). Вывод он сделал тот ...
... 10.1098/rspb.2014.2994. Explore more on these topics. Science · Head quarters · Psychology · blogposts. Share. Reuse this content. Head quarters ...
DM
A
A
C
SP
LA
B
M
L
C林