Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
Most discussions reflect curiosity and recognition of the article’s importance, exemplified by comments like 'This is an interesting article' and references to new evidence reshaping understanding of human ancestry. The tone varies from straightforward acknowledgment to deeper scientific debates about the validity of genetics versus fossil records, indicating a moderate level of engagement and impact.
The majority of discussions acknowledge the significance of the article, especially its challenge to traditional views on human ancestry, indicating a moderate to strong agreement.
Participants seem highly interested in the topic, with multiple comments referencing specific scientific findings and related research.
Posts range from brief affirmations to more detailed discussions, showing some engagement with the scientific concepts and implications.
The discussions suggest the publication influences thoughts on human evolution, although overall perceived impact remains moderate due to scientific technicality.
This paper makes the claim that genetics has "resolved" Hominid phylogenetics. When genetics contradicts the fossil record or morphological affinities, it is genetics that is in error, not the fossil record. https://t.co/efBxIjFOo4
@eman_gnostic @DelanoWilson3 Ardi shows 25% increase over chimps at 350 cubic cm from 4-5 mya: https://t.co/jxr6W7P0DI Australopithecus 3 mya = 450 ccm, rudolfensis 2 mya = 750 ccm, homo erectus 1k-1200 ccm, humans 1400 ccm. https://t.co/fB1NTHHaAi
@johangillman https://t.co/utHyKBHmgz
@EricTropicalTX Here is a link which clarifies some why there is no missing link between great apes and humans. https://t.co/efBxIjFOo4
@radicalanthro @MoralLandscapes People who think they understand what a Hominid, Hominin, or great ape is should study primates and mammals in general to better abandon Biblical and other biases about what a human is. Hominins / great apes is not a real division see here https://t.co/efBxIjFOo4
@subhi_life @53N3X @elonmusk https://t.co/9NkRofQ3Oa
Did we evolve from a knuckle-walking ape? This video explores the debate surrounding human ancestry with insights from Professor DeSilva. Using recent research, we delve into the implications of new findings on the…
Ardipithecus was a hominin species that lived between 44 and 57 million years ago. This video examines research on its brain size, shape, and function, revealing early features that differ from modern humans and…
@Net_Tertia They did, just in a different direction. https://t.co/BCEyKPWevy
This paper makes the claim that genetics has "resolved" Hominid phylogenetics. When genetics contradicts the fossil record or morphological affinities, it is genetics that is in error, not the fossil record. https://t.co/efBxIjFOo4
@radicalanthro @MoralLandscapes People who think they understand what a Hominid, Hominin, or great ape is should study primates and mammals in general to better abandon Biblical and other biases about what a human is. Hominins / great apes is not a real division see here https://t.co/efBxIjFOo4
@EricTropicalTX Here is a link which clarifies some why there is no missing link between great apes and humans. https://t.co/efBxIjFOo4
Neither chimpanzee nor human, Ardipithecus reveals the surprising ancestry of both | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences https://t.co/kWcqxz4VtA Ardip. was an early hominid, close relative of the Gorilla-Homo-Pan last common ancestor, google: human evolution Verhaegen
@subhi_life @53N3X @elonmusk https://t.co/9NkRofQ3Oa
@Trinity20224 @BobNotfondajane This is an interesting article too. https://t.co/dzfS80Dnpj
@johangillman https://t.co/utHyKBHmgz
@eman_gnostic @DelanoWilson3 Ardi shows 25% increase over chimps at 350 cubic cm from 4-5 mya: https://t.co/jxr6W7P0DI Australopithecus 3 mya = 450 ccm, rudolfensis 2 mya = 750 ccm, homo erectus 1k-1200 ccm, humans 1400 ccm. https://t.co/fB1NTHHaAi
AV
VA
FF
MS
TP
MV
S