Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The discussions frequently reference the findings of the study, particularly the statistic that cloth masks allow almost 97% of particles to pass through, compared to medical masks which allow 44%. Phrases like '97% ineffective' and the repeated analogies to sheep suggest a shared sentiment of frustration and betrayal from perceived public health misinformation. The tone is often sarcastic and accusatory, suggesting a strong emotional response to the implications of the study on public policy and trust in health authorities.
The overwhelming majority of discussions express strong agreement with the findings of the publication, reinforcing the idea that cloth masks are ineffective.
Many participants demonstrate high interest by sharing insights and referencing the study repeatedly.
While many individuals share the same message, the depth of discussion remains somewhat surface-level, mostly reiterating points from the published article without extensive analysis.
Participants perceive a significant impact from the findings, suggesting past mandates were based on misinformation, thus affecting public trust.
7/7 …by not wearing a cloth mask such as you might wear. They do nothing, in the only scientific randomized controlled trial they INCREASED infection, and besides ... ... I AM grandpa. w. (Paper is paywalled, here's the SciHub link.) https://t.co/w8G5tRHgBJ
@kevinnbass And it’s from 2015, so this was known well before the Covid cloth mask mandates. https://t.co/21lCOQDb4R
https://t.co/x9WuUjWFMc か。しかしこのcontrolはno maskではないusual practice, which included mask wearingなので，マスクとしては良くないということしかわからない https://t.co/iFZMrufU3e
Study 8: “A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers” https://t.co/65VPHhJ8nc
22/4/15 - A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers https://t.co/assEydeOd6 https://t.co/IqVdYfBZfl
@musikutiv Apropos: https://t.co/xlcQBWmFVt https://t.co/DoeVhdyjo3
This video explores the latest advancements in quantum computing, focusing on key breakthroughs and their potential applications. Learn about how these technologies could revolutionize industries ranging from…
This video discusses a recent cluster randomised trial comparing cloth masks to medical masks among healthcare workers. It highlights significant findings regarding the increased risks associated with cloth masks…
This video describes how to use masks correctly during the COVID-19 pandemic, including recommendations from WHO and CDC. It highlights the risks associated with cloth masks compared to medical masks, emphasizing the…
This video addresses the critical comparison of cloth masks and medical masks among healthcare workers, highlighting how cloth masks may increase the risk of respiratory infections. Join us in examining the implications…
@ACTBrigitte 2015 mask study test by NIH/NCBI for US Library of Congress on a .Gov website- "Results: ....Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%." https://t.co/d42dYaw67R
@MilaLovesJoe NIH NCBI on a .Gov website CONCLUDED IN 2015: "Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%." https://t.co/d42dYaw67R
@Nonstopdramus @square_her36337 @CharlotteEmmaUK 100%, and I remember sharing these on potato book before they perma banned me. I just shared a link to the NIH study: https://t.co/Z73N2j2wQw And they locked my account down for a month.
@square_her36337 @CharlotteEmmaUK I'll take no friends over being cattle. https://t.co/Z73N2j2wQw
@ShadowofEzra Hey thing, you realize that in 2015, the NIH CONCLUDED that "Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%." This is verified, in the Library of Congress, from a .Gov website. Say,"Baaaaaa, Baaaaaaaa." It's more believable https://t.co/d42dYaw67R
@WakeUpPatriott The '97% ineffective at stopping particles' face diapers as reported by NIH/NCBI on .Gov Website in 2014/2015... "Baaaaaaa. Baaaaaaaa," say the sheep! https://t.co/d42dYavyij
@kevinnbass https://t.co/OB3Y6nY4aQ
RT @srbentley: @kevinnbass And it’s from 2015, so this was known well before the Covid cloth mask mandates. https://t.co/21lCOQDb4R
@kevinnbass Link to article: https://t.co/wRePL6QX7S
RT @srbentley: @kevinnbass And it’s from 2015, so this was known well before the Covid cloth mask mandates. https://t.co/21lCOQDb4R
RT @BenFranklin1171: They knew cloths masks were useless if not harmful yet told people they had to wear them. Public health took the trus…
They knew cloths masks were useless if not harmful yet told people they had to wear them. Public health took the trust of the public, tossed it in the garbage, took a shit on it and lit it on fire. https://t.co/hFMzjf5JmL
RT @srbentley: @kevinnbass And it’s from 2015, so this was known well before the Covid cloth mask mandates. https://t.co/21lCOQDb4R
@kevinnbass And it’s from 2015, so this was known well before the Covid cloth mask mandates. https://t.co/21lCOQDb4R
@AmericaPapaBear @GavinNewsom "BAAAAA," say the sheep NCBI/NIH Report .gov website 2014/15 RESULTS: "Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%." If you're ordered to wear something for safety that's 97% INEFFECTIVE it's ONLY about CONTROL! "Baa Baa" https://t.co/d42dYavyij
@BreitbartNews NIH/NCBI .gov Website 2014/15' Results: ......"Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%." https://t.co/d42dYaw67R "Baaaaa, Baaaaaa," say the sheep-
@maggiewise111 2014/15' RESULTS/CONCLUSION .GOV Website! NIH/NCBI: "Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%." https://t.co/d42dYavyij
@MrAndyNgo @gregbanks @TNTT_Hazelo Who's the defense lawyer? NIH/NCBI report on .Gov website says The masks are '97% ineffective at stopping particles' & 'are NOT recommended in high risk situations.' https://t.co/d42dYavyij
@MilaLovesJoe Cloth masks are 97% ineffective at stopping particles/Med masks 44% ineffective. Neither are recommended in high risk situations- 2014/15' NIH/NCBI .Gov website- Hold hands and say, "Baaaaa Baaaa' like good lil sheeple https://t.co/d42dYaw67R
@DawnsMission NIH said cloth masks are 97% ineffective at stopping particles and they're not recommended for use in high risk situations. From OMG 2014/2015 studies published by NIH-NCBI and on a .Gov website too- Why the mandating uses in 10;-20'21'...? https://t.co/d42dYavyij
@DawnsMission Anyone wearing a mask now/then is compromised- 97% ineffective stopping particles/cloth masks and 'not recommended 'for HCWs, particularly in high-risk situations' NIH/NCBI Conclusions 10 YEARS AGO! .Gov website- https://t.co/d42dYavyij
@Shawn_Farash 04/2015: NIH/NCBI .Gov Website- Results: 'Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%.' Conclusion: 'as a precautionary measure, cloth masks should not be recommended for HCWs, particularly in high-risk situations' https://t.co/d42dYaw67R
@MilaLovesJoe 2014/2015 NIH .gov Website: 'Results- Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%.' Conclusions: 'cloth masks should not be recommended for HCWs, particularly in high-risk situations,.." The sheep say, "Baaaaa!" https://t.co/d42dYavyij
RT @TGregoryHunt: @DerrickEvans4WV 2014/2015 Conclusion- NIH/NCBI .gov website: "Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and…
@DerrickEvans4WV 2014/2015 Conclusion- NIH/NCBI .gov website: "Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%." & "as a precautionary measure, cloth masks should not be recommended for HCWs, particularly in high-risk situations" "Baaa Baaa." https://t.co/d42dYavyij
@MilaLovesJoe April 2015 .Gov website of NIH/NCBI Results: "Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%." Conclusions: "..as a precautionary measure, cloth masks should not be recommended for HCWs, particularly in high-risk situations" https://t.co/d42dYavyij
@LazarusLong13 They catch a lot of viruses you mean? https://t.co/moFFN5uart
@1stFormula @gov_fails @MCCCANM There are plenty of results, mostly for two primary studies, if you search "before:2020-1-1 cloth mask respiratory virus" on Google. Covid incentivized BS studies to retroactively justify authoritarian policies. https://t.co/N3GBsrP1ou https://t.co/UVMOBrQPBK
@BasedMikeLee I'll avoid maskers, cuz they're Sheeple. 04/2015: "..as a precautionary measure, cloth masks should not be recommended for HCWs, particularly in high-risk situations.." "Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%." https://t.co/d42dYavyij
@Shawn_Farash NCBI/NIH .Gov Website Date April 2015 "Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%." "as a precautionary measure, cloth masks should not be recommended for HCWs, particularly in high-risk situations" "Baaaa,' say the sheep https://t.co/d42dYavyij
@atensnut Well in 2014 NIH where his wife worked concluded cloth masks are "97% ineffective at stopping particle. ...med masks 44% ineffective..." USAID funded, .GOV website https://t.co/d42dYavyij
@stella_immanuel It was concluded in 2014/2015 by NIH on a .GOV website that cloth masks are 97% ineffective at stopping particles/med 44% ineffective- USELESS only about ppl control- https://t.co/d42dYavyij
@Chatty_si @pauwwoo @DrNeilStone 1) my original comment is about cloth masks. 2) surgical masks stop some droplets, happy to stipulate. 3) visualization is not a trial. https://t.co/cSXcNJl7fR
@atensnut CONCLUSION: 97% ineffective(cloth masks), 44% ineffective(med mask) at stopping ANY particle. 2015, .GOV-NIH website- https://t.co/d42dYavyij
@redsteeze "Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%." "..as a precautionary measure, cloth masks should not be recommended for HCWs, particularly in high-risk situations..." https://t.co/d42dYavyij
@iAnonPatriot "Cloth masks are 97% ineffective at stopping particles..." .GOV website, NIH Dated: April 15' https://t.co/d42dYaw67R
@Miguel012025 @DrGroquik disant le contraire. Conseil: lisez ce que vous publiez. https://t.co/jDdTuoLWZW
@iAnonPatriot .Gov Website/US Library of Congress- National Institutue of Health/NCBI report. 2015: Cloth masks are 97% ineffective at stopping particles, medical rated at 44% ineffective... ''BaaaaaBaaaaaa" say the sheep- https://t.co/d42dYaw67R
@TaraBull808 NIH/NCBI- US Library of Congress report, 2015 CONCLUSION/.GOV Website: "Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%." https://t.co/d42dYaw67R
@CnnCesspool @broadwaybabyto Cloth masks are proven to increase the risk of infection to the wearer, while not decreasing the risk of infection to those around them. https://t.co/FpfZrfSupd
@LeadingReport US Library of Congress Report FROM 2015- NIH-NCBI-.GOV WEBSITE: "Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%." https://t.co/d42dYaw67R
@atensnut US Library of Congress Report FROM 2015- NIH-NCBI-.GOV WEBSITE: "Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%." https://t.co/d42dYaw67R
@TaraBull808 It's only about 'Control' Concluded in 2015 that cloth masks are 97% ineffective at stopping particles w/med masks 44% ineffective FROM: US LIBRARY OF CONGRESS/NIH/NCBI/.GOV Website: https://t.co/d42dYaw67R
@RealHickory US Library of Congress Report FROM 2015- NIH-NCBI-.GOV WEBSITE: "Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%." https://t.co/d42dYaw67R
@MAGAResource So Jet trails + Covid Vax + (X)Boosters + Y= 'Bird Flu' Y'all know this equation is more accurate than any WHO/CDC report- Still wearing your US Library of Congress/NIH/NCBI verified cloth masks as 97% useless at stopping particles(med 44% ineffective)? https://t.co/d42dYaw67R
RT @Jikkyleaks: Cloth masks and surgical masks don't work in routine use by healthcare workers. MacIntyre BMJ 2015 https://t.co/rUF9APg8g5
@BuckSexton In 2015, NIH/NCBI US Library of Congress report states cloth masks are 97% ineffective at stopping particles and medical masks at 44% ineffective- "Baaaa," say the sheeple https://t.co/d42dYaw67R
@kevinnbass NEARLY USELESS! Y'all are SHEEP! Baaa, Baaaaaa 2015: NIH/NCBI "Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%." https://t.co/d42dYaw67R
@AgainstKookery @TakethatCt @rw_christian @mcfunny @graciefacelove @DrPepperMD @Tyler_A_Harper Or did you mean cloth masks? From RCT (the gold standard:) in 2015 (meaning we knew prior to 2020) https://t.co/iIdbCyk2z6
@kimberlyratliff @hormonedietdoc Here's just one study, from 2015, BEFORE the effectiveness of masks was completely exaggerated and politicized. I wonder if you recall Fauci advising a friend by email not to wear a mask? https://t.co/Ljvi8zDwmV https://t.co/vKraOSVKY2
@Mischa_e_k @thehealthb0t https://t.co/Z73N2j2wQw
@JebraFaushay Masks do not work: https://t.co/4fRTaHJlCe
RT @Redbanzai129199: @scott_squires Cloth masks do not work to control rhe spread of infection and only increase the rate of infection in t…
@scott_squires Cloth masks do not work to control rhe spread of infection and only increase the rate of infection in the wearer. That is likely true of surgical masks too as they are just as porous. Respirator masks likely control infection. See here: https://t.co/4fRTaHJTrM
RT @originator39: A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers https://t.co/QxuknlSpIW
@BHudsonWrites @JoshWalkos @BillDoesStuff2 @Spartan1Tim @LatheGrain 16) https://t.co/nPGHKVae7p
RT @Quo_vadis_BRD: @musikutiv Apropos: https://t.co/xlcQBWmFVt https://t.co/DoeVhdyjo3
RT @Quo_vadis_BRD: @musikutiv Apropos: https://t.co/xlcQBWmFVt https://t.co/DoeVhdyjo3
@musikutiv Apropos: https://t.co/xlcQBWmFVt https://t.co/DoeVhdyjo3
@AcrobaticFix @xxBB69xx @GuntherEagleman @MarioNawfal MacIntyre CR, et al. (2015). "A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers." This study found that the penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and that the penetration of medical masks was 44%.
@LibertyNow11 @xxBB69xx @GuntherEagleman @MarioNawfal Correct. MacIntyre CR, et al. (2015). "A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers." found the penetration of cloth masks was almost 97% and penetration of medical masks was 44%.
@nypost Someone's names were discovered on the Epstein logs... BTW .GOV website concluded cloth masks are 97% ineffective/medical masks 44% ineffective- NIH/NCBI/2015 "Baaaaa, Baaaaaa" say the sheep- https://t.co/d42dYaw67R
@QueenLa_Queefa @WhiskeyMD247365 @nypost Please don't counter an NIH/NCBI Study from 15' on a .GOV website with a CNN report :) "Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%." https://t.co/d42dYaw67R
@WhiskeyMD247365 @nypost 97% ineffective(cloth), 44% ineffective medical: https://t.co/d42dYaw67R
@nypost The 'shots' cause Histrionic Personality Disorder. Same ingredient as in the 08'-10' that are credited for making DIY/Invented Genders. BTW: 2015 study concluded that cloth masks are 97% ineffective/Med masks 44% ineffective. "Baaaa,' say the sheep https://t.co/d42dYaw67R
@howdster @IchibanDeath @KnowingBetterYT https://t.co/wdWWAQxyEA from 2015.
@PIX11News WPIX is right there to modal verb Election Infection 2.0 to the credulous public Still wear the 'MASK' that US Library of Congress/NIH/.GOV Website Concluded in 2015 "Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%"? Baaa Baaa https://t.co/d42dYaw67R
@nvdems After you realized that all your followers suffer from credulous personality disorder(masks are 97% ineffective at stopping particles/2015/us library of congress report/.GOV website lmfao https://t.co/d42dYaw67R Guess what? The GOP 'fake voters' lmfao know all your addresses https://t.co/PjjdlAYfT6
@ChuckCallesto Mostly about control and public credulity levels Perfect example: NIH Report in 2015 US Library of Congress accessible off a '.GOV" website clearly states that cloth masks are 97% ineffective at stopping particles, and medical masks 44% ineffective https://t.co/d42dYaw67R
@FOX5Vegas When BILLIONS of ppl fell for wearing a "97% ineffective at stopping particles.." According to a 2015 US Library of Congress Report from a .Gov website, it was proven that 'CREDULITY' has infected the masses(minus 'M'), ppl will believe anything https://t.co/d42dYaw67R
@NEWSMAX So forcing Billions to wear a "97% INEFFECTIVE at stopping particles' mask, everything now is just straight Bull$*it, The Credulous States Of America. BTW: Are the 15 million Bidinvaders included on the unemployment reports yet, or strictly just the census https://t.co/d42dYaw67R
@AP So being BILLIONS of Sheeple wore a useless(97% ineffective at stopping particles/NIH/US Library of Congress 2015). And because of their credulity, every news report is is faker than Mike Robinisons Vajayjay- https://t.co/d42dYaw67R
@TheJusticeDept Open borders and a dozen ILLEGAL ALIENS ARRESTED FOR: SEX CRIMES, BOMB MAKING are moot from this discussion authorized by PedoJoe, Ho and Co. All those mask wearers(97% ineffective at stopping particles/2015/.Gov website) believe all your BS though https://t.co/d42dYaw67R
@kevinnbass NIH .Gov Website, 2015, "Cloth masks are 97% ineffective at stopping particles, medical masks 44% ineffective.." https://t.co/d42dYaw67R
@ViralNewsNYC It was only about control- 2015 US Library of Congress, National Institute of Health(NIH) study results, "Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%." https://t.co/d42dYaw67R
@BobbySimes1 A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers https://t.co/nmaUNxLdzp
@ShelbyGrahm @Unclejuzzy @CheshireHerald A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers https://t.co/nmaUNxLdzp
@Jason_Abate @NjbBari3 A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers https://t.co/nmaUNxLdzp
@ResterContent @Fiona_M_Russell A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers https://t.co/nmaUNxLdzp
@DanishScience @BostonBloodSox @LaGrecca333 A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers https://t.co/nmaUNxLdzp
@DailyCaller Amazing that 'Media' portrays themselves as know all G-ds, and wants us believe they are 100% ignorant to researching Lewy Body Dementia. In medias defense they hoarded to SHEEPLE A+ with wearing a 97% ineffective at stopping particle mask- .GOV website https://t.co/d42dYaw67R
@AAC0519 @jewmeini @nytimes According to random control trial result, cloth masks are associated with increased infections. This is how we know that, very likely, mask mandates were not about reducing spread. https://t.co/iIdbCyk2z6
@NewsmaxHealth @NEWSMAX 54% effective at what? lmao The "Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%." Read that: 97% ineffective at stopping particles but billions of ignorant sheeple still wore them lmfao *2015/.GOV WEBSITE/NIH-NCBI https://t.co/d42dYaw67R
@brixwe Epstein Isle Visitor= Puppet For Left- REAL LIFE/2015/NIH-NCBI-.GOV WEBSITE: 'Results: Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%." '...And the sheep go baaaaaa, the sheep go baaaa..." https://t.co/d42dYaw67R
@NEWSMAX These reports are 500% BOGUS. There's estimated 9 MILLION+ border crossers in the past 3 years alone with NO JOBS- HELLO... Covid was only to rate the level of Credulity crippling our nation '97% ineffective at stopping particle' cloth masks/NIH .GOV 2015 https://t.co/d42dYaw67R
@mcfunny @Scary7Dr @krebiozen @doritmi @AnnLove4All @Kathmarval @ASchifty @ShaneAKAProp @WotsOnInfo @BurgerLab12 @BB0941167867205 @TheFrankmanMN @dann58638436 @Pouldeau61 @bjurrows @AphasiaAnomic @sduncanhealth @shinko_hadoken @Arkout3 @TakethatCt @runhack @cappsie @raoulduke49 @crabb_vicki @taurusg333 @RN_MSN_Snark @Danny459673 @WendyOrent @DaveBla81093404 @MsTrixter @TonyBaduy @Hurriquake @MONTMAN9500 @StuWizzle @Golfergirl2018 @encyclopath @1_TMF_ @Fornowago @FUDyou2 @Catheri49917567 @RadioColor @tonymac5 @groin_hammer @CyclopsSeesAll @ScienceMonkey0 @Just4TheCause @zendogbreath Cloth masks and surgical masks don't work in routine use by healthcare workers. MacIntyre BMJ 2015 https://t.co/IsZQSzTVGf
@stkirsch Concluded in 2015 that cloth masks are 97% ineffective at stopping 'particles' and medical masks as 44% ineffective. .GOV website, NIH/NCBI... "Baaaaaa," say the sheep https://t.co/d42dYaw67R
@indynetco @doulbedoink @VoidOfRoses @PatTheSocialist https://t.co/Z73N2j1Z0Y https://t.co/L6Um59Y57t https://t.co/pahYQUCW6i https://t.co/lC7lgrUHlU https://t.co/y2afpoHXAe https://t.co/CcFIew3MRb Is that enough? https://t.co/MsWkR2AHHk
@online_shogun @brixwe "However, as a precautionary measure, cloth masks should not be recommended for HCWs, particularly in high-risk situations, and guidelines need to be updated." "Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%." **2015 .gov... https://t.co/d42dYaw67R
@14Josegar @frantastikko @GeoingenieriaMu @FisionB @cromatic7 @20m https://t.co/cZfj1YrWOI
@Marco_Esp_Ita @ituerahipster @albertoortegana @scipio91 @LMBooster Tienes este estudio experimental https://t.co/DSUNaoVXsR y ensayo clínico en personal sanitario de mascarillas de tela vs. quirúrgicas https://t.co/1PrNoHRZST y mascarillas quirúrgicas vs. FFP2 https://t.co/bsIES8t3tW y https://t.co/9oPgi2AswU
@RogerSeheult @ParentMishmash @LaurieADen @DrCHuber Study on cloth masks https://t.co/s8PGpyuoK2
@RetiredNYCPD 'A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers' ***2015/.GOV website/US Library of Congress report: "Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%." https://t.co/d42dYaw67R
@NEWSMAX "Baaaaaaaa, Baaaaaaaa," say the sheeple- April 2015: A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers Results: "Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%." .GOV Website** https://t.co/d42dYaw67R
@ImMeme0 And the award for naivety is presented to California, for the 27th straight year... 'Baaaaaaaa Baaaaaaa,'' say the sheeple- Nothing to see here, just a 2015 report/.GOV Website "Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%." https://t.co/d42dYaw67R
@whoshekidding @MarkAugustGuy @DanielleM877 @annaironside https://t.co/Z73N2j2wQw
@here4thebeer13 @DanielleM877 @annaironside How about this one? https://t.co/Z73N2j1Z0Y
@DanielleM877 @annaironside Here's an older one from 2015. Cloth masks as they were pushing increase the risk of infection. https://t.co/Z73N2j2wQw
@blackwidow_94 @DanielleM877 @annaironside https://t.co/Z73N2j1Z0Y
@DanPierce3 @mollyroxit @Arkypatriot @badlibtakes https://t.co/eLYUwVuUQ6
@CBSEveningNews Is CBS or any bullshit peddler include the 9 million homeless, jobless illegal aliens roaming around America in reports or is CBS/BS Peddlers still playing the credulity card? Wear your mask(97% ineffective at stopping particles/2015/US Library Congress). https://t.co/d42dYaw67R
@News12NJ How long are you 63 hour certificate holders gonna play the 'credulity card'? Make sure to wear your 'Baaaaaa' 2015, .GOV/US Library of Congress Report 'Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%' https://t.co/d42dYaw67R
@CBSNews Everyone knows that to be a licensed journalist only requires a 63 hour course... I guess when BILLIONS of ppl wear something 97% ineffective, BSers run with public credulity "Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%.https://t.co/d42dYaw67R
@LanceCo20874308 @libertytarian 1. The cloth masks they were mandating cause an increased risk of infection. https://t.co/Z73N2j1Z0Y
@ViralNewsNYC Answer to 'What the end game is', is simple, it's The Cloward-Piven Strategy with a: just pre-WWII opening act... After BILLIONS showed off their credulity, NIH/NCBI .GOV website concluded in 2015 that cloth masks are 97% ineffective at stopping particles https://t.co/d42dYaw67R
@danasimon @RayBake @IAGovernor I scanned the abstract, and the group that received "medical masks" had lower rates of infection than the control group (continue usual practice). Your own article shows that "medical masks" are effective. https://t.co/NzbhT8C2dZ
@ToniLL22 @IngloriousBhere @nancy_hamm1 @GreyLady45 @Gentleman2741 @james_pidd @SaltyBitch_52 @HBergsjoe @V_Hawtmess1 @GwynninPA @TJDOGMANR2 @3Tony48 @RodneyEvans @ArmandKleinX @Rammie24 @Rightalways19 @brixwe @DameScorpio @jncojok3 @StarrAli001 @polishprincessh A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers https://t.co/Bliom60hLl
A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers... https://t.co/XjURh2sz5o
@50Words_forsnow @StevenArra MacIntyre CR, Seale H, Dung TC, Hien NT, Nga PT, Chughtai AA, et al. A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers. BMJ open. 2015;5(4):e006577.
@WeeHughie1973 @dyna_tasha @limpmodemark @KristenMeghan @BrandonStraka A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers https://t.co/VAPeNLHJ8P
@Malkira420 @justin_hart A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers "We have provided the first clinical efficacy data of cloth masks, which suggest HCWs should not use cloth masks as protection against respiratory infection." https://t.co/KHDKCIP6TP
@LestaatL @gammagoblin22 @ProfessorF @elonmusk @Robber_Baron_ References: https://t.co/MSw9tUTB0X https://t.co/MSw9tUTB0X https://t.co/vMDqKWD0Q0 https://t.co/o2vVaE1oRx https://t.co/ulpysEZ8CB
A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers #Health #healthcare via https://t.co/9o68dJj2l4 https://t.co/UogB8gEzEI
A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers #HealthCare #health via https://t.co/tLVgw47iy9 https://t.co/Xt3C4UFZqa
RT @hichachu: それでも、倫理的な問題から、マスクをしていない対照群を用意することはできない(25)」。 A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthc…
それでも、倫理的な問題から、マスクをしていない対照群を用意することはできない(25)」。 A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers https://t.co/3nlIhV9SZi
A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers #Health #healthcare via https://t.co/2hdeaUcsKV https://t.co/8iqwWVT9Eo
A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers #Health #healthcare via https://t.co/YseBd8lUf9 https://t.co/UuoRlJGCiX
A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers #HealthCare #health via https://t.co/hrL0NCQVd3 https://t.co/bKFmadPeQx
A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers #HealthCare #health via https://t.co/Yd1zxcM76n https://t.co/hIdv7QqTg2
A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers #HealthCare #health via https://t.co/W87dEfFC2X https://t.co/Yx2mFWCAv7
@RealOmarNavarro NIH MED LIB c2015. A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers. Results: Penetration of cloth masks by (virus) particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%. https://t.co/xnu1pewoDt
@nelsonepega A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers https://t.co/Jdph9D4zBo
@DanFranz7 @AmalegaFrancois Non, je me suis tanné et je t'ai envoyé un article qui contient 150 études. Mais on peut continuer : A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers https://t.co/3ptGVNQmGc
RT @JoshWalkos: Study 8: “A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers” https://t.co/65VPH…
A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers | BMJ Open for @sassy_girl1000 @aaronhoyland Studies done pre covid tend to have less bias. #clothmasksdontwork #masks https://t.co/nvzLpWH4KY
A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers | BMJ Open #clothmasks #masks https://t.co/nvzLpWH4KY
RT @keithnegron2: @NickAdamsinUSA CORRECT: 2015 STUDY FROM NIH LIB - A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks…
@NickAdamsinUSA CORRECT: 2015 STUDY FROM NIH LIB - A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers. Results: "Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%." https://t.co/xnu1pewoDt
@WHO 2015 NIH LIBRARY A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers. Results: Penetration of cloth masks by (virus) particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%. https://t.co/xnu1pewoDt
@Emerson_Gravely @Jim_Jordan Cloth Mask: doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006577. The study is limited but is the only study available PRIOR to pandemic. All the other studies AFTER pandemic have confounding factors—for example, people wearing masks are more likely to perform social distancing.
@ProudElephantUS 2015 NIH STUDY: A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers. Results - Penetration of cloth masks by (virus) particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%. https://t.co/xnu1pewoDt
RT @JoshWalkos: Study 8: “A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers” https://t.co/65VPH…
RT @JoshWalkos: Study 8: “A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers” https://t.co/65VPH…
@MartinKulldorff A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers. Results: Penetration of cloth masks by (virus) particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%. https://t.co/xnu1pewoDt
Study 8: “A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers” https://t.co/65VPHhJ8nc
@lisa_iannattone 1/ masks are harmful; A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers, C Raina MacIntyre,1 Holly Seale,1 Tham Chi Dung,2 Nguyen Tran Hien,2 Phan Thi Nga,2 Abrar Ahmad Chughtai,1 Bayzidur Rahman,1 Dominic E Dwyer,3 and Quanyi Wang4
@CarlvKeirsbilck @MichaelVerstrae @RoelsMaarten euh geen onderzoek, mss toch eens de literatuur goed doornemen alvast wat DOI's: https://t.co/7x5SyBsT4O ; https://t.co/y4usyk6PUj; https://t.co/24DFGANXsa; https://t.co/1Xy5cBcS18; https://t.co/xkv2X3P3Wk en als je wilt er is ook nog een cochrane review van jefferson
A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers "Moisture retention, reuse of cloth masks and poor filtration may result in increased risk of infection." https://t.co/4c5AjwYKIx
A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers https://t.co/LcwGqYLWrQ
@prof_freedom https://t.co/pJ3jB1QBiS A lot of cloth masks in those pictures... pity that not only do we not know if cloth masks make it worse... but that it's a possibility from the existing literature is
RT @Alpha_Yeshua: A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers https://t.co/L1aeRtWB4W
A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers https://t.co/L1aeRtWB4W
A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers https://t.co/L1aeRtWB4W
10 A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers https://t.co/z3aWG6Zqs3
RT @Denachtzuster1: 22/4/15 - A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers https://t.co/assE…
RT @Denachtzuster1: 22/4/15 - A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers https://t.co/assE…
RT @Denachtzuster1: 22/4/15 - A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers https://t.co/assE…
RT @Denachtzuster1: 22/4/15 - A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers https://t.co/assE…
RT @Denachtzuster1: 22/4/15 - A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers https://t.co/assE…
RT @Denachtzuster1: 22/4/15 - A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers https://t.co/assE…
RT @Denachtzuster1: 22/4/15 - A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers https://t.co/assE…
22/4/15 - A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers https://t.co/assEydeOd6 https://t.co/5ZX2zGaJkI
RT @Denachtzuster1: 22/4/15 - A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers https://t.co/assE…
22/4/15 - A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers https://t.co/assEydeOd6 https://t.co/IqVdYfBZfl
A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers https://t.co/3xrZy0VeTa
@meleeasian @bo00mer @CTVVancouver @PennyDaflos A study from 2015 on 1607 Health Care Workers... Completely Ignored. A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers https://t.co/4o1Y3x8mdl
A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers https://t.co/H2m0mi2V4b
@curiousdatacat @KarenMFletcher1 @CDCgov Actually only one randomized controlled study of cloth masks was conducted according to the cdc and the results concluded not to recommend them for HCWs. https://t.co/z8kg4UzMip
@tppw1999 @louise_marwick This is the list of SCIENTIFIC papers describing the results of scientific tests, reviewed in good journals. I am waiting for scientific discussion now: https://t.co/PENJ5agZBD https://t.co/Ch7gSQNgfd https://t.co/ZGOnQc2tj7 https://t.co/OYp8G3IM7I https://t.co/dhnM8rtRe5
@millie_hillie @OneFineJay I quote tweeted an actual peer reviewed randomized study that says so. MacIntyre CR, Seale H, Dung TC, Hien NT, Nga PT, Chughtai AA, et al. A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers. BMJ Open. 2015;5:e006577
@LyraEvansOtt If it is important to you to make an informed decision based on real science, you need to watch this clip before your voting session. "Unmasking masks"
A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers https://t.co/nDHPKwe47W
@vreni_muller @AK_Meier Macintyr et. al. - a cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers "This study is the first RCT of cloth masks, and the results caution against the use of cloth masks. This is an important finding to inform occupational health (1/2)
Fauci and these goons have known since 2015 that cloth masks didn't work. And yet they still forced you to wear masks, why trust these people? A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers C Raina MacIntyre et al. BMJ Open. 2015. https://t.co/1m9gTlPY1c
A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers - PubMed https://t.co/kBInBxzV8U
RT @palomino3rd: ああ、「五年前のイギリスの医学誌」と合致するなら、ここが大元っぽいような。 BMJ Journal April 2015 - Volume 5 - 4 : C MacIntyre,H Seale,…… " A cluster randomis…
"little more than facial decorations"? There's been good evidence for years, as this randomised controlled trial from the British Medical Journal suggests: 'A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers' https://t.co/xrn6MSVDry
A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers https://t.co/rvHfYFQBm2
@playtechdk @SSI_dk A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers https://t.co/qJDt1z8IYV "Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%".
@signe_munk A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers https://t.co/qJDt1z8IYV Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%.
@ThomMohr @Climatree @florianaigner 2015-03-26 Macintyr et. al. - a cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers https://t.co/BcAwkULf6h
@OsbornBrett @TimRunsHisMouth Masks have always been ineffective, and we’ve always known it. https://t.co/0gDrslI6uO
@Alt_JS @DrTeePhD @AngelaTilby @calvinrobinson @10DowningStreet https://t.co/5Ndkye4NEJ
@AngelaTilby @calvinrobinson @10DowningStreet It increases infection--cloth masks remember. Plus, what about God? https://t.co/5Ndkye4NEJ
@MartinKulldorff Again !!!!! this is the 5th study that shows that masks dont work for respiratory virus, check the others: https://t.co/NWmFfX51ki https://t.co/CnLiGemVyF https://t.co/zM7uHaMGRn https://t.co/a4vj9D118s
@twinkrevsam Macintyre et al. (2015) found that reusable cloth masks likely *increase* the chances of influenza infection as opposed to wearing nothing at all (https://t.co/dnDPkHiw0p)
@CNN @smerconish This is non scientific. By the away the RCT exist and they do not support masks for respiratory virus, check the DOI for the papers: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006577 10.7326/M20-6817 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.11.002 10.1001/jama.2019.11645
@grueknowwho @asheville More studies. https://t.co/xY5v3G2cjs
@Batman4America @SebGorka @Moms4Liberty This is not study with fluid dynamics. There are particules you can not see: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006577 10.7326/M20-6817 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.11.002 10.1001/jama.2019.11645
@PDfh7gk @SebGorka @EdChainsaw No is not: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006577 10.7326/M20-6817 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.11.002 10.1001/jama.2019.11645
@Mota__one @JoaoLuisAguiar Achas que as mascaras fazem algo ?? Ensaios Clinicos RAndomizados dizem o contrário: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006577 10.7326/M20-6817 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.11.002 10.1001/jama.2019.11645 Sim exactamente o contrario que passa nos MEDIA !!!
@PencilBloke @steve50064821 @DaphneRomneyQC Cloth masks may increase the risk of contracting Covid-19 and other respiratory infections. BMJ Open 2015; 5: e006577, US National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006577, April 22, 2015. https://t.co/0NlKfBfyhA
@MonicaGandhi9 Also 4 RCT have proven that masks don t prevent infection or transmission of respiratory virus: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006577 10.7326/M20-6817 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.11.002 10.1001/jama.2019.11645 Reducing viral load......maybe....... i trust Monica Gandhi :)
@AlanBixter @FatEmperor No they don t work to stop the spread or transmission of respiratory virus, several Randomize Clinical Trials say so: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006577 10.7326/M20-6817 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.11.002 10.1001/jama.2019.11645 @FatEmperor
@FozzyBearPDX @MonicaGandhi9 @voxdotcom So why the death per milion in California, New York, New Jersey is so closed to Texas or Florida ?? RCT prove masks don t prevent infection. How do we now if they reduce inoculation ?? 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006577 10.7326/M20-6817 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.11.002 10.1001/jama.2019.11645
@vicki_martinez @MonicaGandhi9 @voxdotcom So why the death per milion in California, New York, New Jersey is so closed to Texas or Florida ?? RCT prove masks don t prevent infection. How do we now if they reduce inoculation ?? 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006577 10.7326/M20-6817 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.11.002 10.1001/jama.2019.11645
@NickiLynnDNP @MonicaGandhi9 @voxdotcom So why the death per milion in California, New York, New Jersey is so closed to Texas or Florida ?? RCT prove masks don t prevent infection. How do we now if they reduce inoculation ?? 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006577 10.7326/M20-6817 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.11.002 10.1001/jama.2019.11645
@sonarhack @MonicaGandhi9 @voxdotcom No such study exists, the contrary that prove masks don t work with RCT is better: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006577 10.7326/M20-6817 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.11.002 10.1001/jama.2019.11645
@MonicaGandhi9 @voxdotcom So why the death per milion in California, New York, New Jersey is so closed to Texas or Florida ?? RCT prove masks don t prevent infection. How do we now if they reduce inoculation ?? 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006577 10.7326/M20-6817 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.11.002 10.1001/jama.2019.11645
RT @Udadisi: "Published online 2015 Apr 22. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006577"
"Published online 2015 Apr 22. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006577" https://t.co/ZggSQbI68Y
"Published online 2015 Apr 22. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006577" https://t.co/gEXxNF6N0D
@ivaningrad @ItSandorfi @gaab75 Y sólo 2 del grupo que no usan mascarilla. Conclusión: no es cierta la afirmación de que el uso de mascarillas de tela sea peor que no usar mascarilla en base a ese estudio. Que si alguien tiene curiosidad es este. https://t.co/RY66gTvJMk
@MackayIM @EdsardRavelli BMJ Open 2015;5: e006577. doi:10.1136/ bmjopen-2014-006577 and the Danish study published somewhere in October, early November.
@CoojeeBear @chrisvalenzia @FatEmperor Here is one: https://t.co/kpoQEat3R6
RT @4_trading: Cloth #MasksDontWork A randomized clinical trial of 1607 HCWs showed that cloth masks only block 3% of particles. Also, ma…
Cloth #MasksDontWork A randomized clinical trial of 1607 HCWs showed that cloth masks only block 3% of particles. Also, masks may add danger due to re-use and moisture retention. MacIntyre CR, et al. BMJ Open 2015;5:e006577. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006577 https://t.co/bOzNsBauXm
@spinnershells A few links to scientific and anecdotal evidence and that masks work: https://t.co/MIR9JD2V1v https://t.co/a6tm2cFDql https://t.co/q8VLfwN3L8 https://t.co/ZSTALSLWWg https://t.co/jz7TdUkpcv https://t.co/V5rHZYhtag https://t.co/th851FU3dV https://t.co/hbjSNFzcYb
@harryhol @Deckers_D @tuxje1 @pat_data_man @willemrulez MacIntyre CR, Seale H, Dung TC, et al. A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers. BMJ Open 2015;5: e006577. doi:10.1136/ bmjopen-2014-006577 Lees deze eerst maar. Nu geen zin om verder te zoeken.
@insekteleider @harryhol @willemrulez Lees dit onderzoek even: MacIntyre CR, Seale H, Dung TC, et al. A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers. BMJ Open 2015;5: e006577. doi:10.1136/ bmjopen-2014-006577 Er zijn geen onderzoeken die de werking van kapjes aantonen.
RT @WEschenbach: 7/7 …by not wearing a cloth mask such as you might wear. They do nothing, in the only scientific randomized controlled tri…
@tinekelambeck @lorelei3112 Was het maar waar. Dan hadden we nu veel minder positief geteste personen in Europa. Zie bijgesloten onderzoek uit 2015 A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers. BMJ Open 2015;5: e006577. doi:10.1136/ bmjopen-2014-006577
@herotravels @Any1Yet @lorelei3112 Zie deze studie: MacIntyre CR, Seale H, Dung TC, et al. A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers. BMJ Open 2015;5: e006577. doi:10.1136/ bmjopen-2014-006577
@AeonCoin @4_keegz @zorinaq Go look at the curves of countries that don't have mask mandates they look the same. If masks did something you should be able to see the mandate moment in the charts. You can't. Also check this publication: doi:10.1136/ bmjopen-2014-006577
@SeanTrende https://t.co/P2YV4JaEDZ still healthcare workers but controls with clothe masks
@BroadyNate CDC website lists one study on cloth masks. It demonstrates that not only do they not work, they increase risk of disease: https://t.co/IYZTtcUUci
@Gregster29 @SaltySeaDog7 If this is sarcasm, I applaud this simplicity. If its real - educate yourself. Studies exist; I've read most of them. It slows the economy, scares people and for zero upside. https://t.co/9gx1N1Uhyp
Publicação de 2015 já comprovava em estudo a ineficiência das máscaras de tecido. Fonte: BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006577 on 22 April 2015. https://t.co/otHPWT0313
RT @WEschenbach: 7/7 …by not wearing a cloth mask such as you might wear. They do nothing, in the only scientific randomized controlled tri…
RT @WEschenbach: 7/7 …by not wearing a cloth mask such as you might wear. They do nothing, in the only scientific randomized controlled tri…
@RobertMauriceS1 @GeraldKutney This study concluded that a Typical Cloth mask results in statistically more infections than no mask at all. https://t.co/URknQi394l https://t.co/M2l1xCxYVd
RT @WEschenbach: 7/7 …by not wearing a cloth mask such as you might wear. They do nothing, in the only scientific randomized controlled tri…
RT @WEschenbach: 7/7 …by not wearing a cloth mask such as you might wear. They do nothing, in the only scientific randomized controlled tri…
RT @WEschenbach: 7/7 …by not wearing a cloth mask such as you might wear. They do nothing, in the only scientific randomized controlled tri…
RT @WEschenbach: 7/7 …by not wearing a cloth mask such as you might wear. They do nothing, in the only scientific randomized controlled tri…
RT @WEschenbach: 7/7 …by not wearing a cloth mask such as you might wear. They do nothing, in the only scientific randomized controlled tri…
RT @WEschenbach: 7/7 …by not wearing a cloth mask such as you might wear. They do nothing, in the only scientific randomized controlled tri…
RT @WEschenbach: 7/7 …by not wearing a cloth mask such as you might wear. They do nothing, in the only scientific randomized controlled tri…
RT @WEschenbach: 7/7 …by not wearing a cloth mask such as you might wear. They do nothing, in the only scientific randomized controlled tri…
RT @WEschenbach: 7/7 …by not wearing a cloth mask such as you might wear. They do nothing, in the only scientific randomized controlled tri…
RT @WEschenbach: 7/7 …by not wearing a cloth mask such as you might wear. They do nothing, in the only scientific randomized controlled tri…
RT @WEschenbach: 7/7 …by not wearing a cloth mask such as you might wear. They do nothing, in the only scientific randomized controlled tri…
RT @WEschenbach: 7/7 …by not wearing a cloth mask such as you might wear. They do nothing, in the only scientific randomized controlled tri…
7/7 …by not wearing a cloth mask such as you might wear. They do nothing, in the only scientific randomized controlled trial they INCREASED infection, and besides ... ... I AM grandpa. w. (Paper is paywalled, here's the SciHub link.) https://t.co/w8G5tRHgBJ
Watch ""Unmasking Masks: The Science Behind Mask Efficacy" - September 2020 - with Suhayb Yunus" on YouTube https://t.co/n7vL7KOpvE
"Unmasking Masks the Science Behind Mask Efficacy" - September 2020 - wi... https://t.co/s0ZRuNSZ8H via @YouTube
Masking the truth in fear is what is going on but the sheeple
@Sabrina__Carol @marsilcos @sousa26_ "A retenção de umidade, a reutilização de máscaras de pano e a filtragem insuficiente podem resultar em maior risco de infecção." Fonte: https://t.co/KHM7GGCEqx
@AnnaKorhonen3 Mihin väitteesi perustuu? Maskein hyödystä epidemian ehkäisyssä on todella heikosti tieteellisesti pätevää dataa. Yhdessä korkealuokkaisessa satunnaistetussa vertailututkimuksessa niiden havaittiin päinvastoin lisäävän tartuntoja: https://t.co/hpKKGrxhls
@SadiqKhan cloth masks let 97% of particles through, no protection https://t.co/9DvBULjjO0
RT @Studentin444: #Stoffmasken, Studie - "die Ergebnisse warnen vor der Verwendung von Stoffmasken. Feuchtigkeitsrückstände, Wiederverwendu…
RT @Studentin444: #Stoffmasken, Studie - "die Ergebnisse warnen vor der Verwendung von Stoffmasken. Feuchtigkeitsrückstände, Wiederverwendu…
RT @Studentin444: #Stoffmasken, Studie - "die Ergebnisse warnen vor der Verwendung von Stoffmasken. Feuchtigkeitsrückstände, Wiederverwendu…
#Stoffmasken, Studie - "die Ergebnisse warnen vor der Verwendung von Stoffmasken. Feuchtigkeitsrückstände, Wiederverwendung und schlechte Filterung können zu einem erhöhten Infektionsrisiko führen!" https://t.co/wH2z9eLkzP
@EdieMeade @DanaRBrown16 A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers. BMJ Open , 2015; 5 (4): e006577 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006577 Cite This Page :
@BrunoCidado @gk_storeLi @ArthurWeint https://t.co/kgUtgNKhCa
@itsyasminaqg @SolomonPuryear @roxannnadiaz This is from a study called, "A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers," available at doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006577. Cloth masks are not as good as medical masks. They're far better than no mask.
@ishooku https://t.co/jvmT6aTTJh https://t.co/cbPP8Z1PFq
Randomized Controlled Trial BMJ Open . 2015 Apr 22;5(4):e006577. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006577. A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers https://t.co/ol8I5Ab0FD https://t.co/ta0YTyE5PW
@174all @Cleavon_MD The BMJ article was not saying NOT to wear masks. It was saying Health Professionals should NOT wear cloth masks but ones like N95. It said further study is required for public use of cloth masks as it drew no conclusion that. https://t.co/qgW6WvkXHq
@ThomasVConti @jeremyphoward Não serve! Sem pirotécnia, apenas um estudo bem conduzido: https://t.co/KvgP9VY67l
@clarionrox Claro que há. Ele tem lido a literatura científica e sabe que máscaras de tecido comum tem efeito contrário ao esperado: https://t.co/KvgP9VY67l Seria bom se os paniquetes estudassem também!
@Toboinetsu @therealcliffyb https://t.co/KKEwTTpCjs https://t.co/sh1DCaSL3J https://t.co/6nRKOGXgyh https://t.co/Z27z9AHo4l https://t.co/HtC3U2YKVC https://t.co/WDHA9Oh3n1 Enjoy your reading bud
#ThisMorning Why isn't anyone asking for evidence that cloth masks can help prevent the spread of the virus -there is medical research out there that suggests they are useless -this is a link to one that had been reported in the BMJ reference 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006577
#thismorning Why isn't anyone asking for evidence that cloth masks can help prevent the spread of the virus -there is medical research out there that suggests they are useless -this is a link to one that had been reported in the BMJ reference 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006577
布マスク配布を中止にしてほしい。 政府は、病院にも医療者用に布マスクを送ったそうだ。布マスクに感染予防効果はない( https://t.co/wYGW21SQAw )。 「布マスク2枚の予算があれば、医療従事者3ヶ月分」 マスク輸入業者、嘆く https://t.co/kRtlIlIdNf @nonbeepandaより
@CDCgov, @CDCflu, @CDCDirector In the linked study, it seems cloth masks are actually worse than no masks. Can you comment on your position supporting their use? Is this study accurate? https://t.co/lrFMDMg8i2
布マスク使用の是非 A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers https://t.co/wYGW21SQAw
https://t.co/kMx8HfBVD4 これがそこそこまとまっている感じか。2020-03-11. > It’s unclear how relevant this finding would be in community settings, especially if the objective is source control. This finding は https://t.co/IJVGv4Jcr3
@elakdawalla This is the big study people cite against cloth masks: doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006577
@DreamMcClinton This study found cloth did worse than other masks at preventing resp. infections, but they weren't comparing cloth to nothing. https://t.co/r41n7jwJAZ
RT @h_okumura: https://t.co/x9WuUjWFMc か。しかしこのcontrolはno maskではないusual practice, which included mask wearingなので，マスクとしては良くないということしかわからない htt…
RT @h_okumura: https://t.co/x9WuUjWFMc か。しかしこのcontrolはno maskではないusual practice, which included mask wearingなので，マスクとしては良くないということしかわからない htt…
RT @h_okumura: https://t.co/x9WuUjWFMc か。しかしこのcontrolはno maskではないusual practice, which included mask wearingなので，マスクとしては良くないということしかわからない htt…
RT @h_okumura: https://t.co/x9WuUjWFMc か。しかしこのcontrolはno maskではないusual practice, which included mask wearingなので，マスクとしては良くないということしかわからない htt…
RT @h_okumura: https://t.co/x9WuUjWFMc か。しかしこのcontrolはno maskではないusual practice, which included mask wearingなので，マスクとしては良くないということしかわからない htt…
RT @h_okumura: https://t.co/x9WuUjWFMc か。しかしこのcontrolはno maskではないusual practice, which included mask wearingなので，マスクとしては良くないということしかわからない htt…
RT @h_okumura: https://t.co/x9WuUjWFMc か。しかしこのcontrolはno maskではないusual practice, which included mask wearingなので，マスクとしては良くないということしかわからない htt…
RT @h_okumura: https://t.co/x9WuUjWFMc か。しかしこのcontrolはno maskではないusual practice, which included mask wearingなので，マスクとしては良くないということしかわからない htt…
RT @h_okumura: https://t.co/x9WuUjWFMc か。しかしこのcontrolはno maskではないusual practice, which included mask wearingなので，マスクとしては良くないということしかわからない htt…
RT @h_okumura: https://t.co/x9WuUjWFMc か。しかしこのcontrolはno maskではないusual practice, which included mask wearingなので，マスクとしては良くないということしかわからない htt…
RT @h_okumura: https://t.co/x9WuUjWFMc か。しかしこのcontrolはno maskではないusual practice, which included mask wearingなので，マスクとしては良くないということしかわからない htt…
RT @h_okumura: https://t.co/x9WuUjWFMc か。しかしこのcontrolはno maskではないusual practice, which included mask wearingなので，マスクとしては良くないということしかわからない htt…
https://t.co/x9WuUjWFMc か。しかしこのcontrolはno maskではないusual practice, which included mask wearingなので，マスクとしては良くないということしかわからない https://t.co/iFZMrufU3e