Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The discussions reflect a range of attitudes towards the publication, with some users citing meta-analyses and FDA statements, such as '1-2 per day have little to no serious effect,' which shows moderate engagement and interest. Others, like 'cancer gonna cancer,' reveal dismissiveness, contributing to a nuanced overall perception.
The discussions show mixed opinions, with some posts supporting the idea that low levels of cigar smoking may have minimal effects, while others dismiss the risks entirely.
Participants demonstrate moderate interest, with some referencing specific data and meta-analyses, indicating a focus on the scientific aspects of the study.
Many discussions involve pointing out inaccuracies, requesting clarifications, or referencing additional research, showing active engagement.
While some posts highlight potential health risks, others downplay the significance, resulting in a balanced perception of user influence.
@LivePippas Pipe smoking is associated with lung cancer but at a slightly lower rate than cigarettes According to this review 2-8x ⤵️ Cigarettes increase the risk about 10x, or more for heavier smokers. Also males >female Was there secondhand smoke as well? https://t.co/awmtF1Ukwt
Even when not inhaling, you still have an elevated mortality risk for oral, esophageal and laryngeal cancers (DOI: 10.1186/s12889-015-1617-5 ). This risks are further increased when flavored cigars are introduced (Peruns note: these cigars are of lower quality; avoid them)
@nahumg_ld @fastrlife https://t.co/FSUXDlOWei
@ddoublepivot @Tripolar_B this is true but cancer gonna cancer https://t.co/Go48dg6F6u https://t.co/88hiBjtgo8
@woke8yearold There are no measurable effects on health for smoking 1-2 cigars per day. Multiple meta-analyses show this. Example: https://t.co/DVmLaJdCH3
@dspillane1 Here's a better study form the exact same place since your so interested. https://t.co/mENP23qRo9 https://t.co/CAPL43IAqB
Discover the world of cigars with our Basic Cigar Course, covering sensory experience, traditional techniques, and responsible enjoyment. Learn about health risks associated with cigar smoking, emphasizing moderation…
Systematic review of cigar smoking and all-cause, smoking-related mortality. The study shows increased risks of cancers and heart disease associated with cigar use, even for non-inhalers, emphasizing the need for…
@wanyeburkett https://t.co/DVmLaJdCH3 https://t.co/8fLqpIGt4K
@richardstoicj @RichDuszak @sweatystartup @RustyKu37492320 Ummm.. looks bad to me https://t.co/VelukpHxEI
@RichDuszak @sweatystartup @RustyKu37492320 How about cigars? FDA says 1-2 per day have little to no serious effect. https://t.co/A6L45nKk4W
@woke8yearold There are no measurable effects on health for smoking 1-2 cigars per day. Multiple meta-analyses show this. Example: https://t.co/DVmLaJdCH3
@gleichung_ @AdrianGFuentes https://t.co/rlzI5Kzytg
@nahumg_ld @fastrlife https://t.co/FSUXDlOWei
@farsideenjoyer @TonyAcostaUS @theStoicRook @fastrlife Please be silent. Cigars are equally harmful. https://t.co/FSUXDlPu3Q
@NPlafcanx3 @fastrlife This is one of the same excuses teenagers use to justify vaping. Cigars are equally harmful. https://t.co/FSUXDlOWei
@theStoicRook @Finance_Weights @fastrlife https://t.co/aER1BNU9Th
@JuPeterrj @Elenny_77 @europapress https://t.co/41ziBYh8JD
@Rarisma_ @exposetobacco You may be relatively sure, but you're absolutely wrong. https://t.co/VZuvgIcVOd https://t.co/FZ9tghvTkG
source: https://t.co/cBV8JQPhgO source 2: https://t.co/qPqFP8WKgn
RT @ColinMendelsohn: @LivePippas Pipe smoking is associated with lung cancer but at a slightly lower rate than cigarettes According to this…
RT @ColinMendelsohn: @LivePippas Pipe smoking is associated with lung cancer but at a slightly lower rate than cigarettes According to this…
@LivePippas Pipe smoking is associated with lung cancer but at a slightly lower rate than cigarettes According to this review 2-8x ⤵️ Cigarettes increase the risk about 10x, or more for heavier smokers. Also males >female Was there secondhand smoke as well? https://t.co/awmtF1Ukwt
@dspillane1 Here's a better study form the exact same place since your so interested. https://t.co/mENP23qRo9 https://t.co/CAPL43IAqB
@ddoublepivot @Tripolar_B this is true but cancer gonna cancer https://t.co/Go48dg6F6u https://t.co/88hiBjtgo8
@MrsProudley @Morpheusresist https://t.co/Fbb8CCJpXL You were saying?
@HazelAzureus @Lin_kuei255 @ShaykhSulaiman Where did you get that figure? Smoking 1-2 premium cigars daily has a nill effect on cancer risk. Most smokers are in or below that range. https://t.co/Fbb8CCJpXL
@MrsProudley @Morpheusresist https://t.co/OPvCu1thGU 1-2 cigars daily has near to zero effect on cancer risk. Cigars are pure tobacco and aren’t inhaled. Also, he has requested medical aid numerous times in jail. As the papers allude, he was supposed to have a biopsy in January.
@DIY_Tardis @UrosMikolic "Mortality risks from cigar smoking vary by level of exposure as measured by cigars per day and inhalation level and can be as high as or exceed those of cigarette smoking. " https://t.co/FnxzVu5mcP
Even when not inhaling, you still have an elevated mortality risk for oral, esophageal and laryngeal cancers (DOI: 10.1186/s12889-015-1617-5 ). This risks are further increased when flavored cigars are introduced (Peruns note: these cigars are of lower quality; avoid them)
@MllcKenzie Like they say things that are so obviously wrong that it takes ten seconds to find out
@engcountrylife According to US FDA https://t.co/G3ADJwKMoa The cancer risk is nearly nil for smoming 1-2 cigars per day. You read that right. The issue is that not all tobacco products are created equal and should not be treated in the same way...even though public perception says otherwise.
@TarqLongJohnson @WolffintheWild @michaeljknowles I didn't know you owned a cherry farm? Also I love how you cropped your search because it's obvious you didn't go looking for the data, you had an answer in mind and didn't want it to be wrong. Why not try reading it and understand it's a meta-analysis https://t.co/9JaNuL1AcP https://t.co/uNDm4GJTLI
@ddofinternet @vichu2005g It wouldn't cause lung cancer then, but it does https://t.co/UjvvhNmKcz
@ja_reynolds You can't seriously look at that meta analysis in the BMC and say there is danger in 1-2 cigars. https://t.co/4yDKQFHaE4
@JeremiahEXE https://t.co/tiXzRK5J12 Look at the table. Effect estimates here on all studies are just above 1. 1 is no risk.
@JeremiahEXE https://t.co/Ry3MqtGtVS
DM
P
SW
F
CN
A
D
RJ
EA
SP
D
CN
AK
P
RS
GB
TG
MG
I
DW
H
DI
م