Sex Differences in Variability in General Intelligence: A New Look at the Old Question.

IB

Inquisitive Bird

@Scientific_Bird · X

@SilverVVulpes https://t.co/u2HfWENa1J https://t.co/094afOybts

RS

RE-OPEN THE SIZZLERS

@SaladBarFan · X

@EAlluia @Rabadash2 @RichardHanania @mattyglesias I just DM’d my mutual who’s an expert on this and he said the the greater male variability hypotheses has been confined and is generally accepted in the field. He sent me these 3 papers: https://t.co/hnPyMSQQy4

HB

Hasan G. Bahçekapılı

@InsanEvrim · X

4. Erkek-kadın ortalamalarının aynı olduğu durumlarda bile erkeklerin daha heterojen puanlara sahip olmaları, yani hem en üstte hem en altta daha fazla temsil edilmeleri Darwin'den beri bilinen ve muhtemelen biyolojik temeli olan bir olgu. https://t.co/yzaMcrrRrP

TX

TRAJIMOS A HERRERA Y VINO XAVI

@lucaerc_ · X

@NinjaHomosexual Hay miles de estudios al respeto tonto a pedal https://t.co/Oj01LfoPiK https://t.co/tSbgL2wqoC

RY

Reichel 3ra(you/your/yogurt)

@elreich3ro · X

@WendyScarlet5 @Ravalo_Twitr @LibWeebGirl @Ale122704 @AnnieFemMas @LabMemberOO2 1.https://t.co/epUnWYr6xy 2.https://t.co/y5DEVYzQG0 3.https://t.co/Pk9mzJZAJp 4.https://t.co/sW7NdlOWGR

S

Sean

@BlackAdder256 · X

@W96Emily If you believe the science: https://t.co/Nz5YxYONcp

AC

A. Egon Cholakian

@ScottH30599 · X

@UR__FUTURE__BF @oldfalsash @artemlucis @DreamLeaf5 @7Trihard20484 https://t.co/hvP9hpxPov https://t.co/aVY5JzAyO8 https://t.co/RS2AzpABMQ

RS

RE-OPEN THE SIZZLERS

@SaladBarFan · X

@Eli_B_Again @andyeven @hollowearthterf https://t.co/hnPyMSQiIw

L

Lola

@Lo_l_a_ · X

@witte_sergei Gross oversimplification. The actual distributions aren't even normal. Sex Differences in Variability in General Intelligence: A New Look at the Old Question Johnson et al 2008 https://t.co/iCqTVYFP8O

CB

Claude F. Bastiat

@ClaudeFBastiat · X

@Cal1995I @AshbyM @AutismCapital I believe that number is low, as IQ distribution has been found to vary wrt the third ("skew") and 4th (kurtosis aka "fat tails") moments. Was curious myself so did a quick search, found this: https://t.co/qQbXYoV6ab

E

Eliot

@heliod7 · X

@HERRTOT @HernanGomezB @JMilei De hecho el hombre vive menos porque en efecto "hay más hombres idiotas" Las distribuciones probabilísticas indican que los hombres rigen en los extremos del IQ, teniendo a la mayoría de la población con menor IQ y la mayoría de la población con mayor IQ https://t.co/OM8iGFY39c https://t.co/REeWjJloJn

DD

Dawning_of_Dusk

@Dawning_of_Dusk · X

@pimenlit @clowntiddey @MuseObserving @Geisterjger4 @agraybee https://t.co/kPf7izSaRV

MM

Merkels Memoiren

@MerkelsMemoiren · X

@Ypsvw_ @_lea_li Hier es ist Usus: https://t.co/wUOt6DiYNC

MM

Merkels Memoiren

@MerkelsMemoiren · X

@Ypsvw_ @_lea_li Hier Quellen dazu: https://t.co/Nsbxz1Qi7k https://t.co/aF1LJQKGpe

MM

Merkels Memoiren

@MerkelsMemoiren · X

@EnlightenStS @_lea_li Hoppla falscher Link: Hier zum selber nachvollziehen, die Varianz ist überall höher. https://t.co/aF1LJQKGpe

V

Vince

@SirXVincent · X

@Seetangens @zyankali95 @OlSta0483 @welt Die "berühmte" 2008-Edingburgh Studie: https://t.co/tCE1XYEr1D "Though present at the high end of the distribution, sex differences in variability did not appear to account for sex differences in high-level achievement." Sie schreiben selbst, ist eher nach unten relevant.

KK

Koçer Karasu

@KoerKarasu91880 · X

RT @InsanEvrim: 4. Erkek-kadın ortalamalarının aynı olduğu durumlarda bile erkeklerin daha heterojen puanlara sahip olmaları, yani hem en ü…

HB

Hasan G. Bahçekapılı

@InsanEvrim · X

4. Erkek-kadın ortalamalarının aynı olduğu durumlarda bile erkeklerin daha heterojen puanlara sahip olmaları, yani hem en üstte hem en altta daha fazla temsil edilmeleri Darwin'den beri bilinen ve muhtemelen biyolojik temeli olan bir olgu. https://t.co/yzaMcrrRrP

HA

hiro antagonist

@insipidwanker · X

RT @Scientific_Bird: @SilverVVulpes https://t.co/u2HfWENa1J https://t.co/094afOybts

IB

Inquisitive Bird

@Scientific_Bird · X

@SilverVVulpes https://t.co/u2HfWENa1J https://t.co/094afOybts

S

Sean

@BlackAdder256 · X

@W96Emily If you believe the science: https://t.co/Nz5YxYONcp

W

WoЇfgang

@1yk0s · X

@schorn_stephan "...we showed that there were substantial departures from normality in the distribution, with less variability in the higher range than in the lower." https://t.co/nbxyMuz8et

AS

Acherontia Styx

@Gerald3250425 · X

@wynwok @tailcalled @NeuroSGS https://t.co/l28Jj0wA0k https://t.co/FK4tex4foz

?

2000

@mloive2 · X

@Saa3ii_ @rp3lr8 @N_U_T__ الأذكياء اقليه جدا غالبيتهم الساحقه رجال لكن حتى المتخلفين عقليا غالبيتهم الساحقه رجال كمان النساء غالبيتهم ذكائهم طبيعي النسبه الساحقه منهم أكثر من الرجال https://t.co/0F7FRbzJUu https://t.co/967BdSmrA8

TX

TRAJIMOS A HERRERA Y VINO XAVI

@lucaerc_ · X

@NinjaHomosexual Hay miles de estudios al respeto tonto a pedal https://t.co/Oj01LfoPiK https://t.co/tSbgL2wqoC

RS

RE-OPEN THE SIZZLERS

@SaladBarFan · X

@EAlluia @Rabadash2 @RichardHanania @mattyglesias I just DM’d my mutual who’s an expert on this and he said the the greater male variability hypotheses has been confined and is generally accepted in the field. He sent me these 3 papers: https://t.co/hnPyMSQQy4

NW

Nick Westinghouse

@NikWestinghouse · X

@irondada17 @4dawolf420 @monitoringbias Here's one: https://t.co/XnqNGXdIPm There are others, including one from 1921 of thousands of Scots, which this references as well.

N

nanasi

@nanasi43 · X

RT @Chemagatari: @Malkav09 @Namurii Ah que no te gusta la wikipedia? Toma más fuentes hombre que ya veo que te gusta poco informarte. https…

N

nanasi

@nanasi43 · X

RT @CuriousnTT: I haven't explained those in a while, so here is a refresher. It is hard to find a good illustration of this (controversial…

C

Chemagatari

@Chemagatari · X

@Malkav09 @Namurii Ah que no te gusta la wikipedia? Toma más fuentes hombre que ya veo que te gusta poco informarte. https://t.co/6U7vWId0KZ https://t.co/NUWwHflbFX

TT

Trygve Taranger

@CuriousnTT · X

I haven't explained those in a while, so here is a refresher. It is hard to find a good illustration of this (controversial topic). If we have two groups with normal distributions with the same peak but different slopes, like men and women on for IQ... https://t.co/qqwnx8wVET https://t.co/1rX3TX3vq5

RY

Reichel 3ra(you/your/yogurt)

@elreich3ro · X

RT @elreich3ro: @WendyScarlet5 @Ravalo_Twitr @LibWeebGirl @Ale122704 @AnnieFemMas @LabMemberOO2 1.https://t.co/epUnWYr6xy 2.https://t.co/…

RY

Reichel 3ra(you/your/yogurt)

@elreich3ro · X

@WendyScarlet5 @Ravalo_Twitr @LibWeebGirl @Ale122704 @AnnieFemMas @LabMemberOO2 1.https://t.co/epUnWYr6xy 2.https://t.co/y5DEVYzQG0 3.https://t.co/Pk9mzJZAJp 4.https://t.co/sW7NdlOWGR

CS

CosmonautCat (@sememmon@mastodon.social)

@sememmon2 · X

@Giuoco__Piano @AditiBerlin @Rattigall @miriam_vollmer Die Autoren scheinen nicht so sicher zu sein wie du, was ihre Ergebnisse angeht. Dazu ergänzend auch diese Studie: https://t.co/DKOnpyu1hu Generell geht die Wissenschaft eher von sozialen Unterschieden aus, als von biologischen. https://t.co/wh4aXFO0bJ

UV

Uku Vainik

@ukuv · X

@saraweston09 @BrentWRoberts @DMCpersonality @mmjokela @EmorieBeck @aidangcw @SachaEpskamp @LarsPenke For instance, sex differences in variability in IQ have been convincingly demonstrated in the Scottish Mental Survey, uniquely representative and well-participated study https://t.co/lZcEgAkjqP . Do we have something similar for personality?

ON

orzeł nielot

@przeszczep9 · X

@lelouch_420 @lorrik96 https://t.co/BuDtaLUST1 Jedyna różnica w inteligencji mężczyzn i kobiet występuje w wariancji, czyli jest więcej skrajnie inteligentnych mężczyzn i niepełnosprawnych intelektualnie. Nie zamierzam prowadzić dalej dyskusji, jeżeli uciekasz się do takiej żenady, jak ad personam.

S

superhe

@superhe58452851 · X

@S_Silver93 @MartaLlanos97 hola, está hecho en relación a los datos que utilizó en esta conferencia el psicólogo Ian Deary en relación a este estudio suyo. Esta es la gráfica original que usó en su conferencia. estudio: https://t.co/HsFZUG0N0H conferencia: https://t.co/Ny9uodeyW3 https://t.co/XogomvppTT

RW

Russell T. Warne

@Russwarne · X

@TheClarksTale @rexjung @charlesmurray There is strong evidence that in very large samples, there is a surplus of people below average, prob because of brain damage. https://t.co/j88unyQ0Sr I looked for departures from normality in the top range and could not find consistent evidence for it: https://t.co/WxV4jIWSo8

B

Brantichrist

@Brantichrist · X

@critic_swedish @JL19874 @Timcast Brain https://t.co/zrwcVWuYPg https://t.co/ycBfQCYo5J https://t.co/uaf1VsL5ng https://t.co/JRu2OpdUEt https://t.co/ZH9MS85nVl Physical strength https://t.co/AThmxPbEH7 (sources in the wikipedia article) There's plenty more where this came from. But I doubt you'll be reading it.

BW

By The Well

@ByTheWell4God · X

@brucefanjoy @JohnnyBrottom9 @pepe_catalo @AMObstWriter @ksoileau @MariInTokyo @RenzoGuinto @IlonaKickbusch https://t.co/87qB9l6w0o