Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
Many participants in these discussions highlighted the article's insights into the persistence of misinformation, with comments like 'once misinformation is consumed, it is very difficult to correct' and 'the cognitive factors that feed into misinformation.' The use of terms such as 'self-reinforcing feedback loops' and 'continued influence effect' showcases how the tone is serious and analytical, indicating a thoughtful examination of the topics and contributing to a deeper engagement with the material.
The majority of discussions indicate a general agreement with the article's conclusions about the challenges of misinformation.
The strong interest level is reflected in many users expressing a desire to read the article and engage with its findings.
Users frequently reference specific methods proposed in the article, demonstrating a deep level of engagement.
While some users perceive the findings as influential, the overall sentiment suggests a mixed view on the depth of impact in addressing misinformation.
On l'avait pas vu venir, mais Keanu Reeves apparaît sur Netflix dans une série documentaire controversé qui promeut des thèses assez étranges... Faut qu'on en parle : https://t.co/pRQL8lVUux https://t.co/DZA0YZYtX8
Here is figure 1: “A graphical summary of findings from the #misinformation literature” from Lewandowsky et al (no paywall, https://t.co/T6r1R44WAZ) Solution is repeated, simple rebuttals that emphasize the correct information, framed to affirm worldview/identity. https://t.co/ZAJRlLp3yv
This article is a really nice review of the cognitive factors that feed into misinformation. https://t.co/9dFWolgYWS
12/ Sources Cited • Douglas et al. (2017) https://t.co/YtyKwJVI6j • Romer & Jamieson (2020) https://t.co/HkgEizibiZ • Cinelli et al. (2020) https://t.co/FtQlxbHmWI • Lewandowsky et al. (2012) https://t.co/9r9deHJPF3 • Imhoff & Lamberty (2020) https://t.co/E542YHUkjP
How to fight fake news (and how not to) according to the research
@JlibDoesEcon @DGoncalvesDS @Jack_J_Willis Super-interested to read but honest question - you know there's a huge psych literature on the continued influence effect, right? @UlliEcker @STWorg and many others can tell you more. don't see any of it here. one recent review https://t.co/i1xmlZLlWD
On October 16, Netflix released season 2 of 'A laube de notre histoire,' a documentary series by Graham Hancock that has sparked much discussion since its first season. This video delves into Hancock's controversial…
Arguing on the internet often leads nowhere. This video explores why arguments are unproductive and examines the influence of misinformation, such as misconceptions about vaccinations. Discover insights from science…
No BlaBlaNews this Tuesday 1605 13h Emilio Garcia discusses whether debates are effective tools for presenting and discussing opposing ideas. The study examines three vaccine misinformation correction strategies…
Esse corte parte das lives que rolam teras e quintas s 13h. Misinformation is a significant public issue, leading to health risks and increased costs. This video discusses the channels of misinformation and the…
@TRHLofficial I've seen this "no client" meme everywhere today. Cognitive research (see https://t.co/qjoY6fEyMk, for example) tells us that once misinfo is consumed, it is very difficult to correct. We on the right should strive for truth and accuracy, and we look foolish when we don't.
Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing https://t.co/PfKAm4x4Ot @ClubKimono https://t.co/oVGSvK3rUa
RT @ciaochowmeow: Bullshitting [creates] self-reinforcing feedback loops dependent on whether bullshitting enhances or diminishes the image…
This may be difficult, particularly when bullshitting has become a routinized part of formal communication. https://t.co/phUqKm9MHM https://t.co/vu2aU0csxa
Bullshitting [creates] self-reinforcing feedback loops dependent on whether bullshitting enhances or diminishes the image and identity of the bullshitter. When bullshitting enhances an actor’s image and identity, they are likely to engage in more of it. https://t.co/cIsqGx4vJV https://t.co/Je8YhtokSH
RT @IntegralAnswers: 12/ Sources Cited • Douglas et al. (2017) https://t.co/YtyKwJVI6j • Romer & Jamieson (2020) https://t.co/HkgEizibiZ •…
RT @IntegralAnswers: 12/ Sources Cited • Douglas et al. (2017) https://t.co/YtyKwJVI6j • Romer & Jamieson (2020) https://t.co/HkgEizibiZ •…
12/ Sources Cited • Douglas et al. (2017) https://t.co/YtyKwJVI6j • Romer & Jamieson (2020) https://t.co/HkgEizibiZ • Cinelli et al. (2020) https://t.co/FtQlxbHmWI • Lewandowsky et al. (2012) https://t.co/9r9deHJPF3 • Imhoff & Lamberty (2020) https://t.co/E542YHUkjP
14 ter/ et enfin -Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012). “Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing.” Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(3), 106–131. Je reconnais que ça reste à lire.
RT @patbhamilton: This looks useful. Monster and clearly influential review, "Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and…
This looks useful. Monster and clearly influential review, "Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing" .. Some similarities/overlap with misconceptions in science education. Once there - they don't go easily. https://t.co/TKsCMxXdb2 https://t.co/6G3dY1HMZv
This article, "Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing" was written in 2012. I will filter through it. But this is why we can't break through. OMG couldn't they have made it more concise and digestible, themselves? journals.sagepub.com/stoken/rbtfl...
J'ai pas de conclusion. Juste marre de voir trop de n'importe quoi et cette binarité polarisée. Et l'élection de Trump =
RT @NotaBeneMovies: On l'avait pas vu venir, mais Keanu Reeves apparaît sur Netflix dans une série documentaire controversé qui promeut des…
RT @NotaBeneMovies: On l'avait pas vu venir, mais Keanu Reeves apparaît sur Netflix dans une série documentaire controversé qui promeut des…
RT @NotaBeneMovies: On l'avait pas vu venir, mais Keanu Reeves apparaît sur Netflix dans une série documentaire controversé qui promeut des…
RT @NotaBeneMovies: On l'avait pas vu venir, mais Keanu Reeves apparaît sur Netflix dans une série documentaire controversé qui promeut des…
RT @NotaBeneMovies: On l'avait pas vu venir, mais Keanu Reeves apparaît sur Netflix dans une série documentaire controversé qui promeut des…
RT @NotaBeneMovies: On l'avait pas vu venir, mais Keanu Reeves apparaît sur Netflix dans une série documentaire controversé qui promeut des…
RT @NotaBeneMovies: On l'avait pas vu venir, mais Keanu Reeves apparaît sur Netflix dans une série documentaire controversé qui promeut des…
RT @NotaBeneMovies: On l'avait pas vu venir, mais Keanu Reeves apparaît sur Netflix dans une série documentaire controversé qui promeut des…
RT @NotaBeneMovies: On l'avait pas vu venir, mais Keanu Reeves apparaît sur Netflix dans une série documentaire controversé qui promeut des…
RT @NotaBeneMovies: On l'avait pas vu venir, mais Keanu Reeves apparaît sur Netflix dans une série documentaire controversé qui promeut des…
RT @NotaBeneMovies: On l'avait pas vu venir, mais Keanu Reeves apparaît sur Netflix dans une série documentaire controversé qui promeut des…
RT @NotaBeneMovies: On l'avait pas vu venir, mais Keanu Reeves apparaît sur Netflix dans une série documentaire controversé qui promeut des…
RT @NotaBeneMovies: On l'avait pas vu venir, mais Keanu Reeves apparaît sur Netflix dans une série documentaire controversé qui promeut des…
RT @NotaBeneMovies: On l'avait pas vu venir, mais Keanu Reeves apparaît sur Netflix dans une série documentaire controversé qui promeut des…
RT @NotaBeneMovies: On l'avait pas vu venir, mais Keanu Reeves apparaît sur Netflix dans une série documentaire controversé qui promeut des…
RT @NotaBeneMovies: On l'avait pas vu venir, mais Keanu Reeves apparaît sur Netflix dans une série documentaire controversé qui promeut des…
RT @NotaBeneMovies: On l'avait pas vu venir, mais Keanu Reeves apparaît sur Netflix dans une série documentaire controversé qui promeut des…
Keanu Reeves et la promotion de la pseudo archéologie (Graham Hancock - ... https://t.co/K9dUvTGHUO via @YouTube
RT @NotaBeneMovies: On l'avait pas vu venir, mais Keanu Reeves apparaît sur Netflix dans une série documentaire controversé qui promeut des…
Keanu Reeves et la promotion de la pseudo archéologie (Graham Hancock - ... https://t.co/uQxmTInqvc via @YouTube
Keanu Reeves et la promotion de la pseudo archéologie (Graham Hancock - ... https://t.co/frFCHeHkYs via @YouTube
Très bonne vidéo de Nota Bene... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o1QpqzMmoLs
Keanu Reeves et la promotion de la pseudo archéologie (Graham Hancock - ... https://t.co/PXwcWZ91sG via @YouTube
Keanu Reeves et la promotion de la pseudo archéologie (Graham Hancock - A l'aube de notre histoire) https://t.co/HrQkyYjI88
Ca fait vraiment plaisir d'avoir enfin une autre façon de revenir sur les fake news. Bravo @NotaBeneMovies https://t.co/bCsdoCo2mc
Debunker Graham Hancock sans vraiment debunker Graham Hancock ! @NotaBeneMovies toujours au top
RT @NotaBeneMovies: On l'avait pas vu venir, mais Keanu Reeves apparaît sur Netflix dans une série documentaire controversé qui promeut des…
Keanu Reeves et la promotion de la pseudo archéologie (Graham Hancock - ... https://t.co/zJdCONwtkT via @YouTube
RT @NotaBeneMovies: On l'avait pas vu venir, mais Keanu Reeves apparaît sur Netflix dans une série documentaire controversé qui promeut des…
RT @NotaBeneMovies: On l'avait pas vu venir, mais Keanu Reeves apparaît sur Netflix dans une série documentaire controversé qui promeut des…
Nota Bene : Keanu Reeves et la promotion de la pseudo archéologie (Graham Hancock - A l'aube de notre histoire) https://t.co/C0NEdwB09n
RT @NotaBeneMovies: On l'avait pas vu venir, mais Keanu Reeves apparaît sur Netflix dans une série documentaire controversé qui promeut des…
RT @NotaBeneMovies: On l'avait pas vu venir, mais Keanu Reeves apparaît sur Netflix dans une série documentaire controversé qui promeut des…
RT @NotaBeneMovies: On l'avait pas vu venir, mais Keanu Reeves apparaît sur Netflix dans une série documentaire controversé qui promeut des…
RT @NotaBeneMovies: On l'avait pas vu venir, mais Keanu Reeves apparaît sur Netflix dans une série documentaire controversé qui promeut des…
RT @NotaBeneMovies: On l'avait pas vu venir, mais Keanu Reeves apparaît sur Netflix dans une série documentaire controversé qui promeut des…
RT @NotaBeneMovies: On l'avait pas vu venir, mais Keanu Reeves apparaît sur Netflix dans une série documentaire controversé qui promeut des…
RT @NotaBeneMovies: On l'avait pas vu venir, mais Keanu Reeves apparaît sur Netflix dans une série documentaire controversé qui promeut des…
RT @NotaBeneMovies: On l'avait pas vu venir, mais Keanu Reeves apparaît sur Netflix dans une série documentaire controversé qui promeut des…
RT @NotaBeneMovies: On l'avait pas vu venir, mais Keanu Reeves apparaît sur Netflix dans une série documentaire controversé qui promeut des…
RT @NotaBeneMovies: On l'avait pas vu venir, mais Keanu Reeves apparaît sur Netflix dans une série documentaire controversé qui promeut des…
RT @NotaBeneMovies: On l'avait pas vu venir, mais Keanu Reeves apparaît sur Netflix dans une série documentaire controversé qui promeut des…
RT @NotaBeneMovies: On l'avait pas vu venir, mais Keanu Reeves apparaît sur Netflix dans une série documentaire controversé qui promeut des…
RT @NotaBeneMovies: On l'avait pas vu venir, mais Keanu Reeves apparaît sur Netflix dans une série documentaire controversé qui promeut des…
Keanu Reeves et la promotion de la pseudo archéologie (Graham Hancock - ... https://t.co/vVdxBIRqXH via @YouTube
RT @NotaBeneMovies: On l'avait pas vu venir, mais Keanu Reeves apparaît sur Netflix dans une série documentaire controversé qui promeut des…
RT @NotaBeneMovies: On l'avait pas vu venir, mais Keanu Reeves apparaît sur Netflix dans une série documentaire controversé qui promeut des…
RT @NotaBeneMovies: On l'avait pas vu venir, mais Keanu Reeves apparaît sur Netflix dans une série documentaire controversé qui promeut des…
RT @NotaBeneMovies: On l'avait pas vu venir, mais Keanu Reeves apparaît sur Netflix dans une série documentaire controversé qui promeut des…
RT @NotaBeneMovies: On l'avait pas vu venir, mais Keanu Reeves apparaît sur Netflix dans une série documentaire controversé qui promeut des…
RT @NotaBeneMovies: On l'avait pas vu venir, mais Keanu Reeves apparaît sur Netflix dans une série documentaire controversé qui promeut des…
Keanu Reeves et la promotion de la pseudo archéologie (Graham Hancock - ... https://t.co/hsfugJoHQJ via @YouTube
RT @NotaBeneMovies: On l'avait pas vu venir, mais Keanu Reeves apparaît sur Netflix dans une série documentaire controversé qui promeut des…
RT @NotaBeneMovies: On l'avait pas vu venir, mais Keanu Reeves apparaît sur Netflix dans une série documentaire controversé qui promeut des…
RT @NotaBeneMovies: On l'avait pas vu venir, mais Keanu Reeves apparaît sur Netflix dans une série documentaire controversé qui promeut des…
RT @NotaBeneMovies: On l'avait pas vu venir, mais Keanu Reeves apparaît sur Netflix dans une série documentaire controversé qui promeut des…
Ben' on t'aime https://t.co/wFRpmi3g2s
RT @NotaBeneMovies: On l'avait pas vu venir, mais Keanu Reeves apparaît sur Netflix dans une série documentaire controversé qui promeut des…
RT @NotaBeneMovies: On l'avait pas vu venir, mais Keanu Reeves apparaît sur Netflix dans une série documentaire controversé qui promeut des…
RT @NotaBeneMovies: On l'avait pas vu venir, mais Keanu Reeves apparaît sur Netflix dans une série documentaire controversé qui promeut des…
RT @NotaBeneMovies: On l'avait pas vu venir, mais Keanu Reeves apparaît sur Netflix dans une série documentaire controversé qui promeut des…
RT @NotaBeneMovies: On l'avait pas vu venir, mais Keanu Reeves apparaît sur Netflix dans une série documentaire controversé qui promeut des…
RT @NotaBeneMovies: On l'avait pas vu venir, mais Keanu Reeves apparaît sur Netflix dans une série documentaire controversé qui promeut des…
On l'avait pas vu venir, mais Keanu Reeves apparaît sur Netflix dans une série documentaire controversé qui promeut des thèses assez étranges... Faut qu'on en parle : https://t.co/pRQL8lVUux https://t.co/DZA0YZYtX8
@shellenberger Yes, Free Speech - this is the way. To support your position, you will likely find this research article very helpful. Scroll down to the Reducing the Impact of Misinformation section and read the ways. All of which require free speech to implement. https://t.co/5EgQxX1y5h
RT @docrussjackson: Conspiracy theories are persuasive, often playing on people’s feelings and sense of identity. Even if debunking conspir…
Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing - Stephan Lewandowsky, Ullrich K. H. Ecker, Colleen M. Seifert, Norbert Schwarz, John Cook, 2012 https://t.co/NB1WRLx12C
❗️ https://t.co/YFzS6kNYyo
@Silvereagle214 I suggest you read this https://t.co/7G0mmSvp1C
This is really important IMO https://t.co/Eus57SXN04
@AlpacaAurelius The information is out there if you know where to look and stop listening to debunked nonsense. https://t.co/Et1TBnF1T7
@Yunny1XD https://t.co/IGC6XNw9vR this is about antivaxxers for example but we all know that one pseudoscience leads into another because they fit together fundamentally because of people's warped perception of reality and their ideology
RT @SallySueIam: @RichardGrenell @jonkarl It’s unfortunate that our culture, and our media, sometimes give celebrities a chance to comment…
@RichardGrenell @jonkarl It’s unfortunate that our culture, and our media, sometimes give celebrities a chance to comment without opposition on subjects about which they are often misinformed. https://t.co/3PbkXZjnoI
@MrCrapHead There's an interesting video essay about internet arguments and why there's no middle ground online. https://t.co/n3AeNkq47w
A great video from SciShow explains why internet arguments are useless. Both a combination of Confirmation bias and the backfire effect plays into the role. https://t.co/zfGSYWFrnR
Conspiracy theories are persuasive, often playing on people’s feelings and sense of identity. Even if debunking conspiracy theories was effective, it’s difficult to keep up with how quickly they appear and how widespread they travel. https://t.co/VrHkzm8qp9
@JohnWick1886 @0800_KSMY_ASS @luther20230 @Kitty_Grayling @All_Knowing_Bio @fanny_slayer @CachePast @TBD77 @hansel21_ @cbeckj @ShaneAKAProp @Hampson14Jane @Strikenstein @FatalFibers @CaryDavid722 @JiminyC24 @ryanbeed @Adrienn_me @TakethatCt @InCytometry @Carrotsandpars1 @troydee @Amber84280581 @JesseMutiny @nicolas_gaboury @freddieminelli @ptcjoneses @carlsmythe @Sc_ott @rw_christian @mhunt081266 @sunshine_toes @Joe09396262 @SSZ1967 @djchicus @sleightHanded @Crazycdn2 @VUsuxballs @Its_Agenda_2030 @Zeviax3 @NathanaelYoung @leelasik @CAS2328 @hoothathuh @MrDannyTeal @Cubanigar @niall_joe @maggiemay_313 @ThanosStu84 This getting long so I will just link a number of other scientific journal articles on using these techniques to influence us without our knowledge. /9 https://t.co/H3pveo7oJe https://t.co/MACxm7QAog https://t.co/X95ncGdc3w https://t.co/vK1ru5EPFm
He is taking advantage of the Backfire effect, knowing that even if his claims are responded with facts this will only push people further into his ideology https://t.co/uNbB1guQNP
@NickAdamsinUSA @Todd78175916 Thats funny because this study shows that someone who watches Fox News is less informed than someone who doesn't w latch any news. https://t.co/8GLFOy51jL
Another article about, this one about *debiasing* Who decides what is misinformation? "Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing" https://t.co/vK1ru5VSHm
Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing - Stephan Lewandowsky, Ullrich K. H. Ecker, Colleen M. Seifert, Norbert Schwarz, John Cook, 2012 https://t.co/QPBCLCdsJu
@segueopercurso @stacey_bluer1 @Jo_smx If you're interested in the topic of misinformation and haven't read it already, I found this research paper to be very interesting https://t.co/NCAZulVOws
RT @lloyd_frombriz: @NovelSci The cognitive science subdiscipline of heuristics has a lot to say on this. https://t.co/ooJbKZB6wp
@NovelSci The cognitive science subdiscipline of heuristics has a lot to say on this. https://t.co/ooJbKZB6wp
Elizabeth utilise cet article de @STWorg (et ses amis) pour expliquer comment la tentative de correction des erreurs peut se retourner contre vous. https://t.co/mAv7xSPo1H
Elizabeth uses this article from @STWorg (and friends) to help explain how the attempt to correct misinformation can backfire. https://t.co/mAv7xSPo1H
@ignace #btw recomiendo ver este video, para q no gastes tiempo en discusiones q no van a llevar a nada
https://t.co/mVuWI72HGH
https://t.co/OlItRAYEvX #IDT620WVU
RT @BrendanNyhan: @JlibDoesEcon @DGoncalvesDS @Jack_J_Willis Super-interested to read but honest question - you know there's a huge psych l…
@Florin_Uncovers @KleinWanderer @STWorg He appears to be one of those so convinced of the rightness of his position, that it is ok to use behavioral techniques to convince others without their knowledge or consent. I find these people dangerous. https://t.co/vK1ru5VSHm a similar viewpoint https://t.co/wQwhMAoQxh
@STWorg @past_is_future @stuartjdneil @Karen_Douglas @JoeUscinski @Sander_vdLinden @UlliEcker @johnfocook @adamhfinn @jitsuvax @CorneliaBetsch It appears to me that you are using the techniques you have learned to nudge people into what you thing is the right way of thinking. As if your worldview is always the correct one. A very dangerous assumption. https://t.co/vK1ru5VSHm
https://t.co/qbKJbWNdGH
RT @SciComm_ES:
Link del paper de (Lewandowsky et al., 2012) "Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing" https://t.co/jDIt8QQzra
@George_Bliadze @STWorg Second to last sentence in this paragraph, and open access to the article here: https://t.co/xqm7VqIwPB https://t.co/IWsKWCNh5E
@Snowden This is the best science I have read on the matter. https://t.co/IUl2lcksdP
@JlibDoesEcon @DGoncalvesDS @Jack_J_Willis Super-interested to read but honest question - you know there's a huge psych literature on the continued influence effect, right? @UlliEcker @STWorg and many others can tell you more. don't see any of it here. one recent review https://t.co/i1xmlZLlWD
Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing - Stephan Lewandowsky, Ullrich K. H. Ecker, Colleen M. Seifert, Norbert Schwarz, John Cook, 2012 https://t.co/XerYE1o3he
RT @ScienceIsTruth: #ScienceInfo Vaccine myths are a real problem. We waste research money on them, we refuse COVID-29 vaccines because of…
#ScienceInfo Vaccine myths are a real problem. We waste research money on them, we refuse COVID-29 vaccines because of them and parents withhold immunization because of them. Result: People die. How do you fight back and be HEARD? It can be done. https://t.co/o5eiANOCkt https://t.co/gsjXedTrrw
Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing - Stephan Lewandowsky, Ullrich K. H. Ecker, Colleen M. Seifert, Norbert Schwarz, John Cook, 2012 https://t.co/vwFrAb6Aph
Research has shown that corrections post #FactCheck are unable to undo the damage done. The “continued influence effect” phenomenon shows that “post-exposure” is unable to reach the same number of people as the original #misinformation https://t.co/rUfjLSGo3k
Source (2012): https://t.co/ZUGFBeSQRb
Because it‘s the day after Jan 6 2020 Quoting from a 2012 research on debiasing vs. misinformation. Surely worth reading - today more than ever https://t.co/k7KdkrycEJ https://t.co/1Xd0JpZ22r
@konkret24 @tvn24 @GabaSieczkowska @Jan_Kunert * grafika zapożyczona z https://t.co/sqVCzZzoLY Polecam całość
- Lewandowsky, Ecker, Seifert, Schwarz and Cook. “Misinformation and its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing.” (https://t.co/BgSGOPcThi) Association for Psychological Science, September 18, 2012.
@the_warhead @spectatorindex https://t.co/QsyWM0VSPF
@H_Sjastad A great resource on this topic. https://t.co/QM81XNoaLu
Sources : [1] : https://t.co/sFrPPGFrtJ [2] : https://t.co/Jp6cLhPknI [3] : https://t.co/NSn8MOI7Jj [4] : https://t.co/QQnT2tDKyv [5] : https://t.co/8LEyti3xYA Fin du fil, merci pour la lecture si vous en êtes arrivés là
Older but still a good overview -> Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing - Stephan Lewandowsky, Ullrich K. H. Ecker, Colleen M. Seifert, Norbert Schwarz, John Cook, 2012 https://t.co/HZO9S4oHCk
https://t.co/UfcWQlZb7H
This article which has some misinformation but useful anyways. It's the best thing I have, also discusses points well, and interesting references. https://t.co/sYrYjiGmZ7
https://t.co/4HYO2cofS3
Yes! The best way to stop the influence of misinformation, rather than fighting it be correction, IS preventing it from being seen... https://t.co/6vy2ZRXjgd https://t.co/LTGzDcpapQ
RT @clifflampe: This article is a really nice review of the cognitive factors that feed into misinformation. https://t.co/9dFWolgYWS
RT @clifflampe: This article is a really nice review of the cognitive factors that feed into misinformation. https://t.co/9dFWolgYWS
RT @clifflampe: This article is a really nice review of the cognitive factors that feed into misinformation. https://t.co/9dFWolgYWS
RT @clifflampe: This article is a really nice review of the cognitive factors that feed into misinformation. https://t.co/9dFWolgYWS
RT @clifflampe: This article is a really nice review of the cognitive factors that feed into misinformation. https://t.co/9dFWolgYWS
RT @clifflampe: This article is a really nice review of the cognitive factors that feed into misinformation. https://t.co/9dFWolgYWS
RT @clifflampe: This article is a really nice review of the cognitive factors that feed into misinformation. https://t.co/9dFWolgYWS
RT @clifflampe: This article is a really nice review of the cognitive factors that feed into misinformation. https://t.co/9dFWolgYWS
RT @clifflampe: This article is a really nice review of the cognitive factors that feed into misinformation. https://t.co/9dFWolgYWS
RT @clifflampe: This article is a really nice review of the cognitive factors that feed into misinformation. https://t.co/9dFWolgYWS
RT @clifflampe: This article is a really nice review of the cognitive factors that feed into misinformation. https://t.co/9dFWolgYWS
This article is a really nice review of the cognitive factors that feed into misinformation. https://t.co/9dFWolgYWS
Por qué no puedes ganar un argumento de Internet https://t.co/3Zbix0OAli @SinsentidoC @Stfko_memero @diego_castro_a @huronio @remisramosc
Research by @STWorg et al. in @PsychScience tackles how ideology and personal views serve as major obstacles to reducing bias. This is the challenge of #SciComm: penetrating biases, especially when scientific evidence directly opposes one’s worldview. https://t.co/4MrhrbJJjw
Why You Can't Win an Internet Argument https://t.co/3Zbix0OAli a través de @YouTube
https://t.co/j2ERaD0dJJ
@jakesyma @PeterHotez @BMurphy_AMA @AmerMedicalAssn @OSHA_DOL It won't surprise you that climate experts + cognitive psychologists have been working on how to effectively debunk misinformation for a while now and the parallels are nearly exact! @johnfocook and @STWorg are experts, here's just one resource: https://t.co/iZU9x2oUpB
5) If the argument has gone back and forth more than four times, it's unfortunately not likely to come to a resolution. Make a final statement, and move on. You've done your best :) https://t.co/Ke7O9mJB9Q
@CaitLamberton Here’s one great review on this topic. https://t.co/MGG21xaHVm
@bookletting @katemyoder @grist @johnfocook Next, the Debunking Handbook he co-authored with @STWorg https://t.co/FOn6c8k1yY and then some of Steve's many articles on the topic, starting with his most-cited, "Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing" https://t.co/FkLKWmufRj
@darakass Really nice peer reviewed article https://t.co/r7t0Jvzic0
RT @LizNeeley: Here is figure 1: “A graphical summary of findings from the #misinformation literature” from Lewandowsky et al (no paywall,…
RT @LizNeeley: Here is figure 1: “A graphical summary of findings from the #misinformation literature” from Lewandowsky et al (no paywall,…
@H4Hazem @AcademicChatter Hi there, there are many. If you start with this paper and look at the recent citations, you will see many papers exploring what you are looking at! https://t.co/MCjPulVBae
RT @j_stokesparish: For those of you who are interested in tackling misinformation - an oldie but a goodie with practical tips. #FOAMed #FO…
For those of you who are interested in tackling misinformation - an oldie but a goodie with practical tips. #FOAMed #FOANed https://t.co/MCjPulVBae
RT @LizNeeley: Here is figure 1: “A graphical summary of findings from the #misinformation literature” from Lewandowsky et al (no paywall,…
RT @LizNeeley: Here is figure 1: “A graphical summary of findings from the #misinformation literature” from Lewandowsky et al (no paywall,…
RT @LizNeeley: Here is figure 1: “A graphical summary of findings from the #misinformation literature” from Lewandowsky et al (no paywall,…
Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing https://t.co/nMvdmAQJ3F
Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing. https://t.co/0sXJi9IrLW
RT @LizNeeley: Here is figure 1: “A graphical summary of findings from the #misinformation literature” from Lewandowsky et al (no paywall,…
RT @LizNeeley: Here is figure 1: “A graphical summary of findings from the #misinformation literature” from Lewandowsky et al (no paywall,…
RT @LizNeeley: Here is figure 1: “A graphical summary of findings from the #misinformation literature” from Lewandowsky et al (no paywall,…
RT @LizNeeley: Here is figure 1: “A graphical summary of findings from the #misinformation literature” from Lewandowsky et al (no paywall,…
RT @LizNeeley: Here is figure 1: “A graphical summary of findings from the #misinformation literature” from Lewandowsky et al (no paywall,…
RT @LizNeeley: Here is figure 1: “A graphical summary of findings from the #misinformation literature” from Lewandowsky et al (no paywall,…
RT @LizNeeley: Here is figure 1: “A graphical summary of findings from the #misinformation literature” from Lewandowsky et al (no paywall,…
RT @LizNeeley: Here is figure 1: “A graphical summary of findings from the #misinformation literature” from Lewandowsky et al (no paywall,…
RT @LizNeeley: Here is figure 1: “A graphical summary of findings from the #misinformation literature” from Lewandowsky et al (no paywall,…
RT @LizNeeley: Here is figure 1: “A graphical summary of findings from the #misinformation literature” from Lewandowsky et al (no paywall,…
RT @LizNeeley: Here is figure 1: “A graphical summary of findings from the #misinformation literature” from Lewandowsky et al (no paywall,…
https://t.co/96qfjyBtPI
@TristanKamin pour ce qui est de la manière, il y a quelques éléments intéressants à la fin de ce papier : https://t.co/YbNzXVmvuu répéter les faits sans évoquer la thèse principale, être bref et concis etc... https://t.co/TjOxwBx3nM
"For good reasons, a newspaper’s weather forecast relies on expert assessment and excludes lay opinions." https://t.co/95XxSBQLzm
RT @LizNeeley: Here is figure 1: “A graphical summary of findings from the #misinformation literature” from Lewandowsky et al (no paywall,…
A good read for those interested in effective science communication and dispelling myths. Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing https://t.co/Nbe69V0OsI #scicomm https://t.co/KGCXKJsZzA
RT @LizNeeley: Here is figure 1: “A graphical summary of findings from the #misinformation literature” from Lewandowsky et al (no paywall,…
RT @LizNeeley: Here is figure 1: “A graphical summary of findings from the #misinformation literature” from Lewandowsky et al (no paywall,…
Lewandowsky et al. (2012) Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing https://t.co/AQXwf68BGn https://t.co/gmGv2pEgQM
RT @LizNeeley: Here is figure 1: “A graphical summary of findings from the #misinformation literature” from Lewandowsky et al (no paywall,…
RT @LizNeeley: Here is figure 1: “A graphical summary of findings from the #misinformation literature” from Lewandowsky et al (no paywall,…
RT @LizNeeley: Here is figure 1: “A graphical summary of findings from the #misinformation literature” from Lewandowsky et al (no paywall,…
RT @LizNeeley: Here is figure 1: “A graphical summary of findings from the #misinformation literature” from Lewandowsky et al (no paywall,…
RT @LizNeeley: Here is figure 1: “A graphical summary of findings from the #misinformation literature” from Lewandowsky et al (no paywall,…
RT @LizNeeley: Here is figure 1: “A graphical summary of findings from the #misinformation literature” from Lewandowsky et al (no paywall,…
RT @LizNeeley: Here is figure 1: “A graphical summary of findings from the #misinformation literature” from Lewandowsky et al (no paywall,…
RT @LizNeeley: Here is figure 1: “A graphical summary of findings from the #misinformation literature” from Lewandowsky et al (no paywall,…
RT @LizNeeley: Here is figure 1: “A graphical summary of findings from the #misinformation literature” from Lewandowsky et al (no paywall,…
RT @LizNeeley: Here is figure 1: “A graphical summary of findings from the #misinformation literature” from Lewandowsky et al (no paywall,…
very good psychology article on combatting misinformation/myth, on-line or otherwise, with this handy-dandy chart! thanks to @rachelnabors for sharing this. https://t.co/n2vjwAkp6B /cc @TWIScience @drkiki @blairsmenagerie @SHOUTYBLAIR @Jacksonfly
RT @LizNeeley: Here is figure 1: “A graphical summary of findings from the #misinformation literature” from Lewandowsky et al (no paywall,…
RT @LizNeeley: Here is figure 1: “A graphical summary of findings from the #misinformation literature” from Lewandowsky et al (no paywall,…
RT @LizNeeley: Here is figure 1: “A graphical summary of findings from the #misinformation literature” from Lewandowsky et al (no paywall,…
Here is figure 1: “A graphical summary of findings from the #misinformation literature” from Lewandowsky et al (no paywall, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1529100612451018) Solution is repeated, simple rebuttals that emphasize the correct information, framed to affirm...
Here is figure 1: “A graphical summary of findings from the #misinformation literature” from Lewandowsky et al (no paywall, https://t.co/T6r1R44WAZ) Solution is repeated, simple rebuttals that emphasize the correct information, framed to affirm worldview/identity. https://t.co/ZAJRlLp3yv
Here is a good review for @AusSMC and @JN_Institute https://t.co/6DURWFwg9H
@DrEricStrong https://t.co/DLwqJLE2FD
Hey @tiffany_peltier, you must definitely read this article if you have not yet: Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. You will love it!
Why You Cant Win Internet Arguments. I saw a video saying that internet arguments are a waste of time because most of the time the person on the other end is not going to listen to your statement no matter how right you are. In fact you might... https://t.co/UNdXPUyNlp
RT @rskudesia: How to fight fake news (and how not to) according to the research
Misinformation and Its Correction Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing 2012 https://t.co/F94m8gvl39 A-graphical-summary-of-findings-from-the-misinformation-literature https://t.co/ZjOoh6QX77
@H_Sjastad I am pretty sure that this paper mentions fluency as one of the factors, though it might not be what you were looking for. "Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing" by Lewandowsky et al., 2012 https://t.co/0kJJ1XKX0L
RT @rskudesia: How to fight fake news (and how not to) according to the research
RT @rskudesia: How to fight fake news (and how not to) according to the research
How to fight fake news (and how not to) according to the research
• Minimize the number of times you repeat their argument/language. • Use (very) different speech patterns than they are using. • Couch the argument as being between two/few individuals, not 2+ groups/camps (prefer "I" over "we"). • Remember the human. https://t.co/96OWEVoUXj
pride month is coming and i feel like it's important to remember about this video every time you guys see some dumbass and feel like arguing with them where i can see it https://t.co/G3NtOrPhmu
While we are here, this is a paper from 2012 discussing the nuance of misinformation and the theory-driven methods for counteracting its spread or influence. https://t.co/Gqoo5OqKXH https://t.co/JbeGfLRvWQ
@Desdelparian Es desgastante. Aparte de inútil. https://t.co/N3aBHihaG3
Why You Can't Win an Internet Argument https://t.co/LVNLbKQxqA
@extradeadly @Lino_Lauza @TatsNkonzo https://t.co/hgGL4mwHI2
please watch this video every time u feel like getting into internet argument https://t.co/G3NtOrPhmu
@alphyna @reivaxxx @BruOverseer @specialcinisism ну вот тут на смежную тему. первый эксперимент описываемый, это как раз то как буквально через 3 дня люди конкретно забыли про "что" учёные указали "это неправда" и стали вспоминать выдуманное как действительное (но не наоборот) https://t.co/qpsoPRfFQP
@ElhiAhcolee @ayythedragon @LackingSaint https://t.co/ebApCSdzy9 there are 19 citations as to the nature of online debate in this video’s description
RT @piratachile: #DatoPirata
#DatoPirata
“Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing,” Margaret Weigel https://t.co/ahUpawObER media/misinformation-correction-successful-debiasing (Links to an external site.) #JMC305Greer
#DatoPirata
L
C
I
RK
BO
D
KC
SM
T
DA
ML
NG
RM
PH
JG
GG
海
L
Z
M
SG
SS
P
N
M
OB
LL
M
LS
PL
KC
AA
CC
Z
DG
PS
MJ
S
S
D
I
ID
SJ
CD
E
JI
CM
TF
CB
VN
IP
EG
JA
R
AH
CL
NA
AZ
RM
MH
RU
SL
T
PH
TF
M
JO
DR
LE
J李
EK
MS
TB
MX
JL
P
T
RS
GK
SW
DP
LM
G
ME
CA
AB
KS
A
KC
RC
TR
SC
SF
MS
ME
G
CD
SM
GL
MC
JC
TT
Y
LI
MV
MS
GF
S
MD
E
D
AB
VS
AD
EY