Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
Throughout the discussions, users question the scientific backing of the 'preferred movement path' and 'comfort filter' concepts, with comments like 'any studies or RCTs to back up these theories?' and critiques of pronation myths. The tone varies between curiosity and skepticism, reflecting an engaged but cautious exploration of the article's ideas.
The discussion shows mixed reactions; some express skepticism about the theories, while others acknowledge the relevance of comfort and movement patterns.
Most posts demonstrate moderate interest, with some users asking for evidence and others commenting on the concepts' relevance.
Participants actively engage by questioning assumptions, referencing related research, and discussing implications, indicating thoughtful involvement.
The social discussions appear to influence perceptions but do not indicate widespread changes in beliefs or practices regarding running injuries.
@tomgoom I have a real problem with the concept of pronation-related injuries. It presupposes that pronation a) is directly related to injury and b) certain injuries are more related to over pronation than others. I think this paper by @BennoNigg summarizes this https://t.co/IZBhkDuk7M
Athletes are individual, complex systems, governed by ‘constraints’ which apply ‘boundaries’ to how they can move. And according to the ‘preferred movement path hypothesis’, athletes develop a unique, preferred — & most efficient — running technique. https://t.co/qo5CeIqeCF
@CraigBPayne Thanks for sharing @CraigBPayne Other than a couple cross sectional studies (https://t.co/MxTjx4kGbh) & (https://t.co/dOk3nRcY8o) do we have a lot of confidence that rearfoot eversion truly matters for RRI? Seems the data is fairly weak on this construct https://t.co/AEGIuu70Y9
Running shoes and running injuries: mythbusting and a proposal for two new paradigms: ‘preferred movement path’ and ‘comfort filter’https://t.co/zFoOM9uwiK https://t.co/ep8lBZuKww
@Rubberbandits Another gorgeous listening experience, thanks @Rubberbandits However. On the subject of pronation: You may be accidentally perpetuating myths that footwear companies want us believe, just so we buy more shoes. https://t.co/NC0XlGGWcW P.S. but glad the shoes are helping!
RT @jefftaylorhaas: @tomgoom I have a real problem with the concept of pronation-related injuries. It presupposes that pronation a) is dire…
This video explores the causes of running injuries, including common types and classifications such as acute and chronic injuries. It highlights intrinsic and extrinsic risk factors and examines the importance of…
This lecture discusses common running injuries, their classifications, risk factors including previous injuries, body composition, age, sex, experience, and running volume, and the challenges in research for injury…
Learn how to prevent ankle tears and other ankle injuries with tips from Olympic athlete Christina Hering. This video, developed with PhysioApp Exakt Health, covers strength training, proprioception, balance, and injury…
@DerekGriffin86 Thanks Derek. Any evidence that comfort is a mediating variable? e.g., any studies or RCTs to back up the 'preferred movement path' and 'comfort filter' theories? https://t.co/O5c8rh9E0U
escolha do tênis de corrida: filtro do conforto. Esteja atentos aos nossos próximos passos (spoiler) #corrersemlesao #teniscerto #runningshoes https://t.co/ofzjoKjx52
Running shoes and running injuries: mythbusting and a proposal for two new paradigms: ‘preferred movement path’ and ‘comfort filter’ | British Journal of Sports Medicine https://t.co/zSCbilTuGV
Athletes are individual, complex systems, governed by ‘constraints’ which apply ‘boundaries’ to how they can move. And according to the ‘preferred movement path hypothesis’, athletes develop a unique, preferred — & most efficient — running technique. https://t.co/qo5CeIqeCF
@Rubberbandits Another gorgeous listening experience, thanks @Rubberbandits However. On the subject of pronation: You may be accidentally perpetuating myths that footwear companies want us believe, just so we buy more shoes. https://t.co/NC0XlGGWcW P.S. but glad the shoes are helping!
RT @jefftaylorhaas: @tomgoom I have a real problem with the concept of pronation-related injuries. It presupposes that pronation a) is dire…
@tomgoom I have a real problem with the concept of pronation-related injuries. It presupposes that pronation a) is directly related to injury and b) certain injuries are more related to over pronation than others. I think this paper by @BennoNigg summarizes this https://t.co/IZBhkDuk7M
@abbottPDX Link to article: https://t.co/IZBhkDuk7M
Running shoes and injuries https://t.co/2KgIFOXlkf
Running shoes vs injury? Two paradigms, 'the preferred movement path' and 'the comfort filter', suggest that a runner intuitively selects a comfortable product using their own comfort filter that allows them to remain in the preferred movement path https://t.co/VpfWzhNSFG
@CraigBPayne Thanks for sharing @CraigBPayne Other than a couple cross sectional studies (https://t.co/MxTjx4kGbh) & (https://t.co/dOk3nRcY8o) do we have a lot of confidence that rearfoot eversion truly matters for RRI? Seems the data is fairly weak on this construct https://t.co/AEGIuu70Y9
Running shoes and running injuries: mythbusting and a proposal for two new paradigms: ‘preferred movement path’ and ‘comfort filter’https://t.co/zFoOM9uwiK https://t.co/ep8lBZuKww