Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The social discussions reveal a mix of skepticism and acknowledgment, exemplified by posts referencing other scientific studies and dismissing concerns with phrases like 'not the first time' or 'debunked here,' whereas some posts show interest by citing specific research, showing varying levels of engagement and impact based on tone and detail.
The discussions show mixed reactions, with some posts skeptical or dismissive, while others acknowledge the study’s implications or supporting evidence.
Most discussions indicate moderate curiosity about the study, with some posts deeply referencing related research and others only briefly mentioning the topic.
Posts reflect some depth, especially those citing scientific studies or debating health implications, but many are short or dismissive, limiting engagement.
The overall effect appears limited, as many posts express skepticism or trivialize the findings, suggesting a cautious perception of the study’s real-world influence.
2/3 So what you can do? First, really accept that it's an issue and causes problems. List of studies and articles: https://t.co/4Fl8AjwRXr https://t.co/FI1vtwq0mZ https://t.co/h9JCmV33QJ https://t.co/f9nXTHt1M9 https://t.co/c7eAwhNSgm https://t.co/XLNAIHnbhk
https://t.co/IVSDPKDH3m Is this true ?? @MoHFW_INDIA @NaMo4PM @timesofindia @AdvaitaKala.Regulation on quality of food products and prices is something Indian Govt should considered monitoring very closely.When can Indians pick up a fruit from shop shelf an eat without washing.
@moy_qmac @AngelC1796 @nanoprofe @ElenaBuylla Digamos que no es la primera vez que una compañía pone el dinero por encima de la salud de las personas. Además ya se demostraron daños en ratas a dosis bajísimas, un alimento del super tiene dosis 100 veces mayores. https://t.co/t47d4NNgKg
https://t.co/5zHQKom37i
@sarde_le @Plantophage @sabine_38 @damianverze @AvilaMedardo Bon et pour debunker ton assertion sur le fait que seuls des papiers utilisant des doses de cheval trouvent des toxicité, petite revue de qqs papiers dont certains sont pourtant âgés... Dommages au foie et aux reins https://t.co/7I8lyCO2X7
@aim_co_ltd @sironekotaishow @3110farm @NIES_JP @Toyokeizai @nissanchem_rup Mesnage R、Arno M、Costanzo M、Seralini GE、Antoniou M.、「トランスクリプトームプロファイル分析は、慢性的な超低用量ラウンドアップ曝露後のラットの肝臓および腎臓の損傷を反映」 Environmental Health 2015、14:70 doi:10.1186/s12940-015-0056-1
This video examines the effects of long-term exposure to ultralow doses of Roundup on rat liver and kidney tissues, highlighting significant cellular, genetic, and biochemical alterations.
This study investigates the effects of long-term exposure to ultra-low doses of Roundup on rat liver and kidney health, revealing structural, biochemical, and gene expression changes that indicate potential organ damage…
@moy_qmac @AngelC1796 @nanoprofe @ElenaBuylla Digamos que no es la primera vez que una compañía pone el dinero por encima de la salud de las personas. Además ya se demostraron daños en ratas a dosis bajísimas, un alimento del super tiene dosis 100 veces mayores. https://t.co/t47d4NNgKg
@dr_andrealove Your fabricated bs is debunked here: https://t.co/LisbpOfb16 and https://t.co/uOcjdpBlnb Cry me a river; you and your stupid phd
RT @Helios_Movement: 2/3 So what you can do? First, really accept that it's an issue and causes problems. List of studies and articles: h…
2/3 So what you can do? First, really accept that it's an issue and causes problems. List of studies and articles: https://t.co/4Fl8AjwRXr https://t.co/FI1vtwq0mZ https://t.co/h9JCmV33QJ https://t.co/f9nXTHt1M9 https://t.co/c7eAwhNSgm https://t.co/XLNAIHnbhk
@aim_co_ltd @sironekotaishow @3110farm @NIES_JP @Toyokeizai @nissanchem_rup Mesnage R、Arno M、Costanzo M、Seralini GE、Antoniou M.、「トランスクリプトームプロファイル分析は、慢性的な超低用量ラウンドアップ曝露後のラットの肝臓および腎臓の損傷を反映」 Environmental Health 2015、14:70 doi:10.1186/s12940-015-0056-1
@aim_co_ltd @sironekotaishow @3110farm @NIES_JP @Toyokeizai @nissanchem_rup Mesnage R、Arno M、Costanzo M、Seralini GE、Antoniou M.、「トランスクリプトームプロファイル分析は、慢性的な超低用量ラウンドアップ曝露後のラットの肝臓および腎臓の損傷を反映」 Environmental Health 2015、14:70 doi:10.1186/s12940-015-0056-1
ラットに超低用量(0.1 ppb)のグリホサートに長期間曝露させた実験で、ラットの肝臓、腎臓に損傷を引き起こした。 超低用量でもダメってことです。つまり、毎日普通にパンや大豆を食べていると確実に病気になるということです。 量の概念がぁーは通用しません。 https://t.co/FSJ36tj9PJ
@sarde_le @Plantophage @sabine_38 @damianverze @AvilaMedardo Bon et pour debunker ton assertion sur le fait que seuls des papiers utilisant des doses de cheval trouvent des toxicité, petite revue de qqs papiers dont certains sont pourtant âgés... Dommages au foie et aux reins https://t.co/7I8lyCO2X7
https://t.co/5zHQKom37i
@5PriscillaKing https://t.co/mCsjroYLtd
@ACSHorg Best not to have glyphosate going through your kidneys, though. https://t.co/RtS3tc4h5X
https://t.co/aClND5kHYN
https://t.co/IVSDPKDH3m Is this true ?? @MoHFW_INDIA @NaMo4PM @timesofindia @AdvaitaKala.Regulation on quality of food products and prices is something Indian Govt should considered monitoring very closely.When can Indians pick up a fruit from shop shelf an eat without washing.
https://t.co/EWXYyUIqq2
A must watch,,,,, please
@MacLesggy https://t.co/Sl1zlB1but
@Gabriel050111 @29aatea comme vous voudrez, vous ne voulez avoir qu'un son de cloche. Il y a pourtant cette étude de 2015 dans Natural Health : https://t.co/TL2ImVXhTr Ou celle-ci dans Nature : https://t.co/f6cG6mSx09 Mais faites comme vous voulez
@sense_strand “Glyphosate’s primary perceived mode of herbicidal action is to inhibit 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS) of the shikimate aromatic amino acid biosynthesis pathway present in plants and some bacteria.” 1/3 https://t.co/a5W0V0AYRQ
GF
B
CH
ZC
ま
F
VS
信
G
SE
IC
PL
TN