Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
Discussions reflect a nuanced debate around the environmental impacts of cultured meat, with some posters emphasizing its potential to reduce land use and emissions if renewable energy is used, as seen in comments praising low-impact outcomes. Conversely, others question the assumptions underlying the publication, citing the energy-intensive nature of industrial processes and the use of questionable sources, which moderates the overall perception of impact. The tone varies from optimistic to skeptical, with participants referencing scientific studies and technological limitations to support their viewpoints.
The majority of discussions express skepticism or raise questions about the environmental benefits of cultured meat, indicating some disagreement or cautious stance regarding the publication's optimistic implications.
Posts show high curiosity, with many referencing multiple studies, different countries, and technological aspects, demonstrating strong interest in the subject and its broader implications.
Several discussions delve into detailed scientific debates, critique assumptions, and compare alternatives, reflecting a moderate level of deep engagement rather than surface-level commentary.
While the discussions highlight the relevance of the topic and its potential significance, many express doubt about the actual environmental or industrial impact, suggesting perceptions of moderate impact rather than high.
Can we get meat, milk and cheese with really low CO2 emissions and land use? I think so! Cows, pigs and chickens can't run on low carbon electricity. But the production of cultured meat and milk can! This is often overlooked. (see picture & thread) https://t.co/nId59Rk7iN https://t.co/VsmAuT3xgi
2015年の研究。合成肉は家畜よりも必要な農業投入物や土地は減るものの、より集中的なエネルギー使用を必要とする可能性が有る。＞ https://t.co/Xjtp7m1Esj
Problème, cette affirmation repose sur des hypothèses questionnables issues d'une autre étude de 2015, à commencer par une impossible prise en compte des évolutions technologiques... et des bioréacteurs alimentés par un mix non décarboné ! https://t.co/ojUXBSWYkG
@TyRBeal @vanvlietphd @SustainableDish @GHGGuru And this: https://t.co/NIsfMeAjgK
@altusda @PatTheTerrible The technology is still too speculative to really know. The best/most recent cultured meat lifecycle assessment is probably this: https://t.co/uHp7RjUj5i
A volte quello che ci piace chiamare “progresso” non lo è. https://t.co/iFPzUUOtiU https://t.co/WQVQeYzQvu https://t.co/UVKYQMERmD E rimarrebbero pure necessari le aggiunte di antibiotici (le colture cellulari non hanno un sistema immunitario) e di anabolizzanti. https://t.co/iMXeK8iv1N
A tiny Brazilian bird holds the new world record for singing loudly, comparable to ambulance sirens or thunder. Food scientists also adapt medical techniques to improve fake meat texture. Discover more scientific…
The consumption of meat presents significant climate challenges, notably contributing to greenhouse gas emissions like methane and carbon dioxide. This video analyzes the climate impacts of cultured meat compared to…
Scientists are growing meat cell by cell in the lab without GMOs. This clean meat is developed by startups aiming to introduce lab grown meat into the market. It offers potential environmental benefits and complex…
@elliotswartz Problem of lab grown meat -one of many-is that it fights against a moving target CH4 emissions can be cut with additives & technology Europe emissions from livestock are <7% Here why lab grown emissions higher than from real meat: https://t.co/xXbg30y23S https://t.co/NvmTzI0m2V
Problème, cette affirmation repose sur des hypothèses questionnables issues d'une autre étude de 2015, à commencer par une impossible prise en compte des évolutions technologiques... et des bioréacteurs alimentés par un mix non décarboné ! https://t.co/ojUXBSWYkG
RT @dfocosi: A volte quello che ci piace chiamare “progresso” non lo è. https://t.co/iFPzUUOtiU https://t.co/WQVQeYzQvu https://t.co/UVK…
A volte quello che ci piace chiamare “progresso” non lo è. https://t.co/iFPzUUOtiU https://t.co/WQVQeYzQvu https://t.co/UVKYQMERmD E rimarrebbero pure necessari le aggiunte di antibiotici (le colture cellulari non hanno un sistema immunitario) e di anabolizzanti. https://t.co/iMXeK8iv1N
@medroogle @FoxNews Environmental science & Tech 49, no.19: 11941-49, https://t.co/huYj4gURf1
Anticipatory Life Cycle Analysis of In Vitro Biomass Cultivation for Cultured Meat Production in the United States https://t.co/F8cvLB1m9I @STEPS_STC
@samvwaal @Sallyjoagain @pmarca this is one such article that indicates scaling cell culture for the world is basically another round of industrialization.. https://t.co/AFU4hXi4c1 basically from the concept of emergy (energy flows) cultured meat has a long way to be as efficient as nature
RT @kawamomotwitt: 2015年の研究。合成肉は家畜よりも必要な農業投入物や土地は減るものの、より集中的なエネルギー使用を必要とする可能性が有る。＞ https://t.co/Xjtp7m1Esj
RT @kawamomotwitt: 2015年の研究。合成肉は家畜よりも必要な農業投入物や土地は減るものの、より集中的なエネルギー使用を必要とする可能性が有る。＞ https://t.co/Xjtp7m1Esj
RT @kawamomotwitt: 2015年の研究。合成肉は家畜よりも必要な農業投入物や土地は減るものの、より集中的なエネルギー使用を必要とする可能性が有る。＞ https://t.co/Xjtp7m1Esj
2015年の研究。合成肉は家畜よりも必要な農業投入物や土地は減るものの、より集中的なエネルギー使用を必要とする可能性が有る。＞ https://t.co/Xjtp7m1Esj
@Gargotejant @esparver @escabellat L'escenari amb renovables seria el CM (sust.), on en aquest cas sí q consideren que tindria menys impacte q porc/pollastre. De tota manera depen de l'estudi els marges son diferents (p.ex: https://t.co/TzCvLveOJd) El que és inequivoc es que tindria molt menys impacte q ruminants.
@GeorgeMonbiot https://t.co/u17T5zFJ8h
@GeorgeMonbiot https://t.co/u17T5zFJ8h
@TyRBeal @vanvlietphd @SustainableDish @GHGGuru And this: https://t.co/NIsfMeAjgK
RT @AukeHoekstra: Can we get meat, milk and cheese with really low CO2 emissions and land use? I think so! Cows, pigs and chickens can't…
RT @AukeHoekstra: Can we get meat, milk and cheese with really low CO2 emissions and land use? I think so! Cows, pigs and chickens can't…
RT @AukeHoekstra: Can we get meat, milk and cheese with really low CO2 emissions and land use? I think so! Cows, pigs and chickens can't…
RT @AukeHoekstra: Can we get meat, milk and cheese with really low CO2 emissions and land use? I think so! Cows, pigs and chickens can't…
RT @AukeHoekstra: Can we get meat, milk and cheese with really low CO2 emissions and land use? I think so! Cows, pigs and chickens can't…
RT @AukeHoekstra: Can we get meat, milk and cheese with really low CO2 emissions and land use? I think so! Cows, pigs and chickens can't…
RT @AukeHoekstra: Can we get meat, milk and cheese with really low CO2 emissions and land use? I think so! Cows, pigs and chickens can't…
RT @AukeHoekstra: Can we get meat, milk and cheese with really low CO2 emissions and land use? I think so! Cows, pigs and chickens can't…
Can we get meat, milk and cheese with really low CO2 emissions and land use? I think so! Cows, pigs and chickens can't run on low carbon electricity. But the production of cultured meat and milk can! This is often overlooked. (see picture & thread) https://t.co/nId59Rk7iN https://t.co/VsmAuT3xgi
@Frank_Luttels @afgijselijk en deze is ook interessant. het is zeker niet alleen maar rozengeur met fake meat. https://t.co/C5GvQZmkXJ
RT @NewHarvestOrg: @altusda @PatTheTerrible The technology is still too speculative to really know. The best/most recent cultured meat life…
@altusda @PatTheTerrible The technology is still too speculative to really know. The best/most recent cultured meat lifecycle assessment is probably this: https://t.co/uHp7RjUj5i
@mrmattjackson @pibblepeople @DorckeyHellmice @eugenegu they have primary research studies in the article, like this https://t.co/Nn1MFxxmlr
@Sturm_Truppen_ @dref21 @MacLesggy @sfoucart 1⃣ je ne prétend pas maîtriser tous les tenants et aboutissants du sujet. 2⃣ rien de ce qui est dit dans cette vidéo ne réfute les constats que j'ai énoncés, à part peut être l'impact environnemental, mais c'est loin d'être un consensus scientifique → https://t.co/Xq3IDbjusi
With "lab grown" meat all the rage, want to remind that the hoped benefit of such hangs on likely using MORE "industrial" energy, not less (fig 3 below from https://t.co/kqAuIFBWJ8 ). Only #regenerativeagriculture can take the right chart below 0, because uses mostly sunshine. https://t.co/948TBdzD7G
This study examines the #environmental implications of this emerging technology and compares the results with published impacts of different meats. #Anticipatory #LifeCycleAnalysis of In Vitro Biomass Cultivation for Cultured Meat Production in the U.S.: https://t.co/bAZFtWIgsi https://t.co/pGW30n49Vp
@joriannev2 @Draven974 @Treich13 Je ne vais pas citer toutes les études prospectives (tout de même, une autre à ma connaissance plus ancienne : https://t.co/ZeUMoHgKu1), je pense juste que la dimension environnementale est bien plus complexe sur cette question de la production de viande de synthèse.
@Eeebual @schauol1 @MartinHaeusling Hier geht es um In-vitro-Fleisch. Wenn das mal technisch so weit ist wird es in der Ökobilanz vermutlich mit Abstand schlechter abschneiden als jede Tierhaltung weil der technische und energetische Aufwand viel grösser ist. https://t.co/TkUL8kFnnX https://t.co/RmEXiRV0qx
@GHGGuru @jonnettlefold @AllanRSavory @Smark_phd @drdairy50 @LouiseStephen9 @figureoutfood @JoannaBlythman Environmental implications of Cultured Meat as an emerging technology, compared to beef, pork, and poultry. Is it worth it? https://t.co/0IhsCiv5tT
#Environmental implications of #CulturedMeat as an emerging technology, compared to #beef, #pork, and #poultry Is it worth it? https://t.co/0IhsCiv5tT