Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The discussions reflect a neutral stance toward the publication, with some posts referencing the issue of false negatives in targeted biopsies and questioning the reliability of current methods. The tone remains cautious and factual, emphasizing the technical aspects without strong emotional language, which contributes to moderate interest and engagement levels.
Most discussions acknowledge the findings but do not strongly agree or disagree, indicating neutrality.
There is mild curiosity about the topic, especially given the technical nature and focus on biopsy methods.
Participants seem to have a moderate level of engagement, some referencing specific aspects of biopsy failure without deep analysis.
The conversation appears to have limited influence yet highlights ongoing concerns about detection methods.
#ThrowbackThursday #ProstateCancer detection on transrectal US‐guided random biopsy despite negative real‐time MRI/ultrasonography fusion‐guided targeted biopsy: reasons for targeted biopsy failure https://t.co/p9gKsVaFcA #Tbt
This video discusses reasons for targeted biopsy failure in prostate cancer detection, particularly when ultrasound-guided random biopsies detect cancer despite negative MRI/ultrasound fusion-guided results.
#ThrowbackThursday #ProstateCancer detection on transrectal US‐guided random biopsy despite negative real‐time MRI/ultrasonography fusion‐guided targeted biopsy: reasons for targeted biopsy failure https://t.co/p9gKsVaFcA #Tbt
BI